RE: [SA-list] Feature Request?

List mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)> Subject: Re: [SA-list] Feature Request?   I love kiwisyslog! However Solarwinds bought it! The free edition only accepts 5 devices. :(    On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Dirk Bulinckx mailto:d...@woodstone.nu)> wrote: Hi,     I did thin

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request?

@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Anthony Laatz Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 10:50 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] Feature Request? I love kiwisyslog! However Solarwinds bought it! The free edition only accepts 5 devices. :( On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Dirk Bulinckx

Re: [SA-list] Feature Request?

I love kiwisyslog! However Solarwinds bought it! The free edition only accepts 5 devices. :(  On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Dirk Bulinckx mailto:d...@woodstone.nu)> wrote: Hi,     I did think about this a couple of years ago, but decided that there are other products that are better sui

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request?

Hi, I did think about this a couple of years ago, but decided that there are other products that are better suited for this. Also to be 100% honest :-) I was at that time a lot in contact with Andrew (from Kiwisyslog) and didn't want to compete with his great product. dirk --

Re: [TP-SPAM] - Re: [SA-list] Feature Request - Character set not allowed

: Saturday, July 10, 2010 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [TP-SPAM] - Re: [SA-list] Feature Request - Character set not allowed Sorry but Network Discovery is one of best features. This would save so much time adding checks. I don't know if most of your clients have not more than 2 servers. I think I

Re: [TP-SPAM] - Re: [SA-list] Feature Request - Character set not allowed

- Original Message - From: Mark Perry (mailto:mark.pe...@telephoneticsvip.co.uk) To: Servers Alive Discussion List (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu) Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 12:45 AM Subject: RE: [TP-SPAM] - Re: [SA-list] Feature Request - Character set not allowed Perfmon is fi

Re: [TP-SPAM] - Re: [SA-list] Feature Request - Character set not allowed

iscussion List (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu) Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 12:45 AM Subject: RE: [TP-SPAM] - Re: [SA-list] Feature Request - Character set not allowed Perfmon is fine if you are diagnosing a particular issue, not so good for alerting. One of the problems is that IT are

RE: [TP-SPAM] - Re: [SA-list] Feature Request - Character set not allowed

into other tools though I won’t mention what they are here. Don’t get me wrong SA still rules for simplicity! From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: 09 July 2010 18:31 To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [TP-SPAM] - Re: [SA-list

Re: [SA-list] Feature Request

Hi Jason, you're right about the timeout changes. I also agree that a DB is much better than a simple txt file. But to be clear I want those features inside the programm. Additional tools, addons and stuff like that is associated with additional work that I don't want. The perform counters are

Re: [SA-list] Feature Request

Also in my opinion Servers Alive is a network monitoring tool not a network discovery or networking mapping tool. I would rather see the developers continuing to focus on specific network monitoring tasks/types. Jason Passow Network Administrator Mississippi Welders Supply http://www.mwsco.co

Re: [SA-list] Feature Request

You can already change check timeout for groups or types of checks using the changes wizard. I would also like to offer my opinion that spending time on an autodiscover feature is less important than the current task of revamping the host file system. If the host file was a different file (

RE: [SA-list] feature request

lf Of Dirk Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:16 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] feature request Please take a look at the FIRST tab of an entry and you'll see that you can put it into temp maintenance. Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers A

RE: [SA-list] feature request

it to be in maintenance. Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Heath Abbate Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 5:15 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] feature request Exactly. Chris is on it. I wo

RE: [SA-list] feature request

Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Dirk Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 8:16 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] feature request Please take a look at the FIRST tab of an entry and you'll see that you can put it into temp maintenance. Dirk Bulin

Re: [SA-list] feature request

rvers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu] On > Behalf Of Dirk > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 9:16 AM > To: Servers Alive Discussion List > Subject: RE: [SA-list] feature request > > As said that is already in the product. > If you edit the entry you can

RE: [SA-list] feature request

Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] feature request I see two ways to put an item on maintenance - using a schedule, or manually setting an item on maintenance. If my maintenance period is one time, from 2:00 pm until 3:00 pm on Monday, I have to either configure the settings on the Schedul

