Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving FIXME=* to fixme=*

2018-07-02 Thread James
are there any overlap with FIXME and fixme as in an object tagged with both? Is it possible or the osm API considers them the same(case insensitive)? If there are no overlaps I dont see an issue tagging this the proper way On Mon, Jul 2, 2018, 1:44 PM Mateusz Konieczny, wrote: > fixme tag is a

Re: [OSM-talk] About OSM social implications and what can/should be displayed on the map (or not)

2018-06-29 Thread James
Not showing things on map to me is a form of censorship. I.E if a study finds that the sight of trees triggers suicide by hanging do we start removing all tree icons? This sets a precedent to what can and can't be displayed on map. There are some disputed boarders that are displayed differently

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto design

2018-06-29 Thread James
But they say CartoCSS is dead, what is the intended replacement(if it's dead it's because there's a newer better thing?)? just a data structure that contains data/styling? On Fri, Jun 29, 2018, 6:49 AM Paul Norman, wrote: > On 2018-06-29 2:48 AM, James wrote: > > So what is intended t

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto design

2018-06-29 Thread James
So what is intended to replace CartoCSS? Vector tiles? On Fri, Jun 29, 2018, 5:42 AM Frederik Ramm, wrote: > Hi, > >without going into the finer details, I'd like to offer an outsider's > view of OSM Carto development. > > When Andy first created OSM Carto, he set out a road map that has

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

2018-06-08 Thread James
I don't see a problem with this as the major concerns: big edit boundaries, what does it affect? are taken care of by documentation if building=building is not or was not a wiki approved way of tagging, this seems more on the side of linting osm tags than it does a "mass blind edit"/import On

Re: [Talk-transit] [Imports] [OSM-talk] Automated edit for bus lines in Paris area

2018-06-05 Thread James
Have you taken a look at this project? https://github.com/CUTR-at-USF/gtfs-osm-sync On Tue, Jun 5, 2018, 6:36 AM Johnparis, wrote: > Hi, Stefan, two steps required. The second is a lot easier than the first. > > 1) curate a database of exiting nodes. Choosing a unique key usually isn't >

Re: [OSM-talk] [Imports] Automated edit for bus lines in Paris area

2018-06-05 Thread James
Have you taken a look at this project? https://github.com/CUTR-at-USF/gtfs-osm-sync On Tue, Jun 5, 2018, 6:36 AM Johnparis, wrote: > Hi, Stefan, two steps required. The second is a lot easier than the first. > > 1) curate a database of exiting nodes. Choosing a unique key usually isn't >

Re: [OSM-talk] Remote Sensing / DOP / DIY people

2018-06-03 Thread James
: > > > Am 02.06.2018 um 00:45 schrieb James: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kite_aerial_photography#Picavet_suspension > > When I was looking at RC planes, the one that could hold a quality > camera+fly for for a relatively long time is the skywalker X8(~200$ USD) + > batter

Re: [OSM-talk] Remote Sensing / DOP / DIY people

2018-06-02 Thread James
ld be interesting to examine the > faisability to develop such a project including both hardware and open > source software. > > > Pierre > > > Le vendredi 1 juin 2018 17 h 39 min 06 s HAE, James > a écrit : > > > cheaper and simpler would be a kite and a picav

Re: [OSM-talk] Remote Sensing / DOP / DIY people

2018-06-02 Thread James
Still cant beat ~50$ for a good kite pieces of string and a block of wood On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 4:19 AM Florian Lohoff, wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:12:49PM -0400, James wrote: > > cheaper and simpler would be a kite and a picavet system. I was looking > > into building

Re: [OSM-talk] Remote Sensing / DOP / DIY people

2018-06-01 Thread James
cheaper and simpler would be a kite and a picavet system. I was looking into building a FPV, but just getting it to fly in a pattern gets expensive quickly(even building from scratch) On Thu, May 31, 2018, 9:01 PM Florian Lohoff, wrote: > > Hi, > is there a Mailinglist for the Technical aspects

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020i and Wikidata

2018-06-01 Thread James
There's already an initiative to add wiki data to osm there's a tool that helps you find missing wikidata items in a location where you can validate if they are correctly matched or not: https://osm.wikidata.link/ On Thu, May 31, 2018, 5:50 PM Jonathan Brown, wrote: > Has anyone thought of

Re: [OSM-talk] Wikimedia Maps deployment

2018-05-03 Thread James
also i believe a multi-lingual map will require vector tiles to be dynamic, which is being worked on as well On Thu, May 3, 2018, 3:36 AM Eugene Alvin Villar, wrote: > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 2:50 PM, Daniel Koć wrote: > >> It's also good that they were able to

Re: [Talk-ca] A new available source of trail data in the Nanaimo area

2018-05-02 Thread James
Hopefully the names of said trails are not so vulgar as past experiences. If they have surveyed all of the trails themselves and are making the data available, I don't see an issue with using it(other than it being grossly inacurate) On Wed, May 2, 2018, 9:19 PM Doug Hembry,

Re: [OSM-talk] How INSPIRE data are sold in your countries

2018-05-02 Thread James
Canada: Canvec data is free from NRCan On Wed, May 2, 2018, 11:13 AM Honza Cibulka, wrote: > Hello, > > I am in the middle of court proceedings related to prices which Czech > state GIS authority asks for INSPIRE data (for context, it´s about hundreds > of thousands Euro for

Re: [Talk-ca] Question

2018-04-27 Thread James
Canada Post also regularly changes Postal Code locations to remain the master of the postal codes and be able to resell their 5000$/year database( https://www.canadapost.ca/cpo/mc/assets/pdf/business/pc_latLong_specs_en.pdf). They have also sued geocoder.ca for collecting user postal codes, which

Re: [OSM-talk] How do you mapping gender neutral toilets? What should the unisex tag mean?

2018-04-24 Thread James
not only that, bit generally in North America, men's washrooms are usually dirtier than woamns washrooms On Tue, Apr 24, 2018, 2:46 PM Kathleen Lu, wrote: > I think the most likely application may be the other way around, where > transgender individuals concerned about

Re: [Talk-us] Gravel roads and surface tags in the US

2018-04-19 Thread James Umbanhowar
in my area. I don't get the gravel being 4-8 cm, that seems a wikierror. James On Wed, 2018-04-18 at 17:19 -0500, Toby Murray wrote: > I recently bought a gravel bicycle to ride on the many gravel roads > in > Kansas. Like this one: > https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=nYO4JI46L0SWzNA

Re: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #403 2018-04-03-2018-04-09

2018-04-13 Thread James
the English page is in spanish for some reason.. On Fri, Apr 13, 2018, 1:59 PM weeklyteam, wrote: > The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 403, > is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all > things happening in the openstreetmap world: > >

Re: [Talk-ca] DigitalGlobe building footprints for sale in Canada

2018-04-11 Thread James
Digital Globe has been doing it for a while. They put machine learning on their imagery and can extract buildings quite quickly and accurately On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, 12:24 PM Bernie Connors, wrote: > >

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] ODbL text

2018-04-08 Thread James
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 8:13 AM Simon Poole, <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > > > Am 08.04.2018 um 13:30 schrieb James: > > why not host it on the osmf website? > > > Because we don't own the domain (which is what most references to the > actual text use) and are not th

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] ODbL text

2018-04-08 Thread James
why not host it on the osmf website? On Sun, Apr 8, 2018, 5:46 AM Simon Poole, wrote: > Currently I'm pointing to > http://web.archive.org/web/20180317184051/https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/ > however as the opendatacommons.org links are all over the place that > isn't

Re: [Talk-ca] Trans-Canada Highway research

2018-03-26 Thread James
to Ontarians. > > --- > Kevin Farrugia > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 11:46 AM Viajero Perdido, < > viajero.perdido.spam.buc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 18-03-26 05:33 AM, talk-ca-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: >> > Message: 3 >> > Date: Mon,

Re: [Talk-ca] Trans-Canada Highway research

2018-03-26 Thread James
highway 417 should be tagged as highway 417 and not principally transcanada way as this is how it's known locally. It can be tagged in transcanada relation, but it's mainly known as the 417 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, 7:22 AM Olivia Robu - (p), wrote: > Hello, > > The Telenav

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 Calgary Challenges and Best Practices

2018-03-23 Thread James
tested on ff, same issue boundary box no longer shows On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 11:18 AM john whelan, <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > So firefox would be fine? > > Thanks John > > On 23 March 2018 at 11:12, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> depends if you

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 Calgary Challenges and Best Practices

2018-03-23 Thread James
hots of good and bad examples to > demonstrate good practices. James, will the TM2 issue affect our March 29 > mapathon? > > > > Jonathan > > > ___ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org >

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.9.0

2018-03-23 Thread James
You're welcome :) On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:45 AM Daniel Koć, wrote: > Dear all, > > Today, v4.9.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet (the default > stylesheet on the OSM website) has been released. Once changes are > deployed on the openstreetmap.org it will take couple of days

Re: [Talk-ca] Poorly drawn buildings #GEOG231-W18; #BC2020; #UCalgary-GEOG231; #BC2020-UCalgary

2018-03-22 Thread James
n Tuesday the Canada tasking manager did not show > boundaries in iD editor. We tested the HOT TM which worked fine (however, > they are using TM3, I guess). > > @James: Might this all have to do with Canada TM being based on TM2 which > might not work well with last changes to iD

Re: [OSM-talk] Vote cheating?

2018-03-16 Thread James
>> That is a different matter. This is about the possibility that on >>>> person makes multiple wiki accunts and use those to vote (thereby >>>> cheating the vote). >>>> >>>> I think it would be a good thing to check this. >>>> >>

Re: [OSM-talk] Vote cheating?

2018-03-16 Thread James
You could also argue the opposite way: Not everyone in OSM edits the wiki, thus probably doesnt have an account, thus to participate, they need to create an account to vote On Fri, Mar 16, 2018, 7:16 AM Selfish Seahorse, wrote: > Hi everyone > > I've remarked that

Re: [OSM-talk] Strava Cycling and Running Heatmap not working

2018-03-15 Thread James
403 is Forbidden Possibly due to api endpoint changes. On Thu, Mar 15, 2018, 3:34 PM Sérgio V., wrote: > Perhaps due to this update? > > "...we are eager to introduce new ways we are protecting that data and the > athletes who provide it:..." > > "...Roads and trails with

Re: [Talk-ca] Emergency Request for Tasking Manager Trainer

2018-03-09 Thread James
ver the work as it is done. Technical term is validation > basically it is to give feedback to help with the data quality side. > > Cheerio John > > On 9 March 2018 at 11:44, Jonathan Brown <jonab...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks, James. I added one building to proj

Re: [Talk-ca] Emergency Request for Tasking Manager Trainer

2018-03-09 Thread James
<brock_ba...@kprdsb.ca> <brock_ba...@kprdsb.ca>; Alasia, Alessandro > (STATCAN) <alessandro.ala...@canada.ca> > *Subject: *RE: [Talk-ca] Emergency Request for Tasking Manager Trainer > > > > I think Matthew or James are the people to talk to. I suspect it might

Re: [Talk-ca] Cleanup of addr:country, addr:province, addr:state

2018-03-09 Thread James
is addr:province even needed? province boundaries are pretty well defined and could be dropped On Mar 8, 2018 11:28 PM, "Matthew Darwin" wrote: > > So I've tidied up the addr:province/state tags, now using only > addr:province, leaving anything that would be generally

Re: [Talk-ca] Emergency Request for Tasking Manager Trainer

2018-03-08 Thread James
rpur in > Pakistan though), I am happy to help out too. > > For preparing the areas of interest (aoi) the project manager needs either > a geojson or a kml or a shapefile. If you want to draw on James' offer to > set up the tasking manager and just don't have the aoi as geojson,

Re: [Talk-ca] Emergency Request for Tasking Manager Trainer

2018-03-08 Thread James
Doesnt have to be precise, I just dont know those places. On Mar 8, 2018 2:28 PM, "Jonathan Brown" wrote: > do you have a geojson extent of the area you want to cover? > > > > - > > > > Rob Halko can answer that question for Durham Region, the priority area > for March

Re: [Talk-ca] Emergency Request for Tasking Manager Trainer

2018-03-08 Thread James
do you have a geojson extent of the area you want to cover? On Mar 8, 2018 2:06 PM, "Jonathan Brown" wrote: > If we could clone the http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/91 so that it > could be used to tag information for existing buildings in the regions of > Durham,

Re: [OSM-talk] Please do not re-use old node IDs

2018-03-06 Thread James
@Yves unfortunately would be hard to implement as reverting reuses/undeletes the object if I'm not mistaken. So someone could just undelete a node than move it to where they need to. On Mar 6, 2018 5:47 AM, "Yves" wrote: > Hi Frederik, > For my curiosity, is it a feature of

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM SPAM detector

2018-03-05 Thread James
most but not all cases: undiscussed imports get reverted and when they get the go ahead they would be marked as spam. Very bad way to train the dataset vs ground truthed spam identification. On Mar 5, 2018 9:50 AM, "Michał Brzozowski" wrote: Could we use something similar

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020i Mapathon Event

2018-03-01 Thread James
one impotant take away from past experiences is to tell them not to map the same element twice. For example, someone else maps it first, dont add it on top as well(duplicate item mapping) ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-ca] Manitoba buildings, addresses and high school work

2018-02-28 Thread James
urself > would be acceptable. > > There is an import process speak nicely to James and he may be kind enough > to handhold you through it. > > The LWG will give an opinion on the license but it could take some > considerable time to do so. > > The import needs to be approved by a the l

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names in Ontario

2018-02-26 Thread James
usually if its included in name its: Xyz Township not township of xyz On Feb 26, 2018 3:24 PM, "OSM Volunteer stevea" wrote: > Hi Matthew: > > You do fine work here, yet I have a concern about "Township." I don't > know if in Canada, a Township is a bit of an "odd

Re: [OSM-talk] Is this legal to what philly.com is doing?

2018-02-23 Thread James
-2018-02-dixon-384405-e-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-new-map-1200x800.png=006=dixon-384405-e-wp-content-uploads-2018-02-new-map=The%20new%20congressional%20map%20released%20Monday%20by%20the%20Pennsylvania%20Supreme%20Court . On Feb 22, 2018 11:06 PM, "James Mast" <rickmastfa...@hotma

[OSM-talk] Is this legal to what philly.com is doing?

2018-02-22 Thread James Mast
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/will-republicans-impeach-pennsylvania-supreme-court-justices-20180222.html (ignore what the article is about) Just happen to see a thumbnail and clicked on the article since I noticed the OSM base map. Nowhere that I can find does it give credit to

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread James
On 2/17/2018 11:01 AM, James wrote: > >> except it wouldnt be multiplatform and only run on windows 濫冷. Java is >> a better alternative as it's a popular language and is multiplatform. C/c++ >> is a bit more complicated and not everyone can contribute. >> > > That'

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread James
except it wouldnt be multiplatform and only run on windows 濫冷. Java is a better alternative as it's a popular language and is multiplatform. C/c++ is a bit more complicated and not everyone can contribute. On Feb 17, 2018 10:56 AM, "john whelan" wrote: > I think that

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

2018-02-16 Thread James
My favourite is Moose Factory. I think Canadian typonomy was the consesus last time we had the same subject come up On Feb 16, 2018 7:14 PM, "Matthew Darwin" wrote: > In my OSM map updates to remove of "City of" and similar prefixes from > locality names, I will not be

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

2018-02-16 Thread James
the only expanded version of the city name was in french, and on wikipedia: https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sault-Sainte-Marie_(Ontario) Maybe because people(English) have trouble spelling "Sainte"? On Feb 16, 2018 5:38 PM, "Tristan Anderson" wrote: > I'm going to

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

2018-02-12 Thread James
Checked for Toronto and Ottawa they do not have "City of" : http://www4.rncan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search?q=Toronto[]=985=O I agree with what Bernie said, unless it's the official name. It seems it's a classification. On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 9:02 PM, Bernie Connors

Re: [Talk-ca] Formatting of Municipality Names

2018-02-12 Thread James
i believe "city of" is redundant as its a classification vs a name. Would we say "village of maniwaki"? nope. On Feb 12, 2018 5:51 PM, "Matthew Darwin" wrote: > Hi, > > I am now reviewing the *addr**:city* tag. Seems we are not very > consistent how we use it. For

Re: [Talk-us] rayman 765

2018-02-10 Thread James Mast
Looks like he's also added a fictional city too, called Elktown. :/ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56099959 [https://www.openstreetmap.org/assets/osm_logo_256-cde84d7490f0863c7a0b0d0a420834ebd467c1214318167d0f9a39f25a44d6bd.png]

Re: [Talk-ca] Postal Code cleanup

2018-02-07 Thread James
Canapost uses A#A #A# Seeing as they were trying to copyright it's usage (see lawsuit vs geocode.ca) I think thats the format we should use On Feb 7, 2018 8:02 PM, "Matthew Darwin" wrote: Hi all, Below are the 10 top postal code formats in Canada as seen in

Re: [Talk-ca] Buildings in Montreal

2018-01-30 Thread James
ta is ready yet. > > Note to James from a technical point of view any suggestions? > > Thanks John > > On 30 January 2018 at 13:10, Pierre Choffet <p...@wanadoo.fr> wrote: > >> Le 30/01/2018 à 11:23, Charles Basenga Kiyanda a écrit : >> > What we're missing

Re: [Talk-ca] Buildings in Montreal

2018-01-30 Thread James
sorry, they do have buildings. but its combined with a bunch of other things in DWG format called "Cartographie de base" On Jan 30, 2018 8:34 AM, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: they seem to only have addresses and lidar. On Jan 30, 2018 8:30 AM, "john

Re: [Talk-ca] Buildings in Montreal

2018-01-30 Thread James
they seem to only have addresses and lidar. On Jan 30, 2018 8:30 AM, "john whelan" <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > But do they have a buildings outline file? > > Thanks John > > On 30 Jan 2018 7:52 am, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: [Talk-ca] Buildings in Montreal

2018-01-30 Thread James
I was looking at license on the montreal site and they even say for OSM to use their data: http://donnees.ville.montreal.qc.ca/portail/license/ (scroll down) On Jan 30, 2018 6:57 AM, "john whelan" wrote: > Since Montreal would appear to have an acceptable licence and

Re: [Talk-ca] Preferred phone number format

2018-01-28 Thread James
personally I prefer: RFC 3966/NANP pattern as its more commonly used for telephone numbers(less the country code(unless long distance). Especially in white pages(back in the day we had paper copies) On Jan 28, 2018 8:24 PM, "Matthew Darwin"

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 OD_tables wiki and project status

2018-01-28 Thread James
Jan 28, 2018 5:53 PM, "OSM Volunteer stevea" <stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote: On Jan 28, 2018, at 2:39 PM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > CC Attribution is compatible with explicit permission, so Gatineau and Montreal may remain on the list. Oh, how I sometimes

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 OD_tables wiki and project status

2018-01-28 Thread James
CC Attribution is compatible with explicit permission, so Gatineau and Montreal may remain on the list. On Jan 28, 2018 5:20 PM, "OSM Volunteer stevea" wrote: > On Jan 28, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: > > Steve A, > > I suspect

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 OD_tables wiki and project status

2018-01-28 Thread James
lus a few others by phone who had done something similar. Most of the enriching of OSM from Ottawa's Open Data came through their portal such as the GTFS file. Martin and James have done most of the work integrating what they could find. Once we had the license lined up then I understand the build

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 OD_tables wiki and project status

2018-01-28 Thread James
course. Also, can someone explain to me the > licensing issue? How do datasets released under the open government license > not meet the legal requirements of the OSM license? > > Then, On Jan 28, 2018, at 10:57 AM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > license is federal,

Re: [Talk-ca] BC2020 OD_tables wiki and project status

2018-01-28 Thread James
license is federal, cities must modify it to apply to municipal, thus creating new license On Jan 28, 2018 1:52 PM, "Jonathan Brown" wrote: > If we have a description of the scope of the work involved in updating the > BC2020 OD tables, I don’t mind trying to find some

Re: [Talk-ca] A message aimed more at Ottawa

2018-01-23 Thread James
All that documentation was produced by Cycle Ottawa data devision. So by cyclists for cyclists On Jan 23, 2018 6:30 PM, "john whelan" wrote: > The SOTM presentation was interesting. Especially the bit about the 5% > who would cycle anyway and these are often the people

Re: [Talk-ca] A message aimed more at Ottawa

2018-01-23 Thread James
There's also documentation that Ottawa is using(not final thats why its not on the wiki) with example pictures: https://github.com/osmottawa/OSM-Bike-Ottawa-Tagging-Guide/blob/master/README.md There are differences with respect to US bike pathes On Jan 23, 2018 4:10 PM, "Matthew Darwin"

Re: [OSM-talk] Standard map style contributions

2017-12-28 Thread James
Lack of time due to real life preoccupations? On Dec 28, 2017 8:45 AM, "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote: > If somebody tried contributing and missing documentation was what > stopped him/her - what was missing? > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2017 08:34:34 -0500

Re: [OSM-talk] Standard map style contributions

2017-12-28 Thread James
as they know what parts do what vs reading all of the project and guessing what parts do what. On Dec 28, 2017 8:25 AM, "Daniel Koć" <daniel@koć.pl> wrote: > W dniu 28.12.2017 o 14:04, James pisze: > >> not everyone knows lua scripting might be one of the major herdles &

Re: [OSM-talk] Standard map style contributions

2017-12-28 Thread James
not everyone knows lua scripting might be one of the major herdles On Dec 28, 2017 5:49 AM, "Daniel Koć" wrote: > Hi, > > We have a lot of tickets waiting for solving in osm-carto (almost 400) and > I'm interested how could we do it effectively. > > It's not realistic to expect

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM tagging validation lib

2017-12-24 Thread James
ID is javascript, JOSM is java. So right there I already see a intercompatibility issue On Dec 24, 2017 6:12 AM, "François Lacombe" wrote: > Hi > > Here is an idea I got regarding tagging validation in editors (iD, JOSM, > others). > Subsequently to wiki proposal

Re: [Talk-ca] A message aimed more at Ottawa

2017-12-23 Thread James
You mean like we've been doing for kitchissippi ward? http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/84 Other wards need same sort of tagging On Dec 23, 2017 8:24 AM, "john whelan" wrote: > Within weeklyosm there is a article on bikability. I am aware that some > mappers in Ottawa

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Streak: edit the map every day

2017-12-05 Thread James
Actually I find it great so far, one day it's buildings, one day it's adding an unmapped road, takes people out of their usual mapping rut and expands their breath of knowledge about osm(may have to use wiki to look how to tag things On Dec 5, 2017 5:52 AM, "Frederik Ramm"

Re: [Talk-ca] Ottawa street names

2017-12-04 Thread James
DES EPINETTES AVE is english. Des Epinettes Avenue. French is avenue Des Epinettes. Dont look hard for an Explaination why they keep the french article, we are talking about a city that has Forest instead of Fôrest. There's also Des Aubépines that keeps the é. On Dec 4, 2017 6:49 AM, "john

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM Streak: edit the map every day

2017-12-03 Thread James
Good idea, is it normal you get a "Error connecting to OSM API"? On Dec 3, 2017 5:22 PM, "Ilya Zverev" wrote: > Wow, that is an awesome project! I envy you students for having such > unusual OSM activities :) And thanks to you, now I know about the > backrest=* tag. Everyone

Re: [Talk-us] Highway exit renumbering

2017-11-28 Thread James Mast
old_ref=* That's what we used to document old refs here in PA when I-279 & I-376 got recently renumbered due to an extension of I-376 taking over part of I-279. Here's an example of this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/683643865

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

2017-11-25 Thread James
There's already a false positive button for that. Skip is for meh don't want to do that right now. On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Stefan Keller wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-11-24 22:18 GMT+01:00 Dave F : > > > > On 24/11/2017 07:59, joost schouppe

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

2017-11-24 Thread James
Yeah I'd like the skipped tasks to comeback eventually, sometimes I look at objects and its either too complicated to fix for my current state of mind or the imagery makes it hard but I'd like to get back to it eventually On Nov 24, 2017 3:04 AM, "joost schouppe" wrote:

Re: [OSM-talk] Effecting change in OpenStreetMap

2017-11-21 Thread James
I am a developer. I should not be expected to learn Psychology 101 to improve OpenStreetMap. Funny you should say that...I had to take Psychology 101 for my CS degree. I see why now. On Nov 21, 2017 12:02 PM, "Ilya Zverev" wrote: > Christoph Hormann wrote: > > Oh come on.

Re: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #382 2017-11-07-2017-11-13

2017-11-18 Thread James
Seriously this is what 2017 has become? A bunch of snowflakes argueing whoes feelings are hurt? Seriously grow up people, the world is not full of cupcakes and rainbows. "Yuri is perceived by many as unreasonable as before and tries to ignore all the unwritten rules in OSM." I was somewhat

Re: [OSM-talk] Serious JOSM performance degradation

2017-11-11 Thread James
have you tried with wireframe mode(ctrl+w)? On Nov 11, 2017 5:11 PM, "Jan Martinec" wrote: > You can download somewhat-recent JOSM versions from > https://josm.openstreetmap.de/download/ , I do see 12921 there. Also > josm-latest, which is the testing version (currently

Re: [Talk-ca] Disconnected addresses

2017-10-31 Thread James
not sure what that format is, but it's completely useless, need so much processing, might as well just fix them via OSMI On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Matthew Darwin wrote: > No ideas from me... I was doing the Ottawa area manually. It takes a > while because you need to

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

2017-10-28 Thread James
sity Mapathon >> >> I can make it work but mon-fri works better because the buses are easier. >> >> Cheerio John >> >> On 28 October 2017 at 10:54, Kent Jacobs <kent.jac...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Would Saturday afternoon (Nov. 18) work for everybody? &

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

2017-10-27 Thread James
landuse= man made and maintained natrual= it made itself(which is 99.9% of the time the case) On Oct 27, 2017 5:27 AM, "Dave F" wrote: > You appear to be differentiating based on size & location which, seeing > OSM's output is visual & geospatial seems unnecessary.

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

2017-10-26 Thread James
tuation, but if during the weekend we can > work around stuff. > > > On Thursday, October 26, 2017, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Setting a time would also be in order, but I imagine this has to be >> figured out based on availability of rooms >&g

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

2017-10-26 Thread James
Richcraft Hall is the nicest building on campus though.  If > anybody else is familiar with Carleton’s campus I’m open to location ideas. > > > > Kent > > > > *From:* Tracey P. Lauriault [mailto:tlaur...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* October 26, 2017 9:01 AM > *To:* John Marshall <

Re: [Talk-ca] Severed Dick

2017-10-26 Thread James
I've added a note to those trails saying that it's been discussed twice now and linked this email chain with the mail archive: Name as been discussed twice. Although vulgar, seems to be accurate. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2017-October/008145.html On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at

Re: [Talk-ca] Carleton University Mapathon

2017-10-26 Thread James
Hey Kent, I'd be glad to help out :) On Oct 26, 2017 12:51 AM, "Kent Jacobs" wrote: > Hello all! > > > > I am a Masters of Science student in the Geography department at Carleton > University studying Quality Assessment of OSM data for my thesis. I am also > currently

Re: [Talk-ca] Severed Dick

2017-10-25 Thread James
Mountain bikers are a crude lot" > > Corey > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 5:00 PM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> so I'm not crazy, I remember it being discussed as well...just couldnt >> find it in my emails or searching on google >> >>

Re: [Talk-ca] Severed Dick

2017-10-25 Thread James
so I'm not crazy, I remember it being discussed as well...just couldnt find it in my emails or searching on google On Oct 25, 2017 7:19 PM, "Bernie Connors" wrote: > I think if somebody did a search of the Talk-ca archives you will find > these trail names were

Re: [Talk-ca] Severed Dick

2017-10-25 Thread James
Atleast they censor it a bit: https://www.trailforks.com/trails/lower-cbuster/ https://www.trailforks.com/trails/c-buster/ https://www.trailforks.com/trails/severed-d/ On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:20 AM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well aparently they are the proper nam

Re: [Talk-ca] Severed Dick

2017-10-25 Thread James
Well aparently they are the proper names...http://nsmba.ca/trail-maps/ *sigh* On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:15 AM, James <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > I highly doubt those are real names, but then again we have towns like > this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1452579483 > &

Re: [Talk-ca] Severed Dick

2017-10-25 Thread James
I highly doubt those are real names, but then again we have towns like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1452579483 On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Hi, > >noticed a few funny trail names in this region near Vancouver: > >

Re: [Talk-ca] Planning mapathon @ McGill in OSM Geo Week

2017-10-25 Thread James
I think Pierre is a good contact for the local Montreal group. On Oct 24, 2017 11:02 PM, "Tim Elrick, Dr." wrote: > Hello OSMappers, > > > > I am Tim Elrick, heading the Geographic Information Centre at McGill. I am > involved with organizing a mapathon at McGill in

Re: [Talk-ca] Building Canada 2020 OSMGeoWeek Mapathons

2017-10-18 Thread James
Anything in New Brunswick will most likely have high resolution imagery as the goverment donated their imagery to ESRI world imagery. The praries (Northern alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba) have vary little mappers compared to the rest of the country, it would be fun for people to give them a

Re: [Talk-ca] COMS2200 Ottawa, Carleton University

2017-10-18 Thread James
master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ (or even your own hosted OSM > API) if you want to try an extensive test of "see what this looks like". > As James has already said, the main OSM site is constantly subject to fixes > and corrections by everyone - that's kind of the point :) >

Re: [OSM-talk] Publishing bot code. GPL or AGPL?

2017-10-17 Thread James
You could always release it under Mozilla Public License 2.0 and that explicitely requires people to offer source code. On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 3:01 PM, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > 2017-10-17 13:27 GMT-03:00 Safwat Halaby : > > I understand that GPLv3

Re: [Talk-ca] COMS2200 Ottawa, Carleton University

2017-10-11 Thread James
I think some people are missing the point of the class by saying: Go map an african village. The point was to have students go outside and take photos of real world items(surveying) and upload them to mapillary Then the students take the mapillary photo key and add it to the item in OSM They are

Re: [Talk-ca] COMS2200 Ottawa, Carleton University

2017-10-11 Thread James
Hi Tracey, as promised I started some documentation on what errors I'm seeing quite often. I will be updating it later during my lunch hour with more examples: https://github.com/TraceyLauriault/COMS2200A/issues/19 On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 11:08 PM, Steve Singer wrote: > On

Re: [Talk-ca] COMS2200 Ottawa, Carleton University

2017-10-10 Thread James
1. the restriction was a login(zero minute) block to grab users attention after multiple attempts trying to contact: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/YueYuan/history#map=18/45.35567/-75.75291 so once they login and view the message they can edit again 2. They have not been editing just around

Re: [Talk-ca] Using City of Vancouver Open Licensed Data?

2017-10-03 Thread James
I'm not sure if Paul has imported data for Vancouver before or not. But before you import, you need to document on the wiki. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:British_Columbia:Vancouver#Imports would be a good place to start looking what people have done in the past On Oct 2, 2017 10:57

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

2017-09-29 Thread James
or name:en On Sep 29, 2017 4:17 PM, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: Rue Regent St is incorrect. Rue Regent is french and Regent Street would be English. Just the fact that Street is shorten to St is wrong as osm fully expands names On Sep 29, 2017 4:10 PM, "Martijn van

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

2017-09-29 Thread James
Rue Regent St is incorrect. Rue Regent is french and Regent Street would be English. Just the fact that Street is shorten to St is wrong as osm fully expands names On Sep 29, 2017 4:10 PM, "Martijn van Exel" wrote: > Hi all, > > How do you map bilingual signposts? Ones that say

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >