Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

If we can determine importance (which is what the 'highway=' tag fundamentally represents per the wiki) solely by what's on the ground, why not just tag what's physically there, ditch the 'highway' tag altogether, and let the renders handle it with their own algorithms? >On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at

Re: [OSM-talk-be] mapping ALPR cameras (in Ghent)

Wit respect to the "to-node", IMHO any node on the way that shows the driving direction that is controlled is fine. So if the way to which you want the add the enforcement relation is drawn from left to right., any node right of the from node is fine. For a way drawn right to left, any node to the

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > The US is pretty well known for overbuilding highways. Are we trying to > document how things are on the ground or how things are actually > connected? If we're going for the former, then yeah, only Bend Parkway and

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

You clearly haven't driven on US 97. It's a fairly busy road with a good amount of truck traffic and lots of little towns along it. That was my experience when I drove it. It goes thru central Oregon, which is arid, but not totally desolate. There was PLENTY of cars going in the other direction.

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Ian Dees wrote: > Hi everyone, > > It sounds like this thread isn't really going anywhere. Since email > threads like this tend to be a terrible way to have intense conversation, I > would encourage you all to talk in real time on IRC, Slack,

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Nathan Mills wrote: > I guess my question is why primary isn't good enough for the primary route > between places that don't have higher grade roads connecting them? These > important mostly two lane roads are perfectly fine as primary. >

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

Hi everyone, It sounds like this thread isn't really going anywhere. Since email threads like this tend to be a terrible way to have intense conversation, I would encourage you all to talk in real time on IRC, Slack, or a video chat of some sort. Maybe Martijn could set up a Hangout? -Ian On

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

I think primary ought to be used for major state routes and minor US routes, secondary for minor state routes, and tertiary for collector arterials. On Oct 14, 2017 9:23 PM, "Nathan Mills" wrote: > I guess my question is why primary isn't good enough for the primary route >

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

I guess my question is why primary isn't good enough for the primary route between places that don't have higher grade roads connecting them? These important mostly two lane roads are perfectly fine as primary. In many cases primary routes happen to be divided, but in many cases they aren't.

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote: > That can be easily rectified by tagging trunk roads in accordance with the > wiki. > Exactly backwards, since the wiki is supposed to document how things are already consumed, not the other way around. Which wasn't

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

That can be easily rectified by tagging trunk roads in accordance with the wiki. They should be the most important non-motorway roads. Tagging most US highways as such fulfills this. On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 8:03 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:43 PM,

Re: [OSM-ja] 半鐘について

man_made=campanileという選択肢もありますが、 man_made=tower + tower:type=bell_towerでよいと思いますよ。 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:man_made%3Dcampanile (機能を考えたらtower:type=sirenのほうが近いかもしれませんが、物理的にはtower:type=bell_towerですし) muramoto ___ Talk-ja mailing list

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

I'm amazed that NE2's definition hasn't been removed after 7 years. It must not have been that controversial or else someone would have removed it. Seems like you just don't agree with his opinion and just really have some personal problems with that guy. I know he engaged in some really dumb

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2017 5:41 PM, "Paul Johnson" wrote: > > Or, map it cleanly to limited access expressways and super2s. I really > think people are trying to overthink this a bit; being a little

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2017 5:41 PM, "Paul Johnson" wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Evin Fairchild > wrote: > >> >> >> On Oct 14, 2017 4:25 PM, "Paul Johnson"

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Oct 14, 2017 5:41 PM, "Paul Johnson" wrote: On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2017 4:25 PM, "Paul Johnson" wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Evin Fairchild

[Talk-it] Nomi di fiumi e torrenti, e (ab)uso di waterway=river

Anche se è da poco che mappo io sarei dell'opinione che Fiume e Torrente dovrebbero fare parte del nome. Ciò non tanto per il rendering quanto perché il nome di tutte le way è scritto con nome comune seguito dal nome proprio, cioè come una strada cittadina viene indicata Via, Corso, Viale ecc.

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote: > > > On Oct 14, 2017 4:25 PM, "Paul Johnson" wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Evin Fairchild > wrote: > >> On Oct 14, 2017 2:04 PM, "Wolfgang Zenker"

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Oct 14, 2017 4:25 PM, "Paul Johnson" wrote: On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote: > On Oct 14, 2017 2:04 PM, "Wolfgang Zenker" > wrote: > > Hi, > > it looks to me that this discussion is going in

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > There's still a fundamental difference between a controlled or limited > access route that isn't a freeway, and a two lane road without hard > shoulders that has a 70 mph speed limit. > To expand on this, it's pretty

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Evin Fairchild wrote: > On Oct 14, 2017 2:04 PM, "Wolfgang Zenker" > wrote: > > Hi, > > it looks to me that this discussion is going in circles, not forward > at the moment. IMHO it does not make a lot of sense to

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Oct 14, 2017 2:04 PM, "Wolfgang Zenker" wrote: Hi, it looks to me that this discussion is going in circles, not forward at the moment. IMHO it does not make a lot of sense to argue what might be the true meaning of "trunk". Instead, we should concentrate on what it

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo tratto relazione Alpinistica

In effetti nella proposta relativa al cai_scale e nella wiki abbiamo scritto che il cai_scale e' per la relazione. Non e' che abbiamo "proibito" di metterlo sulla way ma non avrebbe molto senso farlo. il sac_scale gia' universalmente adottato assolve a questo compito di distinguere le singole way,

Re: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

sent from a phone > On 14. Oct 2017, at 10:37, demon.box wrote: > > che va sicuramente bene per la falegnameria ma invece un segheria non è > esattamente la stessa cosa... > > che dite? craft=sawmill è usato 2500 volte. Io avrei più cercato in man_made=sawmill oppure

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

Hi, it looks to me that this discussion is going in circles, not forward at the moment. IMHO it does not make a lot of sense to argue what might be the true meaning of "trunk". Instead, we should concentrate on what it should mean, document this meaning if we can agree on one and don't worry to

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo tratto relazione Alpinistica

Interessante questa distinzione tra il sac_scale sulla way, accettata in modo universale e il cai_scale sulla relazione. Mi piacerebbe sentire cosa dice Alfredo e il sosec Però devo aggiungere che da neofito per i sentieri a catasto regionale di cui sto creando le relazioni, effettivamente ho già

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

The linked example is an OSM screenshot? So yes, especially if it is strictly adhering to trunk==expressway, then they will be explicitly marked. This is circular. USGS maps emphasize roads when they are multi-lane highways that aren't freeways, not when they are expressways. Not every multi-lane

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Bradley White wrote: > On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Nathan Mills wrote: > > Road maps in the US have long differentiated between freeway/expressway > and > > has had both of those clearly different than US and

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

As I said previously, and I think it bears repeating, it's very easy to tell if a trunk is divided or undivided when you look at US or Canada at zoom 5 on the standard layer. Divided trunks show up as a thicker line than undivided trunks. Also worth noting that Google maps doesn't display divided

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

2017-10-14 15:57 GMT+03:00 Jochen Topf wrote: > Do I understand this correctly? You are creating tags in the OSM > database for your private tool? I hope there is some misunderstanding > here, because that isn't acceptable behaviour. The problem is much much larger. This whole wikidata

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Nathan Mills wrote: > Road maps in the US have long differentiated between freeway/expressway and > has had both of those clearly different than US and state highways we'd be > tagging as primary. Map users expect to see expressways shown

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Certificat Osmose expiré

Bonjour, Le 14/10/2017 à 10:40, Francois Gouget a écrit : > > Le certificat de https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ a expiré aujourd'hui > à 00:15 : > > osmose.openstreetmap.fr uses an invalid security certificate. C'est corrigé, merci d'avoir prévenu. -- Jocelyn

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

I think I've said this before, but I'm mostly in agreement with Paul's position. Trunk should apply to divided, limited but not controlled access highways. Other uses should be exceptions in the same vein as rural interstates with a few at-grade intersections keeping their motorway status.

Re: [Talk-se] Ändringsset: 52111741

Nu fixat, det gick lätt med https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter /Essin Den 11 oktober 2017 13:38 skrev Essin : > Hej! > > Har detta åtgärdats än? Annars kan jag göra ett försök. JOSM-validatorn > (över)reagerar ofta på byggnader som verkar vara

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

Still don't agree about osmand making trunks look like a divided highway/ expressway but whatever. Either way, if we tag only divided highways as trunk just because a certain renderer makes trunk roads look like divided highways (BTW, this is a better term to use here than expressway because it

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

I use Osmand frequently; the point of the cased-line style of the trunk & motorway tags is, agreeing with Paul here, to show some degree of access control. This is in-line with many paper road atlases, especially older ones. My point was that third-party applications choosing to use this style is

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

To add onto what Bradley was saying about third-party applications, I just want to add that I've done some fact-checking about a claim that Paul made in a previous email about how Osmand renders trunks under the assumption that they are expressways (to be clear, by this I mean divided highways w/

Re: [Talk-us] Trunk

> The concept of expressway and freeway are reasonably well known concepts; > it makes a lot of sense to map trunk and motorway to those concepts. I agree with freeways but not with expressways. I have no data to back this claim up, but I'm fairly convinced that, while the average citizen could

Re: [OSM-talk-be] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Walking_Routes

Hi Stijn, That is a huge page! I would suggest splitting it in three: - long distance routes - walking node networks - local routes 2017-10-03 20:20 GMT+02:00 Stijn Rombauts : > Hello, > > Could it be that this page [1] has become too big, with too many links to >

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

Am 14.10.2017 um 11:33 schrieb Yuri Astrakhan: > ** UPDATE: ** > > The service now supports "reject" button.  To use it, your query must > contain "  #queryId:...  "  comment.  By default, when a user rejects > something, a tag "_autoreject=id" is created. An object can have > multiple rejected

Re: [OSM-co] Abreviaturas - Consenso

De acuerdo Cordial Saludo, Jaime Mejía El 11 de octubre de 2017, 12:18, Jorge Aguirre escribió: > Para terminar con este tema, quisiera pedir a la Comunidad de Talk-Co > emitan su última palabra al respecto y podamos todos proceder de acuerdo a > el consenso común: > > >

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Publication OpenData du cadastre

Je me suis lancé dans l'extraction et la compilation thématique des couches de données. Dans le but d'avoir des données découpées par thématiques et non par feuilles cadastrales. Je n'ai volontairement pris que l'habillage (pas de parcelle, bâtiment et numéro de rue). Le résultat est

hebdoOSM Nº 377 2017-10-03-2017-10-09

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 377 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/9535/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

hebdoOSM Nº 377 2017-10-03-2017-10-09

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 377 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/9535/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

hebdoOSM Nº 377 2017-10-03-2017-10-09

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 377 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître *en français*. Un condensé à retrouver sur : http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/9535/ Bonne lecture ! hebdoOSM ? Qui : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où :

[OSM-ja] 半鐘について

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5167330035 なんですが、鉄塔の上に半鐘が付いています。 これ、どうタグ付けたらいいでしょうか。 一応 man_made=tower,tower_type=bell_tower にしています。 ribbon ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

Do I understand this correctly? You are creating tags in the OSM database for your private tool? I hope there is some misunderstanding here, because that isn't acceptable behaviour. Jochen On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 09:33:14AM +, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 09:33:14 + >

[Talk-it] Risposta: Falegnameria / Segheria

Il giorno sab, 14/10/2017 alle 14.30 +0200, liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu ha scritto: > > > > In compenso nella wiki è un pò descritta: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dsawmill > > > craft=sawmill è anche molto usato in effetti. ed esiste anche industrial=sawmill come

Re: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

>-Original Message- >From: demon.box [mailto:e.rossin...@alice.it] >Sent: sabato 14 ottobre 2017 09:54 >To: talk-it@openstreetmap.org >Subject: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria > >ciao, scusate ma qual'è il tag corretto per una semplice falegnameria / >segheria? > >craft=carpenter ? Se

Re: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

Il 14/10/2017 13:54, Damjan Gerl ha scritto: 14.10.2017 - 12:57 - Volker Schmidt: Che cosa intendi con "semplice segheria / falegnameria? Per me sono due cose normalmente separate e distinte: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segheria La versione inglese di segheria e sawmill:

Re: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

2017-10-14 13:54 GMT+02:00 Damjan Gerl: > 14.10.2017 - 12:57 - Volker Schmidt: >> >> Che cosa intendi con "semplice segheria / falegnameria? >> >> Per me sono due cose normalmente separate e distinte: >> https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segheria > > > La versione inglese di segheria e sawmill: >

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

On 14/10/2017 12:06, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: Andy, the query works fine, you probably hit it during the update. That now produces a worldwide map showing where mappers have used a particular tag.  Except in the case of typing errors you shouldn't be changing tagX to tagY without any other

Re: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

14.10.2017 - 12:57 - Volker Schmidt: Che cosa intendi con "semplice segheria / falegnameria? Per me sono due cose normalmente separate e distinte: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segheria La versione inglese di segheria e sawmill: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sawmill ma non la trovo usata in

Re: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

Certo che sono 2 cose ben diverse. Nel mio caso per falegnameria intendo dove con il legno si fabbrica qualcosa ad es. mobili. Per segheria intendo invece dove si lavorano i tronchi grezzi per ricavarne travi, assi, ecc. che poi verranno utilzzate in edilizia piuttosto che da un falegname. Grazie

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

Andy, the query works fine, you probably hit it during the update. Also, I just updated some queries at Quick_fixes - they now able to record when change should be rejected. The IP address has been unchanged ever since I announced the

Re: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

Che cosa intendi con "semplice segheria / falegnameria? Per me sono due cose normalmente separate e distinte: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Segheria https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpentiere oppure https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falegname woodworking è molto generico:

Re: [Talk-se] Cykelbanor och avtagsvägar

Jag skulle sätta det första alternativet,  men kan egentligen inte argumentera för det. Path är oftast spontanstigar, om man tittar på existerande data, iaf i mina trakter. Originalmeddelande Från: Karl-Johan Karlsson Datum: 2017-10-14 12:07

Re: [Talk-se] Cykelbanor och avtagsvägar

Rita in en kort anslutning mellan c-banan och vägen där svängen ska kunma göras ___ Talk-se mailing list Talk-se@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-se

Re: [Talk-se] Cykelbanor och avtagsvägar

Jag är nog inne på samma linje som ni d.v.s. att behålla cykelbanan som en separat väg, så då gör jag så att jag förlänger anslutningsvägen och markerar förlängningen med som cykelväg. När vi ändå är inne på det. Använder ni "highway=cycleway foot=designated" eller "highway=path

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

On Friday 13 October 2017, Yuri Astrakhan wrote: > I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service. It allows > users to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review > each suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on each change if they > think it's a good edit. This is

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo tratto relazione Alpinistica

Il sac_scale va messo sul way individuale e può variare da pezzo a pezzo del sentiero. Il tag cai_scale (ancora in fase di proposta) si applica al sentiero nella sua totalità (e solo

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Réunion OSM à Arlon - OSM Meeting in Arlon - 24 October 2017 at 19.30

Done ! Published on Meetup : https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/events/244198136/ Published on OSMBE calendar : http://www.osm.be/calendar.html Published on Maptime Belgium : http://maptime.io/belgium/event/2017/10/24/meeting-arlon/ I put the "default" description ! Pierre, if you

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

** UPDATE: ** The service now supports "reject" button. To use it, your query must contain " #queryId:... " comment. By default, when a user rejects something, a tag "_autoreject=id" is created. An object can have multiple rejected IDs. If the current query was previously rejected, user will

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

Hi Michael, Currently, the tool creates two changeset tags: created_by=OSM+Wikidata 0.1 comment=(generated by the user's query) What other tags should I add? I know the name is not very good, and I should finalize with it soon to reduce confusion. Also, I just bumped the version to 0.2,

Re: [Talk-se] Cykelbanor och avtagsvägar

Den 2017-10-14 kl. 11:19, skrev Ture Pålsson: Eftersom det är en kantsten mellan cykelbanan och vägen tycker jag det känns vettigt att behålla cykelbanan som en separat way i OSM — en sådan där kantsten är ju inget man korsar hur som helst, utan det kräver lite planering och manövrerande.

Re: [Talk-se] Cykelbanor och avtagsvägar

> 14 okt. 2017 kl. 10:36 skrev Karl-Johan Karlsson > : > > https://www.mapillary.com/app?focus=photo=ZpwBuV8oAsm-mSHwiJmh4g > [ … ] > Hur bör detta ritas om (modelleras) i openstreetmap? Är det bara de få > metrarna där kanten är nedfasad som ska markeras på

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Réunion OSM à Arlon - OSM Meeting in Arlon - 24 October 2017 at 19.30

This is great! Would you mind adding it to the Meetup calender? (or I can do it for you) Op 13 okt. 2017 6:37 p.m. schreef "Pierre Parmentier" < pierrecparment...@gmail.com>: > To the OSM Mappers of the Luxembourg province and around, > > We shall meet on Tuesday 24 October 2017 at 19.30 in

Re: [Talk-se] Cykelbanor och avtagsvägar

Den 2017-10-14 kl. 10:36, skrev Karl-Johan Karlsson: Hur bör detta ritas om (modelleras) i openstreetmap? Är det bara de få metrarna där kanten är nedfasad som ska markeras på något speciellt vis eller ska hela cykelbanan slås samman med bilvägen? Ja, det där känns ju som ett ganska vanligt

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Réunion OSM à Arlon - OSM Meeting in Arlon - 24 October 2017 at 19.30

Good morning Pierre, Do you want me to publish your meetup on our Meetup page : https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Belgium/ ? I'll also publish it in OpenStreetMap Belgium calendar : http://www.osm.be/calendar.html Wish you a pleasant weekend ! Jonathan Le 13-10-17 à 18:36, Pierre

Re: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

Il 14/10/2017 10:37, demon.box ha scritto: nel frattempo ho trovato craft=joiner http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft=joiner che va sicuramente bene per la falegnameria ma invece un segheria non è esattamente la stessa cosa... che dite? grazie --enrico Ho cercato la pura

[OSM-talk-fr] Certificat Osmose expiré

Le certificat de https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/ a expiré aujourd'hui à 00:15 : osmose.openstreetmap.fr uses an invalid security certificate. The certificate expired on 14/10/2017 00:15. The current time is 14/10/2017 10:39. Error code: SEC_ERROR_EXPIRED_CERTIFICATE Quelqu'un peut-il

Re: [Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

nel frattempo ho trovato craft=joiner http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft=joiner che va sicuramente bene per la falegnameria ma invece un segheria non è esattamente la stessa cosa... che dite? grazie --enrico -- Sent from:

[Talk-se] Cykelbanor och avtagsvägar

https://www.mapillary.com/app?focus=photo=ZpwBuV8oAsm-mSHwiJmh4g Vad man ser på denna Mapillary bild är alltså en cykelbana. Vad som kanske inte framgår tydligt på bilden är att det är en stensatt kant på ca 10 cm ner till vägen, men eftersom det är en avtagsväg till vänster på bilden (som det är

Re: [Talk-it] Ultimo tratto relazione Alpinistica

Direi di no: la difficoltà per chi intraprende il percorso della relazione é sempre quella del tratto peggiore è il viaggiatore é meglio lo sappia. Se hai info dettagliate, assegna i relativi tag alle way, spezzandole all'occorrenza. Il 14/ott/2017 08:57, "angelo mornata"

[Talk-it] Falegnameria / Segheria

ciao, scusate ma qual'è il tag corretto per una semplice falegnameria / segheria? craft=carpenter ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dcarpenter ...non mi sembra esattamente quello giusto. grazie --enrico -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html

Re: [OSM-talk] New OSM Quick-Fix service

Hi Yuri, Am 2017-10-13 um 23:25 schrieb Yuri Astrakhan: > I would like to introduce a new quick-fix editing service. It allows users > to generate a list of editing suggestions using a query, review each > suggestion one by one, and click "Save" on each change if they think it's a > good edit. >

[Talk-it] Ultimo tratto relazione Alpinistica

In una Relazione, quando l'ultimo tratto è alpinistico va Divisa, e fatta una relazione a parte per il suddetto tratto? Esempio: Partenza, arrivo al bivacco una relazione, bivacco cima un'altra relazione? Che Ref va messo su una via Alpinistica? Grazie e scusate l'ignoranza Angelo