Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 11/16/07, Joe Laffey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did this issue occur ONLY with CARP ips? I have plugged my laptop directly
into the cable modem, removing the pfsense box completely, and I still see
the problem (but only on certain ips).
Yes and no. I kept test
RB wrote:
I'm having trouble getting virtual addresses to behave as I expect; my
expectations may be what's off, but I'll let you be the judge.
I have a pair of systems set up as a virtual router - CARP IP on both
WAN and LAN, and clients configured with that as their gateway. Try
as I may, I c
to share the same subnet (with routers on .1 and .2 for example),
but since they're from independent service providers, that isn't going to
happen.
Any suggestions gratefully appreciated (even if they're "it can't be done" - if
I know it can't be done, I won'
with
only 2 interfaces, i.e. LAN and WAN ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Chris
--
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited
For full contact details visit http://www.minotaur.it
This email is made from 100% recycled elec
Daniel Lloyd wrote:
Depends on how they redirect, could be stale DNS caches.
That would be my guess as well, but it depends on how the redirection is
done. There is no other caching unless you have a package, like squid
installed.
--
Paul M wrote:
two firewalls, fwa, fwb, fwa is the master and replicated to fwb
I made the mistake of modifying something on
fwb, and then of course had to go back and reproduce the changes on fwa.
Could there be added in the UI (advanced options maybe) a flag to
indicate that this FW is a slave
Atkins, Dwane P wrote:
We are confused as to which is the upgrade we need to do for the
latest firmware. Is it the Full-and-embedded update or is it just the
full update?
Where are you seeing a Full-and-embedded file? There shouldn't be any
of those around anymore for RC3, it's split in
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 11/20/07, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
two firewalls, fwa, fwb, fwa is the master and replicated to fwb
I made the mistake of modifying something on
fwb, and then of course had to go back and reproduce the changes on fwa.
Could there be added in the UI (advanced
> You cannot do this! And this is really a very very short answer of why
> it doesn't work.
> I don't think you're interested on internals of this just the quick answer.
Actually, I kind of am. I'd be very interested to know why it can't work, if
you don&#
Wade Blackwell wrote:
Good morning sports fans,
I am running PF 1.2-RC2. I have 22 IPsec tunnels running over a
low bandwidth connection. CPU usage is below 30% and spikes to 90%
when re-keying occurs. memory usage hovers around 25% The interesting
issue I have is this;
One of the directl
Leif Nilsson wrote:
Hi all!
I have a question what kind of speed you need for OpenVPN tunnels with
clients.
Total employees are on site A 15, site B 10 and site C 5, and approx.
15 employees on different locations with client access.
Most of the traffic will be http, mail, fileserver o
Markus Helfrich wrote:
Hello,
i've got a nice Problem. I installed a Pfsense wall on a Jetway Board
with two Gigabit Ethernet adapters from Realtek onboard.
If i plug the WAN Cabel in, the Link goes up und i have connect but ...
the CPU is 60% in use and i have terrible connect to the internet.
qoska kotfare wrote:
Try forcing the speed duplex since the card may fail to negotiate
properly with the switch
But not until you verify there's actually a problem as I described in my
last post, blindly forcing speed and duplex on any piece of equipment is
more likely to cause problems th
Leif Nilsson wrote:
Thanks for your answer!
Well the fileserver is domain server for all employees to log on to.
So I think that this will generate some load on the broadband.
To PfSense we will use 2Ghz with 2Gb RAM.
But as I said I'm not sure what kind of speed on the broadband I need.
O
JBosco wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I updated my 1.2RC3(built on Sat Nov 24 13:51:31 EST 2007) and
the IPSec VPN stopped working.
what version did you upgrade from? What order are the logs in, newest
on top or bottom? Can you paste more logs also?
---
Raleigh Guevarra wrote:
Hi there,
I have:
pfSense version 1.2-RC3
DNS Forwarder enabled
DNS Server disabled
Everything's running ok until I tried to disable the DNS Forwarder, I lost internet connection. I enabled it again and when I tried to ping a computer by hostname, it returned a diff
Wally Mono wrote:
Can anybody make any sense out of this? I got 8 of these while running
a yum update on a FC 5 xen partition. And (not coincidentally I
suspect) immediately afterward got a 3 day distributed dictionary
email attack (DHA?) that forced me to loopback a domain.
It's exceptional
Bill Marquette wrote:
You might look at the code a little closer. It happens on the first
day of the month at 2:01am. In fall the worst that would happen if it
happens to fall on the same day is the code will run twice. In
spring, we could potentially miss the run _if_ the time zone change
occ
Ron Rosson wrote:
Bye setting the time to check the bogons file at 2am this will prevent
the check from happening in the spring time and it will happen twice
in the fall.
For those wondering "wtf", daylight savings change. But only if the DST
change falls on the 1st calendar day of the month
Paul M wrote:
when I first started using pfsense with rc1, it was so unstable when
either configuring CARP or expecting CARP to failover that the machine
would crash or lockup and would nearly always lose the config.xml.
even RC2 when changing carp interfaces can still crash pfsense, and I
woul
Gabriel Green wrote:
Hi All,
I've heard much about these WRAP boards, which can store pfSense in
firmware. What I need to know is the following:
* We need something that can handle 51 IPSec tunnels (and up to a full
T1 of bandwidth, occasionally; usually much less) without any trouble
caus
Léo Goehrs wrote:
I Agree, and specially on FreeBSD. In fact, we have pretty complex
configurations with about 25 vlans per firewall and on top of these, we have
Carp Interfaces. We used to have FreeBSD but when manipulating the carp
interface, we would regularly face Kernel Panic.
As lon
Paul Brown wrote:
I'm also having problems with Port Forwarding - both regular and 1:1.
Firewall log shows the traffic passing but connection attempts just
timeout.
Is this a known issue?
No, nothing related to this has changed in a long time.
See
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Port_Forwa
Rainer Duffner wrote:
BTW: What kind of case do you recommend?
AFAICS, PCEngines doesn't really sell Mini-ITX-cases, which seem to be
the form-factor for the ALIX-boards.
They aren't mini ITX. Cases linked here:
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=155
PC Engines sells the same.
--
Linus Nordberg wrote:
Hi,
How are security issues in "upstream" software like the FreeBSD kernel
handled by the pfSense project?
As Bill said, we release point updates for any issues that affect the
system. Since this is a local-only issue, and if you have local access
on pfSense it's game
Wally Mono wrote:
Any clue as to what rule 66.423.11.0/0 means would be appreciated.
If you click on the pass or block image in the web log display it'll
show you exactly which rule caused the pass/drop.
Actually that is blank: 'The rule that triggered this action is:'
followed directly b
Mine is 12v 1250ma barrel connector and center hot.
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 17:21 -0600, Tim Nelson wrote:
> I just came upon a Nokia IP130 firewall unit but do not have the power
> supply. I know many people run monowall and pfsense on these units and was
> hoping one of you could tell me the vol
t unit?
>
> Tim Nelson
> Systems/Network Support
> Rockbochs Inc.
> (218)727-4332
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Patch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Sent: Saturday, December 8, 2007 11:38:59 PM (GMT-0600) America/Chicag
Russ Bennett wrote:
Hello,
I've setup a 1:1 nat and entered in the rules. Nothing was getting
through so I looked at the log and I can see the rule getting hit
properly except within the log I get the following message
The rule that triggered this action is:
@45 block drop in log quick all lab
Russ Bennett wrote:
I probably am over thinking this...I tend to do that often.
Any how, I believe I am having success
1. I created the VIP with the /29 block I was given.
2. I created the 1:1 208.83.93.19/32 -> 10.0.1.14/32
3. I created the firewall rule
Proto Source PortDestination
Is there a driver in 1.2-RC3-embedded for USB-Serial
converters? or a way to add it in?
-- this is on an ALIX.2C3 board built with
pfSense-1.2-RC3-Embedded.img -- so far everything else
is working great!
The converter does show up in the system.log as a
generic device, but I can't seem to talk to
Heinrich Pechtold wrote:
Hi!
we have some problems with Olicom Token Ring Hardware
Free Bsd supports this hardware with the oltr(4) driver.
Pfsense boots up, and shows the pci Tokenring Hardware while booting up
correctly, but also tell "no driver attachd" at the same time (same
Line).
Token
ile and build my own image, but I suppose I can if needed.
Thanks,
-Chris
On Dec 15, 2007, at 10:47 AM, sean nash wrote:
Does this mean Serial to usb as in Vodaphone pcmcia crds?
On Dec 13, 2007 8:43 PM, Chris Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a driver in 1.2-RC3-embedded for USB-Se
it couldn't be that simple ;-)
Thanks!
-Chris
On Dec 15, 2007, at 9:32 PM, Chris Kuhn wrote:
I know nothing of any Vodaphone pcmcia cards. This is just "normal"
off-the-shelf usb<->rs232 adapter that plugs into the USB port on
the host machine to provide an RS232 port. On
Giljam Koch wrote:
Hello Richard,
Thanks for your reply. No. It’s still default. I did however conclude
the following:
When I disable my own PPTP VPN server, the outbound VPN’s work again.
Can anyone confirm this? Does this have something to do with this
infamous “GRE connection tracking”
Chris Kuhn wrote:
small update:
on my other (recently setup) BSD system, which is: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE
#0: Fri Jan 12 10:40:27 UTC 2007
I see in /usr/src/sys/dev/usb that uftdi.c and "usbdevs" contain a
definition for this device.
I'm not sure exactly what kernel change wou
Giljam Koch wrote:
Hi Chris!
Thanks for the reply! I've got a few IP-addresses left. How can I
separate the PPTP connections from the normal traffic? I suppose I have
to use the gateway and some rule, but do you have more details?
Probably the easiest is to just NAT all outbound traff
Matt Hohman wrote:
Hello all,
We've been using our current pfSense install for a year now with
no major problems, except one. Our pfsense box has a cable modem on
the wan, a lan, a t1 line, and a dmz. The t1 and the dmz are bridged
together. The cable modem is the wan for the lan users. I
me, as I was hoping to get this going fast
and not need to rebuild the flash image or kernel ;-)
"mount -uw /" is my best friend.
Now I just need to do some crontab work...
-Chris
--- Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
Christopher Iarocci wrote:
None of the images I can download will work with my application. I’m
setting up PFSense on a Soekris NET5501-70 with a hard drive and wish
to have all the features. Is there a way to get the serial console
working on the full version of PFSense? If so, is there a tu
Christopher Iarocci wrote:
Is there no way to default it to the serial console before putting the hard
drive in the 5501 except this procedure? This means I have to have a piece of
hardware with VGA, keyboard and 2 NIC cards that also will connect a SATA II
drive. I don't have that sort of h
ly that'd resolve
the issue the OP was trying to work around?
Regards,
Chris
--
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited
For full contact details visit http://www.minotaur.it
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons
--
Christopher Iarocci wrote:
Or, make an image for the full version that is an image, not an iso, that also
have the serial port enabled. This way it could be written to a hard drive
bound for an embedded machine and just plopped in place with no fancy work
arounds.
We can't provide an image
Christopher Iarocci wrote:
Sean,
Will the ISO allow me to install to a hard drive hung off a machine by
a USB adapter, or will it only work if the hard drive is connected to
the motherboard? I imagine I have to boot a machine off the CD
created by the ISO and that will run me through an
Angelo Turetta wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
Matt Hohman wrote:
Is is a know bug to only be able to receive them on the WAN
interface, any ideas on what I'm missing if not?
Services running locally don't work with OPT WANs at this time
without static routes, this is a known
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=158
Feel free to discuss/offer your thoughts here on the list, in the
comments there, or email me.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is unbelievably frustrating. Bellsouth/AT&T's tech support (at
least first level, I've had no luck getting further than that) are
completely worthless, if the PPPoE on the modem works they can't help
any further (even though they clearly broke *something*, our and
m0n0wall's PPPoE works fo
Jaye Mathisen wrote:
Anybody done this?
Seems like a fairly easy way to add stuff w/o having to figure
out the pfsense package/init/etc system, while leaving pfsense
to do the fw/routing and all that other icky stuff. (Other
than getting the jail started the first time with jailer).
I thin
Paul M wrote:
is this a known feature/bug?
using firefox on linux and setting minimum font size to 13, and the
metallic theme on pfsense 1.2RC3, I find that the diagnostics "tab"
wraps off the end and appears under the system tab, and then you can't
access anything under the system tab any more.
