Everyone,
I also noticed this same symptoms (of 100%
utilizaton) when I upgraded from the 0.68.3 (orig
ISO img) to ANYTHING greater (eg. 0.68.12.tgz).
It seems to jump to 100% utilization when you jump
between menu(s) and when viewing/sorting logs.
I didn't get a chance to dig into it, but did
n
Everyone,
Has ANYONE had any luck w/ a Soekris 4801 . I
have had no luck AT ALL getting the 0.63.6.1 image
to boot and have tried several backwwards vers.
(0.63.6, 0.62.5, & 0.62).
Any help greatly appreciated!
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Su
Everyone,
OVERVIEW:
ver. 0.70.0
installed on p42.8Ghz
remote logging configured and WORKING.
PROBLEM:
when I check the box to "prevent logs from being
written to local disk" and select to save it
throws the error --> "ERROR: the changes could not
be applied (error code 1)."
Any ideas BTW no
I saw the post on the BLOG about ver 0.70.2
but can seem to find it on the updates link or in
the downloads directory at http://www.pfsense.com/
Am I missing something???
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
Everyone,
Has anyone tried the new 0.71.x WARP version on a
Soekris 4801 yet?
If so could you provide any findings / gotchas?
Regards,
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
I have noticed the following !!MINOR!! GUI issues:
Pages affected:
"Diagnostics: IPSec: SPD"
"Diagnostics: IPSec: SAD"
-> The "delete" graphic (right hand of table) is
missing completely in Mozilla and you can see a
image outline and shadow in IE.
--
Pages affected:
"Diagnostics:
Is there a new "update" reflecting the changes? I
still only see the 0.71.2 update out there on the
new mirror sites.
> Thanks Scott,
> for the "services_captiveportal_mac.php"
correction. Btw I use a WRAP
> image, could I just download the corrected file?
and upload to
> pfsense?
Everyone,
I get the following line above the table when I
click on the PPTP tab on the "Diagnostics: System
logs: PPTP VPN" page.
/usr/sbin/clog: ERROR: log_file argument must be
specified. usage: /usr/sbin/clog [-i -s log_size]
[ -f ] log_file
Any ideas?
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems P
Everyone,
When I updated to 0.72.2 I broke the install and
the system will not boot now ... it complaines:
"Can't work out which disk to boot from"
My question:
Is there a way to mount the fs from the boot
CD-ROM and recover the XML config file (my bad I
never backed up the newest config after u
Is it possible to backdown a version 0.72.2 to
0.71.12?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have several sites w/ nailed up VPNs and wish to
force some sites throught the tunnel ONLY !!!
(another words ... no split tunneling on the RO
(remote office) end ... I want all the network PC
traffic at the RO to traverse the tunnel and be
handled at the HO (home office) side.
I've played with
Are the updates posted to the mirrors static or
are they updated based upon changes throughout the
day/multiday timeline.
A little clarity if I grabbed the 0.73.2
update last night and then I see a difference in
time on the mirrors this morning... does hat mean
that the file name is the same
Probably answered, but can't locate the specifics
..
1. can you run 3DES/MD5 tunnels wo/ hardware
crypto accelerators?
2. can you build a tunnel on two different
phase1&2 encryption/hash(s) ...
or do they have to match?
eg:
I build tunnel this way ...
phase1 > Blowfish / SHA1 / PSK
phase2 >
Everyone,
Can anyone tell me what's going on with the ISO
images. I have tried several of the newest
releases (0.73.x, 0.72.x & 0.71.x) w/ all the same
results the system boots fine as a bootable
ISO, but when you run the install script
[/FreeSBIE/scripts/install.sh] it fails everytime
at th
Everyone,
Reported earlier that the
/FreeSBIE/scripts/install.sh loads fine. As the
first few lines pass by it states that the
"Backend is Loading", but when the screen switches
to the ANSI graphics, it simple states (bottom
lower, left) "Waiting for Backend"
If I ctrl-C out (of ANSI screen) the
Everyone,
Hope the hack-a-thon went well.
I have had a strange happening since ver.0.73.0
every time I apply an full-package-upgrade it
seemingly corrupts the state table and then I get
NO traffic past the pfSense box.
AUDIT TRAIL:
Running a clean 0.68.x install
upgrade to 0.73.0 --- all
I also get a very weird happening w/ the 0.74.0
ver ... when I upgraded I started seeing this
message on the console .
XML error: TUNNEL at line 554 cannot occur more
than once
I have multiple VPNs defined (each subsection
starting w/ directives).
It seen to read in the first tunnel inf
I've noticed that ever since the downloads/updates
are not hosted by pfSense anymore that there are
big inconsistencies accross the mirrors (at least
on the two Seattle (US) mirrors.
Any reason for this?
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
--
Anyone,
I have tried burning all of the version 0.73.x
ISOs, and still the problem of when you launch the
"/FreeSBIE/scripts/install.sh" script it hangs on
the "Waiting for Backend" ANSI screen.
Additionally, a couple of mesages pop up on the
bottom of the screen ... xl0 link changed state to
DOW
> pfSense-LiveCD-0.74.4.iso is the latest.
>
> On 8/10/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Anyone,
> >
> > I have tried burning all of the version 0.73.x
> > ISOs, and still the problem of when you launch
the
> > "/FreeSBIE/scripts/i
same boat as well on Dell GX 110's. I have fol!
lowed
the 'upgrade> solution' of installing 0.68.x and upgrading from there.> > > -Original Message-> > From: William Pflaumer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:11 AM> &g
PROTECTED]Date: 08-11-2005 2:59 pmWe're hot on the trail now.I bet your using SCSI?ScottOn 8/11/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I did a little digging on the FreeBSD, FreeSBIE and DragonFLY sites and> found little or not relavant info, but I did !
a couple
of Google
pgrading !
from
there.> > > -Original Message-> > From: William Pflaumer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:11 AM> > To: David Strout> > Cc: support@pfsense.com> > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] ISO problems ... still> &
I can't say the same here ..I've tried the following ..pri master = 10GB HDDpri slave = emptysec master = emptysec slave = Samsung CD-ROMNOT WORKING !! Still hangs on the "Waiting for Backend"Next I tried .pri master = 10GB HDDpri slave = emptysec master = Samsung CD-ROMsec slave = emp
Did I miss a post or are the traffic graphs still not working w/ 0.74.8I have the current SVG 3.0.3 plug-in running w/ IE 6--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC
All,I see that there is a new ISO this morning and I pulled it down to try it and I get thevery same symptoms (all be it on the GX260 ... where you have pri master = HDD, sec master = CD-R/RW/ROM).It hangs STILL on the "Waiting for Backend" screen and I tried running the lua cammand that Scott had
I have an old Dell Precission w/ PCI-X slots and use the Intel (PCI/PCI-X) quad 10/100/1000 card (I have two working flawlessly w/ 0.74.8) that's my reccomendation - stick w/ intel on many/multi homed (more than 2-3 NICs) boxes.--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC- Original Message -
Does this also apply to > versions? say 0.71,2,3 & 4 branches?--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC- Original Message -Subject: [pfSense Support] Avoid 0.70+ if your using IPSECFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: support@pfsense.comDate: 08-15-2005 12:36 pmWe've got a small bug in IPSEC s
I also ran into the same issue when installed from the 0.68.x branch. It seems to be a known issue w/ Chris and the dev team a caviat is that is if you install from the 0.70.x branch you can successfully install right up to 0.74.8 without issues.As has been discussed it seems to be centered
I found that the 0.76.4.iso still hangs ("Waiting for Backend" on ANSI screen) EVEN when the CD & HDD ARE on the same channel (ie: primary). I did successfully do an upgrade from 0.74.8 > 0.77 this morning and all went fine. I haven't seen a newer version of the iso (0.76.4 has been up on the mi
Everyone,On the newest version of the ISO (0.79.2) it produces the same error as I've been getting on previous ISOs ... (Waiting for Backend). But in doing as the pfSense website indicates "Run 'installer' from the menu" I get a new setup/install.My ? is: are we to run installer from the menu or
be able to run
the online-update at the end of the installationprocess)
4.
Enter "installer" from the shellmenu (at the menuitemprompt, not going to shell)
including the online-update if you wish to do so
Holger
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----Von: David Strout
[mailto:[EMAI
Everyone,
I have seen these messages recurring in my system
logs (since 0.68.x). Although, I haven't seen it
on all systems, but this shows up on the Dell GX
systems and a couple of generic "white box" PCs.
It doesn't seem to cause any problems w/ the IPSec
systems, but I am just wondering what
I get the VERY same message when trying the image
on a Advantech FWA-3680.
http://www.advantech.com.tw/products/Model_Detail.asp?model_id=1-U89SJ&BU=NCG&PD=
or
http://partner.advantech.com.tw/epartner/Files/Temp/1-BS37P-3.pdf
The problem I have w/ the Advantech appliance is
that there is no way o
Sorry FWA-3660-02
> I get the VERY same message when trying the
image
> on a Advantech FWA-3680.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have just updated from 0.82.4 > 0.86.4 and find
that the webConfigurator (custom) username is
still not being used (still uses admin). I found
this to be the case in the 0.86 version also.
Though upon looking at the config it clearly shown
the username change in the config file.
Thoughts/fixes
> Bug.
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=598,6
So, is there a manual edit I can do to fix this,
as the CVS track shows?
> Scott
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Everyone,
Has there been any progress on the webConfigurator
username issue?
I have not tried to do a clean ISO CD re-install
and apply the config ... has anyone else?
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
-
To un
GREAT news ... thanks for the timely turnarounds
! (or should I say ALL of the timely
turnarounds).
> Yes it's fixed and will be released sometime
today or tomorrow. There
> are too many files and conditions to update
manually.
-
I have been following the CVS track and noticed
that there has been a couple of version bumps
(0.86.8, 0.87), any update on when they will be
pushed to the mirrors?
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
-
To unsubsc
Is there any benefit to doing a clean install as
opposed to doing an upgrade? Just suspicious as
to what lingering files don't get upgraded w/ the
upgrade (if any at all). Is there any real
benefit to doing a clean format/install w/ the
newest ISO?
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LL
Is there a newer release than 0.86.4 ... been
waiting for a mirror update to get the newest
0.86.8 or 0.87 release but haven't seen anything
newer than 0.86.4
Just looking forward to getting the
webConfigurator username update implemented.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
I noticed that when you upzip the current 0.87 ISO
image that it unzips to an image called
FreeBSIE.iso ... is that correct or is that a new
naming convention? I am use to seeing the ISOs
named "pfSense-LiveCD-ver.iso"
Please forgive my ignorance.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
How come there are no files on any of the mirrors?
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have noticed upon doing a re-install to 0.87
(EVERYTHING WORKS FANTASTIC !) that the one
thing that is broken is the ability to connect via
the serial port.
Is this fixed in the 0.88 version.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
--
t; 0.88+ and restore a config.xml from backup.
>
> In terms of the serial console, this was brought
up yesterday IIRC and
> it's not fixed as of yet.
>
> On 10/21/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I have noticed upon doing a re-install to 0.87
> &g
Is the console (tty) connection issue fixed in the
newest 0.89.2 version?
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everyone,
A couple of things w/ 0.90 install.
1.
When booting after the (clean) install of 0.90
from ISO I get a message about ..
[invalid argument supplied for foreach in line 308
of /etc/inc/services.inc]
I have looked at the file and see NO syntaxing
wrongs, but then again .. my PHP is not an
This appears to be corrected in ver 0.90a ...
sorry for jumping the gun.
> [invalid argument supplied for foreach in line
308 of /etc/inc/services.inc]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-ma
Anybody have any luck in getting a console
connection going "Enable Serial Console"?
