On 2018-07-03 09:49, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Now that I know about existence of FIXME tag I can add support for it
in my tools at 1% of cost of going through mechanical edit.
The entire point is not to support may particular usecase, the point
is to save people in future from spending time on
On 2018-06-29 17:27, Carlos Cámara wrote:
Dear all,
After participating in this openstreetmap-carto issue [1] discussing
to create an icon for casinos in which I stated that they should not
be highlighted with an icon due to their grave consequences derived
from gambling addiction (there are
What kind of copyright infringement are you talking about? Jeroen wants
to know what city it is. How can this possibly be a copyright
infringment and why should he not use the image?
Maarten
On 2018-06-20 15:00, Milo van der Linden wrote:
Screenshots from google maps infringe copyright. I
struggling to think where I would find one.
Phil (trigpoint)
On 3 June 2018 19:29:24 BST, Maarten Deen wrote:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
3. Jun 2018 18:05 by ba...@ursamundi.org:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
I am looking
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 11:46 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
3. Jun 2018 18:05 by ba...@ursamundi.org:
On Sun, Jun 3, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
I am looking for an application for Android displaying
amenity=drinking_water
locations with available offline map - I am
On 2018-06-03 17:54, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
I am looking for an application for Android displaying
amenity=drinking_water
locations with available offline map - I am frequently using it to
avoid buying plastic bottles
Osmand does that. Just start with typing "drinking" into the POI search.
On 2018-05-04 00:33, Joe Matazzoni wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I’ll look for your contributions on the project talk page. Thanks.
Meanwhile, here are answers to your questions:
1. The localized maps lack fallback rules (I'm speaking of Polish
language at least). I would ask for English as a fallback
On 2018-04-24 19:40, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
I fully agree that it is a problem. I encountered nasty issues after
implementing name rendering fallback with following language order
(order is simplified for this example):
name:pl, name:en, name:de, name
Intention was to render English name in
On 2018-04-14 10:15, Michael Reichert wrote:
The list of good and bad tags can be found on the wiki
That is my whole point. No you can not. Some messages can be found
verbatim, some can be found only if you connect the dots (that
error_something_with_description means that the node has a
On 2018-04-13 09:52, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 13. Apr 2018, at 08:54, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com
wrote:
Yes, that's it, but where is it written? ;)
Josm validator warnings are often about problems that are not
explicitly described and
On 2018-04-13 05:02, Jack Armstrong dan...@sprynet.com wrote:
OSM Inspector tags some individual address nodes as errors. For
example, these nodes located inside the lateral boundaries of
buildings:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=5438712543#map=19/39.68899/-104.86454
I guess I'm
You probably have to check the logfiles. Not sure if you can do this
from within the wiki.
Maarten
On 2018-03-16 12:38, john whelan wrote:
But how would you check this?
Thanks John
On 16 March 2018 at 07:31, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
That is a different matter. This is
That is a different matter. This is about the possibility that on person
makes multiple wiki accunts and use those to vote (thereby cheating the
vote).
I think it would be a good thing to check this.
Maarten
On 2018-03-16 12:18, James wrote:
You could also argue the opposite way: Not
On 2018-03-05 06:23, Rodrigo Rodríguez wrote:
These are sort of the things I would appreciate I could be able to
map in OSM. Even with the subjective point of view that might
represent to tag a way as insecure or not, it is easily achievable to
determine a way or schema in wich you could
On 2018-02-23 11:35, Rory McCann wrote:
On 23/02/18 06:53, Maarten Deen wrote:
I see nothing wrong with those examples, I would do it the same,
especially if the rivers can be sailed on by boat. Then you absolutely
need the rivers to be connected to a central river (or fairway) in the
lake
On 2018-02-22 22:59, Rory McCann wrote:
Hi mappers,
What's the best way to map rivers that flow into lakes, especially when
another river flows through it? Should they be connected?
When a river flows through a lake, you can map a waterway=river way
through it, to be "topoligcally complete".
