Re: Redbox.com doesn't like SeaMonkey v2?

On 12/20/2009 7:40 PM, Ant wrote: > On 12/14/2009 8:56 PM PT, Ant typed: > >>> I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this >>> is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO >>> of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are >>

Re: When opening a(n) news/usenet server, how do I not make it download headers?

Ant wrote: On 12/20/2009 8:00 AM PT, Phillip Jones typed: In v1.x, I open a news/usenet server and it only told me how many unread posts and total posts but not download posts. In v2.0.x, it does the same BUT also download the posts. How can I have v2 NOT download any posts until I highlight a

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?till not an answer

Leonidas Jones wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: /snip/ Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare Fusion, probably Virtual Box. Phil VirtualBox is great, though I've n

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?till not an answer

Phillip Jones wrote: Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: /snip/ Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare Fusion, probably Virtual Box. Phil VirtualBox is great, though I've never tried on a G4, whi

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was attemp

SM v2.0.1's Browser Startup's "Restore Previous Session" does not prompt when exiting.

Hi! When using Browser Startup's "Restore Previous Session" option, ctrl-Q (or exit button) just quits without prompting me to confirm. Isn't this a bug? Sometimes my fingers acciodently click on ctrl-q instead of ctrl-w. Thank you in advance. :) -- "Ants follow fat." --unknown /\___/\ /

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?till not an answer

Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of "Open Source". Perhaps you should just give up and install Maxthon. Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare Fus

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

»Q« wrote: In, Rufus wrote: That a REALLY short treatise on how I've done it...and a fair start for anyone else. Some of what you wrote is applicable to SeaMonkey and some isn't. There were some underlying assumptions, such as the project te

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

In , Rufus wrote: > That a REALLY short treatise on how I've done it...and a fair start > for anyone else. Some of what you wrote is applicable to SeaMonkey and some isn't. There were some underlying assumptions, such as the project team having

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?till not an answer

Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of "Open Source". Perhaps you should just give up and install Maxthon. Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare Fusion, probably Virtual B

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Philip Chee wrote: On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of "Open Source". Perhaps you should just give up and install Maxthon. Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare Fusion, probably Virtual B

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:25:37 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of "Open Source". Perhaps >> you should just give up and install Maxthon. > Not an option, he's on a Mac. Parellels, VMWare Fusion, probably Virtual Box. Phil -- Ph

Re: Unable to import seamonkey 1.x to Seamonkey 2.0

ad...@mmri.us wrote: SeaMonkey 2.0 fails to import all my mail folders and everything ticked in the selection what should be imported. After it imports and correctly finds the correct profile, it just still shows blank mail folders. If I restart SeaMonkey mail, it asks me again if I want to co

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

»Q« wrote: In, Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. The user's point of view is irrelevant in this case, and not what we were talking about. It was a development issue

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

NoOp wrote: On 12/20/2009 07:36 PM, Rufus wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: ...if users aren't being considered in a development path, that's a pretty inconsiderate way to "develop" a product. I fully agree. The picture is just not that simple usually, and most of the time it's tradeo

Re: SM 2.0.1 freezing

Bob Minchin wrote: Since updating to SM2.0.1. both the browser and email lock up for a minute or two quite regularly. Previous installs of sm 1.xx and sm2.0 have not done this. I'm not aware of changing anything else recently This can happen when typing or just scrolling. I'm using win xp home.

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

On 12/20/2009 07:36 PM, Rufus wrote: > Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Rufus wrote: >>> ...if users aren't being considered in a development path, that's a >>> pretty inconsiderate way to "develop" a product. >> >> I fully agree. The picture is just not that simple usually, and most of >> the time it's tra

Re: When opening a(n) news/usenet server, how do I not make it download headers?

Ant wrote: On 12/20/2009 8:00 AM PT, Phillip Jones typed: In v1.x, I open a news/usenet server and it only told me how many unread posts and total posts but not download posts. In v2.0.x, it does the same BUT also download the posts. How can I have v2 NOT download any posts until I highlight a

Re: The SM2 downgrade

Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the developers not use master passwords? If it o

Re: Redbox.com doesn't like SeaMonkey v2?

On 12/14/2009 8:56 PM PT, Ant typed: I don't use RedBox. Thus, I'm putting the burden on you (Ant). If this is not fixed within the next two weeks or so, send a letter to the CEO of the company. Don't be too technical, but point out (1) they are excluding a portion of their potential customer ba

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Rufus wrote: ...if users aren't being considered in a development path, that's a pretty inconsiderate way to "develop" a product. I fully agree. The picture is just not that simple usually, and most of the time it's tradeoffs between listening to different user bases, or t

Re: SM 2.0.1 freezing

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:00:56 +, Bob Minchin in mozilla.support.seamonkey wrote: It's cold here too. . . . . . . (Sorry, couldn't resist) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/sup

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was attemp

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Rufus wrote: ...if users aren't being considered in a development path, that's a pretty inconsiderate way to "develop" a product. I fully agree. The picture is just not that simple usually, and most of the time it's tradeoffs between listening to different user bases, or tradeoffs causing to

Re: The SM2 downgrade

NoOp wrote: On 12/20/2009 11:31 AM, Rufus wrote: ... When and how SM asks for your Master really depends (or should depend) on how you have your prefs set - for ex.; I'm set for SM to ask for the Master the first time it's required, so it should not ask at startup because you haven't done anyth

Re: The SM2 downgrade

On 12/20/2009 11:31 AM, Rufus wrote: ... > > When and how SM asks for your Master really depends (or should depend) > on how you have your prefs set - for ex.; I'm set for SM to ask for the > Master the first time it's required, so it should not ask at startup > because you haven't done anythin

Re: SM 2.01 high CPU load

On 12/18/2009 11:12 AM, Zanqeutil wrote: > I love Seamonkey 2.0 and now 2.01 ! > > The migration went without any problems, SM2 ipmorted everything from > SM 1.1.18. > > Question. > > This site completely feezes my PC in SM2. > > http://www.daralhayat.com/morenews/english/ > > SM2 CPU load is

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

Mike C wrote: > Ken Rudolph wrote: >> Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was >> handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation >> or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check >> approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me

Unable to import seamonkey 1.x to Seamonkey 2.0

SeaMonkey 2.0 fails to import all my mail folders and everything ticked in the selection what should be imported. After it imports and correctly finds the correct profile, it just still shows blank mail folders. If I restart SeaMonkey mail, it asks me again if I want to configure email!? This

SM 2.0.1 vs 1.1.18...again...

Just been looking over the user options between the two, and I have to say that as far as the user is concerned, 1.1.18 had/has far more user flexibility for configuration, far more informative dialog boxes, buttons I could actually use, and with few exceptions behaved as I wanted it to... ..

Re: When opening a(n) news/usenet server, how do I not make it download headers?

On 12/20/2009 8:00 AM PT, Phillip Jones typed: In v1.x, I open a news/usenet server and it only told me how many unread posts and total posts but not download posts. In v2.0.x, it does the same BUT also download the posts. How can I have v2 NOT download any posts until I highlight a specific new

Re: 2.0.1 upgrade

Ken Rudolph wrote: Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was atte

2.0.1 upgrade

Wow! I just noticed that the security upgrade to SM 2.0.1 was handled invisibly behind the scenes without my active participation or even noticing that it happened (although I think I did check approve without thinking about it when Zone Alarm told me that SeaMonkey was attempting to contact t

Re: The SM2 downgrade

Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at leng

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of maintaining it. You don't seem to be able to gras

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

In , Rufus wrote: > Benoit Renard wrote: > > Phillip Jones wrote: > >> Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. > > > > The user's point of view is irrelevant in this case, and not what > > we were talking about. It was a develo

Re: The SM2 downgrade

Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth c

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Margo Guda wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and

Re: Edit msg as new SM 2.0.1

On Dec 16, 9:37 pm, z3c wrote: > On Dec 16, 9:28 pm, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > > > BeeNeR wrote: > > > On or about 12/16/2009 8:17 AM,z3ctyped the following: > > >> Hi! > > > >> Problem happens here, too. Adresscompletion when composing messages > > >> causes SM2.0.1 to hang. Disabled AC and it

Re: any word/hope on restoring form manger? (no content)

I am using it, but find the present system "odd" in that I can't understand what it will "remember" and what it won't. On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 14:07:39 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: >me2 wrote: >> > > From the sounds of things . No. > >download the Form History manager add on. It's a decent substit

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than e

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than e

Re: Can't import -any- profiles

Jerran schrieb: I just finished installing 2.0.1, and started it up. It did NOT offer to import my 1.x profile, nor could I get the import manager to run with the command line command. What happened? I'm running Vista (not sure which flavour) and I installed 2.0.1 to a new directory, given

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Margo Guda schrieb: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse tha

Re: The SM2 downgrade

Phillip Jones wrote: Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something

Re: Can't import -any- profiles

On Dec 20, 2:45 pm, Jerran wrote: > I just finished installing 2.0.1, and started it up.  It did NOT offer > to import my 1.x profile, nor could I get the import manager to run > with the command line command.  I'm running Vista (not sure which > flavour) and I installed 2.0.1 to a new directory,

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

JAS wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: JAS wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Michael Gordon wrote: Phillip Jones replied On 12/20/2009 10:05 AM Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do unti

Can't import -any- profiles

I just finished installing 2.0.1, and started it up. It did NOT offer to import my 1.x profile, nor could I get the import manager to run with the command line command. I'm running Vista (not sure which flavour) and I installed 2.0.1 to a new directory, given that, according to the known issues l

Re: SM 2.0.1 freezing

Bob Minchin wrote: Since updating to SM2.0.1. both the browser and email lock up for a minute or two quite regularly. Previous installs of sm 1.xx and sm2.0 have not done this. I'm not aware of changing anything else recently This can happen when typing or just scrolling. I'm using win xp home.

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Rufus wrote: Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. The user's point of view is irrelevant in this case, and not what we were talking about. It was a development issue, plain and simple. ...if users aren't being considered in a develo

Re: The SM2 downgrade

Rufus wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip throug

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Phillip Jones wrote: > JAS wrote: >> Phillip Jones wrote: >>> Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: > since I am a user I would have no > standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay > him to > do it. So I guess wil

Re: The SM2 downgrade

Phillip Jones wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the developm

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Phillip Jones replied On 12/20/2009 10:05 AM Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of main

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

Phillip Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Done! And you can Keep the imag

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Benoit Renard wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. The user's point of view is irrelevant in this case, and not what we were talking about. It was a development issue, plain and simple. ...if users aren't being considered in a development path, t

FYI Nuke-anything add-on blocks captcha / image verification

Seamonkey 2.0 on Ubuntu karmic drove me nuts. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: The SM2 downgrade

Graham wrote: I've been reading the posts from people who have been quite adamant, even rude, about SeaMonkey 2's deficiencies. I held off from installing 2.0.0, and waited from 2.0.1. I thought there were bound to be some problems, but how could it be all that bad? It's that bad. First ther

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

JAS wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of maintaining it.

Re: SM 2.01 high CPU load

Martin Freitag schreef: Zanqeutil schrieb: I'm still wandering why badly written java scripts affects SM2 more then SM 1.1.18 on my system. I even cannot move my mouse when I use SM2. Hum, it's not that bad for me but you're right usually SM2 should perform better in javascript performance

Re: any word/hope on restoring form manger? (no content)

me2 wrote: From the sounds of things . No. download the Form History manager add on. It's a decent substitute. Its not perfect but it will work okay. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't Break it" http://www.phillipmjones.net http://www.vpea.org mailto:pjon...@kim

Re: The SM2 downgrade

Martin Freitag wrote: Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the de

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

Mike C wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Done! And you can Keep the images. What's done? And

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Margo Guda wrote: Martin Freitag wrote: Margo Guda schrieb: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Margo Guda wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup op

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/19/best-buildings-of-the-dec_n_397686.html?slidenumber=Ipx32LRnarg%3D&slideshow&slideshow&slideshow&slidesho

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

On 12/20/2009 9:12 AM, chicagofan wrote: > I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, > or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. > bj > > > > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/19/best-buildings-of-the-dec_n_397686.html?slidenumber=Ipx32LRnarg%3D&sl

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

chicagofan wrote: > chicagofan wrote: >> Dick Hoffman wrote: >>> chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/19/best-b

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Martin Freitag wrote: Margo Guda schrieb: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either for

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

chicagofan wrote: chicagofan wrote: Dick Hoffman wrote: chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/19/best-buildings-of-the-dec_n_397686.html?slidenu

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

Mike C wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Done! And you can Keep the images. What's done? And

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Martin Freitag wrote: Margo Guda schrieb: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either for

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

chicagofan wrote: Dick Hoffman wrote: chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/19/best-buildings-of-the-dec_n_397686.html?slidenumber=Ipx32LRnarg%3D

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

Phillip Jones wrote: Mike C wrote: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Done! And you can Keep the images. What's done? And what images? _

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

Dick Hoffman wrote: chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/19/best-buildings-of-the-dec_n_397686.html?slidenumber=Ipx32LRnarg%3D&slideshow&slidesho

Re: SM 2.0.1 personal toolbar )bookmarks)

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:39:25 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: >me2 wrote: >> How do I NOT show the bookmarks folder in my toolbar? I mean the one >> SM adds that is named "Bookmarks", this isn't needed any way since >> "Bookmarks" appears in the top drop downs, and it takes up room that I >> need for

Re: Need a site check for SM 2.01

chicagofan wrote: I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/19/best-buildings-of-the-dec_n_397686.html?slidenumber=Ipx32LRnarg%3D&slideshow&slideshow&slideshow&slideshow

any word/hope on restoring form manger? (no contnet)

___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Need a site check for SM 2.01

I'm unable to see the building photos at this site. Is it my settings, or a site conflict? TIA for any checks... and advice. bj http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/19/best-buildings-of-the-dec_n_397686.html?slidenumber=Ipx32LRnarg%3D&slideshow&slideshow&slideshow&slideshow&slideshow&slides

Re: SM 2.01 high CPU load

Zanqeutil schrieb: I'm still wandering why badly written java scripts affects SM2 more then SM 1.1.18 on my system. I even cannot move my mouse when I use SM2. Hum, it's not that bad for me but you're right usually SM2 should perform better in javascript performance than SM1, not worse.

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Phillip Jones wrote: Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either for th

Re: The SM2 downgrade

Graham schrieb: It's that bad. No, not THAT bad. ;-P First there's the need to provide your master password when you start it. Yes, I know it's been complained about at length, but how on earth could something like that slip through the development process? Do the developers not use master

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. The user's point of view is irrelevant in this case, and not what we were talking about. It was a development issue, plain and simple. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list supp

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Margo Guda schrieb: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either for the browser startup or j

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

BeeNeR wrote: On or about 12/20/2009 1:40 AM, Mike C typed the following: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Click on 'VIEW' and then clic

Re: only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Margo Guda wrote: Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either for the browser startup or jus

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Phillip Jones wrote: > Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: >> >>> since I am a user I would have no >>> standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to >>> do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of >>> maintainin

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. Never mind that I was one of the first people in the project to suggest we introduce some management window for the new form data, to come in a later version after 2.0 - I suggested that back in Jan

only one blank tab on new browser - problem is back, and worse

Not too long ago, I wrote about a problem when starting SM2.01 where I would not get my home pages loaded. It seemed to resolve itself when I did a disk clean. However, the problem is back, and it is worse than ever. Whatever startup option, either for the browser startup or just a new window,

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: since I am a user I would have no standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of maintaining it. You don't seem to be able to gras

Re: When opening a(n) news/usenet server, how do I not make it download headers?

Ant wrote: On 12/19/2009 5:48 PM PT, Phillip Jones typed: In v1.x, I open a news/usenet server and it only told me how many unread posts and total posts but not download posts. In v2.0.x, it does the same BUT also download the posts. How can I have v2 NOT download any posts until I highlight a

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

BeeNeR wrote: On or about 12/20/2009 1:40 AM, Mike C typed the following: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Click on 'VIEW' and then clic

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

Mike C wrote: When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an email I only receive it as an attachment. How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? Mike C Done! And you can Keep the images. -- Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T."If it's Fixed, Don't B

Re: I Can No Longer E-Mail Photos From Picasa

Arnie Goetchius wrote: Mort wrote: Hi, I'm running SM 2.0.1, and Windows XP Pro,and use Picasa3 for photo editing. Until today, I had no problem sending photos from Picasa via e-mail by clicking on Picasa's e- mail icon.Now, suddenly, I get a notice that the e-mail photo cannot be sent, as I ha

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Phillip Jones wrote: Never mind you still can't see a users point of view. Never mind that I was one of the first people in the project to suggest we introduce some management window for the new form data, to come in a later version after 2.0 - I suggested that back in January or February of

Re: Strange issue with email/newspost

Hartmut Figge wrote: Ant: On 12/19/2009 4:13 AM PT, Hartmut Figge typed: Exactly Ditto for me, too! AOL AOL (in this specific case!) Synonym for 'me too'. ;) I don't get that American OnLine (AOL) as me too? Eh? http://catb.org/jargon/html/A/AOL-.html Hartmut Well, that's my

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:57:54 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote: > since I am a user I would have no > standing with him a developer, nor would I have the funds to pay him to > do it. So I guess will have to make do until he gets tired of > maintaining it. You don't seem to be able to grasp the concep

Re: Who are Seamonkey's core user base?

Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:10:03 -0800, Rufus wrote: Philip Chee wrote: On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:33:15 -0800, Rufus wrote: Yes, but the interface options/functionality between the two is different - most notably in that I can drag and drop Account/NG order in TB, and I can't in

Re: Receive pictures in body of email

On or about 12/20/2009 1:40 AM, Mike C typed the following: > When someone sends me a picture or a small gif file in the body of an > email I only receive it as an attachment. > > How do I get to receive it in the body of the email like it was sent? > > Mike C Click on 'VIEW' and then click on "

  1   2   >