Re: [Talk-it] Import Dati regione Puglia

Il 02/11/2017 16:29, tommasodinoia ha scritto: Ciao a tutti, sto lavorando insieme a Luca ai dati di cui vi ha parlato. I dati da importare derivano da un progetto comune tra Politecnico di Bari e Regione Puglia e provengono dai due portali: http://www.pugliadigitallibrary.it

Re: [Talk-it] Import Dati regione Puglia

tommy guarda la licenza iniziale in base a questa matrice. M sembra che i dati pugliesi siano in cc-by-sa e in iodl2.0 ci andrei cauto http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility Piersoft Inviato da iPhone > Il giorno 02 nov 2017, alle ore 16:29, tommasodinoia >

Re: [Talk-it] Import Dati regione Puglia

Ciao a tutti, sto lavorando insieme a Luca ai dati di cui vi ha parlato. I dati da importare derivano da un progetto comune tra Politecnico di Bari e Regione Puglia e provengono dai due portali: http://www.pugliadigitallibrary.it https://www.viaggiareinpuglia.it (questi ultimi nella loro versione

Re: [OSM-talk] Label language on the Default stylesheet

On 11/02/17 08:20, Tomas Straupis wrote: What was the reason NOT to use vector tiles? As that would solve most of the problems discussed in this thread. They didn't exist in a usable form at the time (I think), and most deployments are WebGL-based ("not a newish browser on a newish computer?

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

W dniu 02.11.2017 o 07:14, Warin pisze: On 02-Nov-17 02:31 PM, Stephane Goldstein wrote: Do you have any other words that smean tree planting, growing and then harvesting?? And don't mean anything else? The closest I have is 'forestry'. landuse=forestry is a good option as well.

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 02-Nov-17 02:31 PM, Stephane Goldstein wrote: If OSM were to have landuse=plantation there would need to be a further tag plantation=cotton/tobacco/coffee/sugar_cane/trees/banana///house/bushes/* Do you have any other words that smean tree planting, growing and then

Re: [Talk-it] Nasoni a Roma, sottotipi fontanelle in generale

dieterdreist wrote > per me, ne "name" (che non è un nome individuale) ne artwork_type (che non > le vedo "arte") sarebbe pertinenti, ma fossi in te non rimuoverei niente > in > massa, casomai, inizia una discussione locale e provvedete insieme. > D'altro > canto parliamo di 16 istanze di

[OSM-talk] Please share the Philosophy of Openness in Geospatial Science  and Education on GIS Day and other Geo events

Dear colleagues, It is over a decade now since we started working on the philosophy of Openness in Geospatial Science and Education. The pace of change in the GIS in the last decade towards Openness has been beyond even my expectations. May i request all who are taking part in various Geo

Re: [Talk-it] Import Dati regione Puglia

2017-11-02 18:15 GMT+01:00 Francesco Piero Paolicelli : > tommy guarda la licenza iniziale in base a questa matrice. > M sembra che i dati pugliesi siano in cc-by-sa e in iodl2.0 > > ci andrei cauto > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility > > > > nel

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

> IMHO there are semantic implications in the key, as has been said many > times, <...> And that is subjective -> nobody is wrong -> everybody is right -> everybody thinks THEIR proposal is the right one -> this topic is not settled for so many years -> I suggest doing a compromise and agreeing

Re: [Talk-it] Nasoni a Roma, sottotipi fontanelle in generale

Ciao, 2017-11-02 7:40 GMT+01:00 Aury88 : > @ML it: visto comunque che stiamo parlando di un elemento estremamente > importante della mappa, usato in un po' tutto il mondo con più di 200'000 > elementi mappati con l'uno o l'altro tag e sui quali sospetto si siano > ormai

Re: [Talk-it] Import Civici Valle d'Aosta

2017-11-01 18:18 GMT+01:00 Andrea Musuruane : > 2017-11-01 18:03 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt : > >> Hai chiesto all'utente CUSPC ? >> > > Non ancora. Speravo che qualche valdostano in lista ne sapesse di più. > Ho scritto all'utente ieri sera. Attendo

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

2017-11-02 10:24 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis : > > I like the landcover=trees idea, but this does not describe the > complete picture. I also want t be able to indicate what is between > the trees: ground, grass, grassy plants, bushes. > And when is something landcover=trees +

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

2017-11-02 11:24 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis wrote: > The current situation is not helping in producing useful maps. Too > often I find myself in a residential area with large gardens and trees > when I expected to find a real forest based on what OSM is displaying. This is exactly why I started the

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

2017-11-02 11:49 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine wrote: >> P.S. And all I wanted was to talk about topology rules... BTW: here is >> an example of topology rules in Lithuania: >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Lithuania/Topology_rules > > <...> In your rules #2 and #5 seem to be at odds?

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 02-Nov-17 05:42 PM, Daniel Koć wrote: W dniu 02.11.2017 o 07:14, Warin pisze: On 02-Nov-17 02:31 PM, Stephane Goldstein wrote: Do you have any other words that smean tree planting, growing and then harvesting?? And don't mean anything else? The closest I have is 'forestry'.

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

Currently according to taginfo the most popular are: natural=wood 4,5M landuse=forest 3,5M others are way behind. for example landcover=trees - 11000 objects... So maybe there is a point to choose one of the two popular tags and be done with it? If anybody wants more detail - subtags could be

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 02/11/17 09:13, Tomas Straupis wrote: >> IMHO there are semantic implications in the key, as has been said many >> times, <...> > > And that is subjective -> nobody is wrong -> everybody is right -> > everybody thinks THEIR proposal is the right one -> this topic is not > settled for so many

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

sent from a phone > On 2. Nov 2017, at 11:24, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How is a small area of trees different from a larger one? it offers habitat for animals, creates its own microclimate and develops different soil. A forest is different from a group of trees. Just go into

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

Hello, Someone hinted it earlier, but may I repeat? Is @tagging (list) not working correctly? JB. Le 02/11/2017 à 13:34, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : sent from a phone On 2. Nov 2017, at 11:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: With landuse=residential there are no sub tags to indicate

Re: [OSM-talk] Label language on the Default stylesheet

On 01.11.17 19:15, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: On 2017-11-01 at 14:28:12 +0100, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote: There is a code for the Lingua Latina (Latin language) in the ISO 639-1, which is used at the OSM. It is "la" [1]. It is an ancient language so modern political controversies would not be

Re: [OSM-talk] Label language on the Default stylesheet

What was the reason NOT to use vector tiles? As that would solve most of the problems discussed in this thread. -- Tomas ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

2017-11-02 8:14 GMT+01:00 Tomas Straupis : > Currently according to taginfo the most popular are: > natural=wood 4,5M > landuse=forest 3,5M > others are way behind. for example landcover=trees - 11000 objects... > > So maybe there is a point to choose one of the two

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

The current situation is not helping in producing useful maps. Too often I find myself in a residential area with large gardens and trees when I expected to find a real forest based on what OSM is displaying. So there is room for improvement. I like the landcover=trees idea, but this does not

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

2017-11-02 10:13 GMT+01:00 Tomas Straupis : > this topic is not > settled for so many years -> I suggest doing a compromise and agreeing > on ONE tag. ONE tag to say what? You are still owing an answer to this. Cheers, Martin

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

sent from a phone > On 2. Nov 2017, at 11:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What next - the difference between a large group of houses and a smaller > group? we already do this. We don’t tag a village as tiny town or a city as huge village. Different size can lead to different

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

sent from a phone > On 2. Nov 2017, at 11:34, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > With landuse=residential there are no sub tags to indicate the kind of houses > there or apartment blocks, colours, height etc. we might do this though. If we were all urbanists and architects we most

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 02/11/17 09:40, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > ONE tag to say what? You are still owing an answer to this. I think the problem is similar to the multiple areas problem. There are several layers of complexity so should landuse=residential enclose the whole area including the grass and wooded

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 02-Nov-17 08:58 PM, Tomas Straupis wrote: 2017-11-02 11:24 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis wrote: The current situation is not helping in producing useful maps. Too often I find myself in a residential area with large gardens and trees when I expected to find a real forest based on what OSM is

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 02/11/17 10:17, Warin wrote: > A botanic Garden contains lots of different plants, including grass for > the ones I have been to. > Mapping each individual plant with its species and genus ... no thanks. > I did map one tree though, just to be inconsistent. :) But there is nothing stopping the

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 02/11/17 10:34, Warin wrote: > On 02-Nov-17 09:21 PM, Lester Caine wrote: >> On 02/11/17 09:40, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> ONE tag to say what? You are still owing an answer to this. >> I think the problem is similar to the multiple areas problem. There are >> several layers of complexity

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 02-Nov-17 08:49 PM, Lester Caine wrote: On 02/11/17 09:13, Tomas Straupis wrote: IMHO there are semantic implications in the key, as has been said many times, <...> And that is subjective -> nobody is wrong -> everybody is right -> everybody thinks THEIR proposal is the right one -> this

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On 02-Nov-17 09:21 PM, Lester Caine wrote: On 02/11/17 09:40, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: ONE tag to say what? You are still owing an answer to this. I think the problem is similar to the multiple areas problem. There are several layers of complexity so should landuse=residential enclose the

Re: [OSM-talk] Woods vs Forests

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 02-Nov-17 08:58 PM, Tomas Straupis wrote: >> >> 2017-11-02 11:24 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis wrote: >>> >>> The current situation is not helping in producing useful maps. Too >>> often I find myself in a residential area with

Re: [Talk-it] Tag wikipedia su via

2017-10-11 16:54 GMT+02:00 Daniele Santini : > Nella mia città un utente ha aggiunto nel tag Wikipedia di una strada la > pagina wikipedia dedicata al personaggio a cui è intitolata la via. Ma > questo utilizzo non è sbagliato? Anche dalle mie parti succede la stessa cosa,

Re: [Talk-it] Tag wikipedia su via

2017-11-02 15:40 GMT+01:00 Federico Cortese : > 2017-10-11 16:54 GMT+02:00 Daniele Santini : > > Nella mia città un utente ha aggiunto nel tag Wikipedia di una strada la > > pagina wikipedia dedicata al personaggio a cui è intitolata la via. Ma > >

Re: [Talk-it] Tag wikipedia su via

2017-11-02 15:40 GMT+01:00 Federico Cortese : > 2017-10-11 16:54 GMT+02:00 Daniele Santini : > > Nella mia città un utente ha aggiunto nel tag Wikipedia di una strada la > > pagina wikipedia dedicata al personaggio a cui è intitolata la via. Ma > >

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

Co mne napadá je okamžité včlenění RUIAN dat do mapy. Jakmile je někde zRUIANizována vesnice, do týdne jsou domy v mapě. Ale o nějakou revoluci se nejedná, spíše poklidná evoluce. Šlo by nějak vypíchnout integraci různých dat (klidně i starších importů - chráněná území, lesy, vodstvo,

[OSM-talk-ie] Outcomes of 21 October 2017 meetup

Hi everyone! I believe someone documented the action items and owners from the meetup on 21 October 2017. Can you share them here (or in the Google drive folder) so we can check them off as they are completed? Also, where do we want to keep the discussion regarding the possible establishment of

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map

On 11/02/17 14:21, Dave F wrote: On 02/11/2017 13:25, Andy Townsend wrote: On 11/02/17 13:02, Dave F wrote: It's great pedestrian crossings are rendered, but the icon gets swallowed by the road way. I'd probably need to see an example of that - any chance of a permalink?  It's

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

No právě :-D já to beru prostě jako komunitu, občanskou iniciativu ze zdola, v podstatě tenhle mailing list, bez formálního tělesa. Ale i tahle améba, kterou tvoříte vy, lidi, si zaslouží kredit a o ten mi jde j On Thu, 2 Nov 2017, 19:04 Marián Kyral, wrote: > BTW: co se

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

Tak v tom případě bych určitě zmínil projekt mapování turistických tras a sbírání fotek rozcestníků. Tom Kašpárek možná dodá i statistiku, kolik se povedlo zmapovat. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Jachym Cepicky Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Projet sur les données vélo en Île-de-France

CartoCité vous êtes les mecs les plus cools de la classe OSM ! Et je dis ça sans ironie aucune ... vous êtes au top les gars. Continuez comme ça. Le 31 octobre 2017 à 17:19, Antoine Riche a écrit : > Le 31/10/2017 à 16:42, marc marc a écrit : > > - génial pour le

[OSM-talk-fr] Cherche photos pour illustrer osm.fr

Hello, Nous avions parlé en début d'année d'une refonte du site internet openstreetmap.fr Je m'y repenche en ce moment, et je cherche des photos pour illustrer les pages. Si vous en avez de très belles je suis preneur ! Ce qui m'intéresse : -des photos de groupe / événements -des photos de

Re: [talk-latam] talk-latam Digest, Vol 38, Issue 1

Hola Javier, Realmente ando muy limitada de tiempo para reunirnos, pero igual y podemos avanzar por aquí. Cuando mencionas “aunque trabajando básicamente en los mismo” ¿a qué te refieres en específico? Antes de pensar en sumar sinergias sería bueno que nos compartieras datos y estadísticas de

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

napsal jsem co máme s tím, že statistiky/mapy dodáme. bď to bude stačit nebo to stačit nebude tak jako tak - díky všem P.S. užijte si openalt. z rodinných důvodů bez šance pá 3. 11. 2017 v 0:17 odesílatel Jan Macura napsal: > 2017-11-03 0:14 GMT+01:00 Marián Kyral

[OSM-talk-fr] live.openstreetmap.fr down

Hello, http://live.openstreetmap.fr/ est down, est-ce lié aux problèmes d'infra précédemment abordés par Chrisitian ou est-ce que je vous nourri gentiment d'un nouveau problème ? ;) -- *Florian Lainez* @overflorian ___

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

Počká to do příštího týdne? O víkendu je OpenAlt a SOTM CZ. Případně přijď na přednášky: https://openalt.cz/2017/program_detail.php# event_241 Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Jachym Cepicky Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

2017-11-03 0:14 GMT+01:00 Marián Kyral : > Default si tam dej co chceš. A když se podíváš blíže, tak změny tam vidět > jsou. Docela dost výrazné. Třeba ještě není otevřená Blanka. > Ok, ale to je od stavu BEFORE nejspíš změna i faktická. Pro presentaci "odvedené práce" se víc

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

statistiku prosím ;-) čt 2. 11. 2017 v 19:55 odesílatel Marián Kyral napsal: > Tak v tom případě bych určitě zmínil projekt mapování turistických tras a > sbírání fotek rozcestníků. Tom Kašpárek možná dodá i statistiku, kolik se > povedlo zmapovat. > > Marián > > --

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

Co třeba tohle? http://pierzen.dev.openstreetmap.org/hot/leaflet/OSM-Compare -before-after.html#14/50.1274/14.5050 Jen nevím, jak přesně je staré "Before" Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Jachym Cepicky Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

2017-11-03 0:04 GMT+01:00 Marián Kyral : > Co třeba tohle? http://pierzen.dev.openstreetmap.org/hot/leaflet/ > OSM-Compare-before-after.html#14/50.1274/14.5050 > Jen nevím, jak přesně je staré "Before" > Ten Prágl je tam asi default, co? Zrovna tam ty změny moc poznat nebudou.

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

2 mapy by bodly - já to umím udělat, ale neumím vytáhnout ty data čt 2. 11. 2017 v 23:52 odesílatel Jachym Cepicky napsal: > statistiku prosím ;-) > > čt 2. 11. 2017 v 19:55 odesílatel Marián Kyral napsal: > >> Tak v tom případě bych určitě zmínil

Re: [talk-latam] talk-latam Digest, Vol 38, Issue 1

Hola Miriam! Lamento que no tengas tiempo.Tiempos duros para todos... Respecto de tu consulta, estamos trabajando en la OSM geo week, aunque desde Aguascalientes (mira el mapa, esta arriba del de México). Haremos allí una plática junto a UNFPA sobre como mapear y usaremos de ejemplos varias

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

-- Původní e-mail -- Od: Jan Macura Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 3. 11. 2017 0:12:18 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci " 2017-11-03 0:04 GMT+01:00 Marián Kyral

Re: [talk-au] BYO drinks at restaurant

Ben wrote "I think that's some kind of location code. I forget what it's called. If you search for that string in Google Maps it takes you to an address at the Gold Coast." Bing maps (and Bing search) does not know of this string. Maybe it's proprietary Google information. Nick

Re: [Talk-cz] Fwd: DŮLEŽITÉ_Doplnění infa k aplikaci

2017-11-03 0:30 GMT+01:00 Jachym Cepicky : > napsal jsem co máme s tím, že statistiky/mapy dodáme. bď to bude stačit > nebo to stačit nebude tak jako tak - díky všem > btw, jestli se to třeba bude hodit, tak jsem sem

Re: [talk-au] BYO drinks at restaurant

After a bit of digging around I concluded that OsmAnd displays these "plus codes" as a convenience for the user -- they are not stored in OSM itself. The coordinates in a format called Open Location Code (OLC) < http://openlocationcode.com/> that is something like a voice-friendly description of

Re: [talk-au] BYO drinks at restaurant

On 3 November 2017 at 09:58, Nick Hocking wrote: > > Bing maps (and Bing search) does not know of this string. Maybe it's > proprietary Google information. > I was wondering the same thing, because a Google search on that string of data returns a location shown on

Re: [Talk-cz] multipolygony a cesty v lese

Dne 2.11.2017 v 12:37 Milan Cerny napsal(a): > Otázka je, co je správně když silnice, cesta nebo trať vede lesem, mají být > lesní plochy na každé straně cesty, nebo stačí, když cesta povede přes > souvislou lesní plochu. IMHO je spravne ten velky les (multipolygon). Nejedna se od nekolik lesu

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map - signed walking routes

On 11/02/17 03:31, Andrew Black wrote:  My request. Signed walking routes such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6084014 There's logic in the style that has been forked to handle those: https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=17=51.424012=-0.06819 There's obviously a

Re: [Talk-cz] multipolygony a cesty v lese

Beru, že ty multipolygony mají svoje nevýhody, ale používají se běžně. Netuším, proč zrovna u lesů by měly být špatně, resp. obdobně by pak měly být špatně třeba i pole apod. Tím by ovšem třeba import z lpis ztrácel absolutně význam. Ne že bych ho používala běžně, ale občas se hodí použít to k

[OSM-talk-ie] Fwd: [HOT] OSM & gender inclusivity - survey

FYI English survey is at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf2-MoTnCgqc3Jnu1zValuh6enKzR_049k1aAQtR2sl9qEJsw/viewform I already filled it out with my perspective of the Irish community. Would be great if a few others could add their observations. Interested to hear how some of the efforts

Re: [Talk-cz] multipolygony a cesty v lese

-- Původní e-mail -- Od: majka Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 2. 11. 2017 13:04:35 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] multipolygony a cesty v lese " Beru, že ty multipolygony mají svoje nevýhody, ale používají se běžně.

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] November meeting Thursday

I note at the transformed Gunmakers Arms that apart from the 10 real ale hand pulls “Every Thursday from 6pm to 8pm. Curry and rice or chips plus a pint of Two Towers Brewery ale for just £8.99.” https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93693430 Cheers Andy From: Rob Nickerson

[Talk-cz] multipolygony a cesty v lese

Ahoj všem, byl jsem německy kontaktován uživatelem fell3 s dotazem, proč používám na lesní plochy multipolygony místo menších ploch. Podle něj, by měly být lesní plochy rozděleny na malé kousky podle cest. Otázka je, co je správně když silnice, cesta nebo trať vede lesem, mají být lesní plochy

[OSM-talk-fr] http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/

Bonjour, Lorsque j'essaie d’accéder à http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/ Je reçois un message d'erreur Ubuntu Apache2 voir fichier https://framadrop.org/r/ZHSehpKmel#HbQ9gcPy2DfzdrmZ0Ft1GhbT5+3QO3DvZdncK2g/pWY= Je suis soux W10 avec Firefox 56 Où signaler le pb ? Cordialement Leni

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/

Christian (cquest) est déjà dessus ;) Le 2 novembre 2017 à 11:46, lenny.libre a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Lorsque j'essaie d’accéder à http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/ > > Je reçois un message d'erreur Ubuntu Apache2 voir fichier >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/

Ok, merci Le 02/11/2017 à 11:50, Éric Gillet a écrit : Christian (cquest) est déjà dessus ;) Le 2 novembre 2017 à 11:46, lenny.libre > a écrit : Bonjour, Lorsque j'essaie d’accéder à http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/ Je reçois

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map

>2. Permissive paths: I do not understand “permissive paths need showing; >Andy's >cartography does not yet do this but again this is something I have >experience with.” >Woodhouse Farm in Ipsden, South Oxfordshire has provided a >permissive footpath >and permissive bridleways. Both are shown

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map

On 31/10/17 19:04, Bob Hawkins wrote: 2. Permissive paths: I do not understand “/permissive paths need showing/ I hope this means distinguishing from public ones, rather than that they are currently not rendered! Almost every path in a council or Royal park is a permissive path, even if

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map

On 11/02/17 10:32, David Woolley wrote: On 31/10/17 19:04, Bob Hawkins wrote: 2. Permissive paths: I do not understand “/permissive paths need showing/ I hope this means distinguishing from public ones, rather than that they are currently not rendered! They'll currently appear like the

Re: [Talk-de] Entwicklungsumgebung für Kartenstil

dktue wrote: > Hat jemand einen Tipp, wie man eine gute Entwicklungsumgebung schafft, > sodass man möglichst schnell iterieren und ausprobieren kann, während > man entwickelt? Früher gab es ja Tile-Mill, aber wie entwickelt man heute? kosmtik Allerdings so wie bei allen

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map: abandoned railways may still have bridges.

Assuming you are talking about this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201674137 Nothing to do with disused=yes - it's not rendered because it's marked as railway=abandoned, which is the correct way to tag a former railway line where the tracks have been lifted but the route is still

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map

On 02/11/2017 13:25, Andy Townsend wrote: On 11/02/17 13:02, Dave F wrote: It's great pedestrian crossings are rendered, but the icon gets swallowed by the road way. I'd probably need to see an example of that - any chance of a permalink? It's supposed to render on top (albeit small),

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map railway bridges

On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:02:13PM +, Dave F wrote: > > of dismantled railways, and also possibly abandoned ones, > > I agree with removing all of the above, except where they're co-tagged with > objects which still exist ie disused bridges: >

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map

On 11/02/17 13:02, Dave F wrote: It's great pedestrian crossings are rendered, but the icon gets swallowed by the road way. I'd probably need to see an example of that - any chance of a permalink?  It's supposed to render on top (albeit small), but it may be I've missed something and

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map: abandoned railways may still have bridges.

On 2 November 2017 13:23:53 GMT+00:00, ael wrote: >On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:02:13PM +, Dave F wrote: >> > >> > o Another is railways - I'm guessing you'd want to remove the >rendering >> > of dismantled railways, and also possibly abandoned ones, > >But please

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map

On 30/10/2017 17:34, Andy Townsend wrote: On 30/10/2017 08:58, Nick Whitelegg wrote: As you may know, the plan is to produce a UK specific OSM mapping site. A start on this has been made here: http://www.free-map.org.uk/osmuk/ using a fork of SomeoneElse (Andy)'s cartography with one

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map: abandoned railways may still have bridges.

On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 01:02:13PM +, Dave F wrote: > > > > o Another is railways - I'm guessing you'd want to remove the rendering > > of dismantled railways, and also possibly abandoned ones, But please render existing bridges: these are quite common in Cornwall and are highly significant

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map: abandoned railways may still have bridges.

Thirded. Examples abound but an egregious one, in this context, is the south side of Leeds City Centre where you have the Holbeck Viaduct with its 92 brick arches 3 stories high marching across the urban landscape. An extremely visible structure in reality but rendered invisible on all the main

Re: [Talk-cz] multipolygony a cesty v lese

Na jednotlivé stromy se podívej do mapy pohraničí s Rakouskem, třeba České Velenice jsou pěkný příklad ;) Ve stromořadích je zmapovaný každý strom. Jen netuším, jestli to teď také někdo aktualizoval (popadalo toho tady docela dost). Mimochodem, Němci to dělají taky... 2017-11-02 14:40

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map: abandoned railways may still have bridges.

On 11/02/17 13:43, Paul Berry wrote: Thirded. Examples abound but an egregious one, in this context, is the south side of Leeds City Centre where you have the Holbeck Viaduct with its 92 brick arches 3 stories high marching across the urban landscape. An extremely visible structure in

Re: [Talk-GB] The OSM UK map: abandoned railways may still have bridges.

Michael, Yes, I stand corrected: the tracks have been lifted here but everything else is very visible. The old (< 2015) rendering of the Standard Layer (which was until recently available on http://tile.openstreetmap.fr and perhaps still is elsewhere) did show this feature. Andy, I'm loath to