Yes, the functionality is there. But it actually
caused some problems on the Struts side and I think I
need to roll back StrutsValidator.java to use booleans
again. With it returning the actual value, you can't
indicate that it should still continue with other
validations if you would want it to
til after the Struts 1.1 release. I'll think if
there are any other ways to do this and keep it
backwards compatible.
David
--- James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 03:57 PM 7/15/2002, David Winterfeldt wrote:
> >The Validator was designed to work this way so
> there
The Validator was designed to work this way so there
could different groupings of validation rules.
Because some times it may not make sense to continue
with certain validations until the form is in a
certain state. The depends attribute in the pluggable
validator definitions is what controls th
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I added the documentation/comments for the new
> validator DTDs, but have
> a question:
>
> Do we really want two DTDs?
>
> Orginally, there was just one configuration file,
> but we saw it would be
> convenient to have a master rules file and one or
cool.
--- Arron Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 'nameList.value' is being used to lookup of
> the
> > messages/errors that were stored under this in the
> > ActionMessages. ActionMessages has an internal
> Map
> > and uses a key (normally the property name and
> there
> > is also GLOBAL
me bean as the
> text fields. To read the markup, the messages and
> errors would then be
> calling on the same property. Internally the name is
> being set to the
> same as the rest of the tags, is this simply being
> ignored to go fetch
> the messages on a standard name
I'm not 100% I'm sure I'm following what the problem
is (probably missed some other e-mails). I was going
to talk to you Aaron when I went to do these, but it
seemed very simple so I went ahead and made them. I
just wanted the nested messages and errors tags to be
able to get the property name o
The latest nightly builds let you get a Map of any
objects (except booleans) returned from a validation
method. The latest configuration of the Validator xml
rules (conf/share/validator-rules.xml) calls some
methods that return the correctly typed object
(primitives, date, and credit card). So o
This has not been changed. Some features have been
added, but I was trying not to make any major changes
since there needs to be a Commons Validator release to
correspond with a Struts 1.1 release.
David
--- Dave J Dandeneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that the validator (pre 1.1)
The page attriubte for a field element is optional.
David
--- Jing Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When looking into the validator codes, the page no.
> of a wizard
> like application is needed for validator to work. It
> looks to me
> that the validator will validate the current page
> plus a
--- Jing Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to normalize hundreds of screen objects
> in
> a struts related tool, so when the validator page
> number
> came into the picture, I feel I am not fully
> understand its
> implications from the perspective of business
> scenarios.
>
> Basi
The Struts Validator was recently moved (right before
beta 1) from contrib/validator to the main source
tree. I don't know why the build isn't working for
you. Those classes are in cvs. Maybe your checkout
failed? The ValidatorPlugIn is in the
org.apache.struts.validator package (along with
Va
I checked in the changes in Commons Validator and
Struts to use Jakarta ORO.
David
--- David Winterfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm planning on switching this over tonight. I'm
> ready to check in the changes to Commons Validator.
> The unit test I made shows
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Struts-dev Newsgroup wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 21:10:01 -0800
> > From: Struts-dev Newsgroup
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
oad than ORO!
>
> I don't think we should allow the user to choose. It
> would be confusing to
> the user, and also to us when trying to track down
> problems and subtle
> differences in behaviour.
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> - Original Message -
even if it works, this is quite likely
> over-engineering for this
> situation...
>
> --
> Martin Cooper
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Winterfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Struts Developers List"
> <[EMAIL PROTECT
least on the xml
side.
David
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, David Winterfeldt wrote:
>
> > Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 11:44:43 -0800 (PST)
> > From: David Winterfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To:
It looks like when you made changes to the PlugIn
Craig that it broke the ValidatorPlugIn. Having
multiple set-property elements under the plug-in used
to work, but now it looks like only the last one is
being kept. It looks like the addition of
PlugInSetPropertyRule in ConfigRuleSet broke this.
I'm reposting this. It might be easily missed since I
forwarded the bug for this that I filed.
Email Validation doesn't allow '-' in address. This
is an error in the Jakarta Regexp package. It also
has trouble with large max values.
ex: ^\d{2,1000}$
Does anyone think we should just switch
Email Validation doesn't allow '-' in address. This
is an error in the Jakarta Regexp package. It also
has trouble with large max values.
ex: ^\d{2,1000}$
Does anyone think we should just switch to ORO? I'm
leaning that way, but I used Jakarta Regexp because it
was considered 'lighter'. If
On this same note, I forgot to copy the Jakarta Regexp
jar to the dist/lib directory and into the validator
example webapp. I'll file bugs for things like this
and fix them.
