Alan Cummings wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Alan Cummings wrote:
I've been using SM 2 for a couple of months now and have to say I've
been very happy with it. (Ubuntu 8.04)
But one thing that I do hate about it (and TB) is that I can't just
select a
message and press the space-bar to open and
A Williams wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/6/2010 10:31 AM, Mike Jevtic wrote:
After installing SM2 this afternoon I keep getting the following error
message for good few WEB sites, which with SM1 I have had no problems at all
Address Not Found
www.ebay.com could not be found. Please check
JohnW-Mpls wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:35:40 +0100, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at
wrote:
JohnW-Mpls schrieb:
I debated going back to SM 2.0 now but I'm spoiled by 1.18's much
simpler handling of passwords for apps that require them. Question:
is SM 2 going to be modified to handle passwords
Danny Kile wrote:
Danny Kile wrote:
When opening an attached file in an e-mail when the file type is a WMV.
I receive the following error.
There is a problem with the URL or file you are trying to open or play.
If you are trying to open an URL, the URL may not be valid. If you
are trying to
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
Barry Edwin Gilmour wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I unlike a lot of people I Like to view PDF's with Browser So I
use the
PDF Browser Plugin from Schubert of Germany
Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 13:38:05 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
But with Nightly tester tool in interferes with PDF Browser Plugin and
also Quote Colors.
I've installed MrTech and it didn't interfere with PDF Browser Plugin.
And QuoteColors works as it should. Evidently
Philip Chee wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:54:43 -0500, Leonidas Jones wrote:
But then, how would a novice user even know that about:config even
exists, if not for the advice of a knowledgeable user, or reading a
detailed Knowledge Base article?
Seems to me its not exactly the kind of thing
Devils_Advocate wrote:
Rinaldi J. Montessirina...@senior.envision wrote :
Devils_Advocate wrote:
I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey,
then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again.
Is SM a dying product that I should just quit using already?
Devils_Advocate wrote:
JeffMjef...@email.com wrote :
Devils_Advocate wrote:
I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey,
then I have to open Internet Explorer or Firefox and try it again.
I note that you didn't give an example URL.
http://www.efax.com/help/faq
Ray_Net wrote:
Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/:
Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and
change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling
the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Jesse Molina schrieb:
I am a long-time Mozilla-suite and Seamonkey user. I'm very frustrated
that many Add-on projects are not supporting Seamonkey.
I've complained to project developers when I've found incompatible apps,
but I really don't think Firefox developers care
Martin Freitag wrote:
Philip Chee schrieb:
On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:16:19 +0100, Ray_Net wrote:
You will say the same after switching to SM 2.1 ?
Unfortunately we may be forced to do that as well. Chrome seems to have
lit a fire under the Firefox devs and they plan to abandon the 3.5
(Gecko
John Doue wrote:
On 1/10/2010 12:13 PM, Stanimir Stamenkov wrote:
Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, /Ray_Net/:
Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and
change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling
the kernel each month ... may be not
Daniel wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/9/2010 5:58 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/9/2010 5:55 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/9/2010 4:41 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote:
JeffMjef...@email.comwrote :
Devils_Advocate wrote:
I keep getting blank pages at various sites when using Seamonkey,
then
Martin Freitag wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
Just noticed that if one opens a new Tab in Mail/News from the
Account/Server home page, the snap setting for the Preview pane is not
remembered, however, if one opens a new Tab from the window with the
Preview pane displayed, the position/state of the
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote:
Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and
change again the versions this looks like Linux people compiling
the kernel each month ... may be not this frequency, however we prefer
to use a
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
One for example is the theme SkyPilot Classic. It was my favorite them
but it has an issue with QuoteColors I've posted on the Projectit.com
site's Forum and emailed support. It's as if the fellow That originated
the site has abandoned the site
JeffM wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
[...]sites[...]that use[ActiveX].
Yup.
Site owners who insist on using junk that only *some* folks have
is another case of stupidity that surfers have to deal with.
Webmaster who don't know how to sniff for browsers properly
has also been mentioned.
Folks
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 10/1/2010 16:07, Phillip Jones told the world:
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:41:01 +0100, Ray_Net wrote:
Thanks for this clear answer ... But we don't like to chenge, change and
change again the versions this looks like Linux people
Philip Chee wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:07:33 -0500, Phillip Jones wrote:
Philip Chee wrote:
Fortunately now that we have made the big move from the old XPFE backend
to the new toolkit, subsequent upgrades won't be as traumatic. If things
work out upgrades will be as seamless as Firefox
Rick Merrill wrote:
Devils_Advocate wrote:
Justin Wood (Callek)cal...@gmail.comwrote :
On 1/9/2010 9:05 PM, Devils_Advocate wrote:
I need Seamonkey 2 to open my Mozilla profile from 1.1.18 to see all
my stored passwords, but that profile doesnt show up in SM 2 to even
BE opened.
SM2
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/11/2010 12:14 AM, Rex wrote:
Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server
only' (although I already use adblock).
I opened my Twitter page, and all the user profile pics were blocked.
Found that they were coming from a0, a1, a2, a3.twimg.com
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/11/2010 10:03 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/11/2010 12:14 AM, Rex wrote:
Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server
only' (although I already use adblock).
I opened my Twitter page, and all the user profile pics were
Phillip Jones wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/11/2010 10:03 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/11/2010 12:14 AM, Rex wrote:
Today I thought I'll try out the 'accept images from originating server
only' (although I already use adblock).
I opened my Twitter page, and all
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
David E. Ross:
Bug #214675 proposes to delete the Profile Manager.
*EEKKK*
It is being extensively discussed at mozilla.dev.planning.
Too lazy. :)
Hartmut
I've read through the discussion. I think, as I am reading it, there
will not be a
Tom Pamin wrote:
MikeyG wrote:
Does anyone have experience with the different Form Managers / Fillers
Add-Ons that are out there?
I am one of the folks that migrated to FF and TB because SM2 did away
with the Form Manager SM1 used; figuring that there was no sense to stay
with SM any longer.
Is
Manuel Reimer wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
That would Be bad for Mac if we had to go to command line as we would
have go into UNIX and use terminal. That's something I don't wish to do.
In Terminal if you don't know what your doing, you can erase the hard
drive in a heart beat without knowing
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Manuel Reimer wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
That would Be bad for Mac if we had to go to command line as we would
have go into UNIX and use terminal. That's something I don't wish to do.
In Terminal if you don't know what your doing, you can erase
Andrea Govoni wrote:
Il 14/01/10 01:00, Bill Davidsen ha scritto:
Andrea Govoni wrote:
This is true for e-mails but not for newsgroups messages, AFAIK.
So what's the point of having Sort by -- Received even for newsgroups
and what does it actually do for newsgroups messages?
It seems a bug
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/14/2010 12:21 AM, Martin Freitag wrote:
Devils_Advocate schrieb:
DirecTV changed their software a few weeks ago, over the holiday slowdown,
and since that weekend when it was down, it wont let me login anymore using
Seamonkey, I have to use Internet Explorer now to
Rufus wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Manuel Reimer wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
That would Be bad for Mac if we had to go to command line as we would
have go into UNIX and use terminal. That's something I don't wish to
do.
In Terminal if you don't know what your doing, you
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Rufus:
...heh...us former DOS 1.0 users and FORTRAN coders get the concept, but
actually use the Terminal window?..nahhh...not without guidance from
above and beyond...
Interesting. On my Linux with only icewm and no desktop i would be lost
without xterm. And lots of it.
»Q« wrote:
Innews:h4-dnaaw_yrxtnlwnz2dnuvz_hmdn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
That would Be bad for Mac if we had to go to command line as we
would have go into UNIX and use terminal. That's something I don't
wish to do. In Terminal if you
»Q« wrote:
Innews:mjqdnfxvpcrqxdlwnz2dnuvz_qudn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
On Mac system while the actual system used is FreeBSD UNIX the Apple
Mac Interface does all the UNIX commands and the UNIX is hidden.
Not all of them, by far. It just does the stuff
»Q« wrote:
Innews:lradnsqnx61gxnlwnz2dnuvz_tudn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
»Q« wrote:
Innews:h4-dnaaw_yrxtnlwnz2dnuvz_hmdn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
From what I've been reading on the dev.planning newsgroup.
They are
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
»Q« wrote:
Innews:h4-dnaaw_yrxtnlwnz2dnuvz_hmdn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
/snip/
You always jump to that conclusion, no matter what you've actually read.
Perhaps part of the problem
Hartmut Figge wrote:
David E. Ross:
I was used to setting
alias rm='rm -i'
but I was working at a location other than my usual. I entered
rm *
Quickly realizing what I had done, I then entered
CTRL-C
But it was too late. I didn't lose all my files, but I lost too
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Phillip Jones:
Hartmut Figge wrote:
user: enters command
system: are you sure?
user: yes
system: really?
user: YES
system: would you like to reflect your decision?
user: $§%$§
Hart *g* mut
Well the Mac OS is not quite that way
the first 3 step are accurate
Tom Pamin wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
I'm still getting the Adobe window with only a question mark when
trying to open pdf files with SM 1.1.18 and Windows 7 64-bit. Has
anyone figured out how to fix this?
Tom,
Have you tried the Adobe test page, it is possible the web
Tom Pamin wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
Michael Gordon wrote:
Tom Pamin wrote:
I'm still getting the Adobe window with only a question mark when
trying to open pdf files with SM 1.1.18 and Windows 7 64-bit. Has
anyone figured out how to fix this?
Tom,
Have you tried
Hartmut Figge wrote:
Phillip Jones:
How Mac handles either download of software, update of software or
Deleting Files:
1. Choose desired file to Delete, the empty into Trash. (Drag to Trash)
2 Go to Finder Menu Choose empty Trash ( or use Shift-command-Delete)
3 System: Are your sure you wish
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/12/2010 6:10 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
Bug #214675 proposes to delete the Profile Manager. It is being
extensively discussed at mozilla.dev.planning.
I strongly suggest that any discussion of SeaMonkey impacts -- impacts
on either the development or end users of
Benoit Renard wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Windows as of 98 (last I saw close up) works click delete with
application and it moves to Wastebasket. Then click on wastebasket and
choose from menu item empty. There is no question. once you choose empty
its gone.
This is wrong. Windows always asks
Rufus wrote:
http://www.spruebrothers.com/
Can load the site, but clicking the enter store gets me a parsing
error. I can get in with Safari and/or Opera.
I assume it's an issue with the site, as I can no longer get into it
with SM 1.1.18 either...
Works for Me SM 2.0.2 Mac OSX.4.11
--
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 18 janvier 2010, MikeyG a écrit :
Trying to fill the void left by the removal of the Form Manager in SM
1.x.x, I have found ''AutoFill Forms'' and ''InFormEnter'' to be
sufficient ... Jus', in case there is anyone out there looking for an
opinion of what 'Form Filler
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 18 janvier 2010, Lucas Levrel a écrit :
On 19 nov 2009, Jens Hatlak posted in this forum a how-to about installing
Form Autofill, a Firefox add-on that does the trick.
The exact name is Autofill Forms -- sorry for the mistake. Here's the
link:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Lou wrote:
I got a first one today. When I try to visit www.mazdausa.com with SM
2.0, I get the mobile phone version of the website. If I go with FF,
then I get the standard version. I tried switching the user agent via
the user agent swither extension to FF/Linux,
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Phillip Jones a écrit :
Wanted to add a comment no version SM 2.0 but I can't speak French
Why don't you post your comment in English, then? From what I can see,
the page is all in English, same for the project page. So what is the
problem?
S.
Because the page referred
Philip Chee wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:53:07 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Lucas Levrel wrote:
Le 18 janvier 2010, Lucas Levrel a écrit :
On 19 nov 2009, Jens Hatlak posted in this forum a how-to about
installing
Form Autofill, a Firefox add-on that does the trick
S. Beaulieu wrote:
BearKing55 a écrit :
SeaMonkey always starts as a BLANK PAGE even though I have preferences
set to Home Page and www.Google.com!
Are you sure you did, though? I know at some point, I thought SM was
having this behaviour until I realised there is a roll-down menu in the
David Wilkinson wrote:
MikeyG wrote:
Having left Seamonkey for Firefox, when SM2 came out and poop canned
it's Form Manager, I was wondering if 'porting' some, of these Add-Ons
I'm using in Firefox only, need the install script adjusted to allow
them to install into Seamonkey, but I dunno.
I
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positioned to Mark As Read
Applying filter when: Checking Mail or Manually Run
Match any of
I've just noticed a minor bug I've had to go to several websites (bank
and such today - Pay bills - every one has to). I just noticed the
padlock remains open even on secure sites Only the the background
changes from white to yellow. This is on any https site.
The padlock should change
Daniel wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
I've just noticed a minor bug I've had to go to several websites (bank
and such today - Pay bills - every one has to). I just noticed the
padlock remains open even on secure sites Only the the background
changes from white to yellow. This is on any https site
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/23/2010 2:22 PM, Ray_Net wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I am under WindowsXP SP3 with SM2.0.2
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100104 NOT Firefox/3.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
For a newsgroup, i have positionned to Mark As Read
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/23/2010 5:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
That is not true. I use message filters on news groups and do not
have them set for off-line use.
Unless things have improved in SM 2.0 in previous versions filters were
useless on newsgroups
Bernard Mercier wrote:
Phillip Jones a utilisé son clavier pour écrire :
chicagofan wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/23/2010 5:27 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
That is not true. I use message filters on news groups and do not
have them set for off-line use.
Unless things have
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Yes it turns out the theme I was using was the fault. which was the
Orbit 3+1 2.0 is the fault.
Please contact the theme author about that, I'm sure he's happy about
bug reports and willing to fix them in further releases
Leonidas Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/24/2010 05:47 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
...
/snip/
Firefox = Fx
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/releases/1.5.html
quote
8. How do I capitalize Firefox? How do I abbreviate it?
Only the first letter is capitalized (so it's Firefox, not FireFox
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
LCARStrek is, indeed, an acquired taste, but I have acquired it, and it
works very well.
Early Blue is a very nice basic theme. My mother in law really likes it.
Heh, nice! Let me know if you spot bugs - it might take me a
NoOp wrote:
On 01/24/2010 09:12 PM, Leonidas Jones wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/24/2010 05:47 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
...
/snip/
Firefox = Fx
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/releases/1.5.html
quote
8. How do I capitalize Firefox? How do I abbreviate it?
Only the first letter
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/26/2010 10:27 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
After their latest site redesign, my hosting company's website won't let
me login -- unless, of course I use The Other Browser.
https://sitecontrol-sp.hostway.com/
Can anyone say what the problem is? W3C validator returns 8
David E. Ross wrote:
On 1/26/2010 10:27 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote:
After their latest site redesign, my hosting company's website won't let
me login -- unless, of course I use The Other Browser.
https://sitecontrol-sp.hostway.com/
Can anyone say what the problem is? W3C validator returns 8
Sqwertz wrote:
Simple mail filter that looks for a word in the subject of an Inbox
and puts it into a named local folder.
It keeps getting disabled. If I tick the Enabled box, it works
until SM gets shut down, then it unticks itself.
I've deleted the filter and re-added it. Same thing.
It
I've been commenting about I wish the SkyPilot Classic Theme was updated.
Will I had a couple of old post where I asked if they would fix the theme.
Well I clicked on the link I had saved. and went back to SailFish
Bulletin Board. At first I didn't see any post. So I set to view post in
Last
Phillip Jones wrote:
I've been commenting about I wish the SkyPilot Classic Theme was updated.
Will I had a couple of old post where I asked if they would fix the theme.
Well I clicked on the link I had saved. and went back to SailFish
Bulletin Board. At first I didn't see any post. So I set
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:17 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
I've been commenting about I wish the SkyPilot Classic Theme was updated.
Will I had a couple of old post where I asked if they would fix the theme.
Well I clicked on the link I had saved. and went back to SailFish
Bulletin Board
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 3:58 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:17 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
I've been commenting about I wish the SkyPilot Classic Theme was
updated.
Will I had a couple of old post where I asked if they would fix the
theme.
Well I clicked
S. Beaulieu wrote:
Phillip Jones a écrit :
Its the best theme ever designed by anyone for SM, FF, or TB.
What I've always very much disliked about it is the dark colour scheme.
I just can't do it.
Personally, I'd kill to get a SM version of Simple Green... as of now, I
stick with Grey Modern
Phillip Jones wrote:
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 3:58 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:17 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
I've been commenting about I wish the SkyPilot Classic Theme was
updated.
Will I had a couple of old post where I asked if they would fix the
theme
John Doue wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 6:06 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 3:58 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:17 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
I've been commenting about I wish the SkyPilot
John Doue wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 6:06 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 3:58 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
John Doue wrote:
On 1/28/2010 4:17 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
I've been commenting about I wish the SkyPilot
John Doue wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
snip
No I'll let it die. Sailfish has. No sense in beating a dead horse. I
think Sailfish is letting the website die. Something must have happen to
him because based on my reading his forums One day he was talking about
doing updates and the next day
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Eric wrote:
This just started yesterday. Every time I start Seamonkey it requests
that I input the user name and password for access to the newsgroups.
I haven't done anything to Seamonkey recently.
Any ideas?
TIA
Eric
Is this happening on this server, another
Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
BeeNeR wrote:
snip
Absolutely. That is just one of the reasons I've used Netscape,
Mozilla, and now SeaMonkey.
Yes. When did the integration take place? Netscape version 3.0 or so?
The first version I used was Netscape 3.0.a.Gold which I had to pay
$35.00 Buck
Rufus wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
I don't know that I'd call it conspiracy, but in looking at Firefox,
Safari, Camino, Google Chrome, and now SM 2.x there certainly seems to
be a vast amount of code sharing/swapping going on...
Chrome and Safari share code with each other but
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
The biggest one is opening Mail/News in a tab vice a second window of
it's own - that's integrated and really slick, especially on a laptop,
and in particular with Spaces in Mac OS X. Saves desk real estate in a
way I wouldn't have considered until I'd
J. Weaver Jr. wrote:
Walter wrote:
Please have a look at: http://www.dekalbtexas.org/ and note the overlay
in several places. Is this a SeaMonkey problem or sorry HTML coding. In
viewing the source, it is horribly bloated and I suspect it is there.
Thanks.
w.
According to
M wrote:
Mike C wrote:
I'm sticking with v1.1.18 because of the add ons (mainly RoboForm).
I'd be curious to see how many of you are also sticking with v1.1.18 for
the time being. Reasons??
I'm sticking with 1.1.18 because I have the choice of using Javascript for mail
and newsgroups. I'm
Rufus wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 01/30/2010 03:34 PM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
The biggest one is opening Mail/News in a tab vice a second window of
it's own - that's integrated and really slick, especially on a laptop,
and in particular with Spaces in Mac OS X
Robert Kaiser wrote:
»Q« schrieb:
Mozilla Messaging inherited a lot of stuff from previous
Mozilla Suite and Thunderbird developers, including a security model
which hadn't been maintained for years and was no longer usable.
And that the JavaScript we had in mailnews was a security problem
Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Really? And early versions of Netscape were just simple browsers?
I still have both Mosaic and Netscape on disk, including a version of
the first Netscape w/support license. I suppose I could pull it out of
the archives (shelf) and check it, but I seem to
Robert Kaiser wrote:
NoOp schrieb:
Really? And early versions of Netscape were just simple browsers?
I still have both Mosaic and Netscape on disk, including a version of
the first Netscape w/support license. I suppose I could pull it out of
the archives (shelf) and check it, but I seem to
»Q« wrote:
Innews:7rgdnrrlobixa_nwnz2dnuvz_j6dn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
If they want the silly tabs. Fine. If it makes people giddy using
them That's fine as well
Just please keep a way to turn the tab nonsense off. You need to
satisfy all the users and not
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
No! No! No! No! No tabs in Email/ News that are enough of a PIA in the
browser. If they are I want a switch to turn them off.
We have never said that we will force you to use tabs at any time, and
we don't plan to.
Robert Kaiser
Just make sure
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
Funny how things change. everyone now has to emulate Internet Explorer
to keep up. (Not necessarily the way it works under the hood.)
Well, one difference is that many people nowdays don't use any desktop
email client any more (either they use
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/31/2010 8:09 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
Just want to keep making the point not everyone desires tabs. And make
sure us people that don't, have the ability to customize the way we
want. I may be the only one on the groups that does, but there are most
likely unspoken
Ray_Net wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
»Q« wrote:
Innews:7rgdnrrlobixa_nwnz2dnuvz_j6dn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
If they want the silly tabs. Fine. If it makes people giddy using
them That's fine as well
Just please keep a way to turn the tab nonsense off. You
Ray_Net wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
Funny how things change. everyone now has to emulate Internet Explorer
to keep up. (Not necessarily the way it works under the hood.)
Well, one difference is that many people nowdays don't use any desktop
email client any more
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
I have tabs turned off for now. But everything opens in new windows
(which is better than tabs.) I'd like for it to re-use the current
window. I know on SM 1.1.18 there were certain sites that forced new
windows. but most would reuse the same window
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Rufus schrieb:
...hmmnn...newsgrouping is my biggest reason for wanting an integrated
suite - best way to focus on information exchange with my hobbies.
I fully agree, and a number of other SeaMonkey users probably do as
well, I just wanted to explain why a large number
Mike C wrote:
Mike C wrote:
I'm sticking with v1.1.18 because of the add ons (mainly RoboForm).
I'd be curious to see how many of you are also sticking with v1.1.18 for
the time being. Reasons??
I was hoping this thread would be kind of a polling just to get a handle
on the numbers of
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 30/1/2010 22:50, Mike C told the world:
I'm sticking with v1.1.18 because of the add ons (mainly RoboForm).
I'd be curious to see how many of you are also sticking with v1.1.18 for
the time being. Reasons??
I miss exactly *one* thing about 1.1.x:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 31/1/2010 00:26, Phillip Jones told the world:
Anyway it won't fly, everyone's mind is made up. Would be an interesting
feature to create an extension that would put it back. But probably
wouldn't get approval from the head big-wigs.
Personally, I don't
NoOp wrote:
On 01/31/2010 08:09 AM, Phillip Jones wrote:
»Q« wrote:
Innews:7rgdnrrlobixa_nwnz2dnuvz_j6dn...@mozilla.org,
Phillip Jonespjon...@kimbanet.com wrote:
If they want the silly tabs. Fine. If it makes people giddy using
them That's fine as well
Just please keep a way to turn
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
I have tabs turned off for now. But everything opens in new windows
(which is better than tabs.) I'd like for it to re-use the current
window. I know on SM 1.1.18 there were certain sites that forced new
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Its JavaScript not Java. Java is pretty secure now.
Actually, Java isn't more secure than JavaScript, it's just that Java
isn't used that much any more - and that Java runs in its own binary as
a plugin and so it's the Java Runtime developers' job
Philip Chee wrote:
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:12:13 +0100, Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Its JavaScript not Java. Java is pretty secure now.
Actually, Java isn't more secure than JavaScript, it's just that Java
isn't used that much any more -
Really? Perhaps you should tell Google
Rufus wrote:
Benoit Renard wrote:
Rufus wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 1/31/2010 12:35 PM, Rufus wrote:
Benoit Renard wrote:
Ray_Net wrote:
I don't understand why people complains about installing SM as a
browser-only. If they don't want the mail or the news parts in SM,
they can use their
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Leonidas Jones wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones wrote:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Phillip Jones schrieb:
/snip/
Phillip, I would be careful about making statements that you cannot
backup, it will damage your credibility
301 - 400 of 1040 matches
Mail list logo
