Re: [Talk-se] Husnummerimport i Hbg kommun

(Ursäkta min svenska, har inte bott här så länge...) Jag tycker att vi skulle skapa en wiki-sida enligt http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines för att sammanfatta resultaten av diskussionen innan du börjar på riktigt. Frågorna i wikin hjälper också att fundera kring importen

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

There's been a lot of discussion on the license, however has anyone read the documentation on the import yet? Could the OSM Talk-CA provide any feedback on this, that way once the license is sorted out we can start immediately afterwards.

Re: [OSM-talk] RU Wikipedia now uses OSM by Wikidata ID

Dear Yuri, Could you, please, provide an example with the location outline? I tried Salzburg, New York, Odessa, Moscow, etc. in the Russian Wikipedia, but I got always just a marker on the map, but not an outline, i.e. a line indicating the outer contours or boundaries of an object or

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

On 1/22/2017 9:06 AM, James wrote: So if I understand correctly Paul, CC0 or any other license would require permission as a bypass to the license, even though it would be considered compatible with ODBL. No. CC0 is compatible with the ODbL, so you can just go ahead and use the data*,

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

On 1/22/2017 9:48 AM, James wrote: So why is this not considered the exact same as OGL-CA, which is considered compatible with ODBL? As mentioned previously, the OGL-CA is compatible because the Federal government has said so for their data. The Federal government's statement only applies

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

On 1/22/2017 7:07 AM, John Marshall wrote: Paul, So once we get a letter from the City of Ottawa, are we good to add the buildings as per the wiki? It depends what they say in their reply. If they say no, then we can't use their data. If we have a suitable reply, then we are able to legally

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

On 2017-01-22 12:48 PM, James wrote: > > So why is this not considered the exact same as OGL-CA, which is > considered compatible with ODBL? My understanding of why it's not the same: 1) The OGL-CA, due to a fault in its design, can only be used by the Canadian Federal Government. Contrast that

Re: [Talk-us] Choptank River

Thanks for the inspiration Simon. I spent some time today in JOSM improving the accuracy of the Choptank. Here's the finished relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/132#map=11/38.7592/-76.0542 Notes 1. Previous editors had created about 10 relations that were adjacent. I removed all

Re: [Talk-lt] Asociacija „Atvirasis žemėlapis“

O tarp kitko, visai nebloga mintis. 2017-01-21 21:42 GMT+02:00 Kęstutis Paulikas : > Įtariu galima daryt minimalų (arba ir neminimalų :) ) pavedimą per > banką ir pagal tai identifikuot. Bent jau mokant už Tele2 per Swedbanką > yra varna "perduoti asmens kodą

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] FANTOIR et métro parisien ?

D'ailleurs ça me fait penser qu'il y a aussi une toponymie souterraine, notamment dans les réseaux d'égouts. OK pas très visitable par le grand public (sauf certains secteurs). Souvent ce sont les noms des rues qui sont au dessus, mais pas toujours car les rues en surface ont pu bouger mais pas

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] FANTOIR et métro parisien ?

Le FANTOIR a des entrées diverses pour des lieux-dits associés à des stations de métro, des gares, des centres commerciaux, des hôpitaux, tout ce qui peut étant donné l'étendue ou l'importance locale aider à localiser un lieu et notamment les services qui s'y trouvent. Il n'y a donc pas que des

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] FANTOIR et métro parisien ?

Bonsoir, Le 22/01/2017 à 22:37, LeTopographeFou a écrit : A mes heures perdus j'essaie de forcer le rapprochement des données cadastres avec OSM via Osmose ou le site cadastre.openstreetmap.fr . Et il s'avère que certaines stations de métro parisiennes (pas

[OSM-talk-fr] FANTOIR et métro parisien ?

