This spot:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=14.589184mlon=121.071306zoom=18layers=B000FTF
allows you to take left and right turns but not u-turns
According to this document,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turn_restrictions
relation turn restrictions should have 3 members (from, to, via)
UPDATE. Only two islands from the top ten need some coasty coastline love.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Philippines/Coastline_Corrections
Anyone working on Negros and Mainland Mindanao?
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:49 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
yes,
Oops. Sorry. Thanks for the heads up, Maning!
On Jun 15, 2010, at 10:51 AM, maning sambale wrote:
@ carlos, we have limited space for messages in the talk-ph list.
Forwarding your message to the list. I like the old looks of vespa.
:)
Subject: GPS on a Vespa PX150
Just want to share:
There should be one via: the bit of road connecting the to and from. So
Lanuza should be split here. No need to add nodes as via.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:07 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:
This spot:
Maning, BTW, only_left_turn means just that: you can only turn left from the
from road. Which means that you can't even go straight! So the two
only_left_turn relations at the Lanuza-Ortigas intersection is wrong.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.comwrote:
I should say weekly in my case, but most of the time I update if I am
going out the next day. I also update when I've made any changes.
On Wednesday, 16 June, 2010 10:29 AM, maning sambale wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Eugene Alvin Villarsea...@gmail.com wrote:
You should expect
I think Rally can make sense of this since he probably passes by this area
fairly frequently.
:-)
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 12:27 PM, tutubi
tut...@backpackingphilippines.comwrote:
hi all,
been testing routing in Cainta and noticed errors...
Ortigas Avenue extension, from the foot of Rosario
That's great! It's a useful way to present OSM and it demonstrates
growing popularity
I fully agree. I think we should ask them if we even can name them on the
OpenStreetMap web site as reference case (and we might kindly ask them at
the same time to put the attribution somemore in the
Tim McNamara wrote:
[stuff about scope of share-alike]
[stuff about whether a share-alike or an attribution-only licence is
better]
Hello Tim; you are new here, I think (and welcome!). There is a bit of prior
discussion on this. About five years' worth, in fact. :)
If you'd like to look
Richard Weait wrote:
Sent: 16 June 2010 8:42 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Frank Sautter
openstreet...@sautter.com wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sent: 16 June 2010 6:22 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
Hi,
Frank Sautter wrote:
WolframAlpha uses OpenStreetMap data
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Berlin
Interesting, they seem to have their own rendering
16.06.2010 18:38, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it might be OK or not, but generally we explain in our wiki how we
like to be attributed in the web-context, that is supplying cc-by-sa
linked to creative commons and Openstreetmap, not too difficult, is
it?
Apparently it is counter-intuitive at
So I've had phone and email chats with stephen wolfram about everything they're
doing because incidentally I had an internship there a decade ago.
They love OSM. What's good is we're at a nice tipping point with many who want
to use OSM and help it succeed but are having trouble figuring out
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
There is a slight contradiction here though because the other thing I hear
a lot is they'd like to try something with us but keep it quiet - i.e. try
something small, but that's extremely hard with an open community.
I find
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:16 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
There is a slight contradiction here though because the other thing I hear
a lot is they'd like to try something with us but keep it quiet - i.e. try
While updating the streets in my neighborhood (mostly correcting misaligned
TIGER imports to match Yahoo's aerial views), I found a short street that needs
to be removed from the map. It has been closed to traffic for decades, and the
pavement has now been removed and replaced by a commercial
shift+backspace/delete. This is to prevent you hitting delete and deleting the
way accidentally.
Shaun
On 17 Jun 2010, at 22:34, John F. Eldredge wrote:
While updating the streets in my neighborhood (mostly correcting misaligned
TIGER imports to match Yahoo's aerial views), I found a short
John F. Eldredge wrote:
How can I remove this short and no-longer-existing street using Potlatch?
Some would like to see it kept and marked historical, but deleting ways
in Potlatch is easy: select the way, then select an end node and delete
until all way nodes are gone (shared nodes in
Steve,
They would like to link to us directly but don't think a) we can
handle the load and b) don't think it would be a good user experience
to dump people on to osm.org, what with the site design.
To paraphrase (not specifically Wolfram, but the unnamed other megacorps
you're chatting
[ sent from wrong account first time.. apologies if this shows up twice ]
I'm finding that XAPI is returning multiple versions of the same
object (nodes and
ways at least) which is makes it impossible to use osmosis to create
geometries, and
prevents the creation of keys in the simple postGIS
I think you're concentrating on tiles, but that's not really the bottleneck I
would jump on first.
