Re: [sipx-users] Initial release: sipXecs 4.6.0

Congrats all. I miss working with this stuff. Not an option at my new job. I stayed subscribed to the list because I still enjoy some of the technical discussion. -Matthew On 12/5/2012 11:29 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > I'm pleased to announce sipXecs release 4.6.0. There will most > certainly

Re: [sipx-users] voice to text

Whatever Comcast is using is "usable". It attached the WAV file was well. Usually, the text is close enough, and I listen to the WAV file if I need more detail. On 9/11/2012 7:20 AM, Nathaniel Watkins wrote: Agreed -- once the technology matures, this will be a great feature -- until then, i

Re: [sipx-users] 4.4 ACD pickup Beep

We had dedicated lines for our ACD enabled handsets. They also had a direct assigned extension. Our support agents had a reason to have both. I didn't realize it might or might not have helped with potential issues. Our server was (it is still doing the job, I'm just not with that company any m

Re: [sipx-users] 4.4 ACD pickup Beep

Despite what others said, I had no problems transferring out of the old ACD either. We had a help desk that handled 110 medical facilities and handled thousands of calls. We didn't have any reliability problems. There were some minor options that weren't there, and it got completely destroyed (

Re: [sipx-users] Sipxconfig-report

See this. I think it can be removed unless you are using the older ACD. http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-7883 On 2/2/2012 1:52 PM, Bryan Anderson wrote: I am just kind of curious on this one. What does /usr/bin/sipxconfig-report do that is scheduled in a cron job? thanks, -Bryan Anders

[sipx-users] so long.. for now

To the huge number (okay, maybe 2 or 3) people I have helped on this list. I'm moving on to a new company that uses a Cisco hosted VoIP solution. I will no longer be working with Sipx and not really be able to contribute anything to the project. I wanted to thank everyone on here for the all the

Re: [sipx-users] ssl web certificate

This is how I do it in 4.4 with Microsoft certificate services. I had to make sure the cert server was 2008 (R2 I think) and create a template that does both server and user certs. mkdir $HOME/sslkeys cd $HOME/sslkeys /usr/bin/ssl-cert/gen-ssl-keys.sh --csr Country Name (2 letter code) [] : US

Re: [sipx-users] What the devil? Strange chopping sounds...

I think it is because it is virtual I saw the same thing. I think it is becuase more services were moved to freeswitch in 4.4 and freeswitch is showing these symptoms. I believe this is the issue: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2010-March/054412.html On 1/18/2012 8:54 AM,

Re: [sipx-users] sipxecs on vmware?

The only time I experience garbled audio is on recorded voice (VM, AA, etc). I think this maybe the culprit: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2010-March/054412.html On 1/4/2012 11:58 AM, Tony Graziano wrote: (because faxes using t.38 are able to recover from latency and ji

[sipx-users] Play message and then drop call

To comply with a legal ruling, I have to have a particular number play a message, and then terminate the call. No VM or anything else like that. What would you think the best way to do this would be? I am supposed to get it done today, and I have a busy system. I believe I could do this with the

Re: [sipx-users] Wifi VOIP phones and sipXecs

The Spectralink 8400s work perfectly. I started a wiki page for them, http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Configuring+Polycom+Spectralink+8400+WiFi+phones but I have been slammed since my company was purchased and I have not had time to finish it. I can assist in getting you going on one if

Re: [sipx-users] automate CDR reports...

I do it, but it may not be the most elegant way. I have different files for each extension I run a report for. Here is one: psql -H -d SIPXCDR -U postgres -c "select caller_aor,callee_aor,start_time AT TIME ZONE 'GMT' as "Start_Time",end_time AT TIME ZONE 'GMT' as "End_Time",end_time-start_tim

Re: [sipx-users] Appliance Hardware

I've put about 15 of these into production. http://www.logicsupply.com/products/atom_gs_l05 On 10/7/2011 10:51 AM, Geoff Van Brunt wrote: > I was wondering if anyone had any recommendations on hardware for SipX > in a small (15 user) deployment. I'm looking for something small, quiet, > and wall m

[sipx-users] Fwd: Call dropping - close to 30 minutes in

-0500 From: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software I am running 4.2.1 - sipXconfig (4.2.1-018971 2010-08-17T02:20:18 build20) Polycom 450s and 550s with 3.2.4 firmware No firewall No IP NAT Sipxbridge with Verizon VoIP services 180 users at this site

Re: [sipx-users] Call dropping - close to 30 minutes in

s it hangs up in about > a half an hour... there was extensive work done in 4.4 regarding > sipxbridge, but not sure if the timer behavior is affected. > > You could always just artifically increase the time beyond 1800 and if > they accept it you run around the 1800 limit, but you

[sipx-users] Call dropping - close to 30 minutes in

I am running 4.2.1 - sipXconfig (4.2.1-018971 2010-08-17T02:20:18 build20) Polycom 450s and 550s with 3.2.4 firmware No firewall No IP NAT Sipxbridge with Verizon VoIP services 180 users at this site, no remote workers Sipx server: 10.87.20.5 Caller ID on all outbound calls is 6157778201 I know I

Re: [sipx-users] Favorite ITSP... sorry to beat a dead horse

Thanks all. I will get quotes from Broadvox and Appia. On 9/20/2011 1:31 PM, Matt White wrote: > We use Voxitas/Appia > > They have been very good over the last 3-4 years. > > On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 12:55 -0500, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) > wrote: >> I'm trying to

Re: [sipx-users] Favorite ITSP... sorry to beat a dead horse

crossing, etc. if you're less serious but it's still important check out your local clec's. in either case i'd recommend an ingate for compatibility as the major players will recognize it and have certified against it. On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Matthew Kitchin (pu

Re: [sipx-users] Favorite ITSP... sorry to beat a dead horse

com> works. there is a list in templates. beyond that it is an ask andsee thing. On Sep 20, 2011 2:05 PM, "Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)" mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Thanks. Are there any large players that are known to work directly with > Sipx? I'd

Re: [sipx-users] Favorite ITSP... sorry to beat a dead horse

ecommend an ingate for compatibility as the major players will recognize it and have certified against it. On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com>> wrote: I'm trying to make some recommendations to a company as to what

[sipx-users] Favorite ITSP... sorry to beat a dead horse

I'm trying to make some recommendations to a company as to what ITSP to use. I've almost always been locked into Verizon. I wanted to see if Voip.ms was the overall favorite, or if it is something else. The only other non Verizon install I did was about 1.5 years ago. I used bandwidth.com then

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom

and that >> documentation is in your hands for connecting it up. >> >> >> >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin >> (public/usenet) >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 20

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom

with voip.Ms is that they have automated failover per number. At the same time you would need to address firewall needs for each site versus the cost for a pri gateway(s). Voip.Ms has a how to for sipx on their wiki now. On Monday, September 5, 2011, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mailto:mkitc

[sipx-users] CentOS 5.7 released

CentOS 5.7 released http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2011-September/017727.html Just an FYI in case someone does a yum update and gets more than they expected. ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400 (and 3.3 firmware) - Success!

100% success now. I have the codec config issue resolved. Everything works well for me. I will document on the wiki. On 8/31/2011 6:39 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote: I will. I have 1 last thing to figure out. Outbound calls are defaulting to g711 and I want them to default to g729.

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom

with voip.Ms is that they have automated failover per number. At the same time you would need to address firewall needs for each site versus the cost for a pri gateway(s). Voip.Ms has a how to for sipx on their wiki now. On Monday, September 5, 2011, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mailto:mkitchin.pu

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom

If I went with a separate ITSP, is voip.ms everyone's favorite provider these days? It would be two 50+ handset locations and many 6 to 10 handset locations. On 9/5/2011 6:01 AM, Michael Picher wrote: The data portion of their solution is typically either a Hybrid Fiber/Coax solution (like mos

Re: [sipx-users] sipXecs and VoIP from TW Telecom

Looks like they offer something. http://www.twtelecom.com/Documents/Resources/PDF/cs/LoneStarCaseStudy.pdf http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/voip/time-warner-telecoms-voip-solution.asp

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400 (and 3.3 firmware) - Success!

s not work. On 8/31/2011 6:20 AM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote: It seems great so far. I haven't been able to find anything that doesn't work. *From: * "Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)" *Date: *

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400 (and 3.3 firmware)

he work on 3.3 or higher (I think the 8440 actually runs 4.X) config files for soundpoint phones? ---------------- *From: * "Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)" mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com>> *Date

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400 (and 3.3 firmware)

8440 actually runs 4.X) config files for soundpoint phones? ---------------- *From: * "Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)" mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com>> *Date: *Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:10:32 -0500 *To: *

Re: [sipx-users] Cyberdata VOIP v1 paging amp won't register after upgrade to 4.4.0

What firmware are you running on the pagers? I'm have great luck with these. On 8/11/2011 8:04 AM, Aaron Pursell wrote: > Content-Type: text/plain; >charset="utf-8" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Organization: SipXecs Forum > In-Reply-To:<4dc54ca002d200017...@smtp.esgw.org> > X-FUDfor

Re: [sipx-users] MWI Being Shut Off After Email Sent

Are thereany other issues with 3.2.5? that is what I have been rolling out for a while... On 8/5/2011 11:33 AM, Michael Picher wrote: Why do we need similar info in different places? http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Polycom+Phones Scroll down... 3.2.5 has some issues with phones

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400 (and 3.3 firmware)

s are built on the SPIP stack." On 7/28/2011 1:26 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: Was that 8440 (not 8040)? I am running into issues now with my 8020s that may force me to chunk them. Is the 8440 the line that was supposed to be based on the Soundpoint sip stack? On 7/21/201

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400

I think I'm going to get one in here and try. Maybe I can compare it to some of the config files on a 450/550 to get started. On 8/1/2011 4:42 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: yeah.. but what version of the sip stack are those devices on? 2.2? On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Matth

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400

FYI, from Polycom Me: "is the Spectralink 8440 the model that I heard about that was built on the Soundpoint sip stack, or is it the same as the 8020" Polycom: "Yes, the 8440 and 8450 phones are built on the SPIP stack." On 7/28/2011 1:26 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usen

Re: [sipx-users] Fwd: Re: Polycom Spectralink 8020 - drops at 15 seconds

t to them, and the FW sees no packets coming in (nor dropped). Don *From:*sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org <mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] <mailto:[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org]&g

[sipx-users] Fwd: Re: Polycom Spectralink 8020 - drops at 15 seconds

ink 8020 - drops at 15 seconds Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:46:17 -0500 From: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org 1 way audio was a false alarm. The phone was fine after a rebbot. The dropped call at 15 second issue still exists on external calls. I am using s

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Spectralink 8020 - drops at 15 seconds

pe Laurent <mailto:p...@ideos.com>> wrote: I've had good success with the Unidata WPU-7700, if you can find them anymore. Dunno how well the WPU-7800 meshes with sipx. On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.c

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Spectralink 8020 - drops at 15 seconds

I have to use native wifi in this case. They are single phones at each site. I don't believe Kirk is a good fit. On 7/28/2011 3:07 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: never had fun with those spectralink. use a kirk. On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mailto:mkitchi

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Spectralink 8020 - drops at 15 seconds

rizon is not seeing an ack on the call and thinks rtp is not actually established." is now "sipxecs" is not verizon is not seeing an ack on the call and thinks rtp is not actually established. On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mailto:mkitchin.pub.

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom Spectralink 8020 - drops at 15 seconds

is not sending the ack or the phone is not. got a siptrace? On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com>> wrote: Can anyone help me interpret the attached wireshark? I'm 99.9% positive this has not been occurring all the

Re: [sipx-users] Spectralink 8400

Was that 8440 (not 8040)? I am running into issues now with my 8020s that may force me to chunk them. Is the 8440 the line that was supposed to be based on the Soundpoint sip stack? On 7/21/2011 9:35 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote: I am supposed to be receiving some 8040's for test and evaluation.

