On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:18:58AM +, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Downloading map:
http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~ojw/bbox/?
W=18.675668S=45.528375E=18.739928N=45.573375width=600height=600
Traceback (most recent call last):
File video.py, line 545, in module
Valent Turkovic kaže:
Svoj guide za fedoru sam radio prema ubuntu vodicu koji sam linkao u blog
postu.
U blogu imaš dva linka, jedan do uređaja a drugi do igotu projekta. Da
li ja nešto ne vidim ili si ti pogriješio?
--
Tomislav Parčina
ime.prez...@gmail.com
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:29 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
While it's a noble pursuit to help a specific demographic I think it's
important not to exclude others in the process, most areas I've lived
in in the last 12 months have no NearMap coverage, there is some
coverage
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
That's Liz's dept,
B*gg*
I've lost the thread of this argument
what am i supposed to be doing next?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Friday 18 Dec 2009 1:54:54 pm Liz wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
That's Liz's dept,
B*gg*
I've lost the thread of this argument
what am i supposed to be doing next?
slang goog - they are now saying that python sucks
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Senior Project Officer
2009/12/18 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:29 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
While it's a noble pursuit to help a specific demographic I think it's
important not to exclude others in the process, most areas I've lived
in in the last 12 months
there is no structure left behind for burning men. as soon as all is
removed map should show current status again.
keeping it in the database is ok but the tags need to reflect that there
is nothing left on ground
*I think* it should be deleted in one changeset. Next year they could
2009/12/18 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
*but* i think this is nothing that we should do -- instead we should go
in conversation with the original author.
Flickr guys wished for 4D tagging, for things like photos taken at
burning man so you can geo-position them on the relevent map data
Hi,
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy.
I don't see why that should be relevant to us. China follows a no
mapping policy - do we care?
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
2009/12/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy.
I don't see why that should be relevant to us. China follows a no
mapping policy - do we care?
Isn't that like photos, they can prevent your from
On Friday 18 Dec 2009 2:27:42 pm Frederik Ramm wrote:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy.
I don't see why that should be relevant to us. China follows a no
mapping policy - do we care?
where is china?
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Senior Project Officer
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
Isn't that like photos, they can prevent your from creating the photo
(in some cases like events) but once it exists they have no rights to
make you delete it or have any rights over the image itself.
Burning Man sure *try* to regulate the publication of photos (they
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:57 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
The reduce the map frame size and put the ad along the bottom of the
map, also when taking a screen shot of this they also add ads on the
left hand pane.
http://img193.imageshack.us/i/googleadsc.png/
Hmm, I can't
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.comwrote:
We map what is on ground ( with some exceptions like boundaries)
And powerlines, and opening hours, and bus/tram/bike routes, and
proposed/planned/demolished buildings/roads, and ski runs, and culturally
interesting
Hi
As the mapper for Burning Man, let me explain a little bit about the festival,
and how I've attempted to represent it in OSM.
But first...
Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy. as alternative
it must be at least tagged
From: Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org
Date: Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Burning Man (was: revert changesets??)
To: Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com
Just a suggestion that I think will satisfy both camps:
When the burning man us remapped (i.e. moved), add the prefix
2009/12/18 Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com:
So that's the situation. I decided to represent the temporality by adding
start_date and end_date tags to the 2008 data, one of the suggestions of
I agree with comments on the 4D page about this that
start_date/end_date is a bit conflicting with
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
Burning man follows a no trace policy.
Who says this why?
Burning man policy
I'm definitely intrigued by this.
I thought they were all peace love!
Do you have a link to this policy?
Ta
Dave F.
___
talk
2009/12/18 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
Just a suggestion that I think will satisfy both camps:
When the burning man us remapped (i.e. moved), add the prefix burning_man:
to all tags, that will retain them in the database, erase them from maps,
but still allow for special interest maps
From: Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
Burning man follows a no trace policy.
Who says this why?
Burning man policy
I'm definitely intrigued by this.
I thought they were all peace love!
Do you have a link to this policy?
I explained in my
On 18/12/2009 11:51, Mikel Maron wrote:
beyond that, the layout retains importance as
geographic context to photos, videos, memories. If you look at the
flickr map, the background map depends on whether the photo was taken in
2008 or 2009.
2009/12/18 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
Of course, all photos should be geolocated in four dimensions of the
space-time continuum not just lat,lon but lat,lon,altitude and timestamp.
Silly? Perhaps a bit OTT at present, but...
Silly until altitude sensors/chips get a lot better...
Dave F. wrote:
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
Burning man follows a no trace policy.
Who says this why?
