On 01/11/11 00:54, Jonathan Lang wrote:
Markus Krötzsch wrote:
I would like to give an aggregated reply to the discussions around having
formatting strings with {{{markers}}} to be part of #subobject declarations.
Decision: we will not implement this.
Reason: MediaWiki has templates for
On 30/10/11 21:43, Stephan Gambke wrote:
Hi Markus,
Am 30.10.2011 12:12, schrieb Markus Krötzsch:
Thanks. What I now implemented requires naming for all subobjects, so it
is not optional. One could have another parser function that does not
require a name; overloading #subobject to do both
Subobjects (aka internal objects) in SMW
Sorry for the late response.
Would it be reasonable to have the syntax be something like:
{{#subobject:name
| given=Jonathan
| family=Lang
| middle=LeRoy
| surname=Mr.
| {{{given}}} {{{middle}}} {{{family
-mediawiki.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 10:14 PM
To: jmccl...@hypergrove.com
Cc: 'Semediawiki-user'; 'Semantic MediaWiki developers'
Subject: Re: [SMW-devel] [Semediawiki-user] RFC Subobjects (aka
internal objects) in SMW
On 07/10/11 19:21, John McClure wrote:
Under #2 scenario
Updates on the subobject feature. The following changes have now been
implemented and committed to SVN.
== Parser function #subobject ==
The new parser function #subobject can be used to create *named*
subobjects. Example:
{{#subobject:My office address
| street name=Parks Road
|
Yury Katkov wrote:
Hi!
Are you sure about the syntax here? Those {{{Parameters}}} surrounded by
curly braces will conflict with template parameters, won't they?
Yes, they will: if you have a template parameter with the same name as a
subobject field, you will lose access to the template
Hi!
Are you sure about the syntax here? Those {{{Parameters}}} surrounded by
will conflict with template parameters, won't they?
Yury
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Jon Lang datawea...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for the late response.
Would it be reasonable to have the syntax be something
surrounded by curly brackets of course :)
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Yury Katkov katkov.ju...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi!
Are you sure about the syntax here? Those {{{Parameters}}} surrounded by
will conflict with template parameters, won't they?
Yury
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Jon
] RFC Subobjects (aka internal objects) in SMW
Sorry for the late response.
Would it be reasonable to have the syntax be something like:
{{#subobject:name
| given=Jonathan
| family=Lang
| middle=LeRoy
| surname=Mr.
| {{{given}}} {{{middle}}} {{{family
Was I talkling gibberish or was the RDF export question too hard? :)
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Yury Katkov katkov.ju...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Markus,
First of all, your alternative proposal looks much better than the
original one because of more flexibility. And praise you for the
Sorry for the late response.
Would it be reasonable to have the syntax be something like:
{{#subobject:name
| given=Jonathan
| family=Lang
| middle=LeRoy
| surname=Mr.
| {{{given}}} {{{middle}}} {{{family}}}
}}
{{#subobject:name
| given=Ranma
| family=Saotome
| {{{family}}} {{{given}}}
}}
This
Hello Markus,
First of all, your alternative proposal looks much better than the
original one because of more flexibility. And praise you for the great
solution of optional naming - I hope it will be possible to implement
it!
What about RDF export and Import vocabulary features? I have really
two
On 05/10/11 15:02, Gregor Hagedorn wrote:
Would these subobjects interfere at some stage with the support of
multi-value properties or replace them? Or will they remain an additional
feature like the SIOs?
Multi-valued properties in SMW 1.6 are already a special kind of
subobject. Both kinds
Would these subobjects interfere at some stage with the support of
multi-value properties or replace them? Or will they remain an additional
feature like the SIOs?
Multi-valued properties in SMW 1.6 are already a special kind of
subobject. Both kinds of subobject work well together (i.e.,
Overall it does 'feel tidier' to have a simple set of content pages
rather than many arbitrary 'data pages', but I'm just looking for a
way to quantify it. (After all, users are likely to stick to content
pages if that is where your site design keeps them).
Our arguments for using subobjects
On 03/10/11 19:22, Dan Bolser wrote:
On 3 October 2011 16:48, Markus Krötzschmar...@semantic-mediawiki.org
wrote:
On 03/10/11 10:50, Dan Bolser wrote:
...
Thanks Markus,
Perhaps a very dumb question, but what advantages are there to using
subobjects over real pages?
i.e. When is it
On 03/10/11 22:58, John McClure wrote:
Markus,
#subobject is great to hear about, though I look at
http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Version and I don't see it yet
listed as a parser function; is there a schedule in mind for public testing?
And I'm not understanding how records are
Following up the discussions we had at SMWCon in Berlin, we have now
implemented a new feature for internal objects in SMW. This email
explains this feature and starts the discussion on some open questions
for it to become stable.
== Goal ==
Allow SMW annotations to refer to objects that
On 3 October 2011 10:02, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
Following up the discussions we had at SMWCon in Berlin, we have now
implemented a new feature for internal objects in SMW. This email
explains this feature and starts the discussion on some open questions
for it to
Would these subobjects interfere at some stage with the support of
multi-value properties or replace them? Or will they remain an additional
feature like the SIOs?
Gu
On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:02:32 +0100, Markus Krötzsch
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
Following up the discussions we had at
On 03/10/11 10:50, Dan Bolser wrote:
...
Thanks Markus,
Perhaps a very dumb question, but what advantages are there to using
subobjects over real pages?
i.e. When is it recommended to use a subobject over a regular page?
(That is, disregarding peoples sensibilities over 'too many' or
On 03/10/11 11:48, zehetner wrote:
Would these subobjects interfere at some stage with the support of
multi-value properties or replace them? Or will they remain an additional
feature like the SIOs?
Multi-valued properties in SMW 1.6 are already a special kind of
subobject. Both kinds of
On 3 October 2011 16:48, Markus Krötzsch mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org wrote:
On 03/10/11 10:50, Dan Bolser wrote:
...
Thanks Markus,
Perhaps a very dumb question, but what advantages are there to using
subobjects over real pages?
i.e. When is it recommended to use a subobject over a
23 matches
Mail list logo
