[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: Oplijsting fietssnelwegen - hulp gezocht

Hi, The Fietsersbond would like to know how much of the Fietsostrades are already realized. They are looking for some volunteers to help them do that. Problem is that nobody really knows, and Fietsersbond needs to know this to be able to give an estimate of their cost to inventarize the network

[OSM-talk-be] meet mappers in Aalter

, join us there. The best way to let us know you're coming is by registering at the meetup event page [2] Hope to see you there! 1: https://github.com/osmbe/community_planning/issues/2 2: https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/253573777/ -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <h

Re: [OSM-talk-be] integrated Routeplanner GraphHopper on osm.org strange result

u/s/AJy Of course, nodes can also have an effect on routing. For example, you could add the code below to query barrier nodes which have an access tag but not a foot tag. node["barrier"]["access"][!"foot"] -- Joost Schouppe _

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Vakbondskantoren: office=labor_union of office=trade_union ?

). >> >> >> Groeten, >> >> Denis >> >> >> ___ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> > ___

Re: [OSM-talk-be] integrated Routeplanner GraphHopper on osm.org strange result

the road to highway=construction + construction=cycleway. Given the description in the Note, that seems to be more correct than the current tagging. -- Joost Schouppe ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-be] streetname changes (and a community to-do list)

Hmm, define start_date. If Aalter swallows up Knesselare, is that a new start date or not? Anyway, if you want to know the start date of municipalities in Belgium, I'd recommend contacting Statbel, in Flanders try Agentschap Binnenlands Bestuur. Op di 24 jul. 2018 om 11:23 schreef Pieter Vander

[OSM-talk] build your own routing options in Osmand (an idea for your OSM meetups)

ithub.io/blob/master/routing_radical_hiking.xml 7: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1cqpL5NedjF5lIzoPLA_X5-YE0tkZYX4ciczUsO8W1g8/edit#slide=id.g3a6c728807_0_122 8: https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/blob/master/routing/routing.xml -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.or

[OSM-talk-be] build your own routing options in Osmand (an idea for your OSM meetups)

ithub.io/blob/master/routing_radical_hiking.xml 7: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1cqpL5NedjF5lIzoPLA_X5-YE0tkZYX4ciczUsO8W1g8/edit#slide=id.g3a6c728807_0_122 8: https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-resources/blob/master/routing/routing.xml -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.or

Re: [OSM-talk-be] streetname changes (and a community to-do list)

Hi, Most of the work on street names has been done already, which you can admire here: https://www.mapcontrib.xyz/t/2d975c-Geplande_adreswijzigingen_gemeentefusies One more thing to think about: new municipality polygons. I suppose we just create a new one for each of the new municipalities.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] streetname changes (and a community to-do list)

an addr:street tag identical to the current name tag of those highways. Then there's also the (probably few) streetname relations to think about. Op di 10 jul. 2018 om 12:00 schreef Jakka : > Op 9/07/2018 om 11:25 schreef joost schouppe: > > Hi, > > > > As you may know, there ar

Re: [OSM-talk-be] streetname changes (and a community to-do list)

There is now an interactive map of the work already done: https://www.mapcontrib.xyz/t/2d975c-Geplande_adreswijzigingen_gemeentefusies It works by querying things with a "proposed:name" and "fixme:name"="WikiProject_Belgium/Municipality_Fusions". So only if the you add those tags, your edits will

[OSM-talk-be] streetname changes (and a community to-do list)

Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Bel

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSGeo.be-Announce] FOSS4G.be - save the date - 25/10/2018 !

And if there are enough OSM related proposals, we'll probably have a special OSM track again! -- Forwarded message - From: Johan Van de Wauw Date: do 7 jun. 2018 22:20 Subject: [OSGeo.be-Announce] FOSS4G.be - save the date - 25/10/2018 ! To: Hello everyone, After succesful

[OSM-talk-be] SPW PICC, orthophotos and terrain model now available for tracing

or not the SPW standard license is compatible with OSM or not. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Nodes or areas to tag amenities

gt;> >> >>> triggers >> >> >>> the JOSM validator and probably some QC tools. Secondly renderers >> >> >>> might have >> >> >>> trouble placing the icons and house numbers of multiple areas like >> >> >>> this.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM Belgium Local Chapter application, community feedback wanted

2018-03-30 23:44 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Pettiaux : > Munch thanks Joost for having initiated this registration process. It is a > great idea. > Thanks, but it is a community effort, but most of the praise should go towards Ben Abelshausen. He did the initial work to find out what

[OSM-talk-be] OSM Belgium Local Chapter application, community feedback wanted

Martijn from the OpenStreetMap Foundation had some trouble reaching talk-be, so I'm sending this message on his behalf. Please keep his mail in the conversation! --- French / Dutch below. Hi all, You may be aware that OSMbe has applied to become an official Local Chapter of the OpenStreetMap

[OSM-talk-be] volunteers needed in Mons, Namur and Liege for the national mapathon

ction", walking around to look for problems and validating data. Reply here, in a private mail or register on Meetup (and be sure to mention the city/cities you could help out): https://www.meetup.com/nl-NL/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/247922954/ -- Joost Schouppe OpenStree

Re: [Talk-es] Artículo: Why OpenStreetMap is in serious trouble

en otras cosas si que estoy de acuerdo, las importaciones son >> difíciles y es bastante complicado combatir el vandalismo. >> >> >> ___ >> Talk-es mailing list >> Talk-es@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tal

Re: [OSM-talk-be] trage wegen in het Dendermondse

deze in Alken die óók allemaal zijn >> opgenomen en de tag historical=path meegekregen. Hierbij staat specifiek >> trail_visibility ingevuld. >> >> >> >> >> Op 21 februari 2018 om 18:26 schreef joost schouppe < >> joost.schou...@gmail.com>: >> >&

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSM-talk] Highway=trunk : harmonization between countries ?

us in verba." ___ talk mailing list t...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joos

[OSM-talk-be] trage wegen in het Dendermondse

enregister. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStr

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

This discussion shows once again how great we are at generating smart ideas. That definitely is not our problem. But all ideas are equal and will only get executed if the one who posited them executes them. As the project becomes more complex, that means you can either play in a corner by

[OSM-talk-be] national mapathon 2018

:) Sign up for volunteering through the meetup page: https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/247922954/ To just come map with us, you'll be able to sign up through: http://nationalmapathon2018.eventbrite.com (site will be up in a few days) -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <h

Re: [OSM-talk-be] low emission zones

As you can see here, some parts of it is, and some of it isn't: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7966961#map=17/51.19473/4.40380 ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] low emission zones

s involved in this fine-tuning in my previous job. We still need to translate the access restrictions into tags. -- Joost Schouppe ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk-be] temporary cycle routes

@Ben: I was also thinking about proposed, but I don't like how this is not in the main tag. Instead of route=bicycle + state=proposed, I would prefer something like route:proposed=bicycle. Then you automatically break data-use that hasn't heared about these 2000 objects worldwide that have a

[OSM-talk-be] temporary cycle routes

ces, parts are completely ready, but then just stop. And in some cases, there is an "official detour" of the fietsostrade. So while the infrastructure is not there yet, in a sense the route is already there. How do you think this should be mapped, if at all? -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] low emission zones

, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:52 AM, joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> There are now two low emission zones in Belgium, neither of which is >> mapped. You will find all the needed info to map them on this wiki page: >> >> https://wik

[OSM-talk-be] low emission zones

Hi, There are now two low emission zones in Belgium, neither of which is mapped. You will find all the needed info to map them on this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dlow_emission_zone#Belgium Anyone up to the challenge? -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <h

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Overpass turbo exporteren as png

> > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Tw

[OSM-talk-be] fietsknooppunten onder een nieuwe licentie

://data.toerismevlaanderen.be/datasets?q=datasets%5B0%5D=category%3Aroutes%20%26%20tours -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603&

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] place=square & highway tag

Merci pour les commentaires. J'avais l'impression que quelqu'un n'a fait que supprimé les erreurs, sans s'occuper de cartographier de façon correcte. Je suis content de comprendre que c'est plus ou moins le cas. C'est surtout la Place de la Liberation qui etait problematique, car la, ce n'etait

[OSM-talk-fr] place=square & highway tag

%3Dsquare -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Bel

[OSM-talk-be] doctoral public defense

that :) -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Bel

[OSM-talk] OSM science mailing list

://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2018-January/004995.html -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <

[OSM-talk-be] OSM science mailing list

://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2018-January/004995.html -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <

Re: [OSM-talk] Automatically generated changeset discussion comments by OSMCha

> OSMCha late last year and find it helpful, especially being able to see > what was deleted. > > Stefan - Thank you for offering a suggestion on how OSMCha can be > improved. > > Best, > Clifford > > -- > @osm_seattle > osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us > OpenStreetMap:

[OSM-talk-be] upcoming events: Brussels, Hasselt, Louvain-la-Neuve, Arlon, ...

/ -- Joost Schouppe ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] Open Belgium

ions. Hope to see you there! -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStr

Re: [OSM-talk] no osmf-talk link at listinfo

Tom, It is meant to be readable for non-members, right? So what exactly has the fact you can't post as a non-OSMF member to do with being or not being listed on listinfo? Op 20 dec. 2017 12:57 a.m. schreef "Tom Hughes" : On 19/12/17 22:51, Sérgio V. wrote: > but I can't find

[OSM-talk-be] Geospatial devroom at FOSDEM: 4/2/2018

The huge FOSDEM is back In Brussels! There's a geospatial track, and OSM related stuff is welcome there. There's a tight deadline though. Submissions should be sent by December 1st! FOSDEM is a free and non-commercial event bringing together about 8000 developers in Brussels, Belgium. The goal

Re: [OSM-talk] New tool/API to find local OSM mailing lists by location

iling list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joos

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

I've only started using Maproulette recently, but I'm really impressed with what you can do with it. It is the -perfect- user interface for the tasks we currently generate with the Road Completion Project [1]. We're going to consume the generated metadata about Tasks for further steps in the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] how to map a fr:talus?

gt; > André. > > _______ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> |

Re: [OSM-talk] Effecting change in OpenStreetMap

With great power comes great responsibility. When your first minor contributions are met with blunt reactions (however justified), then they are probably going to be your last. Saying things like "we're not complete idiots" or "it would be crazy to do this" is not the way to encourage people to

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM and SIAMU

e would be to work with wikidata identifiers for > every street in and around Brussels. > > Polyglot > > 2017-11-22 21:09 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi Nadia, >> >> Nice to see you here! >> >> I've played with the ide

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM and SIAMU

Hi Nadia, Nice to see you here! I've played with the idea of unique identifiers for OSM objects myself before. But it remains controversial in the international community (not so much in Belgium). Here's an article I wrote long long time ago about it. It's especially useful for the comments,

Re: [OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #382 2017-11-07-2017-11-13

Most of the important stuff has been said already, so I'm just replying because I feel like I have to, since I'm running for the OSMF board [1] on a platform partly about "let's try and keep things fun, shall we?" [2]. Some observations : - while the Weekly did make a bit of a harsh statement,

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

__ >>> talk mailing list >>> talk@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>> >> -- >> >> /Erwin Olario >> >> e: er...@ngnuity.xyz | v/m: https://t.me/GOwin | s: >

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

he *one top thing* for you that would > make it > >>>> better? > >>>> > >>>> I am asking because I am working on a new major release. > >>>> -- > >>>> Martijn van Exel > >>>> > >>>> ___

Re: [OSM-talk] What would make MapRoulette better?