Bonjour, A mes heures perdus j'essaie de forcer le rapprochement des données cadastres avec OSM via Osmose ou le site cadastre.openstreetmap.fr . Et il s'avère que certaines stations de métro parisiennes (pas tous ?) ont un numéro FANTOIR et apparaissent

Re: [Talk-cz] Mapillary app

Moc díky, už pro oči nevidím:) Milan __ > Od: Marián Kyral > Komu: talk-cz@openstreetmap.org > Datum: 22.01.2017 20:35 > Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Mapillary app > >Dne 22.1.2017 v 17:45 Milan Cerny napsal(a): >> Ahoj,

Re: [Talk-es] Me presento

+1, un saludo,Ibai, bienvenido Santiago Higuera El dom, 22-01-2017 a las 19:39 +0100, Alejandro S. escribió: > Bienvenido, > > Cualquier duda que te surja, mira un poco por la wiki y si no lo > encuentras, pregunta sin miedo. > > Saludos, >   Alejandro Suárez > > 2017-01-22 18:09 GMT+01:00

Re: [Talk-cz] Mapillary app

Dne 22.1.2017 v 17:45 Milan Cerny napsal(a): > Ahoj, nemáte prosím někdo starší verzi aplikace Mapillary pro Android, > případně kde se nechá stáhnout? > Po aktualizaci mi v aplikaci nejde vypnout zvuk spouště, moc dlouho se to > cvakání za jízdy poslouchat nedá. Nepomáhá ani nastavení do

Re: [Talk-es] Me presento

Saludos Ibai desde Catalunya, te animo a que también participes en los grupos de Telegram, dónde podrás hablar con nosotros "en directo". En la montaña queda mucho curro por hacer así que tu ayuda será muy bienvenida, y tu buena disposición a proceder en procedimientos que no abarquen "tu zona de

Re: [Talk-es] Me presento

Bienvenido, Cualquier duda que te surja, mira un poco por la wiki y si no lo encuentras, pregunta sin miedo. Saludos, Alejandro Suárez 2017-01-22 18:09 GMT+01:00 Ibai Gurrutxaga : > Hola. > > Llevo una temporada interesado en OSM: aprendiendo, haciendo pequeños >

Re: [Talk-de] Gelöschte Objekte visuell wiederfinden

On 20.01.2017 14:43, Tobias Preuss wrote: > OSM Deep History (leider offline) > http://iandees.github.io/osm-deep-history/ hier online: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] I think I got this right...

On Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Paul Johnson wrote > It would be easier to verify by using forward in the child relations > exclusively.  Then it will validate as a loop, or it won't, > and the gap becomes immediately apparent.  As tagged, most tools (JOSM > included) won't "get" it.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Signalement Osmose étrange

J'ai vu qu'Osmose met l'erreur dans la catégorie "Tags à retirer / layer incorrect" En général quand je met "covered= yes" dans des cas similaires, je ne met pas de layer. C'est ce qui est indiqué par le wiki "Ways passing /through/ buildings should normally have the same (or none) layer as

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

If someone actually read the introduction, it is saying exactly what Steve is saying: replacing governing bodies. This licence is based on version 2.0 of the Open Government Licence – Canada, which was developed through public consultation. The only substantive changes in this licence are to

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

On Sat, 21 Jan 2017, Paul Norman wrote: On 1/20/2017 6:00 PM, James wrote: Is OGL-CA not compatible with osm? The license isn't OGL-CA. OGL-CA is the license from the Federal government, while the City of Ottawa uses the ODL. In the case of OGL-CA data it's compatible because they gave a

[Talk-es] Me presento

Hola. Llevo una temporada interesado en OSM: aprendiendo, haciendo pequeños cambios, leyendo la lista... Soy informático, estoy muy interesado en el movimiento del software/conocimiento libre y siempre me han gustado los mapas (sobre todo los de montaña). Como no podía ser de otra forma, con

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

What I don't understand is even if there was the most open license possible, you are requiring to get an authorisation to use the data...So what's the point of having a legal group or dealing with licensing as if a restrictive copyrighted dataset that sues anyone who uses the data, if we have

[Talk-GB] Request: T-con facility

Hi all, For the first meeting of the OSM UK Company we would like to use a telephone conference facility. This prevents any delays caused by people having to download software/update plug-ins/restart dodgy internet connections. It also means that conversation is in one place rather than 2 (e.g.

[Talk-cz] Mapillary app

Ahoj, nemáte prosím někdo starší verzi aplikace Mapillary pro Android, případně kde se nechá stáhnout? Po aktualizaci mi v aplikaci nejde vypnout zvuk spouště, moc dlouho se to cvakání za jízdy poslouchat nedá. Nepomáhá ani nastavení do tichého režimu. Moc díky. Milan

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Centrales électriques

Le 21 janvier 2017 à 23:34, François Lacombe a écrit : > Bonjour Jérôme, > > Merci pour cette mise en valeur, c'est très réussi (ne serait-ce que pour > débusquer les manques dans la base) ! > > Lorsqu'on a yes sur plant:output:electricity, c'est que la valeur est >

semanárioOSM Nº 339 10/01/2017-16/01/2017

Bom dia, O semanárioOSM Nº 339, o resumo de tudo o que acontece no mundo OpenStreetMap, está publicado em português: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/pb/archives/8619/ Aproveite! semanarioOSM? Quem?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Onde?:

semanárioOSM Nº 339 10/01/2017-16/01/2017

Bom dia, O semanárioOSM Nº 339, o resumo de tudo o que acontece no mundo OpenStreetMap, está publicado em português: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/pb/archives/8619/ Aproveite! semanarioOSM? Quem?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Onde?:

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

Paul, So once we get a letter from the City of Ottawa, are we good to add the buildings as per the wiki? John On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:41 AM, john whelan wrote: > There is another way forward for Stats at the moment and that would be to > use the Statistics Canada

Re: [Talk-se] Husnummerimport i Hbg kommun

Svårt att veta var en villa har sin entré. Dessutom är det hela huset som har adressen, inte bara entrén, till skillnad från med trapphus där adresserna normalt sätts på entréer. Radhus mappas normalt som separata byggnader. Wikin beskriver olika metoder där alla är lika accepterade:

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing with Statistics Canada

I agree with Bernie. The intent of the City of Ottawa was for this data to be added to OSM. John Marshall Ottawa On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Bernie Connors wrote: > Stewart, > > Governments are writing open data policies, creating open data > portals, and

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing with Statistics Canada

Stewart,       Governments are writing open data policies, creating open data portals, and adopting the OGL-CA Licence because they want their data to be used. There are many benefits for governments to do this. It makes them appear more transparent, it supports citizens, businesses  and

Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL and source tags

Am 22.01.2017 um 13:38 schrieb David Marchal: > ... > I’m studying asking authorization for data import to a potential provider, > and have a question about the ODbL: does it mandate the preservation of > source tags, or at least including their content in the re-using DB > disclaimer? The

Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada

There is another way forward for Stats at the moment and that would be to use the Statistics Canada address file which is available on the Federal Government Open Data portal under the Federal Government Open Data licence. The addresses are nodes rather than building outlines but there is nothing

Re: [Talk-ca] Talk-ca Digest, Vol 107, Issue 17

Stewart, thank you for providing more details. What exactly in Ottawa's new open Data license (it recently was updated) is a problem for OSM? Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 22, 2017, at 7:00 AM, talk-ca-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote: > > Send Talk-ca mailing list submissions to >

Re: [Talk-se] Husnummerimport i Hbg kommun

Jag ser det som ett suboptimalt sätt att tagga. Det är ett inkonsekvent sätt då det inte finns ett ett-till-ett förhållande mellan byggnader och adresser. En byggnad kan ha flera adresser eller ingen. Det leder som sagt också till tvetydigheter, som exemplet med source-taggen. Det bästa sätten

Re: [OSM-talk] Destructive new 'contributor'

You could put a note on the map in New Orleans saying what you think needs checking locally. -- Andrew From: Dave F Sent: 22 January 2017 10:50:19 To: OSM Talk Subject: [OSM-talk] Destructive new 'contributor' Hi Some one from

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery CC-BY-NC 4.0 + OSM Specific allowance

Am 21.01.2017 um 22:42 schrieb Tobias Wendorff: > ... > Is it enough to get a permission to distribute it under ODbL? Wouldn't > it also be needed to have a permission for DbCL? The DbCL states that > the stored components don't have a foreign copyright. So contracts, which > tell us "you can

[OSM-talk] ODbL and source tags

Hello, there. I’m studying asking authorization for data import to a potential provider, and have a question about the ODbL: does it mandate the preservation of source tags, or at least including their content in the re-using DB disclaimer? The potential data provider could be more easily

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Itinéraires et balisages FFRP et Club Vosgien

> Le 22 janv. 2017 à 13:06, sly (sylvain letuffe) a écrit : > > Puis-je suggérer le wiki.openstreetmap.org ? cela permettra à plus de monde > à mon avis d'y participer (pas besoin de compte github qui fait d'ailleurs > un peu "tech") pour ceux ayant déjà un compte sur le

Re: [Talk-us] I think I got this right...

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 6:11 PM, wrote: > Regarding the use of child relations for routes, and what to do about > directional roles on beltways, I made some mapping changes to a beltway > that happens to be local to me. > > > > I took the relation for I-435[1] and

[Talk-it] Mappiamo le strade d'Abruzzo

Vista la situazione, riprendo dall'altro thread il suggerimento dato. Il task manager è sempre attivo, qui il link diretto: http://osmit-tm.wmflabs.org/project/8 Saluti Fabrizio ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Itinéraires et balisages FFRP et Club Vosgien

David Marchal wrote > Afin de ne pas faire les choses dans mon coin, je pensais faire un > brouillon de courrier que je publierai sur Github, afin de vous permettre > à tous d’y proposer des modifications, Puis-je suggérer le wiki.openstreetmap.org ? cela permettra à plus de monde à mon avis d'y

Re: [Talk-it] Mappa centri accoglienza terremoto l'Aquila

Il giorno 21 gennaio 2017 17:33, Matteo Fortini ha scritto: > La lista che abbiamo usato è qui, è stata geotaggata a mano da persone del > posto, io ho mappato nei dintorni dei luoghi per non lasciarli nel nulla, > ma tutto potrebbe essere migliorato parecchio > >

Re: [OSM-talk] Destructive new 'contributor'

On 22/01/17 10:50, Dave F wrote: Hi Some one from China has made some meaningless & erroneous edit in Bristol, UK which I've reverted, For completeness, that was https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45364788 Unfortunately your comments there weren't really actionable - they don't

[OSM-talk] Destructive new 'contributor'

Hi Some one from China has made some meaningless & erroneous edit in Bristol, UK which I've reverted, but there's one in New Orleans which someone with local knowledge needs to look at. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45365148#map=11/29.9244/-90.2323 Is there someone here who can

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 90 --> 70 km/h

Dat ziet er inderdaad goed uit, als query. Ik wist zelfs niet dat het mogelijk was om meerdere criteria mee te geven. Ik ging er altijd van uit dat dat enkel werkte op name en name:xy. Jo Op 22 januari 2017 om 10:53 schreef Jakka : > Op 21/01/2017 om 9:04 schreef Jakka: >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 90 --> 70 km/h

Op 21/01/2017 om 9:04 schreef Jakka: Hoi Ruben, overpass Query is nog niet mijn ding Wat kan ik aanpassen om bijvoorbeeld alleen het arrondissement Kortrijk West-Vlaanderen op te vragen (server time saving). Gans Vlaanderen heb ik voorlopig niet nodig ;) Vermoed dat met de assistent niet

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Cartographie des églises

building=* décrit le type architectural de bâtiment et pas son usage, même si il est souvent identique à l'usage initial (la raison pour laquelle le bâtiment a été construit). Même une église transformée en autre chose (il y en a) reste finalement un building=church. A l'inverse un hangar

Re: [Talk-se] Husnummerimport i Hbg kommun

Hej Kollade på de första förändringarna som gjorts och en sak som jag noterade och som jag tycker inte är helt optimal är att du överladdar addr:* taggar och building=* på samma objekt, t.ex.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411646429 Det vore bättre om de hade varsin eget objekt, en nod för

Re: [Talk-se] Busslinjer - 3 changesets i Västerås, vad har jag missat?

Perfekt. Tackar för tipset om ÖPNVkarte. Det står att datan ska laddas över inom några minuter men får se senare i veckan om det fungerar eller, än så länge har mina nya rutter inte laddats in till kartan. Kanske ska se över möjligheten att generera öpnvkarte liknande tiles själv lokalt. --

hebdoOSM Nº 339 10/01/2017-16/01/2017

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 339 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître en français. Un condensé à retrouver à: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/8619/ Bonne lecture! hebdoOSM? Qui?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où?:

hebdoOSM Nº 339 10/01/2017-16/01/2017

Bonjour, Le résumé hebdomadaire n° 339 de l'actualité OpenStreetMap vient de paraître en français. Un condensé à retrouver à: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/8619/ Bonne lecture! hebdoOSM? Qui?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages Où?: