are remote - I'm not testing a new
kernel if I might not be able to connect back to the machine!)
Regards,
Tim.
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Philip Ross wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tim Woodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:16 PM
Subject
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Martin Moreira wrote:
Before nothing thank you for the work.
I installed Mandrake 9.1 and the speedtouch driver.
I didn't have problems with that, everything was ok.
I tested the ppp connection with
ifconfig ppp0
and I have the message... But I can't connect to
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Edouard Gomez wrote:
The little omission in atm.c (regarding the congestion-bit) is still there,
and I can tell you: I get tons of 'em, leading to tons of CRC-errors.
And the length-error in pppoa3 is still there..
Just post them, i'll update them if
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Ok Overbeek (mz) wrote:
To those with persisting CRC-errors!
Who is in for a test of an updated version of pppoa3?
This version will cure your ailments
On your request I will send you the source on your
private address.
Any more developments on this? I
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003, Philip Ross wrote:
I've just installed the latest errata kernel (2.4.20-18.7,
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-187.html) on my RedHat 7.2 box and I
am getting errors when starting modem_run (Speedtouch 1.2 beta 1):
Yes, I've seen the same thing today.
Regards,
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003, Philip Ross wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tim Woodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 3:26 PM
Subject: [speedtouch] Re: Problems with latest RedHat errata kernel
(2.4.20-18.7)
I've just installed the latest errata
Does anyone know what has happened to the mailing list archive?
I am having some problems talking someone setting up a system with
a frog with a serial number that ends in 02. (I set the machine up with
my 05 frog and it worked for me. Username and password have been changed
but I'm pretty sure
On Thu, 29 May 2003, dodo wrote:
la débit a de nouveau chuté à 12-15 ko/s, même si j'ai beaucoup moins
d'erreurs CRC qu'au début.
May 29 13:34:00 Pentium4 pppoa3[2032]: CRC error in an AAL5 frame
May 29 13:35:04 Pentium4 pppoa3[2032]: CRC error in an AAL5 frame
May 29 13:36:01 Pentium4
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Ok Overbeek (mz) wrote:
Still hacking along, guys; I made a simple
pipe-version for the usb-read-part, but
that gave no difference.
In the meantime I found something else though:
I always get a CRC-error, when the amount of
data as read from the modem is abnormally
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Ok Overbeek (mz) wrote:
Don't look at the CRC-stuff; it could never interfere...
It is the size of the block I get (straight from the incoming
urb)!!
Ok. I've got an idea - no guarantees though.
Given the size of your reads, multiple frames are being sent over the
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, David Rosthorn wrote:
I've recently decided to switch to Red Hat 8.0, and I've been *attempting* to
install it, using the How-To file made by Benoit.
First, I took the alcaudsl.sys file from my WINNT\System\Drivers directory
I installed the drivers, and configured
On Fri, 21 Mar 2003, scott wrote:
snip
Give me the password for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip password
snip
asdl? or adsl?
If I were you I would get that password changed NOW. It is archived for
all posterity.
Regards,
Tim.
--
God said, div D = rho, div B = 0,
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Paul Hudson wrote:
Hi All,
Below is the tail of the /var/log/messages file after setting the vci and
vpi to the suggested for the UK,
and editing the pap-secrets and chap-secrets file. It looks pretty good to
me - but I'm no expert -
but still when I try any URL
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Enrique Dorantes wrote:
Hi, Í have the same problem, i got LCP timeout request, and I have USB Modem
running on Debian
But I can not patch the source code...
I save the mail as text and I run patch mail
and I get a lot of errors, and I try to modify the file
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Duncan Sands wrote:
As I understand it, you still need the -e 1 switch to pppoa3 but I don't
think you do do modem run.
Is there any reason not to make -e 1 the default?
None that I know of. When I originally wrote the patch I was guessing as
I didn't have a 330 to
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Edouard Gomez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You can find information there:
http://ed.gomez.free.fr/speetouch-info/
Of course it is:
http://ed.gomez.free.fr/speedtouch-info/
Cool. Thanks. Downloading it now.
Regards,
Tim.
--
God said, div D
On 17 Feb 2003, Peter Riocreux wrote:
DS == Duncan Sands [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, being able to include the pppd code into the microcode so
that the modem presents standard IP packets to the device driver
would be nice and shouldn't be too difficult to achieve.
DS Yes,
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Duncan Sands wrote:
snip
I think you mean 0xec. Maybe if we had the specs we would know. For me,
the worst bit about only a few people having access to the specs is that it excludes
everyone else who would like to do something with the modem or the drivers. For
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Duncan Sands wrote:
I can see three possibilities:
(1) they refuse to release the specs
(2) they release the specs to a limited group of developers
(3) they release the specs publically.
Is (2) acceptable?
Not really. If it is the only option then it's better than 1
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Matthieu Foillard wrote:
Le Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:11, Matthieu Foillard a écrit :
I noticed that pppoa3 eats cpu time (about 4-5%) when i enable some
iptables rules and make my connection laggy (e.g. ping the second host in
my route is about 500 ms and is 55
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Matthieu Foillard wrote:
sorry but i just repost since nobody answers :
I think it is because nobody knows the answer :-(
Can you try one of the older versions - try going back to
pppoa3 v1.24 - you will need to then find my patch for the
330 to apply.
You can also try
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may still be a bit early to draw conclusions, but I connected my
SpeedTouch 330 modem to a newly purchased USB PCI-card (82C861 from vendor
OPTi Inc) in stead of the USB on the motherboard, which uses chipset VIA
VT6202. It makes some
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Tim Woodall wrote:
Dec 24 15:26:04 pcronald pppoa2[249]: CRC error in an AAL5 frame
Dec 24 15:27:06 pcronald last message repeated 7 times
Dec 24 15:27:52 pcronald last message repeated 34 times
Dec 24 15:29:19 pcronald last message repeated 318 times
Dec 24 15
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Tim Woodall wrote:
Dec 24 15:26:04 pcronald pppoa2[249]: CRC error in an AAL5 frame
I think there is a problem somewhere but I'm not sure where.
snip
The CRC errors are caused by the line
swbuff(fdusb,1
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Ronald Baljeu wrote:
I doubt its the driver itself per-se. Do you have any processor load
figures? Does the driver take a lot of time? I suspect a potential buggy
USB chipset that windows copes with better. What chipset have you got?
It's a D850MV board from Intel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Bruno wrote:
/Proc/bus/usb says:
T: Bus=02 Lev=00 Prnt=00 Port=00 Cnt=00 Dev#= 1 Spd=12 MxCh= 3
B: Alloc= 0/900 us ( 0%), #Int= 0, #Iso= 0
D: Ver= 1.10 Cls=09(hub ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 8 #Cfgs= 1
P: Vendor= ProdID= Rev= 0.00
S: Product=USB
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My /etc/rc.d/rc.local contains:
modprobe ppp_generic
modprobe ppp_synctty
modprobe n_hdlc
modem_run -e 1 -m -f /windows/D/Linux/adsl/alcaudsl.sys
pppd call adsl
Do you need the -e 1 on the pppoa3 line in peers/adsl? Someone posted here
that
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Tim,
Indeed it seems parameter -e 1 is not necessary for making a connection,
but for modem_run it is.
I give you the results of the contents of /proc/bus/ubs/devices before and
after modem_run is executed. Hope you find something in it.
On Sun, 1 Dec 2002, christine noot-huyghe wrote:
as non-root, but that opens no connection. And even then the connection
seems to be usable only once. When ending it with:
killall -9 ppp0a3
You don't want to do this. kill -9 is only for times when everything has
gone wrong and you are
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Tim!
Got things working thanks to the patched modem_run! Tried it on Mandrake
9.0 because I could not get SuSE8.1 installed correctly again.
I still have to sort out a few things but I guess the biggest hurdle has
been taken.
By the way:
#
# Copyright (c) 2002 Tim Woodall ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
#
# This program is licenced under the GNU licence.
# See LICENCE for more details
#
# $Id: downup.sh,v 1.3 2002/10/09 22:12:46 tim Exp $
#
#
PING_TIMEOUT=20
PPPD_TIMEOUT=240
)
From: Tim Woodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [speedtouch] Re: LCP timeout with speedtouch 330 redhat 7.2
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Aiman Albaharna wrote:
I made a post last week with the exact same problem. Except I was using
Mandrake 8.2
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Aiman Albaharna wrote:
I made a post last week with the exact same problem. Except I was using
Mandrake 8.2 with the Speedtouch 330 and OHCI not UHCI. But apart from
that, I get the same LCP timeout and sem-post event thing.
Tim Woodall [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned
doesn't work?.
I might give Mandrake 8.2 a try.
Regards,
Frans
Speedtouch 330 - needs to use a different endpoint alternate.
See my mail:
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 18:33:45 +0100 (BST)
From: Tim Woodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002, Francois Rogler wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 01:09:56PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hullo,
I'm running netbsd 1.6; have built user-ppp and copied the mgmt.o file
a-ok.
However, when I cd to speedtouch-1.1 and try make and make install I get
some
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Sam Griffiths-Jones wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
You haven't quite got enough logging here to be sure but it might be
the OAM cell at the end of a frame problem or a buffer overflow in
the frame.
Hi Tim
Thanks for this. I haven't actually
On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, Sam Griffiths-Jones wrote:
Hi all
I remember seeing something about this before, but the mail archive
seems to be having trouble -- I can't read messages older than a
couple of weeks.
Tim's successful fix of the speedtouch 330 thing has exposed the next
problem.
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Tim Woodall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I would suggest a -e endpoint alternate interface switch to pppoa3 and
modem run with the default left at 2
It would prefer extend pusb to tell us what
On 23 Oct 2002, Diye Wariebi wrote:
I tried using the normal SpeedTouch USB modem last night and it worked
fine first time. I had my connection up all night without much
problems. However the SpeedTouch 330 still had problem using the same
configuration files. Below is a link showing the
On 22 Oct 2002, Diye Wariebi wrote:
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 18:09, Tim Woodall wrote:
On 21 Oct 2002, Diye Wariebi wrote:
Below is my /etc/ppp/peers/adsl
snip
this is because BT does not require a password for authentication.
Someone else had this problem. Search
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Sam Griffiths-Jones wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Diye Wariebi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Oct 20 18:41:43 escapethenet pppd[9504]: pppd 2.4.1 started by root, uid 0
Oct 20 18:41:43 escapethenet pppd[9504]: Using interface ppp0
Oct 20 18:41:43
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
There are three posibilities I can see. 1. Windows is doing something
completely non-standard and pppd will need hacking to make it work.
2. There is a standard password. That is going to be difficult to extract
from the binary on your system
On 21 Oct 2002, Diye Wariebi wrote:
Resending after subscribing to list.
BTW
I am using a H 7.2 system
Hi list
I have been up all night and cannot resolve this problem. My ISP is
btbroadband and my modem is an alcatel speedtouch 330 USB.
Below is an extract from my log file.
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Mon, 21 Oct 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
There are three posibilities I can see. 1. Windows is doing something
completely non-standard and pppd will need hacking to make it work.
2. There is a standard password. That is going to be difficult
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Hello,
(I've confused myself :-(. These are comments on the patch from
r1.24 to r1.25 of pppoa3.c. I'll reply with my comments on your
suggested patch in another email. (I hadn't read your email
properly and assumed that the latest change in cvs was
On Sat, 19 Oct 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Hopefully this makes more sense.
Hello,
I merged the experimental patch for pppoe support in pppoa3. At the
moment the code is for linux only as i don't have *BSD box.
I would like people who needs or can use PPPoE to try this patch.
I
On Sun, 20 Oct 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
swaped in by the VM. Could you explain your point of view a bit more ?
All I meant is that someone in the future could use BUFFER_SIZE in an
expression and get a surprise because it isn't surrounded with ( ).
It's things like this that appear to work
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Sam Griffiths-Jones wrote:
Hello all
Proud new owner of speedtouch 330 and Zen ADSL connection (which
works fine in windows) seeks help with linux things.
modem_run works fine, pppd seems to timeout and I never get an IP in
ifconfig ppp0.
Very grateful for
other special
cases that haven't been found yet :-)
Note that without this patch, if your ISP sends OAM cells that are the
only or last thing in a frame then you _will_ get a core dump.
Regards,
Tim.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
OK. To the CVS authors, here is a patch:
First two
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Paolo 'Garrone' Prandoni wrote:
Hi all
reading the docs attached to Speedtouch sw, I read that there are 2 method
to encapsulate/decapsulate PPP packets in/from AAL5. One is VCMUX and the
ather is LLC.
My ISP (Elitel.biz) is using VCMUX. Can this be a problem? The
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Richard Thompson wrote:
Now I have managed to completely piss off the moderators (sorry :-( )
lets try again
Hi all,
snip
You don't say what isn't working. Everything looks fine to me.
Turn off logging if you don't want the noise in your logfiles.
Regards,
Tim.
--
replying
to got the IP address 203.41.169.130 from your ISP. I would guess that
you configured an address like 10.0.0.1.
Regards,
Tim.
Michael
- Original Message -
From: Tim Woodall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:50 PM
Subject
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Alex Bennee wrote:
Jim Morrison [Mailinglists] said:
Hello guys..
Does anyone know if it's possible to get two 500k BT ADSL lines running
in multilink? By which I mean, appearing as 1x 1Mb:DownStream and
500k:UpStream line? (Through a linux box of course ;)
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Paolo 'Garrone' Prandoni wrote:
Hi all
reading the docs attached to Speedtouch sw, I read that there are 2 method
to encapsulate/decapsulate PPP packets in/from AAL5. One is VCMUX and the
ather is LLC.
My ISP (Elitel.biz) is using VCMUX. Can this be a problem? The
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Paolo 'Garrone' Prandoni wrote:
Hi all
reading the docs attached to Speedtouch sw, I read that there are 2 method
to encapsulate/decapsulate PPP packets in/from AAL5. One is VCMUX and the
ather is LLC.
My ISP
Opinions?
Possibly move it into atm_calc_hec so that we can verify these crc's as well?
Add in code to check the vpi/vci?
static struct { int last_vpi, last_vci; } crc[16];
perhaps so that we remember the last crc for this vpi/vci pair with this
pti and clp?
Might want to expand the array to
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Paolo 'Garrone' Prandoni wrote:
Hi all
following on my trouble with ADSL connection I report here last progress.
I manage to correct atm.c and pppoa3.c with Tim suggestions and the AAL5
problem is gone.
But unfortunatelly the connection is still not working.
I suspect
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Paolo 'Garrone' Prandoni wrote:
Hi all,
following suggestion from a friend of mine more expert in Linux staff than
me (unfortunatelly he hasn't a ADSL connection) I would focus your
attention on the following log lines
Yup. Thanks :-)
Sep 17 13:14:52 PC-GARRO
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Paolo 'Garrone' Prandoni wrote:
Hi all,
following suggestion from a friend of mine more expert in Linux staff than
me (unfortunatelly he hasn't a ADSL connection) I would focus your
attention on the following log lines
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
Sorry for all these emails. I am supposed to be at work and working and I
don't think this counts :-)
Bug is in aal5_frame_from_atm_cells in atm.c
There needs to be a pti=0; before each of the continue lines.
I think it is just one
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Lot of interesting stuff
Thanks !
Could people with simular problem test this and give feedback so i'll
put it into the FAQ ?
:-(
Initially:
MIN_GNT MAX_LAT LATENCY
00:00.0
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Mark Ty wrote:
Ultra Newbie Question, When the How-To says to:
Options to allow usb support :
M/* Support for USB (CONFIG_USB)
* Preliminary USB device filesystem (CONFIG_USB_DEVICEFS)
M UHCI (Intel PIIX4, VIA, ...) support (CONFIG_USB_UHCI)
M UHCI
On 28 Aug 2002, alex wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 17:11, Lee Bohan wrote:
Can you post what your ppp peer file config so we can look at it?
Here it is:
noauth
Where did this come from, it turns off authentication (see pppd man
page). You should get rid of this.
I think
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Alex Bennee wrote:
Tim Woodall said:
On 28 Aug 2002, alex wrote:
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 17:11, Lee Bohan wrote:
Can you post what your ppp peer file config so we can look at it?
Here it is:
noauth
Where did this come from, it turns off authentication (see
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Lee Bohan wrote:
Mmm, my reading of peer was the user but later on in the authup script
section it seems to imply the remote end. I don't have noauth in my peers
file and It Works For Me Also (TM) :-)
I suspect it is the missing hg* as you stated.
Probably.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, David Hedley wrote:
I have tested the watchdog patch and the one from Duncan Sands.
Neither make any difference to my connection problems - neither better
nor worse.
Interestingly however, on my system the watchdog timer never seems to
be tripped so I need to look more
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, v wrote:
My friend has got suse 8 and a speedtouch modem from alcatel,
He has installed everything and configured it, everything was working but
decided to reinstall after reinstall,
the following happens:
after i've added the next lines to the
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Matthew Pocock wrote:
Hi.
I use a speedtouch adsl modem, BT broadband and redhat 7.3, and have
been trying your drivers. I have read the howto and been on a couple of
chat rooms trying to get things going. However, I'm still having problems.
snip
On the occasions
On 4 Jul 2002, Tom Stockton wrote:
For those that are interested a colleague of mine has developed a
bootable cd distribution with all the speedtouch usb stuff built in.
Just insert cd boot comp, load modules / microcode , call pppd and
bosh! You've got a working router. Its currently
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, David Hedley wrote:
I have been extensively testing the Speedtouch USB modem under
FreeBSD (currently 4.4, will be testing 4.6 soon) with the latest
(161.5R) alcaudsl.sys from Alcatel and the 1.1 drivers from this
site.
I have noticed the following problems:
snip
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Hello,
This lkml post talks about a bug which makes a ppp queue waits
forever, this looks like our ppp is alive but i get no traffic
bug. So i would like somebody investigate
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Hello,
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 02:28:50 +0200
Oh for the student life ;-)
(Had you just got up or not gone to bed yet?)
This lkml post talks about a bug which makes a ppp queue waits
forever, this looks like our ppp is alive but i get
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Hello,
This lkml post talks about a bug which makes a ppp queue waits
forever, this looks like our ppp is alive but i get no traffic
bug. So i would like somebody investigate this because i cannot
reproduce the bug myself.
On 29 May 2002, alex wrote:
I've added a few more FAQ entries and tidied up a few other bits. I'm
attaching it here so:
a) people can let me know if anything is out of date/unclear
b) it might show up in a few search engines by being archived in the
mailing list
Cheers,
4.9 My
On 23 May 2002, alex wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for people who have download problems where they can't
download certain files or from certain sites. I've never been able to
reproduce the problem and it does seem apparent that different people
running the same code can get different
CVS people.
This has been up and running for me since the 11th without any hitches
or disconnections.
Can you apply before the release goes out. (It is a bug fix)
Regards,
Tim.
(Probably be a offset of about 2 - I can regenerate with exact lines
if you wish)
Index: src/pppoa3.c
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Alex Bennee wrote:
Tim Woodall said:
CVS people.
Do you want CVS access? Its not that hard to do, after all they gave it to
me :-)
I'm not really that bothered. I tend to work on this stuff when I have time
and then ignore it again for weeks. I'm also not a great
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Laurent Hoareau wrote:
Tim Woodall wrote:
RH7.3 = kernel 2.4.18 = problems for some.
Upgrade the kernel or downgrade and patch n_hdlc (or use async)
Dear Tim,
perhaps I'm wrong, but since 2.4.18, the kernel was already patched
(n_hdlc), no?
You are right. My
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Peter Bradbury wrote:
Ive installed Red Hat 7.3 which I believe has USB 2 (UHCI) support, PPP and HDLC
support, therefore I think I am correct I don't need to recompile the kernel.
Your lines are too long so I can't be bothered to read the rest but
I am told - (I
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Greg MATTHEWS wrote:
yes.. this is because pppoa3 forks so the process that is actually left
running has a different (higher) PID than the original process that was
started when you brought the adsl line up and therefore the file in /var/run.
i dont know if this
On 9 May 2002, alex wrote:
I've been in discussion with Alcatel about getting a license to
distribute the microcode with the drivers. They have been helpful so far
and have a draft License currently being looked over by their lawyers.
At the moment the license is along the lines of
I have tested this now and it seems to be ok and ought to fix the obvious bug.
Regards,
Tim.
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Duncan Sands wrote:
I've noticed some problems with async mode: occasional network
failures (reproducible) that disappear without
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Vladimir Vyskocil wrote:
Hi,
I'm investigating the lock out I have on my board with a USB Controller: Intel Corp.
82371SB PIIX3 USB [Natoma/Triton II] (rev 1).
I have found that pppoa2 (I don't tried with pppoa3 for now) from
speedtouch-CVS_03_03_2002 package block
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Hamish Marson wrote:
Hi all...
I still have a series of network 'black holes' with the speedtouch
drivers... They all appear to co-incide with pppoa3 logging CRC errors
in AAL5 frames (As far as I can tell anyway).
I've seen one or two other posts about this. I'm
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Hamish Marson wrote:
Tim Woodall wrote:
Once you have hit one of these black holes does anything work? i.e. can you
ping other sites or do you have to kill pppd and restart it?
Oh yeah. Everything else works fine. I can download other files right along side
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Alex Bennee wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
Been looking at the rp-pppoe code. It was the async stuff I was
thinking of.
Tim,
Is the rp-pppoe code easily hackable into a pppoe that works the same way
as pppoa?
I know some people in the US
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Hi,
I'll take a look at the code this week end and will try to merge
both sync and async stuff using a switch and function pointers.
If you can do that before i hack it myself, it would be great :-)
I think it is easier that that :-)
1.
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Hi,
I'll take a look at the code this week end and will try to merge
both sync and async stuff using a switch and function pointers.
If you can do that before i hack it myself, it would be great :-)
Untested - done in my lunchbreak at work.
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Edouard Gomez wrote:
Tha bad news, it doesn't work (for me).
The good news, the patch is now in CVS so Alex, you and I can try to see
what's wrong without submitting big patches for small fixes.
I'll take a look at the rp-pppoe tty code to see how they configure
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
OK. tested and works with the extra if(syncHDLC) added back in
in both async and sync modes :-)
p.s. I forgot. I have had to back out your Makefile change.
[tim@pauli /home/tim/cvs/speedtouch]$ make -v
GNU
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, tanaka wrote:
j'ai un probleme, je recois tous les messages en doubles ?
Do you mean with this patch? or just in general?
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
OK. tested and works with the extra if(syncHDLC) added back in
in both async and sync modes
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, tanaka wrote:
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, tanaka wrote:
j'ai un probleme, je recois tous les messages en doubles ?
Do you mean with this patch? or just in general?
in general, with this mailing list
It's odd. I'm not.
An occasional doubled up message isn't
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Alex Bennee wrote:
Tim Woodall said:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
The hdlc conversion will
double the size of the packet for 0xff which will (presumably) be done
by the kernel. Perhaps if I put the hdlc conversion code in pppoa3 it
might help?
Are you
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Alex Bennee wrote:
Tim Woodall said:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
The hdlc conversion will
double the size of the packet for 0xff which will (presumably) be done
by the kernel. Perhaps if I put the hdlc
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
Been looking at the rp-pppoe code. It was the async stuff I was thinking of.
Interestingly, in the rp-pppoe code, one of the suggestions it makes for
slow machines is to use async instead of sync. So I might
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
Here is the command I am using to get a particular file: (wrapped)
wget -m --passive-ftp -T 15 -w 3 ftp://ftp:tim.locofungus.org;
ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates
/7.2/en
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Alex Bennee wrote:
Hamish Marson said:
Also my uptime is woeful. Usually only 2-3 weeks
before the modem falls over won't respond any more...
2-3 weeks! Your doing quite well. Does modem_run fall over or just exit.
Once its been run you can't run it again without
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Tim Woodall wrote:
Here is the command I am using to get a particular file: (wrapped)
wget -m --passive-ftp -T 15 -w 3 ftp://ftp:tim.locofungus.org;
ftp.mirror.ac.uk/sites/ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/updates
/7.2/en/os/i386/php-manual-4.0.6-12.i386.rpm
snip
I
On 23 Mar 2002, alex wrote:
On Sun, 2002-03-17 at 11:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wouldnt it also be a good idea to publish md5 sums or gnupg sigs for the
software here: http://speedtouch.sourceforge.net/download.php ?
I've added the following to the the FAQ. We seem to have at
On 21 Mar 2002, alex wrote:
After upgrading my gateway to latest cooker (destroying my uptime so I
can test the RPM's :-) I had to re-do my firewall to be iptables based.
We knocked it about a bit on IRC and this is its current status:
It works(ish) by doing the following
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