Burning man policy
I'm definitely intrigued by this.
I thought they were all peace love!
Do you have a link to this policy?
It's OK I found it:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:34 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
This is a documentation issue, not a viewing issue,
Buh?
the OSM website is
a bit disjointed, once a local entity is sorted out I'm planning to
get a localised a website setup and from there we can start to
2009/12/18 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Whatever you like, but I'm not seeing the link. I/you/anyone could fix the
wiki now...why the need for a local entity? Why do you really want to create
a new website?
Because it's easier that trying to spend time/effort getting the main
OSM site
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
Sam Vekemans wrote:
Where the only way i know to map it is to use a relation and call it
route=greenway and dont have it render on the cyclemap. Just map the
sections as appropriate.
Greenway is the US/Canadianism for cycleway.
I don't follow
Greg Troxel wrote:
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
Sam Vekemans wrote:
Where the only way i know to map it is to use a relation and call it
route=greenway and dont have it render on the cyclemap. Just map the
sections as appropriate.
Greenway is the US/Canadianism for cycleway.
El Viernes, 18 de Diciembre de 2009, Michael musset escribió:
Hi, i really need to convert an ESRI shapefile, do you have an idea ?
ogr2osm.
It still has a few problems running under windows, though, which I'm looking
into.
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega
thanks, but i get the same error for python script :
Traceback (most recent call last):
File ogr2osm.py, line 74, in ?
import ogr
ImportError: No module named ogr
and it is weird because i 've already installed python-gdal package
2009/12/18 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
Greg Troxel wrote:
like this ?
http://www.mass.gov/dcr/parks/northeast/nash.htm
here, that's definitely 'rail trail'. is that similar to wha you mean
in France ?
Not all voies vertes are rail trails but the ones I mentioned
definitely are.
I did not know rail trail - thanks for that
On 18 Dec 2009, at 24:57 , Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
should be deleted then. Burning man follows a no trace policy.
I don't see why that should be relevant to us. China follows a no mapping
policy - do we care?
you have spent to much time on mapping. ;-)
no
On 18 Dec 2009, at 24:42 , Peter Körner wrote:
there is no structure left behind for burning men. as soon as all is
removed map should show current status again.
keeping it in the database is ok but the tags need to reflect that there
is nothing left on ground
*I think* it should be
On 18 Dec 2009, at 3:51 , Mikel Maron wrote:
Of course, we now have a map with data shown past the end_date for the 2008
event. The most obvious option is tuning the renderers to data past it's end
date. There's downsides to that .. larger planet size, increased complexity
in
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/12/18 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
Just a suggestion that I think will satisfy both camps:
When the burning man us remapped (i.e. moved), add the prefix
burning_man:
to all tags, that will retain
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/12/18 David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com:
Of course, all photos should be geolocated in four dimensions of the
space-time continuum not just lat,lon but lat,lon,altitude and timestamp.
Silly? Perhaps a
2009/12/19 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
Fotos are already timestamped, both in EXIF (together with GeoCode), and in
the file itself. That should give you enough data for setting the foto in
the time axis of a 4D map.
I know some cameras give you bearing and angle above/below the
horizon,
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/18 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
Just a suggestion that I think will satisfy both camps:
When the burning man us remapped (i.e. moved), add the prefix burning_man:
to all tags, that will retain them in
Is there someone know how to convert an autocad file to osm ?
I have my own OSM server, but i don't kknow how to add autocad data.
I use JOSM, but i didn't find a plugin to do that.
Also OpenJump support .shp but i didn't find a way to convert this file into
osm after that..
Do you have an
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org wrote:
It is not only rendering software, but all software that use the spatial
data in some way or another.
A few years ago, you could pretty much assume that any untagged
segment in the OSM database was a road. Renderers
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:33:41PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
Greg Troxel wrote:
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
Sam Vekemans wrote:
Where the only way i know to map it is to use a relation and call it
route=greenway and dont have it render on the cyclemap. Just map
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:16 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/19 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
I prefer the principle of least surprise when working with OSM data.
The most basic analysis of the data should have the least gotchas
possible. So we should avoid tagging
2009/12/19 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
Those who are interested in historical maps will need to know about
the 4th dimension and whatever tags are involved. Those who aren't,
shouldn't need to.
Initially it may well be a niche activity, but long term roads move
etc, and it's often
On 18/12/2009 12:19, David Earl wrote:
Actually if photos are geolocated like that, they also need a reference
datum stored too - how else will the space tourists of the future locate
their photos on the moon and on Mars?
Taking this to extremes:
Hey OSMers!
It's official...
