On 26/03/11 04:03, Samuel Dyck wrote:
Let me clarify, will the so called tainted data still be up for the near
future, or will I be spending my week preforming hectic Canvec imports
to save street names I gathered with a pen and paper? It doesn't look
good for me
Purposly delaying the inevetable... so i'll no longer be editing ...
so all my edits should be considered 'spam' so then others can removed
it.
or I can accept the agreement and go and start removing all of my
edits since i started. all edits that i have touched at any
stage of edits
But per
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Updates/2011-03-07#ODbL_phase_3_delayed_due_to_Creative_Commons,
phase 3 has been delayed. Or has this changed?
Sam
On 11-03-26 05:18 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 26/03/11 04:03, Samuel Dyck wrote:
Let me clarify, will the so called tainted
On 26/03/11 16:12, Samuel Dyck wrote:
But per
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Updates/2011-03-07#ODbL_phase_3_delayed_due_to_Creative_Commons,
phase 3 has been delayed. Or has this changed?
Those community updates are exactly that - written by a member of the
community and not
So there is poor communication between the board and the community? I
hate to argue, but the License change still has a large TODO notice next
to the No option. This is a problem.
Sam
On 11-03-26 11:17 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 26/03/11 16:12, Samuel Dyck wrote:
But per
On 26/03/11 16:33, Samuel Dyck wrote:
So there is poor communication between the board and the community? I
hate to argue, but the License change still has a large TODO notice next
to the No option. This is a problem.
As I thought I had explained that community update was not a
communication
*Decline*. You do not agree to the new OpenStreetMap Contributor Terms
and, specifically, you refuse to re-license your existing contributions
for use under the ODbL. (TODO: add more on what this means). Here.
On 26/03/11 16:42, Samuel Dyck wrote:
*Decline*. You do not agree to the new OpenStreetMap Contributor Terms
and, specifically, you refuse to re-license your existing contributions
for use under the ODbL. (TODO: add more on what this means). Here.
I see, my bad. I'm just a little frustrated about the lack of
communication. I should say that I have already accepted the new terms
(sorry Sam).
On 11-03-26 11:48 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 26/03/11 16:42, Samuel Dyck wrote:
*Decline*. You do not agree to the new OpenStreetMap Contributor
Dear Sam,
Well, Sam (Vekemans) you are a man of your word. You mean what you say.
Don't you?
On 25 August 2010, you said, All my contributions to OpenStreetMap
are released into the public domain... I grant anyone the right to use
my contributions for any purpose [1]
You mean that don't you?
I guess the OpenStreetMap Foundation's Map (odbl only) has not yet
been started. Since the date of step 5 is 'to be determined'.
So that's a good reason why i'm actively working on the alternative(s) :-)
...
To get back on topic, I'll get back to this list once i have the
rules.txt/.pl script and
Thanks Sam. Now hopefully no one on the other boards will rip into me
for daring to import. :) You might also want to look at the MLI
provincial forest data and the other goodies on the admin. boundaries
list. (I don't know what you are interested in). Sadly with the
exception of the Winnipeg
Lol, that page is no longer valid. ... nor is accepting terms which
keep in changing. ... and the Board has the power to unplug osm at any
moment ... as well as ban list-serv users ... on any mailing list. :)
Creating a new map, and a new wiki, where the Foundation controled all
large edits
Re: On 25 August 2010, Sam Vekemans said on his wiki user page, All
my contributions to OpenStreetMap are released into the public
domain... I grant anyone the right to use
my contributions for any purpose [1]
[1]
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Sam Vekemans
acrosscanadatra...@gmail.comwrote:
Lol, that page is no longer valid.
Well, the statement on it seems pretty unequivocal -- [PD data release ...]
I grant anyone the right to use my contributions *for any purpose*, without
any conditions, unless
...@osmfoundation.org; board Board; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Importing MLI park boundaries
Re: On 25 August 2010, Sam Vekemans said on his wiki user page, All my
contributions to OpenStreetMap are released into the public domain... I
grant anyone the right to use my contributions
Hi Everyone
The Canvec data for MB provincial park boundaries is horribly inaccurate
and this bothers me greatly. The government of Manitoba offers good
boundary data and a bunch of other cool stuff though the Manitoba Lands
Initiative, which I believe we can use, but I've never converted
Assuming the dataset clears legal, my preferred way of converting
shapefiles to osm is using ogr2osm
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ogr2osm]. You get to write your
own tag filters in Python (two samples are provided in the
translations directory), as long as you're not doing any complicated
using VirtualBox and Ubuntu to run it.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Dyck [mailto:samueld...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 12:12 PM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] Importing MLI park boundaries
Hi Everyone
The Canvec data for MB provincial park
it.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Dyck [mailto:samueld...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 12:12 PM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] Importing MLI park boundaries
Hi Everyone
The Canvec data for MB provincial park boundaries is horribly inaccurate
and this bothers me
Hi,
The National Parks data will be removed from the osm api next friday,
as it will be considered 'tainted data' since the person who uploaded
the data doesn't agree to the new contributor terms.
This helps, as it makes it easier to add in the Manitoba parks data.
Since knowone volunteered, the
Thanks Sam, that saves me a lot of work. Is all the tainted data
being removed Friday, or just yours?
Sam
On 11-03-25 10:29 PM, Sam Vekemans wrote:
Hi,
The National Parks data will be removed from the osm api next friday,
as it will be considered 'tainted data' since the person who uploaded
That is upto the OpenStreetMap Foundation to decide on what todo, as
they will effectivelly 'own' all the rights to the data, including all
tainted data.
We (as a community) do not have a say in this matter, unfortunatly.
cc'd the lists,
it's up to them to reply back.
cheers,
sam
On 3/25/11,
Let me clarify, will the so called tainted data still be up for the near
future, or will I be spending my week preforming hectic Canvec imports
to save street names I gathered with a pen and paper? It doesn't look
good for me
using VirtualBox and Ubuntu to
run it.
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Dyck [mailto:samueld...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 12:12 PM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] Importing MLI park boundaries
Hi Everyone
The Canvec data for MB provincial park
25 matches
Mail list logo