Re: [sipx-users] Common SIP user on multiple phones or Hunt Group

Thanks. I was doing an install on the other side of the country (Nashville, TN => Portland, OR) so I missed a few of these replies. My servers are definitely on the low end as far as power. They are Atom processors with 4 GB of RAM. I have not see any other issues that appear to have been relate

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom, sipxecs 4.4 and called id with hunt groups

burned was the 4.0.4. to 4.2.1 upgrade. ACD was destroyed and unfixable even with a paid sipx support ticket. I had to backup, reload sipx, and restore. On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 7/1/2011 7:43 AM

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom, sipxecs 4.4 and called id with hunt groups

On 7/1/2011 7:43 AM, Michael Picher wrote: Well, most PBX's show you WHO is calling, not who they called. Of course if voice goes through a server (big drawback) I suppose if some service is calling you you might see that service. The current ACD should always be setup on a separate line and

Re: [sipx-users] SIPX 4.4 and Unmanaged Gateway

I have no NAT. I just put in the local IP in this field. On 6/29/2011 9:37 AM, Roman Gelfand wrote: What do you enter under servers-->NAT--> public ip ? This can not be blank. On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Tony Graziano mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net>> wrote: when you create a

Re: [sipx-users] LDAP user import

Have you run yum update since the original install? If not, can you? I don't believe the ISOs have been updated with any of the recent bug fixes. I could have sworn there was a bug fix for importing. On 6/8/2011 4:26 PM, Adrian Schmitz wrote: Hi, I was curious whether anyone has ever encountered

Re: [sipx-users] 4.2.1, CPU pegged, would killing process drop calls?

On 6/7/2011 12:38 PM, George Niculae wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:27 PM, George Niculae wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) >> wrote: >>> My sipx server at our corporate office (170+ users) has 1 CPU pegged. It >>>

Re: [sipx-users] 4.2.1, CPU pegged, would killing process drop calls?

On 6/7/2011 12:27 PM, George Niculae wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:11 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) > wrote: >> My sipx server at our corporate office (170+ users) has 1 CPU pegged. It >> is a java process doing this. I haven't received any complaints yet, but &g

[sipx-users] 4.2.1, CPU pegged, would killing process drop calls?

My sipx server at our corporate office (170+ users) has 1 CPU pegged. It is a java process doing this. I haven't received any complaints yet, but I expect them to start before too long. I will reboot it tonight. As far as today, would you expect it to drop active calls if I kill the offending pr

Re: [sipx-users] New eZuce Hire...

+1 On 6/2/2011 2:04 PM, Gabe Casey wrote: Congrats Josh !!! its about time you started getting paid for your help *Gabrial Casey* /Telecommunications/ Franklin American Mortgage Company 501 Corporate Center Dr. Suite 400 Franklin, TN 37067 Direct:615-468-2945 Cell: 615-852-5015 Fax: 615-628-569

Re: [sipx-users] stable repo (4.4.0) memory questions

http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-9236 The backup needs to be decent sized to really expose the issue. On 6/1/2011 7:08 AM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote: > I have a jira on this. I can look it up in a little while. This was the same > on 4.2.1 for me. I have one large system (4.2.1 s

Re: [sipx-users] Need to revert to slightly older version, dying here....

quot;'2F22F6BA-DB9E3055': Received unexpected event InviteRequest while in state 'WaitingForMediaOffer'" "2011-06-01T03:15:01.808994Z":317:HTTP:ERR:pbx.tx255.sipx.voip:AsynchMediaRelayRequestSender-16:41BD9940:SipXProxy:"HttpMessage::get[4] Receiving failed

[sipx-users] Need to revert to slightly older version, dying here....

Not working system sipXecs (4.4.0- 2011-05-20EDT17:17:45 domU-12-31-39-15-3C-B1) Working system sipXecs (4.4.0- 2011-05-10EDT22:57:56 ip-10-110-26-134) I just installed the top system. It worked perfectly in my lab. I'm thinking I may have run an update before I shut it down. Transfers are dead

Re: [sipx-users] Saved Voicemail messages

On 5/29/2011 6:58 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Though I prefer a quota, it becomes harder to manage because "what > happens when the user is at/over quota and someone tries to leave a > voicemail". We currently don;t have an action for "sorry, that box is > full". This is what my users were used to f

Re: [sipx-users] 482 Loop Detected

new wall jacks, patch cables, and everything else in between. We have not had any dropped calls or locked up pages since then. 1.5 days. If we make it through tomorrow too, I will begin to think this may have been the issue. On 5/20/2011 2:01 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: > On 5

Re: [sipx-users] analog/modem support questions

Here is a discussion on it a while back: http://www.mail-archive.com/sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org/msg08163.html On 5/24/2011 8:43 AM, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: All -- We have a small SIPX system using SIP trunks over the Internet for PSTN access. We have a new requirement to be able to s

Re: [sipx-users] analog/modem support questions

Someone is welcome to disagree, but I don't think you will have good luck with this. Faxing can work because there is an actual protocol for it (t38). Trying to send modem data over voice codecs does not work very well. On 5/24/2011 8:43 AM, R. Benjamin Kessler wrote: All -- We have a small

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

I st ill have the log files preserved, but they contain a ton of other data as well. Is there a different token I should use to capture more details? On 5/23/2011 8:23 AM, Michael Picher wrote: Well, if you look at the trace you attached it came from sipxbridge. I can't vouch from the trace

Re: [sipx-users] Unidata Phone plug-in not working in 4.4.0 2011-04-19

Just checking, do you have good luck with these phones? I believe they were discontinued and I tried out the 7800. I had horrible problems with it and couldn't find any decent documentation. There were spelling mistakes on the LCD menus as well. I didn't realize until this post that any support

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

nto VM, call for the > callee is ring no answer. > > Thanks, > Mark W. Wood > office: (760)202-0224 X2010 > > www.redphonetech.com > > > > > > -----Original Message- > From: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) [mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com] >

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

Sure enough. Cuts out at exactly 30 seconds while using the VM menus. sS that what you see? On 5/20/2011 12:36 PM, Mark Wood wrote: > This is the line in my all users file. > > CODECS = g711u, g711a > > Thanks, > Mark W. Wood > office: (760)202-0224 X2010 > > www.redphonetech.com > > > > > >

Re: [sipx-users] 482 Loop Detected (was: Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up)

On 5/20/2011 1:47 PM, Matt White wrote: >>>> "Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)" 05/20/11 2:34 PM>>> > >On 5/20/2011 1:25 PM, Matt White wrote: > >Thank you for the quick response. > >They are running 3.2.5. I don't have t

Re: [sipx-users] Delete voicemail after emailing

On 5/20/2011 1:18 PM, Philippe Laurent wrote: In the GUI, I don't see the ability to automatically delete a voicemail after it has been emailed to the end user... is there an easy work-around, plans for this feature in future releases, or should I input a JIRA for this request? Just a thought,

Re: [sipx-users] 482 Loop Detected (was: Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up)

On 5/20/2011 1:25 PM, Matt White wrote: >>> "Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet)" 05/20/11 2:06 PM >>> >As polite a bump request as possible to convey in an email :) >This is continuing to happen today. Verizon is looking at their end, and not seeing anything so f

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

I don't have an all users file. I specify the codec in the individual user file. As soon as I finish dealing with my other urgent issue, I will play with this and see what I can find. Our cordless phones are for patients, and we disable vociemail. I did not have this problem in my testing tough.

