AF> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:54:26PM +1000, Robin Whittle
AF> wrote:
>> Thanks for this Abigail:
>>
>> > I have yet to see a
>> > *valid* email that is Base-64 encoded.
>>
AF> Lucky you. I see quite a few. The crappy e-mail client "Incredimail"
AF> that is unfortunately quite popular likes t
> From: Peter Campion-Bye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 6/18/2003 11:34:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Is there a way to filter mail that's forwarded?
>
> > Hi all. Trying to use my home mail server to filter my dad's mail for
> > spam. What I'm doing is I'm pulling it
Jack Gostl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Using Pine, I checked the message ID and scanned the syslog (which
> includes both spamd and sendmail entries) and located the message
> being handed off to procmail. It wasn't even slightly busy at that
> time.
Presumably procmail calls spamc? If so, th
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:54:26PM +1000, Robin Whittle wrote:
> Thanks for this Abigail:
>
> > I would simply recommend that you raise the score in the
> > local.cf file for the SA test BASE64_ENC_TEXT to near or
> > above your minimum spam threshhold. I have yet to see a
> > *valid* email that
unset LANG or set LANG=C and then start again.
--
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT
Cameron Technical Services, Inc.
(512) 454-3200 Main
http://www.camerontech.com
- Original Message -
From: "Jody Cleveland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "spamassassin_list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesda
Use the spamass-milter rpm and sendmail.mc mod at
ftp://mail.camerontech.com/pub/spam
--
Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT
Cameron Technical Services, Inc.
(512) 454-3200 Main
http://www.camerontech.com
- Original Message -
From: "Dragoncrest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for this Abigail:
> I would simply recommend that you raise the score in the
> local.cf file for the SA test BASE64_ENC_TEXT to near or
> above your minimum spam threshhold. I have yet to see a
> *valid* email that is Base-64 encoded.
Indeed. From now on such messages have a one-way tick
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Gostl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin listserve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:38 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Max children
>
> I've seen this two or three times now, and I'm not sure what to make of
> it.
>
> Outward appearance is t
* Cam Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have Razor 2.22 and spamassassin 2.55 on a Debian box. When I run
> razor-report, it goes on through the routine until the point below:
SORRY! Wrong list!
I wasn't thinking while I was typing.
Cam
--
Cam Ellison Ph.D. R.Psych.
From Roberts Creek o
I have Razor 2.22 and spamassassin 2.55 on a Debian box. When I run
razor-report, it goes on through the routine until the point below:
Jun 18 18:54:48.263365 report[31030]: [ 6] response to sent.7
-nsl=?
conceit.cloudmark.com
joy.cloudmark.com
.
Jun 18 18:54:48.263532 report[31030]: [ 8] Discove
Hi,
One of the email domains that's coming through for us is currently being
filtered by SpamAssassin. We also check messages via SpamAssasin, but
there is a discrepancy between theirs and our rules, scores, and grading.
I was wondering what configuration syntax is needed to tell SpamAssassin
> > based on what you wrote, I added a "-m 2" option to my call of spamd, to
> > limit the number of children to 2.
> > This should solve at least my problem, since the default obviously was
> > "unlimited". If that's wrong, could one of the developers or someone with
> > more insight set us strai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Theo,
Wednesday, June 18, 2003, 7:03:30 AM, you wrote:
RM>> I'm limited to ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs, and by design in the
RM>> current versions I can change rule scores, but I can't add even the
RM>> simplest of rules.
TVD> Please RTFM:
TV
> based on what you wrote, I added a "-m 2" option to my call of spamd, to
> limit the number of children to 2.
> This should solve at least my problem, since the default obviously was
> "unlimited". If that's wrong, could one of the developers or someone with
> more insight set us straight?
As a
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 12:18:39PM -0400, jeff covey wrote:
> in the meantime, my bayesian database is contaminated with 75 spam
> messages which were recorded as ham because i reported them. how can
> i keep my spam data, erase my ham data, and start training with ham
> from scratch?
I think som
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:12:53PM -0400, Steve Fulton wrote:
> An update: I removed the old and incorrect entries from my local.cf file,
> and the problem continues. When the whitelist_from entries are used in the
> local.cf file, spam is delivered even though it is marked as spam and the
> h
An update: I removed the old and incorrect entries from my local.cf file,
and the problem continues. When the whitelist_from entries are used in the
local.cf file, spam is delivered even though it is marked as spam and the
hit rate is about the threshold. When those are removed, the same spam
Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 16:38 14/06/03 +0100, Mathew Hendry wrote:
>
>> No, auto-learn learns only from mails with particularly high or low
>> scores. The default thresholds are
>>
>> auto_learn_threshold_nonspam-0.5
>> auto_learn_threshold_spam 10
>
> In fact the default settings ar
At 08:23 PM 18/06/2003 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
1) what ancient version are you running? auto_report_threshold has been
dead since something like 2.31.
v2.55. However, I did copy the original configuration from the
Qmail-Scanner site based on that authors experience. Obviously he ran a
much
At 02:59 PM 6/18/2003 -0700, Mike Batchelor wrote:
Received: from unys-2.namewithheld.com (webmail2.usainteractive.com
[209.11.17.108])
by lax1msa1.tmcs.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/200306171005) with ESMTP id
h5IJZO0q028359
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed 18 Jun 2003 12:35:24 -0700
"unys-2.n
At 06:44 PM 6/18/2003 -0400, Steve Fulton wrote:
Hi all,
I recently installed SA on a mail server, only applying globally right now
-- no individual user configurations. I've discovered that when I add
"whitelist_from ..." entries to the local.cf file, SA let's spam in that
is marked above the
Michael Boettjer said:
> No Test, No Hits. What's going wrong?
SpamAssassin is not finding the rules directory. Use the "-C" switch,
or make sure "/usr/share/spamassassin" is available nad contains the
rules files.
--j.
---
This SF.Net emai
Hi list,
Would anyone be able to please point me to a place where I can get a
SMTP proxy that will run on Win2K please?
I have managed to compile and setup SA on the box, now I just need to
intercept the email and pass it onto it.
Any help greatly appreciated.
Cheers!
M.
--
Hi all,
I recently installed SA on a mail server, only applying globally right now
-- no individual user configurations. I've discovered that when I add
"whitelist_from ..." entries to the local.cf file, SA let's spam in that is
marked above the hit threshold. With the entries removed from th
RW> Does this mean that SpamAssassin is blind to the contents of base-64
RW> encoded HTML?
Apparently so; but it does correctly identify the email as
being base-64 encoded. I would simply recommend that you
raise the score in the local.cf file for the SA test
BASE64_ENC_TEXT to near or above your
Ok, I have done everything withing my power to figure this out. I
got one thing fixed so that the libmilter lowercases the username
prior to passing it to spamd which fixed one problem. The
patch is listed below. (I know, my C sucks but it works... :)
The other issue appears to be beyond my C++
We get mail that I want to whitelist using whitelist_from_rcvd. The
Received header I am trying to match is like this:
Received: from unys-2.namewithheld.com (webmail2.usainteractive.com
[209.11.17.108])
by lax1msa1.tmcs.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/200306171005) with ESMTP id
h5IJZO0q028359
for <[EMA
Since it sounds like you don't have per-user prefs set up (but I could
be wrong about that), your best bet would probably just use all_spam_to
in your SA config, and pass *all* the spam to him. Without per-user
prefs, that's about as good as your going to get without some fairly
tricky custom
-Original Message-
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:57 PM
To: Anitech Systems
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Installing SpamAssassin, Could not open
'lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm': No such file or directory at ...
> Actual: perl /home
> Actual: perl /home/anitech/cgibin/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55/Makefile.PL
> PREFIX=/home/anitech/cgibin/sausr SYSCONFDIR=/home/anitech/cgibin/saetc
are you in /home/anitech/cgibin/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55 when you run this? If not,
that's your problem.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Cats, proof tha
Hi,
You have to use procmail for that;
This is what I have done, here I am reading user preferences from a Mysql
Database.
Run Spamd with the -q & -x option
spamd -C /etc/mail/spamassassin -d -q -x -a -u spamd
Note: you have to add a user "spamd" on the system
After starting spamd, crea
Installing SpamAssassin for Personal Use,
Warning: the following files are missing in your kit
Could not open 'lib/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm':
No such file or directory at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.0/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm line 2903.
Note: That's because it is in
/home/anitech/cgibin/Mail-SpamAss
Hi list,
i've installed SA 2.55 as filter in my postfix-installation on a SuSE
7.2-Box. SA is running as daemon (ps ax: /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/spamd -u
filter -a -x).
First On Port 25 my Antivirus-Service is waiting; then the mail is routing
to postfix, waiting on port 825. The outcut of my mas
Has anyone come across a way to whitelist certain domains for a single user? Note
that our SA installation is running on a store/forward server - no local accounts on
the machine.
I have one user that is complaining that he *wants* to receive certain spam (yeah, I
know...) I cannot simply whi
At 01:47 PM 6/18/2003 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:19:53AM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote:
It sees your entries correctly.
> spamassassin -D, against a test message and I get the following errors:
>
> debug: Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
> RCVD
What? Those weren't more pictures of Anna Kournikova? I re-tasked my
entire network of SETI machines to decrypt those files! What a waste of
214.7 years of computing power.
--On Wednesday, June 18, 2003 2:32 PM -0400 Shayne Lebrun
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that what this fine fello
Hi,
You want
score RCVD_IN_ORBS 0
^
Regards,
Rick
Lucas Albers wrote:
I am trying to set the values for rbl checks.
I add the following entries to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
RCVD_IN_ORBS 0 #no longer in service
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 4.0
RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 4.0
RCVD_IN_RELAYS_O
> First, a big "thank you" to the developers!
>
> Using the bayes learner, starting it with several 100 spams
> and about 1000 hams, and then mainly feeding it spam that
> wasn't caught in the past had a tremendously positive effect here.
> At the momemnt, spamassassin is almost perfect for us.
>
I think that what this fine fellow is talking about is when you say to
somebody "do NOT open an email with 'ILOVEYOU' as the subject!"
Then they say, literally, 'Ok, I won't. Hey, a new email! Wow, somebody
loves me! *click click*'
Implementing a properly fascist IT environment is damn hard when
I've just had to move my mail to a new host. Both have identical
versions of procmail and spamassassin, both installed from the FreeBSD
Ports collection.
SpamAssassin version 2.55
procmail v3.22 2001/09/10
There are no system-wide config files installed for either program. I
have identical copi
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Vanasco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 12:38 PM
> To: Jim Ford
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] We TEACH you how to SPAM and make a Fortune!!
>
>
>
> > I've been looking at Sugarplum spam poison and
> tee
[SNIP]
>
> Sorry Dave, I have to disagree with you here. As an admin who provides
> in-house support, I lose respect for the average human being. I cannot
> tell you how many times I have to remove virii, reinstall s/w or entire
> OSen, or remove spyware. These are adult who repeat their actions
Your method doesn't work in Outlook 2002+
Microsoft in their infinite wisdom decided that re-sent no longer should
send full headers.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Bene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:25 AM
To: David Prall; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi David,
>>
management wants me to set up an auto-reply to mails marked as spam
by SA. I
told them that this is a very bad idea, since
a.) reply addresses are fakes and not working most of the time anyway
b.) if they DO work, we will just notify the spammers that the
address they
bought/harvested is working
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 11:19:53AM -0600, Lucas Albers wrote:
> RCVD_IN_ORBS 0 #no longer in service
> RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 4.0
> RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 4.0
> RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG 4.0
>
> It appears to not see my entries correctly.
It sees your entries correctly.
> spamassassin -D, against a
Hi!
Is there any CVS mirror for SA project? Probably the
cvs.sourceforge.net is overloaded, too often aborting the connections.
ANDY
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Bec
I am trying to set the values for rbl checks.
I add the following entries to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
RCVD_IN_ORBS 0 #no longer in service
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 4.0
RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 4.0
RCVD_IN_RELAYS_ORDB_ORG 4.0
It appears to not see my entries correctly.
When I run:
spamassassin
> no, this guy takes the cake
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/51/31270.html
That's what I call "having your cake and eating it, too." That is FUNNY!
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants
Thanks to everyone contributing thoughts about this matter. I can say, that
I was able to convince management to refrain from this, using all the facts
stated here
Cheers
Ralf G.
- Original Message -
From: "Roedel, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June
> Jack,
>
> based on what you wrote, I added a "-m 2" option to my call of spamd, to
> limit the number of children to 2.
> This should solve at least my problem, since the default obviously was
> "unlimited". If that's wrong, could one of the developers or someone with
> more insight set us str
Oleg,
Direct replies to you get rejected:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host localhost[127.0.0.1] said: 550 5.7.1 Message
content rejected, UBE, id=30091-03
> I understood that Bayesian will start work automatically as soon as he
>will have enough information. This is correct, is not it?
Yes, it is.
I think its wrong. I'm thinking of removing the "-m". But I'm guessing.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Ralf Guenthner wrote:
> Jack,
>
> based on what you wrote, I added a "-m 2" option to my call of spamd, to
> limit the number of children to 2.
> This should solve at least my problem, since the default
Warren Togami said:
> On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 19:03, Clement wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Someone must have asked this, I cannot install Spamassassin 2.55
> > in RH9.0. When doing the make, this is the error message:
> >
> > Makefile:72: *** missing separator. Stop.
> >
> > Trying 2.53 gets the
Ralf Guenthner said:
> management wants me to set up an auto-reply to mails marked as spam by SA. I
> told them that this is a very bad idea, since
>
> a.) reply addresses are fakes and not working most of the time anyway
> b.) if they DO work, we will just notify the spammers that the address t
no, this guy takes the cake
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/51/31270.html
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU
Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner.
Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You G
I've been looking at Sugarplum spam poison and teergrube/tar pitting,
but
the gurus on this list seem to thing neither is a good thing.
fuck that. how about this?
1) hack their server
2) upload a shitload of metallica tracks
3) call the riaa
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Guenthner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Slightly OT: Arguments needed for not
> replying to spam
>
>
> Fellow spam-fighters,
>
> management wants me to set up an auto-repl
Jorge =?iso-8859-1?q?F=E1bregas?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll just keep watching the spam reprots regularly and If I see
something strange with Pyzor I now probably know what it is.
Better yet, subscribe to pyzor-announce. People on the list got notified
ahead of time.
It's very low traffic:
> Hi all. Trying to use my home mail server to filter my dad's mail for
> spam. What I'm doing is I'm pulling it in off of his netzero account (oh
> yeah, spam heaven) and it's supposed to be filtered as it goes through my
> server and off to the dumping account I have setup for delivering
--On Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:58 PM +0200 Ralf Guenthner
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apologies to list members! I am very sorry for confusing anyone's
message threading. Since I am stuck with an employer that uses mostly MS
stuff, I didn't notice myself.
I wasn't aware that anything remains, w
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:54:25AM -0300, Luis Hern?n Otegui wrote:
> Well, Ben, what I do is reject spam-tagged messages with a beautiful
> "data, reject=550 5.7.1 Blocked by Anti-Spam Filter",
What does the above line do, or is it just text you manually insert at the top
of the message? Also
Hi,
I've installed dcc_proc as per the spamassassin readme and I get a response
from various servers when I do cdcc 'info'. To get it to work with SA, do I
just put use_dcc 1 in my user_prefs? How will I tell if it's working OK? I
guess the answer's somewhere in the DCC docs, but there's a lot of
LDAP Storage for spamassassin has been on my 'todo' list for some time
now. I still don't have time to get involved with the development of
this, but I could devote some time with testing and feedback if it is
warranted.
Very interested in seeing this come to life!
--JST
* Colin Dean [Wed, 18
on Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:59:22PM -0400%, Theo Van Dinter said:
theo> found the bug, fixed the bug for 2.60.
thanks! i'll start reporting spam again after i upgrade to there.
in the meantime, my bayesian database is contaminated with 75 spam
messages which were recorded as ham because i re
I just installed SpamAssassin with MIMEDefang. I see in the message
headers that MIMEDefang is scanning, but I don't see anything to
indicate that SpamAssassin is working with it. I checked the mimedefang
filer in /etc/mail and see that it has the Spam Assassin code in it.
I'm thinking I must
on Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:50:22AM -0400%, Ross Vandegrift said:
ross> if you retrain Bayes with the messages in question
apparently, this thread has wandered far enough that my original
message has been forgotten. it's here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=1055869669284
Apologies to list members! I am very sorry for confusing anyone's
message threading. Since I am stuck with an employer that uses mostly MS
stuff, I didn't notice myself.
I wasn't aware that anything remains, when one takes an existing posting,
removes the body and subject and changes them to somet
At 09:51 AM 6/18/2003 -0500, Oleg Aronov wrote:
Hello,
I have question and hope that somebody will help me. Please...
So, few days ago I installed and configured SpamAssassin on
Linux. The SA
is works fine, but he is catching only about 20% of spam emails. I believe
that I should
Hi all. Trying to use my home mail server to filter my dad's mail for
spam. What I'm doing is I'm pulling it in off of his netzero account (oh
yeah, spam heaven) and it's supposed to be filtered as it goes through my
server and off to the dumping account I have setup for delivering all mail
I had that same Pod2man problem on a stock RH9 system a couple of weeks ago.
The (much appreciated) advice I got was to:
Download the tarball.
Unpack it - (tar -xzvf )
change to the dir it unpacked in, and instead of running "perl
Makefile.PL" , run
"LANG=C perl Makefile.PL"
Worked like a charm f
Posted this before without any responses, but I am stuck.
Trying to build SA on a RH 7.1 box and I get:
C compiler cannot create executables
I know some rpms are missing that are required to build executables but for
the life of me can't remember which.
Would anybody have any idea what extra r
- Original Message -
From: "D'Alessandro, Arthur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:07 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Bayesian and SpamAssassin
> That feature is enabled by default, however, it is not activated until it
> has been
Thus spake Rick Macdougall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/06/03 19:49]:
> Works globally without any hacks, but per user is a little more
> difficult to implement.
Hrmmm... I was hoping for per-user, as we have a rather large and diverse
user base. I can only see a global Bayes causing more harm than
At 10:06 AM 6/18/2003 -0400, Mike Wagner wrote:
I have a RedHat 9 box with sendmail and spamassassin running. I installed
both from the redhat cd and have done no additional configuration, other
than setting up procmail to feed to spamc. Spamassassin works great, it
detects spam and marks it as s
Jack,
based on what you wrote, I added a "-m 2" option to my call of spamd, to
limit the number of children to 2.
This should solve at least my problem, since the default obviously was
"unlimited". If that's wrong, could one of the developers or someone with
more insight set us straight?
Thanks
R
Please don't thread steal. You replied to an existing thread of
conversation and changed the subject line. That is impolite. Now
your message right in the middle of Martin Bene's thread about
"Learning from forwarded mail". How are they related? Many people
won't even read your message because
That feature is enabled by default, however, it is not activated until it
has been seeded with enough entries, off the top of my head, I cannot
remember the count.
-Art D'Alessandro
-Original Message-
From: Oleg Aronov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:51 AM
To:
Hello,
I'm trying to install the latest SA on Redhat 9.
I type in (as root):
perl -MCPAN -e shell
o conf prerequisites_policy ask
install Mail::SpamAssassin
Everything seems ok for a while, then this comes up:
CPAN.pm: Going to build J/JM/JMASON/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55.
Hello,
I have question and hope that somebody will help me. Please...
So, few days ago I installed and configured SpamAssassin on Linux. The SA
is works fine, but he is catching only about 20% of spam emails. I believe
that I should configure Bayesian with SA. Is it correct? How c
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 09:43:55PM -0400, jeff covey wrote:
> while the side issues are interesting, does anyone have answers for
> the actual questions that started this thread? :)
LOL, yes - if you retrain Bayes with the messages in question and
specifically mention that it's spam, they should
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Mike Wagner wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have a RedHat 9 box with sendmail and spamassassin running. I installed
> both from the redhat cd and have done no additional configuration, other
> than setting up procmail to feed to spamc. Spamassassin works great, it
> detects spa
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 10:06:17AM -0400, Mike Wagner wrote:
> I have a RedHat 9 box with sendmail and spamassassin running. I installed
...
> run the sa-learn command, it says that command not found. I've done a
> whereis and locate on sa-learn and can't find it anywhere. Anyone have
> any idea
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 06:47:31AM -0700, Robert Menschel wrote:
> I'm limited to ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs, and by design in the current
> versions I can change rule scores, but I can't add even the simplest of
> rules.
Please RTFM:
allow_user_rules { 0 | 1 } (default: 0)
Hi Everyone,
I have a RedHat 9 box with sendmail and spamassassin running. I installed
both from the redhat cd and have done no additional configuration, other
than setting up procmail to feed to spamc. Spamassassin works great, it
detects spam and marks it as so. However, when I ssh into my se
Norberto:
Probá con el tutorial que te adjunto, te dice cómo correrlo con un milter
para el sendmail, y con un antivirus, pero lo podés poner con SA solo, y
anda diez puntos.
El howto es bastante completo, creo que lo actualicé para que comprenda el
spamass-milter, que es el milter que estoy us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Abigail,
Tuesday, June 17, 2003, 10:41:46 PM, you wrote:
AM> The reason the spam in your case bypassed SA but got caught
AM> when you had others run it is here:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=9.0
>> tests=BASE64_ENC_TEXT, ..
But _does_ it really hurt them. They don't get any feedback - users that
install spam filters wouldn't have responded to to the spam anyway, other
than deleting it manually. The only difference is that the deletion
process is
automated by a spam filter. I reckon spammers don't really care about th
> I think, RBL is not the cause for this. I run RBL via qmail, not SA and
> sometimes there are 4/5 spamd processes when I run "ps aux" in the morning.
> I usually stop the original spamd and kill the others, then restart spamd.
> Running SA 2.54 on Suse 8.0.
> If someone could explain this, it'd
Fellow spam-fighters,
management wants me to set up an auto-reply to mails marked as spam by SA. I
told them that this is a very bad idea, since
a.) reply addresses are fakes and not working most of the time anyway
b.) if they DO work, we will just notify the spammers that the address they
bought
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Abigail,
Thanks for the guidance, but
Tuesday, June 17, 2003, 10:30:10 PM, you wrote:
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
1) SA Developers: PLEASE provide some method whereby end-users like
me can implement header, body, and uri rules
Hi Michael,
Tanks for your help!
I took your advice and raised the port number, and it helped but not on
the problems I reported in this thread. These problems seemed to be old
rule files from the prior installation of SA.
The reason for running SA as a non-root was to have a home dir. with al
Hi Theo,
Tanks for your help! You where correct that it was due to old rule files
from the prior installation of SA.
Regards,
Kim.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2003 at 02:45:26PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
I am trying to run spamd a non-root user. I am using global SA
filtering, and run both spamd and sp
Jack,
I think, RBL is not the cause for this. I run RBL via qmail, not SA and
sometimes there are 4/5 spamd processes when I run "ps aux" in the morning.
I usually stop the original spamd and kill the others, then restart spamd.
Running SA 2.54 on Suse 8.0.
If someone could explain this, it'd be g
Hi Tom,
>Drag & drop it into a public folder, hit the public folder from your
>Spamassassin machine using IMAP, save it as an MBOX on your SA machine,
>learn it from there.
Sorry, all clients are currently using POP3; there's no exchange server and
no public folders. getting all useres to setup
My bayes database(s) are constantly getting corrupted. IS there anything I
can do to prevent this?
SA 2.5.5
OSX 10.2.x
CGATE 4.06
++
Mike Yrabedra (President)
323 Incorporated
Home of MacDock, MacAgent and MacSurfshop
+-
I've seen this two or three times now, and I'm not sure what to make of
it.
Outward appearance is that we get hit with a ton of spam, or perhaps that
an RBL goes out. I wind up with many copies of spamd running, many more
than the -m parameter should allow. (And forget about procmail and
sendmail
Hi David,
>> Using bayes in a windows/outlook environment without central exchange
>> server, it's rather difficult to get at spam/ham messages for
>> learning.
>>
>
>Outlook is rather convoluted, but can be done. Open the message in its
>own window, rather then viewing in the preview window. Ac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <> wrote:
> Subject: [SAtalk] Learning from forwarded mail
>
> Using bayes in a windows/outlook environment without central exchange
> server, it's rather difficult to get at spam/ham messages for
> learning.
>
Outlook is rather convoluted, but can be done. Open the message in
I am missing something small, maybe. This is what I see:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs (1.193-2003-06-13-exp)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
autolearn=no version=2.60-cvs
X-Spam-Level:
When does autolearn=yes happen???
-Wa
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 5:14 am, Brian Read wrote:
> Thanks for this. When is "pyzor discover" normally run?
You're welcome. I didn't know the "discover" argument existed at all !
I thought they had a better|elegant way of doing this switch but that's not
the case. I've been thinking about
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