The conversation goes like this:
steve we have 300 million people a day look at our site and we would like to
send their edits and feedback to OSM
Really it's the API we're talking about. Tiles
Well let me take that back a bit - actually even doing some very simple cleanup
of the interface and having a feedback mechanism *at all* would be a good first
step, as people jumped on my recent OGD post in the comments:
http://opengeodata.org/the-importance-of-timing-to-feedback
On
OTRS?
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:30 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Well let me take that back a bit - actually even doing some very simple
cleanup of the interface and having a feedback mechanism *at all* would be a
good first step, as people jumped on my recent OGD post in the comments:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Anthony wrote:
OTRS?
huh?
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:30 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Well let me take that back a bit - actually even doing some very simple
cleanup of the interface and having a feedback mechanism *at all* would be a
good first
Do we really have the mapping capacity (in person-hours and server hardware)
to handle 300M people a day providing feedback?
I mean we could point people to openstreetbugs, but it's already full up
because people are more interested in mapping the areas they are interested
in, not necessarily
OTRS = http://otrs.org/ (Open Source Ticket Request System)
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:50 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Anthony wrote:
OTRS?
huh?
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:30 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Well let me take that back a bit -
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:55 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Do we really have the mapping capacity (in person-hours and server hardware)
to handle 300M people a day providing feedback?
that's kind of the point
lets say you were a very large firm and you wanted to scale OSM to that level,
how would you do
On 18 June 2010 11:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
But the sad thing is it applies for much lower numbers too - if you wanted to
scale to 1 million / day editors let's say.
I'm wondering if bulk uploaders are already hitting these kinds of
numbers, lets assume the bulk unloaders all went
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:50 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Anthony wrote:
OTRS?
huh?
Does anyone think it would be a good idea to set up OTRS for OSM?
If your question was what OTRS is, http://lmgtfy.com/?q=otrs
It's the system that Wikimedia uses
I think we can do better
http://customer.otrs.org/otrs/customer.pl
is a horrible interface. I'd like something that works like uservoice.com but
is integrated in to the rails port (because tom says so). I actually think we
should go with uservoice.com, it's all set up and would take 5
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:27 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:50 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:45 PM, Anthony wrote:
OTRS?
huh?
Does anyone think it would be a good idea to set up OTRS for OSM?
If your question was what OTRS is,
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:12 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 18 June 2010 11:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
But the sad thing is it applies for much lower numbers too - if you wanted
to scale to 1 million / day editors let's say.
I'm wondering if bulk uploaders are already hitting these kinds
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:31 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I think we can do better
Well then, feel free.
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:32 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:27 PM, Anthony wrote:
I'd expect the company sending all that feedback at us to
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:31 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I think we can do better
http://customer.otrs.org/otrs/customer.pl
is a horrible interface. I'd like something that works like uservoice.combut
is integrated in to the rails port (because tom says so). I actually
Just to chime in on the topic...
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
To paraphrase (not specifically Wolfram, but the unnamed other megacorps
you're chatting with):
1. they'd like to link to us directly but our infrastrucutre is too weak;
2. they would not want to give us a
On Jun 17, 2010, at 8:50 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:31 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I think we can do better
Well then, feel free.
that's a valid point but a nauseatingly pithy one when overused in response to
simple comments.
Yeah that's Fredericks point:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 9:08 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:31 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I think we can do better
http://customer.otrs.org/otrs/customer.pl
is a horrible interface. I'd like something that works like uservoice.com but
is integrated in to
On Jun 17, 2010, at 9:22 PM, Ben Last wrote:
Just to chime in on the topic...
On Jun 17, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
To paraphrase (not specifically Wolfram, but the unnamed other megacorps
you're chatting with):
1. they'd like to link to us directly but our infrastrucutre
On 18 June 2010 11:49, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
That's super interesting though - can you give a deep feel for what the
volume and content of those emails is?
Generally hey, my street's not in the right suburb, or hey, why isn't my
street shown?, or How come your address search
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Ben Last wrote:
On 18 June 2010 11:49, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
That's super interesting though - can you give a deep feel for what the
volume and content of those emails is?
