On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 at 23:11, john whelan wrote:
> JAVA has a number of problems. Many corporations ban its installation
> citing security issues which restricts the machines that can use JOSM with
> all its nice tools.
>
Is this an actual problem you, or people you know, encounter? If so, is
th
On 15 March 2018 at 19:57, Mike Thompson wrote:
> I am trying to use the "Strava Cycling and Running Heatmap" in JOSM but I am
> getting a "Error HTTP error 403 when loading tiles."
According to the Dutch forum, the following URLs should work:
tms[3,17]:http://globalheat.strava.com/tiles/cyclin
On 19 February 2018 at 16:46, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> Checked out the latest OSM Carto 3.x style
Cool work! If you run osm2pgsql with '--hstore' and
'--tag-transform-script openstreetmap-carto.lua', I'd expect that the
4.0 branch of OSM carto will also work.
-- Matthijs
___
contributor.
For a full list of commits, see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/compare/v4.5.0...v4.6.0 .
As always, we welcome any bug reports at
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues .
Kind regards,
Matthijs Melissen
On 26 November 2017 at 20:26, Simon Poole wrote:
> Exactly the other way around: people love to create wiki pages and put
> some outlandish claims on them that have nothing to do with reality,
> leading to people that actually believe the nonsense to be frustrated
> (in this case people believing
On 21 November 2017 at 14:47, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski
wrote:
> "I'm worried about this. I have not performed a technical review." as a
> blocker for PR merge:
> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/2939
>
> Basically, most of wide ~2011 dev community was hired away, and
On 24 September 2017 at 23:01, Matthijs Melissen
wrote:
> I would like to ask for your opinion on the choice of language used in
> the Default map on openstreetmap.org.
Thank you all for your contributions to the discussion. It seems that
the current choice, rendering local names only,
On 25 September 2017 at 13:21, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> I'd invest the available brainpower in steps needed to achieve
>> this goal, even if it's a year or two in the future.
>
> Which means vector tiles... which we should be looking at anyway.
>
> But that needs to be a
rmation on this issue can be found on Github:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/803
I'm looking forward to your opinions.
Kind regards,
Matthijs Melissen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.op
On 3 August 2017 at 23:07, Simon Poole wrote:
> The LWG would like to start a period of public review and consultation on
> our draft trademark policy, that we intend to bring forward to the OSMF
> board for adoption as a formal policy, please see the text here:
The proposed policy would discoura
On 20 June 2017 at 12:33, Sandor Seres wrote:
> ... In a huge effort in the last months we have removed old-style
> multipolygons from the OSM database completely, so this is a good step!...
> Please help me with a correct interpretation of "OSM database" in your letter.
The remaining old-style
On 19 June 2017 at 00:43, Sérgio V. wrote:
> Hi, please, is there still a rendering bug on waterway=stream?
> It only appeared for the ones also tagged as "intermittent=yes", rendering
> in black dotted.
If I'm not mistaken, v4.0.0 has been rolled out to (some of?) the
servers now, so I think thi
Dear all,
Today, v3.3.1 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet (the default
stylesheet on openstreetmap.org) has been released.
This version includes a single change:
* Fix a regression in intermittent waterways
For a full list of commits, see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/c
On 4 May 2017 at 16:30, Jochen Topf wrote:
> The old-style multipolygon relations are history! In not even two months
> the OSM community cleaned up all of the nearly a quarter million
> relations. You can see the it here:
> http://area.jochentopf.com/stats/#old_style_multipolygons
Thanks for the
On 11 December 2016 at 01:15, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> But participants
> in the thread were mostly experienced with French-speaking Africa - so I
> cannot rule out the existence of a living street legal classification in
> other locales.
At least South Africa seems to have legal living_streets
On 14 November 2016 at 02:22, Matthijs Melissen
wrote:
> I have now added support to taginfo for showing an example rendering in
> the taglists on the wiki.
I have included some TagList templates now on the main Map Features
page, as well on the individual pages.
See for example:
On 6 November 2016 at 12:52, Jochen Topf wrote:
> I have now added support to taginfo for showing an example rendering in
> the taglists on the wiki.
I enabled this functionality now on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Map_Features/man_made .
We now have TagList templates for the fol
On 6 November 2016 at 12:52, Jochen Topf wrote:
> I have now added support to taginfo for showing an example rendering in
> the taglists on the wiki.
Thanks, that's great!
> Note that the "osmcarto-rendering-size" setting in the infobox is not used.
> That setting is really not neccesary if the
On 21 September 2016 at 09:25, Jochen Topf wrote:
> On Mi, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:33:28 +0200, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
>> On 1 September 2016 at 15:04, Jochen Topf wrote:
>> > So, if somebody adds the rendering to the infobox (and tells me about it),
>> > I'll pul
On 21 September 2016 at 09:53, François Lacombe
wrote:
> You deal with pages like Template:Map_Features/XXX but power template is
> currently known as Template:Map_Features:power
> Have we to rename the template to Template:Map_Features/Power ?
Yes, for the moment it is necessary to create a new
On 1 September 2016 at 10:01, Matthijs Melissen
wrote:
> As a firs step, I included the list here on the Geological map features page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geological
> it seems to work well there.
We now have TagList templates for the following k
On 1 September 2016 at 15:04, Jochen Topf wrote:
> So, if somebody adds the rendering to the infobox (and tells me about it),
> I'll pull that data from taginfo and can put it in the taglist tables.
I added it to the infobox as osmcarto-rendering.
It is currently only used in the supermarket pag
On 1 September 2016 at 15:05, Jochen Topf wrote:
> What are the problems with translations?
I didn't realise the non-English Map Features templates include the
English Map Features template. Nothing we can't fix, but simply
putting TagLists in the English Template:Map_Features:XXX pages won't
wor
On 1 September 2016 at 10:01, Matthijs Melissen
wrote:
> As a firs step, I included the list here on the Geological map features page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geological
> it seems to work well there.
As there are some problems with the translations of the pages, this
has
On 1 September 2016 at 09:01, Jochen Topf wrote:
> And feel free to tell me if you need anything more or different. What it
> does at the moment is what I thought might be useful and doable. That
> doesn't mean this is the best solution.
As a firs step, I included the list here on the Geological
On Thursday, 1 September 2016, Jochen Topf wrote:
> On Do, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:42:10 +0200, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> > We have currently a Map Features page on the wiki:
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
> >
> > The page also contains definitions for
Hi,
We have currently a Map Features page on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
The page also contains definitions for all features. We therefore
store the definitions now in two places: in the map features tables
and in the infoboxes on the pages themselves.
Duplication o
Hi all,
Recently, a new tool was created by Martin Raifer (@tyrasd) to
generate graphs of the usage of tags over time. This is a great tool
that gives us more insight in what drives the choice of tags by
mappers. The tool can be found at http://taghistory.raifer.tech/.
I wrote an OSM diary to dis
On 31 August 2016 at 18:32, Andy Townsend wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but a web search of e.g. "something
> site:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/"; finds relevant posts?
> Is there something I'm not understanding here?
You're right, something must have gone wrong on my si
Hi,
The mailing list archives at
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/ are currently not indexed
by Google. I suppose this is caused by the tag that is included in every page of the
archive.
Would it be possible to remove this tag? I think it would be very
useful if the mailing list archive
://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues.
Kind regards,
Matthijs Melissen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 26 July 2016 at 01:51, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I can't speak to the qualities of Go Map! but I think your review should
> also mention the fact that this is proprietary software - it doesn't
> cost anything but you can't look at the source. In that, it is different
> from almost every other OSM
Hi all,
I always used to be quite sceptical about mobile mapping applications.
Due to the small screen size and lack of a mouse pointer, mobile
mapping seemed clumsy and error-prone. For me, collecting data in the
field and then adding it on a personal computer with JOSM was the way
to go.
Howeve
On 14 July 2016 at 21:16, Pierre Béland wrote:
> Michal, you might have seen my OSMCompare slider map where I use the FOSM
> layer for comparison.
>
> http://pierzen.dev.openstreetmap.org/hot/leaflet/OSM-Compare-before-after.html#10/27.9083/85.5286
Nice work, inspired on this I just created an al
On 11 July 2016 at 01:08, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> The automated edits code of conduct is there for a reason; had user
> Test360 complied with it, then his edit would likely not have been
> faulty
My main issue with the AEcoc is that it is nearly impossible to comply
with, especially the part that
On 10 July 2016 at 23:26, Éric Gillet wrote:
> What are your thoughts ?
I fully agree with all your points. I think a wider community
discussion on the current guidelines is necessary.
-- Matthijs
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://l
Dear all,
Today, v2.40.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet (the default
stylesheet on openstreetmap.org) has been released and rolled out to
the openstreetmap.org servers. It might take a couple of days before
all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* More consistent size of icon
Dear all,
Yesterday, v2.38.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
still take a couple of days before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Add rendering for natural=shoal, and natural=reef.
* Change of re
On 29 January 2016 at 17:37, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> "but that's not much to do with tagging diversity" - I would dispute
> it, from my personal experience. Tagging diversity IS one of real
> problems in using OSM data.
+1.
-- Matthijs
___
talk mai
On 28 January 2016 at 20:16, David Marchal wrote:
> On a GitHub issue
> (https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2027#issuecomment-174443685),
> I've been told that Wiki tagging votes are only advisory and that the
> community is only invited, neither required nor recommended, t
Dear all,
Today, v2.37.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
still take a couple of days before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Improved admin boundaries and labels on low zoom levels
* New farmlan
On 30 October 2015 at 22:01, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> - shop=pharmacy (use office=pharmacy)
This should be amenity=pharmacy instead of office=pharmacy, of course.
-- Matthijs
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
ht
Dear all,
Today, v2.36.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
still take a couple of days before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Major rewrite of road and railway rendering, as part of Mateusz
Konie
On 17 October 2015 at 10:45, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 17/10/15 09:03, nebulon42 wrote:
>> I don't know an ETA of this change on the tile servers yet as it is a
>> quite major change. Others may be able to comment on that.
>
> Is this ACTUALLY a 'done deal'? I though there was a going to be at
> le
Hi Henk,
On 22 September 2015 at 12:43, henk van der laan wrote:
> Over the past couple of month some big changes in the rendering of the
> map have been made.
> These changes do not improve the readabillity of the map, and despite
> it's good intentions do not seem to take into account the basic
On 16 September 2015 at 23:30, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 16/09/15 21:59, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
>
>> Today, v2.35.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
>> released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
>> still take a couple of days befor
Dear all,
Today, v2.35.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
still take a couple of days before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Add new icon for ford
* Stop rendering of landuse=conservation
* Rest
On 31 August 2015 at 11:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> See
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny/surface%3Dsoil_to_surface%3Ddirt
>
> I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a clear
> duplicate of surface=dirt. It is also less popular and un
On 15 August 2015 at 17:14, Lester Caine wrote:
> The obvious question is that given tilemill is not longer being
> maintained, what are the preferred alternatives?
Depending on what you need exactly, Kosmtik might be an alternative:
https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik
-- Matthijs
_
On 16 July 2015 at 15:22, Karl-Philipp Richter wrote:
> Is there an issue tracker for http[s]://www.openstreetmap.org or have
> there ever been any plans for such a useful and straightforward way of
> introducing improvements (it'd be not exposed in a mail list archive
> reachable by a search engi
On 14 May 2015 at 00:34, pmailkeey . wrote:
> On 13 May 2015 at 21:32, Dave F. wrote:
>> There already is an icon for shop=bicycle.
> There's already an icon for amenity=courthouse
Thanks for the corrections Dave and Mike, shop=bicycle and
amenity=court_house are indeed redesigned icons, not n
Dear all,
Today, v2.30.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been rolled
out to the openstreetmap.org servers.
This version includes the following changes:
* New wetland rendering, including differentiation based on the wetland key.
* Added rendering for amenity=bicycle_parking.
* Added ico
On 26 April 2015 at 16:11, colliar wrote:
> Nice work so far, but are the any plans on carto side and on the wiki
> side to support the taginfo feature "projects" ?
From the carto side not at the moment, see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/961 .
It is currently not pos
On 20 April 2015 at 13:27, Wuzzy wrote:
> I have created a wiki page about the Standard layer found on
> www.openstreetmap.org
>
> Here it is:
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Standard_tile_layer
Thanks for that!
I think Andy was also trying to create an updated map key, but I'm not
sure if
Good idea, I support this proposal.
-- Matthijs
On 17 Apr 2015 02:14, "Bryce Nesbitt" wrote:
> See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Bryce_C_Nesbitt
>
> The tag "recycling:excrement" is used 55 times, and has at least four
> distinct meanings.
> I propose to use context to dete
On 18 March 2015 at 21:43, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Paul,
> Since you are involved with updating the rendering, can you tell us the
> process to decide what should be rendered? I realize that part of it must be
> stylistic, but what outside influences cause you to include a tag as part of
> the stan
On 1 March 2015 at 21:04, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> This is now a formal proposal to mechanically remove:
>
> denotation=cluster
> fixme=set␣better␣denotation
>
>
> From 200,000+ nodes. See
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Bryce_C_Nesbitt
I support this proposal.
-- Matthijs
On 27 February 2015 at 14:30, JB wrote:
> On http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-overview, I prefer the first
> graph, showing how the notes db is already getting clustered
I find the page in fact a bit hard to read (but apart from that very
useful). What is the difference between the first
On 26 February 2015 at 13:56, Severin Menard wrote:
> Do the people in charge of the rendering plan to solve this? The UI is
> improving more and more, would be great if the standard map becomes fully
> understandable.
Yes, we're planning to solve this (it is bothering me too). However,
there are
On 26 February 2015 at 12:39, Severin Menard wrote:
> I would like to know where is the good door to knock on to report an issue
> with the OSM standard rendering. For a few months, it became totally fuzzy
> regarding the countries boundaries, almost preventing to distinguish the
> countries from
On 16 February 2015 at 19:20, Rob Nickerson wrote:
> Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting directions/routing
> on openstreetmap.org :-)
A large step forward, thanks to Richard Fairhurst and all others who
made this possible!
-- Matthijs
_
On 10 February 2015 at 12:19, Jo Walsh wrote:
> I wish to float this draft page for discussion and possibly future
> approval!
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
I welcome this page, I think it is very useful.
One small comment - I oppose the following sentence:
| OpenStreetMap h
Dear all,
Yesterday, v2.28.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been released
and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers.
This version includes the following changes:
* The tags amenity=dentist and amenity=townhall are now rendered.
* The tag natural=lake, which has fallen in disuse,
Dear all,
Today, v2.27.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers.
Changes include:
* The following tags are now rendered: amenity=food_court,
amenity=doctors, natural=scree, natural=shingle, natural=bare_rock,
leisure=water_park, le
Dear all,
Today, v2.26.1 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been released
and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers.
This version only includes one change:
* Areas tagged with amenity=place_of_worship and no building tag are
rendered again.
For a full list of commits, see
https://gi
l discussions with
everyone on the list, I wouldn't be able to write a single line of
code. I hope I'm striking the right balance.
Kind regards,
Matthijs
On 27 November 2014 at 01:16, Matthijs Melissen
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We are considering to change the colour of buildings i
Dear all,
Today, v2.26.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released. It will be rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers soon.
Changes include:
* Buildings are now rendered in a much lighter colour
* Airport labels are rendered in a different colour
* The tag natural=mud is rende
On 27 November 2014 at 01:16, Matthijs Melissen
wrote:
> We are considering to change the colour of buildings in
> openstreetmap-carto, the default rendering on openstreetmap.org.
> Because this change has a significant effect on the looks of the map,
> we would like to consult t
As this is a question specifically relating to the situation in the
Netherlands, best to ask your question on the Dutch forum:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
-- Matthijs
2014-12-19 12:33 GMT+00:00 Peter :
> Hallo iedereen,
>
> Eindelijk nog eens vrije tijd en natuurlijk kwam O
Dear all,
Today, v2.25.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
take up to 48 hours before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* New style for marsh/wetland rendering.
* Added rendering for marsh/wetland an
On 27 November 2014 at 22:46, christian.pietz...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> in my opinion buildings could be slightly darker. It is visible enough on
> higher zoom levels but at zoom 14 and above its like there are no buildings.
> (Especially buildings inside industrial areas)
Just to be clear, you
On 27 Nov 2014 09:18, "Lester Caine" wrote:
> Not sure your demo is proving anything. Zooming in on the area covered
> by the demo on the live map I'm not seeing very much of the corruptions
Have their been corruptions? I sm not sure what you are referring to.
> introduced by switching building
On 27 November 2014 at 02:03, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Question. I know this wasn't asked, but in the first link,
> http://bl.ocks.org/pnorman/raw/c61d6b11193081910866/#15.00/50.0611/19.9393,
> but some of the trees don't render in the new version, yet some do. I didn't
> look at the tags to see the
Dear all,
We are considering to change the colour of buildings in
openstreetmap-carto, the default rendering on openstreetmap.org.
Because this change has a significant effect on the looks of the map,
we would like to consult the community before going ahead with this
change.
A rendering demo can
Dear all,
Today, v2.24.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
take up to 48 hours before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Improve legibility of shop names.
* Better rendering of admin borders.
* Behi
On 29 October 2014 20:59, Dan S wrote:
> I guess it's not Matthijs who made this decision...
That's correct. See
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/695 for more
details.
-- Matthijs
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
ht
Dear all,
Today, v2.23.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
take up to 48 hours before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Various small rendering changes to icon labels.
* New icons for place of wors
On 27 Oct 2014 16:16, "Paul Norman" wrote:
>
> With the recent interest in the OSMF, I'm hoping to capitalize on this
and boost working group participation.
Hi Paul,
As I'm too lazy to look up the regulations, could you tell me whether
working group members are required to be member of the found
On 22 October 2014 12:37, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Currently there are 130 Million buildings
> in OSM and 46 Million housenumbers.
Do we know how many of these addresses come from imports? I wouldn't
be surprised if over 90% of the housenumbers in OSM come from imports.
The Dutch BAG import
On 9 October 2014 12:56, Dave F. wrote:
> It appears the mapnik tiles server is down. I'm just getting a grey window
> for the rendering at the moment. Cycle/transport etc are displaying.
> Are others getting the same? Anybody able to sort the problem?
I can confirm this problem. I'm getting 404
Dear all,
Today, v2.22.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
take up to 48 hours before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Major changes in landcover labelling. Landcover labels are now
rendered obliq
Dear all,
We are currently working on changes in the rendering of landcover
labels in openstreetmap-carto, the rendering that is used for the
default map on www.openstreetmap.org.
Before we roll out these changes, we would like to ask you for your feedback.
A demo which allows you to compare the
On 16 September 2014 11:25, Dave F. wrote:
> I've mapped an area where a woodland overlaps with a park:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.48959/-2.52536
>
> The new mapnik rendering doesn't display it.
> Here's a comparison with old & new:
> http://bl.ocks.org/tyrasd/raw/6164696/#16.00/51.
On 7 September 2014 13:51, Gorm E. Johnsen wrote:
> Any changes to runways and taxiways?
> These seem to have an issue at the moment. Hard to tell at a glance due to
> cached tiles and rendering ques.
> But at least they were not rendered at zoom 15 at one recent point in time.
There is indeed an
On 27 August 2014 19:02, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 27/08/14 18:49, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
>
>> Today, v2.19.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
>> released. It will be rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers in
>> one of the next days.
> Actually it p
Dear all,
Today, v2.19.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released. It will be rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers in
one of the next days.
Changes include:
* Improve rendering of labels of highway areas
(https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/865)
* Vario
On 27 August 2014 17:47, Edward Betts wrote:
> I've written some code to match items in Wikidata with items in OSM. Currently
> I have found 70,849 unique matches, where there is a one-to-one mapping
> between OSM and Wikidata objects.
To clarify (this wasn't clear to me from your e-mail): you ar
access=yes, skateboard=no, bicycle=careful? :)
-- Matthijs
On 10 August 2014 16:33, Rob Nickerson wrote:
> Hi Matthijs,
>
> Spotted the following sign related to your "tagging of private roads"
> discussion the other day. Enjoy :-)
>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6J5ZA1hu93beGxtSTVGeUR2aFR
On 10 August 2014 10:09, Markus Lindholm wrote:
> - highway=platform is no longer rendered
> - railway=tram is no longer rendered if it shares a way with highway=*
>
> Are these bugs or a deliberate change?
These are bugs, thanks for reporting. I created issues on Github for them:
- https://githu
I see a lot of comments like this. The underlying problem seems to be
that it is not clear whether notes are meant for armchair mappers, or
for surveyors in the field.
I think both types of notes are useful: that way the notes can serve
as a two-way communication between mappers in the field (for
On 8 August 2014 16:58, Nathan Mixter wrote:
> Is there any way we can start using the addr:unit tag for buildings? This
> was approved several years ago but it still doesn't render yet. If both the
> addr:housenumber and addr:unit tags are used, the housenumber tag is still
> dominant. This looks
Dear all,
Today, v2.18.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been released.
Changes include:
* Remove transparency from certain landuse tags
(https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/792)
* Render lake names on lower zoom levels
(https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetma
On 3 August 2014 11:18, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>> Residential roads in the UK often seem to have 'private road' signs, such
>> as:
>>
>> - 'Private road'
>> - 'Private road no parking'
>> - 'Private road no parking no turning'
>> - 'Residents only no unauthorised parking or turning'
>>
>> How do pe
Residential roads in the UK often seem to have 'private road' signs, such as:
- 'Private road'
- 'Private road no parking'
- 'Private road no parking no turning'
- 'Residents only no unauthorised parking or turning'
How do people tag these roads? For which of these would you use access=private?
On 25 July 2014 15:30, Dave F. wrote:
> highway=services (ie service stations where you can get a drink/meal etc) as
> an area are rendering as a high level layer hiding detail such as car parks.
> Can this be put at a lower level?
I created an issue for that here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm
Hi Tom,
On 25 July 2014 15:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
> Traditionally we have always said that out web site is aimed at supporting
> mappers and not at providing end user services like helping people navigate
> - we provide the data to let other people build services like that.
I have been looking be
On 25 July 2014 13:59, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
> I was under the impression more shops would be displayed than previously?
>
> So far I'm seeing fewer, a notable example being liquor stores that have now
> vanished from visual.
>
> Examples: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2939951075
> ht
On 25 July 2014 12:52, Andy Street wrote:
>> * Cleaning up path rendering on low zooms
>> (https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747)
>
> Is there any chance this could be tweaked slightly? A lot of the
> public footpaths near me are now disappearing completely
> at z13/z14 beca
On 24 July 2014 05:17, Andreas Goss wrote:
> I hope craft=* and office=* will follow. Would probably encourage
> more people to map them and report missing/wrong POIs.
We are working on it, but there are still some issues to resolve. See
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/
On 23 July 2014 02:51, Paul Norman wrote:
> v2.17.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been released, though not
> yet deployed on tile.osm.org.
I would like to thank everyone for all comments, which are really helpful.
Because there are so many comments about different aspects, and
becau
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
