Re: [Talk-us] Monterey - Santa Cruz County line in Monterey Bay

You are correct. The official Monterey County GIS file from [1] has the boundary at the shoreline, whereas OSM has it going out into the ocean, see https://imgur.com/a/aCMROQZ (OSM in orange, Official GIS in dark gray). I don’t know all coastal counties have their

Re: [Talk-ko] Result of survey about Korean name of railway station.

Done! Perhaps you want to announce on the main talk list or write a quick diary entry? Martijn > On Dec 1, 2018, at 11:34 AM, Max wrote: > > Good idea! I think both challenges are relatively easy and fun. > > max > > > On 30.11.18 19:27, Martijn van Exel wrote: >

Re: [Talk-ko] Result of survey about Korean name of railway station.

Perhaps this thread helps remind people :D I can ‘feature’ one of them for a while if you think that may help? Martijn > On Nov 30, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Max wrote: > > On 30.11.18 17:23, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> By the way, there are currently 2 Korea specific challenges

Re: [Talk-ko] Result of survey about Korean name of railway station.

Hi, Do you want to add this text in an automated way or manually? If you want to review and edit the names manually, I can set up a MapRoulette challenge for you so you can go through them one by one and edit them that way. The nice thing about that is you can see the progress easily. Let me

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

On Wed, 28 Nov 2018 02:07:45 -0800 Minh Nguyen wrote: > On 2018-11-28 01:57, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > On 2018-11-20 08:57, Martijn van Exel wrote: > >> When I map these roads I include the FS number (just the number) > >> as a ref, since that is how they

[talk-au] MapRoulette challenges

Hi folks. The Telenav team continuously runs a series of data integrity checks on OSM data that we’re interested in. The OSM wiki has an overview [1]. Now some of these are easy fixes, and that means they make interesting MapRoulette challenges. For example here’s a challenge that highlights

Re: [OSM-talk] OSMF silently sides with Russia?

Resending from my personal email address, see below. > On Nov 26, 2018, at 2:56 PM, Martijn van Exel > wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is to inform you that the OSMF board did receive a formal request last > week to appeal the DWG decision referred to in this thread

Re: [talk-au] Hello!

consider it. Is there already some coordination going on, like collecting information about datasets and licenses on an OSM wiki page?-- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Thu, Nov 22, 2018, at 22:10, Nick Hocking wrote: > Hi Martijn, > In my opinion the biggest improvement to Aust

Re: [talk-au] Hello!

Andrew -- I am very glad to hear it! I would be delighted to help promote MapRoulette use more, please do let me know if you have issues or you want help setting up a particular challenge.-- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Fri, Nov 23, 2018, at 02:56, Andrew Harvey wrote: > Hey Mart

[Talk-us] Short 'connector' roads -- _link or not?

Hi, As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one: https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594 To my mind these need to be fixed, but I wanted to ask here first, so I can get the

Re: [talk-au] Hello!

/44833 > On Nov 20, 2018, at 12:32 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > Nice to make your virtual acquaintance. > > I noticed there was a bit of discussion as to how to snap _link / ramp roads > to the main highway. > The Telenav team uses the co

Re: [talk-au] Hello!

her what I did was correct, or if my method has given you > any ideas? > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Joel%20Hansen/diary/43896 > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Joel%20Hansen/diary/43896> > > On 8/11/18 4:10 am, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> I’m new on thi

Re: [talk-au] Question Regarding multiple alt_names

Hi Nemanja, You can use semicolons if there are multiple alternate names, like alt_name=Big Apple Street;Highway 666. Folks used to use name_1, name_2 but this seems to be generally discouraged now. There is also loc_name but the use of that has always been a bit unclear to me, since local

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

ory=transportation> Perhaps the layer was created based on a filtered or older version of this file. I don’t know who maintains it but it may be due for an update. Martijn > On Nov 20, 2018, at 9:57 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > Frederik, > I don’t remember it being widely discu

Re: [Talk-us] Forest Routes

Frederik, I don’t remember it being widely discussed / agreed upon. When I map these roads I include the FS number (just the number) as a ref, since that is how they are signposted in the field. https://dcasler.com/2011/06/16/owl-creek-pass-getting-there-from-ridgway/

[OSM-talk] MapRoulette news

Hi all, MapRoulette recently introduced Mapillary support, enhanced support for updating existing challenges, support for more map base layers (from the editor layer index), more ways to sort the Challenge list, and much more. Oh and I heard from a reliable source that Vespucci will support

Re: [Talk-us] Add street names from TIGER

Existing challenges all done :) Let’s look into some new ones then. If someone wants to set up MSP based on existing city or TIGER data, that’d be great. Martijn > On Nov 16, 2018, at 8:00 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > We’re down to 128 as of just now! > > Any requests f

[Talk-us] More MapRoulette fun (?)

