Re: [sipx-users] yet another change to builds

2010-10-28 Thread David Becker
Can you update the ede scripts to use these new addresses? Am 27.10.2010 06:06, schrieb Douglas Hubler: I apologize for moving builds around as much as i am, i'm trying to preserve migration paths where i can and create a system that usable going forward. On that note, i created a couple pages

Re: [sipx-users] yet another change to builds

2010-10-28 Thread Michal Bielicki
We can add that but EDE is more or less EOL and most developers most hated. There is a page on how to do it all very simply by installing the deps and than using standard make instead of all the ede mania, especialy with 'git clean -fdx' being available that gets you back to the start. David

Re: [sipx-users] yet another change to builds

2010-10-28 Thread Rene Pankratz
Michal, I tried searching that page but couldn't find it in the wiki. Can you please provide us a link to that page? Regards 2010/10/28 Michal Bielicki michal.bieli...@seventhsignal.de We can add that but EDE is more or less EOL and most developers most hated. There is a page on how to do it

Re: [sipx-users] yet another change to builds

2010-10-28 Thread Michal Bielicki
I'll try to finish it tonight and make it public. Currently at the doctor because of a caraccident my wife had so slightly off work. Rene Pankratz rene.pankratz.l...@iant.de schrieb: Michal, I tried searching that page but couldn't find it in the wiki. Can you please provide us a link to that

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple IP or NICs on a sipX box

2010-10-28 Thread Abdul Mayat
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Organization: SipXecs Forum In-Reply-To: aanlktimrwx5+i0ydnuqyyvkq18o3j=_tvdxij5yfy...@mail.gmail.com X-FUDforum: 08063afcdd00a6e76393c5b9527381e8 53807 Message-ID: d22f.4cc94...@forum.sipfoundry.org Hi Michael, Its not

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Picher
Try a 'yum clean all' before the 'yum update' On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:51 AM, Bryan Anderson branderso...@msn.comwrote: So with the above mentioned URL I got 404 not found, removed the i386/ at the end and got this: Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
and if that doesnt work, consider removing the current sipx repo on your system and wget http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/sipxecs-centos.repo this one and try it On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@gmail.com wrote: Try a 'yum clean all' before the 'yum update'

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple IP or NICs on a sipX box

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Picher
I can see the usefulness of that... If I were going to that level I guess I'd just use a firewall to control access to SSH and also to block any unneeded ports. Hopefully we'll get at that point in version 5.0. Again, you're not the first to ask for it, but usually somebody wants to stick one

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple IP or NICs on a sipX box

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
... and I never put a sip server interface directly on the internet. If I have that much infrastructure I need to connect to I'd get a commercial SBC or firewall that is SIP capable to do that, so I can truly protect it and manage it. Exposing a PBX to every nook and cranny of a network with

[sipx-users] SipX stops working

2010-10-28 Thread Andreas Speck
Hi there, We have SipX-4.2.1-018971.dhubler 2010-08-21T04:59:18 build34 running on our system. This morning, when I came into the office, it suddenly had stopped working over night. This happened before, and - I have no idea why - it started working again two days later... I can login into

Re: [sipx-users] SipX stops working

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
you should inspect your proxy and registrar logs for indications it was receiving too many registration attempts from an outside script. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Andreas Speck andr...@wri-irg.org wrote: Hi there, We have SipX-4.2.1-018971.dhubler 2010-08-21T04:59:18 build34 running

[sipx-users] Valcom VIP-201 not receiving calls or pages

2010-10-28 Thread Danny Shay
I have a VIP-201 that is properly registering with the server, but it does not receive pages as part of the page group. I made another page group with just the valcom in the group and it does not play the page either. When I called the box's extension directly it went straight to voice mail.

Re: [sipx-users] Valcom VIP-201 not receiving calls or pages

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
You don't send it pages as part of a page group. VIP's do use the alert-info header. All you can do is call them, they go off hoook. They do not interpret info type headers to determine what to do, since the only thing they do is go off hook. Disable voicemail, but then dial the extension is the

Re: [sipx-users] Valcom VIP-201 not receiving calls or pages

2010-10-28 Thread Danny Shay
I have used this configuration for several other SIP based solutions, so I thought my standard config was a good starting point. Can you give me help on proper configuration for Sipx? Danny From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf

Re: [sipx-users] Valcom VIP-201 not receiving calls or pages

2010-10-28 Thread Jim Canfield
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Danny Shay ds...@norlemtc.com wrote: I have a VIP-201 that is properly registering with the server, but it does not receive pages as part of the page group.  I made another page group with just the valcom in the group and it does not play the page either.  When

Re: [sipx-users] Garrett County Fax

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
I agree partially with Xerox. ANYTIME you have (essentially) code/decode mutliples time to get in and out, you create a potential failure. IF IT WERE ME, and it is not... 1. Create a rule in the patton for the #'s for the FAX to send directly to a sip fxs gateway with t.38 (think smartnode 4500

Re: [sipx-users] Garrett County Fax

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Picher
Additionally... why are they even talking about T.38? Aren't you going to them on an analog connection? On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@gmail.com wrote: Dittos... Take the NEC out of the picture. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Tony Graziano

Re: [sipx-users] Garrett County Fax

2010-10-28 Thread Jim Canfield
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@gmail.com wrote: Dittos...  Take the NEC out of the picture. Nate...I think that is a big fat Told you so! ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive:

Re: [sipx-users] Valcom VIP-201 not receiving calls or pages [SOLVED]

2010-10-28 Thread Danny Shay
Update: I called Valcom and they said they had problems getting Sipx to work properly with the VIP-201. He sent me a firmware update (v2.15, I had 2.13) which I applied and then tested. It now works when I call the extension and it also works when used in a paging group. No configuration

Re: [sipx-users] Valcom VIP-201 not receiving calls or pages [SOLVED]

2010-10-28 Thread Jim Canfield
Interesting. So you can page every time in the page group? If so, that's great news! On Oct 28, 2010 9:29 AM, Danny Shay ds...@norlemtc.com wrote: Update: I called Valcom and they said they had problems getting Sipx to work properly with the VIP-201. He sent me a firmware update (v2.15, I had

Re: [sipx-users] Valcom VIP-201 not receiving calls or pages [SOLVED]

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
It's easy for me to beat on them, they are a few minutes from my brother's house and I get crazy when I visit my brother. Nice that someone down there listens! On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Jim Canfield jcanfi...@emstar.com wrote: Interesting. So you can page every time in the page group?

Re: [sipx-users] Garrett County Fax

2010-10-28 Thread Nathaniel Watkins
Yes - I was confused about why then mentioned T.38 as well - it's not going to IP at all - but I just figured they knew what they were talking about... You figure Xerox would have a pretty good handle on faxing...maybe not so much... From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple IP or NICs on a sipX box

2010-10-28 Thread Paul Herron
Mike, Weren’t you working with iptables on Sipx to limit access to management and admin functions as Abdul requests? ... and I never put a sip server interface directly on the internet. If I have that much infrastructure I need to connect to I'd get a commercial SBC or

Re: [sipx-users] Garrett County Fax

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
At some point the last poster from them obviously talked to their site tech who went there and learned it (PRI gateway) was a data connected device. In any event, POTS lines are the only thing analog faxes are made to work on, and that is, ultimately, their point. 1. Get a POTS line and put the

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Bryan Anderson
Clean All worked. Now Instant messanger is failing to start. It reports: Standard output - Starting openfire: - Starting openfire On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Michael Picher mpic...@gmail.com wrote: Try a 'yum clean all' before the 'yum update' On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:51

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
disable role, restart svc, enable role restart svc. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Bryan Anderson branderso...@msn.comwrote: Clean All worked. Now Instant messanger is failing to start. It reports: Standard output - Starting openfire: - Starting openfire On Thu, Oct 28, 2010

[sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread Matt White
Anybody have a tiny vpn device that can sit in front of a remote workers phone? We only want to secure the phone through VPN. I've used the Zywall P1 a few years back but can't find them anymore. -M ___ sipx-users mailing list

Re: [sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
(should setup an openvpn server and give the snom 8xx series with their openvpn client a go) 1. OPENVPN Server - 200 dollar pfsense appliance (low wattage) doing site-to-site vpn. Plug phone into appliance. 2. Overkill, but it is there now and will route what you want. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Bryan Anderson
@Michael - What do you have for phone service? nexvortex or some one/thing else? On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote: disable role, restart svc, enable role restart svc. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Bryan Anderson

Re: [sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
What VPN server is it connecting to? On 10/28/2010 10:56 AM, Matt White wrote: Anybody have a tiny vpn device that can sit in front of a remote workers phone? We only want to secure the phone through VPN. I've used the Zywall P1 a few years back but can't find them anymore. -M

Re: [sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread Matt White
Yeah, they already have a large investment in Polycom handsets. Really looking for a portable, plug and go vpn device. We have multiple vpn devices, (ipsec, sslvpn etc) at the home office but need something users can move around and plug in and go. Still trying to get a hold of some

Re: [sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread Matt White
We have an Astaro VPN head capable of most vpn protocols, SSL, IPSEC, Cisco, PPTP etc. It works with openvpn, liksys, cisco's etc. -M On 10/28/2010 at 12:08 PM, in message 4cc9a007.2090...@gmail.com, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com wrote: What VPN server is it

Re: [sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
wouldn openwrt do this too? On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Matt White mwh...@thesummit-grp.comwrote: We have an Astaro VPN head capable of most vpn protocols, SSL, IPSEC, Cisco, PPTP etc. It works with openvpn, liksys, cisco's etc. -M On 10/28/2010 at 12:08 PM, in message

[sipx-users] Adding second route

2010-10-28 Thread m...@grounded.net
Are there any problems with adding a second route to sipx? For example, I have a box which has it's gateway as 192.168.1.6 but I need it's port 8443 traffic to reply to 192.168.1.1. In fact, I need only the web interface to reply to 192.168.1.1, everything else remains 192.168.1.6. The system

Re: [sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)
Absolutely. We use openwrt with many of these VPN clients. I recommend this router http://www.buffalotech.com/products/wireless/nfiniti-wireless-n/nfiniti-wireless-n-high-power-router-access-point-wzr-hp-g300nh/ with openwrt firmware. It has plenty of storage and horsepower. On 10/28/2010 11:13

Re: [sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread m...@grounded.net
 wouldn openwrt do this too? Ever use the pfsense openvpn module Tony? Would eliminate a lot of the crummy router issues by using vpn enabled devices. Then again, I guess it still ends up being the same as putting something in between their provider and router else have to deal with their

Re: [sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
I use openvpn on pfsense, works fine. Problem is you need an openvpn client too. With an appliance you would need IPSEC so it auto connects or s site-to-site or automated connection to the HOST from the USER. What you dont want id the user to have to login to a router and initiate the

Re: [sipx-users] tiny vpn device for remote workers

2010-10-28 Thread m...@grounded.net
 With an appliance you would need IPSEC so it auto connects or s site-to-  site or automated connection to the HOST from the USER.  What you dont want id the user to have to login to a router and initiate  the connection. If they are using a software based phone that's not an  issue. So not

Re: [sipx-users] Valcom VIP-201 not receiving calls or pages [SOLVED]

2010-10-28 Thread Todd Hodgen
Danny, a link to that firmware on the wiki would be helpful for others that experience that same issue. -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Danny Shay Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 7:30 AM To:

Re: [sipx-users] Inbound Verizon Callers

2010-10-28 Thread Bryan Anderson
Ok, so YAY my server is up to date now. Although still having Verizon wireless issues, and still can't get the instant messenger service to stay running, although right now that is not a concern for us. Bryan On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Bryan Anderson branderso...@msn.comwrote: @Michael

Re: [sipx-users] Valcom VIP-201 not receiving calls or pages [SOLVED]

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
Solved but not answered -- does this answer every time in either mode (direct dialing or page group now). If so, a wiki page on configuring might be a good idea with a link or notice with the firmware version that ought to be applied to it. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Todd Hodgen

Re: [sipx-users] Multiple IP or NICs on a sipX box

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Picher
I started working on that but haven't had time to spend on it recently. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Paul Herron p...@sagecraftsmen.comwrote: Mike, Weren’t you working with iptables on Sipx to limit access to management and admin functions as Abdul requests? ... and I never

[sipx-users] CDR report: from?

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Scheidell
trying to look up (a spam caller) who has called several of our DID's tried to use the 'From' drop down field. put in the number (nothing shows up) put in the CNAM, nothing shows up, put in (it is appears on CIDR report) CNAM - number nothing shows up. yes, if I select 'all' for same period,

Re: [sipx-users] CDR report: from?

2010-10-28 Thread George Niculae
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: trying to look up (a spam caller) who has called several of our DID's tried to use the 'From' drop down field. put in the number (nothing shows up) put in the CNAM, nothing shows up, put in (it is appears

Re: [sipx-users] CDR report: from?

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
but if you want instant karma, just do the reportcall hostory and download to csv or whatever and parse however you need to get the information you need now. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:17 PM, George Niculae geo...@ezuce.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:36 PM, Michael Scheidell

Re: [sipx-users] CDR report: from?

2010-10-28 Thread George Niculae
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Tony Graziano tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net wrote: but if you want instant karma, just do the reportcall hostory and download to csv or whatever and parse however you need to get the information you need now. Yup, better than looking into CDR db. Raised

Re: [sipx-users] CDR report: from?

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 10/28/10 6:23 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: but if you want instant karma, just do the reportcall hostory and download to csv or whatever and parse however you need to get the information you need now. An internal error has occurred. Click here to continue. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o:

Re: [sipx-users] CDR report: from?

2010-10-28 Thread Tony Graziano
Doesn't do that for me. H. What does sipxconfig.log say? On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: On 10/28/10 6:23 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: but if you want instant karma, just do the reportcall hostory and download to csv or whatever and

Re: [sipx-users] CDR report: from?

2010-10-28 Thread George Niculae
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Michael Scheidell michael.scheid...@secnap.com wrote: On 10/28/10 6:23 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: but if you want instant karma, just do the reportcall hostory and download to csv or whatever and parse however you need to get the information you need now. An

Re: [sipx-users] CDR report: from?

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 10/28/10 6:57 PM, George Niculae wrote: SELECT callee_aor FROM cdrs WHERE caller_aor LIKE '%PORTFOLIO%'; that worked. interesting googling the number. company buys 10 YEAR OLD DEBT and tries to talk the person answering it to start paying. (several class action lawsuits also) they

[sipx-users] Remote Registrations

2010-10-28 Thread Roman Gelfand
My sipx server is behind nat fortigate firewall. I am using bridged configuration. I have disabled sip helpers. I have published sip protocol to wan. I am successfully registering x-lite phone over wan. When I call an internal number, I hear ringing. However, when the phone is picked up,