On 2018-02-19 10:17, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 08:12:45PM +0100, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2018-02-18 20:07, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl>
> wrote:
>
> > On 2018-02-18 19:28, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
On 2018-02-18 20:07, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl>
wrote:
On 2018-02-18 19:28, Tom Hughes wrote:
I can't comment about how the algorithm works because I don't know
anything about it. I'm just saying that we do tell it the v
On 2018-02-18 19:28, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 18/02/18 18:04, Paul Johnson wrote:
OK, so what can we do about this problem? For example, go to Jenks,
Oklahoma. Search for Walmart. First result isn't the Walmart
Neighborhood Market across the street from the Riverside Market
shopping center.
On 2018-02-17 10:56, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
This article is on the front page of the Slashdot today:
Fri 16 February 2018 "Why OpenStreetMap is in Serious Trouble"
https://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2018/02/16/osm-is-in-trouble/
Interesting that he mentions that "the proprietary mapping world
On 2018-02-14 19:39, Dave F wrote:
On 14/02/2018 18:23, Johan C wrote:
No, they are not. Roundabouts are special types of intersections.
Which is another type of intersection.
They have a way on which you can drive round. And round. And round.
And they have other ways leading to and from
On 2018-02-14 18:50, Dave F wrote:
On 14/02/2018 17:13, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2018-02-14 17:39, Dave F wrote:
I think I have read it correctly.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5408566797
It is easy to determine this shared node is part of the roundabout as
well as the entrance from
ed by a node) you
do not enter that road so you do not need instructions for it.
Maarten
On 14/02/2018 16:17, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2018-02-14 15:53, Dave F wrote:
Hi
Could anyone give me an explanation for this line from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout
"
On 2018-02-14 15:53, Dave F wrote:
Hi
Could anyone give me an explanation for this line from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout
"Each road has to be connected with the roundabout in a separate
node—that is, between these nodes a segment of the roundabout is
required."
On 2018-01-12 15:07, Michael Reichert wrote:
Hi,
OSMCha started posting comments to changesets a few days ago when a
user
marks a changeset as good or bad.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wille/diary/43101
I would like to ask the author(s) of OSMCha to disable this feature.
We expect to
On 2017-12-25 13:15, Sérgio V. wrote:
What a weird new zero edditting user added me as OSM friend. Specially
considering this morning.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/StonefireArms
Don't want firearms as Christmas gift. Not much to do with OSM. I
hope.
FYI:
On 2017-10-25 07:31, Daniel Koć wrote:
W dniu 25.10.2017 o 07:08, Roland Olbricht pisze:
See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Wikipedia_users#Original_research_always_wins
Why is this page named "Welcome_to_Wikipedia_users"? Can we just move
it to
Of course this is impractical in the UI in the current way of selecting
layers (where each layer has its own check box to enable it), I was more
thinking in the line of having a dropdown box for all language overlays.
No idea if this is currently possible in openlayers.
Maarten
On
On 2017-09-24 23:01, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to ask for your opinion on the choice of language used in
the Default map on openstreetmap.org.
This map (based on the openstreetmap-carto style) currently displays
all labels in their native language (as defined in the 'name'
On 2017-09-20 23:10, john whelan wrote:
I was at a presentation yesterday evening about accessibility, well it
was free coffee what more can I say?
All Ottawa buses have two spaces for wheelchairs. We map wheelchair
accessible toilets and other things for the map but we currently as
far as I
On 2017-08-28 13:02, Christoph Hormann wrote:
On Monday 28 August 2017, Greg Morgan wrote:
We do get to go through the five stages. We do get to express the
emotions until acceptance of our fate as part of the healing process.
There is no rubber stamping!
On 2017-05-05 10:35, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 05.05.2017 um 09:47 schrieb Maarten Deen:
..
We have all agreed to the contributor terms (although I can not find
the version I have agreed to, I can only find a version from 2016) and
that says that OSMF has the right to sub-license.
PS
https
On 2017-05-05 09:17, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 05.05.2017 um 00:39 schrieb Michał Brzozowski:
...