DLStrout wrote:
I upgraded a pfS box over vacation to SNAP:
1.2-RC3
built on Sat Dec 29 09:06:06 EST 2007
and I have several users that are complaining
(well not complaining .. cheering actually) that
they never get challenged for UN/PW. I just
confirmed this with my WiFi laptop and sure enoug
Paul Cockings wrote:
Bridging is possible (and it works for everything I tested except port
80), but I don't think many people are using this configuration. My
reason to use this method is I hold a belief that NAT buggers about
with things, and wanted to cut NAT out the loop. Just to use pfse
Jian Zhang wrote:
Dear all,
I already installed the development edition of pfsense on Vmware
workstation 6. It is almost well, but I still met two problems:
1. During the dev bootstrap process, the script reported the below errors:
Unknown collection “tools”
Unknown collection “www”
Howev
Jason W. Allen wrote:
At this point, I've let is wait since just about the same time I sent that
email. That was about 45 minutes ago :-)
Has it booted yet? You have to give it a while, it's only been ~3.5
hours. ;)
The only time I've seen a system hang at that point, it's been caused
Jeroen wrote:
On a side note; the reason I disabled shaping was it applied to all
interfaces.
For example; I have a 14Mb WAN connection, and shaped it accordingly
(NNTP low, HTTP high etc etc etc).
LAN <> WAN works perfectly (get's shaped)
Wireless <> Wan works perfectly (get's shaped)
LAN <
Bill Marquette wrote:
Your reply traffic from 192.168.12.0/24 is bypassing the pfsense box
and returning directly to your PC. This breaks stateful inspection.
You are better off moving 192.168.12.0 behind the pfsense box on
another nic, or adding a static route on your PC tht points
192.168.12.0
John Sellens wrote:
Hi - I've got a couple of embedded firewall boxes (older GB1000
Celeron, VIA chipset boxes from gta.com) but the stock
pfSense-1.2-RC3-Embedded.img won't boot properly on them.
The kernel starts up, sees devices, but fails to mount root.
It looks like the compact flash card i
Ryan Rodrigue wrote:
i have a dsl account with a pppoe connection and a static ip address given
by at&t. unfortunatly, the pppoe doesn't get the correct ip address. a
ceap linksys router i have lets me put the ip address in and everything
works as expected. Is there a way to do this in pfsense
The pfSense development team is happy to bring you the final release
candidate in the 1.2 series!
Info here:
http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=164
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
tester wrote:
Hello,
as subject, being worried I'd like to know if
pfSense's UPNP implementation is also affected:
I'm sure it most likely is, it's a protocol issue, not an
implementation-specific issue. This is why we said for a long time "this
is bad, no we won't implement it", but after it
Ron Lemon wrote:
Good Afternoon All,
I have a satellite internet connection, both in and out, attached to a
pfSense 1.2RC3 box.
Lately I have been having a connection issue keeping my connection
stable on the stat elite for some unknown reason.
When the connection gets dropped it usually
Gabriel Green wrote:
Hi all:
I have 1.2RC2-beta1 on a PC installed to HD and want to upgrade to
1.2-RC2. However, after picking the appropriate interfaces, the
LiveCD halts on "Configuring WAN interface..." - I try
ALT+FunctionKeys to see debugging information; nothing. Then I also
tried C
Scott Williamson wrote:
Devs,
Can this be done now …
should be able to, I know there are people running several WANs on VLANs
for lack of physical ports.
and if not can it be bought, and if it can be bought, would $1000 US
cover it,
If there is some issue that needs to be corrected, I w
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 1/24/08, Richard Sperry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Since this is becoming more of a commercial project, do we have to worry about
this becoming a pay software?
Absolutely not. Never. Over my dead body. It will remain free forever.
Absolutely. Under no c
ex.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=8&Itemid=25
Feel free to contact me (off or on list) if you would like to discuss
further.
Chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to do a full install of pfSense onto a CF card. I have
tested the card extensively and it works perfectly. I want a full
install, not an embedded one, so I can utilize packages.
