On 31 Oct 2007 at 11:37, James Dennett wrote:
> Bernie Cosell wrote:
> > I guess you've never used a [good] GUI-driven DB
> manager/administration
> > pgm.
>
> Your guess (luckily for me) is very wrong. It's just that I call these
> GUIs, not "
On 30 Oct 2007 at 23:31, Kees Nuyt wrote:
> [Default] On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:57:55 -0400, "Bernie Cosell"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I'm trying to correct several little problems in a DB I have and I've
> >now tried three [maybe four]
On 30 Oct 2007 at 14:05, James Dennett wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bernie Cosell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I'm trying to correct several little problems in a DB I have and I've
> > now tried three [maybe four] freeware DB managers
ded to do
*anything* in terms of managing/editing/etc a MySQL database that
required that I fire up the command line interface.
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
ing to correct typos in a DB that I recently converted to version 3]
Thanks!
/bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pearisburg, VA
--> Too many people, too few sheep <--
---
that with that and
then use an sqlite3 command line tool to import it. ???
Thanks! /bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pearisburg, VA
-->
On 2 Jul 2006 at 3:04, Nemanja Corlija wrote:
> On 7/1/06, Bernie Cosell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What's the current state of GUI-based managers for SQLite? I know there
> > have been various admin apps for SQLite, but I've been out of touch and I
>
What's the current state of GUI-based managers for SQLite? I know there
have been various admin apps for SQLite, but I've been out of touch and I
didn't see any linked out of the sqlite.org web page.
Thanks!
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fiber
On 26 Jun 2006 at 14:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "Bernie Cosell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll confess that I am an old-fashioned "hardcopy" kind of guy... are the
> > sqlite3 docs available in any sort of reasonably-printabl
I'll confess that I am an old-fashioned "hardcopy" kind of guy... are the
sqlite3 docs available in any sort of reasonably-printable format?
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pearisburg, VA
--> Too many people, too few sheep <--
On 21 Mar 2005 at 9:34, Ara.T.Howard wrote:
> this is not always true - on nfs for example. the only atomic ops on nfs are
> mkdir and symlink.
And flock if the filesystem supports it [as ReiserFS does].
/bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:
e whose OSs aren't so draconian.
I don't understand -- why is whatever algorithm a program uses for
generating a private temporary file a "penalty" no matter how the file
name works out? Even "sqlite001", "sqlite002"...etc' would suffice for
all I c
gine, itself, should *NOT* be larded up with all
of that kind of stuff: keep it lean and mean. But *do* avoid orphaning
our old data...
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pearisburg, VA
--> Too many people, too few sheep <--
t useable for something like
sqlite, where, indeed, flock *IS* broken for the default/near universal
FS, and so SQLite could hardly depend on it working.
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pearisburg, VA
On 2 Dec 2003 at 11:19, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> On 1 Dec 2003, at 18:49, Bernie Cosell wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to set from Perl for SQLite to wait instead of die when
> > it
> > finds the database locked?
> >
> > We've been getting a few:
>
seconds would do the job for me, but I'm not sure
if/how that might be doable from DBD::SQLite in Perl.
Thanks!
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pearisburg, VA
-->
nd my original offer: if you believe you're getting two
copies of postings to the list, forward me the headers [all of them] for
two "matching" messages you received and I'll be happy to try to help
sort out what's going on...
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell
em] from the two copies you
received? Rather than bothering the entire list, you can just email them
to me privately, if you'd prefer, and if there's something of list-
interest in the resolution I'll email back the conclusion.
/Bernie\
--
Bernie Cosell
On 20 Oct 2003 at 17:52, Bert Verhees wrote:
> Bernie Cosell wrote:
> >As I said, it is a *LONGSTANDING* debate that has been discussed for
> >*YEARS* (decades!) off and on, here and there. And as I said, the
> >general way it works out is that newcomers to the Internet us
> Bernie Cosell wrote:
>
> >Note two things: first the verbiage about the 'teleconferencing' stuff
> >has been removed [NB: I don't believe this is just an oversight, but
> >rather because of a general feeling that "reply-to-list" is not such a
and elsewhere]. Second, in
the use of reply-to the operative verb is "suggests", which clearly
implies that mail clients that permit reply-addressing options *beyond*
just "send it where the reply-to says"
lients, it is easiier to make a *choice* [for
those of us who do make such choices] if the list is reply-to-sender. For most
[but not all!] mail clients, it is VERY much harder [near impossible for some
if you don't type in the address brute-force by hand into the reply!] to
ore-experienced net-folk prefer reply-to-
author, newer-net-folk seem to lean toward reply-to-list [not absolute either
way of course, just the general tendency].
I'm solidly in the reply-to-author camp. More here:
<http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html>
/Bernie\
--
Be
23 matches
Mail list logo