We'll all be basking in sunshine in southern Spain at the 4th Annual State of
the Map on July 9-11, 2010.
For more information, visit the wiki at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/State_Of_The_Map_2010
Our host city is Girona, Spain.
Girona, (or
Hello OpenStreetMappers,
I acknowledge that the OSM leadership is serious about baking in the ShareAlike
requirement into the allowed usage of OSM data.
I also acknowledge that there is a significant proportion of contributors that
are happy for their works to be used more broadly.
If you
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:11 PM, OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote:
filtering-out historical data (date_end doesn't exist or is in the
past) is 1 or 2 rules. Any application needs tens or hundreds of
rules to even begin to understand OSM (try defining 'can you cycle on
this' or 'is this
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Hurricane
hurric...@hurricanemcewen.comwrote:
We'll all be basking in sunshine in southern Spain at the 4th Annual State
of the Map on July 9-11, 2010.
Would that be the bit of southern Spain that is in the north east corner of
the country? ;)
80n
Excuses voor het bewerken van jullie mooie kaart, zal ik proberen mijn
wijzigingen ongedaan te maken, of kan ik dat beter ook aan anderen
overlaten?
--
André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
Andre,
2009/12/18 Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com:
Excuses voor het bewerken van jullie mooie kaart, zal ik proberen mijn
wijzigingen ongedaan te maken, of kan ik dat beter ook aan anderen
overlaten?
Apologies accepted :-)
Och, het gebeurt ons allemaal wel eens. Maar, gelukkig zijn er
2009/12/18 Christ van Willegen cvwille...@gmail.com:
Andre,
2009/12/18 Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com:
Excuses voor het bewerken van jullie mooie kaart, zal ik proberen mijn
wijzigingen ongedaan te maken, of kan ik dat beter ook aan anderen
overlaten?
Apologies accepted :-)
Och, het
Vrijdag 8 januari, café Het Loosje, Nieuwmarkt, Amsterdam, vanaf zes uur?
Ik heb geen budget, dus gewoon going Dutch ;)
Of doe een mooi ander voorstel!
Martijn
On Dec 8, 2009, at 9:14 PM, Freek wrote:
On Tuesday 08 December 2009, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
dag medemappers,
wie heeft er
Het is niet 'jullie' kaart, het is 'onze' kaart! :)
Wat was er aan de hand dan?
On Dec 18, 2009, at 2:24 PM, Andre Engels wrote:
Excuses voor het bewerken van jullie mooie kaart, zal ik proberen mijn
wijzigingen ongedaan te maken, of kan ik dat beter ook aan anderen
overlaten?
--
André
Je kunt tegenwoordig ook een volledige historydump downloaden! Voor de
gevorderde gebruiker ;) 12GB Bzip2 compressed.
On Dec 14, 2009, at 8:33 PM, YRS wrote:
Hallo allemaal,
Ik mis een area in mijn omgeving (waterpartij). Het zou kunnen dat
iemand hem met een goede reden heeft
2009/12/18 Martijn van Exel mve...@gmail.com:
Het is niet 'jullie' kaart, het is 'onze' kaart! :)
Wat was er aan de hand dan?
Ruzie op de tagging-mailinglijst, over wanneer iets highway=cycleway mag heten.
--
André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com
___
Alweer over cycleways?! Het houdt ook nooit op ;)
Was er een duidelijke uitkomst / consensus / conclusie die je kunt crossposten
naar talk-nl?
Martijn
On Dec 18, 2009, at 5:50 PM, Andre Engels wrote:
2009/12/18 Martijn van Exel mve...@gmail.com:
Het is niet 'jullie' kaart, het is 'onze'
2009/12/18 Martijn van Exel mve...@gmail.com:
Alweer over cycleways?! Het houdt ook nooit op ;)
Was er een duidelijke uitkomst / consensus / conclusie die je kunt
crossposten naar talk-nl?
Als er een duidelijke consensus was, had ik het niet over 'ruzie' gehad.
Mijn standpunt was: Als er
2009/12/18 Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com:
2009/12/18 Martijn van Exel mve...@gmail.com:
Alweer over cycleways?! Het houdt ook nooit op ;)
Was er een duidelijke uitkomst / consensus / conclusie die je kunt
crossposten naar talk-nl?
Als er een duidelijke consensus was, had ik het niet
Hmmm,
ik had gister het idee geopperd om het 10 januari in Utrecht te vieren
(Cafe De Bastaard) maar aangezien jij als eerste aan de bel trekt vind ik
dit ook een goed idee hoor.