RE: [SA-list] feature request

, the settings would remain. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Dirk Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 9:16 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] feature request As said that is already in the product. If you

RE: [SA-list] feature request

Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] feature request What about a "set it and forget it" maintenance mode - a temporary maintenance window instead of a permanent maintenance window. Put item X on maintenance during time frame Y. When the time frame has passed, the maintenance setting

RE: [SA-list] feature request

r the same time every week. Sometimes it isn't. Chris Mang>> JDA Software Group -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Dirk Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 8:41 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] featur

RE: [SA-list] feature request

euh that's already in the product Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Heath Abbate Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 6:56 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] feature request Timed maintenance w

RE: [SA-list] feature request

That's already possible in v6.2 Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:sal...@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Heath Abbate Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 11:40 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] feature request One thing I like in Nagios I don’t see in

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request: Escalation Management

Yet one more to our long lists of requests….. Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 5:35 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature Request: Escalation Management

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request: Escalation Management

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:05:17 -0600 Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature Request: Escalation Management You got it. Create a group of alerts independent of any specific entry, give it a name ("Mission Cri

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request: Escalation Management

hey would now be very easy to modify/maintain. -tom From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 10:01 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request: Escalation Management

If I understand it correctly you mean a option to create a group of alerts and then per entry you're able to "add 1 group of alerts" - "add alert(s)" - "-copy group of alerts". When adding the "group of alerts" then you can NOT change the individual alerts that are part of the group, for that s

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output

lease respond to Servers Alive Discussion List To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output a "delete from…" was added in the current beta build… http://beta.woodstone.nu Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussi

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output

ist 20/06/2008 12:10 Please respond to Servers Alive Discussion List To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output You mean more to the left? That means less space for the actual page name then… Dirk Bulinckx.

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output

Ian _ Ian K Gray OEL IS - European Infrastructure Support Tel: +44 1236 502661 Mob: +44 7881 518854 Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit "Dirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List 20/06/2008 12:10 Please respond to Servers Alive Discuss

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output

t;Dirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List 20/06/2008 09:40 Please respond to Servers Alive Discussion List To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output and were would you

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output

: Servers Alive Discussion List 20/06/2008 09:40 Please respond to Servers Alive Discussion List To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output and were would you put/place the option? Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Disc

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output

and were would you put/place the option? Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 10:31 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] Feature request: "Remove from..." output We ca

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: config backup

There is more then the registry part and the entries file. You also have the HTML templates…. I think that making a "backup" of the registry part and the entries file isn't that difficult. I'll have a look at it. Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request

* * Pete – this can already be done with the “Sort=” command in your html template. Check page 91(ish) of the doc. Barry From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request

kx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TP-Steen Berg Andersen Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 4:21 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature Request Sounds very cunning. Is this documented / explai

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request

You can already do this, by combining the interval and the priority of an entry. Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Bell Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 9:20 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: [SA-list] Feature Request

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

vers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 5:36 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files compares to the setting for log file. Naming of the log files is handled

Re: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

st [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)] On Behalf Of Mark Perry Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 5:16 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files In general date stamping the filename. Mark Perry Sy

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

on List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files In general date stamping the filename. Mark Perry Systems & Networks Administrator Telephonetics VIP Ltd “making sound business sense” Simply dial +44 (0)1442 242 242 and

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 03 December 2007 16:01 To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files Perhaps log files should be stored in a separate folder, and then an

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

They are stored in the directory that is "defined" by the user…. Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 5:01 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Featu

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

7881 518854 Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit "Dirk Bulinckx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List 03/12/2007 15:45 Please respond to Servers Alive Discussion List To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of lo

Re: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

(mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu) 03/12/2007 11:35 Please respond to Servers Alive Discussion List (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu) To Servers Alive Discussion List (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu) cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Feature req

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

rs Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files Personally I have a problem with that. I don't think that a software should delete its own log files. Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

ervers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: 03 December 2007 11:36 To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files Personally I have a problem with that. I don't think that a software should delete

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: limit number of log files

Personally I have a problem with that. I don't think that a software should delete its own log files. Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:21 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subj

Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7

cussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:01 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7 Create a new DB on the SA server. Log check results to that.This includes a

RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7

TECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 10:01 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7 Create a new DB on the SA server. Log check results to that.This includes all check results odbc, file count, ping, etc. Then you have his

Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7

ervers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:36 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7 I have been thinking about how to get a similar result. We monitor a

RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7

Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 3:36 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7 I have been thinking about how to get a similar result. We monitor a fax queue but since we are attempting t

RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7

dlecrk.com/) From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:36 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7 I have bee

Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7

ww.saddlecrk.com -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Viktor Sokol Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 5:11 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7 Hello Michael, IMO will be much faster to

RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7

(work) 863 665 1261 (fax) www.saddlecrk.com -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Viktor Sokol Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 5:11 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7 Hello Michael, IMO wi

Re: [SA-list] feature request for v7

Hello Michael, IMO will be much faster to setup additional alert(s) for each event "getting better" and "getting worse" depending on primary. Monday, April 9, 2007, 4:50:12 PM, you wrote: > > > Can I get an alert option for "and every time the result changes"? > > For example I have

RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7

AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7 so it's not ALL of them, it's a SELECTION of them? Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAI

RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7

, April 05, 2007 3:51 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7 The 2nd one. I develope the bizarre new check on my PC using the free version, but I need them appended into the the production SA box. So, it would be a select box that can open a "

RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7

://www.saddlecrk.com/) From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 9:41 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7 If this is like an "import" then how will you

RE: [SA-list] feature request for v7

feature request for v7 If this is like an "import" then how will you have create the "check related setup information"? OR do you mean that while SA already has an entries-file, that you are able to "open" another entries file and append that to the existing list of entries? Dirk Bulinck

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: XML output

That's something you can do via the HTML template based output. Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Hanson Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:46 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: XML output

Just to clarify, I wasn't referring to an export of the setup of the checks, but the results of a check cycle. Brett Hanson >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/22/2007 4:30:05 PM >>> We're already working on XML output. The XML output will contain all entries, with alerts, but also the people/team/protocols/

RE: [SA-list] Feature request: XML output

We're already working on XML output. The XML output will contain all entries, with alerts, but also the people/team/protocols/setup. Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Hanson Sent: Thursday, February 22, 20

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Bradshaw Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 6:56 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse Would that still work if there isn’t a cycle executing at 8:00 ex

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

Would that still work if there isn’t a cycle executing at 8:00 exactly? From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:46 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

inckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vogl, Tom Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 4:41 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse We could start with export, but the real power would

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

there normal checking time. Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Weigold, Greg Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 4:26 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 3:46 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

s Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:01 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse looking at it, it does not seem to be the type of schedule we'

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

February 05, 2007 10:01 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse looking at it, it does not seem to be the type of schedule we're using. With the CRON schedule you can say that it has to run on a specific day/hour/m

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

Dirk Bulinckx. From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 2:41 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse Here's a good

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

dlecrk.com/) From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 8:26 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

ry 05, 2007 2:11 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse Are you familiar with how cron jobs schedule on a *nix server? That's probably the most concise 'readable' schedule description. Plus, it's o

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

live Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 1:56 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse About the schedule (as that seems to be one of the things you "nee

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

Behalf Of Michael Shook Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:11 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse Thanks, this will really look good for the managers. You rock!!! Michael D. Shook Systems Analyst - Data Integrat

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

/) From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 3:46 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse YEAH! um, do you have a version eta? Maybe, dare I say, (dare!, dare!) version 7? Michael D. Shook Systems Analyst - Data Integration Saddle Creek

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

, Tom Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 8:01 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse Can I throw in my $.02 and ask for the config file to moved to an XML format - which will make it easier to parse/edit with external

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse Can I throw in my $.02 and ask for the config file to moved to an XML format - which will make it easier to parse/edit with external tools

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

Can I throw in my $.02 and ask for the config file to moved to an XML format - which will make it easier to parse/edit with external tools -Tom From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [SA-list] Feature request, was: Changing alert recipients en masse

Parts of this can already be done via the html output (template based). I know you would like more output of the entries/checks, but this is not something that can be done quickly. We have to clearly define how we're going to do it as it involves the complete setup of SA. Dirk Bulinckx.