; > I am asking because I am working on a new major release. > > -- > > Martijn van Exel > > > > ___ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > ___

Re: [OSM-talk-be] road completion project

I'm enjoying working on the task myself. Here are a few of the cases that show what this project is all about: http://maproulette.org/map/2789/3111819? http://maproulette.org/map/2789/3119207? http://maproulette.org/map/2789/3111814? http://maproulette.org/map/2789/3117909?

Re: [OSM-talk-be] road completion project

%2C49.1346%2C6.4290%2C51.9170%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%222017-11-04%22%2C%22value%22%3A%222017-11-04%22%7D%5D%7D 2017-11-14 17:06 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com>: > Unfortunately, you have to reload the task every time of you want to keep

Re: [OSM-talk-be] road completion project

Unfortunately, you have to reload the task every time of you want to keep working on a local area. Though the team behind maproulette wants to improve that.for now, you can use your browser developer tools to identify the task number and paste that in an url. But not exactly user friendly. We

[OSM-talk-be] road completion project

a look at the Github, improve the documentation, find another dataset to use, etc! 1: https://github.com/osmbe/road-completion 2: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Road_completion_project/Instructions 3: https://overheid.vlaanderen.be/trefdag-informatie-vlaanderen

[OSM-talk-be] landuse mapping

r/9a8b0290/presentation/2017_10_26_FOSS4G.be_OSMLanduse/index.html#/ 2: http://www.lifewatch.be/en/lifewatch-wb-ecotope-database -- Joost Schouppe ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

Re: [OSM-talk] Hillshading on OSM maps

rid data. I would expect global > coverage 3D scan data to be more reliable than osm and would rather do the > opposite (adjust osm to fit hillshading). > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/lis

[OSM-talk-be] workshop on using qgis with osm data

are available here: https://github.com/osmbe/qgis_rendering/ Thank you to all the people making this happen. We would like to something similar in Brussels, where it should be easier to form a bigger group. If you have a suggestion for a topic, please shoot. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <h

Re: [OSM-talk] Misrepresentation of OSM by HOT?

As a European who is frequently annoyed with both the harshness of some Europeans, as well as the oversensitiveness for criticism from Americans, I agree with both Frederik and Mikel. I do read a clear out-group perspective in how Christoph wrote about this subject. This to me is still strange.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] LiDAR

you could use > processed data to identify potentially missing landuse=forest / tree rows / > trees. > > -- > Joost Schouppe > > > ___ > Talk-be mailing > listTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstre

Re: [OSM-talk-be] LiDAR

/ tree rows / trees. -- Joost Schouppe ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be

[OSM-talk-be] Belgian newsletter

/signup.html We talk about coming events, OSM for government (there's an opinion piece on "collaborative infrastucture for the smart city"), open summer of code (also with a link to a blog), and a call for help to review changesets from people who asked to do so. -- Joos

Re: [OSM-talk-be] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Walking_Routes

gt; [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/ > Walking_Routes#Nordic_Walking > > > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- Joost Schouppe OpenS

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Réunion OSM à Arlon - OSM Meeting in Arlon - 24 October 2017 at 19.30

This is great! Would you mind adding it to the Meetup calender? (or I can do it for you) Op 13 okt. 2017 6:37 p.m. schreef "Pierre Parmentier" < pierrecparment...@gmail.com>: > To the OSM Mappers of the Luxembourg province and around, > > We shall meet on Tuesday 24 October 2017 at 19.30 in

[OSM-talk-be] Foss4g.be: Call for volunteers & registration

Hi, We're looking for volunteers to help out at the foss4g.be event. All info below. If you don't want to volunteer, you should still come, because we have an entire OpenStreetMap track at the event! Check 2017.foss4g.be for the full program. -- Doorgestuurd bericht -- Van:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How we deal with those notes

Hi Jakka, I accidently stumbled upon them too. A lot of them are in fact mapable, though I ignore things like 5-10 places. Some of them make no sense, like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1165979 As for payed/free roadside parking, that is interesting information I think. I've never

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Meetup about rendering of maps

349=gmail=g> A, >> 9000 Gent >> *T* 09 / 331 59 27 >> *W *www.tragewegen.be >> >> [image: logo facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/tragewegen> >> >> ter info: ik werk niet op vrijdag >> Op 5/10/2017 om 10:48 schreef joost schouppe: >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How we deal with this kind of note

he > fact that a place is for rent indicates any access rights to the > driveway ? It can still be access=customers (or visitors, but we > don't have that). > > m. > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:58 AM, joost schouppe > <joost.schou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Jakka mapped it as

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How we deal with this kind of note

Jakka mapped it as private, based on an anonymous note. However, we now have clear indications this is wrong. We can't use Streetview to define this as access=yes, but I believe we can use this to overrule an anonymous source. So I have removed the tag and left a fixme and a comment at the note. I

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Meetup about rendering of maps

Projectmedewerker* >> >> [image: (logo boompja)] <http://www.tragewegen.be> >> >> *A* Kasteellaan 349 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Kasteellaan+349=gmail=g> A, >> 9000 Gent >> *T* 09 / 331 59 27 >> *W *www.tragewegen.be >> >>

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Meetup about rendering of maps

> > Maybe somebody with more expertise in this would like to come and give a > demo? > > Jo > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- Joost

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How we deal with this kind of note

t; ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | Lin

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Do you Tag those as cycleway?

We also discussed this quite extensively on Riot. I think everyone agreed that this is nothing more than "maquillage", but that the proper tag for this maquillage is in fact shared_lane. > Jo: we could use shared_lane, but then we either have to do that on all highways where bicycles aren't

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OSM-talk] DWG survey on organised editing

iling list t...@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> |

[OSM-talk-be] meetup in Brugge

, en om je ervaringen te delen. Jonathan en ik zullen er alvast zijn. Hopelijk komt er nog volk :) Registreer hier: https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/243369086/ -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://tw

Re: [OSM-talk] Beach routing

There are a few highway=virtual and highway:virtual=* objects, which is intended for similar issues. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/virtual_highway I've used it a few times on pedestrian squares where a route relation passes over the square (and it makes no sense to

Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

telegram group, with an offer to translate if needed. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup &

Re: [OSM-talk-be] OSM track at Foss4G be

, OSM apps, JOSM presets and other cool stuff this community has been working on. (there are already a few really cool proposals in, so SAVE THE DATE even if you're not presenting) 2017-07-03 18:16 GMT+02:00 joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > All OpenStreetMap contri

[OSM-talk] OSM and science

that little bit easier for both the OSM and the research community. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <

Re: [OSM-talk] Thanks for cooperation to SOTM 2017

Great work all of you who made this possible! For those who missed it, bulk videos are already available: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0jDNhn6t-PLVvqMPL-ZWbg ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Hectometerbordjes

Het is alleszins een hypothetische discussie. Er komen wel nieuwe bordjes, maar daarom nog niet per sé accurate open geodata over die bordjes. De databank waarin deze borden geïnventariseerd worden, is nog geen open data. Dat zou op relatief korte termijn wel gaan gebeuren. Persoonlijk zie ik meer

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [Osmf-talk] 1 month till State of the Map!

Any Belgians going? -- Doorgestuurd bericht -- Van: "Benoit Fournier" Datum: 17 jul. 2017 22:13 Onderwerp: [Osmf-talk] 1 month till State of the Map! Aan: "OSMF Talk" , "Talk Openstreetmap" < t...@openstreetmap.org> Cc: Dear

Re: [OSM-talk-be] CRAB-adressen met underscore

/wiki/AGIV_CRAB_Import; geeft die > adressen terug als fout zijnde, wat vervelend is wanneer men een straat wil > afwerken. > OSMAND erkent die adressen niet, ook vervelend. > De validator van Bpost neemt ze wel aan, maar vervangt de underscore door > een slash. > > Sus > &

[OSM-talk-be] CRAB-adressen met underscore

conclusie presenteer. U ben steeds welkom op Riot: https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org ) -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/93

[OSM-talk-be] OSM track at Foss4G be

, or with general organisation of the event, send a mail to commun...@osm.be! -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <

Re: [OSM-talk-be] open summer of code: cycling event

nfi...@gmail.com>: > I'm always prepared to give a presentation on how to use JOSM for mapping > route relations. > > Jo > > 2017-06-23 23:03 GMT+02:00 joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> This Open Summer of Code, we'll be supporting

Re: [OSM-talk-be] open summer of code: cycling event

> > > Publieke fietspompen staan niet op de Cyclemap. Gravitystorm weet dat al > lang. > > > ___ > Talk-be mailing list > Talk-be@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be > > -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/use

[OSM-talk-be] open summer of code: cycling event

to commun...@osm.be if you're willing to help out. Registration and more information on the event: https://openbikedatamapping.eventbrite.com -- Joost Schouppe, Ben Abelshausen & Jonathan Belien OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https:

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Talk-be Digest, Vol 114, Issue 22

Dus geen fout in de data van Wegen en Verkeer dan? Op 21 juni 2017 om 14:51 schreef Marc Gemis : > Inderdaad, en 70 een paar honderd meter voor de verkeerslichten. [1] > Dus was het de GPS die 70 aangaf. > > Bedankt, Philippe ! > > > [1]

Re: [OSM-talk-be] strange styling of waterway=drain + intermittent=yes

7, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Steven Clays <steven.cl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> How do you perform a hard refresh? >>> >>> >>> 2017-06-07 15:37 GMT+02:00 Ben Abelshausen <ben.abelshau...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> Works here, maybe

Re: [OSM-talk-be] strange styling of waterway=drain + intermittent=yes

tTalk-be@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >> >> >> >> ___ >> Talk-be mailing list >> Talk-be@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be >&

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Tagging of schools/college

> > Therefore, in my opinion, using the tag "amenity=college" for secondary > > schools (as in "secundair onderwijs", "école secondaire") is a bad idea, > > even though in dutch it can be called a "college". > > That is what I was planning to do after consulting this mailing list > and having

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 90->70 in Vlaanderen

Nou, het ziet ernaar uit dat ik de fout heb gevonden. In de shapefile zitten nieuwe en oude snelheden. Soms is de nieuwe snelheid ongewijzigd 90 gebleven. Dit kaartje toont al die segmenten: http://i.imgur.com/vbx6q6f.jpg De WMS die aan de mapper is gegeven bevat alle segmenten die in de

Re: [OSM-talk-be] suburb

al objecten) om manueel te gaan aanpassen. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/Op

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Authorization request for use of SPW data (PICC, orthophotos and others) and OSM representative

ght now, but we're working on getting a good solution for the WMS (rendered raster data) services. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-sc

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Authorization request for use of SPW data (PICC, orthophotos and others) and OSM representative

n any issues myself. 1: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Imagery_Offset_Database 2: http://osmlab.github.io/editor-imagery-index/ -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <h

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Tagging of schools/college

> > Jo nous a expliqué qu'on écrit en flamand quand le problème est flamand > mais c'est souvent loin d'être le cas. > Pourquoi ne pas fournir une traduction plutôt que de demander à 100 > personnes d'en faire une? > Pour moi, le plus important est que chaque personne peut s'exprimer librement.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] YES, we can trace the PICC

their legal department before agreeing to something that they perhaps shouldn't. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Me

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Authorization request for use of SPW data (PICC, orthophotos and others) and OSM representative

r anything under the ODbL license. -- Joost Schouppe OpenStreetMap <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/joost%20schouppe/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/joostjakob> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/pub/joost-schouppe/48/939/603> | Meetup <http://www.meetup.com/OpenStr

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >