RE: [SLUG] VmWare configure error

2008-10-26 Thread SMITH GARETH
ds, Gareth Smith IT Operations and Infrastructure 68-72 Waterloo Rd North Ryde, NSW, Australia 2113 Desk:+61 2 8306 6989 Mobile: +61 414 818 575 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daryl Thompson Sent: Monday, 27 October 2008 10:20 AM To: sl

Re: [SLUG] VmWare configure error

2008-10-26 Thread Daryl Thompson
Kevin: Vmware server "VMware-server-1.0.7-108231" Yes i have all kernel headers Daryl: Vmware server 1 or 2? Do you have all the needed kernel headers needed? Kelvin On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:20 +1100, Daryl Thompson wrote: > Hi > > Tried it and I still get the same error > > Regards, > D

Re: [SLUG] VmWare configure error

2008-10-26 Thread David Gillies
Daryl Thompson wrote: Hi Sulgers I am having trouble running "perl /usr/bin/vmware-config.pl" on my Fedora 9 it stops with error make: Leaving directory `/tmp/vmware-config0/vmmon-only' Unable to build the vmmon module. For more information on how to troubleshoot module-related problems, pl

Re: [SLUG] VmWare configure error

2008-10-26 Thread Daryl Thompson
Hi Tried it and I still get the same error Regards, Daryl Thompson Daryl Thompson wrote: > Hi Sulgers > > I am having trouble running "perl /usr/bin/vmware-config.pl" on my > Fedora 9 > > it stops with error > > make: Leaving directory `/tmp/vmware-config0/vmmon-only' > Unable to build the vmm

Re: [SLUG] VmWare configure error

2008-10-25 Thread david
vmware-config.pl tells me that the kernel is compiled with gcc 4.2.3 but I have 4.2.4 installed. So I guess it depends on what your kernel is compiled with. /proc/version tells you what version of gcc was used for your kernel. I can't say I am expert on this topic. Daryl Thompson wrote: Hi da

Re: [SLUG] VmWare configure error

2008-10-25 Thread Daryl Thompson
Hi david My version of gcc is "gcc version 4.3.0 20080428 (Red Hat 4.3.0-8) (GCC) " Regards, Daryl = exactly the same problem I'm having except with Ubuntu To make matters worse, the VMWare site is down for maintenamce ;-( Under Ubuntu

Re: [SLUG] VmWare configure error

2008-10-25 Thread david
exactly the same problem I'm having except with Ubuntu To make matters worse, the VMWare site is down for maintenamce ;-( Under Ubuntu at least, vmware-config.pl is complaining about a mismatch of gcc versions. Do you have a similar problem? what version of gcc are you running? regards, Davi

Re: [SLUG] vmware 1.06 on Hardy won't start

2008-08-24 Thread david
Please ignore... I should have read the fm properly :( The howto below works perfectly. On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 23:55 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > New install of Hardy, and I've followed the steps on this page: > > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=779934 > > The install appears to suc

Re: [SLUG] vmware-server and kernel headers

2007-06-13 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Feisty archive had kernel 2.6.20-15 and 2.6.20-16 > kernel 2.6.20-16 is NOT an automatic upgrade (wonder why?) > vmware-server package had been upgraded to only work on 2.6.20-16 > I still had 2.6.20-15 installed > Other stuff too.. but that was the underlying problem. Make sure you have linux

Re: [SLUG] vmware-server and kernel headers

2007-06-13 Thread david
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 22:40 +1000, Ben Donohue wrote: > Hi David, > > actually my last email meant to say that if you have an old version (of > vmware) uninstall it first... not gcc. My apologies. > I'm not a linux guru and I don't know debian ways. > Can debian do rpm's? > Is there a different i

Re: [SLUG] vmware-server and kernel headers

2007-06-12 Thread Ben Donohue
Hi David, actually my last email meant to say that if you have an old version (of vmware) uninstall it first... not gcc. My apologies. I'm not a linux guru and I don't know debian ways. Can debian do rpm's? Is there a different installation you can use rather than apt-get? Also try to give a sm

Re: [SLUG] vmware-server and kernel headers

2007-06-10 Thread david
On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 15:35 +1000, Ben Donohue wrote: > Hi David, > > make sure gcc is installed. gcc is the latest version according to apt-get [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ ls -l /usr/bin/gcc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 2007-05-26 22:10 /usr/bin/gcc -> gcc-4.1 gcc-4.0 also exists, but isn't symlinked. Sho

Re: [SLUG] vmware-server and kernel headers

2007-06-10 Thread Ben Donohue
Hi David, make sure gcc is installed. if you've got an old version, uninstall it first. I run rpm -i VMware-server-1.0.1-29996.i386.rpm (or whatever version) after you've installed run /usr/bin/vmware-config.pl do you get that far? Ben david wrote: I'm getting some conflicts (?) with the fei

RE: [SLUG] vmware

2007-05-28 Thread Visser, Martin
I don't have a vmware-server box in front of me, but have a look in /var/log/vmware (or /var/log/messages) for any sign of what is going on. You can also run "vmware-cmd ThisBox.vmx start" from a terminal and see if that spits out anything useful. You can also look inside the vmx file if it points

Re: [SLUG] VMware compiles

2007-04-06 Thread justin randell
hi howard, On 4/7/07, Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has anyone been successful in getting VMware to compile under the 2.6.19 or 2.6.20 kernels. I can get it to compile fine under 2.6.18 but not later. i've been able to get vmware server + the any-any patch to compile on amd64 and

Re: [SLUG] VMware-server virtual disk deletion

2006-12-06 Thread jam
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 19:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The virtual hard disks are created as files. You should be able to > > delete the files from windows explorer. search for *.vmdk and delete > > all the junk in that directory. > > Thanks for replying, Ershad. > > Windows Explorer isn

Re: [SLUG] VMware-server virtual disk deletion

2006-12-06 Thread jam
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 19:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > never had this happen before. > > usually you have to remove the VM from the list of servers in the > > "inventory" first. > > then blow away the files. > > possibly something is still holding them open. > > you could always reboot t

Re: [SLUG] VMware-server virtual disk deletion

2006-12-06 Thread donohueb
vmware for Linux seems to work well for me anyhow... don't know what probs you were having though... ben Leslie Katz wrote: When I "deleted" the VMware-server virtual hard disks, they were actually moved to either root's or my .Trash directory, as appropriate. Until they were deleted from whic

Re: [SLUG] VMware-server virtual disk deletion

2006-12-06 Thread Leslie Katz
When I "deleted" the VMware-server virtual hard disks, they were actually moved to either root's or my .Trash directory, as appropriate. Until they were deleted from whichever of those two directories they were in, they continued to take up the same space as before their "deletion". Now that I'

Re: [SLUG] VMware-server virtual disk deletion

2006-12-06 Thread Leslie Katz
Ershad Shafi Chowdhury wrote: The virtual hard disks are created as files. You should be able to delete the files from windows explorer. search for *.vmdk and delete all the junk in that directory. Thanks for replying, Ershad. Windows Explorer isn't available for the purpose. I was using a Lin

Re: [SLUG] VMware-server virtual disk deletion

2006-12-05 Thread donohueb
never had this happen before. usually you have to remove the VM from the list of servers in the "inventory" first. then blow away the files. possibly something is still holding them open. you could always reboot the host server and then try deleting the files. Ben Leslie Katz wrote: I installe

Re: [SLUG] VMware-server virtual disk deletion

2006-12-05 Thread Leslie Katz
donohueb wrote: never had this happen before. usually you have to remove the VM from the list of servers in the "inventory" first. then blow away the files. possibly something is still holding them open. you could always reboot the host server and then try deleting the files. Ben Thanks for r

Re: [SLUG] VMware-server virtual disk deletion

2006-12-05 Thread Ershad Shafi Chowdhury
The virtual hard disks are created as files. You should be able to delete the files from windows explorer. search for *.vmdk and delete all the junk in that directory. -iru P.S. Why are you creating new virtual machines? plenty to download and test :) Leslie Katz wrote: I installed the VMwa

Re: [SLUG] VMware question

2006-10-26 Thread David Gillies
Howard Lowndes wrote: I'm trying to install VMware workstation on a lappy with 2 interfaces, eth0 and ra0. It appears, as far as I can make out, that the vmware-config.pl script only identifies interfaces of type "eth?" and knows nothing about any other interface type, and hence does not pres

Re: [SLUG] VMware question

2006-10-26 Thread Billy Govan
Hello Howard, Here's my ideas and suggestions: For the ra0 issue, if you don't get any assistance from this list, then I suggest you have a look in here: http://www.vmware.com/community/index.jspa I believe ra0 is your wireless card but that's all that I know myself. For VMware Player, by desi

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-17 Thread Dean Hamstead
in regards to option (2), you cant have vmware preallocate space or to allocate on the fly. this means that free space is free on the host as well as the guest. im not sure if you can convert between, but i can see the advantages when cloning if you were to start without preallocation then after

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-16 Thread Carlo Sogono
Just FYI. I'm replying to my own post after doing some tests of my own. I have tested VMWare Server 1.0 as a host on both RHEL4 AS and Ubuntu Dapper Server. VMWare Server can essentially be used as a workstation but with one lacking feature: cloning. It is possible to still clone a guest OS in

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread Dean Hamstead
alas corporate policy prevents many of use from this =( but at home... bwoohahahaha ok this is getting more slug-chat. ill end now by saying if you want to mess with OS's then vmware workstation is your software, if you want to run some servers then vmware server. we don't run anything producti

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I was under the impression that you couldnt just grab a virtual host > file and move it from one to the other. Well, at least with the new VMWare Importer, you can escape the Microsoft black hole. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread Dean Hamstead
I was under the impression that you couldnt just grab a virtual host file and move it from one to the other. Im sure you can get norton ghost or something and do some great hacks to pull it out and put it into the other. however, both have different virtual hardware, and vmware is the only one w

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread Jeff Waugh
> and no, you cant migrate from one to the other. Do you mean VMotion style guest migration, or migration from Virtual PC to VMWare? ... "Opens VMware or Microsoft virtual machine format and Symantec LiveState Recovery images with VM Importer." Yoink! http://www.vmware.com/products/server/

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread Dean Hamstead
there is nothing stopping you from running server machines on vmware workstations, its just that you will have to leave the server logged in and to get at the 'physical' console of the virtual machines you will need to get onto the desktop of the host machine as jeff points out, vmware server run

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread Michael Fox
On 7/14/06, Carlo Sogono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I see. Thanks for the clarification. Sorry for the noob questions, but how is this exactly different from, say a VMWare Workstation machine that I can connect to using VNC/SSH or RDP? I'll probably give it a go on the weekend... VMware worksta

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I see. Thanks for the clarification. Sorry for the noob questions, but how > is this exactly different from, say a VMWare Workstation machine that I > can connect to using VNC/SSH or RDP? I'll probably give it a go on the > weekend... You'd have to connect to the host machine running VMWare Wo

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread Carlo Sogono
Jeff Waugh wrote: VMWare Server is not for running server operating systems, it's for running *as a server* itself. Want to run 15 operating systems concurrently on a very beefy, headless server in your data centre? Want to be able to connect to them and manage them remotely, with a full graphica

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I noticed that VMWare Server 1.0 was released recently and is freely > downloadable. How is this significantly different from the other VMWare > versions? A quick skim through the site gives me nothing more than "VMWare > Server is more suitable for servers" and "VMWare Workstation is suitable

Re: [SLUG] VMWare Server free as in free beer

2006-07-13 Thread James Purser
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 09:13 +1000, Carlo Sogono wrote: > I noticed that VMWare Server 1.0 was released recently and is freely > downloadable. How is this significantly different from the other VMWare > versions? A quick skim through the site gives me nothing more than > "VMWare Server is more su

Re: [SLUG] VMware server Release Canidate 1 Announced

2006-06-01 Thread charles
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 15:55 +1000, purana wrote: > Just thought I'd pass on some information I got in my email inbox earlier... > > It appears VMware Server Release Canidate 1 just got announced and is > available for download. It has a number of changes and improvements. > > Just in case anyone

Re: [SLUG] vmware/fc5

2006-05-01 Thread Peter Rundle
Andrew Tappert wrote: [snip] http://knihovny.cvut.cz/ftp/pub/vmware/vmware-any-any-update101.tar.gz Running that (the runme.pl in that archive) fixed it for me... Thanks, I've gone back to FC4 because I was also having problems with Cross-over office. It gives errors in X and won't launch

Re: [SLUG] VMware on Linux question

2006-04-18 Thread Ben Donohue
Hi Peter, I'm using Centos 4.2 and VMware Beta and had a few initial weird problems including what you are having. things like rebooting, copying files via samba would stop mid way and the volume would be unmounted, would not let me remount it without a reboot of the host operating system etc.

Re: [SLUG] VMware on Linux question

2006-04-17 Thread Michael Fox
On 4/18/06, Peter Rundle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sluggers, > > Just wondering if anyone has seen this behaviour. As per the Title, > installed VMWare on Linux (FC4). Software starts Ok and gets to the VMware Workstation 5 or VMware Server beta 2? > point where I can power on the virtual mach

Re: [SLUG] VMware on Linux question

2006-04-17 Thread Peter Rundle
I had a problem on my HP nc6230 panicing with similar symptoms. The fix (for me) was to disable bridging in VMware's network configuration. thanks for the tip but that wasn't it. :-( I disabled networking altogether but it still crashes the host on guest startup. The search continues

Re: [SLUG] VMware on Linux question

2006-04-17 Thread James Gray
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:38 am, Peter Rundle wrote: > Sluggers, > > Just wondering if anyone has seen this behaviour. As per the Title, > installed VMWare on Linux (FC4). Software starts Ok and gets to the > point where I can power on the virtual machine. At this point the host > machine is rebooted.

Re: [SLUG] VMware 5 Workstation + Linux = kernel panic?

2005-11-10 Thread Matt Moor
There are 'issues' with VMWare 5's bridge module and the kernel that ships with Breezy. Apparently, the latest any-any patch will fix it. See here for details: http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-77040.html You could also try building your images elsewhere, and runnning them up in VMW

Re: [SLUG]VMware 5 Workstation + Linux = kernel panic?

2005-11-10 Thread Steve Kowalik
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:21:33 +1100, Peter Rundle uttered > Did anyone get any joy on this? > > I've tried to run VMware 5.0.0-13124 but as others have found out the > network modules panic the kernel. Tried the old VMware 2.0.4 but again > same issue. (I'm running kernel 2.6.11-smp) Don't feel l

Re: [SLUG] VMware 5 Workstation + Linux = kernel panic?

2005-11-10 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Your Kubuntu 2.6.12-9-686. is not supported. When you look on this page you > will see the latest 2.6 kernal supported is 2.6.9. You can probably get > everything working by downgrading to this kernel. You can just use the install scripts that come with VMware to build the kernel modules. Work

Re: [SLUG]VMware 5 Workstation + Linux = kernel panic?

2005-11-10 Thread Peter Rundle
Host networks are fine. Haven't tried NAT'ed networks but we'll see about that when I'm online again. Did anyone get any joy on this? I've tried to run VMware 5.0.0-13124 but as others have found out the network modules panic the kernel. Tried the old VMware 2.0.4 but again same issue. (I'm

Re: [SLUG] VMware 5 Workstation + Linux = kernel panic?

2005-11-10 Thread Broun, Bevan
Hi James You didnt say which version of vmware you are using, Im guessing 5.0. See: http://www.vmware.com/support/ws5/doc/intro_hostreq_ws.html Your Kubuntu 2.6.12-9-686. is not supported. When you look on this page you will see the latest 2.6 kernal supported is 2.6.9. You can probably get ever

Re: [SLUG] VMware 5 Workstation + Linux = kernel panic?

2005-11-10 Thread Michael Fox
On 11/10/05, James Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > Anyone else seen this before and if so, did you fix it? Google and VMware's > website turns up nadda. Haven't experienced the problem you describe personally. Sounds like one of the kernel modules is not quite right. Also, Vmware W

Re: [SLUG] vmware problem...Hacked!

2004-08-09 Thread Peter Rundle
Answering my own question, in case other's are in the same boat. I've solved the problem by commenting out the error checking from vmware-config.pl at line 925 in my version. Starting at the following lines; # We found a valid page offset # if (not (lc($header_page_offset) eq lc($gSystem{'pag

Re: [SLUG] VMware on Redhat 8.0

2003-03-04 Thread Mike MacCana
Most of the criticism leveled at GCC 2.96 is provably false, asides from the fact that Red Hat forked it for a short time (with good reason to). http://www.redhat.com/advice/speaks_gcc.html Mike On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 11:06, Broun, Bevan wrote: > Im running RH-8 and vmware 3.2 right now. I didnt

Re: [SLUG] VMware on Redhat 8.0

2003-03-04 Thread Broun, Bevan
Im running RH-8 and vmware 3.2 right now. I didnt seem to have much trouble getting it going. If anyone needs help getting it going email me - I think the only issue is the verion of gcc that is supplied (rh-8 moved from the infamous 2.96 to 3.2) BB on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:58:45AM +1100, Bruce

Re: [SLUG] VMware on Redhat 8.0

2003-03-04 Thread Bruce Badger
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 10:39, Howard Lowndes wrote: > If anyone is running VMware 3.2 on Redhat 8.0 without getting a closing > error message, could they contact me OL pse. I'm not sure what "OL pse" means (sorry), so I'll post here. The current version of VMWare is not supported in RH8, though th

Re: [SLUG] VMware & network address

2002-05-16 Thread Graeme Robinson
On Fri, 17 May 2002, Andrew Eager wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just got vmware running on my machine. Its using a pre-installed > Win98 on a separate partition. The machine was previously a dual boot > with both OS's using the same IP address. > > My question is: > > How do I have the virtual

Re: [SLUG] VMware & network address

2002-05-16 Thread John Clarke
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 02:27:04AM +1000, Andrew Eager wrote: > How do I have the virtual Win98 session and Linux use the same IP address? You can't. Give each OS a different IP address. Cheers, John -- whois [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key id: 0xD59C360F http://kirriwa.net/john/ -- SLUG - Sydne

Re: [SLUG] VMWare and RH7.0

2001-04-26 Thread John Clarke
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:45:29PM +1000, Scott Ragen wrote: > Do you have DGA enabled? Yes: [johnc@dropbear ~]$ xdpyinfo name of display::0.0 version number:11.0 vendor string:The XFree86 Project, Inc vendor release number:4001 [snip] number of extensions:28 [snip] XFre

RE: [SLUG] VMWare and RH7.0

2001-04-26 Thread Scott Ragen
Do you have DGA enabled? its a setting in XF86Config(-4), and the rpm for it, XFree86-DGA Try that out and see how you go. Regards, Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Clarke Sent: Thursday, 26 April 2001 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [SLUG] VMWare and RH7.0

2001-04-25 Thread John Gunning
John, I'm running RH 7.0 in VMWare without a hitch. Do you have the latest version (I think it's rev. 299) and have you loaded up the VMWare X driver? Note that mine was a clean install of RH 7.0 in a new VM. HTH - Original Message - From: "John Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL P

Re: [SLUG] VMWare and LILO configuration

2001-01-23 Thread Crossfire
- Original Message - From: "Jeff Waugh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sydney Linux Users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 1:29 PM Subject: Re: [SLUG] VMWare and LILO configuration > > What's the one RedHat 7.0 uses? > > C

RE: [SLUG] VMWare and LILO configuration

2001-01-23 Thread Jill Rowling
Sorry - Just couldn't resist the misquote: ...not Our Raster, whose art is EVAS! - JR -- Jill Rowling, Snr Des. Eng. & Unix System Administrator Elec. Eng. Dept, Aristocrat Technologies Australia 3rd Floor, 77 Dunning Ave Rosebery NSW 2018 Phone: (02) 9697-4484 Fax: (02) 9663-1412 Email: [EMAIL

Re: [SLUG] VMWare and LILO configuration

2001-01-23 Thread Jeff Waugh
> However I think it is way cool and possibly should be on source forge, > converted to GNU asm and have support for lilo.conf files. The author calls > himself Raster, but he's not the Rasterman. Does anyone know him? He's just "some random dude that speaks Spanish", not Our Raster. ;) I fo

Re: [SLUG] VMWare and LILO configuration

2001-01-23 Thread John Ryland
On Sunday 07 January 2001 22:54, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > Then, install GAG to your MBR for normal OS switching - it's tiny, > graphical, and perky. It's also Free Software. You can find GAG on > Freshmeat. Sorry this is old, slowly catching up on my email since l.c.a Anyway, I just had a look at

Re: [SLUG] VMWare and LILO configuration

2001-01-07 Thread Subba Rao
On 0, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > In the current LILO configuration, I have: > > boot=/dev/hda > > > > Can anyone recommend a better LILO and/or VMWare configuration? > > But of course! :) > > > I prefer that VMWare not to prompt me for the guest OS. I plan to install

Re: [SLUG] VMWare and LILO configuration

2001-01-07 Thread Jeff Waugh
> In the current LILO configuration, I have: > boot=/dev/hda > > Can anyone recommend a better LILO and/or VMWare configuration? But of course! :) > I prefer that VMWare not to prompt me for the guest OS. I plan to install > other Guest OSs on other HD (/dev/hdb). How will the "boot" d

Re: [SLUG] VMWare help

2000-10-01 Thread Herbert Xu
David Grubb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tried this and when I entered the mount command, it returned with "mount: the > kernel does not recognize /dev/fd0 as a block device (maybe 'insmod driver'?) " -o loop -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI

Re: [SLUG] VMWare help

2000-09-30 Thread David Grubb
Thanks Pete, Tried this and when I entered the mount command, it returned with "mount: the kernel does not recognize /dev/fd0 as a block device (maybe 'insmod driver'?) " Normally I would just nod and smile at responses like this, but in this case it still doesn't get me anywhere ;) Can someone

Re: [SLUG] VMWare help

2000-09-30 Thread Peter Rundle
David, > Due to FDC problems, my system no longer has a floppy drive, and I'm trying out > VMware 2.0.2 (with Corel Linux) - the problem being I cannot install the vmware > tools without a floppy drive (and the vmware website offers no further advice > on this). You don't need a floppy drive to