The company I did this for is a small company, a large user base doesn't
mean a large company. The same can be said for the larger companies,
they may have an admin who makes 20 bucks an hour so their costs would
be in the $30 an hour range.
There were other considerations I didn't even
Some companies are on a small budget and can't afford the extra monies
involved, and I don't see how it's possible to determine a rate
beforehand. We don't know what may be involved in the upgrade until it
happens. For example in the scenario I gave as an example, to perform
the two upgrades
Hey all!
I'm running Slackware 8.1 which comes with perl 5.6.1.
I've been running spamd just fine since 2.55 was
released. I compile and install SA 2.60 and all goes
well. When I try to start spamd here's what I get:
Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T
switch at
On 24 Nov 2003 Fred ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[...]
SpamAssassin 2.4 is really out-dated, it's missing Bayes and thousands of
other fixes that make it a better product.
I had a good laugh on your article, you say Spend the 10 or 20 per month
per year for one of the commercial services,
I am using spamassassin with KMail.
I pipe messages through spamassassin with a starting filter with this rule:
any header matches regular expr. (dot)
This was followed by a filter with this rule:
X-Spam-Status contains Yes
This worked fine under spamassassin 2.44. About a week ago I
Clive Dove wrote:
On the assumption that the kmail filter was picking up the string BAYES in the
X-Spam-Status header, I changed the rule to this:
X-Spam-Statuscontains Yes, hits=
Can I rely on the changed rule or should I use some other rule instead?
I had this problem too and realized
Good morning, James,
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, James Nonya wrote:
I'm running Slackware 8.1 which comes with perl 5.6.1.
I've been running spamd just fine since 2.55 was
released. I compile and install SA 2.60 and all goes
well. When I try to start spamd here's what I get:
Insecure
I hardly ever post like this, but I just had to share that I thought
this post was spot-on target w/ regards to certain magazines being
anti-opensource and a bad source of objective information. Thanks
Bryan.
Always remember, buyer beware. Whoops, this mag is fully paid for
through advertising,
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:17:54AM -0800, James Nonya wrote:
I'm running Slackware 8.1 which comes with perl 5.6.1. I've been
running spamd just fine since 2.55 was released. I compile and
install SA 2.60 and all goes well. When I try to start spamd here's
what I get:
Insecure directory
No. I guess I didn't convey my meaning very well. My situation: I have a box
called postal receives all incoming mail for a few domains, runs SpamAssassin
on it, and then sends it on to the real mailserver for intended domain. The
problem is that postal can't know what users are valid on the
At 10:40 PM 11/23/03, you wrote:
Dear list...
(See what happens when I get a question answered? I come up with
more...)
Is there (I hope!!!) a way to tell spamd not to accept connections if
the system load is at or above a certain threshold? (i.e. if the system
load is currently 30, don't spawn
Hi list,
I hope this is not another RTFM-Question... My site-wide setup calls SA
v2.60 from amavisd (amavisd-new-20030616-p5). Spam gets caught however,
bayes tests are not included although they should. Here's what I have in
my local.cf:
use_bayes 1
bayes_path /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:15:35 -0500 (EST)
William Stearns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good morning, James,
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, James Nonya wrote:
I'm running Slackware 8.1 which comes with perl
5.6.1.
I've been running spamd just fine since 2.55 was
released. I compile and install SA
At 01:16 PM 11/22/2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
I thought I saw a reference to a letter that SA could automatically
generate upon encountering spam. I've got 2.60 installed, could someone
give me a pointer on how to create this letter.
--
SA itself can't generate email, period.
Lots of tools that use
Good morning, James,
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, James Nonya wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:15:35 -0500 (EST)
William Stearns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, James Nonya wrote:
I'm running Slackware 8.1 which comes with perl
5.6.1.
I've been running spamd just fine since
Hello,
How do I know if I am running through the RBL lists? I turned
sa_local_tests_only to 0 and I have skip_rbl_checks 0 and I get this for a
transaction in the log:
Nov 21 16:51:13 nabu amavis[6216]: (06216-21) ESMTP::10024
/var/amavisd/tmp/amavis-20031121T164659-06216:
[EMAIL
No... it was something during the install. I remember the question about
who to notify.