When I boot the live CD in VMWare, it gets stuck while installing. I
R. Th. Boots wrote:
Graham Beneke wrote:
R. Th. Boots wrote:
I was wondering if pfsense was supporting ipv6 and ipv6-in-ipv4
tunnels?
It is my understanding that the kernel that runs under pfsense has
supported IPv6 fully for a long time.
This is what I have noticed aswell. You can provide
Michael Richardson wrote:
I was once given a command (or series of commands really) that
fetched, unpacked, and installed (or coppied files anyway) that let me
do an update from 1.0.1 to 1.2 RC4, but I’ve misplaced it. Could
someone provide that again? As best I recall, the output of fetch wa
R. Th. Boots wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
R. Th. Boots wrote:
The problem is indeed that none of your configurations show up in
the web interface of pfsense and that you are also not able to
create any firewall rules on those interfaces.
IPv6 support exists in the HEAD development tree
R. Th. Boots wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
R. Th. Boots wrote:
Chris Buechler wrote:
R. Th. Boots wrote:
The problem is indeed that none of your configurations show up in
the web interface of pfsense and that you are also not able to
create any firewall rules on those interfaces.
IPv6
Paul M wrote:
I was created a nat rule's equivalent filter rule and got the error
below. Is this a known bug?
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:149: rule label
too long (max 63 chars)pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not
loaded - The line in question reads [149]:
Michael Richardson wrote:
I’ve got a Realtek nic that is not playing nice with a cable-modem.
The System Log shows the interface is going up and down a couple times
per minute. I intend to replace the NIC (when I’m not 200 miles away),
but for now I’d like to try and for the speed/duplex to s
I've not tried an HD install, but we have about 15 net5501s out there in the
wild running pfSense and there's been nary a problem with them. We're using
512MB compact flash cards made by Integral, if it's any help.
Regards,
Chris
--
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I
In my opinion, no, you're not being fussy ... UIs should be consistent
wherever possible. pfSense (and probably m0n0wall, too) has some
inconsistency issues in a few places; I've been meaning to make some
suggestions / patches for some UI improvements and simplifications for
some time. Maybe I'll g
t take the chance.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Chris
--
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited
For full contact details visit http://www.minotaur.it
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
Not to doubt pfsense, but i'd like to setup 2 pfsense routers so when 1
fails the 2nd will take over. I havent had pfsense fail yet, but i've
had hardware(soekris) and powersupplies go out on me, and even though
its a quick fix, its still a hassle, and not to mention downtime.
is this a simpl
AIL PROTECTED]
This is a small office, but still it cant go down. Im using soekris
5501 , 256 Ram 433mhz geode procs. prolly not the fastest, but small,
low power, and price is right ;)
I've used slower and had no problems, but am open to questions or concerns.
-chris/topher
---
age development on that front? :-)
Regards,
Chris
--
C.M. Bagnall, Director, Minotaur I.T. Limited
For full contact details visit http://www.minotaur.it
This email is made from 100% recycled electrons
-
To unsubscribe,
Trave Harmon wrote:
I am having a problem:
I have multiple virtual mail servers behind a pfsense firewall. Now on
each server, I have multiple domains. Now sending to the domain from
google or yahoo is perfect and out again is perfect but when I send a
message from one virtual server to a
connections to the switch), or to provide failover (into
2 separate switches), but if you want to combine the 2, STP was required on the
switches?
I'll freely admit this is way outside my normal areas of expertise, I'm
learning as I go here :-)
Regards,
Chris
--
C.M. Bagnal
Chris Bagnall wrote:
Greetings list,
Does anyone know if pfSense includes support for failover between two LAN
interfaces?
For example, one can provide high availability using CARP to create a virtual
router IP failing over between 2 pfSense boxes, but that's not going to solve
the pr
I have a document that describes in detail the steps required to
accomplish this, though not accessible right now. You're partially
right, partially wrong. I'll put it online somewhere later.
Bryan Derman wrote:
After searching the archives, the forum and conferring with Mr. Google,
I've not
Bryan Derman wrote:
Thanks, but VLANs are not an option due to other hardware/switch
limitations.
Having only a basic understanding of VLANs, I'm also not sure how that
would apply (but would be happy to learn) since the underlying
objective is to have pfSense support multiple LAN subnets (in
Im not quite following.
i only have 1 WAN connectino, at this time. and want to setup a router
just to do basic tasks. I'd also like to setup a 2nd router, in case
the 1st one stops or hangs up. I guess I'm not familiar with pfsense to
take the simple instructions you gave. If there is mor
Thanks Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks again for the tutorials/instructions
After getting everything setup, I do notice it works fine until i pull
the ethernet on one of the LAN of the routers, basically bringing it
offline to my computer. i notice a period of time where it doesnt do
anything, and then it works, but through
Paul M wrote:
http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/tcptune/#FreeBSD
this has some recommendations for setting options in freebsd to improve
network performance; I don't know whether it's current wisdom though.
We do tweak some of that, but almost none of it is applicable to a
firewall or
I noticed that pfsense does not show the traffic used (in/out) by a user
in the captive portal like m0n0 does.
What are my options of tracking how much bandwidth is used over a set
amount of time?
Thanks,
Chris
-
To
I just answered my own stupid question
sorry, i was out of coffee today. i didnt even know there was a rrd
tool on here
DOH!
-topher
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
Paul M wrote:
Ngawang Sangye wrote:
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:191: rule label
too long (max 63 chars) pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not
loaded - The line in question reads [191]: pass in quick on $wan proto {
tcp udp } from any to { 192.168.2.58 }
Radio Tech wrote:
I just did a fresh install of 1.2-RC4 with the same results. I will try to
find my disk of 1.2 RC3 and try that. Is there something I am possibly
doing wrong.
I can assure you that changing versions isn't going to fix it, there
haven't been any CP issues in a long time.
Radio Tech wrote:
Hey Chris, Thanks for taking the time for this. When i say it doesn't work,
i mean all internet traffic goes though without authorization. It skips the
CP page. I was just trying to solve the problem. I tried it on a fresh
install without blocking anything on the LAN
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 2/23/08, Odd Kåre Qvam Trøen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi list!
Does anyone know if I can consider v1.2 as fully released now?
Look here: http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/updates/ and
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1_2/updates/pfSens
this where my tunnel hangs up
-chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bosco wrote:
Hi all,
I am using pfSense solution for a while (about 6 months) -
version 1.2 with 1 LAN + 3 WANs - and sometimes the Download or Upload
traffic goes very high.
How do I know who (the LAN IP address) is downloading or
uploading - any package or command ?
T
Jure Pečar wrote:
Hello,
I rushed to 1.2 as many others did I presume ;)
Indeed, the one mirror out of 11 that I have checked stats on has seen
4,000 downloads in the first 24 hours.
I'm running 1.0-RELEASE on my home fw (simple adsl and two subnets). And I
am not able to upgrade it to
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 2/27/08, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
1. fetch the upgrade file
fetch
http://files.pfsense.org/mirror/updates/pfSense-Full-Update-1.2-RELEASE.tgz
2. Run the upgrade command
/etc/rc.firmware pfSenseupgrade pfSense-Full-Update-1.2-RELEA
Paul M wrote:
http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=66&Itemid=71
the unsubscribe email address is incorrect in the href for
support-unsubscribe, it's the same as the subscribe one!
Fixed, thanks!
--
SD wrote:
Looks like I figured it out (after 3 hours last night, and 4 hours
tonight using the backup xml config files).
We had the MAC address spoof/cloning turned on. Looks like that isn't
working properly since when I turned it off, everything works like a
charm (no static ports needed).
Matt Hohman wrote:
Hey All got a weird one for you all,
We have a pfsense box with 4 interfaces
Lan 192.168.0.1
Wan Static Public IP
Wan2 Static Public IP Different ISP than Wan
DMZ
Wan2 and DMZ are bridged.
Wan handles all traffic form the lan.
We have 3 remote pfsense boxes that use ip
Tunge2 wrote:
Hello,
After upgrading to release 1.2 of PFsense we are not able to set up
any IPsec connection anymore. No errors in the logs of Pfsense. But
wenn i put the upgrade (PFsense 1.2 RC3) over the not working 1.2
version, it all works again.? So why doesn't the IPsec tunnels
w
401 - 500 of 1863 matches
Mail list logo
