Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

I just had a quick look at the URL you gave and it refers to an upcoming Seamonkey version 2.35 that is based on Firefox 38. In yesterday's emails also came the newsletter from US-CERT which states: Original release date: July 07, 2015 Mozilla has released security updates to address vu

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

On 07/07/2015 14:43, Ed Mullen wrote: > I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of > development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm > beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer > stick with SM. > > Kind of sad since I've bee

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Hi Ed, you find some thoughts here Best regards Rainer Bielefeld ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Paul in Houston, TX wrote: cmcadams wrote: I keep multiple partition backups on an external disk, and if something happens, usually because of something I did, I can revert without much angst. Saves needing to get fancy. I've never had anything get beyond a boot partition, that I know of. But i

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

cmcadams wrote: I keep multiple partition backups on an external disk, and if something happens, usually because of something I did, I can revert without much angst. Saves needing to get fancy. I've never had anything get beyond a boot partition, that I know of. But if it did having the backup

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

cmcadams wrote: Paul in Houston, TX wrote: cmcadams wrote: Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Same, but I do manual scans once a week, for form's sake. First and only time I ever "got got" was a Java update that changed its own settings, and I stupidly didn't check. No more Java,

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Paul in Houston, TX wrote: cmcadams wrote: Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Same, but I do manual scans once a week, for form's sake. First and only time I ever "got got" was a Java update that changed its own settings, and I stupidly didn't check. No more Java, here. Yah, I do

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

In , Paul Bergsagel wrote: > Does SeaMonkey benefit, in the long run, with such a rapid > update schedule? If SeaMonkey adopted a less frequent update > schedule would the net benefits be greater than if SeaMonkey > continued with the current r

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Paul Bergsagel wrote: Maybe the time has come to reconsider how often SeaMonkey needs to be updated. Does SeaMonkey benefit, in the long run, with such a rapid update schedule? If SeaMonkey adopted a less frequent update schedule would the net benefits be greater than if SeaMonkey continued

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Edmund Wong wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer stick with SM. Kind of sad since I've been with it sinc

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

cmcadams wrote: Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: Same, but I do manual scans once a week, for form's sake. First and only time I ever "got got" was a Java update that changed its own settings, and I stupidly didn't check. No more Java, here. Yah, I do a full scan once per week

Re: When will SeaMonkey give an update on the homepage?

On 07/07/2015 08:51 PM, Mike wrote: When will SeaMonkey give an update on the homepage about the situation? There has not been an update since March, and to potential users it looks like the project is dead. I've heard there has been some issues with trying to build new versions recently (don't k

When will SeaMonkey give an update on the homepage?

When will SeaMonkey give an update on the homepage about the situation? There has not been an update since March, and to potential users it looks like the project is dead. I've heard there has been some issues with trying to build new versions recently (don't know what the issue is exactly) but

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer stick with SM. Kind of sad since I've been with it since Netscape back in,

Create filter

How would you create a filter for a poster that continually changes the email address like this poster,if you want to see examples look at uk.legal Col.edmund J.bourke hisburkens...@usa.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Paul in Houston, TX wrote: Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer stick with SM. (snip) Thoughts? Why bother

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer stick with SM. (snip) Thoughts? Why bother updating? Just change your

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Ray_Net wrote: Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote on 07/07/2015 15:48: On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 02:43:58 -0400, Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing the po

SM 2.36 will not start without libmozalloc.dylib

I decided to try SeaMonkey 2.36 on my Mac from Tinderbox builds on the Moz FTP site, and it would not start. I compared the contents of the app package of 2.36 with 2.35 and found that in the MacOS folder, libmozalloc.dylib is missing in SM 2.36. When I copied that file from SM 2.35 to 2.36,

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

EE wrote: Daniel wrote: and, Jonathan and others, just FYI, it's my belief that if the sniffers sniffed for the term "Gecko" rather than the actual name then they would accept Firefox, SeaMonkey and Opera (and probably others), at a minimum Opera uses Webkit, so why would a sniffer accept it b

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

Daniel wrote: and, Jonathan and others, just FYI, it's my belief that if the sniffers sniffed for the term "Gecko" rather than the actual name then they would accept Firefox, SeaMonkey and Opera (and probably others), at a minimum Opera uses Webkit, so why would a sniffer accept it by looking f

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

David E. Ross wrote: On 7/5/2015 11:26 PM, Ray_Net wrote: A site, telling me that my browser is not up-to-date direct me here: http://browsehappy.com/?locale=fr Where in cannot find SeaMonkey This is the result of invalid user-agent sniffing. See my

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:07:19 +0200, Ray_Net wrote: Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote on 07/07/2015 15:48: On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 02:43:58 -0400, Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an

Re: SeaMonkey Update Fails Because A 2nd Copy Is Running ???

HenriK wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: HenriK wrote: In trying to update a copy of SM v.2.30 to the latest version on a Win7Home Premium PC, the update fails and an error message is returned claiming a 2nd version of SM is running. After a file-by-file search using Windows Explorer, I couldn'

Re: Contributed or real version - definitions? --was [Re: "We plan to release SeaMonkey 2.35 asap in July."]

Daniel wrote: On 6/07/2015 9:41 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: Daniel wrote: On 6/07/2015 5:36 PM, Yamo' wrote: Yamo' a écrit le 06/07/2015 09:19 : I didn't found any 2.35b1-candidates on : Or alpha? As SM 2.35 is going to be a Cont

Re: SeaMonkey Update Fails Because A 2nd Copy Is Running ???

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: HenriK wrote: In trying to update a copy of SM v.2.30 to the latest version on a Win7Home Premium PC, the update fails and an error message is returned claiming a 2nd version of SM is running. After a file-by-file search using Windows Explorer, I couldn't find any evid

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cannot any longer stick with SM. Kind of sad since I've been with it since Netscape back in,

Re: How dead is SeaMonkey?

Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote on 07/07/2015 15:48: On Tue, 07 Jul 2015 02:43:58 -0400, Ed Mullen wrote: I've seen several sort of oblique mentions here of the lack of development of SM. Also, haven't seen an update in a while. So, I'm beginning to feel that I'm nearing the point where I cann

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

Daniel wrote on 07/07/2015 12:16: On 7/07/2015 1:49 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 09:04:30 -0400, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote: Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 08:26:19 +0200, Ray_Net wrote: A site, telling me that my br

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

On 7/07/2015 1:49 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 09:04:30 -0400, "Jonathan N. Little" wrote: Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 08:26:19 +0200, Ray_Net wrote: A site, telling me that my browser is not up-to-date direct me h

Re: Contributed or real version - definitions? --was [Re: "We plan to release SeaMonkey 2.35 asap in July."]

On 6/07/2015 9:41 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: Daniel wrote: On 6/07/2015 5:36 PM, Yamo' wrote: Yamo' a écrit le 06/07/2015 09:19 : I didn't found any 2.35b1-candidates on : Or alpha? As SM 2.35 is going to be a Contributed Version

Re: Again SeaMonkey is fully unknown

WaltS48 wrote on 06/07/2015 23:40: On 07/06/2015 05:22 PM, Ray_Net wrote: WaltS48 wrote on 06/07/2015 15:53: On 07/06/2015 02:26 AM, Ray_Net wrote: A site, telling me that my browser is not up-to-date direct me here: http://browsehappy.com/?locale=fr Where in cannot find SeaMonkey Whi