You are using NTP incorrectly and it is messing up your clock, which is
then messing up registrations. Actually, all kinds of things will be
fowled up by this - it's amazing you have not had other problems.
Ok, I have no issues with being wrong about something but there's only one way
to
No - all sipXecs logs are deliberately recorded only in UTC. That
allows us to correlate events that occur in servers regardless of what
timezone the servers are in.
Ok, so then it's normal for the logs to have that time. Guess I never noticed
that before. Never searched by time I guess,
Fix your clock - make sure that all timestamps in the logs are moving
forward.
This is the task at hand for sure.
your ntp server sync stays stable over at least several hours.
So far, both hardware and OS are perfectly on time.
Until you do this, _NOTHING_ else is worth spending time on.
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:51:14 -0500, Josh Patten wrote:
Does merge-logs need to be run within the /var/log/sipxpbx directory? I
seem to recall that being necessary.
From what I understand, it does, and I do.
___
sipx-users mailing list
by far the most frequent poster), and almost all of yours are completely
lacking anything like sufficient information or clarity that anyone can
I provide what information I can based on the input I get. I provide everything
I'm asked for and don't hold back. As you know, I also have some
No - they just add some date/time formatting code.
I tried installing the required module using; force install
DateTime::Format::ISO8601 and that leads to more problems.
Going to read /root/.cpan/Metadata
Database was generated on Mon, 05 Jul 2010 04:27:04 GMT
DateTime::Format::ISO8601 is up
Yup, Citrix has a 10 guest free starter system.
And vmware has various products which might suit your needs, all free to start.
You can set up a container on your laptop on you could turn a spare machine
into a vmware server and just build your guests (servers) on that.
I think you mentioned
There is a script installed with 4.2 called 'regtimes' that helps to
analyze whether or not you are having the problem described at the wiki
I'd like to try this. I've got many perl modules installed on test systems but
this is a production box.
Just wondering before I go ahead and install the
download and add on.
Mike
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:32 AM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net wrote:
I'm not implying that it can't be done, it sure can be as there are other
integrations on the box.
I didn't know what you were after when I offered some input and as with
anything, depends
-0400, Michael Picher wrote:
I like the Citrix option a little better because you can do a little more
with the underlying OS.
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 12:17 PM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
wrote:
Yup, Citrix has a 10 guest free starter system.
And vmware has various products which
Note how little actual information is in this report of a problem:
sigh This was just a quick post saying the problem had happened again and
that I was looking into it.
I then posted additional information.
___
sipx-users mailing list
Here's my blog entry on it: http://sipxecs.blogspot.com/2010/03/using-
sipviewer-on-your-pc-for-windows.html
Thanks for the URL. I did find that and some other things in the wiki which I
had posted in the other thread I had started which lead me to the problem of
not being able to merge.
When
at 11:50 PM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
wrote:
Ok, I've got a snapshot of before and after the phone dropped.
A call came in at 9:14, lasted 12 minutes, then cut out. The caller said
they could hear us but we could not hear them.
Then we looked at the registered users and that phone
the merged.xml from there too.
Yes, running merge-logs from the current sipx logs directory.
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 10:25 AM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
wrote:
Here's my blog entry on it: http://sipxecs.blogspot.com/2010/03/using-
sipviewer-on-your-pc-for-windows.html
Thanks for the URL
from /var/log/sipxpbx to temp directory and then
run merge-logs
Sounds simple enough, there are some posts/write-ups out there with very
wrong directions.
On 7/3/2010 9:25 AM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
Here's my blog entry on it: http://sipxecs.blogspot.com/2010/03/using-
sipviewer-on-your
empty file you are
getting. I cleaned up all my old logs, copied only the recent logfiles to
a directory and it worked for me.
-Original Message-
From: m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:14:07
To: sipx-userssipx
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 15:19:34 +, Matthew Kitchin (Public) wrote:
Maybe try cleaning some older logs out of the temp dir? Just keep the
I even went as far as stopping sipx, clearing everything out, restarting, then
trying to get the problem.
The empty file problem, my guess is that it's
Think: if that question was never ever ever asked again, how much noise
would it save on the mailing list?
One more problem is definitely old information, such as wiki and other sipx
related historical info.
I can't count how many times I've searched high and low only to find old
information
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:36:23 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
I would never use polycom firmware 3.2.x in production.
Must be working ok for someone else since it was suggested to me on the list.
Everyone has different setups so things that work well for another might not do
so good for someone
only the recent logfiles
to
a directory and it worked for me.
-Original Message-
From: m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 11:14:07
To: sipx-userssipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Reply-To: m...@grounded.net
Subject
...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
m...@grounded.net
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 9:39 AM
To: sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could
realistically be added after 4.2?
Think: if that question was never ever ever
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 13:41:27 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
3.2.x has known issues (Polycom is aware). Any latency on a connection
causes the call the drop... Use it if you wish, I've never considered 3.2.x
stable.
What do you suggest for a good version on these? The device files I have on
sipx
Not to be critical here, but this is a key piece of information that hasn't
been in your emails as you explained this dropped call from last night -
that they were on Vonage and could have dropped on their end.
That's the only vonage related call. Since it was an incoming vonage call,
that's
3.1.3RevC
I can update my server with that.
For boot, I have spip_ssip_BootROM_4_2_2_release_sig.zip
Tony Graziano, Manager
Telephone: 434.984.8430
Fax: 434.984.8431
Email: tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net
LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems
rs-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Matthew Kitchin (Public) Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 8:20 AM To: m...@grounded.net; sipx-users Subject: Re: [sipx-users] All phones expired after conf call Maybe try cleaning some older logs out of the temp
are you running?
-Original Message-
From: m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
Sender: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2010 15:18:33
To: sipx-userssipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Reply-To: m...@grounded.net
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] All phones expired after conf
I know that you know what you mean by it, but what does dropped mean?
Right, I see I used that term twice in similar descriptions.
One 'drop' was a call that came in from someone using vonage. The call ended
abruptly, which we usually call a dropped call. We automatically figured it was
our
First of all, if I didn't cover all of the bases, PLEASE, do not hijack my
thread about it, either start another or email me personally.
For a couple of weeks or more now, we have started noticing a behavior which is
that of phones dropping registration.
Dropping, meaning that they disappear
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 19:38:09 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
Setup a listener for abc.sipxinstall.xyz and have apache serve up a website
when you visit http://abc.sipxinstall.xyz - I have the record in BIND - but
have no idea how to go about setting this up in apache...any pointers would
be
Only thing to keep in mind is that you might need to use a different port
depending on your needs and assuming this is not a problem on sipx. The
iptables filter aren't in play so other than that, I don't know why this would
not work.
http://apptools.com/phptools/virtualhost.php
On Sat, 3
No php installed, it's all java/html based. If you need a bunch of custom
things, might be better to fire up a LAMP server somewhere and leave sipx
alone. It's too easy to break a well working system.
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 23:40:34 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
Another newbie question. Any
I'm not implying that it can't be done, it sure can be as there are other
integrations on the box.
I didn't know what you were after when I offered some input and as with
anything, depends on how much overall resources the end result would consume to
make it worth the effort or not.
I'm sure
wrote:
m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net 07/01/10 6:18 PM
Still doesn't answer how I could have gotten rid of that message but,
so be it I guess.
You can't get rid of a message, the mailing list is nothing but a simple
email. They only way a message is sent to list is if its emailed
On sipx, is there any way of putting people in the same group, yet having it so
that they cannot see each other?
Perhaps an option in one of the control files or something else.
Mike
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:15:21 -0700, Todd Hodgen wrote:
I don't think enough information has been provided to fully understand what
you are looking for, but I suspect you are looking for a feature like
multi-tenant, which is not support in sipXecs.
Right. like multi-tenant. Wondering if there
I'm berating you for complaining that
sipXecs doesn't have good diagnostic facilities at the same time you don't
use the diagnostic facilities it *has* -- which you did in public.
Never complained about it, simply said what I was thinking at the time. Would
be nice to see diagnostic tools
You know, I agree, never said I didn't and said several times, I don't work on
sipx day in and out like most of you here do.
I've been here for some time now, believe in this project and enjoy the
professionalism on this list.
Get's pretty weird when one starts feeling ostracized for making an
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:31:36 -0500, Josh Patten wrote:
For address books simply uncheck the Everyone box under Features
Phonebooks
Yes, that did it. I missed that function looking around for an answer. Thanks.
On 07/02/2010 01:29 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote: On Fri, 02 Jul 2010
10:15
So, if we're back on track, here is the thing.
The first time I came across having to generate those logs, it didn't work.
Trying to merge logs lead me into another issue of not being able to even see
any logs being created. I searched everywhere for information on doing this but
wasn't able
It should be fairly straight forward. Under system logging set it to
debug. It should tell you it needs to restart services. Let it do so.
Right, and I had asked for some input on this, started a thread and was
following along the suggestions but hitting dead ends.
Subject: [sipx-users]
Just now, *while* on a call, the phone dropped registration so it's getting
worse.
Another phone with the same number, registered didn't drop.
It's random and I'm looking at the logs now.
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
After thinking about it, I would like to know if there is a way of removing a
single reply from the list. Not sure why/how it went to the list since I know I
sent it personally, at least it isn't the list as the email address. I don't
mind the list seeing the reply if that is the case but I
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 17:57:52 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
My guess is you are out of luck - there are a bunch of sites that grab a
copy of everything on these lists for future generations...
Not cool, I know I didn't send it public, I still have the outgoing headers of
the original showing
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 18:09:03 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
A pedant is a person who is overly concerned with formalism and
precision.[1]
Gee, and that's how all of this got started with to begin with hehe.
___
sipx-users mailing list
it and my two VVX1500's in.
On 06/27/2010 09:00 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
I pulled two 1535's off ebay for $80. That was about $ 75 too much in
my opinion.
I see some on there now.
Use a softphone/webcam or use the VVX if you want any kind of
dependability/quality. As with most
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:32 PM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
wrote:
I see. I guess to be honest, other than some basic things, we've not had
any problems with sipx in a while so tend to forget the steps when
something does go wrong.
Still, what could have caused this, has anyone
recall reading any posts with anybody else
having the problem.
Mike
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:32 PM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
wrote:
I see. I guess to be honest, other than some basic things, we've not had
any problems with sipx in a while so tend to forget the steps when
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 10:26:01 -0400, Michael Picher wrote:
you just know the standard answer is going to be to go to 4.2.1 right?
Well, no actually. I've seen talk about it, don't see any updates via yum so
wasn't sure if it was stable.
The gui also doesn't see any updated. This system is
My most current versions are 4.2.0 and there seems to be a 4.2.1 update but
neither the GUI or CLI finds any updates.
I do have the edited version of the repo file so unless something changed in
repo, why am I not able to see updates?
Mike
___
section in
sipxconfig then check for updates
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 6/30/2010 1:58 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
I'm beat, no idea how to update short of installing 4.2.1 using ISO and
restoring from a backup.
All I know
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:17:59 -0500, Josh Patten wrote:
Change your repo to look exactly like the following (note the change to
the baseurl in [sipxecs-stable]):
Ok, that's different then the other post and of course works. I've got a system
updating as I type this.
Perhaps I missed a notice
However, sipXecs is an
open-source project, and if you think you could write a useful tool,
you are welcome to contribute it and help everyone.
As for the constant mention of contributing, I can only contribute in terms of
being an end user at the moment, or adding some input into the Wiki,
Do you mean where you say that you didn't take a snapshot because you
forgot about it?
I didn't even think and didn't even remember that. My first thought was to ask
if this was something others had seen first.
That's it, nothing mysterious about it.
If you wish to not spin your wheels, do
in
sipxconfig then check for updates
Josh Patten
Assistant Network Administrator
Brazos County IT Dept.
(979) 361-4676
On 6/30/2010 1:58 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
I'm beat, no idea how to update short of installing 4.2.1 using ISO and
restoring from a backup.
All I know
Does feel like that some days :).
Luckily, people have bad days now and then but for the most part, it's all
good. Hang in there.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:50:12 -0700, Gerald Harper wrote:
thanks for the well thought out answer. I'm beginning to think I should
switch to Asterisk
From:
it and my two VVX1500's in.
On 06/27/2010 09:00 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
I pulled two 1535's off ebay for $80. That was about $ 75 too much in
my opinion.
I see some on there now.
Use a softphone/webcam or use the VVX if you want any kind of
dependability/quality. As with most things
it
goes. once I get it and my two VVX1500's in.
On 06/27/2010 09:00 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
I pulled two 1535's off ebay for $80. That was about $ 75 too much in
my opinion.
I see some on there now.
Use a softphone/webcam or use the VVX if you want any kind of
dependability
Seems to register ok but it doesn't seem to support DNS SRV which would be an
issue.
___
sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe:
Running 4.0.4, just had a 5 way phone conference which went fine, until the
last person hung up. When the last person hung up, all registered phones
suddenly got disconnected. After trying to reboot my own phone several times, I
decided to restart the services from the GUI and after a few
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 18:18:57 -0400, Michael Picher wrote:
when they asked what was needed most, i asked for better troubleshooting
tools as my #1. like having sipviewer somehow integrated would be saweet...
Funny, I wasn't able to remember the name when I posted this but that was my
first
-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
To: m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net sipx-users
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Sent: Tue Jun 29 18:40:01 2010
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] All phones expired after conf call
bump!
Boy, if there's one
:
Yes, well creating a snapshot before restarting services (or right after)
and including the time period helps bunches (but not if you are running
4.0.x as opposed to 4.2.x).
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 10:27 PM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
wrote:
Do you mean just jumping and restarting
Did the list server delete it? There's no attachment.
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:56:39 -0500, Josh Patten wrote:
Once of my coworkers is at a Cisco conference in Vegas this week and he
sent me a picture that I can't keep to myself:
There are not words
AM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
Did the list server delete it? There's no attachment.
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:56:39 -0500, Josh Patten wrote:
Once of my coworkers is at a Cisco conference in Vegas this week and he
sent me a picture that I can't keep to myself:
There are not words
-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
m...@grounded.net
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:15 PM
To: sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] A bit off topic but I had to share
Did the list server delete it? There's no attachment.
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:56:39 -0500, Josh Patten wrote
You might just want to wait for the SIP clients on iphone and Android
to mature. They will eventually do everything you want. I expect to
see lots of innovation in this arena regarding SIP.
Agreed, but again, I'm looking for something I could ship off, pre-configured,
to folks who don't
We played with some granstream gsx3000 I think they were and they seemed to
work ok with sipx but the phones were very terrible quality. I'm looking for a
low cost phone for everyday users, not business users, and came across the
nortel 1535. Anyone try it, recommend it or something else which
I imagine they would love seeing 'little jimmy' even with some pixelation.
Correct, not for business use. When it comes to business, that's one thing but
for non business use, people are willing to put up with not so perfect. Problem
is finding that low cost solution that makes it worthwhile.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:48:47 -0700, Gerald Harper wrote:
I am not happy with the 1535's I have (three of them) running on 4.2 (or any
That's too bad to hear, I was hoping it might be a find.
I have also never thought of the 1535's as a low cost phone, did you find
a deal somewhere?
Seems
I pulled two 1535's off ebay for $80. That was about $ 75 too much in
my opinion.
I see some on there now.
Use a softphone/webcam or use the VVX if you want any kind of
dependability/quality. As with most things in life, you get what you
pay for.
That's a true saying but many people
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 21:58:19 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
You're looking for something that doesn't exist (yet). If it were that easy
everyone would be doing it.
Nah, it always takes someone to find it, then everyone wants it :).
I'm looking!
___
, I believe it's worth
giving it a shot.
I'll soon have more input to add I guess :).
Mike
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
m...@grounded.net
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 9:42 PM
To: sipx
.
�
�sipXecs (thought I'd throw that in there to make this post relevant)...
�
�-Original Message-
�From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
�boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of m...@grounded.net
�Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2010 4:18 PM
�To: sipx-users
�Subject: Re
: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-
boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of m...@grounded.net
[m...@grounded.net]
Searching in /var/log/sipxpbx for both words, in both cases and not finds
nothing. Only one result which is in the freeswitch.xml.fsxml file
, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-
boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of m...@grounded.net
[m...@grounded.net]
Searching in /var/log/sipxpbx for both words, in both cases and not finds
nothing. Only one
After upgrading to 4.2 from 4.0.4 a while back, I've had no problems what so
ever.
A couple of days ago, I noticed there were a number of centos updates and
against my better judgment, felt it better to stay up to date rather than let
it wait so updated the OS.
Since then, intermittent
Just tested again. Had a friend call in on his cell phone and both phones on my
desk didn't ring, but he did get to vm.
I then had someone else call the same number from their cell and this time both
phones rang.
The two phones are a LinkSys SPA941 and a Polycom 330.
I know of people running
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 09:15:55 -0700, Todd Hodgen wrote:
So, why can one person call you, and the other person can't?
I'm not sure how sipXecs would be able to filter something like that unless
filters have been built.
No filters.
Have you opened a wireshark on the two calls to compare the
So, why can one person call you, and the other person can't?
Just as I answered this, the same person called, who didn't ring before and
this time, it rang the LinkSys but not the Polycom.
I'll keep investigating.
___
sipx-users mailing list
This would be a very interesting idea in that one could have multiple sipx
servers pointing to a database instead of just one server.
Right now, the problem with vm is that it is tied to the main server so having
multiple servers for redundancy is a bit of a problem.
Mike
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010
One possibility is that for some reason messages haven't been logged. IIRC,
in version 4.0 you have to restart the affected
components when you change their logging level. Search for the strings
':INCOMING: and :OUTGOING: in the sipXecs
log files. If they are present, merge-logs should be
Noticed this while working in the logs directory.
warning: /var/log/sipxpbx/openfire/openfire: recursive directory loop
Looking in this directory, leads to infinite openfire directories.
Install was a 4.0.4, updated to 4.2 a while back, with seemingly no problems
but I don't use openfire.
If it is a symbolic link to another place where the logs would be then
that could easily explain it.
Yup, it's just that indeed.
lrwxrwxrwx 1 sipxchange root 26 May 11 12:17 openfire -
/var/log/sipxpbx/openfire/
___
sipx-users mailing list
Is the list working again?
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:05:54 -0500, m...@grounded.net wrote:
Finally got back to this problem.
logrotate -f /etc/logrotate.d/sipxchange
open putty to /var/log/sipxpbx
open winscp to /var/log/sipxpbx
create a call that works
create a call that doesn't work
run
Can't say it stopped completely for me, seem to have noticed posts coming in
ok. No way of knowing how many or if any missed.
On Sat, 05 Jun 2010 22:44:48 -0500, Josh Patten wrote:
I've submitted a couple of posts in the last few days that never made it
to the list (they were much smaller
Finally got back to this problem.
logrotate -f /etc/logrotate.d/sipxchange
open putty to /var/log/sipxpbx
open winscp to /var/log/sipxpbx
create a call that works
create a call that doesn't work
run merge-logs on putty
Every time I merge the logs, I get nothing much in the output file.
I would not mind doing it but still waiting for access as I recall.
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 21:51:12 -0400, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-
boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of m...@grounded.net
My question would be, why? Why not just build a separate server and keep things
simple?
On Wed, 19 May 2010 16:00:20 -0500, Tran, Ly V. wrote:
Has anyone here installed the Hylafax fax server in a SipX environment? We
have a project in need of automating the testing of faxing at different
One other thought I can offer is that asterisk can be used as the switch if
you've got your trunk coming into that. Depending on the extension the call is
coming into or whether it's a fax, calls can be routed to sipx, or another pbx
or a fax server.
On Wed, 19 May 2010 16:00:20 -0500, Tran,
faxing. I will give it a try, just need to dig some more
in how to build it. Thanks!
Ly Tran
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony
Graziano
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2010 4:17 PM
To: m
Also looks like it needs to be EmailFormats.properties and NOT
EmailFormats.Properties, note the caps diff.
Mike
On Wed, 12 May 2010 12:33:30 -0500, m...@grounded.net wrote:
So the answer was pretty simple, just needed to know about restarting the
services after adding the file
On Wed, 12 May 2010 14:29:22 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
You need to find an ITSP that DOES support t.38. They are limited, and I
don't actually know of any, but this would be a good time for someone to
pipe up.
We had broadvox for a while which does support T.38 and didn't have a problem
a little time to play with it, so I will see if either of them
have pricing competitive enough to make it worth trying out.
On 5/12/2010 1:51 PM, m...@grounded.net wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2010 14:29:22 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote:
You need to find an ITSP that DOES support t.38. They are limited
leads to nothing found.
On Wed, 12 May 2010 12:33:30 -0500, m...@grounded.net wrote:
So the answer was pretty simple, just needed to know about restarting the
services after adding the file in there. This is not mentioned anywhere of
course. I'll write something up and put it in the wiki as soon
I don't know that anybody has volunteered yet. Thanks for stepping
forward :-) !!
I tried to add a child to System Administration but don't seem to have the
access needed so it's just a comment if someone can fix that up. Also, I need
to include the link to an EmailFormats.properties example
...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
m...@grounded.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 11:51 AM
To: sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Thoughts on to integrate, or not to integrate with
Fax server
On Wed, 12 May 2010 14:29:22 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote
May 2010 19:31:03 -0400, Picher, Michael wrote:
Hey mike,
Did you get access to the Wiki yet?
Mike
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of m...@grounded.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:45 PM
a sample text email of before and after?
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:23 PM, m...@grounded.net m...@grounded.net
wrote:
Yes, like I say, I posted on the wiki but wasn't able to find or don't
have access to creating children of sections. I ended up putting a
comment in only which isn't exactly related
Where is the file?
It is the same file that you attached to this thread and it is text.
or better explain how to find the
file you need since we know where it goes, but not really where to
find it.
Figured I would update my comment once I know where we'll be keeping it.
A couple of
:-) !!
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-
boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of m...@grounded.net
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 12:39 PM
To: sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Custom Notifications
Is there a chance that someone
601 - 700 of 938 matches
Mail list logo