I have been following the CVS track ticket number
7039, but see little activity on it since
10.25.05, has it been fixed in the current 0.90a
ver., or am I mis-configured? I am running the
same box/config as befor
Date: 11-02-2005 3:20 pm
> On 11/2/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Anybody have any luck in getting a console
> > connection going "Enable Serial Console"?
> >
> > I have been following the CVS track ticket
number
> > 7039, but see
o: support@pfsense.com
Date: 11-02-2005 3:33 pm
> Just wondering, what kind of serial cable do you
have?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Strout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 2:26 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: Re: [pf
I have to say that I don't necessarily agree with
the statement. I have had it working on EXACTLY
the same system(s) w/ the same cable before, but
to satisfy my curiosity and that of those out
there ... I just tried a db9 to db9 null-modem
cable to no avail ...
I just went so far as to setup a C
Is there any news on the next release 0.9x, am
running 0.90a now and all seems to be working
fine. I did try the 0.9x ver when it appeared,
but QUICKLY reverted as it seemed to be broken
(that was a couple of days ago).
Also, is there any news on the console connection
issue [fixed/not fixed]? I
I'll ask it again .
Is there any news on the next release 0.9x, am
running 0.90a now and all seems to be working
fine. I did try the 0.92 ver. when it appeared,
but QUICKLY reverted as it seemed to be broken
(that was a couple of days ago).
Also, more importantly (to me anyways), is there
a
Everyone,
Been kinda laxed on the reporting issues to the
list lately, so here goes
Had a VERY sucessful run w/ 0.90 & 0.90a
- config backup snapped right in from prior ver.
0.8x.
- great ease w/ new ISO installs (no installer
issues).
Had relatively good luck w/ 0.94 ISO
- config restor
On 11/23/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> first I get a CD boot time message that is
>> concerning.
>> acd0: FAILURE-READ-BIG MEDIUM ERROR asc=0x02
>> ascq=0xd0 error=4
>Try a different CD Rom reader.
I have duplicated this issue on several CD read
> Can I ask if FreeBSD 6.0 release runs on these
boxes with none of the
> issues you mention?
Indeed it does, and quite well I might add.
> And second I wounder what type of hardware is in
these boxes. are you
> using nvidia based chipsets? broadcom or 3com
network cards ? why dont
> you break d
When setting up a pfS on a lan w/ a default
gateway already installed, I would think that you
would want to add a "static route" entry to point
the LAN subnet to the "OTHER" (fwall) default
router.
EXAMPLE:
I have an existing LAN w/ a working GW/FW and I
have installed a pfS box for the sole purpo
I have noticed that the output from the ping menu
items is VERY hard to read and of a grey color on
Firefox and Netscape/Mozilla browsers.
Could the tag be better modified to use a
class definition ...
Ping output:
Some examples on this are here ...
http://www.codetoad.com/html/text/pre_tag.asp
There have been several requests to shut off IPv6
functionality in pfSense. I am wondering if there
is an easy way to do this and if it can be
incorporated into the webConfigurator w/ a check
box. From my experiences it is a kernel compile
time issue but I was asked to pose the question.
Maybe n
Nice job on the fix for SVG ... long awaited.
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Traffic Graph
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 12-04-2005 3:14 pm
> Upgrade to 0.95.4
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
When trying to start doormand I get an error about
a missing library:
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libpcap.so.3"
not found, required by "doormand"
Any thoughts I have scanned the system and do
not find the library.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
-
I get this warning after I go to the:
System: Firewall: Aliases: Edit screen
I have an alias of "allowedports" configured for
use in firewall rules which consists of ports:
20,21,22,23,25,53,80,110,443,500,5190,5050,6000,9100
When I go to add to or edit the ports I get the
following error:
Warnin
se-utils.inc?rev=1.316.2.29;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag=RELENG_1
> that would be great.
>
> On 12/22/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I get this warning after I go to the:
> > System: Firewall: Aliases: Edit screen
> >
> > I have a
Am I suppost to put this file into the system
somewhere and run it as a script . sorry don't
quite understand ... my ignorance.
> If you could test
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/pfSense/etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc?rev=1.316.2.29;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag=RELE
n/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/pfSense/etc/inc/pfsense-utils.inc?rev=1.316.2.29;content-type=text%2Fplain;only_with_tag=RELENG_1
> that would be great.
>
> On 12/22/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I get this warning after I go to the:
> > System: Firewall
fsense.com
Date: 12-22-2005 1:42 pm
> It looked like it was hanging on a nat rule
without a source address.
>
> On 12/22/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Could it possibly be because I'm doing an
upgrade
> > rather than a fresh ISO install between vers,
e send me /cf/conf/config.xml offlist so
that I can import it
> into vmware and try to fix the issue.
> On 12/22/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I tried putting this file in the /etc/inc/
> > directory and tsted creating a new alias group
of
> > ports
Would it be to much trouble to add a link in the
side/top menu to go to the status.php page.
Rather than have to type/edit the address line.
I just find that the status page gives a welth of
info and feel that it would be a good addition to
the Diagnostics Menu.
IMHO .. of course.
--
David L. S
Can anyone tell me if there has been any progres
in getting the doorman package working in the
current version?
I posted a few weeks ago about the "libpcap.so.3
not found" error when trying to start doormand
http://www.mail-archive.com/support@pfsense.com/msg03339.html
Just trying to follow up
Has anyone seen these arrors before? It looks
like the tunnels aren't working.
Dec 24 13:34:01 racoon: DEBUG: pfkey X_SPDDUMP
failed: No such file or directory
Dec 24 13:34:01 racoon: DEBUG: get pfkey X_SPDDUMP
message
Thoughts
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
--
I have notices since installing BETA1 that the
firewall logs report "NEARLY" everything as ESP
protocol. I have hit the outside of pfS with many
packets and nmap'd the outside interface and all
reports as ESP protocol.
Thoughts?
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
--
I've noticed since installing BETA1 that there is
no longer an up arrow key command history
retrieval not exactly sure when this
disappeared, but would have to be 0.97 - BETA1
timeframe.
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
-
5 1:37 pm
> Turn on raw logs and compare. Please show me a
line where it is matching false.
>
> My logs here only show TCP and UDP and some
ICMP.
>
> On 12/26/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I have notices since installing BETA1 that the
> > firew
Yes, the only difference is that I checked "show
raw logs" on the setting page.
> Are you sure these are the matching records? I
see differences.
>
> On 12/26/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Here is the enhanced log:
> >
>
te:
> > Are you sure these are the matching records?
I see differences.
> >
> > On 12/26/05, David Strout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Here is the enhanced log:
> > >
> > > Dec 26 13:37:39 WAN 24.39.130.241.3129
> > > 24.39.185.78.445
e: Re: Re: [pfSense Support] BETA1 error
reporting protocal in firewall logs
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 12-26-2005 1:55 pm
> You're version is grossly out of date.
>
> Please reinstall from the iso.
>
> On 12/26/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTEC
reporting protocal in firewall logs
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 12-26-2005 1:55 pm
> You're version is grossly out of date.
>
> Please reinstall from the iso.
>
> On 12/26/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > # head /usr/lo
: 12-26-2005 2:31 pm
> That's funny as I just booted BETA 1 and it has
version 1.46.2.5
>
> Are you absolutely sure you have the right ISO?
>
>
> On 12/26/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > This is a FRESH install from the ISO CD as of
this
&g
# find / -name diag_logs_filter.php
/usr/local/www/diag_logs_filter.php
# head /usr/local/www/diag_logs_filter.php
#!/usr/local/bin/php
http://m0n0.ch/wall)
Copyright (C) 2003-2004 Manuel Kasper
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
All rights reserved.
#
- Original Message -
> Ahh, wrong
I have posted this before and got but a hand in
the air "can't replicate/explain it"
So, here it is again w/ more background info.
I have installed BETA1 with a from scratch config
and I get all TCP packets showing up in the
"formatted" log as ESP packets.
FORMATTED LOG OUTPUT:
Jan 7 05:37:49 W
So, any ideas as to why this logging would act
this way?
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] LOGGING ISSUE
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 01-07-2006 11:04 am
> On 1/7/06, David Strout <
That's fantastic, but what was the problem and
when is the anticipated B2 release?
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: Re: [pfSense Support] LOGGING ISSUE
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 01-07-2006 1:16 pm
> This is fixed in beta2.
>
> On 1/7/06
On 1/7/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > So, any ideas as to why this logging would act
> > this way?
> >
> > --
> > David L. Strout
> > Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > Subject: R
Has this missing library issue been addressed in
the B1 release?
> When trying to start doormand I get an error
about
> a missing library:
> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object
"libpcap.so.3"
> not found, required by "doormand"
>
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
-
Looks like a great script to keep the pfS systems
up to dat and get them on the latest code rel, but
I get this error on a test box that I applied the
-all option to the update_file.sh script.
Good thing I tested it on a test box the
script blew it up.
Warning: main(xml_serializer.inc): fail
27;re showing
> is from HEAD!
>
> On 1/7/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Looks like a great script to keep the pfS
systems
> > up to dat and get them on the latest code rel,
but
> > I get this error on a test box that I applied
the
> > -all option to
pm
> Try this:
http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/pfSense-Full-Update-1.0-PREBETA2-BUG-VALIDATION-EDITION2.tgz
>
> On 1/7/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I just installed it this morning and conf'd it
up
> > to test and beat on I assume that the I
OK, after rebuilding and applying the latest tgz
update I now get nothing in the "formatted" logs
but I see all of the files with the "show raw
logs" option checked.
--
David L. Strout
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
pport] RE: LOGGING ISSUE
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 01-07-2006 3:34 pm
> I am not seeing that. Logs are showing just
fine here.
>
> On 1/7/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > OK, after rebuilding and applying the latest
tgz
> > update
>
> with:
>
>
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/pfSense/usr/local/www/diag_logs_filter.php?rev=1.46.2.8;content-type=application%2Fx-httpd-php;only_with_tag=RELENG_1
>
> Use Diagnostics->Edit File.
>
> On 1/7/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrot
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [pfSense Support] RE: LOGGING
ISSUE
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 01-07-2006 4:50 pm
> I really don't know what to say, I'm staring at
5+ TCP entries in my
> system
ipt
(in the central logging piece).
>
> Is now fixed. I'm waiting for clarification,
we may have beta 2 somtime today.
>
>
> On 1/7/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I've checked it 3 times. At this point I
would wait for the next beta.
Can someone point me to some documentation on this feature? I'vee seen this on all of the interface tabs and haven't seen much documentation on it.--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC
I get this error on the firmware page I'm running :1.0-BETA1 built on Mon Dec 26 03:18:19 UTC 2005Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /usr/local/www/system_firmware_check.php on line 160--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC
I just got the current installed1.0-PREBETA2-BUG-VALIDATION-VERSION3I noticed that the support for the Intel Dual Port 10/100 card that I've been using to test with for many versions isn't firing up. I have two other Intel NICs in the PC and they are working fine.These are all OLD Compaq NICs, bu
My bad . some one changed slots busmastering slot.Many appologies--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC- Original Message -Subject: [pfSense Support] NIC ??From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: support@pfsense.comDate: 01-22-2006 9:15 pm
I just got the current installed1.0-PREBETA2-B
I have a ? / feature request. If pfS IS NOT the default GW on the LAN then I suppose that the only way to direct all traffic out the "REAL/PRIMARY" GW is to enter a static route for the LAN subnet to an alternate IP address (that of the default GW for the LAN).I would be nice to have a default GW
Another quick quirp ... it would also be a nice addition to have the LAN interface DHCPable to it can be IP'd by DHCP . just to provide the maximum flexability. I realize that when doing the initial setup that setting the interface statically is imperative, but considering the prior post this
1 - 100 of 239 matches
Mail list logo