David
--- "Couball, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think the gump build failed because the
> jakarta-struts.xml pr
The Struts Validator has been moved from
contrib/validator to the Struts core. Also the last
references to Struts related code from the Commons
Validator has been removed. So to get this error you
are probably using a newer Commons Validator with an
old Struts Validator version. The new config
d
--- Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> David Winterfeldt wrote:
>
> > v1.3 of
> >
>
src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/html/NestedFormTag.java
> > won't compile for me.
> > David
>
>
> I bet you are using Tom
I have all the main code I wanted to do checked in
except for documentation, but you said that was ok to
get in later Martin. I'll file bugs for any other
things I know that are issues. So you can tag
whenever Craig says it is ok. I changed on thing in
the Commons Validator tonight in case you
>
> > Subject: Re: NestedFormTag in cvs head
> >
> > It fails to compile here consistently?...
> >
> > Compiles fine for me. The NestedIterate does the
> same thing with its
> > super.doAfterBody() method use also, it's a
> surprise that it would only
>
v1.3 of
src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/nested/html/NestedFormTag.java
won't compile for me.
[javac] symbol : method doAfterBody ()
[javac] location: class
org.apache.struts.taglib.html.FormTag
[javac] int temp = super.doAfterBody();
Anyone else having this problem?
David
There are comments in the build.properties.sample file
indicating which version of any jars to use. If we
are out of sync at all, this is an easy place to
update. And the binary download of Struts has these
jars in the lib directory which were used when
compiling the Struts binary.
David
--- "
+1
But could we wait until at least tonight or tomorrow
to retag and lock down. If that is OK with everyone.
I have the Validator example webapp incorporated into
Struts, but I need to add a couple of things to it.
Although I could check it in as is depending on how
soon you want to get the be
g
> org.apache.struts.validator instead of
> org.apache.struts.action for the
> five main classes.
>
> I will update the nightly builds to include
> jakarta-regexp (which we'll
> also need to ship in the "lib" directory), and tell
> Gump about it as well,
> once
I'm going to check this in later tonight if there are
no objections to the packages I've placed things
under. I'll add the webapp example and documentation
next. The Jakarta Regexp jar will need to get added
to the properties file for the nightly builds.
added to org.apache.struts.action
(Vali
This may be a bit late since we are in beta, but I
have some time to work on this now. If everyone else
thinks this is worth adding, we can do so.
Here is a list of things I would like to get in for
1.1.
1. Clean up any javadoc comments and package.html.
2. Enhance documentation
3. Deprecate Va
Vote: Struts 1.1b1 Release Plan
[x] +1 I am in favor of the release, and will help
support it
[ ] +0 I am in favor of the release, but am unable
to help support it
[ ] -0 I am not in favor of the release
[ ] -1 I am against this proposal (must include a
reason).
I closed out bug 6685 last night.
David
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FYI, I have cleaned up all the outstanding bug
> reports for Commons
> components that the HEAD branch of Struts relies on
> except for:
>
> 3893 - Digester - Enhancement to handling for
> body
Your property isn't really 'blah'. It is 'blah[0]',
'blah[1]', etc. So if you use the full property for a
field for the ActionErrors key, then you can retrieve
it next to each field.
ActionErrors errors = new ActionErrors();
errors.add("blah[0]", new ActionError("error.msg"));
This type of
Log4J recently added some new classes. I would check
that you have a version of Log4J and Commons Logging
from the same time. I had some trouble too until I
went and downloaded the latest version of each.
David
--- Chris Hane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to get a Struts 1.0 appli
I have no problems with moving what's left of the
Validator to src/share. My top goal right now is to
go over all the javadoc comments for the Commons
Validator and Struts Validator and work on
documentation. Then to apply any bug fixes that
people have sent me e-mails about that I haven't
gotte
I wasn't sure if it was good to encourage someone
using another classes logger because it might make the
logs harder to read and control. So I didn't add
access for the logger. And you do still have access
to the servlet log.
I agree with Craig. I think it is good form to define
your own logge
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, David Winterfeldt wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 19:49:05 -0800 (PST)
> > From: David Winterfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List
I checked in what I've done so far. Commons Logging
issues.
1. Do we want to just add console logging to the
example web apps or log to a file? Are you still
running the nightly build Craig? Log4J would need to
be added to the properties file so it can be included
in the webapps for the binary
I can help over the weekend with switching to Commons
Logging since I suggested it. Unless someone else
really wants to. :)
I assume most things will become LOG.debug unless they
are obviously referring to an error.
