OAuth library
in ActionScript 1.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Very-Happy-Looking-forward-tp5717753p5718196.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
talk mailing
back I wrote
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ/ODbL
and threw it out for review by people.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/ODbL-Attribution-tp5717937p5717949.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list arch
The global pass has now started. The redaction bot is at 180° longitude
and working east. The North Pole, South Pole and Poland have been
exempted from this pass and won't be redacted until Tuesday at the earliest.
cheers
Richard
___
talk ma
follow-ups go to the relevant
local mailing list only. :)
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
tory but not at another. This has
been fixed so will should succeed on a future pass. As Robert has mentioned,
London (east) has succeeded.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Update-on-redaction-bot-and-minutely-diffs-tp5716307p5716818.html
Sent from th
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:41 AM, NopMap wrote:
> What exactly does the status "failed" mean?
Sometimes it means a timeout of some sort. Other times it means data
was found that was unexpected in some way.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Redaction_bot_progress_map
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 9:16 AM, kenneth gonsalves
wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 11:46 +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> The redaction bot has started on the 'Western Europe' area. Because
>> continents are annoyingly not shaped like rectangles,
>
> this is not go
hen
the bot is rerun for that area.
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
https://github.com/systemed/iD
Throw questions at me (on dev@) or just get started and hack away.
Between us we can build something really good.
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 12/07/2012 14:24, Roland Olbricht wrote:
Thank you very much. Now it works fine, great work.
Thank Andy, Tom and Frederik. I'm just the messenger!
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetma
Roland Olbricht wrote:
> This is not a problem of the rendering server backlog.
> It is a problem of the minute diff generation.
...which has now been fixed. :)
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Redaction-process-is-hogging-up-the-tile-ren
@ when Australia ends and the rest of the world begins
- to talk@ when the rest of the world ends
...and, of course, if anything interrupts the progress of the redaction
more than briefly. All updates will be cc:ed to announce@.
cheers
Richard
___
talk
We are expecting to begin on _Wednesday_ (9th July)
11th July. You knew what I meant really. :)
Yours in a state of temporary temporal confusion
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
were expecting this to start just after 1st April and the
complexity of the task incurred the delay. Thank you all very much for
your patience in waiting for it to get underway. Thank you especially to
those who have contributed to the code, whether by patches, suggestions
or just helping to
ling
(I guess we could add that if desired) but just hands your search string off
to Nominatim.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/How-to-move-Potlatch-map-to-specific-coordinates-whilst-editing-without-zooming-out-tp5714535p5714536.html
Sent
john whelan wrote:
> Could someone or a group come up with a more standard set of icons please?
http://sjjb.co.uk/mapicons/
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Icons-tp5714357p5714433.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.
http://www.bing.com/community/site_blogs/b/maps/archive/2012/06/25/released-our-largest-satellite-publication.aspx
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[followups set to legal-talk, but you may want to adjust to talk-us if
focusing on LA etc.]
On 21/06/2012 17:57, Alan Mintz wrote:
Richard wrote:
...Given people's constraints on time and the community's
(understandable) desire for the redaction to get underway asap...
I'
urope and who have NO IDEA
how empty the USA is... have never been to mid-Wales.
Which is a shame, because mid-Wales is lovely.
Sorry, where was I?
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Import-guidelines-review-tp5711550p5712204.html
Sent from th
g means "OMG OSM
MISCLASSIFIES FOREST TRACKS AS HIGHWAYS". *facepalm*
I've written a bit more about it at
http://www.systemeD.net/blog/index.php?post=23
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/TomTom-is-thumping-us-tp5710461p5710467.ht
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 3:42 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen wrote:
[ ... ]
> However, it was not meant that the data were simply to be copied, deleted
> and re-pasted into the map using a fake account.
True. Copy / pasting is not the same as remapping from permitted sources.
ng to validate Worst Fixer (though I'm pleased he's stopped the
"Ich" double-bluff ;) ), we need the smart guys like you, Ian, to do things
_properly_ - which includes documentation on the wiki - so that we can exert
pressure on the less skilled to follow your lead.
cheers
Richard
e wiki.
https://github.com/mapnik/mapnik/wiki/Code-sprint
Now. Talk about how much fun you are going to have when you come the
the code sprint.
See you in DC,
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
, and
probably advise people not to go round deleting things if there's no
immediate need.
Some of this won't be resolved until there's been some tool development,
and as RichardF is wont to remind us, that doesn't happen by itself.
Richard
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:20 PM
y when we only had a
few mappers and barely usable tools, and we needed to grow our coverage as
fast as possible. That's not the case now. We can spend the time to map
things properly (hippy), and we should.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Cyclew
Off-carriageway tracks tend to be bidirectional (they all are in the UK).
So no-one would bother to use bidirectional_track.
Richard
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:56 PM, wrote:
> Arg, thats still not right is it? Firstly it leaves 2 values for
> cycleway:left and also the opposite_track
I don't know when bicycle:backward=yes appeared - I've always used
oneway:bicycle=no
(and taginfo puts it as 131 to 4831 uses, so I'm not the only one)
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:59 AM, wrote:
> It has been pointed out that some of these may be due to one-way roads
> (and as there are more count
We do it for motorised vehicles.
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Andy Robinson wrote:
> But why does this need special treatment? We don’t do it for any other
> mode of transport.
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Richa
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> But as yet I haven't understood what point you're trying to make in this
> thread. Without trying to be obtuse... can you explain?
>
> cheers
> Richard
>
That there are legitimate ways of classifying cycle rou
Richard Mann wrote:
> You'd have to ask the City of Utrecht whether their "main cycle routes"
> are signed.
Well, ok, I wasn't really asking what "I'd have to ask", more what "your
point is". :)
If the routes are signed, that's good. If th
You'd have to ask the City of Utrecht whether their "main cycle routes" are
signed. If they've officially identified a particular set of routes, that
would seem to be fairly clear-cut. See their city website:
http://www.utrecht.nl/images/dso/infraprojecten/fiets/fietsroutes.htm
Richard Mann wrote:
> My point is that tagging should allow both types of routes to be
> recorded
We tag what's on the ground, whether it's route signage, cycle-specific
infrastructure, or a giant woolly mammoth (http://url.ie/f9ts).
Are you suggesting a deviation from that?
tagged and rendered accordingly); I just thought it
interesting to note that that difference was also regarded as obvious in a
major Dutch city.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
missing a trick or two.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
well as having a beaming smile.
I enjoyed learning more about Neskie's life and interests from his
friends and colleagues in their video tribute to him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpflF16Syvo
Best regards,
Richard
http://www.inmemoriam.ca/view-announcement-242162-neskie-arrow-manuel.html
The City of Toronto Open Data team held an event last week[1] to
celebrate the second year of their Open Data program and to discuss
how it might be improved. Visualizations were the hot topic, featured
in two of the three main topics of discussion.
- Are visualizations using City of Toronto data
That's why you need to know the lower of the two classifications being
linked (so you can put the link just under the lower one)
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, AJ Ashton wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Maarten Deen wrote:
> > Is this behaviour of mapnik wanted? As I said: IMHO it is n
ought to be fixed, so this
information is offered on a tag-what-you-like basis, rather than a
render-as-I-do basis.
Richard
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
> I finally found out what the issue is with this [1] situation. My issue
> with it is that IMHO it is not good
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Ramiro Cosentino wrote:
>
>
> 2012/4/27 Serge Wroclawski
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ramiro Cosentino
>> wrote:
>> > Hello list,
>> >
>> > I'm new to OSM and I love it! Not sure if this is the right list to post
>> > about this
>> > but here it goes:
>
data, and nor should
it be. This would be much better stored in an externally hosted .osm file or
shapefile, which can be loaded into the editor/tool of your choice, than in
the main database.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Bing-c
fix it. The good news: one of the
> prisoners on death row turned out to be innocent while we were fixing
> it."
> :)
"Caedite eos - novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius..."
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
n.org/2012/04/26/license-change-still-ongoing/ .
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Licence-status-in-Potlatch2-and-data-deletion-tp5667829p5667847.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archi
Mapnik can't handle one-sided cycle lanes (yet). Even when it does, it may
take Andy some time to implement it.
Maperitive can (but only for smaller areas):
http://www.transportparadise.co.uk/cyclemap/?zoom=3&lat=51.74126&lon=-1.25403&layers=B0
Richard
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012
I've only just noticed that cycleway=track now renders on OCM, which means
you get a more realistic picture of Copenhagen/Frederiksburg :
http://www.opencyclemap.org/?zoom=17&lat=55.68659&lon=12.5642&layers=B00
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
ing to do with OSM(F) board approval. As explained at
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2012/04/05/license-change-update-getting-it-right/
, the coders working on the rebuild code are ironing out a few final issues
before the process can begin.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
htt
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Elena ``of Valhalla''
wrote:
> Hello
>
> Are there any news on a date when we can expect that any data that
> is going to be deleted is no longer in the database?
The most-recent update is here:
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2012/04/05/license-change-update-getti
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:57 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> If you start having some tiles where the produced work is CC by-sa with the
> underlying data also cc by-sa and some where the produced work is cc by-sa
> with the underlying data ODbL, how do you do attribution for each tile
> differently?
In
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> If the tiles are not regenerated then they will contain elements that are
> licensed as cc by-sa only.
"Old tiles", the tiles generated at osm.org right now, are created
from a CC-By-SA data base and are CC-By-SA tiles. No problem.
> If you m
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:49 PM, ThomasB wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the Update, Richard. It is much appreciated that the
> information flow works.
>
> I have a question with regards to the map at osm.org. When the database is
> clean, it would also need a re-rendering of all ti
Update from Richard F
Original
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2012/04/05/license-change-update-getting-it-right/
License change update: getting it right
Posted on April 5, 2012 by RichardF
With the new server successfully installed by our sysadmin team, we’re
now onto the second part of our
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> But it's not actually costing them anything? They would be putting the
> images up anyway, so THEY are the only ones who gain by getting back free
> vectorized data?
No donor to OSM gets special terms or access to the data.
You and I donate d
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> http://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet-120401.osm.bz2.md5
>
> Is that going to be torrented? I would think many people want a copy...
Somebody could, I suppose.
Of course, I should have linked to the file, not the md5. Oops. :-)
__
contact
this year between Microsoft and OSMF.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Truth-about-media-hype-in-Microsoft-lending-big-support-and-big-dollars-to-OSM-tp5615717p5615807.html
Sent from the General D
The last "Old Server" planet is up now. This planet was generated
after the API move to Read-Only.
http://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet-120401.osm.bz2.md5
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
> It moved to the "Edit" tab. Hover over the edit tab with your mouse
> (don't click) and a menu will pop up with the data layer option. IMO
> it should be moved back to the layer selection. Hovering over the edit
> tab is about as unintuitive as
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
> OSM is in read-only mode as of 8:02 UTC. Looking at the minutely
> replication files, this was the last changeset to upload:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11173886
>
> Let's all wish the hard working admins good luck.
And a "t
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> On 23/03/2012 13:47, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote:
>
> On 3/23/2012 8:36 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
>
> User chdr (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chdr) seems to be running a
> script to automatically replace street name abbreviations wit
that sort of functionality yourself).
Richard
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:53 AM, LM_1 wrote:
> I have created a new proposal for group relation (type). It is
> intended to reduce tagging duplication and make it easier to map dense
> public transport areas by grouping ways that are use
drama queen on the lists, and
in turn, I hope you'll all accept this friendly "calm down, dear" in the
spirit in which it was intended.
cheers
Richard
[cross-posted, please consider trimming follow-ups if replying]
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
s internal dataset to the server". Adding a check
here is a bit of a sticking plaster - it works but it doesn't fix the
underlying problem. I'd rather see if, with the help of some steps to
reproduce, we can fix 1 and/or 2 first before resorting to 3.
cheers
Richard
_
Potlatch 2 (which are entirely different codebases and have different
components in trac). When someone identifies reliable steps to reproduce in
P2, we try and fix it and indeed have done in some cases IIRC.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Way-
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2012/03/19/esri-donation/
http://www.esri.com/news/releases/12-1qtr/esri-donation-supports-collaboration-with-openstreetmap-community.html
Thanks Esri!
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap
xist, and the best way to fix that is by creating it. That's
it.
I think Dominik's request is entirely reasonable and I'm a little hacked off
with the negative-verging-on-paranoid response here. If you don't like it,
move on to the next thread and just don't answer the f
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Dominik Wilmsen wrote:
> We would like to invite you to participate in a survey on motivations
> and obstacles to contribute
> geographic information to
> OpenStreetMap. OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project to create a
> free editable map of the world.
Dear OS
nation of the licence than anything found elsewhere. I'm not
sure what more you might want - a looped .wav of Brian Blessed shouting
"OPPPNSTRETMP" and reading out every contributor's name?
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
[ ... ]
> I fiddled around with the code and it's no problem to just add it, but I'm
> hesitant to submit a patch if the majority doesn't agree.
>
> Should I set up a poll?
No. You should join the License Working Group. :-)
ey are ‘we look forward to working with Apple to
get that on there.’ A little civility goes a long way (in my book). I’m
quite sick of the mudslinging in this space."
Thanks to everyone who's put the hours in today, to all the coders and
sysadmins who sweat blood
On 08/03/2012 10:41, Yves wrote:
I think this is part of the fun searching for the datasource, there is
no attribution, right?
Indeed. A couple of us are having discussions about how to get this
addressed. Stay tuned.
cheers
Richard
___
talk
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
Looks like they're using a old (pre-2011) planet dump for the data.
Yep, we've now pinned it down to 1st-7th April 2010.
cheers
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.or
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Seems to be TIGER in the States but OSM in lots of other places...
...and the consensus is that the data is from some time late March/early
April 2010. Yes, really.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/iPhoto-for-iOS-
Spod wrote:
> http://512pixels.net/iphoto-for-ios-not-using-google-maps/
http://www.refnum.com/tmp/apple.html (thanks Dair!) will show you the tiles
they're using.
Seems to be TIGER in the States but OSM in lots of other places...
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
ht
es for a week or two, perhaps, or continue to serve
pre-changeover tiles for Australia (there's no licensing reason not to)
until the datasets approach parity. AIUI, and I stand to be corrected,
Foursquare's tiles are actually prerendered rather than being rendered on
demand, so this is
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:19 PM, mick wrote:
> I need to build a database of a subset of features from a specific area,
> storing them in a series of tables according to feature type (eg. natural,
> historic, waterway, ...) from predefined subsets of the planet file.
>
> In doing this I hope to
Philip Barnes wrote:
> in an unknown village if you want to find the pub, head for the church.
Or in a cathedral city...:
http://www.imbibit.co.uk/
(shame it's a Google map, though)
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Map-Co-ordinates-for-t
e to the centre of town, to help rendering). And you should choose
your own centre of the town for measurement purposes. I suppose we could
crowdsource a set of zeropoints if someone comes up with an appropriate
tag. Just don't expect the place tags to be in the same location.
Richard
On Fr
Ulf's family have asked if we can help find the killer(s). Some bank
machine photos of those stealing Ulf's money after the nurder are
pretty clear. Police are looking for people who can identify these
suspects especially in Eastern Germany, Poland and Lithuania.
http://ulf-m.blogspot.com/
Let
r they'll be able to use your
contributions under the new licence and terms. Most people don't seem to
have a problem with clicking the button but there are one or two that do.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Contact-And-Remap-Campaign-tp
pect the data change on 1st
April to follow it very closely.
> Possibility of considering undecided as accepted (if they don't respond)
Completely not going to happen. Anyone suggesting that needs to read some
law. You absolutely cannot do that [1].
cheers
Richard
[1] slight proviso: in the
New OSM data-collection software for Android:
Collects GPX track tiles
Collects voice notes
Collects text notes
Collects photos
Have a look.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ian Darwin
My osm tracker for Android is (finally!) ready for people to play with
before I put it into the M
e
issues, has strong opinions on them, and just hasn't clicked the button
either way (such as sherbourne and 80n in the UK), I won't have any
compunction about replacing their edits. There's an outside possibility on
2nd April that I'll have wasted my time, but that's
th posting the usernames on the national mailing list (so, talk-gb in
this instance). People there might know of the "lost" mappers you're trying
to contact.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Contact-And-Remap-Campaign-tp5456674p545
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Michael Collinson wrote:
[ ... ]
> Meanwhile, you can use the OSMI License View tool to get started. Here is an
> incomplete list I just grabbed using it:
>
> Exponent, Brent Miller, cetest, osmapb1, Tinono, rendle, Tinono, EvaStern,
> robbert, Sidneyleenen, Elle_M
I wrote:
> A brief interruption from your scheduled programming.
Haha. I'm an idiot. Sent to the wrong list.
*pours coffee on in effort to wake up*
cheers
Richard
(whispering) the point still remains, though ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Criti
ead to refrain
from using emotive words like "ridiculous", "hypocrisy" and "vandalism".
Remember too that, though you might not agree with them, there are a lot of
people working hard on this, and just because your opinion differs on the
implementation, it doesn't actu
've helped with
this. We'll be continuing to refine the site in the forthcoming weeks, but
we're happy that it's ready to launch now. So - OSM army, get to it and
promote it :)
cheers
Richard
[sent to talk@ and dev@, please trim follow-ups]
__
Mapnik handles layers and
bridges.
So instead I add links_lower and links_higher tags, and render (both order
and colour) on the basis of the contents of the links_lower tag.
Perhaps the rendering gods prefer Mapnik to be a bit crap, so cartographers
can add value by doing something better. Who knows.
David Earl wrote:
> BTW, the response to 'why don't you do this' is so often 'why don't
> you do it yourself'.
Oh, absolutely. I don't think that was meant as a criticism. @osmblogs is a
great idea.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
htt
Memorial page for Ulf. Please share your memories.
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2012/01/18/ulf-m%C3%B6ller-1973-2012/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
it too and I've pushed a fix, will
hopefully be live soon.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch-licence-status-highlighting-wrong-tp7199815p7199954.html
Sent from the General Discussion maili
SimonPoole wrote:
> (I've been petitioning RichardF to have it turned on be default,
> but that isn't the case AFAIK).
It'll be on by default when I get a spare minute.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/what-is-happening-
ct mapped by someone who's refused the new CTs a dark
red outline; those who've neither refused nor accepted get an orange one.
More details on the wiki I think.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/what-is-happening-here-potlatch-oddness-with-o
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:28 AM, John Sturdy wrote:
> As long as the tagging used is such that things that no longer exist
> are not normally rendered (and only show as thin outlines on standard
> editors) I think including historic data shouldn't be a problem.
> Compared with the amount of modern
Just announced. Tokyo, Japan will host SotM 2012, 06-09 September 2012.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
American Civil War mapping projects with it.
richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
nity had to say about a place, then go to Google if I
wanted to know what the bots had found.
Richard
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Michal Migurski wrote:
> On Dec 30, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
> > In fact, many of those arguing for OSM becoming a nice map portal
&
ing. This is a single level shopping mall,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/68282457
A very determined Toronto mapper has added shops in the multi-level
Eaton Centre, shops and walkways are marked with level=
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4321312
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Thomas Davie wrote:
>> First of all, one would have to define the exact difference between "OSM is
>> providing maps" and "another project is providing maps". Why exactly would
>> OSM have to provide maps;
>
> Perhaps because that's the original, and stated purp
hat
sort of peple you get.
Richard
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
> Thanks for the list, Frederick - a few worthwhile things to talk about here.
>
> On Dec 24, 2011, at 5:02 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> Our admins have recently published a list of "top ten tasks",
>> technical things they'd like to see imp
...100%!
And the order for the new server has been placed.
Have a happy Christmas everyone.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/97-2-tp7123532p7123971.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com
501 - 600 of 2093 matches
Mail list logo
