[Talk-us] Center turn lane mapping

Hi all, I had a discussion about center turn lane mapping with my team this morning, and I wrote a diary about it proposing one consistent scheme to tag them. Not a new scheme, but using the existing lanes / turn:lanes schema as already implemented by the JOSM plugin, in favor of the

[Talk-ca] Fwd: Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Other bounced message..Sorry. -- Forwarded message -- From: Martijn van Exel <mve...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:22 AM Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs To: john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Darwin <matt...@mdarw

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

with the name:[ISO language code] tag. Martijn Martijn van Exel skype: mvexel On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Matthew Darwin <matt...@mdarwin.ca> wrote: > No, > > This is about the "desination" sign that you find on major highways, > usually they are green. &q

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Are there any NB mappers here? If not we can extract the most active mappers from the data and ask directly. (That is how we usually go about this if we have a local question where nobody from the area seems to be on the national mailing list.) Martijn van Exel skype: mvexel On Mon, Oct 2, 2017

Re: [Talk-ca] OSM Canada & State of the Map US: Oct 20-22

community at large to move in that direction. Martijn Martijn van Exel skype: mvexel On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Matthew Darwin <matt...@mdarwin.ca> wrote: > Hi, > > Are any Canadian folks going to State of the Map US October 20-22 > https://2017.stateofthemap.us/ > >

[Talk-ca] Fwd: Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Sorry, I sent this and the next message from the wrong email and it bounced because of that.. -- Forwarded message -- From: Martijn van Exel <mve...@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:20 AM Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs To: Matthew Darwin

Re: [OSM-talk] A thought on bot edits

I find this discussion and your proposal interesting to explore, at least as a hypothetical. Do we know 1) what the volume of bot edits is and how it has grown 2) how many mappers have actually given up based upon this? My guess is that instead of coming up with a global solution, this could be

Re: [Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

vert.canada.ca/data/fr/dataset/3d282116-e556-400c- > 9306-ca1a3cada77f > > cordialement > > Pierre > > > -------------- > *De :* john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> > *À :* Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> > *Cc :* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

I sense a topic for the next Many Mappy Minutes or a BOF at State of the Map US —> cleaning up old imports. I sure appreciate all the knowledge shared here! So much I didn’t know about GNIS data. Martijn > On Sep 30, 2017, at 11:54 AM, Wolfgang Zenker > wrote: > >

Re: [Talk-us] dubious church node

If you are interested in cleaning up some of the GNIS imported features in a more structured manner, we can create a MapRoulette challenge. In fact, there is one already that we can model more of them after. Give it a try: http://maproulette.org/map/2774

[Talk-ca] Mapping of bilingual destination signs

Hi all, How do you map bilingual signposts? Ones that say for example 'Rue Regent St'? My thought would be destination:street=[name in primary language for the province] and destination:street:en / destination:street:fr for the name in the other language. But I've also seen just

Re: [Talk-ca] OSM Canada & State of the Map US: Oct 20-22

Hi all, I responded to Matthew off-list an on, but my response bounced to here because I used an alternate email address. Speaking as the secretary of the OSMF board and non-Canadian: we welcome new Local Chapters and any movement towards that. A first step is to gain sufficient momentum; a

[Talk-us] Mappy Hour / Many Mappy Minutes

Hi all, We had our first virtual mappy hour tonight and it was a lot of fun to chat with fellow mappers. I wrote a short diary post about it, also announcing the next edition on November 1: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/42393 Martijn

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

on this. Thanks, Martijn On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 6:27 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 27.09.2017 06:43, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > In your email from Aug 28 you proposed to wait a while as a first step > > to gather some feedback on your assessment. D

Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Hi Frederik, In your email from Aug 28 you proposed to wait a while as a first step to gather some feedback on your assessment. Did you receive any? When do you think you want to proceed with the redaction? Anything we can do to help? I can assist with preparing the MapRoulette challenge to

Re: [Talk-us] Virtual Mappy Hours reboot

Hi folks! This is a reminder that we will have our first osm fireside chat / mappy hour tomorrow! I will be looking forward to see you then. Martijn > On Sep 18, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Martijn van Exel <mart...@openstreetmap.us> > wrote: > > Hey all, > > I decided to give