I see that the Digester class does the following.
I've been doing the latter
I may have missed this discussion, but was there ever
talk about switching to Commons Logging for the Struts
1.1 release. I've been using Commons Logging with
log4j and I've had no problems. I think everyone
would appreciate the improved logging control.
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the Commons Validator jar in your WEB-INF/lib
directory? I need to get it setup in commons so it is
building with everything else, but I did leave a
binary of it in the lib directory of the download from
my site.
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I'm trying to update an a
t; Commons-Validator, Tiles, Velocity and whatever else
> with Struts, and
> I'll help write it, but I'm thinking the code level
> interfaces really
> belong with the components, and not so much with the
> framework(s).
>
> -Ted.
>
>
> David Winterfeldt wrot
I think this got lost in the DynaBean discussion so
I'm resending it.
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should also consider whether it makes sense to
> integrate the
> configuration of the validation criteria into
> struts-config.xml -- not as
> a *replacement* for the e
I think it would be nice if the service manager was
moved to proper. I was going to use it and move away
from the ValidatorServlet, but I needed to use the
Tiles extension of ActionServlet so I left the
Validator loading alone. If the service manager was
built in, then this wouldn't have been ne
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not yet ... we'll need to look at how to integrate
> valiation support together with it.
The Validator uses BeanUtils for all property calls to
retrieve values to validate. And BeanUtils works with
DynaBeans now, right?
ex: value = Prope
+1
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arron has developed an interesting and popular
> extension to the Struts
> taglibs. He has been distributing the extension in a
> very complete and
> accessible package, and has offered to donate it to
> Struts. Arron has
> also been helping o
I just wanted to comment that I did look at it a
little, run the examples, and look at the source. It
seems nice, clean, and easy to use. I haven't used it
in a project yet though.
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arron,
>
> Once Craig's implementation of the multi-servlet
>
I like literal out of the three listed. A static or
staticText field would be the only other ideas I have
for naming.
David
--- Oleg V Alexeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Ted,
>
> So, votes for naming of free style attribute for
> html tags -
>
> literal - 2
> freetext - 1.5 (already
Alan and I already talked offline, but I told him this
might be a good place to get other opinions. I think
that all validation errors are fatal. If it isn't
fatal it is really a message, so you could use
ActionMessages instead of ActionErrors. The
equivalents of all the error methods could be
I think Ted was just saying that the core of Struts
should remain small and that there can be lots of
add-ons and extensions for "plug and play"
functionality. It makes the core easier to manage and
then people can add in whatever functionality they
need by just dropping in a jar and/or tld. It
--- "Sobkowski, Andrej" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ted,
>
> thanks for your answer.
>
> I understand your idea of "initial validation". And
> I also agree with
> "Generally, objects should have dominion over their
> own data". But in the
> case of the validation process, IMHO the bean is the
I don't mind the idea of combining or changing the XML
configuration for validations. I think that the
validation rules are getting very long at the top of
the Validator and need to be moved to a separate file
(at least for the default ones).
I have some comments interspersed below on some other
I believe the nightly build is still running on a
server that Craig is maintaining. I thought it would
be a good idea (and have had a couple of requests) to
have the validtor jar built during the nightly builds.
I have everything ready to do this (not checked in),
but the jakarta regexp
(http://
Ted,
I just wanted to mention that any of the resource
links to http://husted.com/about/struts are bad since
everything was moved to http://husted.com/struts, but
even if you take out the about from the url it still
does't go to the resource.
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/resources
The validator:errors tag header and footer are
optional. So you can do something like this below.
or
Also in the nightly builds there is an html:messages
tag that works like validator:erro
+1
Sounds like a good way to give more visibility to all
the bugs.
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Originally, I think we did that just to leverage
> bugilla's automatic
> mail feature. Posting them to DEV and leaving them
> unassigned would seem
> to be a better fit with the
The string you pass into ActionError must be a key
from your message resource property file. Otherwise
the property for error messages is just a key to look
up messages and the convention is to make it match the
property name.
errors.add ("bar.foo[3].xyz",
new ActionErrorError ("error.requ
The static JavaScript works in the example I made, but
when I tried to combine the static reference along
with the generated code it wouldn't work.
would generate
blah, blah, blah
Is this what you got working? I didn't specify the
type attribute, but I'm not sure why they didn't wor
from the existing JSPs.
> >
> >Ravi
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: David Winterfeldt
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 12:42 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: TODO 1.1 - Tools - ActionForm Cod
://www.husted.com/about/struts/codemaker.htm
Struts Generator by David Winterfeldt - Based on the
generator.xml and a table/query an xml file is
generated. Based on the generated xml file a primary
key class, data bean class, jdbc class, and an
ActionForm (Struts) can be generated.
General link to other
I want to add the ability to have validation for
people that are using 'indexed="true"' on forms for
indexed properties. I'm thinking about this for the
validation.xml file. It would only handle a single
level of indexing. Does the 'indexed="true"' handle
more than one level? I don't think it
The main link for the digester on the
jakarta.apache.org/struts is 404ing.
http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/api/org/apache/struts/digester/package-summary.html
David
__
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief in
Are you going directly to the JSP page or are you
going through an action? I suspect you are going
through an action and you have 'validate="true"'.
This would cause the page to be validated before it
was actually submitted. So you could either go
directly to a JSP or have 'validate="false"' an
There is an html:messages tag that is basically the
same as html:errors except it iterates over messages
and errors so you can remove the html from the message
resources. There are the classes ActionMessages and
ActionMessage for general messages like "Record has
been deleted.". ActionErrors is
--- Cedric Dumoulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have checkout project on my local pc. I have do
> checkout again in a
> clean place, but error remain ;-(
> What is strange is that module import has worked
> without error.
>
> Cedric
>
> David Winterfel
Where do you have the project checked out from cvs? I
was getting this error message when I was trying to
work from the server. Craig said it sounded like the
cvs checkout was anonymous when I had this problem.
Once I did a checkout to my local pc, I could check
things in.
David
P.S. - If you
age name with org.apache.struts.codemaker
> > 3. Modifications in the validation.xml generation
> >
> > Please let me know,
> > Thanks,
> > Ravi
>
> David Winterfeldt wrote:
> > I started on something simple that autogenerates
> > primary key class,
d the header template with apache
> information
> > 2. Package name with org.apache.struts.codemaker
> > 3. Modifications in the validation.xml generation
> >
> > Please let me know,
> > Thanks,
> > Ravi
>
> David Winterfeldt wrote:
> > I started
> you a place to put special output methods for the
> presentation layer (or
> report layer, for that matter). Neither the Helper
> nor the DAO are
> linked to HTTP or a Web application.
>
>
> David Winterfeldt wrote:
>
> And, while we're at, spit out some basic DBMS code
> that implements the
> latest design patterns.
>
> David Winterfeldt wrote:
>
> > I started on something simple that autogenerates
> > primary key class, data bean class, jdbc class,
> and an
> > ActionF
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> steve wilkinson wrote:
> > I do have the source code available for download
> >
>
(http://www.newparticles.com/struts/downloads/index.html)
> and I will be
> > improving on the example by incorporating EJBs and
> a database. I'm
> > working with JBoss,
You're right, it does. I will fix it tonight. Thanks
for catching it.
David
--- "Deadman, Hal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I am not mistaken, the nightly 1.1 build contains
> a reference to
> com.wintecinc.struts instead of org.apache.struts.
>
> from struts-html.xml:
>
>
>
org.apache.s
I thought this was going to be a core feature (or is
it not ready for the core yet, Oleg?).
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe Oleg committed a package to contrib, and
> is looking for help
> with sample code, general testing and documentation
What is the status of having something to load a
service in Struts? If it is going to be a while, I
would suggest at least adding something that could at
least handle initialization of resources that would
fit in with the future plans. I was waiting for
something like this before I added the Val
I think it would be good if the initial order a
property/key that is added to
ActionMessages/ActionErrors is maintained, but I
wondered what others think. I think it is easier to
read the error messages on the web page if they match
the order of the fields on the page. I have some code
written t
+1
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I cc'd to this list, the 1.0 versions of the
> beanutils, collections,
> and digester packages have been released under the
> Commons project. Now
> that these are official 1.0 releases, I propose to
> modify the Struts 1.1
> environme
I use the Digester in this class. It loads the
validation.xml in web/example/WEB-INF.
com.wintecinc.struts.validation.ValidatorResourcesInitializer
I have it posted here.
http://home.earthlink.net/~dwinterfeldt
David
--- Rey Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Look at the mapper configurat
se I'm
not sure where it belongs. All the logic tags are
very generic. Maybe it belongs in a taglib/validator
package. If you read this Craig, maybe you could
comment.
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Winterfeldt wrote:
> > This would work, but woul
Maybe the token that can be generated in an action be
used or make a workflow token.
David
--- "Robbin L. Gratz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> With the "return stack" concept, I'm assuming this
> will be a session scope
> variable. What happens when the user clicks the
> back button rather
What your thinking of may already do this, but I
thought I would mention this in case it didn't. If
you end up contructing a workflow using the actions,
it would be nice if it could be defined as a linked
list (or at least kept track of the last action). So
you wouldn't just go forward, but coul
Sorry. I apologize. I got frustrated with the
problems I'm having and just wanted to get it checked
in. I've tried doing it on the server, with Cygwin,
and with WinCvs for a few days. I can't check
anything in on the server and if I commit more than a
few files Cygwin's cvs and WinCvs never se
This sounds good. I adding 'messages=true'. That
makes it easier to use than have to put in a long key
each time.
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Winterfeldt wrote:
> > This would work, but would it be confusing for a
> > general m
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> > Following this philosophy, we'd create a new tag
> (perhaps
> > ?) for the new functionality, and
> deprecate
> > . In addition, we'd need to change
> the 1.1 implementation of
> > so that it did something sensible,
>
. If we do replace the old tag, would it still be
somewhere for people to access the old tag that
migrate from Struts 1.0 to Struts 1.1? Possibly
called html:errorsOld or old-html:errors. Or the new
one could be html:errorsIterator.
David
>
> David Winterfeldt wrote:
> >
> > I st
Thanks.
--- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, David Winterfeldt wrote:
>
> > I started to check everything into a validator
> > directory under contrib. It looks like I
> successfully
> > added directo
I still seem to be having some trouble, but I'll keep
trying. The other errors I was getting were from the
cvs checkout I did on the server in my home directory.
I'll try doing it again, but explicitly login to
cvs as Craig suggested in another e-mail. I managed
to get these files checked in
validator)
cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed
cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
The status shows it checked in locally, but not into
the main repository.
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure, if that works for you. It's just that it might
> be simpli
I have couple of issues with the best way to handle
the possible incorporation of the validator custom JSP
tags into Struts. I'll go through each of the issues.
I made two custom jsp tags for errors based off of the
Struts' tags. One was validator:errors which is the
equivalent of html:errors e
Do you want everything checked in as is for now
(package names, jsp tags, etc.)?
David
--- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just added a contrib directory to the main
> repository. This would be
> a good place to upload the working copies of the
> packages we are
> working on, includ
Oleg,
What is the status of your work on this?
David
--- Oleg V Alexeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Ted,
>
> Friday, June 29, 2001, 2:33:29 PM, you wrote:
>
> TH> If there is no other way ;-(
>
> TH> We just need to think about what happens if
> someone wants to use the
> TH> Bean
on
> offering a nice solution in order to preserve the
> real look of a reg. exp.
> in an XML file?
> Fr.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: David Winterfeldt
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 25 June 2001 18:11
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: server
Regular expressions should be:
^"\(?(\d{3})\)?[-| ]?(\d{3})[-| ]?(\d{4})$"
Properties file version
^\"\\(?(\\d{3})\\)?[-| ]?(\\d{3})[-| ]?(\\d{4})\"$
David
--- David Winterfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you are doing regular expressions you can
> b
When you are doing regular expressions you can
basically just cut and paste them from an example and
escape out the few XML sensitive characters, but you
have to escape out the escape characters in a java
properties file which I think makes something that is
already hard to read even more unreadab
I'm intersted in seeing the code too. If my
validation framework does more, maybe we can make them
work in tandem.
I've actually been working on making the validation
framework work independant of Struts. A friend of
mine wants to be able to configure a different set of
rules just to run on a
Maybe I'm not doing that
> yet, but its where I'm trying to go :)
>
> Respectfully,
> Levi Cook
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Winterfeldt
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:17 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
I haven't had time yet to reorganize the code to
separate out validations into pure boolean validation
methods. The interface that is there now wasn't the
original one and has evolved over time. When I have
free time, I've normally focused on adding
functionality over reorganizing the source cod
I don't think there would be anything wrong with your
idea, but I think it is a little more flexible keeping
the validation separate from the ActionForm. I
started working on a validation framework, but I put
the info in an xml file. I would rather change a
value in an xml file than having to re
have built a filter to change what
> they entered into the
> format
> > > which we work with (1,000.55 ) to validate it.
> This means ONE
> validation
> > > created for money, but a filter had to be
> created for users located in
> > > Brasil. The filter jus
> situation as needed, and one central validation
> package.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Winterfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 2:26 PM
> Subject: RE: Client/Server Side Validatio
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