Re: [SA-list] Feature Request

For what it's worth, I'd find that facility really useful too. Ian _ Ian K Gray OEL IS - European Infrastructure Support Tel: +44 1236 502661 Mob: +44 7881 518854 "Michael Letschin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List 31/01/2007 16:3

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 11:40 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Feature Request That's not something that is "on the radar". Why not put entries into maintenance while doing tests? That way they

RE: [SA-list] Feature Request

That's not something that is "on the radar". Why not put entries into maintenance while doing tests? That way they are not tested and the test-checking takes less long. Dirk Bulinckx. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... Ah, hadn't thought of doing the HTTP Get there. I was thinking along the lines of an "always" alert.   So, it's HTML Output, then Status Db, then Interchange Db, then exec. alerts?   Michael D. ShookTechnical AnalystSaddle Creek Corp

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

orationMichael.Shook@saddlecrk.com863 668 4477 (work)863 860 4070 (cell)863 665 1261 (fax)www.saddlecrk.com   From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 11:51 AMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-l

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

6 PMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... Also, I just realized, since the recap data I'm looking for isn't written to the HTML output until the end of the check process, any method I have of importing it into a db (HTTP GET for instance) wouldn

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

Thursday, June 29, 2006 4:36 AMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... Apologies I misread your message...   Although SQL Enterprise shouldn't take 'several' seconds to return result from 3 million... From: Servers Alive Dis

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... I'm not sure where you're going... I use MS SQL Enterprise for the DataBase logging...   Michael D. ShookTechnical AnalystSaddle Creek CorporationMichael.Shook@saddlecrk.com863 668 4477 (work)863 860 407

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:36 PMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... It can indeed be done via the app, but making change just for one user isn't realy the way

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 11:36 AMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... It can indeed be done via the app, but making change just for one user isn't realy the way we want to go. When/if we get to the re

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

utput.         Dirk Bulinckx.   From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael ShookSent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 5:06 PMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... ah, re-read your message again.   Yes I could do this, but this would re

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

BulinckxSent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:51 AMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... Not sure to understand. You can already get this info in the HTML output via a template, but you want the info in a db.  Why not use the HTML output to generate

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

  From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:51 AMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... Not sure to understand. You can already get this info in the HTML output

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark PerrySent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 10:36 AMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Feature request... Can you not Install MSDE or SQL Server Express 2005.   By Default you get 2

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

Title: Feature request... Not sure to understand. You can already get this info in the HTML output via a template, but you want the info in a db.  Why not use the HTML output to generate a "file" that can be posted via an HTTP post to the db?    Dirk Bulinckx.   From: Servers Alive Discus

RE: [SA-list] Feature request...

Title: Feature request... Can you not Install MSDE or SQL Server Express 2005.   By Default you get 2GB on MSDE (not sure about Express as I haven't used it)... From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael ShookSent: 28 June 2006 14:56To: Servers Aliv

[SA-list] Re: [SA-list] Feature Request - Repeat Find

I'll second that, and also add a request that "Match Case" be unchecked by default as well. Servers Alive Discussion List wrote on 05/05/2006 08:30:22 AM: > It might be nice to have a repeat find hot key. It is extremely > common for us to have multiple checks for one hostname. We try to > ke

[SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts

Discussion List   Subject: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts In v6, you will have an option called "MUTE ALERTS" in the context menu.  When it's "flagged" (checked) then we will not execute the

[SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:45 PMTo: Servers Alive Discussion ListSubject: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts Ah, ok. Given the purpose of this feature, I don't thi

[SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts

cussion List To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts I mean if you do "FILE-SAVE", close SA and re-open SA should it still have the same status (being ignore alerts).   A different c

[SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts

ubject: [SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts Not sure what you mean by "saved in the entries file" - do you mean remembered between sessions? Or visible on one of the tabs on the individual entry? I guess ideally yes to both. Certainly having it in the c

[SA-list] Re: [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts

live Discussion List cc Subject [SA-list] RE: [SA-list] Feature request: Silence Alerts Would this be a setting that is saved in the entries file too? Could this be something in the context menu (right click on entry) were you flag/unflag the option?     Dirk Bulinckx.   From: [EMAIL

  1   2   3   >