Hi Clive,
Welcome to OSM! I started in Reading way back in 2005, and am answering as
someone who doesn't have a car...
Personally I think separate ways are a plague, unless there is a really
clear physical separation of what is effectively a footpath, or as David
says a signposted and quite
e seen for example along Southwark Street SE1, we can use
>gis to investigate stations based on proximity to those already mapped
>
>
> presumably these questions affect all kinds of open data release, so it
> will be good to get used to dealing with such matters
>
>
> joe
> -
Hi Joe,
This would be great. Welcome to the list. I used to work at the GLA
(2009-16) and am glad to see you proposing this.
Others will have a better idea of the process, but I'd think a first step
would be to create a wiki page and set out the datasets you have,
indicating for each one any
given the estate name. Again,
this might be a good opportunity to get a consistent approach?
Best wishes,
Tom
*Tom Chance*
*Housing policy and programmes consultant*
*m: 07866 447 075*
*w: *http://tomchance.org
On 17 August 2017 at 12:18, Nicolas Fonty <fonty.nico...@gmail.com> wrote:
so and try again :)
>
> --
> Neil
>
>
> On 28 April 2016 at 08:08, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.net> wrote:
>
>> Okay, another one with a problem.
>>
>> Using the exact same query for this ward relation:
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/r
, but not all, and not the ways within the
boundary:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fWj
Any suggestions gratefully received!
Tom
web: http://tomchance.org
twitter: http://twitter.com/tom_chance
facebook: http://www.facebook.com/TomChanceGP
On 25 April 2016 at 16:45, Tom Chance <t...@acrewoods.
)
> If the ways missing were part of the relation then I think
> way(r.A)[highway][name] should select them too, but that's not how the
> relation is composed.
>
> Hope that gives some other ideas, if nothing else :)
>
> --
> Neil
>
>
> On 23 April 2016 at 14:20, Tom Chance <
Hi all,
It has been a very long time since I last posted here!
I'm trying to use the Overpass API to extract all the roads within the
bounds of a relation, in this case a local government ward. Can anyone spot
the problem in the data?
Here's the example I'm working with:
Could someone contact / chase up these new users and remove their edits?
Could be vandalism, or just people not realising what they're doing.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/panchal%20chetana/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Solanki%20yuvraj/history
Hi Antje,
To answer your questions...
On 13 December 2014 at 00:59, Antje wrote:
1. Will Quietways be numbered for easy reference?
This isn't yet 100% clear, but it looks likely.
2. Will Quietways completely entail the start of the gradual phase-out of
the current LCN and LCN+ system so
in as they are many years
ago so it’s good to have a look again. It’s not about tagging for the
renderer or even tagging for logic. It’s just tagging for the real world.
Cheers
Andy
*From:* John Baker [mailto:rovas...@hotmail.com]
*Sent:* 19 November 2014 17:27
*To:* Tom Chance; talk-gb
Hello there,
As somebody who dislikes change, I was slightly horrified to see these
edits:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26783815
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26795471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26567938
The user has changed a whole lot of places within London
a look again. It’s not about tagging for the
renderer or even tagging for logic. It’s just tagging for the real world.
Cheers
Andy
*From:* John Baker [mailto:rovas...@hotmail.com]
*Sent:* 19 November 2014 17:27
*To:* Tom Chance; talk-gb OSM List E-mail
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Suburbs
I'd echo Andy's comments, particularly about politely contacting all new
users in your neck of the woods.
My principal difficulty is in working out what people have done in each
changeset. The best tool we had for this - OWL - is now defunct. This let
you browse around the area looking at all
Could somebody revert all of these?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/liuchao/history
I have contacted the user.
Tom
--
http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Cross-posting for Londoners not on the London list...
If anybody is at a loose end on Saturday, I'm running an OSM stall in
Crystal Palace as part of an initiative to create pedestrian maps of the
area. More details here:
On 29 April 2014 17:24, Derick Rethans o...@derickrethans.nl wrote:
I wouldn't not just trace, without also having a look. Also, this is a
lot of work.
I think this depends on your purpose and the area.
If you just need to know here be buildings then there's no need to visit
the area. But if
Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
I've had a definite from Andy Mabbett to do this and a possibly from Tom
Chance. At this stage I think it's best to confirm on Andy Mabbett. If
that's OK can Andy pick up on the use cases that have been mentioned here
to get more info from
I could possibly do this, I've done various projects to do with mapping
trees and know a fair amount about tree and climate change policy. But I'm
not an expert on the underlying OSM data model and API. If anyone wanted to
chip in thoughts on stable URIs I'm all ears.
Tom
On 4 March 2014 08:33,
Thanks for the additional info, Jerry.
I know that councils and utility companies don't know where a lot of old
pipes and cables are, but they must have started to retain details maps and
data of these in the recent past?
It was Southwark, not Lambeth, where I imported the trees, by the way.
On 14 January 2014 14:15, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote:
On 14 January 2014 14:06, Jonathan Harley j...@spiffymap.net wrote:
Jonathan Moules of Warwickshire County Council came to a midlands
OSM meet on Saturday and told us about it, and subsequently confirmed in
email to several
Hello,
A little while ago Amaroussi posted a diary entry about people adding
bitcoin payment info to OSM objects:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Amaroussi/diary/20772
I've just spotted somebody adding a node that looks like it's solely for
the purpose of showing up on listings like CoinMap:
Thanks for the comments, everyone, I never like to delete data unless I'm
really sure it's inappropriate. It's very annoying when your work is
deleted by somebody with a bee in their bonnet!
Tom
On 22 January 2014 17:12, Derick Rethans o...@derickrethans.nl wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Tom
Well spotted! Getting a hold of the curriculum materials would be a good
place to start, so we could look for opportunities for them to learn about
OSM.
Regards,
Tom
On 31 December 2013 11:05, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
I've just read in a magazine that GIS is now
Hello,
A user who makes lots of edits all over the globe without comments came by
my neck of the woods 8 days ago and made various damaging changes:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19400206
This changeset includes the deletion of dozens of trees, new nodes for
amenities that already
On 13 October 2013 00:26, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/401
This block now appears to have expired, because the user is back to his/her
old tricks again:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19463227
Regards,
Tom
--
Christian,
I'd be happy to add some of these, what is the tagging schema?
Tom
On 10 October 2013 15:42, cquest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr wrote:
Hello dear GB neighbours (I'm from the other side of the channel, the
froggy
side).
In order to simplify data reuse, I've started adding ISO3166-2
On 29 September 2013 18:52, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm really after moral backing that this is a breach, as I'd be surprised
if
they took my word for it. They have an investment in quite a few bus
routes
that they, probably, wouldn't want redacted.
You definitely
unclear
as to whether this can be dealt with in the community (mailing lists?) or
by the DWG.
Anyhow, can somebody block/ban this user?
Tom
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net
Date: 11 September 2013 20:11
Subject: User with long list of slow vandalism
On 23 September 2013 12:22, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
It seems you have already repaired the most obvious damage yourself.
Of the changesets in my local area - others covered some other edits.
Indeed DWG prefers it if such issues can be resolved by the community
through
On 23 September 2013 12:27, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The edits seem to be seriously incompetent, rather than actually
bogus, or malicious.
I'm not sure, they are strange edits. On the one hand there are some
outlines of actual features, on the other hand there are
* random
On 23 September 2013 16:01, OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
* changesets with the same comment that doesn't correspond with the
thing they have traced, like This is a House
Unfortunately, like subjects on many PC support forums, the average
contributor doesn't seem to be able
On 10 September 2013 09:56, Ed Loach edlo...@gmail.com wrote:
New mappers are likely to make mistakes whatever editing software
they use.
That's true. What I noticed with these landuse areas is:
(a) the beginnings of a pattern, suggesting a defect in the software
(b) that these changes are
but perhaps it is a little too easy encouraging
people to edit before they are actually aware of the impact they can have?
Just a thought...
-
Paul Churchley
http://about.me/paulchurchley
On 7 September 2013 23:09, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
I've seen two new users accidentally delete
I've seen two new users accidentally delete residential landuse areas near
me in the past fortnight:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17695130
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/17505646
Could this be a problem with the iD editor? Has anyone else noticed it?
Tom
--
You could also have a look at, and perhaps update, other probation offices.
There are a few scattered about:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=probation#values
If you search for the names on the main OSM page you can find them to
inspect the tagging.
Tom
On 7 August 2013 14:11,
On 1 June 2013 22:33, sk53.osm sk53@gmail.com wrote:
Personally I favour a name=Welsh Name / English Name, name:cy=Welsh Name,
name:en=English Name approach, as used for instance in Brussels on OSM and
officially in Biel / Bienne in Switzerland (one of the few places there
which is truly
Oh no! Brain... conflicted. OSM maps, new road building!
Tom
On 21 May 2013 14:21, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
I see that today's announcement of a government consultation on the
options for a new Lower Thames Crossing (https://www.gov.uk/**
On 10 May 2013 12:54, Andrew andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
Some retailers seem to cause particular problems in choosing an
appropriate tag. Wilkinsons are variously tagged as supermarkets,
hardware, variety and department_store. In addition the name is often
entered without the 's'.
I have always operated on the assumption that you only split the road into
two ways if they are physically separated by a barrier, I'm pretty sure
that has been the consensus practice for a good six years.
Regards,
Tom
On 7 May 2013 12:27, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
I
Is this an official designation? If not, I'm not sure it's appropriate to
add it to OSM. Otherwise the database would be flooded with community
boundaries - neighbourhood watch, associations, clubs, political groups,
etc.
Tom
On May 4, 2013 12:11 PM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 30 April 2013 22:20, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
The current OSM website rendering seems to be geared towards urban
environments but hopefully with the developments being walked about this
will be improved. It can be difficult to get an overview of field
boundary
Nice find, I've contacted them to ask if they would like to add them to
OSM, or publish the measurements somewhere under the ODBL.
Regards,
Tom
On 30 April 2013 08:05, Kevin Peat k...@k3v.eu wrote:
On 29 Apr 2013 22:01, Rovastar rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:
Great however the OSM
On 30 April 2013 09:38, Henry Gomersall h...@cantab.net wrote:
Am I the only one that has been drawing walls and not fields? It's nice
to have fields as individual logical units, but they're defined by the
walls, so it strikes me the wall should be the defining characteristic.
Is this a
On 30 April 2013 12:32, Henry Gomersall h...@cantab.net wrote:
Does meadow mean grazing land? Do we define high fell land as meadow
as well when it's used for grazing sheep?
Perhaps a landuse=grazing should be available.
If you wanted to define field types, I'd suggest the following tags.
On 25 April 2013 19:57, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to take take the conversation into another orbit simultaneously, I'd
like to clarify Tom's remarks about natural=wood and landuse=forest being
interchangeable in the UK. I always tag landuse=forest where aerial
imagery
I can sympathise with some of what Jerry, John and Frederik have said here.
There is undoubtedly a lot of slightly inappropriate tagging in the
database, meaning that serious use of the data often requires a lot of
cleaning up. I went around Southwark changing lots of land uses but based
on
On 23 April 2013 10:55, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Copied also to talk-gb.
The problem is where do we stop? The majority of present/potential boundary
data doesn't have a physical presence on the ground. Consider ONS Lower,
middle and other output area boundaries or the NAPTAN
On 23 April 2013 10:55, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Copied also to talk-gb.
The problem is where do we stop? The majority of present/potential boundary
data doesn't have a physical presence on the ground. Consider ONS Lower,
middle and other output area boundaries or the NAPTAN
You can always call the BBC up and ask if they would like a quote to give
the piece balance. The Beeb love their balance, they get nervous if you
suggest a piece lacks balance.
So you'd suggest that the article includes a quote from critics who point
out that the data is only available to Google,
On 11 April 2013 14:53, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote:
In case people haven't noticed, the article has been updated with a quote
from Chris about OSM.
Well done!
Tom
--
http://tom.acrewoods.net http://twitter.com/tom_chance
___
On 8 April 2013 12:13, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
Nothing in the credits. Is it worth looking into this?
Nice spot, but I'm not sure that we want to require everyone who shows a
web site using OSM tiles or data to attribute us? The web site features has
the attribution. I'm not
I live in Crystal Palace, that's not far from where my brother and sister
in law live. I'll get onto it.
Tom
On 7 March 2013 23:35, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Anyone likely to be in the vicinity of Crystal Palace in the near future?
There's an area that could do with a
On 8 March 2013 18:03, Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.com wrote:
I left the area just before Tom moved in. I can pass on a bit of advice.
The problems are in The Central Hill Estate, an area with a high crime
level, so be a bit more cautious than normal if going for a walk around it.
Jerry,
As somebody who has used OSM-GB data quite a bit, and as a big fan of the
project, I agree with your suggestions below. Some comments on each...
On 23 February 2013 12:47, sk53.osm sk53@gmail.com wrote:
If OSM-GB is truly to allow the improvement of OSM data it needs to do a
few
On 10 January 2013 17:26, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
Shrewsbury is pronounced Shrew, a in the tiny animal, by locals.
Have just asked someone born there, his comment was its only pronounced
Shrowsbury by posh people who aren't from there, and those who go to
shrowsbury
I have been adding lots of landuse data in south east London as part of a
few projects (see recent posts tagged
http://tom.acrewoods.net/tag/openstreetmap/).
Adding farmland fields, hedges, fences and footpaths is really valuable.
The same goes for accurate landuse mapping in cities. I would
On 1 January 2013 16:10, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 01/01/13 11:15, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
I must admit I don't map land use if it is farmland. To me if it isn't
mapped it is farmland. It would seem a reasonable default.
+1
Smothering the countryside with landuse when it's
On 1 January 2013 18:39, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
As I said above (you must have missed it) marking fields within urban
areas is a good idea as you been doing. The contrast with the surroundings
is valuable and is not smothering thousands of square kilometres with
pointless
On 7 December 2012 14:10, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Just to say that I have added tagging and a relations for both of the
main road schemes mentioned specifically in the Autumn Statement.
Is there any actual benefit to doing this before construction
On Nov 29, 2012 11:57 AM, Jonathan Harley j...@spiffymap.net wrote:
On 28/11/12 20:46, Tom Chance wrote:
This points to the major flaw with importing this data - it changes year
to year, and we can't easily observe the changes on the ground. We might
spot development on green belt and so remove
On 28 November 2012 19:40, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Some of the area’s most certainly are not “protected” as they are actively
being discussed for development.
These are probably areas that have been de-designated, or are being
considered for this fate, since the Telegraph's
On Oct 31, 2012 6:14 PM, Brian Quinion openstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk
wrote:
On 31 October 2012 16:59, Kevin Peat k...@k3v.eu wrote:
On 31 October 2012 14:50, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
I think this is quite a confusing approach. Post code searches often
end up
returning
On 21 October 2012 23:13, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Personally, I'd say that if the process requires the duplication of
exactly the same value as is already in name that the process is flawed...
I think it can be useful because the article name isn't always just the OSM
On 17 October 2012 10:40, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Either way, I'm very much into adding
addressing information these days and I encourage more people to start
adding it.
+1
Yes indeed, being able to offer a database of addresses on buildings -
albeit probably with quite
On 3 October 2012 13:36, Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2 October 2012 13:46, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.comwrote:
If it's that good, perhaps it would be signposted enough to be an LCN? I
suspect it's too indirect to actually see much commuter/utility use.
I've been nosing around the brilliant OSM Inspector tool to check up on my
work with addresses, and I've come across some errors I don't understand or
can't fix.
The first issue is that the tool flags up endpoint_wrong_format, which
the wiki says means one or other of the numbers in the
On 25 September 2012 12:58, Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 25/09/2012 10:34, Tom Chance wrote:
The first issue is that the tool flags up endpoint_wrong_format, which
the wiki says means one or other of the numbers in the housenumber
aren't integers. But they are!
Here's
On 21 September 2012 12:51, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Tom, I’m guessing when you save from QGIS you are also reprojecting?
Oh yes, that too. Which in my case usually involves half an hour of faffing
around because I've forgotten how to force QGIS to do that, having already
mucked around
On 10 September 2012 22:07, David Fisher djfishe...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed that in my area (Croydon, S London) a lot of streets POIs
are identified by Nominatim with a nearby suburb of Croydon (Thornton
Heath) rather than with Croydon town itself. The Nominatim/geocoding guys
said
On 11 September 2012 14:22, David Fisher djfishe...@gmail.com wrote:
@Tom Chance: Interesting. In Southwark, wards are tagged as
boundary=administrative rather than boundary=political -- presumably
this is why Nominatim picks them up?
Oh, interesting, last time I looked there was an admin
On 28 August 2012 00:44, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
What I have in my mind is to grab each months data release from land
registry (thus building up a good database of address + postcode), and then
have some tool to visualise where we can match OSM addresses (without
On 21 August 2012 13:29, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Also, mass-retagging I frown upon. Why was this even done?!
Agreed. Frederick has already applied a block.
Out of interest, which part of the mechanical edit policy did this
contributor not comply with? As he notes in that forum
On 21 August 2012 14:40, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Out of interest, which part of the mechanical edit policy did this
contributor not comply with? As he notes in that forum thread, he
thought he had followed it to the letter.
Well the venue looks wrong to me to start with - he used
On 15 July 2012 10:46, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
I am trying to fix a routing problem, that I found whilst investigating
an error was reported in mapdust.
[...]
I am assuming it is more than a problem with OSRM. Otherwise I guess the
only option is just to re-survey, delete
On 11 July 2012 16:22, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
Has anyone from OSM approached Sustrans in the past?
There were some attempts in the past, e.g. this threat from 2008:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2008-June/006463.html
Has anyone made progress
On 28 June 2012 11:15, Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.ukwrote:
tl;dr: Please tag your local station(s) with platforms=n where n2
While we're on this subject... I am, after all these years, still a bit
confused about the best way to tag a train station where we have multiple
lines
On 28 June 2012 17:45, Jonathan Bennett openstreet...@jonno.cix.co.ukwrote:
On 28/06/2012 17:19, Tom Chance wrote:
According to Wikipedia's actual page on the station it has 8 platforms.
[citation needed]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preston_railway_station
Tom
--
http
On 18 June 2012 14:46, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Will the errors/discrepancies we identify be fed back to the DfT?
Unless Martin knows more than I do, then in all honesty I doubt it.
I'm hoping instead that whenever the DfT next want cycling data - say
2-3 years down the
On 18 June 2012 10:11, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Are there any notes I'm missing about how to access and deal with
nodes in the DfT data? e.g.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/edloach/7392860104/in/photostream
Did this get an answer? I've tried, and failed, to click on the underlying
DfT
On 18 June 2012 14:35, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2012 18:30, Tom Chance t...@acrewoods.net wrote:
It would be really helpful if the snapshot server could render a map
showing
where the remaining unmerged data is located.
That's a good idea, and it's something
Martin,
This looks like a great project.
Can you clarify the situation in London? I don't really know what areas the
SuperLondonBorough sets cover. I added some hints to the wiki as to where
each of them open, then went from the one that starts in Sydenham to pan up
to my neck of the woods and
On 4 June 2012 15:28, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
The nice folk at OpenPlaques have drawn my attention to the London
Mural Preservation Society's map:
http://londonmuralpreservationsociety.com/
which uses OSM, but with (presumably) their own data overlaid.
It occurs to
On 29 May 2012 15:44, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
My questions to the community:
1) Would a bulk upload of any or all of this data be interesting?
Thanks for raising this, it would be great to get a more complete set of
boundaries. In answer to your first question, no, please
On 29 May 2012 16:03, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Colin Smale wrote:
My questions to the community:
1) Would a bulk upload of any or all of this data be interesting?
I think uploading the files somewhere for people to use would certainly be
interesting, yes. You could
On 29 May 2012 17:19, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
They need to be manually entered as relations sharing nodes with those
features.
I would say that sharing nodes can lead to problems. Boundaries that get
imported or manually traced from OS data often have no visible reference on
On 29 May 2012 18:52, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
My question is: how do you know the boundary aligns with an existing
object?
Aha! A very good point.
I suppose in my case because I've been actively involved in canvassing for
a political party for years in the area, I know which
On 11 May 2012 11:59, Andrew Chadwick a.t.chadw...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/05/12 10:45, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
Sorry but I do have to say this. In an area (UK outside of Scotland)
where sadly, you're not free to roam where you like, access rights are
*absolutely vital detail* for walkers and
Is there a good way to tag flats within a building so that it is clear the
flat numbers (e.g. 1-12) correspond with the building and not with the
street? These are two examples I'm struggling with:
A block of flats, 1-12 Honor Oak Mansions, sits on Underhill Road. The
block doesn't have a number
On 3 May 2012 14:59, Derick Rethans o...@derickrethans.nl wrote:
I've done addr:flats=1-18 before which I saw was in use:
14:57 osmbot-test Derick: Tag addr:flats has 1468 values and appears
5220 times in the planet.
14:58 osmbot-test Derick: Tag addr:flatnumber has 68 values and appears
On 26 March 2012 14:29, Barry Cornelius barrycorneliu...@gmail.com wrote:
Although I'm only a lurker on openstreetmap and talk-gb, my understanding
is that the DfT did not do this and that whoever did add HS2 to OSM would
probably not want it deleted. If this is right, then maybe somebody who
On 9 March 2012 14:22, Mike Valiant mike_vali...@hotmail.com wrote:
On their website, if you select Bird's Eye view then the view stays the
same to maximum resolution. If however you select Aerial view it uses
images taken at a different time and then flips to the Bird's Eye view at
the
On 6 March 2012 15:48, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
(But I've not looked at really densely-mapped areas such as London, and the
situation may be more serious there.)
There are lots of patches of detail in London that are still at risk:
Righto, thank you.
Tom
On 20 January 2012 16:08, woll w...@2-islands.com wrote:
I meant if the tag and its value are the same as they were before
woll wrote
I think I'm correct in saying that the visualisation tools can't tell
that
you deleted a tag and recreated it, if the tag and
The Telegraph have used OSM for a map of some proposed new river crossings
in east London, not sure if it was in the paper as well.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/9009627/London-to-get-new-road-tunnel-under-River-Thames-within-decade-promises-Boris-Johnson.html
On 8 January 2012 13:49, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
I strongly recommend that first you look at your areas and contact
undecided mappers via the OpenStreetMap messaging system or directly if you
know them. Ask if they would not mind logging into their account and
accepting even
I've been looking at this handy map of objects that will (currently) be
lost on the license change:
http://cleanmap.poole.ch/?zoom=12lat=51.5032lon=-0.068
It appears as though we'll lose most of the tube stations, along with an
awful lot of fiddly little bits of detail in London, where the
On 4 January 2012 12:29, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
There are no genuinely anonymous edits. Our database has the user id and
email address for everyone who made such an edit. They have received the
license change emails (if their address is still valid), and they can log
in and
I used to occasionally use a bus service in the London Borough of Sutton
that did the same thing.
Tom
On 24 November 2011 10:27, Kev js1982 o...@kevswindells.eu wrote:
Preston bus (used?) to operate on a hail and ride basis - i.e. it would
stop anywhere on the estates to pick people up and
On 20 November 2011 22:51, Graham Jones grahamjones...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just added Craig's address lookup code to the BrewMap popups, along
with some changes I have made to the key and statistics bits.
Oh, this is a bit of a shame in my view. Now the map shows the address for
this
1 - 100 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
