[sipx-users] Enable and configure conference bridge between SipX and DimDim Webconference Service

2010-08-10 Thread Richard Wähnelt
Hi, first I would like to know if it is even possible (now as of SipX 4.2) to combine a DimDim WebConference with a conference held via local SipX Server. I'm planning on also bringing together an audio and a multimedia conference with just audio available to users of IP phones. So please

Re: [sipx-users] Enable and configure conference bridge between SipX and DimDim Webconference Service

2010-08-10 Thread Todd Hodgen
Dim Dim integration is already in the 4.2 release. It's not a real tight integration, more of a link between the two system. Enter your dim dim account information in your conference bridge is basically all you do. It creates links you can send to your conference invitee's, you click on your

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working

2010-08-10 Thread Claudio Succa
Il lunedì 09 agosto 2010 21:03:38 Tony Graziano ha scritto: You need to tell me what is in the field for the MOH uri in your phone config file. Copy and paste: sip:~~...@skoer.it -- Claudio Succa PERTEL - Torino - Italy +39-011-19826800 http://www.pertel.it http://www.uniassist.it

[sipx-users] Voicemail does not work after update - nullpointer exception in SipxIVR after update to 4.2.1

2010-08-10 Thread Rene Pankratz
Hello List members. I did the following steps in my update: updated my old SipX 4.0.4 to 4.2.1 and archived the Config Vm via webinterface. Then i did a clean install of Sipx 4.2.1-018930 and restored Config VM. Unfortunately the Voicemail system does not work any more. I can login but when I

Re: [sipx-users] Broadvox audio after 30 minutes...

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Picher
Gary, usually that problem is some sort of refer problem or the provider is sending calls in on 5060 instead of 5080. Mike On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Gary Luca garyluc...@gmail.com wrote: Tony, I'm using a SIP trunk through Broadvox with the default settings as shown below in your

Re: [sipx-users] Reset superadmin password failed

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Picher
That usually works fine. Were you able to get in, or was the superadmin password set to blank? On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Jun.Wen jun.wen.s...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I tried to reset superadmin password as the guide of “sipxconfig.sh --database reset-superadmin”. Whereas, after

Re: [sipx-users] Voicemail does not work after update - nullpointer exception in SipxIVR after update to 4.2.1

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Picher
Clean install from ISO? On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Rene Pankratz rene.pankratz.l...@iant.dewrote: Hello List members. I did the following steps in my update: updated my old SipX 4.0.4 to 4.2.1 and archived the Config Vm via webinterface. Then i did a clean install of Sipx

Re: [sipx-users] looking to change FROM line in voicemail

2010-08-10 Thread Abdul Mayat
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: aanlkti=adzj=lzq4of49d_2ymj4bwzes_sq06kq71...@mail.gmail.com X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 50157 Message-ID: c3ed.4c611...@forum.sipfoundry.org If in doubt take a

Re: [sipx-users] Voicemail does not work after update - nullpointer exception in SipxIVR after update to 4.2.1

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
Actually, I remember this I think... It had to do with extra xml settings in config that had not populated in VM settings, because there are more parameters than there were before. I believe a workaround I had at the time was to disable Vm for a user, then re-enable it. Can you try that for one

Re: [sipx-users] Voicemail does not work after update - nullpointer exception in SipxIVR after update to 4.2.1

2010-08-10 Thread Rene Pankratz
Yes, a clean install from ISO. Then restored config/voicemail in Webinterface. After cleaning up all /inbox directories in mailstore it seems to me the VM is acting correct right now. But I will do further testing to clarify that there is no further problem with VM. René 2010/8/10 Michael

Re: [sipx-users] Voicemail does not work after update - nullpointer exception in SipxIVR after update to 4.2.1

2010-08-10 Thread Rene Pankratz
I disabled and re-enabled voicemail for a few users. No failed job appeared in Webinterface. So I repeated the steps for all users. The VM Service started up without any errorsafter the update. The only error I could find is the one I posted in my first Post in this thread. Everything works fine

Re: [sipx-users] Blocking SIP URI Calls from the innternet

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
FWIW - roadmap for 5.0... Call Announce (aka Call Screening) Phase 2 will also include the classic Call Announce functionality. If the PA is front ending all calls then (based on user config), if the user chooses the option to transfer to the user, the caller is prompted to record his/her name.

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Claudio Succa
Il martedì 10 agosto 2010 11:35:27 Claudio Succa ha scritto: Following your suggestions I changed the moh in the snom phone to sip:~~...@sip.skoer.it and now it works. There is another problem about snom configuration. The default codecs order is: Codec 1 G.711u Codec 2 G.711a Codec 3 G.722

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
The media server supports g722 as well as g771u/a. What would be interesting to know is why in your case you need to change the order of codecs. During a media negotiation, at least several codecs should be offered before an agreement is made. Internally it should never be an issue. On gateway

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Claudio Succa
Il martedì 10 agosto 2010 12:33:21 Tony Graziano ha scritto: The media server supports g722 as well as g771u/a. What would be interesting to know is why in your case you need to change the order of codecs. During a media negotiation, at least several codecs should be offered before an

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
I think this is more like the way snom DOES NOT truly resolve DNS SRV records properly. example: internally you use a private DNS server (or acl that uses views), for this you add an A record to DNS that uses sipx or another internal DNS server so the phone can resolve sipdomain.com as the same

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Claudio Succa
Il martedì 10 agosto 2010 16:36:06 Tony Graziano ha scritto: I think this is more like the way snom DOES NOT truly resolve DNS SRV records properly. example: internally you use a private DNS server (or acl that uses views), for this you add an A record to DNS that uses sipx or another

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Claudio Succa
Il martedì 10 agosto 2010 18:32:22 Tony Graziano ha scritto: How are you connecting to the pstn? Siptrunk or gateway? Siptrunk If trunk is the itsp sending to you on port 5060 or 5080? 5080 -- Claudio Succa PERTEL - Torino - Italy +39-011-19826800 http://www.pertel.it

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
your sbc routes page looks like this? SIPPublic portSet this if your ITSP requires a specific port. External port(Default: 5080)The ITSP facing port. The ITSP will send signaling here. Signaling keep-alive interval(Default: 20)Keepalive timer for SIP Signaling. sipXbridge will re-register with

[sipx-users] sipx-users channel on IRC?

2010-08-10 Thread Jim Canfield
I there any interest in a sipx-users channel on IRC. Maybe I'm old school, but IRC has always been a great way to collaborate and get people involved with sipXecs. Just a thought. -Jim ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Claudio Succa
Il martedì 10 agosto 2010 19:02:03 Tony Graziano ha scritto: your sbc routes page looks like this? There are two differences: Permitted Codecs is void and Incoming calls destination has an alias where to send inbound calls. Filling the Permitted Codes with its default does not change the

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Norman Branitsky
On 10-08-10 10:36 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: *ATTN: Snom guru's, wasn't there some configuration nuance with Snom's that related to the port number (i.e. port=0 meant use SRV records, while manually encoding port 5060 meant ignore srv records? Or something like that?* You are thinking of

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
thanks for the memory jog! On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Norman Branitsky nor...@cherniaksoftware.com wrote: On 10-08-10 10:36 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: *ATTN: Snom guru's, wasn't there some configuration nuance with Snom's that related to the port number (i.e. port=0 meant use SRV

Re: [sipx-users] sipx-users channel on IRC?

2010-08-10 Thread Douglas Hubler
there is plenty of room on #sipx, i often wish there was only one mailing list. On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Jim Canfield jcanfi...@emstar.com wrote: I there any interest in a sipx-users channel on IRC.  Maybe I'm old school, but IRC has always been a great way to collaborate and get

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
Perhaps you want to put the codecs back in. PCMU,PCMA,G722,L16 If all calls are going to a predefined destination, that's fine. I would limit the codecs allowed at sipxbridge, for simplicity sake. I think it might be problematic that either the ITSP or snom (or both) are negotiating codecs that

Re: [sipx-users] Question regarding Audio Codes and Freeswitch media

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
(I'd like to hear Josh's response to this) A log snippet from the gateway would be good too. It sounds like disconnect supervision, but does the call show active while you think you are recording it in the CDR table? If you think you are recording it but you get DEAD SILENCE is one thing. Can you

Re: [sipx-users] Registering Endpoints

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
Any help apprecaited! I amusing this: http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_Xten_SIP_softphones_with_sipX From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Ujjval Karihaloo Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 8:19 PM To:

Re: [sipx-users] Registering Endpoints

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
Try to start using the new wiki http://wiki.sipfoundry.org http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/xecsuser/Configuring+Counterpath+X-Lite+Softphone What you will want to do is use the SIPDOMAIN you used when setting up sipx using the install script. ex: if your sip domain is simplesignal.com and

Re: [sipx-users] MOH not working [SOLVED]

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
according to snom they only support G.711, G.729A, G.723.1, G.722, G.726, GSM 6.10 (full rate) on that device. your itsp is making offers not even in that list. I'm guessing that is an issue but I still need a useable siptrace to see enough. PCMU,PCMA,G722 should be the list in your sipxbridge

Re: [sipx-users] Registering Endpoints

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
Got it..have it working.. Appreciate your expertise! From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 12:36 PM To: Ujjval Karihaloo Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Registering Endpoints Try to start using the new wiki

[sipx-users] Calling Toll Free #s failing after 4.2.1 Update

2010-08-10 Thread Tran, Ly V.
Just noticed that we are unable to make any outbound calls to toll free numbers after this latest update. We were able to on the previous version. We are using Voxitas as the ITSP. Has anyone else seen this or tested TFN dialing after the update? Normal local and long distance phone calls

Re: [sipx-users] Calling Toll Free #s failing after 4.2.1 Update

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 8/10/10 3:14 PM, Tran, Ly V. wrote: Just noticed that we are unable to make any outbound calls to toll free numbers after this latest update. We were able to on the previous version. We are using Voxitas as the ITSP. Has anyone else seen this or tested TFN dialing after the update?

Re: [sipx-users] Calling Toll Free #s failing after 4.2.1 Update

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
Well, it would help to know what your gateway is doing and how your dialing rules work. I don't use voxitas so I can't help with anything that might be peculiar there. Is your gateway set to add any digits to all call through the gateway? Is you dialplan doing this either? Do you have a separate

Re: [sipx-users] Calling Toll Free #s failing after 4.2.1 Update

2010-08-10 Thread Tran, Ly V.
I am using the same gateway with Voxitas for local, LD and tollfree. Because they are using +1, I've set up the dial plan as you suggested to enable dialing from the missed calls on the phone since the incoming caller ID shows +1 as well. I have a basic dial plan of 10 digits, 1 appended then

Re: [sipx-users] Calling Toll Free #s failing after 4.2.1 Update

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
Well, the rule to take +1 at the gateway should be removed and +1 should be added to the individual dialplans or if your gateway does not require registration you can create anotgher instance of it and not add +1 and send 10 digit toll free calls to that gateway. Or you can get a voip.ms account

[sipx-users] Auto Attendant setup

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
Whats the most common way to route a call based on incoming 10 digit DID to a particular Auto Attendant (AA) Cannot find the info on the latest wiki on setting up the AA. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive:

Re: [sipx-users] Auto Attendant setup

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
It an alias for the AA in the dial plan. Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 Fax: 434.984.8431 Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 Fax: 434.984.8427 Helpdesk Contract Customers:

Re: [sipx-users] Auto Attendant setup

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
You got it ... Thx man -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 3:41 PM To: Ujjval Karihaloo; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Auto Attendant setup It an alias for the AA in the dial plan.

[sipx-users] sipX Recordings

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
All the SIPX default announcements, AA, Conferencing etc seem to have choppy Audio. Is it the Media path or the announcements themselves that need to be professionally re-recorded if we were to use sipX in a Production environment. What do most users out there do?

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Recordings

2010-08-10 Thread Michal Bielicki
How about making sure you have: a: no virtualization madness b: proper hardware (proper clocking, proper bus and enough RAM) Am 11.08.2010 um 00:18 schrieb Ujjval Karihaloo: All the SIPX default announcements, AA, Conferencing etc seem to have choppy Audio. Is it the Media path or the

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Recordings

2010-08-10 Thread Matthew Kitchin (Public)
Is your server virtual? -Original Message- From: Ujjval Karihaloo ujj...@simplesignal.com Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:18:52 To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.orgsipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: [sipx-users] sipX Recordings

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Recordings

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
That usually indicates a resource issue. If you are using a softphone it could be on the pc or the audio device on the pc. I never install sipx with less than 4gb of ram. I rarely do a virtual server and when I do I make sure kernel timing, ram and storage access are configured so they give the

[sipx-users] P-Asserted ID

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
Can I send P-Assert-ID over the SIP trunk so that which ever extension is calling their username gets send over the user portion of u...@domain in the PAID. So that would mean wild carding the user portion of the PAID E.g. I have extention with username - 1234 In the SIP Trunk ITSP setting

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Recordings

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
I have 4Gig RAM, No Virtualization... I am using a softphone..will try a Polycom Any guidance on setting up clocking ? From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Ujjval Karihaloo Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 5:08 PM To: Michal

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Recordings

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
Kernel timesync is really only an issue if running on a virtual platform. A good usb headset is important. Run top -U sipxchange Are you using any swap? When you are listening to audio does it show a high cpu usage? On 8/10/10, Ujjval Karihaloo ujj...@simplesignal.com wrote: I have 4Gig RAM,

Re: [sipx-users] P-Asserted ID

2010-08-10 Thread Douglas Hubler
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ujjval Karihaloo ujj...@simplesignal.com wrote: So if 1234 make a outbound call over the SIP trunk, sipX sends PAID in the INVIT as following 1...@mydomain.com latest 4.2.1 stable release, you'll see ability to control PAD on ITSP settings. Even works if user

Re: [sipx-users] P-Asserted ID

2010-08-10 Thread Tony Graziano
I'm guessing this is to capture detail for a billing platform running on a switch? On 8/10/10, Ujjval Karihaloo ujj...@simplesignal.com wrote: Can I send P-Assert-ID over the SIP trunk so that which ever extension is calling their username gets send over the user portion of u...@domain in the

Re: [sipx-users] P-Asserted ID

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
Yes Looks like sipX sends the itspusern...@itsp Address in the FROM header... And PAID has the individual users User Id as follows use...@a.b.c.d (or 1...@1.2.3.4 in my example below) where a.b.c.d is the IP of the sipX server itself. I want PAID to look like use...@itsp-provider-address(Like

[sipx-users] success. wav to mp3 in email

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Scheidell
not pretty, but works. installed postfix and switch-mail so I could redirect the email to a local (on sipx) account without changing the headers used procmailrc (already installed) to collect the headers and then call the script. installed lame to convert wav to mp3 (rpm), some might want to

Re: [sipx-users] P-Asserted ID

2010-08-10 Thread Martin Steinmann
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Ujjval Karihaloo ujj...@simplesignal.com wrote: So if 1234 make a outbound call over the SIP trunk, sipX sends PAID in the INVIT as following 1...@mydomain.com latest 4.2.1 stable release, you'll see ability to control PAD on ITSP settings. Even works if user

Re: [sipx-users] success. wav to mp3 in email

2010-08-10 Thread Martin Steinmann
You are amazing JJava programmers out there have mercy with this soul. --martin From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Michael Scheidell Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:19 PM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org users

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Recordings

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
No, Did not see any spikes in CPU...I was not using too much swap either... I believe it cud be my softphoneEyebeam running G722...cud be the culprit..I will try G711u -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 5:15

Re: [sipx-users] sipX Recordings

2010-08-10 Thread Ujjval Karihaloo
Actually for a single call going into an AA, this seems high to me.. Tasks: 167 total, 1 running, 165 sleeping, 0 stopped, 1 zombie Cpu(s): 14.3%us, 1.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 83.7%id, 0.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.3%si, 0.0%st Mem: 1035080k total, 1008672k used,26408k free,79428k buffers Swap: