ot; georeferenced map, but to what end I can't fathom.
>
> cheers,
>
> Martin.
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
How do you reply to an email that wasn't sent to your inbox and still keep the
thread structure?
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
map of OSM,
although you can display this NLS imagery over google maps, or leaflet, or
"google maps API".
Don't know what the "holes map" which you linked was however. It doesn't show
house numbers but seems to have more coverage.
________
Ok, it seems like this one didn't show up under the right thread. I moved the
talk-gb@openstreetmap.org to the CC section and emailed m...@good-stuff.co.uk
directly, but it didn't show up under that thread. The way I originally did it
is by clicking on the email in the archive, whi
o, change, particularly when streets are renamed or
rebuilt. So you can't be 100% certain that a house number in the 1950s is the
same number it is now, even if the building is still the same.
Mark
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
e
person were to reply twice to my email, and then I replied to one of their
emails, how would the archiving system know which email I replied to?
30 Oct 2020, 18:37 by matkoni...@tutanota.com:
>
>
>
> Oct 30, 2020, 16:28 by > talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> :
>
>>
73&lon=-5.29584&layers=170&b=1
--
Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox:
https://tutanota.com
30 Oct 2020, 15:47 by davefoxfa...@btinternet.com:
>
>
> On 30/10/2020 15:28, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> It has come to
Oct 30, 2020, 16:28 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
> It has come to my attention that the "Town Plan" map from 1944-1967 in NLS is
> available freely.
>
What are its licensing terms?
"available freely" does not mean
On 30/10/2020 15:28, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote:
Hello,
It has come to my attention that the "Town Plan" map from 1944-1967 in
NLS is available freely.
Link to this on NLS?
DaveF
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1341723829#map=13/51.5507/0.0030
[5]:
https://www.ed.ac.uk/history-classics-archaeology/research/research-projects/mapping-edinburgh-s-social-history
[6]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/55.9821/-3.2444
___________
Talk-GB mai
ve to WGS84, but this is a lot better than 5m.
If there is consensus, then the wiki needs to be updated to recommend the
OSTN15 transformation.
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
• use the Welsh name and English name together separated by a hyphen
(which is the practice in some other countries)
I’m going to refer you to
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2017-August/020478.html where
I made my argument against this (tl;dr - its ugly, confusing and there are
ferencing GB to ETRS.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
nk building, be mapped as a single
> polygon? Or should they be mapped as three adjacent, but separate, polygons?
> Is there a standard way of approaching situations like this?
>
> Mark
>
> _______
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openst
in the
>> Basque country this seemingly reflects the official state policy of
>> designating the official name of a town as its two names delimited by a
>> hyphen. We believe in the Wales context this would be better achieved by
>> processing name:en and name:cy tags.
>>
>&
We're really happy to get some feedback, questions or comments on this
> proposal. Especially highlighting things we might have missed or misconstrued.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ben
> --
> Mapio Cymru <https://mapio.cymru/>
> OpenStreetMap.Cymru <http://OpenStreetMap.Cymru>
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
3 paź 2020, 18:16 od talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
> On 03/10/2020 16:57, Philip Barnes wrote:
>
>> They are intended to stop this type of routing
>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=52.64994%2C-1.20491%3B52.64983%2C-1.2049
>>
ps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3403352
DaveF
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
less the start or end point is on the flare why would a
router do that over the shorter route on the roundabout... I mean
maybe there are a few cases where the flare is shorter somehow?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Tal
inst anybody turning off which should exclude it from
any consideration by a router?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
no explicit
signed restrictions. I suspect this is "rendering for routers". Do
routers actually need this data? I'm tempted just to delete them all
wherever I meet them, but I suspect there are thousands of them and
there'll be howls of complaint.
Regards
Brian
___
subscriber access to a maximum of five simultaneous VRS streams and
included access to a two-way satellite link, for areas where there was no
mobile phone signal.
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
non-note tags and values that are used for this that I'm missing?
Best Regards,
Andy
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___________
Tal
ff-shoot do?
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
28 wrz 2020, 13:53 od talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
>
>
> On 28/09/2020 10:00, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> The change you plan to execute is of limited use. Yes, it ensures more
>> conformity in the data, but it will be a temporary fix (since new
>> "wrong" URLs c
nes on each you'll see it
displays them for each URL (tested on Firefox latest)
DaveF
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
and advises on how to proceed from here
Thanks in advance!
--
Rodrigo Díez Villamuera
w: http://rodrigodiez.io
t: @rodrigodiez_pro
p: 00 44 7513 638225
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
ally a solution, the question needs
to be asked is this data still valid and rather than a mechanical fix
these entries need to be visited and checked.
Two, separate endeavours.
DaveF
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.op
t to the requests to join OSMF & sit through long,
tedious committee meetings.
Again, we contribute to OSM in the way which best suits us.
Remember: OSM is not an IT project.
Tell that to the organisers/speakers at State of the Maps
DaveF
___
Ta
*From:* Philip Barnes
*Sent:* 27 September 2020 18:49
*To:* talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-GB] Hello world and automated change proposal:
Add missing URL scheme on UK's Pubs websites
On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 16:28 +0100, Rodrigo Díez Villamuera wrote:
Hi all,
First of al
er they will
sell to me.
Cheers, Phil.
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I encountered https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/4140
and it is hard to me how it should be decided.
Do you have some clear preference?
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Thanks! I forgot that en-GB can also be translated, so
translation mistakaes may become cause of a problem.
Thanks for a fixing it!
Sep 16, 2020, 13:51 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
> Hopefully I've fixed them on TW for the next update.
>
> Tom
>
> On 16/09/2020 12:44, To
Hopefully I've fixed them on TW for the next update.
Tom
On 16/09/2020 12:44, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
That would be because somebody on TranslateWiki has added a bunch
of bogus strings to the en-GB translation:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/c
ion, by viewing the
screenshot here: http://pberry.me.uk/osm/osm_query.png
I've double-checked on other devices, operating systems, and browsers
but the issue remains. I hope this helps to narrow down the problem.
Regards,
/Paul/
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 at 11:04, Nick via Tal
y <mailto:pmberry2...@gmail.com>; Talk GB
<mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org>
*Subject: *Re: [Talk-GB] Overpass query strangeness within iD
1) it is not a bug of default style at all - what is displayed in
tiles is not related
(both are using OSM data and here similarities end)
2) it is not
ation section, so it is possibly a
> recently introduced bug.
>
>
>
>
>
> Gareth
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: > Paul Berry <mailto:pmberry2...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: > 16 September 2020 00:21
> > To: > Talk GB <mailto:talk-gb@open
glish one: Търговска Сграда, which translates as "commercial
> building" - there might be other cosmetic bugs out there.
>
> Regards,
> Paul
>
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
s all great.
Just wondering if anyone has had contact with them?
https://www.ramblers.org.uk/get-involved/out-there/out-there-getting-paths-on-maps/mapping-scotland-paths.aspx
Cheers
Chris
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
nto
the harbour:
https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0278/1529/products/OCB-1179.jpg
Mark
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
______
3 wrz 2020, 11:58 od o...@live.co.uk:
> Would access=permissive or access:bicycle=permissive be sensible? Or is that
> also mangling tagging conventions. I genuinely don’t know!
>
It would be bicycle tag, not access:bicycle_______
Talk-GB mai
.org.uk
[...]
It also appears to be tagging for the renderer, as changing
cycleway->footway changes the path in OpenCycleMap from a blue dashed
line to a red dashed line.
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetma
hway-code
BCC to DWG because of the impact in cycle routing.
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
I already answered your last point.
Good to see the give way is against the motor vehicles.
On 02/09/2020 22:37, Lester Caine wrote:
On 02/09/2020 19:00, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
I don't know the area. but they look like the existing posts to me.
Has the cycle path been realigned around
On 02/09/2020 18:27, Lester Caine wrote:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-53999106
One does wonder about the competence of builders at times?
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
sing in the Wikipedia article on the NCN). I suspect someone
> worked out a proposed route that was never approved, but it got into OSM
> anyway.
>
>
> What should I/we do? E.g.
> * Mark 231 and 235 as "Proposed"?
> * Delete both relations? How can this
https://campfire.trekview.org/t/new-forest-pano-party-rescheduled-sunday-13th-september/325
for more details, or email myself or David at dgreemw...@trekview.org
for more details.
Thanks,
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
here dataset was used
> to inform surveys.
>
>
> Cj
>
> [1] https://osm.mathmos.net/defib/
> [2] https://osm.mathmos.net/defib/progress/NE/
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstre
p out data that HMRC have
published to aid with mapping efforts?
https://github.com/hmrc/eat-out-to-help-out-establishments
Prior to this, there was a scraper that collated the data:
https://github.com/svenlatham/eatout-scraper
Thank you,
*Rob*
_______
Talk-
rnment releases
aerial images with alignment better than
GPS traces from smartphones and
comparable with GPS traces from
dedicated receivers (such as Garmin
etrex)_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
al roads/buildings to align without considering the
> bigger picture.
>
> The only solution I can think of is to move all nodes in the area I've
> worked on to match the new Bing (ie a mass edit). Any other
> suggestions?
>
> Stephen
>
>
>
>
>
ven have
stance "we are against all imports"
>
> In sparsely mapped regions even relatively coarse data might be an
> improvement. In areas where individual gas lamps have been accurately placed
> higher precision would be required to avoid misleading entries.
+1__
uch an attempt!
>
+1
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Aug 14, 2020, 15:53 by for...@david-woolley.me.uk:
> On 14/08/2020 12:46, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>> If signage on the ground is gone or never existed then route relation should
>> not be mapped in OSM*.
>>
>
> In the long term, this could make OS
>>
> An interesting conundrum. I’m thinking about mapping and navigation in
> London at the moment (see blogs at
> https://www.lcc.org.uk/articles/finding-your-way-on-londons-cycle-infrastructure-1
> https://www.lcc.org.uk/articles/signage-and-wayfinding
>
>
> So my underst
for him to update as and when it gets
re-stickered.
Ed
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 13/08/2020 15:41, Simon Still wrote:
So my understanding is that OSM normally only maps what’s actually on
the ground rather than what might be shown on a map (and there was
some discussion recently about this -
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-gb@openstreetmap.org/msg19303.html)
This
name.
Experimentally I have added this
<https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836343813> toid to a street in Glossop.
Jerry
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listin
e? Twitter? A thread on Loomio? Here?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Jez
>> >
>>
>> Some of the COVID-19 related highway changes, e.g. modal filters
>> implemented with planters might be worth including. There's an obvious
>
of
ways to achieve that.
Though I suspect that rendering map (raster tiles with Mapnik, client-side
rendered vector tiles,
rendering on client side from raw OSM data etc) will be better than fetching
raster tiles and modifying
them
___________
Talk-
e railway tracks,
> which can't?
>
> Many thanks for any help/ideas/suggestions.
>
> cheers,
>
> Martin.
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/ta
Jul 24, 2020, 12:46 by r...@hubris.org.uk:
> On 23/07/2020 10:55, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jul 23, 2020, 11:49 by for...@david-woolley.me.uk:
>>
>> On 23/07/2020 10:12, Nick wrote:
>>
>> Do we actually
real collaboration between OSM 'volunteers', OS
> and other agencies strikes me as a possible win-win?..
>
>
Yes, though topic is quite tricky due to legal issues and due to different
priorities/approaches.
> but I suppose that is me going 'a step
general public is going to be fairly rare,
though still
happening, like with nearly all resources.
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ngland GIS Data.
>
> 17. A person who is not a party to this licence shall not have any right
> under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 to enforce any of
> its terms.
>
> 18. This licence (including any non-contractual disputes) is governed
> by, and wi
to e.g. for Planning applications?
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Nick
>
> On 22/07/2020 13:20, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jul 20, 2020, 12:29 by >> n...@foresters.org>> :
>>
>>> Dear all
>>>
&g
g lanes for https://github.com/dabreegster/abstreet
and in rural areas I tend to map hiking routes rather than buildings.
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ulk import; there are duplicate entries, incorrect
coordinates and incorrect or missing addresses.
Can you post the link?
DaveF
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
...@gmail.com:
> My Council has introduced 200+ lamp post mounted charging points >
> https://www.instagram.com/p/B_Fm7L8nOL8/
>
> Would you give that its own node? or as part of > Tag:highway=street_lamp?
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:13 PM Dave F via Talk-GB <>
ivalent of saying drivers needs to know if a car park is
full or a commuter wants to find out if the 08:12 to Oxford has been
cancelled.
DaveF
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
, but it seems a bit pointless if they're not generally mapped.
Mark
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Ta
>>P.P.S If anyone
wants to start a page for USRN, please feel free to, otherwise I will attempt
this later in the week.
>>Best regards,
>>Rob
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
______
eate them, right?
K
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
)
+1 for "segregated" referring to separate (or not) pedestrian and cycle lanes
in a shared cycleway
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
i.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_2020_Q3_Project:_Cycling_Infrastructure
>
>
>
>
>
> Another topical one with cycling having increased take up as people have
> avoided public transport or took advantage of the (for a while) quieter roads.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
&g
imagery
>> > is great, I don't know if it was part of this update, or if it's been
>> > like this for a while.
>> >
>> >
>> > ___
>> > Talk-GB mailing list
>> > Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
>> > https://list
arter - it is a completely valid
suggestion in for example Poland.
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
p slowly. There are
major changes.
My Ubuntu bionic (due for upgrade to Focal shortly) claims to have a current
GDAL - using an ubuntigis unstable repo, but that's behind as well - I'm on
GDAL 3.04 while upstream is 3.11.
Paul Bivand
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
or
less stable
- for example roads are far less likely to be moved/renamed than bus lines.
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
n (a friend has
done some preliminary work) or similar. This is not elegant but is perhaps a
first step in enabling a whole lot of development?
Cheers
Nick
On 02/07/2020 18:38, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:
Hi Robert,
Many thanks for producing that map.
I was able to look a
iscuss things further. Best wishes,
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
https://osm.mathmos.net/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
That is an unrelated failure that caused tile of
the default map style to stop updating
(other servers relying on the same toolchain also
were likely to be affected)
Jun 28, 2020, 21:08 by danstowell+...@gmail.com:
> I won't presume that everyone on talk-gb wants the gory technical
&
he only one seeing this: do I need to investigate further?
>
> ael
>
>
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mailing list
> Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
on my machine.
>
> Regards
>
> Tony Shield
>
> TonyS999
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
bugs they found and/or
comment on the user experience.
Just throw me a line at o...@poppe.dev and I'll send you the download link.
Thanks in advance!
Kai
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstree
Jun 21, 2020, 03:54 by talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:
>
>
>
> Jun 21, 2020, 01:28 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net:
>
>> We think in particular that a significant part of the cycle parking data
>> (generally the residential areas, where there is little parking p
21 Jun 2020, 12:07 by p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
> On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 08:42 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jun 21, 2020, 01:21 by list-osm-talk...@cyclestreets.net:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Ric
d side.
>
https://bikedata.cyclestreets.net/tflcid2osm:type=crossings_junctions/#14.77/51.50656/-0.08864
is missing bicycle=yes foot=no intentional? See say
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24923378 (RWG082685)
that seems impassable for pedestrians
https://api.cyclestreets.net/v2/infrastruct
d and link them
with image tag?
Or maybe - upload images to Wikimedia Commons and link them with
wikimedia_commons?
It would make easier to verify what went wrong in case of manual verification.
Is there a plan which tags would be used by changeset itself?
___________
nd instead of
bicycle_parking=locked
note=Own lock
use
access=private
(id RWG102738)
I remember big import preparations that had issue tracker about tag conversion
- is it this project?
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
0/Proposal/Potlatch_2_for_desktop
> Where is best to raise this, if not here?
>
It was possible to comment on and support microgrant proposals but deadline for
that ended.
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
nd in volume (both in London
> and internationally - though London, due to the fragmented local authorities
> seems to be doing it in far more varied ways than other places) there is a
> benefit to establishing this now
>
>
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ke. So frozen_food sounds a bit too
>limited.
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
.
Regards, Phil.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
upermarket. See Sainsbury's with a Lloyds Pharmacy inside it
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6868601075 Tesco with a Tesco pharmacy
inside https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6841571554
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lis
that was primary reason for creating it).
___________
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
> If you save the living environment, the biodiversity that we have left,
> you will also automatically save the physical environment, too. But If
> you only save the physical environment, you will ultimately lose both.
>
> 1) Don’t drive species to extinction
>
> 2) Don’t destroy a habitat that species rely on.
>
> 3) Don’t change the climate in ways that will result in the above.
>
> }<(((*>
>
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
y/bridleway, abandonded:highway=footway or
removed:highway=footway, depending on whether the path is still visible and
whether the blockage would be relatively easy or difficult to remove. This
seems to me to be much better than highway=no.
Regards,
Mike
_____
; are not used because city centres are typically a mixrure of all three.
>
> What I'm trying to achieve is a 'built-up-area' rendering which covers the
> whole of the built up area of a town or city. Not looking for
> administrative boundaries - but the actu
may be ... I am happy to spend a while trying this" as "I'm doing it NOW".
Best Regards,
Andy
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
101 - 200 of 449 matches
Mail list logo
