[Biofuel] Kyoto all Over Again? US Obstructive Force at Climate Talks

2012-12-07 Thread Keith Addison
Mother Nature Belongs at the Bargaining Table Throwing the nation over the climate cliff will make our current fiscal challenges look like a minor bump in the road. by Jill Stein Published on Wednesday, December 5, 2012 by OtherWords http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/12/05-8 Extreme Drought

[Biofuel] Kyoto Protocol on Life Support

2011-12-07 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/12/06-0 Published on Tuesday, December 6, 2011 by Inter Press Service Kyoto Protocol on Life Support by Stephen Leahy DURBAN, South Africa - The United States has become the major stumbling block to progress at the mid point of negotiations over a new

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto program `gutted' by Tories - Toronto Star - 2007.02.15

2007-02-15 Thread AltEnergyNetwork
essage--- > From: Darryl McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Biofuel] Kyoto program `gutted' by Tories - Toronto Star - > 2007.02.15 > Sent: 16 Feb '07 01:18 > > http://www.thestar.com/News/article/182027 > > Key office that invests in g

[Biofuel] Kyoto program `gutted' by Tories - Toronto Star - 2007.02.15

2007-02-15 Thread Darryl McMahon
http://www.thestar.com/News/article/182027 Key office that invests in green projects in developing countries down to two staff February 15, 2007 Allan Woods Ottawa Bureau OTTAWA-The Conservative government has gutted a key office set up under the Kyoto protocol that allows Canadian companies to

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto City's biodiesel plant

2005-10-22 Thread Derrick Grunewald
I am involved with sophicated analyser equipment for the petrochemical industry and even with their 100's of thousands of dollars worth of analyser equipment they still have laboratories doing tests. As Kieth says, "don't hold your breath"   Besides just flipping a switch takes out all the fun of b

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto City's biodiesel plant

2005-10-19 Thread Keith Addison
Someone just posted this on another list: >I would love to buy a complete system to make the B100, >something idiot proof and as simple as running a washing machine just add >the soap and out comes B100 ready for the tank, no measuring, titration, >filtering, washing or checking the PH. Anyone kn

[Biofuel] Kyoto City's biodiesel plant

2005-10-18 Thread Keith Addison
Some pictures here of Kyoto City's biodiesel plant: http://www.e-revo.jp/new/sisetu-sinnsetu.html Technology provided by Revo International (Japanese company), plant built by Hitachi Shipping company (official English name not known). The plant "can make" 5,000 litres of biodiesel a day. The co

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-03-03 Thread Greg Harbican
02, 2005 15:36 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science > Greg, jet fuel could be made from a number of sources such > as fossil natural gas or coal, or better from renewable > sources. basically any source of carbon and hydrogen as > found in num

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-03-02 Thread bob allen
ng to cause an increase in the cost of flying. - Original Message - From: "Juan Boveda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 15:47 Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science Hello Greg and all.

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-03-02 Thread Keith Addison
veda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 15:47 Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science > Hello Greg and all. > > I disagree with some appreciation about the cost of flying because the fuel > cost incr

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-03-02 Thread Greg Harbican
MAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 15:47 Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science > Hello Greg and all. > > I disagree with some appreciation about the cost of flying because the fuel > cost increase th

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-03-02 Thread Greg Harbican
Sorry about the delay, I been busy with illness and the furnace installation. - Original Message - From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 12:51 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-03-02 Thread Keith Addison
I notice you didn't respond to this - the discussion on your claim that the end of fossil fuels will mean the end of the fight against world hunger (below). You have to do some studying Greg, you've got this all wrong... So here's a bit more for you. http://wwia.org/pipermail/biofuel/Wee

RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-28 Thread Juan Boveda
an AvGas because they have no lead in their composition, providing for a more environmentally friendly fuel. Neiva has registered the name "AvAlc" (Aviation Alcohol) in Brazil for use of this new fuel. Regards. Juan -Original Message - Fom:Greg Harbican [SMTP:[EMAIL P

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-24 Thread Keith Addison
I'll snip most of this... Couple of points: I've never heard anyone but you proposing that we need to sequester the last 200 years of human carbon emissions. > >OTOH, I am sure, that there is currently a disturbing > >trend, that needs to be delt with, be it short term or long term. > > D

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-24 Thread Keith Addison
Best wishes Keith An important point which often gets missed is that we are adding to the atmosphere gases of known properties: they cause the atmosphere to retain heat. And, if the atmosphere didn't already contain gases which retain heat, the Earth would be very much colder than it is. T

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-24 Thread Keith Addison
Keith, It is absolutely clear that many actions should have been taken yesterday and that it is no excuse for not doing it today. Doing it tomorrow will be too late to avoid more major disasters. Yes, I guess that's right... But if we leave it till tomorrow we'll have to do it anyway. Fur

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-24 Thread Greg Harbican
Sorry for not getting back sooner, it's been a little hectic in the last couple of days. - Original Message - From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 11:10 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- noth

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-24 Thread dwoodard
Rick, world oil discovery crosed production headed down about 1981. Production must follow discovery, and it won't take too long. Discovery now runs under 40% of production; most years around 25%. For any given well and field, production beyond a certain rate reduces the total amount of oil recov

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4-Jean Pean.

2005-02-24 Thread Guag Meister
Hello All ; >From my understanding of this design, the sealed tank (biodigester) was sealed so that it could generate the pressures to inflate the tubes. There was another (seperate and different) tube wrapped around the tank to absorb additional heat from the compost pile to provide heated wat

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-24 Thread Hakan Falk
Keith, It is absolutely clear that many actions should have been taken yesterday and that it is no excuse for not doing it today. Doing it tomorrow will be too late to avoid more major disasters. It is scandalous that US did not sign Kyoto and that they are not on the forefront of the people/

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-24 Thread Hakan Falk
Rick, Before the Iraq war, the cushion in oil production was around 2 bn barrels a day. The war consumed the cushion and ever since, the oil production has been on the top of what is possible. The failure of getting the expected higher production from Iraq and instead severe problems of getti

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-24 Thread Keith Addison
Thanks so much for your response. It address a question I have been curious about. You say we are at or near the peak of production of oil. Is that because the amount of oil given the present reserves can not be extracted faster or is it because it is not profitable to extract it faste

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-24 Thread Rick Littrell
Thanks so much for your response. It address a question I have been curious about. You say we are at or near the peak of production of oil. Is that because the amount of oil given the present reserves can not be extracted faster or is it because it is not profitable to extract it faster

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-23 Thread Hakan Falk
Rick, Interesting, especially since many now realize that we are at, or close to, the peak of oil production. It is not possible to reach larger levels of pollution from oil, than the current levels. US who use 25% of the worlds energy resources, will not have possibility to grow and will pro

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-23 Thread Keith Addison
- Original Message - From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 07:29 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science I am keeping the perspective, the carbon was around in one fo

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-23 Thread dwoodard
An important point which often gets missed is that we are adding to the atmosphere gases of known properties: they cause the atmosphere to retain heat. And, if the atmosphere didn't already contain gases which retain heat, the Earth would be very much colder than it is. There are many secondary

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-23 Thread Anti-Fossil
AntiFossil Mike Krafka USA - Original Message - From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 8:29 AM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap > Hello Rick > > >Dear Keith, > >

RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-23 Thread Chris Lloyd
The good thing is China and Southeast Asia is the people there seem to like and be happy with small fuel efficient cars and bikes. Chris. -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 22/02/2005 _

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-23 Thread Rick Littrell
Thanks for the references and your viewpoint. Both are really helpful. Rick Keith Addison wrote: Hello Rick Dear Keith, You are right of course. I should study the whole treaty rather than rely on what I read about it. Also, my thanks to you for untangling my sentence about Republ

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-23 Thread Greg Harbican
- Original Message - From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 07:29 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science > > In one form or another yes, but which form, and for how

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-23 Thread Rick Littrell
I think the problem is not the current levels of consumption but the change in rate of consumption. China and Southeast Asia are undergoing a huge increase in their rate of consumption of oil, a rate that in the long run is unsustainable.How long do you think over half the worlds popula

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4-and messing with the natural order of things

2005-02-23 Thread Keith Addison
Dear Keith, Thank you. I couldn't remember if it was just bacteria or a combination of bacteria and termites. I don't follow the sealed container. How did he renew the material in the container? Was the pile around the container just to supply heat for the process or was it fed into th

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-23 Thread Keith Addison
Dear Keith, You are right of course. I should study the whole treaty rather than rely on what I read about it. Also, my thanks to you for untangling my sentence about Republicans. Um, sorry, wearing my editor's hat in the wrong place, but I was tempted by the idea of using spontaneous

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-23 Thread Keith Addison
-down, centralised, corporatist practices that are inimical to local economies and the poor. Most of the so-called benefits of fossil-fuel-based economics go to "the few who have far too much" - it's just waste, and the costs are horrendous, whether in human terms or environmental.

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-23 Thread Hakan Falk
Rick, You did nor read my post about this China-propaganda by US, therefore I will repeat it. "140 countries, which is around half the countries in the world and who represent more than 55% of the pollution with greenhouse gases, have signed the Kyoto protocol. US with 4+% of world populati

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4-and messing with the natural order of things

2005-02-23 Thread Rick Littrell
Thank you. I couldn't remember if it was just bacteria or a combination of bacteria and termites. I don't follow the sealed container. How did he renew the material in the container? Was the pile around the container just to supply heat for the process or was it fed into the container s

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-23 Thread Rick Littrell
You are right of course. I should study the whole treaty rather than rely on what I read about it. Also, my thanks to you for untangling my sentence about Republicans. I may be being a pessimist here but I don't see the world doing much about global warming in time to stop it's effects.

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-23 Thread Greg Harbican
n hope for is a slowed rate increase in atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gasses. Greg H. - Original Message - From: "bob allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 19:09 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of c

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-23 Thread bob allen
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:18 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science Thompson, Mark L. (PNB R&D) wrote: Sorry Mike Actually most CO2 emissions come from Decomposing Plant material. That is immat

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-22 Thread Greg Harbican
teady state. > Anthropogenic emissions are above and beyond natural emissions. - Original Message - From: "Ken Provost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 11:31 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/j

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4-and messing with the natural orderof things

2005-02-22 Thread bmolloy
age - From: "John Guttridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:03 AM Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4-and messing with the natural orderof things (snip) > I was just in Hawaii where they have a huge problem with mo

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4-and messing with the natural order of things

2005-02-22 Thread Keith Addison
Dear John, This is not so wild an idea as you suggest. I remember reading a few years back about a fellow in France who piled up a huge mound of waste wood chips and drove a pipe into the center of it. Jean Pain: France's King of Green Gold http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel_library.html

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4-and messing with the natural order of things

2005-02-22 Thread Rick Littrell
This is not so wild an idea as you suggest. I remember reading a few years back about a fellow in France who piled up a huge mound of waste wood chips and drove a pipe into the center of it. As the termites went to work in the pile as well, I suppose, as bacteria, the methane they generate

RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-22 Thread Michael Redler
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Redler Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science Hi Mark, You said: "Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science" ...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-22 Thread Ken Provost
On Feb 22, 2005, at 9:32 AM, Thompson, Mark L. (PNB R&D) wrote: Sorry Mike Actually most CO2 emissions come from Decomposing Plant material. It is amazing what pointing out simple "Off subject" issues in a post will do. Decomposing plant material is carbon-neutral, of course, and therefo

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-22 Thread bob allen
nt: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science Hi Mark, You said: "Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science" ...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our civilization comes from the bur

RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-22 Thread
nt: Friday, February 18, 2005 10:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science Hi Mark, You said: "Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science" ...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our civilization comes from the bur

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4-and messing with the natural order of things

2005-02-22 Thread John Guttridge
imagine whole plants full of farting cows and termites harnessed to generate the worlds energy! imagine the smell! it would have to be constructed in new jersey, it already stinks there anyway. on another note: I was just in Hawaii where they have a huge problem with mongoose, they were

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4

2005-02-22 Thread Chris & Chuck McGuire
woods. The bears were here first. I look at all of the trees dying in Western Montana of pine bark beetle, another natural phenomenon caused in part by a warmer, dryer climate, and wonder why we don't cut them, burn them in power plants like the one in Thompson Falls, Montana USA and recycl

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4

2005-02-22 Thread Kirk McLoren
The provided link said CH4 is up to 50x more effective as a greenhouse gas. The wood the termites eatwill eventually cycle back as CO2 even as CH4 decomposition but what fraction of warming would be altered by lowering the CH4. As for manage think creatively Bob. Perhaps you would have to put y

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4

2005-02-22 Thread bob allen
Not to downplay the importance of methane to radiative forcing, but it has a half-life in the atmoshpere of only a few years, (it oxidises to CO2) Now the big question: how in the world do you propose to "manage" termites? I can't even imagine what it means. Regardless of who wrote: ht

[Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4

2005-02-22 Thread Keith Addison
http://yosemite.epa.gov/OAR/globalwarming.nsf/UniqueKeyLookup/SHSU5BU M9T/$File/ghg_gwp.pdf Nice discussion re most aspects. Since CH4 may be 50 times more effective than CO2 as a greenhouse gas it seems termite management might be useful. It depends what "termite management" turns out to

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- termites CH4

2005-02-22 Thread Kirk McLoren
http://yosemite.epa.gov/OAR/globalwarming.nsf/UniqueKeyLookup/SHSU5BUM9T/$File/ghg_gwp.pdf Nice discussion re most aspects. Since CH4 may be 50 times more effective than CO2 as a greenhouse gas it seems termite management might be useful. Kirk --- Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > H

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-20 Thread Marc DeGagne
"Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science." "Kyoto is going to be economic suicide.." Just random thoughts? It certainly takes a noble man to enlighten us all with these profound, random thoughts.thoughts that bring to light the foolishness of those that even DARED belie

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-19 Thread Keith Addison
g on it's own then it certainly would be stupid to hasten the problem.Don't you think?.DB - Original Message - From: "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:10 AM Subjec

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-19 Thread Rick Littrell
to hasten the problem.Don't you think?.DB - Original Message - From: "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:10 AM Subject: [Biofu

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-19 Thread DB
MAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 4:10 AM Subject: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap Kyoto is nothing more than a means for the government in power to syphon from the tax payer billions of dollars for their friends and has very little to do with global warming. It al

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap/junk science

2005-02-19 Thread Michael Redler
Hi Mark, You said: "Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science" ...tell ya what Mark -- Since most of the emissions from our civilization comes from the burning of fossil fuels, here's a little experiment you can do at home. 1.) Get yourself a chain saw and bring it with you into your bathroom 2

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto - a start but far from perfect..was Kyoto- nothingbut a buch of >

2005-02-19 Thread Anti-Fossil
Bravo "Info" AntiFossil Mike Krafka USA - Original Message - From: "info" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 5:29 PM Subject: [Biofuel] Kyoto - a start but far from perfect..was Kyoto- nothingbut a buch of >

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of >

2005-02-19 Thread Hakan Falk
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:29 PM Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of > Aren't you stretching the reality of Kyoto a bit. What does Kyoto have to do with: 1) Housing 2) congestion 3) bad urban planning 4) po

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-19 Thread Keith Addison
Kyoto is nothing more than a means for the government in power to syphon from the tax payer billions of dollars for their friends and has very little to do with global warming. It also helps those countries that do not have a Etc etc, while Mark L. Thompson wrote: Kyoto is based on mostly J

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of >

2005-02-19 Thread Duane Shaw
- Original Message - From: "Thompson, Mark L. (PNB R&D)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 12:29 PM Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of > Aren't you stretching the reality of Kyoto a bit.

[Biofuel] Kyoto - a start but far from perfect..was Kyoto- nothing but a buch of >

2005-02-18 Thread info
es forums http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy Alternative Energy Politics http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics/ ---Original Message--- > From: "Thompson, Mark L. (PNB R&D)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of >

2005-02-18 Thread bob allen
a few quotes for those in denial: It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it . Upton Sinclair It is the nature of humans to ignore what is true but uncomfortable, and accept what is known to be false, but comforting. H L Menke

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of >

2005-02-18 Thread John Hayes
Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science. Simulations that can't even predict better than random number generators. Hockey stick temperature graphs that the author will not even provide source data or equations for. Stratospherically temperatures that are running opposite to GW models. http://

RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of >

2005-02-18 Thread
Aren't you stretching the reality of Kyoto a bit. What does Kyoto have to do with: 1) Housing 2) congestion 3) bad urban planning 4) poverty rate 5) water polluted Kyoto is based on mostly Junk Science. Simulations that can't even predict better than

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of >

2005-02-18 Thread Phillip Wolfe
Re: "Kyoto is nothing more than a means for the government in power to syphon from the tax payer billions of dollars for their friends and has very little to do with global warming. It also helps those countries that do not have a supply of fossil to gain a competitive edge." I understand your

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-18 Thread JD2005
I don't agree with this at all. JD2005 - Original Message - From: "John Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 6:10 AM Subject: [Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap > Kyoto is nothing more than a means

[Biofuel] Kyoto- nothing but a buch of crap

2005-02-18 Thread John Wilson
Kyoto is nothing more than a means for the government in power to syphon from the tax payer billions of dollars for their friends and has very little to do with global warming. It also helps those countries that do not have a supply of fossil to gain a competitive edge. We are living in the tail e

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto...

2005-02-17 Thread Keith Addison
tendance, you did >represent those members of this list >who would have chosen to go, IMHO. I think we felt that, though we didn't contribute, but did feel I should report back to the list at least. Thanks! Regards Keith >AntiFossil >Mike Krafka USA > > From: Keith

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto...

2005-02-17 Thread JD2005
- Original Message - Keith Addison> I've been watching all this for 13 years now, well longer, but in > 1992 I did a major publishing job at the final, ministerial-level UN > climate-change conference that preceded the Rio Earth Summit. We > produced an online (via GreenNet) conference ne

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto...

2005-02-17 Thread Michael Redler
gh we didn't contribute, but did feel I should report back to the list at least. Thanks! Regards Keith >AntiFossil >Mike Krafka USA > > From: Keith Addison > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:12:45 +0900 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto...

2005-02-17 Thread Keith Addison
06:12:45 +0900 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Biofuel] Kyoto... > > ... in which prefecture we live and operate Journey to Forever, and > which has lent its name to the Kyoto Protocol, which finally after > seven years became official yesterday, 16 February 2005. > > Fro

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto...

2005-02-17 Thread Anti-Fossil
. AntiFossil Mike Krafka USA - Original Message - From: "Keith Addison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:12 PM Subject: [Biofuel] Kyoto... > ... in which prefecture we live and operate Journey to Forever, and >

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto...

2005-02-16 Thread mark manchester
YAY!!! Thanks for the blow by blow, so exciting, Keith. Dazzling pleasure to see this. We absorb and assemble... Cheers, -Jesse > From: Keith Addison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 06:12:45 +0900 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subj

[Biofuel] Kyoto...

2005-02-16 Thread Keith Addison
which has lent its name to the Kyoto Protocol, which finally after seven years became official yesterday, 16 February 2005. From the AP coverage at CNN: The agreement, negotiated in Japan's ancient capital of Kyoto in 1997 and ratified, accepted, approved or assented by 141 nations includin

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto kayoed - again......

2004-12-28 Thread Phillip Wolfe
Dear BMolloy, Where George Monbiot said, "...The US is now the only member of the UN Security Council whose word is law...". My comments: The recent Indonesian 9.0 earthquake and resulting tsunami demonstrated who has the last word and who is the law. It is not a human, country or state; but r

[Biofuel] Kyoto kayoed - again......

2004-12-27 Thread bmolloy
Hi All, The US has again rejected the Kyoto Protocol, this time in at the Bueno Aires conference. George Monbiot is a media commentator. His views on the outcome are sobering. Regards, Bob. AMERICA'S WAR WITH ITSELF By George Monbiot, AlterNet Posted on December 21, 2004, Printed on Dec

[Biofuel] Kyoto treaty nations call on US, China, India to get on board

2004-12-07 Thread Keith Addison
/afp/20041206/sc_afp/argentina_climate_un_041206211720 Yahoo! News - Kyoto treaty nations call on US, China, India to get on board Mon Dec 6, 4:17 PM ET BUENOS AIRES (AFP) - Participants at a UN-sponsored environmental meeting here lamented the failure by the United States, China and other k

[Biofuel] Kyoto Historic Says Kofi Annan

2004-11-20 Thread MH
Russia's Ratification of Kyoto Climate Treaty 'Historic' Says Kofi Annan By UN Environment Programme Nov 19, 2004 http://www.enn.com/aff.html?id=204 Formal Handing Over of Accession Papers Made at Security Council Meeting Event Marks Countdown for Global Warming Agreement Entering into

[Biofuel] Kyoto Final Step

2004-11-18 Thread MH
Final Step for Kyoto Pact to Take Place at U.N. By ANDREW C. REVKIN Nov 17, 2004 http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/17/international/europe/17cnd-kyot.html United Nations officials said that the final step leading to the enactment of the Kyoto Protocol, the first treaty restricting heat-trappi

[Biofuel] Kyoto - Putin Ratifies

2004-11-07 Thread MH
Putin Ratifies Kyoto Protocol 05.11.2004 http://www.mosnews.com/news/2004/11/05/putinkyoto.shtml President Vladimir Putin has signed Russiaâs ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, formally joining the international environmental pact aiming to limit industrial emissions and thus curb climate

[Biofuel] Kyoto Moves Up

2004-11-02 Thread MH
Russian Upper House ratifies Kyoto Protocol Reuters Moscow, October 27 2004 http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_1076414,00050003.htm Russia's Upper House of Parliament ratified the Kyoto Protocol on Wednesday, leaving President Vladimir Putin's signature as the final step to kickstart

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-26 Thread Ken Provost
on 10/25/04 10:42 AM, john clements at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hello Keith > > the Kyoto stuff barely rates in Australia > the media give it a run and the green groups > push as hard as they can but we > remain sceptics. In other words, you're all as dumb as us Yanks! Well, that's comfort

RE: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-26 Thread john clements
EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Addison Sent: Tuesday, 26 October 2004 12:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,11161650 %255E1702,00.html The Australian: [October 23, 2004] 'Bad environment policie

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-25 Thread Keith Addison
%255E1702,00.html The Australian: [October 23, 2004] 'Bad environment policies continue' October 23, 2004 THE Federal Government's environmental policies meant a continuation of the practices which had caused Australia to have the fourth worst environmental impact of all countries, Greenpea

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-22 Thread Hakan Falk
Thanks Tomas, Australia 7,686,850 sq km population 19,913,144 2.59 persons per sq km USA 9,631,418 sq km population 293,027,571 30.42 persons per sq km Hakan At 03:05 PM 10/22/2004, you wrote: Autralia is the world's largest coal exporter. Also, their energy consumption and carbon emissions

[Biofuel] Kyoto Oct 22

2004-10-22 Thread MH
Russian Parliament Ratifies Kyoto Protocol MosNews 22 Oct 2004 18:39 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 18:40 MSK http://www.mosnews.com/news/2004/10/22/kyotoratified.shtml Russiaâs lower house of parliament, the State Duma ratified the Kyoto Protocol on Friday. The bill was passed by 334 votes in

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-22 Thread Keith Addison
Keith, That is true, but as I understand the official commitment and position from Australia, they would sign a Kyoto based on per capita. If their official promises and promises are worth anything, they will meet Kyoto on a per capita basis and probably on total as well. Well, we'll hav

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-22 Thread Tomas Juknevicius
Hakan Falk wrote: > Keith, > > . If you > could look at your source the area in km2 and population per km2, would be > interesting numbers also. > Hi, CIA publishes a handy book, called world factbook, where You can find all sorts of da

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-22 Thread Hakan Falk
Keith, That is true, but as I understand the official commitment and position from Australia, they would sign a Kyoto based on per capita. If their official promises and promises are worth anything, they will meet Kyoto on a per capita basis and probably on total as well. It is by the way not

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-22 Thread Keith Addison
consumption and carbon emissions are second only to the US on a per capita basis. Australia Population: 19.2 million (0.32% of world total) Per Capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP): $19,796 Total Energy Consumption: 4.7 quadrillion Btu (1.2% of world total) Per Capita Energy Consumption: 249.8

Re: [Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-22 Thread Hakan Falk
I can understand and support the position of Australia on Kyoto, but it is probably one of a handful of countries were I can do that. They will do their utmost to reduce greenhouse gases, but will not commit to Kyoto. Australia is often and especially by the Americans, as a nation that is co

[Biofuel] Kyoto and Australia

2004-10-22 Thread MH
Australia govt adamant it will not approve Kyoto By Michelle Nichols Source: Reuters 22 Oct 2004 http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/SYD74748.htm CANBERRA, Oct 22 (Reuters) - As Russia prepares to vote to ratify the Kyoto protocol and allow the global climate change pact to come in

[Biofuel] Kyoto and US

2004-10-14 Thread MH
Muckraker: Shaken, not yet stirred Kyoto will shake things up in the U.S., whether Americans like it or not Oct 13, 2004 http://www.workingforchange.com/article.cfm?itemid=17861 Last Thursday, when the Russian cabinet moved to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, international leaders called it t

[Biofuel] Kyoto Oct 22?

2004-10-14 Thread MH
Russian Parliament to Ratify Kyoto Oct. 22 14 Oct 2004 14:36 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 14:36 MSK MosNews http://www.mosnews.com/money/2004/10/14/kyotodate.shtml A key committee of the Russian State Duma recommended Thursday that it ratify the Kyoto Protocol on climate change on Oct. 22. ãT

[Biofuel] Kyoto protocol is just the beginning

2004-10-07 Thread MH
Kyoto protocol is just the beginning Fred Pearce 06 Oct 2004 http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns6494 It has been a long wait since the Kyoto protocol was signed in the early hours of 11 December 1997. Next year, if Russia sticks to the commitment it made last week, the t

Re: [biofuel] Kyoto Accord holds promise for ethanol

2002-10-30 Thread Keith Addison
Thanks for the refs. However... >Most flexible fuel equipped vehicles on the road are minivans, SUVs, >and trucks, NOT cars. These vehicles can burn gasoline or renewable >ethanol (E85) fuel interchangeably. However their owners are often >unaware of this capability. Most trucks are diesels.

[biofuel] Kyoto Accord holds promise for ethanol

2002-10-30 Thread womplex_oo1
Kyoto Commitment Holds Promise for Ethanol The [Canadian] Prime Minister's recent declaration at the Johannesburg Summit on Sustainability that he intends to ratify the Kyoto protocol can only be good news for ethanol. "Support for ethanol as been building in Ottawa and around the country for

  1   2   >