Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

Robert Kaiser wrote: > The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major release > of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on > the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the latest developments in > web technologies s

Seamonkey 2.1 Sync

Is there a help file or go-by to set up the sync with another computer on my home network? For instance, in the setup can I use the same email address on both, or should one have a different email address? Can't find anything on Seamonkey help. Is it a one shot sync, or a continuous thing.? -

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

Bill Davidsen wrote: - is the upgrade from 1.x gone? It was noted as being a conversion feature to be removed from 2.1 and later. I ask only because I didn't see a hint to upgrade to 2.0.14 then 2.1 if the direct path isn't supported. SM 1.x used a different update system (you were only notifie

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 6/11/11 4:36 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > David E. Ross schrieb: >> In Windows XP, I requested the properties for the SeaMonkey 2.1 >> executable seamonkey.exe. On the Version tab of the Properties window, >> I see 3 different version numbers: >> >> * At

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

JD wrote: Can I install it over my current version, 2.0.14? I prefer re-boot without starting SM 2.0.10. Then copy somewhere the profiles. go to Add/Remove Programs and remove the SM 2.0.10 Install the new SM 2.1 - In case of problems ... re-boot without st

SeaMonkey 2.1 Bookmark behavior

In the past I would click on FileBookmark and be able to scroll to the folder I want. Now there is an extra unnecessary step. Bookmarks>FileBookmarks>BookmarksMenu>Choose. It will show only Choose and a few folders under choose. If the folder I want is not one of the few, then clicking on c

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

d...@kd4e.com schrieb: Wazzat, please? Rick Merrill wrote: # The new DoNotTrack HTTP header is supported (configurable in Preferences). See http://dnt.mozilla.org/ Robert Kaiser Thanks for the link! "Will companies honor my Do Not Track preference?" "Companies are starting to support Do

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/10/2011 8:56 PM, JD wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the

Re: seamonkey 2.1 - menu change - minor annoyance

Miles Fidelman wrote: Re. Seamonkey 2.1, at least on the Mac: It looks like the right-click pop-up menu over links has changed (...) what with muscle memory, and other browsers (Firefox, Safari) using the original order, I find myself opening lots of windows when I mean to open a new tab

seamonkey 2.1 - menu change - minor annoyance

Re. Seamonkey 2.1, at least on the Mac: It looks like the right-click pop-up menu over links has changed from: open in new window open in new tab to: open in new tab open in new window what with muscle memory, and other browsers (Firefox, Safari) using the original order, I find myself

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

David E. Ross schrieb: In Windows XP, I requested the properties for the SeaMonkey 2.1 executable seamonkey.exe. On the Version tab of the Properties window, I see 3 different version numbers: * At the top of the tab, File version: 2.0.1.4176 * Under "Other version information&q

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

d...@kd4e.com schrieb: Wazzat, please? Rick Merrill wrote: # The new DoNotTrack HTTP header is supported (configurable in Preferences). See http://dnt.mozilla.org/ Robert Kaiser -- Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never meant to be offensive but very often

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

Sledge Hammer wrote: Congratulations to the team and thanks for all the hard work. Yes indeed. -- David Wilkinson ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

Sledge Hammer wrote : > Robert Kaiser wrote: >> The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major >> release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! >> Building on the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the >>

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

David E. Ross wrote: On 6/10/11 10:14 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: David E. Ross wrote: On 6/10/11 8:04 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/10/2011 8:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote: Has the Update problem noted in bug #662677 been fixed? If not, will it be fixed soon? The documentation, I

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 6/10/11 10:14 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 6/10/11 8:04 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: >>> On 6/10/2011 8:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote: Has the Update problem noted in bug #662677 been fixed? If not, will it be fixed soon? >>> >>> The documentation, I am

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

David E. Ross wrote: On 6/10/11 4:27 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the latest developments in

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

David E. Ross wrote: On 6/10/11 8:04 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 6/10/2011 8:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote: Has the Update problem noted in bug #662677 been fixed? If not, will it be fixed soon? The documentation, I am unsure if it is fixed. But you should not need to worry about that.

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

Robert Kaiser wrote: > The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major release > of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on > the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the latest developments in > web technologies s

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 6/10/11 8:04 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 6/10/2011 8:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote: >> Has the Update problem noted in bug #662677 been fixed? If not, will it >> be fixed soon? > > The documentation, I am unsure if it is fixed. But you should not need > to worry about that. > > If you

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 6/10/11 4:27 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major > release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! > Building on the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the > latest develop

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 6/10/2011 8:57 PM, David E. Ross wrote: Has the Update problem noted in bug #662677 been fixed? If not, will it be fixed soon? The documentation, I am unsure if it is fixed. But you should not need to worry about that. If you mean the "Extensions installed on updates..." no it has not be

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 6/10/2011 8:56 PM, JD wrote: Robert Kaiser wrote: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the latest developments in web

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

Robert Kaiser wrote: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the latest developments in web technologies such as HTML5, hardware

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

On 6/10/11 4:27 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major > release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! > Building on the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the > latest develop

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

Wazzat, please? Rick Merrill wrote: # The new DoNotTrack HTTP header is supported (configurable in Preferences). -- Thanks! & 73, KD4E David Colburn http://kd4e.com Have an http://ultrafidian.com day I don't google I SEARCH! STARTPAGE.com Shop Freedom-Friendly http://kd4e.com/of.html __

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1

Robert Kaiser wrote: The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! ... vERY NICE! Items I found enticing: "# You can now drag and drop downloads, e.g. from the Download Manager to the de

SeaMonkey 2.1

The SeaMonkey project is proud to present SeaMonkey 2.1: The new major release of the all-in-one Internet suite is available for download now! Building on the same Mozilla platform as Firefox 4, it delivers the latest developments in web technologies such as HTML5, hardware acceleration and

SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 2

SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 2 is now available for free download [1] on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved [2] in discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product. SeaMonkey 2.1 RC 2 includes a total of 21 languages, including en-US and

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Francesco Presel schrieb: BTW, is my UA correct (I've read somewhere that there were problems with the seamonkey UA and lightning)? Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 Lightning/1.0b4pre There should not be a "Lightning" in the

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Francesco Presel wrote: BTW, is my UA correct (I've read somewhere that there were problems with the seamonkey UA and lightning)? Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 Lightning/1.0b4pre Yes, this was fixed with the 2011-06-04 Lightning ni

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

er. It appears to be working now on SM 2.1RC1. BTW, is my UA correct (I've read somewhere that there were problems with the seamonkey UA and lightning)? Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 Lightning/1.0b4pre -- Francesco

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

On 6/1/11 10:06 AM, James Cloos wrote: > "David E. Ross" writes: > >> #659731 at > > I'm sure that preference change one was in the release notes. > > -JimC While the fact that zooming is remembered on a site-specific basis is indeed mentio

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

"David E. Ross" writes: > #659731 at I'm sure that preference change one was in the release notes. -JimC -- James Cloos OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-

Zooming Problem Resolved [was Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC]

. See > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660735>. > The problem cited in bug #659731 was caused when the default value of hidden preference browser.zoom.siteSpecific changed from "false" to "true" with SeaMonkey 2.1. I have closed the bug rep

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

On 5/30/11 8:34 PM, PhillipJones wrote: > David E. Ross wrote: >> On 5/30/11 7:26 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: >>> On 5/29/2011 10:59 PM, David E. Ross wrote: The "major" bug reports: #658936 at >>> >>> Fwiw, our handling here is all

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

On 5/30/11 8:10 PM, I previously wrote in part: > It appears that the zooming is applied to a domain and is remembered for > that domain. This would explain the transfer of zooming from a parent > tab to a child tab. I only tested with pages all from the same domain > when I wrote the bug report

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

David E. Ross wrote: On 5/30/11 7:26 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 5/29/2011 10:59 PM, David E. Ross wrote: The "major" bug reports: #658936 at Fwiw, our handling here is all toolkit, but I don't know enough to delve deeply on this I

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

On 5/30/11 7:26 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 5/29/2011 10:59 PM, David E. Ross wrote: >> The "major" bug reports: >> #658936 at > > Fwiw, our handling here is all toolkit, but I don't know enough to delve > deeply on this I updated #65

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

On 5/29/2011 10:59 PM, David E. Ross wrote: The "major" bug reports: #658936 at Fwiw, our handling here is all toolkit, but I don't know enough to delve deeply on this #659731 at As y

Re: [RSS] Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On 05/29/2011 08:52 PM, NoOp wrote: > On 05/29/2011 07:17 PM, Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:42:48 -0700, NoOp wrote: >>> On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote: Stéphane Grégoire wrote: > RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in > mail, news,

[RSS] Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On 05/29/2011 07:17 PM, Philip Chee wrote: > On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:42:48 -0700, NoOp wrote: >> On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote: >>> Stéphane Grégoire wrote: RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in mail, news, about: was correct but the user-agent sent

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

On 5/29/11 6:35 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote: > I have just downloaded SeaMonkey 2.1 RC. > > It is fantastic! Very stable (so far). Very easy to set up. I simply > clicked on the SeaMonkey icon and the program checked all my add-ons for > compatibility. Then it froze (although no b

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On Sun, 29 May 2011 18:42:48 -0700, NoOp wrote: > On 05/29/2011 03:42 AM, Stefan Sitter wrote: >> Stéphane Grégoire wrote: >>> RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in >>> mail, news, about: was correct but the user-agent sent to a web >>> server was Lightning 1.0b4pre! >> >

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

your bug report is. However on mine with Lightning 1.0b4: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 and in Windows: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 I'm not familiar with using RSS within Li

SeaMonkey 2.1 RC

I have just downloaded SeaMonkey 2.1 RC. It is fantastic! Very stable (so far). Very easy to set up. I simply clicked on the SeaMonkey icon and the program checked all my add-ons for compatibility. Then it froze (although no biggie). After a reboot I relaunched SeaMonkey and all my previous

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Stefan Sitter wrote: WLS wrote: Seems Lightning 1.0b4pre has broken my UA, preventing me from using Yahoo! Mail Beta. When Lightning is disabled Yahoo! Mail Beta loads normally. I suspected Lightning because I noticed my posts on the MozillaZine forums only showed Lightning 1.04bpre as my UA in

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

WLS wrote: Seems Lightning 1.0b4pre has broken my UA, preventing me from using Yahoo! Mail Beta. When Lightning is disabled Yahoo! Mail Beta loads normally. I suspected Lightning because I noticed my posts on the MozillaZine forums only showed Lightning 1.04bpre as my UA instead of the full buil

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Philip Chee wrote: Hi! SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Stéphane Grégoire wrote: RSS still worked but I had a very curious bug, my user-agent in mail, news, about: was correct but the user-agent sent to a web server was Lightning 1.0b4pre! Thanks for catching this error. I filed Bug 660522. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660522 /Stefa

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On 26/05/11 11:30, Philip Chee wrote: Hi! SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here: https

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

El 26/05/11 11:30, Philip Chee escribió: > Hi! > > SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the > Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need > volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 > > Lightning 1.0

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

me: BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Mozilla.org/NONSGML Mozilla Calendar V1.1//EN VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VEVENT CREATED:20101214T002658Z LAST-MODIFIED:20101214T002731Z DTSTAMP:20101214T002731Z Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0.1) Gecko/20110511 Firefox/4.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.1 and Build i

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Philip Chee wrote: Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning/nightly/latest-comm-miramar/ SeaMonkey 2.1pre builds are here: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-2.0/ I'm using Seamonkey 2.1rc1 Linux 64Bit and i

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Philip Chee wrote: Hi! SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On 05/26/2011 02:30 AM, Philip Chee wrote: > Hi! > > SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the > Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need > volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 > > Lightning 1.0

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

On Thu, 26 May 2011 13:55:34 +0200, seam...@taz.de wrote: > I tried Lightning 1.0b4pre with a German Version of Seamonkey 2.1 RC1: > > - The "Settings" in the about:addons - Window can't be accessed > (jar:file:///C:/Programme/SeaMonkey/omni.jar!/chrome/messenger/co

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Francesco Presel wrote: I have been using the "latest-comm-central" builds on SM2.1 rc1 (linux x64; I've also used lightning x64), without any problems. I've noticed, though, that there's no l10n version for lightning miramar for linux x64 (whereas, there is an English version for linux x64, and

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

aMonkey 2.0 will be ported to SeaMonkey 2.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636104 - Activating/Deactivating Calendars in the left Pane inside the Calendar-Window doesn't work or somehow needs the same setting set by right-clicking on the calendar and activating/deactivating ca

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Philip Chee ha scritto: Hi! SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub

Re: Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Philip Chee schrieb: > Hi! > > SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the > Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need > volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 ... Hi, I tried Lightning 1.0b4pre with a Ge

Need testers for Lightning 1.0b4 for SeaMonkey 2.1

Hi! SeaMonkey 2.1 is almost out of the gate. We need to make sure that the Lightning version targetting SM 2.1 works well with it. So I need volunteers to smoke test Lightning 1.04b on SeaMonkey 2.1 Lightning 1.0b4pre builds are here: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/calendar/lightning

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/25/2011 09:59 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > NoOp schrieb: >> memstat lists all accessible processes, executables, and shared >> libraries that are using up virtual memory. > > The important hing to note here is the last two words: "virtual memory". > Processes reserve virtual memor

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

NoOp schrieb: memstat lists all accessible processes, executables, and shared libraries that are using up virtual memory. The important hing to note here is the last two words: "virtual memory". Processes reserve virtual memory for the chance that they might want to address that a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/25/2011 05:15 AM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > NoOp schrieb: >> $ memstat -w | grep seamonkey > > I think there's a number of blog posts out there that accurately tell > how inaccurate measures like this really are when it comes to what > actual memory is being used. All OSes onl

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

NoOp schrieb: $ memstat -w | grep seamonkey I think there's a number of blog posts out there that accurately tell how inaccurate measures like this really are when it comes to what actual memory is being used. All OSes only give you measures of either virtual memory or some random

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and >>>> later. >>> >>> Correct. >>> <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/> >>> What's New in SeaMonkey 2.1 >>> Loading the URL about:memory now shows how mu

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

later. >> >> Correct. >> <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/> >> What's New in SeaMonkey 2.1 >> Loading the URL about:memory now shows how much memory is used by >> different parts of SeaMonkey. >> >> Now if we can figur

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 5/23/2011 2:57 PM PT, Jens Hatlak typed: Ant wrote: Interesting. "about:memory" didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14 As the subject and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and later. Oops! I missed the thread title change in Google Group reader. Sorry. -- "May 10,000 a

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 5/23/2011 4:44 PM PT, NoOp typed: Interesting. "about:memory" didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14 As the subject and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and later. Correct. <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/> What

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

> Correct. <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1/> What's New in SeaMonkey 2.1 Loading the URL about:memory now shows how much memory is used by different parts of SeaMonkey. Now if we can figure out why memstat & about:memory have such considerable differences I&#

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

Ant wrote: Interesting. "about:memory" didn't work in Windows' SeaMonkey v2.0.14 As the subject and NoOp's paths suggest, this only works with SM 2.1 and later. HTH Jens -- Jens Hatlak SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On May 23, 8:48 am, NoOp wrote: > On 05/22/2011 10:07 PM, Ant wrote: > > > Oh, it isn't? It seems excessive to me. :/ > > Actually, about:memory doesn't jive with memstat. For example > about:memory is currently showing on my system as: >             Memory mapped: >             479,199,232 >    

SeaMonkey 2.1 Memory - was Re: Does Mozilla's SeaMonkey use any video acceleration features like Flash v10 and Firefox v4?

On 05/22/2011 10:07 PM, Ant wrote: > Oh, it isn't? It seems excessive to me. :/ Actually, about:memory doesn't jive with memstat. For example about:memory is currently showing on my system as: Memory mapped: 479,199,232 Memory in use: 465,726,340 Ho

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 1 Available for testing

Interviewed by CNN on 13/05/2011 00:12, Justin Wood (Callek) told the world: > SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download [1] > on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved [2] in > discussing and reporting problems as well as further impr

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 1 Available for testing

SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 1 is now available for free download [1] on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved [2] in discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product. SeaMonkey 2.1 RC 1 includes a total of 19 languages, including en-US and

SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 3 Release -- Introduces new Features

SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 3 <http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1b3/> is available for free download now in 14 languages and makes a huge list of new functionality available to a wider testing audience for the first time. Please note that this pre-release version is still in

SeaMonkey 2.1 en-US String Freeze TONIGHT

As of tonight (April 3rd) at Midnight PDT, SeaMonkey will be locked under string freeze. I was tempted to spin builds tonight for our b3 with l10nMerge, but I decided after skimming the l10n dashboard and seeing the number of strings that landed in our tree this past week (not to mention today

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 and Bookmarks

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 3/6/2011 9:45 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 3/6/11 6:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1. First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x and

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 and Bookmarks

On 3/6/2011 9:45 PM, David E. Ross wrote: On 3/6/11 6:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1. First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x and earlier, this was easy. I

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 and Bookmarks

On 3/6/11 6:38 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: > David E. Ross schrieb: >> > I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1. >> > >> > First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home >> > page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x and earlier, th

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 and Bookmarks

David E. Ross schrieb: I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1. First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x and earlier, this was easy. I merely dragged and dropped the file bookmarks.html from my profile into my browser

SeaMonkey 2.1 and Bookmarks

I have two questions about bookmarks under SeaMonkey 2.1. First, I have set my preferences to display my bookmarks as my home page. With SeaMonkey 2.0.x and earlier, this was easy. I merely dragged and dropped the file bookmarks.html from my profile into my browser window. Then I went to [Edit

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0

Hi, Le 18/02/2011 13:35, Robert Kaiser a écrit: > If it already happened, you should be able to get back your bookmarks at > least by going into the bookmarks manager and restore older bookmarks > from the Tools menu. Or you can try renaming the places.sqlite-corrupt > (or similar) file back to

Re: Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0

Stéphane Grégoire schrieb: I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks. How fixing it? Make a backup of your profile (which you should always do anyhow), and esp. your places.s

Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0

Hi, I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks. How fixing it? Seamonkey 2.1b3pre mail window look very pretty! -- Sorry for my bad english, the british dictionnary is disabl

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 2 Introduces New Features

Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: ... Release notes, including Known Issues section: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.1b Evidently you meant to link: -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. -- Paul B. Gal

SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 2 Introduces New Features

SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 2 is available for free download now in 15 languages and makes a huge list of new functionality available to a wider testing audience for the first time. Please note that this pre-release version is still intended for testers only and might still show some problems in

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 Introduces New Features

d...@kd4e.com schrieb: Are any of the new features Google-dependent? No, even though as with the previous search plugin solution, we have the Google search plugin set as the default, but you can easily set a different one in the preferences, just like before - just that the selection of othe

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 Introduces New Features

On 21.10.2010 10:36, d...@kd4e.com wrote: --- Original Message --- > Are any of the new features Google-dependent? > > May everything associated with Google be stripped from > SM 2.1 without ill-effect? > >> SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 is available for free download now in 8 lan

Re: SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 Introduces New Features

Are any of the new features Google-dependent? May everything associated with Google be stripped from SM 2.1 without ill-effect? SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 is available for free download now in 8 languages and makes a huge list of new functionality available to a wider testing audience for the first

SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 Introduces New Features

[re-sending as this didn't make it yesterday] SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 is available for free download now in 8 languages and makes a huge list of new functionality available to a wider testing audience for the first time. Please note that this pre-release version is still intended for te

Please help testing SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 candidates!

[Mostly resending with slight corrections to cover support and L10n groups as well with this message - this is a localized beta after all] Hi, The SeaMonkey team is getting closer to the next major release - and SeaMonkey 2.1 Beta 1 has the vast majority of the expected big changes done

SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 3 Available

SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 3 marks a third preview milestone on the way to the future of Mozilla's SeaMonkey Internet suite and is now available for free download. Please note that this pre-release version is still intended for developers and testers only. As always, we appreciate any feedbac

Re: Chatzilla removed from SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Daniel schrieb: Daniel wrote: However, it appears I've got no Add-On Manager!! And now I see that I have three copies of the Add-On Manager in tabs of the Browser. Yes, in 2.1a2, we have one bug that makes us open multiple copies of it, and another that makes it appear

Re: Chatzilla removed from SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha?

Robert Kaiser wrote: Daniel schrieb: Daniel wrote: However, it appears I've got no Add-On Manager!! And now I see that I have three copies of the Add-On Manager in tabs of the Browser. Yes, in 2.1a2, we have one bug that makes us open multiple copies of it, and another that makes it appear

Re: Chatzilla removed from SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha?

Daniel schrieb: Daniel wrote: However, it appears I've got no Add-On Manager!! And now I see that I have three copies of the Add-On Manager in tabs of the Browser. Yes, in 2.1a2, we have one bug that makes us open multiple copies of it, and another that makes it appear in the background whe

Re: Chatzilla removed from SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha?

Daniel wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: I just installed SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 2 and noticed that the icon and Settings option for Chatzilla is gone? Did this get removed from SeaMonkey? If so any reason it was removed? Never mind checking the Add-on page shows that it is

Re: Chatzilla removed from SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha?

Adam Jimerson wrote: Adam Jimerson wrote: I just installed SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 2 and noticed that the icon and Settings option for Chatzilla is gone? Did this get removed from SeaMonkey? If so any reason it was removed? Never mind checking the Add-on page shows that it is installed but

Re: Chatzilla removed from SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha?

Adam Jimerson wrote: I just installed SeaMonkey 2.1 Alpha 2 and noticed that the icon and Settings option for Chatzilla is gone? Did this get removed from SeaMonkey? If so any reason it was removed? Never mind checking the Add-on page shows that it is installed but disabled because it is

<    1   2   3   4   5   >