Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 January 2004 05:55
To: Thomas Kinghorn; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] bayes question: HAM
At 02:10 PM 1/27/04 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
While using spamd -D, I can see the messages being learned
At 08:10 AM 1/28/04 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
My spamd is running as xadmin
xadmin 17057 1 0 Jan27 ?00:00:22 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -d -a -u xadmin
Do I need to run sa-learn as xadmin
If so, I could kick myself, I have been training it while logged in as
Kettler'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] bayes question: HAM
Sorry about that.
My spamd is running as xadmin
xadmin 17057 1 0 Jan27 ?00:00:22 /usr/bin/perl -T -w
/usr/bin/spamd -d -a -u xadmin
Do I need to run sa-learn as xadmin
If so, I could kick myself, I
At 02:10 PM 1/27/04 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
While using spamd -D, I can see the messages being learned as ham.
However, while doing a spamassasin -D --lint, it shows only 1 ham.
sa-learn --dump magic shows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] exim]# sa-learn --dump magic
snip
I have attached the --lint
Mike Schrauder
Specialty Blades, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Ross Tsolakidis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2004 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] general question about usage of SA
Hi all,
Can I only filter selected domains even individual mailboxes
On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 15:05, Ross Tsolakidis wrote:
Hi all,
Can I only filter selected domains even individual mailboxes ?
Is this possible ? I was told that qmail was most likely not a good
choice for this as the mail handler in qmail is not very
customisable. Is this true ?
If so, can
Hi
all,
Can I
only filter selected domains even individual mailboxes ?
Is this
possible ? I was told that qmail was most likely not a good choice for
this as the mail handler in qmail is not very customisable. Is this true
?
If so,
can anyone recommend an alternative for our clients who
Hi List.
While using spamd -D, I can see the messages being learned as ham.
However, while doing a spamassasin -D --lint, it shows only 1 ham.
sa-learn --dump magic shows
[EMAIL PROTECTED] exim]# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: bayes db version
and noticed that the tagging configuration is specified twice, once in
amavisd.conf, and again in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. There
doesn't seem to be any reason as to why one setting is specified in one
place, and and not the other. What is the point of specifying settings
in the local.cf,
I'm getting really confused on all these custom rules...
There is a weeds.cf and a weeds_2.cf. Should I be running both of them or
is weeds_2.cf an updated version of weeds.cf?
--
Gerry
The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne Chaucer
I'm getting really confused on all these custom rules...
There is a weeds.cf and a weeds_2.cf. Should I be running both of them or
is weeds_2.cf an updated version of weeds.cf?
--
Gerry
Hi Gerry,
Weeds2 in a more restrictive version of weeds for those that are worried
about false
Hi all,
I was paging through the wiki:
http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/IntegratedInMta
and noticed that the tagging configuration is specified twice, once in
amavisd.conf, and again in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. There
doesn't seem to be any reason as to why one setting is specified in one
Hello Rocky,
Wednesday, January 14, 2004, 8:53:25 PM, you wrote:
RO I'm writing some custom rules and i am wondering if there is a list
RO somewhere of what parts of the header i can test? such as
RO header NO_REAL_NAME From =~
RO header TO_HAS_SPACESTo:addr =~
First
I'm writing some custom rules and i am wondering if there is a list
somewhere of what parts of the header i can test? such as
header NO_REAL_NAME From =~
header TO_HAS_SPACESTo:addr =~
^
Hello all,
I am using sa 2.55 on my main windows based mail server and all is working
fine.
My question is I am having my users that get a spam message that slips
through to forward the message as an attachment, so the actual attachment
is the original email, to a spam mailbox that I then have a
Hi to all,
If I would ask to friends to send their spam to a mailbox so that I can
teach SA to be more intelligent, how would I feed the mailbox to SA
without the spam being assigned to the forwarder of the mail, i.e. say
that one user sends me 10 email which are spam, I would not want
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] whitelist question
At 02:08 PM 12/28/03 -0800, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], root,
Super-User
but unix system messages like the one below still get trapped as
spam. I
thought
What version of SA does this web page reference?
http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
It makes mention of deprecated items in version greater than 2.60.
Having use_auto_whitelist in my local.cf file for SA v 2.61 gives me an
error on --lint.
The exact error is:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 12:09:36PM -0500, Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
What version of SA does this web page reference?
http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
apparently 2.70. :(
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
It is our job to protect the magic smoke ... - Prof.
I need to make some entries in whilist_from_rcvd. But the only hostnames in
the Received: header that I can trust, are not resolveable. Does that
matter? Is it a simple pattern/string match, or does SA also try to
resolve the hostname?
Like this:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you have multiple whitelist_from_rcvd line for the same domain? I
can't seem to get it to work or I am completely missing something. For
example Sprint will send from different mail hosts at different domains
(rDNS)
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprint.com
whitelist_from_rcvd
I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is NOT the same
domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same
servers and owned by the same people.
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprint.com
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] sprintspectrum.com
Terry
Terry Milnes wrote:
I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is
NOT the same
domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same
servers and owned by the same people.
I'm aware that sprintspectrum.com sprint.com aren't the same
domain, that is
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
Terry Milnes wrote:
I am not exactly sure what you want, sprintspectrum.com is
NOT the same
domain as sprint.com, its irelevant that it may be hosted on the same
servers and owned by the same people.
I'm aware that sprintspectrum.com sprint.com aren't the same
No not entirely, apologies aren't necessary perhaps its me being thick
as a plank todayg
me, too.
If mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] can come from different mail servers
@sprint, then surely you would need:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED] which would cover the host name.
This wouldn't
Hi all, I have downloaded the latest versions from http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
and placed them
in ~/.spamassassin/*.cf
Can someone confirm that SA will find all the *.cf files in this dir and run them?
Rgds, Simon
://useast.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html
--Larry
-Original Message-
From: S. M. C. Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] *.cf question
Hi all, I have downloaded the latest versions from
http
: Friday, December 19, 2003 9:22 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] *.cf question
You will want to put your custom .cf files in /etc/mail/spamassassin.
You
can put them in /usr/share/spamassassin but they will be deleted during
an
upgrade so it really does not make sense
At 12:10 PM 12/19/2003, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
Hi all, I have downloaded the latest versions from
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htmhttp://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm
and placed them in ~/.spamassassin/*.cf
Can someone confirm that SA will
-Original Message-
From: S. M. C. Butler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thx for the info larry. Can I place a blacklists.cf file in
/etc/mail/spamassassin and will it be read in conjunction to
any blacklist information I place in my ~/.spamassassin/local.cf
file?
Yes, SA will read
, transcriptions, photos and more check out
www.SiButler.com
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 10:10 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] *.cf question
-Original Message-
From: S
At 01:28 PM 12/19/2003, S. M. C. Butler wrote:
Sorry I meant user_prefs in ~/.spamassassin - Will SA take the composite
list of blacklist information in /etc/mail/spamassassin/blacklist.cf and
the ones in ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs
Yes.
User_prefs is additive as far as blacklist entries are
I installed Spamassain a couple of days ago, on a Debina machine, and at
frst it seemed to work great, catching all but a few spam messages. Then I
used sa-learn to teach it using hundreds of stored mails I have in my mail
folders (mostly from mailing lists). Now it seesm to be missing nearly
At 06:48 PM 12/10/2003, stan wrote:
Did I do wrong by teaching it with lots of _good_ messages? Should I reset
it to the base rules, and start over? BTW how can I do that?
Idealisticaly you want to train it with something realistic in terms of
spam/ham ratio.. ie: something close to what you get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
At 06:48 PM 12/10/2003, stan wrote:
Did I do wrong by teaching it with lots of _good_ messages? Should I reset
it to the base rules, and start over? BTW how can I do that?
Idealisticaly you want to train it with something
Hello, I have this as my filter.sh file under postfix and it works just find. The log
file /tmp/currentspamlist.txt holds each transaction that we have. What I would like
to do is to also capture weather or not the email was a spam. I was thinking that I
could make a second call to spamc
I've got a quick perl question:
I have a 'badrule' which searches for / badtext / and gives lots of
points
I have another 'goodrule' which searches for / badtext goodtext / and
subtracts lots of points (enough to more than counteract the effects of
badrule containing 'xyz')
My problem: if the
- Original Message -
From: Marvin Raab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 1:18 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] perl question
How do I contruct a proper perl expression to search
for / badtext goodtext / where the seaprating character
can be a space
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marvin,
Saturday, November 22, 2003, 4:06:09 PM, you wrote:
MR I have a 'badrule' which ...
MR I have another 'goodrule' which ...
MR My problem: if the spam contains badtext followed by a carriage
MR return instead of a space and then
Hello
I think I figured something out, and I just want to confirm:
Am I correct in understanding now that the SQL user preferences system only
works when you run Spam Assassin through Procmail? Can it be set up to run
from the Spamass-Milter?
Thanks.
Tim
Very helpful tool for regex
http://weitz.de/regex-coach/
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Robert Menschel
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:00 AM
To: Christopher Eykamp
Cc: Spamassassin Talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RegEx Question
I am pretty good at regex, but am stumped by this seemingly easy problem:
How can I match the following: s\.ex and se\.x and s\.e\.x but not
sex without including all the possible permutations? Is there an elegant
solution?
Thanks,
Chris
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:34:53PM -0800, Christopher Eykamp wrote:
How can I match the following: s\.ex and se\.x and s\.e\.x but not
sex without including all the possible permutations? Is there an elegant
solution?
Well, I have two thoughts on this.
1) you're trying to do something
er, I mean you should try...
BODY SEX /\bsex\b/
...if you want it to do stuff
(gotta name the rule)
Chris
Chris Thielen said:
My obfuscation script can do the dirty work for ya...
http://sandgnat.com/cmos/ .
Click the link to the live rule generator and try:
BODY /\bsex\b/
Make sure to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Christopher,
Tuesday, November 4, 2003, 5:34:53 PM, you wrote:
CE I am pretty good at regex, but am stumped by this seemingly easy
problem:
CE How can I match the following: s\.ex and se\.x and s\.e\.x but
CE not sex without including all the
My obfuscation script can do the dirty work for ya...
http://sandgnat.com/cmos/ .
Click the link to the live rule generator and try:
BODY /\bsex\b/
Make sure to check match obfu only. (the trick is the negative look-ahead)
HTH,
Chris
P.S. lotsa Chris's around here,eh?
Theo Van Dinter said:
On
Robert Menschel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CE How can I match the following: s\.ex and se\.x and
s\.e\.x but CE not sex without including all the possible
permutations? Is there CE an elegant solution?
Would /\bs\.?e\.?x\b/ work?
No, because that matches sex. But this would work:
just got a spam that SA 2.55 not only didn't catch, but specifically let
through because of whitelisting. I don't have a manual whitelist that
matches this message, but I do have auto-whitelist turned on.
Is there a way to parse the auto whitelist files and see what's in them?
I'm concerned that
Jack Coates wrote:
just got a spam that SA 2.55 not only didn't catch, but specifically let
through because of whitelisting. I don't have a manual whitelist that
matches this message, but I do have auto-whitelist turned on.
Is there a way to parse the auto whitelist files and see what's in them?
Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list:
Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3201]: Message h9UMAPR07828 from
61.59.154.73 ()
to userdomain.com is spam, SpamAssassin (score=28.325, required
5, BAYES_99
6.00, FORGED_AOL_RCVD 4.10, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 2.57,
FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML 1.00,
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Log Question...
Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list:
Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3201]: Message h9UMAPR07828 from
61.59.154.73 ()
to userdomain.com is spam, SpamAssassin (score=28.325, required
5, BAYES_99
6.00
At 11:18 AM 10/31/2003, Dan Tappin wrote:
Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list:
Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3201]:
snip
Is there a config option to have these triggered rules logged like that? My
maillog simply has mail identified or not identified as spam. It would be
great
Ahhh... that would explain it. I did not realize that. Nevermind...
Thanks Matt,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Log Question...
At 11
-Original Message-
From: Dan Tappin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Log Question...
Below is a snippet from a recent post to the list:
Oct 30 14:12:40 ns1 MailScanner[3201]: Message h9UMAPR07828 from
Hallo und guten Tag SA-List,
I never seem to get DCC hits, even though I should. Why?
I have read the faq and make the test:
spamassassin -tD spam.txt
This test give an output with dcc-header.
But in the normal use is nothing to seen.
--snip
X-Spam-DCC: :
--snap
How must I use the dcc?
--
Title: Re: [SAtalk] GA Question
1) The documentation says a large corpus is necessary. How
large are we talking? 1000? 10,000? 1,000,000 messages?
Hi Philip --
we used about 200,000 last time.
We're getting about 80%/5% true positive / false positive rates right now. We have
Title: GA Question
I'm trying to run the GA against my corpus of mail to see how much improvement I can get from the new rule weightings. A couple questions:
1) The documentation says a large corpus is necessary. How large are we talking? 1000? 10,000? 1,000,000 messages?
2) The
Title: GA question
I'm trying to run the GA against my corpus of mail to see how much improvement I can get from the new rule weightings. A couple questions:
1) The documentation says a large corpus is necessary. How large are we talking? 1000? 10,000? 1,000,000 messages?
2) The
Philip Tucker writes:
I'm trying to run the GA against my corpus of mail to see how much improvement I can
get from the new rule weightings. A couple questions:
1) The documentation says a large corpus is necessary. How large are we talking?
1000? 10,000? 1,000,000 messages?
Hi
Hallo ,
I wont to know, why DCC not working.
I`ve just installed on my system. ( Debian 3.0 )
The output is:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp)
X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 11 times.
X-Spam-DCC: :
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: Yes,
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:13 PM
To: SA-List
Subject: [SAtalk] DCC question
Hallo ,
I wont to know, why DCC not working.
I`ve just installed on my system. ( Debian 3.0 )
The output is:
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp)
X-Spam
Hallo Matt Kettler,
am Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2003, 20:13:24, schriebst Du:
At 01:12 PM 10/8/2003, Jim Knuth wrote:
I wont to know, why DCC not working.
I`ve just installed on my system. ( Debian 3.0 )
The output is:
You won't be able to tell anything about DCC by looking at message headers.
At 01:12 PM 10/8/2003, Jim Knuth wrote:
I wont to know, why DCC not working.
I`ve just installed on my system. ( Debian 3.0 )
The output is:
You won't be able to tell anything about DCC by looking at message headers.
It could just be that the message in question was listed in razor and
pyzor,
Hallo VonEssen, John,
am Mittwoch, 8. Oktober 2003, 20:09:39, schriebst Du:
3. Run /your/path/to/cdcc 'info' and make sure it returns a list of
this is the result:
# 10/08/03 20:45:13 CEST /var/dcc/map
# Re-resolve names after 22:19:23
# 196.24 ms threshold, 168.70 ms average12 total, 11
Hi,
I received a spam that got scored only 4.4 yet it had
BAYES_80 as well as FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD.
I'm not very familiar with how much these tags _should_ be
scored, but shouldn't a FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD have a
reasonably high score? And BAYES_80, typically how much does
that contribute?
I know
Is there anyway to configure SA to not check spam status for certain
mailboxes? IE: my hr dept wants their resume acct not tag any email as
spam - regardless. I guess - is there a way to whitelist recepients?
Thank you
Jennifer Fountain
I currently use SA with Qmailscanner. I guess I can add these
mailboxes to my tcp.smtp db?
-Original Message-
From: Sean McCrohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:08 AM
To: Jennifer Fountain
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Silly question about
October 2003 14:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox
Is there anyway to configure SA to not check spam status for certain
mailboxes? IE: my hr dept wants their resume acct not tag any email as
spam - regardless. I guess - is there a way
in your local.cf file add the following:
all_spam_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
read to docs!
-
Frederic Tarasevicius
- Original Message -
From: Jennifer Fountain [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:42 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] Silly question about
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 09:42:31AM -0400 or thereabouts, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
Is there anyway to configure SA to not check spam status for certain
mailboxes? IE: my hr dept wants their resume acct not tag any email as
spam - regardless. I guess - is there a way to whitelist recepients?
(or the HR department) ordered! :-)
/s/ John Parken
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:spamassassin- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jennifer Fountain
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:spamassassin-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer Fountain
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 9:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox
Is there anyway to configure SA
At 09:42 AM 10/1/03 -0400, Jennifer Fountain wrote:
Is there anyway to configure SA to not check spam status for certain
mailboxes? IE: my hr dept wants their resume acct not tag any email as
spam - regardless. I guess - is there a way to whitelist recepients?
SA itself does not have access to
.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jennifer
Fountain
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 8:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Silly question about whitelist to a certain mailbox
Is there anyway
I'm sure this is a stupid question, but it's been that kind of day...
I just upgraded to 2.60, and I'd like to turn on maximum logging for a
few days. What do I put in the config file to enable maximum logging
(preferably to a file, but I can live with syslogd if I must)?
Mike-
Mornings:
I keep getting this in my maillog. Any ideas how to fix it or should I not
worry about it?
Sep 30 09:10:36 altair spamd[378]: debug: auto-learning failed: lock: 378
cannot create tmp lockfile
/root/.spamassassin/bayes.lock.altair.colorspan.com.378 for
/root/.spamassassin/bayes.lock: Permission
Hi there,
I am using sendmail and wat ot install spamassassin. The way sendmail is
configured is all the incoming mails comes to sendmail(on Linux box) and
then its get forwarded to MS Exchange server. The outgoing mails comes
from Exchange server to Sendmail and goes out.
I want to install SA so
Check out MIMEDefang, amavisd, spamass-milter, or one of the other
packages that can tie SpamAssassin to Sendmail.
Vivek Kumar wrote:
Hi there,
I am using sendmail and wat ot install spamassassin. The way sendmail is
configured is all the incoming mails comes to sendmail(on Linux box) and
then
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Patrick Morris wrote:
Check out MIMEDefang, amavisd, spamass-milter, or one of the other
packages that can tie SpamAssassin to Sendmail.
Vivek Kumar wrote:
Hi there,
I am using sendmail and wat ot install spamassassin. The way sendmail is
configured is all the incoming
]
Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes question: Can I change the number of messages
required before bayes kicks in?
I have a low volume mail server and do not get many spams. In
the past 2
months I have only been able to collect 120 spams to feed the
bayes. (I have
over 1000 hams in the datatbase.) I
I have a low volume mail server and do not get many spams. In the past 2
months I have only been able to collect 120 spams to feed the bayes. (I have
over 1000 hams in the datatbase.) I would like to enable bayes at this
point. I thought I saw a command to set minimum number of bayes entries
I am about to upgrade fro SA2.6 (pre-rc1) to SA2.6 final release. I see
in the docs that if I want to continue to use Bayes, I have to install
DB_File and run sa-learn --import.
Ok, doesn't sound too bad.
But where do I get DB_File? (RH 8)
--
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:00:55PM -0500, Chris Barnes wrote:
But where do I get DB_File? (RH 8)
I would think RH8 either already installed it for you (rpm -q
perl-DB_File), or you could grab the RPM.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
The Internet treats censorship like damage and routes around
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:00:55PM -0500, Chris Barnes wrote:
I am about to upgrade fro SA2.6 (pre-rc1) to SA2.6 final release. I see
in the docs that if I want to continue to use Bayes, I have to install
DB_File and run sa-learn --import.
Ok, doesn't sound too bad.
But where do I get
I tried to do an install DB_File and got an error. It say:
version.c, line 30.10: 1506-296 (S) #include file db.h not found
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, mikea wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:00:55PM -0500, Chris Barnes wrote:
I am about to upgrade fro SA2.6 (pre-rc1) to SA2.6 final release. I
I have just installed v2.55. I have been getting non stop message like
the one attached. I have tried to creat a rule but cannot seem to stop
this from coming in. I just recently added score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE
10.10 to my 50_score.cf file and still no luck.
Any suggestions would be great.
Please remember not to post in HTML.
Fred I-IS.COM wrote:
---cut---
When spamd receives a connection, it spawns a child to handle the
request. The child will expect to read an email message from the
network socket, which should then be closed for writing on the other
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003, Bruce Pennypacker wrote:
Jim wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 11:00:40PM +0500, Ivar Magne Auestad wrote:
You are writing in the FAQ that you don't focus on viruses, but I have a
suggestion. It would be very easy to add attachment type as a qualifyer.
Very many
Dear All ,
Kindly note tham am new to spammassassin , and i have sun solaries 7 ,
sparc4 , server .
with sendmail 8.9.3 ... can i install Spamassassin or not ???!!
Thanks ,
Muhannad
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan
I need help from the dev team!
In the docs for spamD, it has the following:
---cut---
When spamd receives a connection, it spawns a child to handle
the request. The child will expect to read an email message from the
network socket, which should then be closed for writing on the other end (so
I'm a bit confused. I've installed SA 2.55 last week and everything seemed to
work as planned. I'm running it via procmail using the example shipped. The
problem I'm having is that there is no tagging ( 'X-Spam' ) in the header on
the actuall spam I'm recieving, but the 'real' mail get tagged.
I have an odd question.
Does anyone know of a website, or some sort of thing to SIGN MYSELF UP FOR
SPAM? Or get on some lists?
I am going to test my spam filter, and this is the best way I can think of
:-)
regards.
---
This sf.net email is
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 15:22:59 -0600 Alan Fullmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an odd question.
Does anyone know of a website, or some sort of thing to SIGN MYSELF UP FOR
SPAM? Or get on some lists?
I am going to test my spam filter, and this is the best way I can think of
:-)
Hi,
I can CC you on my spam, about 600 a day, if you want :)
Regards,
Rick
Alan Fullmer wrote:
I have an odd question.
Does anyone know of a website, or some sort of thing to SIGN MYSELF UP FOR
SPAM? Or get on some lists?
I am going to test my spam filter, and this is the best way I can
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 03:22:59PM -0600, Alan Fullmer is rumored to have said:
Does anyone know of a website, or some sort of thing to SIGN MYSELF UP FOR
SPAM? Or get on some lists?
First, I'd use a throw-away address (I'm guessing you were going to do this already).
Then, just post a few
--On Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:22 PM -0600 Alan Fullmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an odd question.
Does anyone know of a website, or some sort of thing to SIGN MYSELF UP FOR
SPAM? Or get on some lists?
I am going to test my spam filter, and this is the best way I can think
Hi Alan,
You can download an archive at Spam Archive.
http://www.spamarchive.org/
--Larry
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fullmer
I have an odd question.
Does anyone know of a website, or some sort of thing to SIGN
MYSELF UP FOR SPAM? Or get on some lists?
I am going to
Hi all,
I have installed SpamAssassin on a FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE box from
/usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin. I am currently reading through
/usr/local/share/doc/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin/USAGE, specifically:
Test it:
spamassassin -t sample-nonspam.txt nonspam.out
Steve, did you hear back from any body about this? Any body know the
answer?
-Original Message-
From: Cowles, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 12:11 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] whitelist_from_rcvd question.
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote
Mike Kuentz (2) wrote:
Steve, did you hear back from any body about this? Any body know the
answer?
Mike,
I never did get a reply to my orignal post. But I did find a work around to
the whitelist_rcvd_from not working with my implementation of postfix/SA. I
ended up adding my own custom
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