Hi folks, I created a few more MapRoulette challenges based on something I noticed while editing in my own area: some important roads (trunk, primary, secondary) that have neither name or ref. To my mind this is often a mistake. Here’s a challenge for Georgia

Re: [Talk-us] Add street names from TIGER

https://github.com/TelenavMapping/Community_involvement/issues/14 <https://github.com/TelenavMapping/Community_involvement/issues/14> Martijn > On Nov 16, 2018, at 8:32 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > That is theoretically possible and you could even do it yourself if you are &g

[Talk-us] Signs detected by OSC

Hi all, I added a list of signs that are currently detected by OpenStreetCam to the OSM wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenStreetCam/Detected_Signs#United_States If you want to help out improve the

Re: [Talk-us] Add street names from TIGER

n-state-metrogis-trans-mrcc-centerlines > <https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metrogis-trans-mrcc-centerlines> > > Joe Sapletal > > From: Ian Dees <mailto:ian.d...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, November 16, 2018 9:06 AM > To: Martijn van Exel <mailto:m...@rtijn.org

Re: [Talk-us] Add street names from TIGER

We’re down to 128 as of just now! Any requests for other cities? Martijn > On Nov 9, 2018, at 3:36 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > There’s currently a total of 1303 tasks in these challenges ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.

Re: [Talk-us] Strange city boundary: Lee, Illinois

Hi all, User 25or6to4 contacted me offline mentioning that he has been working on improving boundaries based on newer TIGER for the past months now. That, taken together with the boundless (ha) energy exuding from this thread, makes me have a very happy boundary-positive attitude! I’m not

Re: [Talk-us] Strange city boundary: Lee, Illinois

that, there really isn't a good national-level dataset of city > boundaries and Google uses CDP boundaries for their search results... > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 9:49 AM Martijn van Exel <mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote: > Sorry that link is bad. https://cloud.rtijn.org/

Re: [Talk-us] Strange city boundary: Lee, Illinois

Sorry that link is bad. https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/ZLen9D8M3tYaAgj <https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/ZLen9D8M3tYaAgj> > On Nov 14, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > I looked at a few place boundaries in Utah and compared with current TIGER > files.. Definitely nee

Re: [Talk-us] Strange city boundary: Lee, Illinois

I looked at a few place boundaries in Utah and compared with current TIGER files.. Definitely needs work.. https://www.dropbox.com/s/e1113me8y9t1my5/Screenshot%202018-11-14%2008.42.30.png?dl=0 (colored =

Re: [Talk-us] Strange city boundary: Lee, Illinois

Thanks for pointing it out, Walter. As others have said, local admin boundaries and their hierarchies are weird from a European perspective. I am still trying to understand it. The boundary may still be wrong. Many (all?) of the admin8 boundaries were imported almost 10 years ago. I wouldn’t

Re: [Talk-us] Add street names from TIGER

gt; On 11/9/2018 5:36 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> As an experiment my colleagues from the Telenav map team churned out some >> local MapRoulette challenges for adding missing street names from TIGER. The >> tasks were created by comparing TIGER (2017) to existing OSM data us

[Talk-us] Add street names from TIGER

Hi all, As an experiment my colleagues from the Telenav map team churned out some local MapRoulette challenges for adding missing street names from TIGER. The tasks were created by comparing TIGER (2017) to existing OSM data using our conflation tool Cygnus, which outputs ways with no names in

[talk-au] Hello!

I’m new on this list. My name is Martijn van Exel. I am Dutch but live in the U.S.A. where I work for Telenav. I already introduced myself on Slack where I talked a bit about Telenav looking at possibly helping improve the map in Australia. I am just not sure if there’s folks here who

Re: [Talk-us] Review named junction nodes

012090132=0.35483101059177824=2.2895309990765194> > On Nov 6, 2018, at 1:17 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > Hi, > > I created a MapRoulette challenge to review named junction nodes. Since named > junctions are very uncommon, most of these should probably be edited. There’s >

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

Like I said, I will leave it to the local mappers to figure out what is best. I did refine the instructions for the U.S. challenge a little more, since there are definitely legitimate uses of the `name` tag on junction nodes. I included an example. Have a look if you’re interested:

[Talk-us] Review named junction nodes

Hi, I created a MapRoulette challenge to review named junction nodes. Since named junctions are very uncommon, most of these should probably be edited. There’s only a few hundred of them so we should be able to review these together pretty quickly.

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

on is > that these should all have the names removed when it's clearly the > destination, and that this destination info should be added to the link way > if it isn't already. > > Andrew Lester > Victoria, BC > > From: "Martijn van Exel" > To: "talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

at these nodes.. Best, -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, at 08:33, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Is there an Overpass or other query that could detect all these > situations? I could make a MapRoulette challenge out of them so we can > look at them together and remove

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

. -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Mon, Nov 5, 2018, at 18:23, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > Yep, so in this case removing the name and keeping the ref on the > junction node sounds appropriate. > > While we're at it, the service road > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481541

Re: [Talk-ca] Exit with name on node *and* destination

it of > tagging for the renderer to get the exit name to show up on the > default OSM.org layer. > > --Jarek > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 14:47, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I just came across this >> >> https://www.evernote.com/l

Re: [Talk-us] USPS Post Boxes

Hi Leif, > On Sep 26, 2018, at 7:16 AM, Leif Rasmussen <354...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Martijn, > I have very little opinion in which value of operator should be used, as long > as they are consistent. I think that basing the 'preferred' values on what > can be found printed on the post boxes,

Re: [Talk-us] Yet more about USA Rail: now, wiki

I pinned it for Nov 17-18 weekend. Add your city and plan a mapping party! Martijn > On Sep 18, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > Okay there we are! > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapathon/US_Fall_Mapathon_2018 > <https://wiki.openstreetmap

Re: [Talk-us] Yet more about USA Rail: now, wiki

.com>> wrote: > > No hijack seen as actual or intended: great idea, Martijn! > > Trains, transit, our map: these really do keep getting better and better. > > SteveA > >> On Sep 18, 2018, at 12:01 PM, Martijn van Exel > <mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote: >&

Re: [Talk-us] Yet more about USA Rail: now, wiki

To branch out a little bit — sorry to hijack the thread Steve — it would be nice to do a nationwide transit mapathon around transit. We used to run nationwide coordinated mapathons and I miss them. I think they are fun to connect communities. Who’s in and who wants to help coordinate? Martijn

Re: [Talk-us] Shaped highway shields - trying to revive

Agreed. I think it's really nice to have active thinking and work around this. The key is to get the rendering stack people involved. Perhaps Paul Norman can function as a liaison? Martijn Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 24, 2018, at 12:06, Evin Fairchild wrote: > > Really glad to see that

Re: [Talk-us] ref=* tags on links

Agree with that, Evin. Unfortunately I think there are still quite a few countries where route relations are not as widely used / accepted (I remember the UK bring among them? Perhaps someone can do an overpass query to visualize) so unless we get everyone on board with them we're likely stuck

Re: [Talk-us] Food delivery services: Move-fast-and-break-trust

A bit of a tangent perhaps, but I sometimes will carry a digital audio recorder to quickly take a voice note instead of a picture or paper note. It’s very inconspicuous and JOSM can load them in the actual location if they are properly time stamped. Martijn van Exel > On Aug 21, 2018, at

Re: [Talk-us] admin_level=8 boundaries in Parker County, TX

with (Dutch) Baarle-Hertog. Before the Schengen treaty, this led to weird situations with lots of checkpoints and people paying property taxes in two countries. Some more info here: https://brilliantmaps.com/baarle-hertogbaarle-nassau/ -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Thu, Jul 12, 2018

Re: [Talk-us] admin_level=8 boundaries in Parker County, TX

with other features much, but obviously that should be researched. As for this specific case, current boundary from TIGER 2017 in brown, OSM in green: https://cloud.rtijn.org/s/bpxPffp6ycm8rF7 -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, at 05:10, Frederik Ramm wrote: >

Re: [Talk-ko] NTIC source

That is really useful information. I think an OSM wiki page is in order. I created one that points to this thread. Please expand if you have more information. Thanks all for your help clearing this up! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Korea/NTIC_Import -- Martijn van Exel m

Re: [OSM-talk] Source 'NTIC' on S-Korea OSM data

Hmm, perhaps. It would have to be a pretty significant source, there are currently 41650 ways with tag source=NTIC. Feels too prevalent for either of the options you mention, but who knows?-- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, at 16:05, James wrote: > Co

[OSM-talk] Source 'NTIC' on S-Korea OSM data

Hi all, I was looking at source tags and noticing that a lot of ways have 'NTIC' as source for South Korea. Who knows what this source is? -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https

Re: [Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2018-07-03

Also, if Garmin can sell OSM maps for US/Canada for $50 there is a clear business opportunity there. -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, at 12:13, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: > I frequently download Dave's Garmin images for my (fairly ancient, yet > still

Re: [Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2018-07-03

still be done :) --> https://ma.rtijn.org/2018/07/02/right-to-upload-maps.html Interesting, I didn't know that the default Garmin map is now OSM based. Is that also true for the car products? Edge is a bicycle device, right?-- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Thu, Jul 5, 2018, at 11

[Talk-us] [Utah / Salt Lake City] Summer events schedule

ing ad hoc as well. Martijn -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-us] Propose a session for State of the Map US

me know which of these you would be interested in. * Bus routes and the crazy public transport tagging scheme * The new version of MapRoulette * Slack, mailing lists, forums, IRC, enough is enough? * Something about TIGER cleanup * The OSM Foundation and You -- Martijn van Exel m

Re: [Talk-us] New MapRoulette challenges

That would be something to file on github as an issue so we can look into it. May be a bug or something to do with your browser environment. Martijn van Exel > On Jun 21, 2018, at 22:40, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Looks like my points aren't sticking and I can't set a defau

Re: [Talk-us] New MapRoulette challenges

Most of it is taken from OSM. If you change things there, MapRoulette will pick it up. What did you want to change? Martijn van Exel > On Jun 21, 2018, at 20:43, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Is it normal to not be able to update your user profile in MapRoulette? > >> On Thu, Ju

Re: [Talk-us] OSM US Camera lending program update

, but it has different optics to better support the quality of still images needed for OSC and specifically feature detection.-- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Thu, Jun 14, 2018, at 11:20, Paul Johnson wrote: > For those of us who have our own Waylens, what's the best way to > collect i

[Talk-us] OSM US Camera lending program update

-program/ -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Slack: Do we need an Alternative (was Planning an import, in Price George...)

questions and announcements on here. As a matter of fact I have something to say, I'll start another thread. -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, at 15:22, Doug Hembry wrote: > I stand with Greg Morgan and Rihards on this one (and I think, Steve, if > I remember right

Re: [Talk-us] Slack: Do we need an Alternative (was Planning an import in Price George...)

Hi Simon, > > * everyone is on it > That's a bit of a self fulfilling prophecy after you've essentially > force migrated everybody there and then cut the ties with any other > competing media (in OSM) so that you can have your nice walled garden. I would argue that it is a good thing that people

Re: [Talk-us] New MapRoulette challenges

for other areas to do this in. The challenges are based on output from the Cygnus conflation tool which has a web interface here: http://cygnus.improve-osm.org/ , in case you're interested in working with it yourself.-- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Fri, Jun 8, 2018, at 01:02, Horea Meleg

Re: [Talk-us] Drop the tiger:reviewed tag from roads

of bots have touched most TIGER imported ways, so TIGER ways having version=1 are rare.-- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 11:44, Mike Thompson wrote: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:56 AM, Martijn van Exel > <m...@rtijn.org> wrote

Re: [Talk-us] Drop the tiger:reviewed tag from roads

that would indicate TIGER as the original source, so we can continue to detect 'unmodified TIGER' roads.-- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 10:25, Clifford Snow wrote: > The tag, tiger:reviewed that is left over from the 2006/7 import of > TIGER roads has lo

Re: [Talk-us] Maximum number of tasks on US tasker

+ missing railroad crossings which were also attributable to TIGER .) But perhaps you have something different in mind. I'd like to think MapRoulette can help, also because not everybody prefers the same style of working on large projects.-- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Mon, May 7, 2018

Re: [Talk-us] Maximum number of tasks on US tasker

I’d like to see how TM and MapRoulette could be complementary in this effort. I know Clifford has set up a TIGER related challenge on MapRoulette, and I have done this in the past as well. I feel that TM can be good for a general ask like ‘check all TIGER residential roads in rural areas in

Re: [OSM-talk] How INSPIRE data are sold in your countries

INSPIRE sets the framework for geospatial (meta)data in the EU and requires member states to commit to having certain types of data available in a defined exchange format. When I was involved in this more closely, there was not the assumption that the data would be free (as in beer), and as far

Re: [Talk-us] Announcing New MapRoulette beta

All, The Georgia Motorway exit destination challenge is DONE. I featured a similar challenge for Tennessee. Have at it :) http://maproulette.org/mr3/browse/challenges/2936 -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, at 13:24, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi

Re: [Talk-ca] Trans-Canada Highway research

] but it is incomplete and broken. One idea would be to repair it, and the province-level relations that would be the members of it. Would you be interested in coordinating that? [0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1307243 -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, at 13:24, Pierre

[OSM-talk] New MapRoulette version

://github.com/maproulette/maproulette3 OSM wiki (still need to update): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapRoulette -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-ca] Trans-Canada Highway research

on your own Overpass queries or GeoJSON files. The diary post explaining MapRoulette is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/43596 Thanks, -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, at 07:13, Begin Daniel wrote: > Andrew, Je ne crois pas que le fait que

Re: [Talk-us] Announcing New MapRoulette beta

/maproulette3/issues/224 -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Mon, Mar 26, 2018, at 12:13, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi all, > > A brand new MapRoulette is now in public beta and I would very much like > for you to start using it and let me know what you think! You can g

[Talk-us] Announcing New MapRoulette beta

uch improved compared to the previous version. Your feedback on that is especially welcome. If you need help, holler. Please let me know your feedback and ideas! -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org ht

[Talk-us] Can you design a logo for SOTM US 2018?

in the next weeks. Thanks! -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Broderick wrote: > ... > Downgrading some ways to tracks without doing so to a whole localized > network creates the appearance of a higher level of data accuracy than > actually exists, which IMO is more likely to bite someone in

Re: [Talk-us] Rural US: Correcting Original TIGER Imported Ways

I am very happy to see this rekindled interest in TIGER cleanup! Having done a fair amount of backcountry exploring, I know that there is a wide range of road grades and aerial imagery alone is not enough to decide how navigable a roads is for a particular type of vehicle. Or, for that matter,

Re: [Talk-us] iD news: v2.5.0, OpenStreetCam, and request for translation help..

Fantastic, Bryan. Many many thanks for your continued efforts to move the iD project forward! Martijn > On Dec 7, 2017, at 07:34, Bryan Housel wrote: > > Happy December! We have lots moving in the iD editor project. > >  OpenStreetCam > > Last month, I released iD

Re: [Talk-de] Announcement and RFC: German Local Chapter application

in English. Martijn van Exel Secretary OpenStreetMap Foundation > On Nov 13, 2017, at 3:03 PM, Martijn van Exel <mart...@osmfoundation.org> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > First of all, my apologies for posting to talk-de in English. Feel free to > respond in German. It wo

Re: [Talk-us] Highway exit renumbering

Hi, To my mind it’s completely optional to preserve this information unless it’s somehow still used on signage. I’ve seen old_ref=… used here in Utah and that tag seems to be in wide use: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/old_ref#map

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

I’d appreciate you back that statement up with some data that goes beyond some isolated examples, Dave. > On Nov 24, 2017, at 2:18 PM, Dave F wrote: > > > On 24/11/2017 07:59, joost schouppe wrote: >> For example, "Skipped" to me means "meh, didn't feel like doing

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Hoi Joost, Mike, James, The Skipped status merely indicates that one user has decided to skip it, but that does not preclude others from seeing it. They will see the ‘Skipped’ status so they know that a user has previously skipped it, but otherwise it’s still in the pool with all other active

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

asks of the challenge. > > /Erwin > > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 12:36 AM Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org > <mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote: > Hi Erwin, > > Can you give an example of what you would like to see and how you would like >

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

if JOSM and iD support sending changeset tags through remote control and query string respectively? -- Martijn van Exel On November 20, 2017 at 2:00:36 PM, Pierre Béland (pierz...@yahoo.fr) wrote: > Hi Martijn > We see an increase of coordinatead actions via QA and TM

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

and / or iD support ‘sending’ changeset tags through remote control / the querystring? Martijn -- Martijn van Exel On November 20, 2017 at 2:00:36 PM, Pierre Béland (pierz...@yahoo.fr) wrote: > Hi Martijn > We see an increase of coordinatead actions via QA and TM

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

to best do this yet. One solution would be to filter by challenge ‘centroids’ (simple), another would be to consider whatever challenge has at least one task within the current map bounds (harder). What would be your idea about this? Others with an opinion? -- Martijn van Exel On November 20

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Hi Erwin,  Can you give an example of what you would like to see and how you would like it to work? --  Martijn van Exel On November 20, 2017 at 6:30:01 AM, Erwin Olario (gov...@gmail.com) wrote: I wish to see support for OSM tags for tasks. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:02 AM Martijn van Exel

[OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

Hi all,  For those who have used MapRoulette or at least have a good understanding of what it does: what would be the *one top thing* for you that would make it better?  I am asking because I am working on a new major release.  --  Martijn van Exel

[Talk-us] Many Mappy Minutes 2

Hi all, It's time for the second Many Mappy Minutes, the monthly online hangout for chatting about all things OSM. We'll start at 5:30 PT[1] Details in my diary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/42393 Sorry for the late notice! Martijn [1]

[Talk-de] Announcement and RFC: German Local Chapter application

application on the wiki: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Local_ Chapters/Applications/Germany I propose that we close this round of discussion on December 1, but if you need more time, please let me know. I am looking forward to hearing your responses. Best regards, Martijn van Exel Secretary

Re: [Talk-ca] Disconnected addresses

of Ottawa to get back to me on what is the correct >> name and then I will fix either the street or the address accordingly. So >> long way of saying, anything within the bounds of the City of Ottawa, I >> will fix. >> On 2017-10-31 06:11 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: >> >> Hi

Re: [Talk-ca] Disconnected addresses

. In the mean time, if you have any ideas for how to approach this, let me know. Thanks! Martijn > On Oct 11, 2017, at 12:05 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Matthew Darwin pointed out on Github that some street name updates by the > Telenav team le

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

Okay folks. Coming back from not even 48 hours camping and this thread has exploded. I don't think it benefits anyone to continue in this way. Valuable insights get lost in the sheer volume of email; arguments are being repeated. I am dedicating the next Many Mappy Minutes (our monthly-ish online

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

Hi all, I haven't abandoned this thread or thinking about it. It has just taken me a while to read through all the diary comments + what is being said in this thread. I intend to follow up with another diary post where I try to collect this smart crowd's thoughts and suggestions, but it will

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

hat don't understand the language extension > continue to work. > > On 2017-10-09 03:52 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > Hi all, > > I contacted the most active mappers in NB. It seems that mapping bilingual > street destinations with destination:street:fr and destination:street

[Talk-ca] Disconnected addresses

Hi all, Matthew Darwin pointed out on Github that some street name updates by the Telenav team lead to 'orphaned' address nodes. The ticket is here: https://github.com/TelenavMapping/mapping-projects/issues/34 This is just to let you know that we are aware and planning to fix soonest. Thanks

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

<jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sounds good to me. > > > Cheerio John > > On 9 Oct 2017 3:55 pm, "Martijn van Exel" <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I contacted the most active mappers in NB. It seems that mappin

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Hi all, Thanks all for your input. I get a sense that there is a preference for separating out the names on these destination signs in separate language tags, even though documentation for destination:street is sparse. To be sure I contacted what I hope are the top mappers in NB. A list of

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

Thanks all for your input. With this advice in mind, and my own thinking / opinion, I wrote the a diary entry which I hope will spark further debate :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/42450 Best Martijn On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >

[Talk-us] Trunk

Question for you all: What make Michigan state routes 5 and 10[1] trunks rather than primaries? To my mind these are highway=primary mainly because of at-grade intersections.. I am still confused about what makes a trunk road in the US. To my mind it's roads with no at-grade intersections but

Re: [Talk-us] Bicycle infrastructure

I also exported the data to geojson.io: http://bl.ocks.org/anonymous/raw/77da9f9103fcbf5c8382a316b7f22ef5/ Martijn On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am holding a bike mapping party for our local OSM group this Thur

Re: [Talk-us] Center turn lane mapping

uple of lanes in the same direction. > > Tod > > > On Oct 3, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I had a discussion about center turn lane mapping with my team this > morning, and I wrote a diary about it proposing one consistent s

Re: [Talk-us] Center turn lane mapping

Oh, and the corresponding team ticket: https://github.com/TelenavMapping/mapping-projects/issues/28 Martijn On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > I had a discussion about center turn lane mapping with my team this > morning, a

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >