On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 21:14 +0100, lei wrote:
You present a very interesting observation. I have not noticed what you
describe, but on the other hand we have not done comparative speed
tests.
> q=*:*&fq=country:"US"&fq=category:112
First observation: Your query is '*:*, which is a "magic" query.
do you publish you solr in tomcat?which is the tomcat port?
2014-12-16 15:45 GMT+08:00 Xin Cai :
> hi Everyone
> I am a complete noob when it comes to Solr and when I try to follow the
> tutorial and run Solr I get the error message
>
> "Waiting to see Solr listening on port 8983 [-] Still not s
And given that you configured it under Tomcat, I'd check that the logs
are generated at all first. Just as a sanity check.
Regards,
Alex.
Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even a newsletter:
http://www.solr-start.com/
On 5 March 2015 at 20:15, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 3/5/20
Thanks shamik :)
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:30 AM, shamik wrote:
> The other way you can do that is to specify the startup parameters in
> solr.in.sh.
>
> Example :
>
> SOLR_MODE=solrcloud
>
> ZK_HOST="zoohost1:2181,zoohost2:2181,zoohost3:2181"
>
> SOLR_PORT=4567
>
> You
On 3/5/2015 6:01 PM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> I'm running 4.10.3 under tomcat 7, and I have an issue with Admin UI.
>
> When I click on a "Logging" - I don't see actual entries but only:
>
>
>"No Events available"
The logging tab in the admin UI only shows log entries where the
severity of the log
Hi,
I'm running 4.10.3 under tomcat 7, and I have an issue with Admin UI.
When I click on a "Logging" - I don't see actual entries but only:
"No Events available"
and round icon circling non stop.
When I click on Level, I see the same icon, and message "Loading ...".
Is there a hint o
On 3/5/2015 3:13 PM, Martin de Vries wrote:
> I understand there is not a "master" in SolrCloud. In our case we use
> haproxy as a load balancer for every request. So when indexing every
> document will be sent to a different solr server, immediately after
> each other. Maybe SolrCloud is not able
If you google replication can cause index corruption there are two jira issues
that are the most likely cause of corruption in a solrcloud env.
- Mark
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Garth Grimm
> wrote:
>
> For updates, the document will always get routed to the leader of the
> appropriate s
I've tried a few variations, with 3 x ZK, 6 X nodes, solr 4.10.3, solr 5.0
without any success and no real difference. There is a tipping point at
around 3,000-4,000 cores (varies depending on hardware) from where I can
restart the cloud OK within ~4min, to the cloud not working and
continuous 'con
For updates, the document will always get routed to the leader of the
appropriate shard, no matter what server first receives the request.
-Original Message-
From: Martin de Vries [mailto:mar...@downnotifier.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 4:14 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subj
Hi Erick,
Thank you for your detailed reply.
You say in our case some docs didn't made it to the node, but that's
not really true: the docs can be found on the corrupted nodes when I
search on ID. The docs are also complete. The problem is that the docs
do not appear when I filter on certain
The other way you can do that is to specify the startup parameters in
solr.in.sh.
Example :
SOLR_MODE=solrcloud
ZK_HOST="zoohost1:2181,zoohost2:2181,zoohost3:2181"
SOLR_PORT=4567
You can simply start solr by running "./solr start"
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.n
This is consistent with my experience. DocValues is faster for the first call
(compared to UnInvertedField, which is what is used when there are no
DocValues), but is slower on subsequent calls.
I'm curious as to this as well, since I haven't heard anyone else before you
also mention this. I th
Some mistake in the previous email.
Here is the specs of some example query faceting on three fields (all
string type):
first call: 1+ sec (with docValues) vs. 4+ sec (w/o docValues)
subsequent calls: 100+ ms (with docValues) vs. 30+ ms (w/o docValues)
consistently
the total # of docs returned is
Hello,
I have one consideration on top of my head, would you mind to show a brief
snapshot by a sampler?
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:18 PM, lei wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm testing facet performance with vs without docValues in Solr 4.7, and
> found that on first request, performance with docValues
Here is the specs of some example query faceting on three fields (all
string type):
first call: 1+ sec (with docValues) vs. 4+ sec (w/o docValues)
subsequent calls: 30+ ms (with docValues) vs. 100+ ms (w/o docValues)
consistently
the total # of docs returned is around 600,000
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015
Hi there,
I'm testing facet performance with vs without docValues in Solr 4.7, and
found that on first request, performance with docValues is much faster than
non-docValues. However, for subsequent requests (where the queries are
cached), the performance is slower for docValues than non-docValues.
Hi,
I have a Solr instance using the clustering component (with the Lingo
algorithm) working perfectly. However when I get back the cluster
results only the ID's of these come back with it. What is the easiest
way to retrieve full documents instead? Should I parse these IDs into a
new query t
Hello,
I’ve been trying to have a pretty name for my facets on Velocity Response
Writer. Do you know how can I do that?
For example, suppose that I am faceting field1. My query returns 3 facets:
uglyfacet1, uglyfacet2 and uglyfacet3. I want to show them to the user a pretty
name, like "Pretty
Wait up. There's no "master" index in SolrCloud. Raw documents are
forwarded to each replica, indexed and put in the local tlog. If a
replica falls too far out of synch (say you take it offline), then the
entire index _can_ be replicated from the leader and, if the leader's
index was incomplete the
Whew! I was afraid that my memory was failing since I'd no memory of
ever seeing anything remotely like that!
Erick
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 6:04 AM, wrote:
> Please ignore my question.
>
> These are form field names which I created a couple of months ago, not SOLR
> query parameters.
>
> Philip
Class cast exceptions are usually the result of having a mix of old
and new jars in your classpath, or even of having the same jar in two
different places. Is this possible here?
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:44 PM, sthita wrote:
> 1.My solr.xml
>
>
>
> hostPort="8980">
> config="
I would, BTW, either just get rid of the all together or
make it much higher, i.e. 10. I don't think this is really your
problem, but you're creating a lot of segments here.
But I'm kind of at a loss as to what would be different about your setup.
Is there _any_ chance that you have some seco
Hello Mike,
How are you? This is Oded Sofer from IBM Guardium.
We had moved to SolrCloud, I thought you may be able to help me find something.
The Facet search is very slow, I do not know how to check what is the size of
our facets (gb / count).
Do you know how I can check it?
On Th
October 2014, Apache Solr™ 4.10.4 available
The Lucene PMC is pleased to announce the release of Apache Solr 4.10.4
Solr is the popular, blazing fast, open source NoSQL search platform
from the Apache Lucene project. Its major features include powerful
full-text search, hit highlighting, faceted
Hi Andrew,
Even our master index is corrupt, so I'm afraid this won't help in our
case.
Martin
Andrew Butkus schreef op 05.03.2015 16:45:
Force a fetchindex on slave from master command:
http://slave_host:port/solr/replication?command=fetchindex - from
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrRepli
Force a fetchindex on slave from master command:
http://slave_host:port/solr/replication?command=fetchindex - from
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
The above command will download the whole index from master to slave, there are
configuration options in solr to make this problem happe
We had a similar issue, when this happened we did a fetch index on each core
out of sync to put them back right again
Sent from my iPhone
> On 5 Mar 2015, at 14:40, Martin de Vries wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have index corruption on some cores on our Solrcloud running version
> 4.8.1. The index
Hi,
We have index corruption on some cores on our Solrcloud running version
4.8.1. The index is corrupt on several servers. (for example: when we do
an fq search we get results on some servers, on other servers we don't,
while the stored document contains the field on all servers).
A full re
On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 14:34 +0100, johnmu...@aol.com wrote:
> My question is this: if I put my data in multiple cores and use
> distributed search will the ranking be different if I had all my data
> in a single core?
Yes, it will be different. The practical impact depends on how
homogeneous your
Please ignore my question.
These are form field names which I created a couple of months ago, not SOLR
query parameters.
Philippe
- Mail original -
De: phi...@free.fr
À: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Envoyé: Jeudi 5 Mars 2015 14:54:26
Objet: SOLR query parameters
Hello,
could someone p
Hello,
could someone please explain what these SOLR query parameter keywords stand for:
- ppcdb
- srbycb
- as
For instance,
http://searcharchives.iht.com:8983/solr/inytapdf0/browse?ppdcb=&srbycb=&as=&q=kaiser&sort=
I could not find them in the SOLR documentation.
Many thanks.
Philippe
Hello - facetting will be the same and distributed more like this is also
possible since 5.0, and there is a working patch for 4.10.3. Regular search
will work as well since 5.0 because of distributed IDF, which you need to
enable manually. Behaviour will not be the same if you rely on average d
Hi,
I have data in which I will index and search on. This data is well define such
that I can index into a single core or multiple cores like so: core_1:Jan2015,
core_2:Feb2015, core_3:Mar2015, etc.
My question is this: if I put my data in multiple cores and use distributed
search will the ra
Thanks Erick.
So for the other audience who got stuck in same situation. Here is the
solution.
If you are able to run the remote/local zookeeper ensemble, then you can
create the Solr Cluster by the following method.
Suppose you have an zookeeper ensemble of 3 zookeeper server running on
three d
The network will "only" split if you get errors on your network hardware.
(or fiddle with iptables) Let's say you placed your zookeepers in separate
racks and someone pulls network cable between them - that will leave you
with 5 working servers but they can't reach each other. This is "split
brain
I start out with 5 zk's. All good.
One zk fails - I'm left with four. Are they guaranteed
to split 4/0 or 3/1 - because if they split 2/2 I'm screwed,
right?
Surely to start with 5 zk's (or in fact any odd number - it
could be 21 even), and from a single failure you drop to an
even number - t
37 matches
Mail list logo