I guess I could work out a procmail recipe. I got onto this track because
of false positives. 2.60 is pretty agressive about spam catching, and
every now and then it nails a real message. If I could kick
Well, I decided to reply this to everyone as well. I'm sure Logan has been
taking a beating on this, so I'll be gentle :)
I run a patched version of SA 2.43 and I catch 99% of the spam for our
company! (The patch was a simple security issue.) This is WITHOUT Bayes OR
Net tests!! Yes, you read
This is from another list, for those of you not on SPAM-L, this is very
interesting. I guess SA could have kept this guy out of jail :)
No registration required.
http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/international.cfm?id=1295402003
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/7326032.htm
Hello!
Okay, not to pick on Miroslav, but, here is a case where a legitimate
English language e-mail has 'Windows-1251' embedded in the subject line.
So I don't think it would be fair to filter on this alone. So I ask again,
is there a way to identify when the contents are going to be a jumble
Am I right in assuming that the only place that needs the score set to 0
is RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK when easynet.nl goes offline Dec 1?
Todd
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more
Nancy McGough wrote:
On 24 Nov 2003 Fred ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[...]
SpamAssassin 2.4 is really out-dated, it's missing Bayes and thousands of
other fixes that make it a better product.
I had a good laugh on your article, you say Spend the 10 or 20 per month
per year for one of the
Some time ago, there was an announcement of patches to SA to allow for
SQL-stored Bayes databases.
I haven't seen word of this being integrated in to the main
tree since then,
but it's possible I've missed it.
Hmm... I don't recall seeing this at all; does anyone have any info on this,
We have the same setup here, with the same problem of course. One thing
we started doing a few months ago was start using a milter to limit the
incoming garbage:
http://www.snert.com/Software/milter-sender/
It basically verifies the sender address before allowing it through. It
is fairly
Some content was [SNIP]ped to a) hide our interior routing b) to remove
references to what they were touting.
Note the Sender: ydcC:\messages\names_a.txt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
where a random sender names would have been inserted.
===headers==
Received: from [SNIP] by [SNIP] with SMTP
No... it was something during the install. I remember the question about
who to notify.
That's not for email generation.. It's part of the tags added to spam messages.
When SA tags a message as spam, it adds a bit to the body of the tagged
spam, which basically says if you have
*snip*
for free on our own in our spare time?
I agree with you Fred that there's plenty to criticize about that
article, but your last paragraph is not one of them. For the vast
majority of people it is well worth $10-20 per month for spam and
virus protection. Most people would much
debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Have you got the DB_File module installed? You need it for bayes. I
take it you're running Amavisd-new as a non-root user? That user has
to be able to read bayes_toks and bayes_seen. What's your $MYHOME var
set to
At 11:26 AM 11/24/2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
No... it was something during the install. I remember the question about
who to notify.
That's not for email generation.. It's part of the tags added to spam messages.
When SA tags a message as spam, it adds a bit to the body of the tagged
spam, which
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:14:40AM -0600, Stewart, John wrote:
Some time ago, there was an announcement of patches to SA to allow for
SQL-stored Bayes databases.
I haven't seen word of this being integrated in to the main
tree since then,
but it's possible I've missed it.
I've read numerous antispam articles, and NONE have given SA justice.
I think the main reason for the poor reporting of SA is mainly due to the
fact that every one of the reviews has been done by a company that has an
agenda. That agenda being, collecting advertising funding from commercial
Hi, I have couple of questions regarding spamc/spamd.
Our email server has very heavy traffic each day (several hundred per
minute in peak time). So we are running spamd/spamc. We have noticed
some problems:
we are using sendmail. In sendmail.cf we set the local mailer
Gary Carr wrote:
This is a shame. The guy should do it for a fee and make it a small
business. They are the most affective RBLs we have used to date.
Ditto. DynaBlock is my most effective list. I would be glad to pay an
annual fee.
---
This
The messages processed by SpamAssassin come through with a header
that says something like:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.5 required=5.0
My problem is that I'd like to change this header so that it includes
a list of the tests that matched - but nothing I change in the
configuration
At 23:55 -0500 23.11.2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:52 PM 11/23/03 -0500, Angus McIntyre wrote:
Can anyone tell me what I'm overlooking? Is there some magic switch
required to get SpamAssassin to honor 'add_header' instructions?
First, run spamassassin --lint.. just as a sanity check ... Check
Title: RE: [SAtalk] Re[2]: http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/14/45FEspam_1.html?s=tc
Last I knew,
there were versions of SA that ran on Windows and Mac. :-)
You can't
please everyone, we understand that.
CIO/CTOs look
for FAST, CHEAP, and RELIABLE, and never understand they can have
On Monday 24 November 2003 10:23, Josh Endries wrote:
Clive Dove wrote:
On the assumption that the kmail filter was picking up the string BAYES
in the X-Spam-Status header, I changed the rule to this:
X-Spam-Statuscontains Yes, hits=
Can I rely on the changed rule or should I use
Next time I snip the SA version too ;)
I've posted my moans on this before. It was initially a test setup that
worked so well it was deemed production. This a personal time project with
no budget or resource allocation. I have managed to co-opt another server
and am building a new setup, but it
I've read numerous antispam articles, and NONE have given SA justice.
I think the main reason for the poor reporting of SA is mainly due to the
fact that every one of the reviews has been done by a company that has an
agenda. That agenda being, collecting advertising funding from commercial
I've had this problem randomly. Bayes tends to lock itself for some sort
of DB operation, dies midway, and then dosen't clear the lock. I've
disabled my bayes in the meantime until I move over to spamd or amavisd-new.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:33:25AM -0500, MIKE YRABEDRA wrote:
I had
-Original Message-
From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Why Bayes is so essential
Here is a spam that should convince people to turn on Bayes. This
Nigerian spam was almost certainly
So amavisd-new does use bayes, you just need to set the perms right?
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:22:09PM +, Casper Gasper wrote:
debug: bayes: no dbs present, cannot scan:
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
Have you got the DB_File module installed? You need it for bayes. I
take it
-Original Message-
From: Brook Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2003 10:28 PM
To: ML-spamassassin-talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spam filtering for an ISP
On Saturday 22 November 2003 02:52 pm, William Stearns wrote:
SpamAssassin 2.55
Hey,
How are people handling the locking issues with Bayes over NFS on a
high traffic mail server? Currently i have bayes_learn_to_journal 1
turned on, but an sa-learn --rebuild seems to be taking quite some
time (i have about a million tokens in my DB).
Has anyone had a better success rate
Just had a mail in which had different *'s and score. I was expecting these
to be the same as I egrep the file and count the stars in post
processing.
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,HTML_30_40,
Jennifer
Thanks for the response.
A good point with respect to the on/off nature of some of the rule sets.
More info for the FAQ?
I had been directed at your site and have installed those rules recommended
by Bob Menschel.
I wish to say a thank you to all the sa rules contributors for your
Logan:
I read with great displeasure your InfoWorld article on Fighting Spam, and
felt the need to make a few corrections, which unfortunately will never be
updated on your article, but perhaps point you in the direction of doing a
bit more homework next time. Your article may look 'good' to a
This may or may not be of use to people. I don't have access to the RBLs
due to firewall configuration. The firewall doesn't give any lookups in
the received line, so I have to extract the IPs and then count them up.
This script will spit out a set of rules for the largest offenders. Some
It gets even funnier, because according to this article,
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/07/18/28FEspamassassin_1.html?s=feature
, InfoWorld uses Spamassassin for themselves! According to InforWorld,
SpamAssassin is easy to install and customize. Do they even proofread
the articles before
Title: RE: [SAtalk] Re[2]: http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/14/45FEspam_1.html?s=tc
I didn't have any agenda while writing the article. I'm sure I wouldn't have gotten as many objections to my review if I'd used the latest release of SA, and I'm sure filtering performance would have
Title: RE: Re[2]: http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/14/45FEspam_1.html?s=tc
I don't have control over how articles are edited. As it was, there were six software packages in the original test, and they pulled one out because there wasn't as much room as they'd originally thought.
The
Trying to build SA on a RedHat Linux system via CPAN. In the install I get
this:
t/spamd_allow_user_rulesok
t/spamd_hup.NOK 5 Not found: flag = X-Spam-Flag: YES
t/spamd_hup.FAILED tests 3-5, 8
Failed 4/8 tests, 50.00% okay
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 04:19:56PM -0800, Logan Harbaugh wrote:
I don't have control over how articles are edited. As it was, there were six
software packages in the original test, and they pulled one out because
there wasn't as much room as they'd originally thought.
Perhaps the Editors of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Denenberg writes:
Thanks justin. is there a way to prevent the rebuild (or expire) from
happening on the nfs client side? i would rather script a frequent
rebuild/expire on the nfs server side, and just let the clients do their
thing. I get
Thanks justin. is there a way to prevent the rebuild (or expire) from
happening on the nfs client side? i would rather script a frequent
rebuild/expire on the nfs server side, and just let the clients do their
thing. I get the following error if a mail has not been seen in a
while, just want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Denenberg writes:
Hey,
How are people handling the locking issues with Bayes over NFS on a
high traffic mail server? Currently i have bayes_learn_to_journal 1
turned on, but an sa-learn --rebuild seems to be taking quite some
time (i have
While I do consider myself pretty technical, after reading the article I
don't think it is fair to spamassassin, but I dont think it was libelous
as one person suggested.
I was able to get SA installed in less than 1 hour. I downloaded the tarball,
installed it, created a .procmailrc file to
Given that the date of the article is November, 2003 and probably
was written months in advance to make the deadlines he should at the
very least have used 2.55 -- which was a darned good product. But,
the insisitence of using a year-old (at least) release seems, to me
at least, to point up
Bravo! Well Said!
-Original Message-
From: Evan Platt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: SpamAssassin
Logan:
I read with great displeasure your InfoWorld article on Fighting Spam,
and felt the need to make a few corrections,
The cost here is the key, If you have only a few users, that's one
thing. I manage 10,000 users, so those services would cost me between
70k and 150k a year... That's 3-4 good admins worth of salary for what
the yearly subscription would cost, Since using SA I have only 1
technician doing the
Martin Radford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Fri Nov 21 23:34:35 2003, Jeremy Dold wrote:
Does someone want to respond to this guy and point out the obvious?
http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/11/14/45FEspam_1.html?s=tc
It's a bit embarrassing for the journalist that he was happy to
contact
OMG! That is funny as hell! :-)
Kevin Railsback is Test Center operations manager at InfoWorld.
Maybe he doesn't work there anymore! Did you email that to the author?
--Chris
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Dold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 2:32 PM
http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=showfile=faq04.017.htp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Munday
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Score
Just had a mail in
I think a correction should be printed saying that they tested an old
version and that even Infoworld uses spamassassin internally on its own
servers. See the 7/18/2003 article written by Kevin Railsback, IT guy at
Infoworld. Perhaps some insights from Mr. Railsback would highlight why
After
How do i check verbosely which RBLs are gettting called? I have the
following in my local.cf file, however the -D output shows 11 RBL's
getting queried. can someone advise whats going on here?
thanks
-D output
--
@40003fc27bed0f8bddb4 debug: RBL: success for 10 of 11 queries
I run the spam
filtering system at my company and I have been reluctant to add the new evil
rules or any new rules since about a month ago when I changed the system so that
spams where bounced rather than tagged.
If I added the new
rules would I likely increase my false positives? Right
Chris Santerre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Railsback is Test Center operations manager at InfoWorld.
Maybe he doesn't work there anymore! Did you email that to the author?
OMG! I know him! He used to be one of the help desk guys here at Texas
AM back when he was an undergrad!.
(if it's
Hi
I have redhat 7.3 with two 600 processors
I recently upgraded from 2.54 to 2.6 and i use perl
5.6.1 and sendmail.
It works great to filter the spam !
but..
The system load seems to be very high!
At times the load is over 25, goin to the most i
have seen
50.02
I use the
At 10:58 21/11/2003 -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
I'm getting a crash and core-dump when I try to run
sa-learn -D --force-expire on my sizeable bayes database.
Here's the output I get, and the backtrace from the core file.
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? no
debug: using
The FP rate
for all of these is just about zero. I recommend popcorn, weeds, and backhair
and see how it goes from there. Then take evilrules, cut the bottom half off,
and see how it goes. Then try the whole evilrules.
How many
emails do you get a day on the system? How much memory? CPU?
The
system is a P2-266 with 256 megs of ram and it handles ~2250 emails
a day.
-Original Message-From: Chris Santerre
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, November 24,
2003 2:39 PMTo: 'Matt Van Gordon'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sourceforge. Net (E-mail)Subject: RE: [SAtalk]
Chris Santerre said:
The FP rate for all of these is just about zero. I recommend popcorn,
weeds,
and backhair and see how it goes from there. Then take evilrules, cut the
About zero, sure, but definately not zero :)
The only false positive I've had so far was pushed over the threshold
(5.0)
Nov 24 20:12:16 ns3 MailScanner[2953]: SpamAssassin installation could not
be found
Mailscanner could not find spamassasin, So how could I tell it find it?
Tunc
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 02:49:10PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
to my v0 bayes database. Is there any way to do an expiry run on a v0
database with 2.60 without upgrading the DB to v2? I'd like to pare
down the size of the DB before I upgrade.
Nope. 2.60 can only write v2.
Can it be done with
Simon Byrnand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I could be wrong, but I'd say that bus error means your system
either ran right out of memory (including virtual memory) during the
execution of sa-learn (and sa-learn using extremely large amounts of
memory is possible in some circumstances) or the
What are some of the setups out there? What score do you delete at?
I don't delete them either. What happens on our setup, is that anything
that scores over 5.0 gets moved to an automatic SPAM queue, where are users
can go to check which messages were caught, and choose to send them to their
and how can i throttling the number of simultaneous instances.
In postfix, you can specify local_destination_concurrency_limit and
default_destination_concurrency_limit, which will control how many are
delivered to spamd at any given time. I am using a setup by which I'm
specifying the content
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 02:49:10PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
to my v0 bayes database. Is there any way to do an expiry run on a v0
database with 2.60 without upgrading the DB to v2? I'd like to pare
down the size of the DB before I upgrade.
Nope.
I tag at 5.0 and delete (don't deliver) at 10.0
I see false positives between 5.0 and 9.9 but not over 10.0
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Chapman
Sent: 24 November 2003 21:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] What
Simon Byrnand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 14:49 24/11/2003 -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
Fair enough. I have been having problems with having enough memory
for bayes operations. In an attempt to resolve them, I've gone back
to my v0 bayes database. Is there any way to do an expiry run on a v0
At 14:49 24/11/2003 -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
Simon Byrnand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I could be wrong, but I'd say that bus error means your system
either ran right out of memory (including virtual memory) during the
execution of sa-learn (and sa-learn using extremely large amounts of
memory
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 03:55:51PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
expired old Bayes database entries in 894 seconds
5264 entries kept, 2169216 reprieved, 0 deleted
token frequency: 1-occurence tokens: 0.04%
token frequency: less than 8 occurrences: 0.02%
What does is mean for entries to be
Hello,
I made changes to my local.cf file, and they don't seem to be taken. I modified the
lines to :
# Whether to change the subject of suspected spam
rewrite_subject 1
# Text to prepend to subject if rewrite_subject is used
subject_tag ##SPAM##
and yet, STILL I get
Anyone have any good obfuscation rules for p4r1s h1|+0n spam? I'm
getting a ton of these every day...
http://sandgnat.com/cmos/cmos.jsp gave me a good result, but will not match
a plus sign to substitue for a 't' character.
-id
---
This
--On Sunday, November 23, 2003 4:19 PM -0800 Logan Harbaugh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The article as I originally wrote it wasn't intended to be
anti-SpamAssassin, but I'd still have to say that even if the performance
at catching spam and false positives were comparable to the other
--On Monday, November 24, 2003 4:24 PM -0800 Logan Harbaugh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The point of using the old version of SpamAssassin was to show how much
the technology has changed in the last few years. That was stated in my
original article but edited out of the final version. (I love
Well, I wrote that part of it myself. Basically, after SA tags the message
as [SPAM], a header check on Postfix HOLDs the message to
/usr2/spool/postfix/hold/*/*. At regular intervals (once every 15 minutes),
my script runs and pulls apart those held messages, and extracts the To,
From, Date,
Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 03:55:51PM -0800, Ted Cabeen wrote:
expired old Bayes database entries in 894 seconds
5264 entries kept, 2169216 reprieved, 0 deleted
token frequency: 1-occurence tokens: 0.04%
token frequency: less than 8 occurrences: 0.02%
At 11/24/03 04:21 PM , Mairhtin O'Feannag wrote:
I made changes to my local.cf file, and they don't seem to be taken.
If you're using spamd, did you turn off spamd and restart it? It only reads
its config on startup.
--Kai MacTane
Haven't seen the spam but one of these should work if your example text is always the
same:
headerYM_HS_OBFU_PARIS Subject =~ /\bp4r1s\b/i
describe YM_HS_OBFU_PARIS Subject contains p4r1s
score YM_HS_OBFU_PARIS 10.0
body YM_B_OBFU_PARIS /\bp4r1s\b/i
describe YM_B_OBFU_PARIS
Haven't seen the spam but one of these should work if your
example text is always the same:
No, it's different... started out being non-obfuscated, but has gradually gotten more
and more l337.
-id
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Hello,
We are currently using Spamassassin + sendmail + spamass-milter to tag
our mail, but we would like to not have outgoing mail scanned. lda and
outgoing mail are on the same box. I have tried to just use
spamassassin+procmail but the load spawned a million procmail instances
and
Here is a net block of a spammer in training
and had the misfortune (on our network at least)
to hit one of our control addresses (repeatedly)
inetnum: 203.192.162.192 - 203.192.162.255
netname: HAN-SERVER-KR-NETBLK1
country: KR
descr:Hanserver.Net
The following is the
Yes, this would give the message a 100+ score but what I want to do is
reduce load on the box and not scan outgoing mail at all.
Thanks,
Chris
Stevens, John wrote:
I have a line like this in my local.cf:
whitelist_from *my.domain.name
TUSC
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 16:58:19 -0500, Matt Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I have been deleting at a score of 5 via Mimedefang. I notice that
some spam is scoring at 3.5 and 4ish. Is is better to tag at say
3-4.9 and delete if it is any higher?
What are some of the setups out
Hello,
We get approximately 1 gig of mail per day, and our system catches
(yesterday at least) 41,185 spam messages per day. This setup, too, is used
as simply a relay to an IMail server running on a Windows machine. Our SPAM
queue works independent of the Windows pop3 mailserver.
Richard
Hey,
I have 2.55 and 2.60 running. I would like to use report_safe 2, to
attach any mime dangerous spam messages. This seems to work in 2.55,
however in 2.6, every spam message appears to be getting attached as an
attachment with the message saying Spam software has detected.
Shouldnt
Scott wrote:
| Having a single spam folder is a very bad decision
| I never delete automatically, but the high catagory gets a 10 second
| glance every week, medium gets 20 seconds every week, and low gets 10
| seconds a day. Even when I 'delete', I am archiving it for my own spam
| processing
At 16:58 24/11/2003 -0500, Matt Chapman wrote:
Hello,
I have been deleting at a score of 5 via Mimedefang. I notice that some
spam is scoring at 3.5 and 4ish. Is is better to tag at say 3-4.9 and
delete if it is any higher?
What are some of the setups out there? What score do you delete at?
ok scratch this, appears every message with report_safe 0 does this.
thats fine.
however, i also notice that report_safe seems to be removing (or not
preserving) the headers when the message gets re-written. The headers
in the report are correct (bottom part of the message), however they
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