Groet,
Floris
Martijn van Exel wrote:
Vrijdag 8 januari, café Het Loosje, Nieuwmarkt, Amsterdam, vanaf zes uur?
Ik
Andre Engels wrote:
2009/12/18 Martijn van Exel mve...@gmail.com:
Alweer over cycleways?! Het houdt ook nooit op ;)
Was er een duidelijke uitkomst / consensus / conclusie die je kunt
crossposten naar talk-nl?
Als er een duidelijke consensus was, had ik het niet over 'ruzie' gehad.
Mijn
2009/12/18 Floris Looijesteijn o...@floris.nu:
Andre Engels wrote:
2009/12/18 Martijn van Exel mve...@gmail.com:
Alweer over cycleways?! Het houdt ook nooit op ;)
Was er een duidelijke uitkomst / consensus / conclusie die je kunt
crossposten naar talk-nl?
Als er een duidelijke consensus
Kom op, geen gal spuwen. Er is geen absolute waarheid, hoogstens een
meerderheidsstandpunt. En als je overtuigende redenen hebt om daarvan af te
wijken, dan staat niemand je in de weg.
Martijn
On Dec 19, 2009, at 12:08 AM, Andre Engels wrote:
2009/12/18 Floris Looijesteijn o...@floris.nu:
2009/12/19 Martijn van Exel mve...@gmail.com:
Kom op, geen gal spuwen. Er is geen absolute waarheid, hoogstens een
meerderheidsstandpunt. En als je overtuigende redenen hebt om daarvan af te
wijken, dan staat niemand je in de weg.
Dank je... Ik zit er geloof ik nog steeds een beetje mee in
Op 19-12-09 08:20, Andre Engels schreef:
Dank je... Ik zit er geloof ik nog steeds een beetje mee in m'n maag.
In elk geval blij dat het hier een stuk vriendelijker aan toe gaat.
Waar niet dan?
(Wat zijn hier trouwens mensen vroeg wakker op zaterdag!)
Stefan
2009/12/18 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
Likewise it's not necessary to have multiple nodes on a straight section of
road (unless it's really long). As an example I just came across one
straight road that was 150m long. It had 6 nodes on it where it could have
been drawn with three. One
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:31 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Technically all it does is introduce it to the map features page, but
that doesn't mean you can't use it anyway, it doesn't mean you can't
document it's usage on other pages, although some people say that map
features
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Likewise it's not necessary to have multiple nodes on a straight section of
road (unless it's really long). As an example I just came across one
straight road that was 150m long. It had 6 nodes on it where it could have
2009/12/18 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
In that case, the voting means nothing at all? Weird.
It's a left over practise from a time it would have been more
appropriate/useful, but since the number of users have increased by
several orders of magnitude it has become a much less efficient
2009/12/18 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I'm guilty of this sometimes. One reason for me comes from the method of
tracing: zoom in, mark points along the longest straight stretch you can
see, then pan the map, repeat, etc. If you're very zoomed in, you can't tell
that the road will be
As per email below, intersection_simple.jpg is the method I have adopted.
Agree with multiple nodes on straight roads, I have been fixing them up as I
find them.
Separated ways is an interesting one and people do it differently. I am of
the opinion that they have to be 'physically separate' ie
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:13:44 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Likewise it's not necessary to have multiple nodes on a straight section of
road (unless it's really long). As an example I just came across
Separated ways is an interesting one and people do it differently. I am of
the opinion that they have to be 'physically separate' ie there must be some
barrier (island) between them (other than a solid white line - which can be
seen in the link to the OSM map of the intersection under current
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Better way to do it is zoomed out so you can see the whole section you want
to trace. Mark an end point then mark the other end. Then zoom and
accurately adjust the end points, once they are in the correct place then
2009/12/18 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Yeah but then if there are curvy bits – which I want to be maximally zoomed
in for – that doesn't work. Personally I'm not seeing a lot of harm in
excess nodes. Of all the things you could do wrong, it ranks pretty low in
harm.
You're right, there
Better way to do it is zoomed out so you can see the whole section you want
to trace. Mark an end point then mark the other end. Then zoom and
accurately adjust the end points, once they are in the correct place then
add extra points if necessary.
Yeah but then if there are curvy
There is also Vic police locations as part of the
data.australia.gov.au release, it's under cc-by:
http://data.australia.gov.au/406
Even has lat/lon, but isn't listed under the geography section...
Makes me wonder if there are other similar datasets that aren't listed
under geography but have
I just took a look at a few in JOSM and they must have used some other
datum, if anyone call tell me which one and/or how to convert to WGS84
I'll update the osm file.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Or just another case of bad geocoding...