Generally hey, my street's not in the right suburb
well at least this one
On 18 June 2010 12:19, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Ben Last wrote:
Generally hey, my street's not in the right suburb
well at least this one is what I want to capture, super simply, and have a
queue to be fixed. Right now we don't capture it _at all_ and
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Ben Last wrote:
On 18 June 2010 12:19, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:11 PM, Ben Last wrote:
Generally hey, my street's not in the right suburb
well at least this one is what I want to capture, super simply, and have a
queue to be
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:46 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
that's a matter of opinion, any reasonable person I've ever met would
prefer uservoice to trac or otrs or whatever.
For what? From a glance at the two, OTRS and uservoice don't even seem to
be in the same category.
The two
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Anthony wrote:
Anyway, if your point in this thread is just defending yourself against what
you see as an attack from Frederick, feel free to ignore this. But if you'd
like some ideas on how to create a system to allow OSM users to easily get
feedback quickly
On 18 June 2010 12:32, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Ben Last wrote:
Well, fixing it isn't trivial, since there may be a bunch of reasons why
it's wrong (or it may not actually be wrong!). We could store these and
forward to OSM, but as has been mentioned,
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:40 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Anthony wrote:
Anyway, if your point in this thread is just defending yourself against
what you see as an attack from Frederick, feel free to ignore this. But if
you'd like some ideas on how to
random question that came up on IRC - are the timezones mapped in OSM?
Steve
stevecoast.com
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:46 PM, Ben Last wrote:
On 18 June 2010 12:32, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:28 PM, Ben Last wrote:
Well, fixing it isn't trivial, since there may be a bunch of reasons why
it's wrong (or it may not actually be wrong!). We could store these
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:47 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:40 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2010, at 10:36 PM, Anthony wrote:
Anyway, if your point in this thread is just defending yourself against
what you see as an attack from Frederick, feel free to
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 12:54 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
OTRS is a horrible system, whereas uservoice is easypeasy.
From whose perspective? Send an email, wait 3 minutes and 42 seconds,
receive a response that your issue has been resolved and thanking you for
your report. That's my
On 17/06/10 15:48, John Smith wrote:
I knew someone had brought it up in the past, but I'm wondering if we
could map it as an area rather than a line?
Arguably the best approach would be to mark the wilderness area as such,
and perhaps show any tracks stopping at the boundaries.
Others may
On 17 June 2010 15:59, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
On 17/06/10 15:48, John Smith wrote:
I knew someone had brought it up in the past, but I'm wondering if we
could map it as an area rather than a line?
Arguably the best approach would be to mark the wilderness area as such, and
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, you wrote:
3. Examples: Beaudesert Drumley Street
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/774393256
or: Hay Airport
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/774393252
* Completely new site; BoM data lists WMO:id which doesn't occur
in any
Do you have
any suggestions on how contours should be marked? eg every
10m elevation, or 5 or 50 or ... ?
In regard to contours, the maps from Contours Australia work
really well. For Garmin devices, they can be downloaded concurrently
with OSM maps. I have been using them in this way
On 17/06/2010 11:30 AM, John Smith wrote:
On Thu, June 17, 2010 4:27 pm, tom.bren...@ampcapital.com wrote:
Do you have any suggestions on how contours should be marked? eg
every 10m elevation, or 5 or 50 or ... ?
Depends on the scale of the map. 1:25000 maps are typically rendered
with 10m or
On 17/06/2010 3:46 PM, John Henderson wrote:
I may have raised this issue in the past. Walking tracks are never
signposted or otherwise marked through declared wilderness areas. This
includes some sections of the Australian Alps Walking Track. Maps
should not show tracks in those specific
On 17 June 2010 22:38, Richard Colless fire...@ar.com.au wrote:
In regard to contours, the maps from Contours Australia work really well.
For Garmin devices, they can be downloaded concurrently with OSM maps. I
have been using them in this way in my Etrex for about 6 months now.
I've imported
On 17 June 2010 23:08, Tom Brennan webs...@ozultimate.com wrote:
Depends on the scale of the map. 1:25000 maps are typically rendered
with 10m or 20m contours. Every 5th or 10th contour should be in bold.
I'm used to mapnik zoom levels, I'll have to figure out what 1:25000
represents, although
On 17/06/2010 11:25 PM, John Smith wrote:
navigation are: - tracks - render as dashed black line
Can you put this in OSM terms?
What do you mean by OSM terms (I'm a bit of a newbie)
something like highway=track, grade=3 ?
OK
- highway=path - dashed black line
- highway=track+car=no - long
On 18 June 2010 00:18, Tom Brennan webs...@ozultimate.com wrote:
No they haven't. Area is approx lat=-33.9753lon=150.1336 but it's not a
great area to start with. Geographic items are difficult to map without
good quality aerial photography, which we don't have for that area
(Kanangra).
On 17/06/10 23:13, Tom Brennan wrote:
Not always true. For example, from the Plan of Management for Kanangra
Boyd National Park
Existing walking tracks on the Kanangra Tops within the wilderness (as
indicated on the map on the central pages of this plan) will be retained
and managed to
Pro: Stop/Station/Wharf locations in compatible licence
Con: Licence not compatible with OSM for very much longer :
-- Forwarded message --
From: Noam Ben Haim noa...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:09 AM
Subject: [transit-developers] NSW Public Transport changes license
From a local govt point of view these are different to both rural and
residential.
Normally the lot size would be too small to make a living from.
A hobby farm could have a rural zoning.
- Ben.
Sent from my HTC
-Original Message-
From: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
Sent:
Anyone know if this has any relationship to OSM (i.e, is partly derived from
OSM, or has been used as a basis for OSM)?
http://www.naturalearthdata.com/
Cheers
b
--
Ben Last
Development Manager (HyperWeb)
NearMap Pty Ltd
___
Talk-au mailing list
I've started building up some map layers, so far I have a base layer,
as well as shifting contours to their own layer, but only for select
areas due to lack of hdd space, so far only Bris and Syd.
http://maps.bigtincan.com/?z=17ll=-26.372,152.838layer=BFFFTFF
From there I plan to start
Cool,
No idea about the legals. ... it looks like it's Public Domain...
But i think it does help with the GroundTruthPlanet Contour Garmin
Maps than im making :)
As well as serves as the good grid for the WikiMAP Books that im working on.
Great Find,
Cheers,
Sam
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:24
bem, pode-se utilizar a tag maxspeed em aplicações de roteamento tb...
Me preocupo com a questão estética - em níveis de zomm médio, fica
meio esquisito uma trunk colada numa motorway...
2010/6/17 Diogo W Nunes diogownunes2...@yahoo.com.br:
Olá Pessoal,
Como sabem, estou envolvido no projeto
Eu acredito que tanto a expressa como a central deveriam ser mapeadas como
motorway, porque elas tem capacidade similar. Creio que em muitos pontos
elas tem o mesmo número de faixas e velocidade iguais. Ja a local eu tenho
dúvida entre trunk e primary, porque tem uma capacidade bem menor do que as
Olá pessoal,
O FISL está chegando, alguns de nós já confirmaram presença no evento e
já enviamos uma palestra sobre o projeto. Se alguém tiver alguma ideia
pra um evento comunitário do projeto durante o FISL, a hora é essa:
Philip Gillißen schrieb:
Hallo zusammen!
Da Litfaßsäulen einen guten Orientierungspunkt bieten, wollte ich diese
auch in der Karte erfassen.
Nur finde ich leider keine Information dazu in dieser Liste oder im Wiki.
Wäre schon, wenn mir einer einen Tipp dazu geben könnte.
Hallo,
ich
Am 17.06.2010 08:54, schrieb bkmap:
ich denke eine Litfaßsäule kann man nach dem vorgeschlagenen Schema in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Proposed_features/information
erfassen, wenn man es etwas erweitert.
z.B.:
information=board
board_type=advertising_column
oder
Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 21:45:55 schrieb Martin Simon:
Das gute ist eigentlich, daß die Leute, die path so verwenden (für
neutrale Pfade in Wald und Flur) eigentlich nichts falsch machen, da
diese Verwendung auch von path abgedeckt ist.
Leider gibt es fuer Untergruende so derartig viele
hi !
es soll ein navi mit sprache beschafft werden - die routenführung des
garmin gpsmap kommt nicht so gut an.
kann einer von euch eines empfehlen was später vielleicht auch mit osm
genutzt werden kann - am besten wäre die nutzung des gelieferten systems
und von osm in einer installation
Hallo,
zwei Fragen hätte ich noch:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:28:02PM +0200, Thomas Ineichen wrote:
http://access.t-i.ch/
benutzte Farben:
blau: Radweg
türkis: Radfahrstreifen
grün: Radfahren erlaubt
hellgrün: Tempo 30
Inwiefern ist die Angabe von Tempo 30 relevant für's
Am 17.06.2010 10:24, schrieb o...@tappenbeck.net:
hi !
es soll ein navi mit sprache beschafft werden - die routenführung des
garmin gpsmap kommt nicht so gut an.
kann einer von euch eines empfehlen was später vielleicht auch mit osm
genutzt werden kann - am besten wäre die nutzung des
Jedenfalls ist es angeraten, kein amenity dafür zu nehmen, weil man so
z.B. auch Kombinationen mit Toilettentags bauen kann.
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Sebastian Hohmann schrieb:
Martin Simon schrieb:
Am 16. Juni 2010 00:15 schrieb Sebastian Hohmann m...@s-hohmann.de:
Thomas Ineichen schrieb:
Ich kenne Fahrradstrassen nicht, aber laut Internet[1] dürfen andere
Fahrzeuge dort erst fahren, wenn sie explizit erlaubt sind.
Am 17. Juni 2010 10:13 schrieb Bernd Wurst be...@bwurst.org:
Momentan ist also ein Trampelpfad im Wald, auf dem man (im Sommer) theoretisch
auch mit nem Fahrrad durch kann nicht zu unterscheiden von einem asphaltierten
Weg, der vielleicht kein blaues Schild bekommen hat aber dennoch ein prima
Christian chr_bra...@gmx.de wrote:
Es wird z.B. highway=path/cycleway bicycle=designated vorgeschlagen.So
würde normale ausgewiesene Radwege taggen. Damit ist mir der Unterschied
zur Fahrradstraße nicht vorhanden. Das nur über traffic_sign zu regeln
finde ich nicht schön.
Nein das ist
o...@tappenbeck.net o...@tappenbeck.net wrote:
kann einer von euch eines empfehlen was später vielleicht auch mit osm
genutzt werden kann - am besten wäre die nutzung des gelieferten systems
und von osm in einer installation (umschaltmöglichkeit).
Derzeit sind AFAIK die Navigationsgeräte
Guten Tag Ulf Lamping,
am Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2010 um 09:25 schrieben Sie:
Das finde ich jetzt nicht so gut. Ich würde eigentlich schon gerne einen
klaren Unterschied zwischen touristischen Informationen und einfacher
Werbung haben.
Zitat: Der Schlüssel tourism=information beschreibt
Guten Tag Andrea Hecker,
am Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2010 um 22:37 schrieben Sie:
My name is Andrea Hecker and I am a student at the Justus-Liebig-
University of Giessen/ Germany. I am currently writing on my diploma
Lernt man da kein Deutsch?
Christzian
Meine Idee wäre sowas wie:
advertising=column (oder auch advertising=advertising_column)
bzw.für Plakatwände
advertising=board (oder auch advertising=billboard)
Hört sich gut an. Wäre dann ein neues Tag, das man auch für ähnliche
Objekte benutzen kann.
Denkbar wäre dann auch solche
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:49:50AM +0200, Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
hi !
ich erweitere meine frage noch einmal...
es gibt ja verschiedene software für das routing auf den
sprachgesteuerten geräten - navit etc.
Navit ist von der routenberechnung noch meilenweit von den ergebnissen
der Garmin
Hallo Andreas,
Inwiefern ist die Angabe von Tempo 30 relevant für's Fahrradfahren.
Weil es sich in einer Tempo-30-Zone im Allgemeinen angenehmer fährt?
(Hier in der Schweiz kommt Tempo 30 fast ausschliesslich als Zone vor;
in Deutschland gibt es hingegen auch Primaries, welche mit '30' be-
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:01:26PM +0200, Thomas Ineichen wrote:
Weil es sich in einer Tempo-30-Zone im Allgemeinen angenehmer fährt?
(Hier in der Schweiz kommt Tempo 30 fast ausschliesslich als Zone vor;
in Deutschland gibt es hingegen auch Primaries, welche mit '30' be-
schildert sind.
Am 17. Juni 2010 11:02 schrieb Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de:
living_street war IMo ein Unfall. Das sind in 99,9% der Falle ganz normale
residential Roads mit speziellen Verkehrsvorschriften. Auch hier wäre es IMO
besser gewesen einen speziellen Zusatztag zu erfinden.
+1
Genau wie
Am 17.06.2010 11:40, schrieb Florian Lohoff:
[...]
Insgesamt empfinde ich Navit als reichlich tot auch wenn es die am weitest
gediehene Navi loesung ist ...
Letzte Woche auf dem Linuxtag habe ich einen anderen Eindruck gewonnen.
Ich selber nutze Navit bisher nicht, aber das forgeführte
Hallo,
Jochen Topf schrieb:
Wenn man zweimal das gleiche Schild anklickt, ist es 2mal in der Auswahl.
Das könntest Du noch abfangen.
Eigentlich hatte ich das schon, aber offenbar ist das durch eine
Änderung wieder ausgehebelt worden.
Wäre es nicht sinnvoll, das Anclicken als
Am 17. Juni 2010 10:13 schrieb Bernd Wurst be...@bwurst.org:
Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 21:45:55 schrieb Martin Simon:
Das gute ist eigentlich, daß die Leute, die path so verwenden (für
neutrale Pfade in Wald und Flur) eigentlich nichts falsch machen, da
diese Verwendung auch von path abgedeckt
Am Donnerstag 17 Juni 2010, 13:09:53 schrieb Martin Simon:
Als Nutzer der Daten interessiert mich doch primaer, wo ich mit z.B.
Fahrrad mit Anhaenger fahren kann. Bisher habe ich da beim Mappen die
(oft nicht vorhandenen) Schilder nur sekundaer genutzt und primaer auf
die Nutzbarkeit
Detlev Zundel schrieb:
Hallo,
Jochen Topf schrieb:
Wenn man zweimal das gleiche Schild anklickt, ist es 2mal in der Auswahl.
Das könntest Du noch abfangen.
Eigentlich hatte ich das schon, aber offenbar ist das durch eine
Änderung wieder ausgehebelt worden.
Wäre es nicht sinnvoll, das
Ist man irgendwie unnormal, wenn man nicht versteht, was das eigentlich
mit OSM zu tun haben soll?
Alex
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
On 17.06.2010 14:15, Alexander Matheisen wrote:
Ist man irgendwie unnormal, wenn man nicht versteht, was das eigentlich
mit OSM zu tun haben soll?
Alex
Es scheint Personen zu geben, die nicht wissen was Spam ist, und meinen
zu schreiben ist kein Spam würde ausreichen damit es kein
Am Donnerstag, den 17.06.2010, 14:31 +0200 schrieb Felix Hartmann:
On 17.06.2010 14:15, Alexander Matheisen wrote:
Ist man irgendwie unnormal, wenn man nicht versteht, was das eigentlich
mit OSM zu tun haben soll?
Alex
Es scheint Personen zu geben, die nicht wissen was Spam
Hallo,
nur gut, dass es immer wieder mal ein Thema gibt, bei dem man eine
highway=cycleway oder higway=path - Diskussion lostreten kann.
Es gab Abstimmungen und es gibt Wiki-Seiten dazu. Aber trotzdem hier mal
meine Meinung:
Momentan ist also ein Trampelpfad im Wald, auf dem man (im Sommer)
Meine Idee wäre sowas wie:
advertising=column (oder auch advertising=advertising_column)
In Düsseldorf schon vielfach so gemapt, da insbesondere interessant wegen der
Kunst obendrauf. Passt auch zu
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advertising_column. Allerdings haben die
Düsseldorfer
Alexander Matheisen alexandermathei...@ish.de wrote:
Irgendwie wirkte es mir zu logisch für Spam
Spam zeichnet sich nicht durch logisch oder unlogisch aus.
Spam ist für mich eine umgangssprachliche Bezeichnung für UBE und genau
darum handelt es sich offensichtlich:
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de wrote:
Insgesamt empfinde ich Navit als reichlich tot auch wenn es die am weitest
gediehene Navi loesung ist ...
Die hatten auf dem Linuxtag einen Stand. Sah eigentlich ganz lebendig aus.
Sven
--
Der wichtigste Aspekt, den Sie vor der Entscheidung für ein Open
Moin
Jetzt sehe ich mit grossem Schrecken, dass neue Wege in Wald und Flur
irgendwie grundsaetzlich als path getagged sind, in der Karte ist alles nur
noch schwarz gestrichelt und ich weiss gar nicht mehr wo man was darf. Hier
hab ich noch den Lokal-Bonus dass ich mir sicher bin dass ich alle
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