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

        From: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) [mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:28 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

I've got a decent start on an entry for the 8020. http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Configuring+Polycom+Spectralink+8020+WiFi+phones On 5/18/2011 4:31 AM, Michael Picher wrote: One or both of you might want to put some notes in the wiki regarding both of these devices. On Fri, May 13

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

24   X2010 www.redphonetech.com         From: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) [mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 7:45 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXec

Re: [sipx-users] phone registrations expired

Time issues can. Do you have any time synch scripts, routines, cron jobs, etc? On 5/19/2011 12:27 PM, Mark Wood wrote: New installation, 3 Polycom 550’s and 5 8020 wifi’s, all the phone registrations expired overnigh

Re: [sipx-users] Regarding: http://track.sipfoundry.org/browse/XX-8779

Below is what I have to do to use Internal Microsoft Active Directory Certificate authority SSL certs. Once I do this, they work perfectly. I would love to be able to do these normally through the GUI. I'm honestly not sure what all causes it to fail. I don't get very far in the process. I thin

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

sibilities. On 5/19/2011 8:42 AM, Scott Richesson wrote: This may sound crazy, but could this be something as simple as packet loss caused by a bad patch cable or wiring in the wall? I've seen stranger things Scott. *From:*Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) [mailto:mkitchin.pub...@g

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

At this site, the largest hunt group is 8 users. I do have some updates from yesterday. Yesterday morning, I replaced the 550 where most of the calls are answered and I dropped the paging group from 17 users to 15. I dropped it to 14 users late yesterday after they were done for the day. This

Re: [sipx-users] Paging server performance

Old thread, but still relevant to me at least. Does anyone have any updated info on paging limits within 4.4? Does the info below still seem accurate? I'm chasing down some issues and I'm not sure if I've run into this as well. My group had 17 in it, but I've got it down to 14 by removing some p

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

        From: Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) [mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 6:24 AM To: Michael Picher; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

I was hoping at least 1 other person would try out the 8020 and see if they experience the transfer issue that is apparently caused by my itsp. I believe Mark ordered a 8020. If he doesn't have any trouble, I will gladly put a write-up on the wiki. On 5/18/2011 4:31 AM, Michael Picher wrote: O

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

On 5/17/2011 2:42 PM, Gerald Drouillard wrote: >> They ring, but she cannot answer them. She physically answers the phone, >> but the 'answer' option is still there on the handset. >>> "You cannot pick up the call at all" >>> So the buttons on the polycom buttons appear to not be responding? >>> Ph

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

Logging level was set too low :) Just got a chance to restart the services, and will wait for the next failed call. On 5/17/2011 1:17 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: When we were on 4.2.1, we had it limited to g711. With 4.4, we are

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

oundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 9:02 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Need

Re: [sipx-users] Slightly OT: Bricking Audiocodes MP114

Yes. Sorry. I'm merging my issues for the day in my head :) On 5/17/2011 12:56 PM, Melcon Moraes wrote: Did you mean Audiocodes BOOTP tool? - MM On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:23, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) mailto:mkitchin.pub...@gmail.com>> wrote: FYI, after de-bricking i

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

On 5/17/2011 12:13 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: I would do a siptrace and see if the call is being PRACK'd or not. Is this a HA system? I will try next time she gets me some details on a failed call. It is not HA. Plain vanilla setup. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Kitchin (p

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

On 5/17/2011 12:15 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) > wrote: >> Ok. This problem. "About 7-8 times a day when the main line rings, I go >> to answer it and no one is there, but on the LED screen the first butto

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

On 5/17/2011 11:56 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) > wrote: >> Sorry. We switched from auto attendant to user at ext 10 handling most >> calls. That is when the problems began. 7 to 8 calls per day now are unable >> to be answered, a

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

Dang it, I meant 82 (not 90) is a hunt group and 10 was member of that. Sorry. On 5/17/2011 11:02 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: One more additional note. I forgot about this one setting. The initial call here is routed to a phantom

Re: [sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

this. On 5/17/2011 10:39 AM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: This is a fun one. I need some pointers on where to start. I have about 15 sites that are all roughly identical in their setup, so I know the general design is ok. This

[sipx-users] Need some help, dropping calls, paging locking up

This is a fun one. I need some pointers on where to start. I have about 15 sites that are all roughly identical in their setup, so I know the general design is ok. This particular site was Sipx 4.2.1 and Polycom 450/550 firmware 3.2.4 and bootrom 4.3 up until last week. They are now sipx 4.4 (lat

Re: [sipx-users] Slightly OT: Bricking Audiocodes MP114

FYI, after de-bricking it with with the Polycom BOOTP tool, it took the latest 5.8 fine. No more 6.x for me! On 5/16/2011 7:24 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote: Can you run them on 5.8 or 5.6 and not mess with updating them to 6.0? Seems like an issue needs to be opened with Audiocodes. *From:*sipx-use

Re: [sipx-users] 4.4 sipXrls dead

[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) *Sent:* Saturday, May 14, 2011 4:38 PM *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] 4.4 sipXrls dead On 5/14/2011 4:13 PM, Josh M. Patten wrote: Also seeing: "2011-05

Re: [sipx-users] CentOS troubles???

k Engineer > 979.361.4676 > > > -Original Message- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin > (public/usenet) > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 9:03 AM > To: Discussion list for users of sipX

Re: [sipx-users] 4.4 sipXrls dead

On 5/14/2011 4:13 PM, Josh M. Patten wrote: Also seeing: "2011-05-14T21:09:03.135356Z":7:KERNEL:ERR:it.ippbx.co.brazos.tx.us:SipServerBroker-7:42107940:sipxrls:"OsSSLServerSocket SSL_accept SSL handshake error:\n SSL error: 1 'error:0001:lib(0):func(0):reason(1)'" "2011-05-14T21:09:03

Re: [sipx-users] YUM UPDATE Error

ried, I'm afraid... >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org >> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthew >> Kitchin >> (public/usenet) >> Sent: May-13-11 1:54 PM >>

Re: [sipx-users] YUM UPDATE Error

On 5/13/2011 12:50 PM, James Walsh wrote: > Hi all, > > Receiving this error the last couple of days trying to update for the > various fixes that were released: > > sipXecs/primary | 53 kB 00:00 > http://download.sipfoundry.org/pub/sipXecs/4.4.0/CentOS

Re: [sipx-users] Polycom 8002

I worked with Polycom for a couple of months on getting the Spectralink 8020 to work. They had to build some new firmwares to get the 8020 working properly with either sipx 4.2.1 or 4.4. These were problems that didn't exist in 4.0.4. We eventually got everything working

Re: [sipx-users] CentOS troubles???

ught. > > Josh Patten > Brazos County Network Engineer > 979.361.4676 > > > -Original Message- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin > (public/usenet) > Sent: Friday, May 1

[sipx-users] CentOS troubles???

http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2011/05/the-rise-and-fall-of-centos.html This was unfortunately an interesting read for me. CentOS has been our corporate standard for years. I hope they resolve their issues, but the Dag Wieers issue does not seem like a good sign. That repo has always been relia

Re: [sipx-users] Bug fix release update: sipXecs 4.4.0 has been updated

On 5/12/2011 4:01 PM, Matthew Kitchin (public/usenet) wrote: On 5/12/2011 3:52 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote: I know this entails more work, but for sanity sake, would it not make sense to have a log kept that shows all patches that are applied to a given release. From a troubleshooting standpoint

Re: [sipx-users] Bug fix release update: sipXecs 4.4.0 has been updated

On 5/12/2011 3:52 PM, Todd Hodgen wrote: I know this entails more work, but for sanity sake, would it not make sense to have a log kept that shows all patches that are applied to a given release. From a troubleshooting standpoint, it would be nice to be able to open a file that shows what ha

Re: [sipx-users] Bug fix release update: sipXecs 4.4.0 has been updated

On 5/12/2011 3:37 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: > I'm willing to come up with easy instructions for how folks can keep > local copies. > Thanks. > re:ISO > I might change my mind, but ISO are not updated with new RPMs. People > would need to be in the habit of updating after installing if they > want

Re: [sipx-users] Bug fix release update: sipXecs 4.4.0 has been updated

On 5/12/2011 3:20 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote: >> I >> do wonder why they are not archived in another repo (the previous 4.4.0-192 >> packages. It makes the onus on the superadmin to have saved it as its no >> longer available. > Added items #6 to release policy... > http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display

  1   2   3   4   5   >