[Talk-ca] Gathering opinions on organized editing

Hi US / CA mappers, The OSMF Data Working Group is currently conducting a community survey on ‘organized editing’. It would be great if as many of you as possible could give them feedback. You can find the full post and a discussion thread here:

[Talk-us] Gathering opinions on organized editing

Hi US / CA mappers, The OSMF Data Working Group is currently conducting a community survey on ‘organized editing’. It would be great if as many of you as possible could give them feedback. You can find the full post and a discussion thread here:

Re: [Talk-ca] Les méfaits de Telenav dans La Prairie

pris des photos près du > rond-point. Elles devraient apparaitre bientôt sur Mapillary. Les sentiers > sont obstrués avec des barrières et seuls les piétons peuvent y circuler. > > Pierre > > > De : Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> > À : James <james2...@gm

Re: [Talk-ca] Les méfaits de Telenav dans La Prairie

Hi all, Allow me to respond in English...Sorry.. Thanks for pointing out the problem with the non-existing roads. We did some additional research ourselves as well after your report and concluded the same thing. Checking two sources in this case proved to be not enough, and I will make sure we

[Talk-us] Virtual Mappy Hours reboot

Hey all, I decided to give the Virtual Mappy Hours another go. The first one will be next Wednesday at 5:30 pacific. We’ll talk about State of the Map US. I hope you can join! Details are in this diary entry: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mvexel/diary/42318

Re: [Talk-us] wtsp.com using OSM for detour maps

Hi, > On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:27 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Martijn van Exel <mart...@openstreetmap.us > <mailto:mart...@openstreetmap.us>> wrote: >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Bill Ricker <b

Re: [Talk-us] wtsp.com using OSM for detour maps

Hi, > On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Bill Ricker wrote: > > ​Hour by hour? Do we expect it to? > No, but closures that last more than, say, a few days would be useful to have, as long as we can figure out a way to be sure that OSM is again updated when the road is

Re: [Talk-us] wtsp.com using OSM for detour maps

That is pretty cool :) Always nice to see use of OSM especially when attribution is OK. Is the current road closure situation adequately reflected in the OSM data as well? Martijn > On Sep 13, 2017, at 10:06 PM, James Mast wrote: > >

Re: [Talk-us] KML additions

Hi Scott, From your signature I gather this is in the U.S.? I will forward your message to the OpenStreetMap US community mailing list, they will follow up with you. Best, Martijn van Exel > On Sep 11, 2017, at 11:14 AM, Scott Benson <i...@bensonixd.com> wrote: > > Hi

Re: [Talk-us] Gender in OpenStreetMap

Marc, > On Sep 5, 2017, at 10:54 PM, Marc Gemis wrote: > > What I am missing from all the statistics that we already have about > mappers today, is how divers we map. This can be done e.g. by counting > the number of different amenities, shops, crafts, leisures that a >

Re: [Talk-us] South Bay community meetup, Sept. 23 in San Jose

That's great. I forwarded to some of my SV contacts who I know are interested in OSM. Good luck! Sent from my iPad > On Aug 30, 2017, at 10:17, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > We're (re)starting an OpenStreetMap community in the South Bay, starting with > a meetup in San

Re: [Talk-us] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr

Happy to help. All we'd need for MapRoulette is a list of locations and a proper description of the work we'd expect people to do. Anyone can create the challenge but I'd be happy to do it. Martijn On Sun, Aug 27, 2017, 11:40 Frederik Ramm wrote: > Steve: > > thank you for

Re: [OSM-talk] Thanks for cooperation to SOTM 2017

Jun, It was my pleasure to meet you in Aizu-Wakamatsu and enjoy a very well organized, fun and educational SOTM. Among my personal highlights (besides the high quality talks) were the group picture ceremony on the historic castle grounds, the group dinner and ensuing karaoke fun, and meeting

Re: [OSM-talk] MapRoulette questionnaire

Hi all, SOTM is coming up and I will be doing a talk on MapRoulette there. I will incorporate the results of my questionnaire from earlier this year and announce the mappy prize winner there too. If they are in the audience they will be able to receive their prize right then and there,

[Talk-us] MapRoulette find your challenge? Your opinions please.

Hi all,  I have not been happy with how hard it is for a user of MapRoulette to find interesting challenges. I am looking for input on how to make that easier. A short blog post explaining more is at  http://blog.improve-osm.org/en/2017/07/find-your-maproulette-challenge/ .  While we think

[OSM-talk-fr] French LC Application

une 30. I am looking forward to hearing your responses. Best regards, Martijn van Exel Secretary, OpenStreetMap Foundation mart...@osmfoundation.org ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [Talk-us] [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

-80.04410#map=19/40.58648/-80.04457 > > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car=40.58614%2C-80.04461%3B40.58680%2C-80.04410#map=19/40.58648/-80.04457> > From: Stewart C. Russell <scr...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 7:26:12 PM > To: talk...@openstre

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

-80.04410#map=19/40.58648/-80.04457 > > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car=40.58614%2C-80.04461%3B40.58680%2C-80.04410#map=19/40.58648/-80.04457> > From: Stewart C. Russell <scr...@gmail.com> > Sent: Friday, March 31, 2017 7:26:12 PM > To: talk-ca@openstre

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

scussion. I don't touch the road network too > much in my mapping unless I am pretty sure what I'm changing is obviously > correct and simple, and I avoid weird intersections as much as possible. I'm > just curious to understand, so maybe in the future if I happen across such a > si

Re: [Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

Hi Andrew (and let me reply to Pierre's comments too, sorry Pierre, I am a little slow parsing French). First off thanks for your additional comments, they are really useful. I realize that I should have shared more detail about what we are planning to do and will do a better job in the future

[OSM-talk] MapRoulette down, disk full

Hi, The MapRoulette server’s disk ran out of space. Please accept my apologies for the downtime while I work to get it back up. Martijn ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Maproulette problems?

Apologies for the lack of contact info. For the record you can always email me (m...@rtijn.org ) or maproule...@maproulette.org There’s also a MR mailing list (very low traffic) on the OpenStreetMap listserv. Thanks for filing bugs,

Re: [Talk-us] tagging rumble-strip-separated road shoulders

> On Feb 4, 2017, at 10:34 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > Wishlist item for overpass-turbo...shorter URLs. Seriously link gore there. > The Share button in the top bar provides a shortened URL for any query.___ Talk-us mailing

Re: [OSM-talk] SOTM EU

> On Jan 31, 2017, at 3:25 PM, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote: > > (More seriously, there were rumours of an event in Italy, but I've not heard > anything concrete.) > Thank you, Richard! Martijn van Exel ___ t

Re: [OSM-talk] SOTM EU

Here I thought I was asking a simple question. Anyone who actually knows if there are plans for a followup for http://stateofthemap.eu/ <http://stateofthemap.eu/> ? Martijn van Exel > On Jan 19, 2017, at 6:21 PM, Tomek Jablonski <dziabadu...@outlook.com> wrote: > > W dn

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM then and now revived

The once-and-for-all solution would be a full history DB schema from which vector tiles could be extracted for any point in time. Martijn van Exel > On Jan 30, 2017, at 1:26 PM, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > On 2017-01-30 12:07, Simon Poole wrote: >> I sus

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetCam plugin

Looks like an issue on our end — we’re looking into it. Thanks for reporting. Martijn van Exel > On Jan 30, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Rod Bera <r...@goarem.org> wrote: > > Hi Martijn, > > When trying to install the plugin I get a message saying > that downloading failed,

Re: [Talk-ca] [Imports] Ottawa Buildings & Addresses [Statistics Canada project]

in the process of making these actions more visible to the community.) Martijn van Exel > On Jan 28, 2017, at 6:20 AM, Stewart C. Russell <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Denis, > >> We've already imported data under the City of Ottawa license, all of the >> OC

Re: [OSM-talk] OSM then and now revived

a way to convert 0.3 / 0.4 planets to 0.6. There is a script to convert from 0.4 to 0.5 but I don’t know of anything that can handle 0.3 planets. Martijn van Exel > On Jan 28, 2017, at 5:08 PM, joost schouppe <joost.schou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Any chance we'll see some mid

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetCam plugin

Rod — what if any messages do you get, or how does it fail? I don’t think we are at version 42 yet — OpenStreetCam plugin release is version 32, the deprecated OpenStreetView plugin is version 31. Anyone else experiencing problems with installing it? Martijn van Exel > On Jan 27, 2017, at

[OSM-talk] OSM then and now revived

://mvexel.github.io/thenandnow/#15/50.8178/4.3971 <http://mvexel.github.io/thenandnow/#15/50.8178/4.3971> Martijn van Exel ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] OpenStreetCam plugin

Hi all, I wanted to ask your opinion about the OpenStreetCam JOSM plugin. If you haven’t tried it, it’s in the JOSM plugin store. What are the top things you would want to see improved? What is working well? Perhaps you have a desire to help out with development? We are planning further

Re: [Talk-us] U.S.-Mexico border fence update

We could devise a MapRoulette challenge out of it (and could claim that OpenStreetMap has a tight border with Mexico before the Trump administration, AND nobody paid for it) Martijn > On Jan 23, 2017, at 4:35 PM, Clifford Snow > wrote:

Re: [Talk-us] I think I got this right...

-relation for cardinal direction, relations for each direction. > On Jan 23, 2017, at 12:12 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org > <mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org>> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org > <mailto:m...@rtijn.

Re: [Talk-us] I think I got this right...

relationship hierarchy. What is your thought on indicating cardinal direction in this case if not as member role? Martijn van Exel > On Jan 22, 2017, at 5:24 AM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:11 PM, <richiekenned...@gmail.com >

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

The license link is broken, is it this one? http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/get-know-your-city/open-data#open-data-licence-version-2-0 <http://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/get-know-your-city/open-data#open-data-licence-version-2-0> Martijn van Exel > On Jan 20, 2017, at 12:40 PM, Ellefs

Re: [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] [Tagging] destination:street

]. Would that then be destination:street=1300 So.;2100 So. and destination:ref=201 and destination:West Valley? The advantage of having a separate tag partly vanishes when you still need the semicolon separator? Martijn van Exel [1] http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/destination%3Astreet#map <h

Re: [Talk-us] [Tagging] destination:street

]. Would that then be destination:street=1300 So.;2100 So. and destination:ref=201 and destination:West Valley? The advantage of having a separate tag partly vanishes when you still need the semicolon separator? Martijn van Exel [1] http://taginfo.osm.org/keys/destination%3Astreet#map <h

Re: [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] destination:street

In the US the prefix would typically be in the network tag, like network=US:US ref=89 for US highway 89, etc. We have seen some of this in Canada as well. (CA:ON for Ontario highways etc.) Martijn van Exel > On Jan 20, 2017, at 12:57 AM, Paul Norman <penor...@mac.com> wrote: > >

[Talk-us] destination:street

want to go. Happy mapping, Martijn van Exel ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

[Talk-ca] destination:street

want to go. Happy mapping, Martijn van Exel ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-us] cardinal directions

Martijn van Exel > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org > <mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote: > I am trying to be consistent with the outcome of the discussion t

Re: [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] cardinal directions

Martijn van Exel > On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org > <mailto:m...@rtijn.org>> wrote: > I am trying to be consistent with the outcome of the discussion t

[OSM-talk] SOTM EU

Hi all, I am curious — are there plans for a SOTM EU this year? Martijn ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-ca] [Talk-us] cardinal directions

of info to ways makes it impossible to validate / maintain. This also does not have to preclude having separate e/w or n/s relations + a super relation — I think that is actually good practice for big relations to keep them manageable. Martijn van Exel > On Jan 13, 2017, at 11:40 PM, P

[Talk-us] cardinal directions

Hi all, Some of you may remember the discussion we had on tagging cardinal directions in the US, which led to the wiki page[1] describing the current practice. Basically the convention we arrived on is to tag relation members with role=north/east/south/west to indicate cardinal direction. This

Re: [Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2016-12-17

-us-requ...@openstreetmap.org> wrote: [Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2016-12-17 ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us -- Martijn van Exel OpenStreetMap US mart...@openstreet

[Talk-us] Election update

the ballot with the help of an independent observer. We expect this process to take a few more days. We thank you for your patience as we are getting ready to publish the final results. -- Martijn van Exel OpenStreetMap US mart...@openstreetmap.us

[Talk-us] Vote!

Hi all, Voting for the next OSM US chapter board is underway and open until Sunday night! Check your email for a link that leads you to the voting form. The subject line is "Vote now for your OpenStreetMap US board”. If you did not receive it and you think you should have, please contact

[OSM-talk] more missing roads on ImproveOSM

Hi all, Telenav partnered with INRIX to add more than 800.000 more missing road tiles to ImproveOSM worldwide. If you haven’t tried ImproveOSM, it’s a tool that points out potential missing roads, one-way streets and turn restrictions based on the analysis of billions of GPS points. Give it

Re: [Talk-us] new relation page

I added bike route support. I still have not deployed it but I think we may be able to get it on the osm.us server. Martijn Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I haven't actually deplo

Re: [OSM-talk] MapRoulette down

own using an Overpass query or your own GeoJSON data? Let me know if you need any help with MapRoulette! Martijn Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > MapRoulette is down for a bit while

[OSM-talk] MapRoulette down

Hi all, MapRoulette is down for a bit while we work through a technical issue. I will update when it's resolved. My apologies! Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org

[Talk-us] new relation pages

it. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] manifesto

It was copied from last year but we originally planned to close nominations around that time. Now that we have only four candidates for five positions we have no choice but to extend. Martijn > On Nov 30, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Paul Norman wrote: > > On 11/30/2016 9:30 AM,

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme -- by a specific date

well defined point in future time. To the best of my understanding the opening_hours tag does not help with that. Thoughts? Martijn Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: > I'm note quite sure why this use case

Re: [OSM-talk] [Tagging] fixme -- by a specific date

that also goes beyond 'seasonality'. What do you think? [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:seasonal Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Bill Ricker <bill.n1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Martijn van Exel

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme -- by a specific date

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44013342 for a tagging example. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Hi, > > When mapping seasonal closures here in Utah[1] I realized I am still > m

[OSM-talk] fixme -- by a specific date

of proposed or under-construction features for which you may know a projected start / finish date. Or semi-permanent features that you know will disappear at some point. I know HOT has interest in this kind of 'lifecycle' tagging as well. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ [1] A lot of fairly major

[OSM-talk] OpenStreetView name change

Hi all, A few months ago, we started with OpenStreetView, the free and open street level imagery project made 100% for OSM with apps for Android and iOS. Since then, we not only have collected almost 30 kilometers of coverage, but also received a lot of attention from both you and the press.

Re: [Talk-us] MapRoulette Rail Crossings challenge

Thanks Mike! Looking forward to fixing more of these. I hope others do too! Martijn Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Mike N <nice...@att.net> wrote: > > I've brought back the MapRoulette US Railway crossings challenge with a > sl

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

notation, but I am not certain. Martijn Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Stewart C. Russell <scr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2016-10-28 10:45 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > It's not documented that way anywhere that I could find. The col

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

Looks like these have all been resolved! Thanks all for your help. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Just ran the overpass query again and we're down to 1421 relations with > underscore network tag

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

is does not give you any geometry. Martijn Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > I created a spreadsheet to track the relations and fixes. It doesn't lend > itself well to a MapRoulette challenge or I woul

Re: [Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

if this is workable. Martijn Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Denis Carriere <carriere.de...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with Martjin, those tags should be corrected to *network*=CA:ON > > Good catch! > > *~~* > *Denis Carriere* &

[Talk-us] Slack

to https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/ and we will take it from there. Welcome! Tell your friends! Martijn van Exel US Chapter OpenStreetMap http://openstreetmap.us/ http://osm.org/ skype: mvexel ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https

[Talk-ca] Slack

-invite yourself. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

[Talk-ca] Road route relations: network tag

together? It's about 400 relations in total, mostly in Ontario. [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Hierarchical_format - it has a Canada example! Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Elections coming up!

it will be broadcast live. I will send a reminder shortly before the event. Martijn On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 3:55 PM Martijn van Exel <m...@rtijn.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > The current board (Alyssa Wright, Drishtie Patel, Alex Barth, Ian Dees and > me, Martijn van Exel) is about to end its t

[Talk-us] Elections coming up!

Hi all, The current board (Alyssa Wright, Drishtie Patel, Alex Barth, Ian Dees and me, Martijn van Exel) is about to end its term, and elections are called for! These will happen in the second half of November. You should consider becoming a candidate! Anyone who is a member of the US chapter

Re: [Talk-ca] MapRoulette challenges

Yes, they did, and they mainly focused on the main metros I believe. The remaining ones should be mainly outside of the larger urban areas. See http://maproulette.org/view/499 for locations of the tasks. Martijn Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/ On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:55 AM, James

[Talk-ca] MapRoulette challenges

Hi all, I hope you are aware of MapRoulette! If not, it's a micro-tasking tool for OSM where you can solve small problems / make small enhancements to OSM data in a randomized fashion. You may not be aware that there are quite a few Canada specific challenges already. One of them was drawn up by

[OSM-talk] Texas Cemeteries now with better imagery

Hi all, I started a collaboration with folks at the Texas State government a while ago, to see if we can get some of their data into OSM in a way that is fun and involves mappers. We decided to start with something simple: let's compare their point data in cemetery locations with what's in OSM,

[Talk-us] Texas Cemeteries now with better imagery

Hi all, I started a collaboration with folks at the Texas State government a while ago, to see if we can get some of their data into OSM in a way that is fun and involves mappers. We decided to start with something simple: let's compare their point data in cemetery locations with what's in OSM,

[Talk-ca] Telenav mapping turn restrictions

Hi all, I wanted to give you a heads up that my colleagues on the Telenav map team are starting work on adding turn restrictions in Toronto, Montréal, and later on also Vancouver, Ottawa and Calgary. We are using OpenStreetView and Mapillary as sources. If you have any questions or concerns,

Re: [OSM-talk] GeoServer and OpenStreetMap

I’ve done it the PostGIS route before which has worked well: * Download OSM PBF * Create PostGIS database * Apply osmosis schema + linestring extension * Import OSM data using osmosis * Connect desired PostGIS tables to Geoserver Martijn > On Sep 29, 2016, at 6:19 AM, Nick Hocking

[OSM-talk] Please donate today to keep OSM running smoothly and independently!

Hi all, The OSM Foundation (of which I am a board member) is holding its about-annual donation drive. We are already at a little over 10% of our €70k (~USD 78k) goal, so we have a substantial amount still to go. OSMF runs a very lean organization, but we will still need money[1] to keep

[Talk-us] Please donate today to keep OSM running smoothly and independently!

Hi all, The OSM Foundation (of which I am a board member) is holding its about-annual donation drive. We are already at a little over 10% of our €70k (~USD 78k) goal, so we have a substantial amount still to go. OSMF runs a very lean organization, but we will still need money[1] to keep

[Talk-ca] Please donate today to keep OSM running smoothly and independently!

Hi all, The OSM Foundation (of which I am a board member) is holding its about-annual donation drive. We are already at a little over 10% of our €70k (~USD 78k) goal, so we have a substantial amount still to go. OSMF runs a very lean organization, but we will still need money[1] to keep

Re: [Talk-ca] Canvec attributes (roads)

On 09/12/2016 06:50 PM, Stewart C. Russell wrote: On 2016-09-12 04:08 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: Aren't these files grouped by feature type? So if we look at roads we wouldn't also necessarily need to look at land use boundaries etc.? Canvec - the product supplied by NRCan to the general

Re: [Talk-ca] Canvec attributes (roads)

Aren't these files grouped by feature type? So if we look at roads we wouldn't also necessarily need to look at land use boundaries etc.? At least that's what I am getting looking at http://geogratis.gc.ca/api/en/nrcan-rncan/ess-sst/23387971-b6d3-4ded-a40b-c8e832b4ea08.html -- Martijn van Exel

Re: [Talk-ca] Canvec attributes (roads)

somewhere?) -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org On Fri, Sep 9, 2016, at 15:54, Paul Norman wrote: > On 9/9/2016 2:34 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > The conflation engine takes OSM PBF as input, so the Canvec shapefiles > > would need to be translated (using ogr2osm). > >

[Talk-ca] Canvec attributes (roads)

mvexel/diary/37808 [2]http://ftp.geogratis.gc.ca/pub/nrcan_rncan/vector/canvec/doc/CanVec_Catalogue_50K_Transport/SRDB_EXPL_ESSIM_50K_Transport-sd-en.html#div-1330009 -- Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-ca] ImproveOSM new beta

Hi all, I don’t know how familiar you are with ImproveOSM. It’s Telenav’s big data thrown at OSM. We detect missing roads, missing turn restrictions, and one-way streets. There is a JOSM plugin as well as a web site. The web site is what I wanted to highlight. We are about to overhaul it and

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >