On 8/15/2015 1:15 PM, Ruben Maes wrote:
17 117 occurences is not 'not in the database'.
No, a key not in
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/blob/master/openstreetmap-carto.style
is not in the database. landcover is not in that list, so is not in the
database.
On 8/15/2015 8:13 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
I asked about it here:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1724#issuecomment-128702817
but the issue is closed now without too detailed discussion
The issue was closed because it was solved - the rendering was unified.
The
On 8/15/2015 4:45 AM, tony wroblewski wrote:
The woodland change looks much better, but would it not be possible to
render broadleaved, needleleaved and mixed using different tree
images, as seen on other maps?
Not at the moment. See
On 8/15/2015 8:14 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Not getting much help on the GB list so I thought I'd widen the
question. A couple of years back I had my own server setup working with
a base of OSRM and routing covering the UK. While the map server is
still working, routing has packed up and some of
On 8/15/2015 4:26 AM, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
Does the combined wood/forest update include landcover=trees? If not
it needs to be included all three should render the same (IMO).
No. Nor are there any issues created about rendering landcover=trees. As
the landcover key is currently not in the
This email is also in user diary form at osm.org/user/pnorman/diary/35589
where issue numbers are linked.
OpenStreetMap Carto 2.33.0 has been released. This release focuses on
cartographic style improvements, but the release notes also include 2.32.0.
The biggest changes are
- A randomized
On 8/14/2015 7:27 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
This email is also in user diary form at osm.org/user/pnorman/diary/35589
where issue numbers are linked.
I forgot to mention in the earlier message, please file any bug reports
at https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto
On 8/6/2015 2:07 PM, Antje wrote:
Forking the map style with stronger British road colours and then
getting that forked road style onto the main site once the default
style goes “international”.
After all, we didn’t call it “open” for nothing!
I'd approach this with caution, for two reasons
On 7/29/2015 6:52 PM, fors...@ozonline.com.au wrote:
Possibly tag it access=no and rename it to Track closed depending on
how widely the name Ant Track is known. It may be known as Ant Track
by a very small group of riders.
The name might not be Ant Track, but it's almost certainly not Track
On 7/27/2015 9:00 AM, Tom Lee wrote:
3. if they balk at this, ask for an attribution license, most likely a
pre-4.0 version of CC-BY
Pre-4.0 CC BY attribute requirements are clearly incompatible with
common attribution for multi-source maps, practices of data consumers
(including Mapbox), and
On 7/23/2015 8:54 PM, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
Does anyone know which of these (and others) are compatible with the
OSM license?
Very likely most of them are not released under open licenses.
Unfortunately, non-open data gets listed in OpenAddresses and there's no
assurance that you can combine
On 7/22/2015 11:43 AM, Daniel Begin wrote:
So far, I understand we have 2.5 votes for tagging trunk/motorway all
roads identified as “core route” in document (a); 0.5 against (I am
still torn between the two approaches!-)
More comments would be appreciated
Such an approach would be
On 7/16/2015 11:59 AM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
There are actually three thing you see onwww.openstreetmap.org: the
map data, the map tiles (rendering style), and the website itself.
There's a couple more
- Nominatim, used for Search and Where am I?
- Various routing engines, used for
On 7/16/2015 6:42 PM, Dongpo Deng wrote:
Does anyone have ideas why Facebook uses OSM for their checkin service
in some Asian countries including Taiwan, Japan, Korea, and China?
Probably one of the typical reasons, better data in what they care
about, different cost structure, or a different
The Vancouver OSM group will be meeting on Saturday at 11 AM on
Commercial Drive
We'll be mapping locations on Commercial Drive and enjoying the nice
summer weather outside. Use your favorite OpenStreetMap tool to do the
mapping, be it an app, notebook, GPS, or field papers.
People from all
On 7/13/2015 3:09 AM, Simon Poole wrote:
It is, as you may have seen from previous discussions, not clear if the
CC 4.0 licences are compatible (with the exception of CC0 naturally)
with the ODbL and this is likely not an issue that will be resolved
short term.
To clarify a bit, any CC
On 7/8/2015 2:40 AM, James wrote:
Has anyone else had issues with the conversion script from GML to osm?
I've been looking at the wiki here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geobase/Import_How-To
and when I try to convert the data python gives me the :
UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't
On 7/6/2015 6:42 PM, Andrew MacKinnon wrote:
Some of these notes are POIs that are visible on Mapillary but I
couldn't figure out exactly where they are (for instance, the sign on
a strip plaza shows there is a shop but I can't see exactly where it
is). You should probably keep these.
If you
I've been catching up on local notes, and have come across a few I'm not
sure how to resolve. There are a number which are equivalent to There
is a some name of shop somewhere in this block. While probably
correct, they're not very useful.
The notes aren't bug reports, the original intent of
On 7/4/2015 8:49 PM, Daniel Koć wrote:
Or maybe the donation was meant just to keep us running as we are
today with no further development plans?
The donation drive is for hardware resources, not for development
resources. In fact, development is defined as being outside the scope of
the
On 6/27/2015 1:14 PM, Fernando Trebien wrote:
Actually no, the server checks for circular dependencies, and a
relation pointing to itself is a cycle. Try it, the server returns a
validation error.
Nothing in the OSM data model prohibits a relation that references
itself, or relations that form
On 6/17/2015 1:12 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
* What is the imports history, particularly in relation to road network, POIs
and addresses? (Beyond what’s in the import catalogue page on the wiki, if
anything)
CanVec, National Hydrographic Network (NHN), and National Road Network
(NRN), all
On 6/17/2015 10:41 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
getmap works with so called public static image APIs, which are
provided by Mapquest and Google. AFAIR, OSM does *not* provide such
an API - at least at last time I checked. But, I've read that OSM now
provides direct routing. If they would also provide
On 6/14/2015 2:24 PM, Harald Kliems wrote:
Well, you've certainly motivated me to from now on always modify the
tiger:reviewed tag :-)
Thanks again for your efforts!
The most important change is probably setting appropriate surface
information. I don't know the exact secret sauce magic of
On 5/28/2015 11:25 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
With MapQuest it was much harder to find how can I report another bug.
Finally I have found Residential Map or Route Errors link on Support
page ( https://support.mapquest.com/hc/en-us - looks like the link
itself is dynamic, because it has issue
On 5/26/2015 2:00 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
Is anyone else using OSM to advocate for change (or preservation) in
their community? Could you share a sentence or two about what you are
doing and grant me permission to use it in my talk?
In England people are mapping in OpenStreetMap and then
On 5/23/2015 1:25 PM, Anders Anker-Rasch wrote:
Hi,
Who do I contact regarding investigations about a site potentially
using OSM data without proper credits?
Best regards,
Anders
If you don't want to contact them yourself, you can forward the
information to le...@osmfoundation.org
On 5/17/2015 3:14 PM, Daniel Koć wrote:
I have no idea how you'd apply P2P to map style design. It sounds like
you; ve heard of a great technology, and want to apply it to every
problem without fully understanding the technology and/or the problem.
I even used it once on OSM - it was called
On 5/15/2015 10:33 PM, Sajjad Anwar wrote:
Couple of things to keep in mind here -
1. We'd need open licensing, or it should say that tracing for
OpenStreetMap is permitted.
2. The layers should be in Web Mercator projection. There are quite a
few Bhuvan layers that are not.
There's two sides
On 5/15/2015 11:39 PM, Devdatta Tengshe wrote:
As far as I know, Bhuvan uses Tilecache.py to serve out Imagery in
tiles(http://tile1.nrsc.gov.in/tilecache/tilecache.py/1.0.0/bhuvan_imagery2/10/719/456.jpg).
The catch is that this imagery is in Geographic Latlong (i.e.
EPSG:4326) and not in Web
On 4/15/2015 6:01 AM, Ross wrote:
Hi Simon,
The issue is not with the licence. The current terms and conditions
require permission to add data not owned by the contributor.
This is incorrect. An appropriate license is sufficient. Some obviously
appropriate licenses are CC0, PDDL, ODC-BY and
On 4/7/2015 1:07 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
As you will have noticed by now, it's complicated. There is no truth
agreed to by both sides, so we may need two boundaries: one according
to Spain, and one according to Gib/UK. In between is disputed
territory. How do we handle that in other cases?
We
On 4/3/2015 10:06 PM, Eleanor Tutt wrote:
Paul - If perception of mapping in the US isn't aligning with reality,
we probably *do* need to do a better job as a chapter board of telling
the full story. I see what you mean about the blog posts, though I do
think your interpretation is a bit
On 4/3/2015 11:19 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Perhaps we, as the U.S. chapter, play a role in creating or sustaining
these false assumptions?
Yes. To substantiate this, I looked at communications from the US chapter
I looked through the current board term and the previous board term.
In the
On 3/29/2015 5:00 AM, Mark Bradley wrote:
Can I export these ways from OSM and then import them into OHM?
The main technical problem with moving data from one OSM API to another
(e.g. OSM to OHM, OSM to dev server, OSM to OpenGeoFiction) is making
sure to get rid of the OSM IDs, as the other
On 3/31/2015 11:02 AM, stevea wrote:
Part of the reason I do this is because other places you might
discover these data (subdivision names) are maps published by the
rail corporations. But, be careful. For example, I have found that
when I go to Union Pacific's web site to get a page that
On Mar 26, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Gerd Petermann gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Example: The ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99649911
and
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83504524
One has source=NRCan-CanVec-7.0, the other source=CanVec 6.0 - NRCan
Is there a good reason for this
Today version v2.29.0 of the OpenStreetMap Carto stylesheet has been
released.
Changes include
- An entirely new natural=tree and tree_row rendering, based on the
osm-fr style (#978)
- New water features styling (#991)
- Better matching of icon colours and text colours (#1354)
- Rendering
On 3/18/2015 4:20 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
Levittown, New York, for instance is a hamlet with a population of
over fifty thousand.
This is not a hamlet. Typically a hamlet would have less than 100-200
people. What you've described is a town or a city, this is regardless of
if it has
On 3/18/2015 2:43 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
Since you are involved with updating the rendering, can you tell us
the process to decide what should be rendered? I realize that part of
it must be stylistic, but what outside influences cause you to include
a tag as part of the standard rendered OSM
On 3/18/2015 2:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I'd like to point to the tagging mailing list, where there is
currently a discussion going on, whether the current voting system for
voting proposals should be changed.
Just as a clarification, this is for voting on what it takes to indicate
a
On 3/16/2015 11:33 PM, Andrew Errington wrote:
What is the problem? Is it a data problem or a mistake in the error
detector? It could be the access=yes tag (which means access is
permitted, although it's redundant).
Access=yes for what modes? I'd be surprised if it included
motor_vehicle,
There's going to be a Vancouver meetup near Metrotown on March 17. In
the great Saint Patrick's Day tradition, the theme is green locations,
but anything is welcome.
Bring your own device - laptop recommended.
More info and RSVP at
On 3/4/2015 3:38 PM, stevea wrote:
landuse in OSM should be the actual landuse, not the legally
permitted / designed landuse (zoning).
I do not disagree (meaning I agree), however: if my quarter-hectare
property of low density residential zoning has a house, fences, a
garage, lawns, a creek
On 3/3/2015 9:47 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
Are notes more-likely to be resolved when a dialogue is possible
(non-anonymous)? If the data suggests, for example, that anonymous
notes typically take 3 months to resolve, and non-anonymous notes take
36 hours, perhaps that would be sufficient
On 2/28/2015 4:07 AM, Hans De Kryger wrote:
The city of Escondido has this mega residential area. Just wondering why?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/33.1035/-117.0940
There's a few things going on here
One is that there has been an import or tracing from an official landuse
plan (e.g.
On 2/28/2015 9:45 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
Don't use prefixes or adulterate the ref with extra characters. Use
the network tag for that information.
http://taginfo.osm.org/search?q=network%3Dca_on_county
Although the lack of prefixes may be true for Ontario routes, it's worth
remembering that
The Great Lakes have been discussed a few times on the local lists and the
conclusion has been arrived at that they are best represented with
natural=coastline.
It's important to remember that the direction of coastline ways matters (land
on the left), and it is possible to look at a lake or
On 2/12/2015 6:46 AM, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
I happen to fix a lot of notes in Poland.
For me it would be impractical to check every POI that I add from notes.
It's for this reason that notes say This note includes comments from
anonymous users which should be independently verified.
This
On 2/10/2015 4:32 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I've completed their survey from a individual level, however will OSMF
be submitting an OSMF response? I'm not 100% across what exact
licensing conditions the data would need to be released under to leave
open the possibility of incorporating it
On 2/8/2015 2:33 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
OK, so not sure about other markets, but at least in the US, Domino's
Pizza has renamed itself to just Domino's. Which presents a few
issues, since they're not just pizza (they also do subs and wings, so
I'm not even sure how to cuisine tag these
On 2/4/2015 2:43 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
Yup, that cutoff number is going to be somewhere beyond 1,000 - and we
are fully planning to sell out the conference :)
Any idea what portion will be mappers and what will be companies or
other organizations? The feedback I've gotten is that the US
Paulo
(osm.org/relation/4551468) and in the south (osm.org/relation/4551469).
The tracksource redaction is temporarily paused, but should now be much
faster as it doesn't have to work with that mega-relation.
Paul Norman
For the OSMF Data Working Group
On 1/29/2015 9:38 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
First question, is their Creative Commons license [3] compatible with OSM? From
previous list traffic from SteveA regarding California government data I
believe that even if the CC license is not compatible with OSM the county data
will be licensed
On 1/26/2015 10:05 PM, Dmitry Kiselev wrote:
Is it a mistake or examples like this may be interpreted in some
usable way?
I would say there's no sensible interpretation of an interpolation way
with different nodes with different addr:street values.
On 1/26/2015 2:58 AM, Dave F. wrote:
I don't know when it was last reviewed, but does this error have bit
of a sensitive trigger? Has the server that runs the process been
upgraded so it can handle a greater number of requests? If so, could
the error's cut in point be relaxed?
The thresholds
On 1/25/2015 10:29 PM, Shekhar Krishnan wrote:
Via Topomancy, Sanjay Bhangar and I have a server with ample speed and
space to host openstreetmap.in http://openstreetmap.in and related
projects for at least one year. We are providing the same service to
OpenHistoricalMap.
OpenHistoricalMap
On 1/14/2015 10:17 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
To all OpenStreetMap US members:
Our new proposed bylaws are open for comments until **January 20th 3PM
Eastern**.
Will these new bylaws be compatible with getting Local Chapter status?
___
Talk-us mailing
On 1/13/2015 5:34 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
It looks like most of the place=city/town/village/hamlet POIs from
GNIS are tagged with 2000 Census populations in the population tag.
These population tags allow renderers to label places with font sizes
corresponding to population, which is a pretty
On 1/12/2015 1:30 AM, Steve Chilton wrote:
Can anyone help me with filtering OSM data please?
For a project I am working on I need data on my contributions to the
project.
How can I select ‘my contributions in UK’ and output as XML (or JSON?).
Need a file that can be imported in to
On 1/7/2015 7:21 PM, Stephan Knauss wrote:
We could start merging 3rd party ODbL into OSM
We can do so right now from a legal perspective. In fact, there are
imports of ODbL data that have taken place.
But then have a hard time to fulfill attribution requirements.
No - we'd attribute the same
On 1/6/2015 11:01 AM, Karel Charvat wrote:
Are the developers of Be-On-Road fullfilling their ODbl license
obligations by providing their data only in files with unknown format?
It depends. If they are not adding any data, they can simply point to
the source (planet.osm.org).
If they are
On 12/31/2014 2:14 PM, stevea wrote:
OSM uses WGS-84 as its default, and I erred in not realizing these
data are in NAD 27, so a conversion does seem to be necessary.
Not just by default - OSM is defined as only being in WGS84.
When you open them as-is with JOSM (+ Shapefile plug-in), you get
On 12/2/2014 3:22 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Your justification for this seems to be behaviour outside of this list
and/or, and this is the bit I take particular offense with,
The private responses to me have generally expressed that is part of a
pattern of behavior, and not an isolated incident.
On 12/2/2014 5:04 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
Am I to understand that felt Serge's comments were acceptable
behavior? I was expecting to find that you at least didn't condone it.
but sadly no where did you say Serge's comments were unacceptable.
No where did I say that his comments were acceptable
On 11/27/2014 2:11 AM, Lester Caine wrote:
Because the 'unclassified' icon is a dot, it is dropped on the building,
so the text is now below the building ... on the next one.
Shop text has always appeared below the icon - this is not new or unique
to the generic icon.
It is my customers who
On 11/24/2014 5:00 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I wonder why US States are tagged as admin_level=4, wouldn't it be
more consistent with the rest of the map to have them tagged as level 3?
admin_level=4 is consistent with Canada and Australia at the very least.
I believe it's also consistent
On 11/20/2014 1:57 PM, Leeds Tracker wrote:
Hello all,
I was about to upload a map exported from the main site (SVG using
Mapnik style) which I see is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0
Wikimedia Common's upload page requires 2.5, 3.0 or 4.0 (using
On 11/18/2014 10:11 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
mailto:m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
I would also like to highlight that we also now welcome associate
members who can help us occassionally or want to work on a
specific topic
On 11/17/2014 5:50 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote:
Is there any way to de-tile the data? I realise that most of Canada is
one giant water relation, but is there a data processing pipeline that
can recognize and join up split entities?
I looked at this, but it's better to go back to the original
On 11/11/2014 10:29 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I've created a set of tiles from US Forest Service road data for the
155 US National Forests.
It's worth noting that a green area denotes a US National Forest, which
does not imply it's got trees, which is necessary for an OSM forest.
Thanks
On 11/11/2014 10:29 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I've created a set of tiles from US Forest Service road data for the
155 US National Forests.
It's worth noting that a green area denotes a US National Forest, which
does not imply it's got trees, which is necessary for an OSM forest.
Thanks
On 11/9/2014 8:48 AM, Steve Singer wrote:
What is the current procedure for meeting the attribution requirement
of a municipal data-source released under the 'Open Government Licence ?
Unfortunately each Open Government License is different, and when I've
asked about license compatibility
On 11/1/2014 3:05 PM, Richard Weait wrote:
I read this article recently and It got me thinking. Do we devalue
community members, or potential community members who don't drink?
A quote from the article, When alcohol is currency, non-alcoholic
drinks are considered valueless, and the interests
On 10/27/2014 4:47 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
Picking up on Paul's offer to help along the discussion here [1]. Also
copying Steve here as he's renewed his call for better addressing in
OpenStreetMap - which I entirely agree with [2].
Feedback from this thread is incorporated on the wiki [2] -
On 10/27/2014 5:19 PM, Alex Barth wrote:
According to the interpretation in column 1, the ODbL doesn't imply
any specific licensing for geocoding results, they are Produced Works.
A geocoding result is not the same as a database of geocoding results.
Column 1 says the former is a produced
With the recent interest in the OSMF, I'm hoping to capitalize on this
and boost working group participation.
There's a full list of the working groups at
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Groups, but I'll go over the
list, and skills useful for participation. These aren't official,
On 10/27/2014 9:32 AM, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 27 Oct 2014 16:16, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
mailto:penor...@mac.com wrote:
With the recent interest in the OSMF, I'm hoping to capitalize on
this and boost working group participation.
Hi Paul,
As I'm too lazy to look up
On 10/27/2014 2:46 PM, Michael Reichert wrote:
No. CC-BY requires an attribution at every use of the data. That's why
it is not compatible to our ODbL/Contributor Terms. OSM requires only an
attribution of OpenStreetMap contributors and nobody else from its
data users.
We have some government
On Oct 23, 2014, at 03:00 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
I think it is reasonable postpone elections for three months considering
current turmoil.
Leaving aside any question about the merits of this, I don't believe it is
possible. Notice has been given of the AGM, and an
This a reminder to candidates that board members need to be members, not
associate members. You should contact members...@osmfoundation.org to change
your status from associate member to member if needed. I am not sure what would
happen if someone with the most votes was not eligible to be a
Alex, the LWG would love to work with you on fixing any confusing if you're
interested in resuming work on the guideline - currently it lies abandoned with
the feedback needing to be integrated.
On Oct 22, 2014, at 05:33 AM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Steve - would love to work on
On 10/19/2014 1:40 PM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
What's required to switch this from demo to used on default osm.org
layer ?
I don't believe anyone is currently evaluating alternatives to the
current stack for tile.osm.org.
I think most of those who might are busy with vector tiles these days.
On Tuesday October 28th, there will be an OpenStreetMap meetup held in
Vancouver.
http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Vancouver/events/214167332/
We'll be holding it in the Bread Garden in Metrotown
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257886760), with convenient access to
transit and nearby
On 10/11/2014 3:48 PM, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
Here’s my question, and this needs to be clarified (probably deserves its own
thread):
Who is responsible for deciding what action needs to be taken in the case of
CoC violations?
A CoC without a body willing and able to enforce it is just
On 10/8/2014 8:49 PM, Jo Walsh wrote:
Okay, my gloss on this is that the Code of Conduct is a kind of
shibboleth and a kind of insurance policy.
You need one in order to be seen taking this stuff seriously
The argument raised recently was that having a CoC helps diversity, and
is not a
On 10/7/2014 10:51 AM, Charlotte Wolter wrote:
Also, all have editing experience with OSM, whether
in the United States or outside.
I would not consider someone who has not made a single edit in the last
12 months to have editing experience in the context of a local chapter
election. This is
On 10/5/2014 6:26 PM, Alan McConchie wrote:
All of the candidates have made more than zero edits
While true that all candidates have edited OSM at some point in the
past, two of them have zero edits in the last year, and one of those has
no US edits ever.[1]
While a candidate may have other
On 10/3/2014 8:28 AM, Richard Weait wrote:
Paul, did you take alternate accounts into consideration, or only one
uid per candidate?
I only used the user that was linked from the candidate list. I
considered multiple IDs, but I didn't expect it to make a significant
difference for my uses. E.g.
I decided to conduct an rudimentary analysis on the edits of the current
OSM
US board candidates, similar to something I did last year. When considering
the qualifications of someone on the board which sets direction for the
local chapter, it is certainly useful to their experience as an OSM
On 9/26/2014 9:57 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
This is not really appropriate since the main map rendering stylesheet
still takes ref tags from ways to paint the route number shields.
There is work underway to take that information from route relations
On 9/19/2014 7:00 AM, Bryan Housel wrote:
We really should come up with a good way to make authoritative data
harder to edit in the various editors.
All that a particular data source can be authoritative for is what that
data source says something is. What is authoritative for OSM is the
On 9/19/2014 6:19 AM, Reilly, Colin wrote:
A single building cannot straddle two tax parcels.
This seems incorrect. If I build a structure on two tax parcels, it can
exist as a single building. It may not be legal, or may require planning
tricks that make it two buildings in the eyes of the
On 9/17/2014 7:33 AM, Dave F. wrote:
I wouldn't describe size based ordering as 'well defined'.
The polygon table has no column or combination of columns which is
guaranteed to be unique. We only need to have a well defined ordering
within a meta-tile that is consistent across boundaries, not
On Sep 16, 2014, at 06:33 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 16/09/2014 13:41, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
In general, we render smaller landuse on top of larger landuse.
I find it surprising something as arbitrary as size is used as the
defining factor. Comparing actual tags
On 9/15/2014 9:45 AM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
Supporting multiple values natively in the osm data model would
provide a clean and efficient solution, but updating all the tools to
support it would be a huge undertaking.
It's not going to get supported by most data consumers. This isn't a
On 9/15/2014 10:29 AM, colliar wrote:
Of course we could define some escape character
like the famous backslash but ... I don't even want to write that stupid
idea down.
Do not think that is stupid but one solution for a rare situation. If it
is properly described on the wiki, there should be
On 9/15/2014 7:03 PM, Jack Burke wrote:
As the wiki doesn't specifically say *don't* put a space after the
semicolon, I didn't see a problem with doing it. [1]
The standard is to use ; without a space as a delimiter. This is what
both iD and JOSM use.
On 9/12/2014 3:24 PM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
To me there's very little semantic value in distinguishing between
name_2 and alt_name. Even old_name and loc_name arguably don't bring
much to the table (I do see the nuance, but it doesnt seem to be worth
the complication). We've got the same
On 9/8/2014 11:18 AM, Cristian Consonni wrote:
it has been some days that, when I visit openstreetmap.org, I am shown
a nice box reminding me that SoTM is coming soon (see screenshot[1]),
is there a way to use this system to promote local events (say local
State of the Map conferences?).
There
201 - 300 of 952 matches
Mail list logo