Also, I see no reasonable way that upcoming EU privacy rules would
affect us. Would they consider OSM as a special case or what?
Everything mappers do, as has been said, is consensual and explicit.
And FYI: there is a maproulette challenge to change the landuse=farm
areas
http://maproulette.org/ui/metrics/2374
But it lists "only" 14.828 available tasks.
Maarten
On 2017-03-22 14:39, joost schouppe wrote:
In Belgium, the convention is to use farmland for growing plants, and
landuse=meadow
On 2017-03-20 11:10, Alert Bouterse wrote:
Beste OSM-mers
Ik heb een vraagje, Bij de ABN Amrobank (in schiedam) staat wel de
ATM, maar niet de bank, Ik dacht dus even de bank toe te voegen. Nu
zie ik staan in een van de instellingen de vraag of er een publieke
ATM beschikbaar is. Ja, naturlijk.
On 2017-03-11 16:50, James wrote:
Honestly, I'm not sure why this wasnt built into JOSM or P2 or ID for
that matter as strip functions are readily available if not, very easy
to code
Maybe you should open a bug report to request the feature. I think
JOSM warns you about it but still would be
de link
Verzonden vanaf Samsung-tablet.
Oorspronkelijk bericht
Van: Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl>
Datum: 04-03-17 08:59 (GMT+01:00)
Aan: talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: [OSM-talk-nl] Maproulette challenge voor dubbele amenity's
Bij de AND import zijn er een aantal
Bij de AND import zijn er een aantal nodes aangemaakt die amenity=,
amenity_1= enz. hadden. Die zijn later gecombineerd tot één amenity tag
als amenity=parking;fuel.
Deze worden niet gerenderd op de kaart, ze staan meestal op de verkeerde
plek (ook als onderdeel van een way) en zullen
On 2017-02-23 11:23, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/02/17 09:48, Jochen Topf wrote:
Every larger system that allows user contributions has a "report this
as
spam" button. If a few people click on that, an admin reviews and
handles this. Sounds like an obvious solution that could also work for
OSM.
On 2017-02-18 12:37, Tomas Straupis wrote:
Another interesting example are polygons like this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400182030
Polygon geometry is fine here, but it has one pointless node close
to one of the nodes. Pointless because it does not influence the final
geometry of the
On 2017-02-18 12:18, Jochen Topf wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 09:48:08AM +0100, Maarten Deen wrote:
Is the back-end of Maproulette offline? I can access the site, I can
see the
challenges and the metrics, but when I want to start a challenge I
only get
to see the OSM map in my neighborhood
Is the back-end of Maproulette offline? I can access the site, I can see
the challenges and the metrics, but when I want to start a challenge I
only get to see the OSM map in my neighborhood and it doesn't assign a
task.
Also: there is no contact information? Is this the best way to get in
On 2017-02-10 19:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 02/10/2017 07:33 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2017-02-10 12:09, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 02/10/2017 11:58 AM, Maarten Deen wrote:
Hoe kun je deze beelden in JOSM krijgen?
Via Imagery Preferences, en dan de WMS of WMTS toevoegen m.b.v
On 2017-02-10 12:09, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 02/10/2017 11:58 AM, Maarten Deen wrote:
Hoe kun je deze beelden in JOSM krijgen?
Via Imagery Preferences, en dan de WMS of WMTS toevoegen m.b.v. de URLs
die op NGR staan.
Er staan een flink aantal URLs op op die site en ik heb er ook
On 2017-02-08 23:01, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
Vraagje van een noob (dat ben ik),
Ik heb vanochtend een wijziging gemaakt, en vraag me af of ik dat op de
aanbevolen manier heb gedaan. Het gaat om
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45910956
De gemeente heeft een wandelpad (een trap) afgesloten
On 2017-01-31 19:04, Guillaume Rischard wrote:
Hello everyone,
There's a pull request to limit changesets to 10k changes, and it
would be good to get community input.
I've opened a discussion here:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/operations/issues/144
See the interesting comments on the PR
On 2017-01-30 12:07, Simon Poole wrote:
I suspect the main problem is that in 2007 we didn't really have a lot
of data so rendering tiles or it is really not such a big issue.