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
I've been looking over the data.australia.gov.au site some more, so
far there is a kml file for vic hospitals, as a result most of the
useful information is in html type formating and seems to include a
lot of disclaimers about the information being best effort/use at own
risk...
I should have included a direct link to the page:
http://data.australia.gov.au/404
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Another document with lat/lon data, but this one will need to be dealt
with manually, contains locations and types of projects money is being
spent on, seems to be useful for extracting school and park locations,
and locations of rail way crossings/bridges that are being upgraded,
among other
Yet another document with lat/lon that wasn't in the Geography category:
http://data.australia.gov.au/80
I've converted this to an osm file:
http://map-data.bigtincan.com/data/centrelink.osm.bz2
Wasn't sure how to tag these so came up with the following:
node id='-1' action='create'
Department of Planning and Infrastructure (NT) has a bunch of data
uploaded to data.australia.gov.au which includes lat/lon:
http://data.australia.gov.au/76
This spread sheet includes schools, parks, fire/ambulence stations,
libraries, museums and aboriginal communities.
Majority of the data is
2009/12/19 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
For changing roads, I think the future of changesets will allow us to revert
changes as well as have a way to retrieve historical data. I guess that a
future API version will allow you to see how the world looked in 2009, so
that non-existing roads
Why wouldn't the address be entered using the Karlsruhe system?
Is the data all in one line and it would need more processing?
I normally enter urls using the url tag.
Keep up the great work!
Evan
On Friday 18 Dec 2009 16:59:01 John Smith wrote:
Yet another document with lat/lon that wasn't in
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
I should have included a direct link to the page:
http://data.australia.gov.au/404
There are other interesting ones
South Australian Boat Ramp Locations
http://data.australia.gov.au/99
Medicare Offices is Just addresses
There is a link to
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
I have not changed the current intersection in osm but here are two screen
shots of the intersection in josm.
http://www.4x4falcon.com/osm/junctions/intersection_messy.jpg
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:03 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
... seems to include a
lot of disclaimers about the information being best effort/use at own
risk...
Probably just covering their back - because people looking for a
hospital do tend to be at risk if the data's
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
In that case, the voting means nothing at all? Weird.
From my perspective, voting's similar to asking for opinions on an
email list, just with the added benefit of yes/no responses and
documentation of results.
Roy Wallace wrote:
+1. A problem with the router requires a simple ROUTER fix. The router
just needs to be told that when entering a junction with a roundabout,
that also happens to have an exit, that exit counts as the first
exit.
I can just see the people at Garmin falling over themselves
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
The real issue here is what are we mapping - and with the
intersection example, the issue seems to be whether the ways should
accurately correspond to geographic reality (_messy), or not
(_simple).
IMHO, it's quite
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 2:22 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
Another document with lat/lon data, but this one will need to be dealt
with manually, contains locations and types of projects money is being
spent on, seems to be useful for extracting school and park locations,
and
Yeah, good work. Should the name be Bairnsdale Centrelink or just
Centrelink?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Steve Bennett wrote:
Yeah, good work. Should the name be Bairnsdale Centrelink or just
Centrelink?
I'm all for putting town/suburb names in as well. One place where it
matters is looking up POIs on GPS units.
These are sorted by proximity to current location. And when using the
feature to
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 9:46 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
I thought long and hard about this issue before I make the first
correction to a local roundabout. I came to the conclusion that
roundabout entry and exit points should be separate.
Sure, and I see the logic - but the
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
Yeah, good work. Should the name be Bairnsdale Centrelink or just
Centrelink?
I'm all for putting town/suburb names in as well. One place where it
matters is looking up POIs on GPS units.
These
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure, and I see the logic - but the fact you needed to think long and
hard means it's probably better if the routing can be fixed to cope
with either kind of mapping.
Yes. Although if we're trying to make our map data
2009/12/19 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:03 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
... seems to include a
lot of disclaimers about the information being best effort/use at own
risk...
Probably just covering their back - because people looking for a
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
But isn't this a problem with the user i.e. the GPS unit software?
I.e. shouldn't the suburb be retrieved from an admin boundary if
required? IMHO the name=* value should be the name. If it's actually
called Bairnsdale
2009/12/19 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
I should have included a direct link to the page:
http://data.australia.gov.au/404
There are other interesting ones
South Australian Boat Ramp Locations
http://data.australia.gov.au/99
Yea, the boat ramps and boating
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
2009/12/19 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, John Smith wrote:
I should have included a direct link to the page:
http://data.australia.gov.au/404
There are other interesting ones
South Australian Boat Ramp Locations
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
