Hi,
My username is KumarLImbu and I would like to be added to the Contributors
Group.
Could somebody please help me?
Best Regards,
Kumar
CloudSolrServer uses LBHttpSolrServer by default. CloudSolrServer connects
to Zookeeper and passes the live nodes
to LBHttpSolrServer. LBHttpSolrServer connects each node as round robin. By
the way do you mean leader instead of master?
2013/7/12 sathish_ix skandhasw...@inautix.co.in
Hi ,
Iam
If you want to plan to have 2 shards and if you start up the first node it
will be the leader of first shard. When you start up second node it will be
the leader of second shard. If you start up third node it will be the
replica of first shard. If you start up fourth node it will be the replica
of
If you have one collection you just need to define hostnames of Zookeeper
ensembles and run that command once.
2013/7/11 Zhang, Lisheng lisheng.zh...@broadvision.com
Hi,
We are testing solr 4.3.0 in Tomcat (considering upgrading solr 3.6.1 to
4.3.0), in WIKI page
for solrCloud in Tomcat:
Hi Mikhail,
I have used wrong the term block join. When I said block join I was referring
to a join performed on a single core versus cross join which was performed on
multiple cores.
But I saw your benchmark (from cache) and it seems that block join has better
performance. Is this
Hi,
we are using Solr 4.3 with regular sharding without ZooKeeper.
I see the following errors inside our logs:
14995742 [qtp427093680-2249] INFO org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore - [DE1]
webapp=/solr path=/select
Hi Solr people!
We need to suggest part numbers in alphabetically order adding up to four
characters to the already entered part number prefix. That works quite well
with terms component acting on a multivalued field with keyword tokenizer and
edge nGram filter. I am mentioning part numbers to
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:19 PM, mihaela olteanu mihaela...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hi Mikhail,
I have used wrong the term block join. When I said block join I was
referring to a join performed on a single core versus cross join which was
performed on multiple cores.
But I saw your benchmark (from
Hi,
Scenario:
User who perform search forget to put punctuation mark (apostrophe) for ex,
when user wants to search for a value like INT'L, they just key in INTL
(with no punctuation). In this scenario, I wish to return both values with
INTL and INT'L that currently are indexed on SOLR
Do you want to modify Solr source code? Did you check that line at
XMLWriter.java :
*writeAttr(numFound,Long.toString(numFound));*
2013/7/12 Matt Lieber mlie...@impetus.com
Hello there,
I would like to be able to know whether I got over a certain threshold of
doc results.
I.e. Test
Hi,
tickTime in zookeeper was high. When i reduced it to 2000ms solr node status
gets updated in 20s. Hence resolved my issue. Thanks for helping me.
I have one more question.
1. Is it advisable to reduce the tickTime further.
2. Or whats the most appropriate tickTime which gives maximum
Hi,
I have defined my new Solr RequestHandler plugin like this in SolrConfig.xml
requestHandler name=/myendpoint class=com.abc.MyRequestPlugin
/requestHandler
And its working fine.
Now I want to do some custom processing from my this plugin by making a
search query to regular '/select'
Hi!
To repeat the problem, do the following
1. Start a node1 of SolrCloud (4.3.1 default configs) (java
-Dbootstrap_confdir=./solr/collection1/conf -Dcollection.configName=myconf
-DzkRun -jar start.jar)
2. Import to collection1 - shard1 some data
3. Try group.query e.g.
Hello folks,
I'm doing a search for a specific word (Rocket Banana) in a specific field
and the document with the result Rocket Banana (Single) never comes
first..and this is the result that should appear in first position...i've
tried to many ways to perform this search:
title:Rocket Banana
_Why_ should Rocket Banana (Single) come first?
Essentially you have some ordering in mind and
unless you can express it clearly you'll _never_ get
ideal ranking. Really.
But your particular issue can probably be solved by adding
a clause like OR rocket banana^5
And I suspect you haven't given
Hello,
As per earlier email thread, I have created a patch for Solr website to
incorporate links to my new book.
It would be nice if somebody with commit rights for the (markdown) website
could look at it before the book's Solr version (4.3.1) stops being the
latest :-)
I promise to help with
I've crawled some webpages and indexed them at Solr. I've queried data at
Solr via Solrj. url is my unique field and I've define my query as like
that:
ModifiableSolrParams params = new ModifiableSolrParams();
params.set(q, lang:tr);
params.set(fl, url);
params.set(sort, url desc);
I've run my
bq: Note:Term Component works only on string dataType field. :(
Not true. Term Component will work on any indexed field. It'll bring
back the _tokens_ that have been indexed though, which are often
individual words so your examples medical physics would be two
separate tokens so it may be
Inline
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Manuel Le Normand
manuel.lenorm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As a result of frequent java OOM exceptions, I try to investigate more into
the solr jvm memory heap usage.
Please correct me if I am mistaking, this is my understanding of usages for
the heap
Thanks very much for your clear explanation!
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 1:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: What happens in indexing request in solr cloud if
Zookeepers are all dead?
Sorry, no
the first thing I'd try would be FunctionQueries, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FunctionQuery.
Be a little careful. You have disjoint conditions, i.e.
one or the other should be used so you'll have two
function queries, basically expressing
if (age 20 years)
if (age = 20 years)
The one that
Sorry I might not have asked clearly, our issue is that we have
a few thousand collections (can be much more), so running that
command is rather tedius, is there a simpler way (all collections
share same schema/config)?
Thanks very much for helps, Lisheng
-Original Message-
From:
Done, at least to the Solr contributor's group, if you want
Lucene, let me know.
Added exactly as KumarLImbu, don't know whether
1 both the L and I should be capitalized
2 whether the rights-checking cares.
Thanks!
Erick
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Kumar Limbu kumarli...@gmail.com wrote:
This is probably not all that important to worry about. The additional
duties of a leader are pretty minimal. And the leaders will shift around
anyway as you restart servers etc. Really feels like a premature
optimization.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:53 PM, aabreur
On 7/11/2013 11:11 PM, Ranjith Venkatesan wrote:
tickTime in zookeeper was high. When i reduced it to 2000ms solr node status
gets updated in 20s. Hence resolved my issue. Thanks for helping me.
I have one more question.
1. Is it advisable to reduce the tickTime further.
2. Or whats the
On 7/12/2013 7:29 AM, Zhang, Lisheng wrote:
Sorry I might not have asked clearly, our issue is that we have
a few thousand collections (can be much more), so running that
command is rather tedius, is there a simpler way (all collections
share same schema/config)?
When you create each
Hmmm. One way is:
http://localhost:8983/solr/core/select/?q=*%3A*facet=truefacet.field=idfacet.offset=10rows=0facet.limit=1http://hgsolr2devmstr:8983/solr/providersearch/select/?q=*%3A*facet=truefacet.field=cityfacet.offset=10rows=0facet.limit=1
If you have a result you have results 10.
Test where? I mean, numFound is right there at the top of the query
results, right?
Unfortunately there is no function query value source equivalent to
numFound. There is numdocs, but that is the total documents in the
index. There is also docfreq(term), which could be used in a function
Thanks.
Yeah I don't really want the queryNorm on
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Collins danwcoll...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't know the full answer to your question, but here's what I can offer.
Solr offers 2 types of normalisation, FieldNorm and QueryNorm. FieldNorm
is as the
Hi,
As per the suggestions above I shifted my focus to using CloudSolrServer. In
terms of sending updates to the leaders and reducing network traffic it
works great. But i faced one problem in using CloudSolrServer is that it
opens too many connections as large as five thousand connections. My
Thanks Shawn,
Do you have any feeling for what gets traded off if we increase the
maxMergeCount?
This is completely new for us because we are experimenting with indexing
pages instead of whole documents. Since our average document is about 370
pages, this means that we have increased the number
My problem is I have n fields (say around 10) in Solr that are searchable,
they all are indexed and stored. I would like to run a query first on my
whole index of say 5000 docs which will hit around an average of 500 docs.
Next I would like to query using a different set of keywords on these 500
sum(x, y, z) = x + y + z (sums those specific fields values for the current
document)
sum(x, y) = x + y (sum of those two specific field values for the current
document)
sum(x) = field(x) = x (the specific field value for the current document)
The sum function in function queries is not an
On 7/12/2013 9:23 AM, Tom Burton-West wrote:
Do you have any feeling for what gets traded off if we increase the
maxMergeCount?
This is completely new for us because we are experimenting with indexing
pages instead of whole documents. Since our average document is about 370
pages, this
Thanks very much for all the helps!
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:s...@elyograg.org]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 7:31 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr 4.3.0 cloud in Tomcat, link many collections to
Zookeeper
On 7/12/2013 7:29 AM, Zhang, Lisheng
Hi Alexandre,
I'll work on this today.
Steve
On Jul 12, 2013, at 8:26 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
As per earlier email thread, I have created a patch for Solr website to
incorporate links to my new book.
It would be nice if somebody with commit rights for
Hi Mikhail,
I have commented on your blog, but it seems I have done st wrong, as the
comment is not there. Would it be possible to share the test setup (script)?
I have found out that the crucial thing with joins is the number of 'joins'
[hits returned] and it seems that the experiments I have
Hi,
Ok I will not use Bold text in my queries
I guess my question is not clear to you
See what I am doing is, i have a live source say 'A' and a stored database
say it as 'B'.ok
A and B ,both have title fields in them.Consider A as non-persistent solr
and B as persistent solr.
I have
OK Thanks Shawn,
I went with this because 10 wasn't working for us and it looks like my index
is staying under 20 GB now with numDocs : 16897524 and maxDoc : 19048053
mergePolicy class=org.apache.lucene.index.TieredMergePolicy
int name=maxMergeAtOnce5/int
int
Thanks William, I'll do that.
Matt
On 7/12/13 7:38 AM, William Bell billnb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm. One way is:
http://localhost:8983/solr/core/select/?q=*%3A*facet=truefacet.field=id;
facet.offset=10rows=0facet.limit=1http://hgsolr2devmstr:8983/solr/provi
hi I wanted to understand if it is possible to store/save Solr indexes to the
database instead of the filesystem. I checked out some articles where lucene
can do it. Hence I assume Solr can too but its not clear to me how to
configure Solr to save the indexes in the database instead in the /index
Hello Roman,
Thanks for your interest. I briefly looked on your approach, and I'm really
interested in your numbers.
Here is the trivial code, I'd rather prefer rely on your testing framework,
and can provide you a version of Solr 4.2 with SOLR-3076 applied. Do you
need it?
And why would you want to do that? Seems rather wrong direction to march in.
I am assuming relational database. There is a commercial solution that
integrates Solr into Cassandra, if I understood it correctly:
http://www.datastax.com/what-we-offer/products-services/datastax-enterprise/apache-solr
On 7/12/2013 12:30 PM, sagarmj76 wrote:
hi I wanted to understand if it is possible to store/save Solr indexes to the
database instead of the filesystem. I checked out some articles where lucene
can do it. Hence I assume Solr can too but its not clear to me how to
configure Solr to save the
The reason for going that route is because our application is clustered and
if the indexing information is on the filesystem, I am not sure whether that
would be replicated. At the same time since its a product it needs to be
packaged with the product and also from a proprietary reason we are not
On 13 July 2013 00:19, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 7/12/2013 12:30 PM, sagarmj76 wrote:
hi I wanted to understand if it is possible to store/save Solr indexes to
the
database instead of the filesystem. I checked out some articles where
lucene
can do it. Hence I assume Solr can
On 7/12/2013 12:51 PM, Sagar Jadhav wrote:
The reason for going that route is because our application is clustered and
if the indexing information is on the filesystem, I am not sure whether that
would be replicated. At the same time since its a product it needs to be
packaged with the product
I think that makes a lot of sense as I was reading the Solr Cloud technique.
Thanks a lot Shawn for the validation.
Thanks a lot everyone for helping me out to go in the right direction. I
really appreciate all the inputs. I will now go back and get the exception
for getting access to the
If they ask, tell them that Solr *is* a database. Databases store their
stuff on a file system, so your data is gonna end up there in the end.
Putting Solr indexes inside a database is like storing mysql tables in
Oracle.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013, at 08:18 PM, Sagar Jadhav wrote:
I think
Is the vocabulary known? That is, do you know the abbreviations that
will be used? If so, you could consider synonyms, in which case you'd
go to tokenized titles and use phrase queries to get your matches...
Regexes often don't scale extremely well, although the 4.x FST
implementations are much
i am using solr 3.5, tika-app-1.4 and tagcloud 1.2.1. when i try to =
import a
file via xml i get this error, it doesn't matter what file format i try =
to index txt, cfm, pdf all the same error:
SEVERE: Exception while processing: rec document :
SolrInputDocument[{id=3Did(1.0)=3D{myTest.txt},
Hi. Could you add me (KenGeis) to the Solr Wiki ContributorsGroup? I'd
like to fix some typos.
Thanks,
Ken Geis
Done, Thanks for helping!
Erick
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Ken Geis kg...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Hi. Could you add me (KenGeis) to the Solr Wiki ContributorsGroup? I'd like
to fix some typos.
Thanks,
Ken Geis
Hello,
Can you please add me to the ContributorsGroup? I would like to add
instructions for setting up SolrCloud using Jboss.
thanks.
username: saqib
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Ali, Saqib docbook@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can you please add me to the ContributorsGroup? I would like to add
instructions for setting up SolrCloud using Jboss.
thanks.
Norms stay in the index even if you delete all of the data. If you just
changed the schema, emptied the index, and tested again, you've still
got norms in there.
You can examine the index with Luke to verify this.
On 07/09/2013 08:57 PM, William Bell wrote:
I have a field that has
I am getting a java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Requested array size exceeds VM
limit on certain queries.
Please advise:
19:25:02,632 INFO [org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore]
(http-oktst1509.company.tld/12.5.105.96:8180-9) [collection1] webapp=/solr
path=/select
when I search a keyword (such as apple), most of the docs carry 0.0 as
score. Here is an example from explain:
str name=
http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2013-07-12/world-at-work-india.html;
0.0 = (MATCH) fieldWeight(content:appl in 51), product of:
1.0 = tf(termFreq(content:appl)=1)
Did you put a boost of 0.0 on the documents, as opposed to the default of
1.0?
x * 0.0 = 0.0
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Joe Zhang
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 10:31 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: zero-valued retrieval scores
when I search a keyword (such
Yes, you are right, the boost on these documents are 0. I didn't provide
them, though.
I suppose the boost scores come from Nutch (yes, my solr indexes crawled
web docs). What could be wrong?
again, what exactly is the formula for fieldNorm?
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Jack Krupansky
For the calculation of norm, see note number 6:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/similarities/TFIDFSimilarity.html
You would need to talk to the Nutch guys to see why THEY are setting
document boost to 0.0.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From:
Thanks, Jack!
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote:
For the calculation of norm, see note number 6:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/**4_3_0/core/org/apache/lucene/**
62 matches
Mail list logo