However 2010 and later would require per point in time a rather
largish rendering DB plus space for tiles a model that
What would be really wonderful is a yearly layer so you can see the
history changing. Just like http://topotijdreis.nl/
Maarten
On 2017-01-28 16:08, joost schouppe wrote:
Any chance we'll see some middle version there too in the future?
(say, 2012. And than later, 1/1/20**)
You gave us a
I am working on bus routes and regularly download a whole area worth of
bus routes with Overpass. What I see quite frequently is that some edit
is done and in the aftermath a lot of copies of a busroute have been
created with just a few (sometimes just one) member.
These all seem to be in
ave my own), then downloading works.
Regards,
Maarten
-----
DE : Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl>
À : talk@openstreetmap.org; j...@openstreetmap.org
ENVOYÉ LE : lundi 26 décembre 2016 10h14
OBJET : [OSM-talk] Overpass API from JOSM does not honor bounding box
anymore?
I'm trying
I'm trying the overpass API from JOSM and keep getting timeouts.
According to the docs, the bounding box for the Overpass query would be
set automatically when selecting an area in the map in the download
screen, but I do not see that in the resulting query that gets logged.
Trying the
On 2016-11-14 15:38, Colin Smale wrote:
Op computerwereld.nl - 4 open source projecten die bijna kopje onder
gaan
Ook in de lijst - OpenStreetMap!!! Blijkbaar komen we $30k/jaar te
kort
http://computerworld.nl/open-source/95055-4-open-source-projecten-die-bijna-kopje-onder-gaan/pagina-2
Ik kwam via-via op deze blog uit:
https://josbertlonnee.wordpress.com/2016/02/11/post-bezorgen-voor-sandd/
Afgezien van reclame voor dit geweldige bedrijf (huhu) blijkt dat Sandd
kaartjes van OSM aan de bezorgers geeft. Dit ziet er uit als de
standaard mapnik rendering, waarschijnlijk zit
On 2016-11-02 12:17, Lester Caine wrote:
On 02/11/16 11:04, Milo van der Linden wrote:
As a devops I understand your pain ;-) but for OSRM, I found that
using
docker and staying on a fixed docker version for OSRM makes the pain
a
lot easier. You say you are using GPS in the car, do you also
On 2016-10-11 19:39, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I'm speaking (about Wikipedia and Wikidata, not OSM - though it may
get mentioned ;-) ) in Pristina, Kosovo, next week, at "Software
Freedom Kosova 2016: SFK16":
http://sfk.flossk.org/sfk16/
Are any OSM folk going? Do we know the local editors there?
landscape boven elkaar. Dan is
het nog klein genoeg. De deel-PDF's zal best goed kunnen uitkomen.
Maarten
On Thursday, 6 October 2016 21:53:35 CEST Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2016-10-06 12:51, Reinier Battenberg wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> Vanaf 11 december gaat Arriva het openbaar vervoer i
On 2016-10-06 12:51, Reinier Battenberg wrote:
Hallo,
Vanaf 11 december gaat Arriva het openbaar vervoer in Limburg
overnemen. Op 5
Oktober hebben ze hun, gedeeltelijk nieuwe, buslijnen gepubliceerd
http://
www.limburger.nl/cnt/dmf20161005_00025183/dag-van-de-waarheid-voor-limburgs-
On 2016-08-31 09:39, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
On 31/08/16 07:54, Andreas Vilén wrote:
Imo it's better to let these areas choose their own (classic)
addresses and then report these to the authorities.
/Andreas
It looks like they are trying to do exactly this. Here is a map of a
part of Rio
On 2016-08-12 09:48, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
On 11.08.2016 20:37, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
...
The activity areas aren't merely about the usage itself, but, well,
the activity - i.e. concentration of interesting places and number
of
people visiting them (or other similar popularity metric).
On 2016-08-07 08:29, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
I don't know if I understand you right, but different colors for
different
purposes is hardly an innovation.
You haven't got the point I guess. The new
On 2016-08-07 01:43, Michał Brzozowski wrote:
There has been an update to Google Maps styling [1] and I have to say,
they left me impressed.
The overall look is cleaner, which is very welcome after a series of
disappointing changes, but the thing I consider very innovative is how
buildings (and
I'm quite positive that I just saw a shot of a computer of one of the F1
teams showing the OSM with a rainradar overlay during qualifying of the
GP of Hungary.
Is that a public service from some organisation in Hungary or did they
develop this themselves?
Regards,
Maarten
On 2016-07-13 11:35, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2016-07-13 10:23, Lester Caine wrote:
W3W and OLC both have the same problem. They are trying to fix
something
which is not really broken.
I disagree with this... They are not trying to replace / fix up
lat/lon, they are providing a lingua franca
On 2016-06-23 11:05, Daniel Koć wrote:
W dniu 23.06.2016 10:14, Rory McCann napisał(a):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdRO-QZaWX8
Someone's made a video of the node edit history of OSM. As nodes were
edited, the pixel changes. It's from 2006 to 2016, and covers the
whole
world. Pretty
On 2016-05-13 14:59, Grant Slater wrote:
Kudos for the very clear explanation.
Over today (for at least the weekend) we are switching to the new
frontend & backend servers in York (Bytemark). London Imperial will be
offline from approximately 5pm (GMT+1) for the first weekend of power
On 2016-03-26 20:59, Steve Coast wrote:
Ok so look, Slack took over the world. And it turns out it’s pretty
good and useful. Let’s have an official OSM slack.
Maybe I'm living under a rock, but I only know Slack as a short for
Slackware, a Linux distribution.
What is this and why do I need
On 2016-03-22 14:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
# First goal:
First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations
which have a natural=water . Then, it will:
* Delete natural=water from all the ways if they are NOT closed or
ring 0.
I have been fixing waterways and water
On 2016-02-04 07:58, Paul Johnson wrote:
I suspect you're onto something here; it's not a phrase that's even in
my GIS vernacular. Don't even recall it from college experience
(though I took French and majored in civil engineering; amazing I'm
not mapping professionally)...
True. I think
On 2016-01-21 23:16, Paul Norman wrote:
On 1/21/2016 1:44 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
When we are done cleaning up Starbucks, we'll still have at least one
Starbucks with a wikipedia link, the original store
But this won't be a link to the Starbucks article, but instead the
specific one on that
On 2016-01-10 20:38, Johan C wrote:
We zijn erg verheugd om aan te kondigen dat CycloMedia via WMS
luchtfoto's 2014 in een resolutie van 50 cm. ter beschikking stelt aan
OpenStreetMap. Om toegang te krijgen tot de luchtfoto's moet je een
licentie aangaan met CycloMedia. Dat kun je hier doen:
On 2015-12-30 16:33, Dongpo Deng wrote:
Hi all,
There is a problem for tagging shelters. In Taiwan, some of schools
are selected to be shelters for villages or small regions when a
disaster happens. However, it is conflict to annotate two amenities on
a geometry object. That is, we cannot
On 2015-12-23 14:05, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
There's an existing route relation that's out of date. A duplicate,
but more accurate one has just been created. To maintain the history
of the existing relation I don't want ot delete it.
Is there an easy way to transfer the newer data into the original
On 2015-12-14 09:25, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 05:52:21PM -0500, John Goodman wrote:
Am I missing something, or is there no way to sort Nominatim
searches on the main OpenStreetMap map page?
For example, if my map is showing an area of the United States where
I happen to
On 2015-12-14 09:34, Sarah Hoffmann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 08:45:38AM +0100, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2015-12-14 01:02, Tom Hughes wrote:
>On 13/12/15 22:52, John Goodman wrote:
>
>>For example, if my map is showing an area of the United States where I
>>happen to know
On 2015-12-14 01:02, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 13/12/15 22:52, John Goodman wrote:
For example, if my map is showing an area of the United States where I
happen to know a mapped Starbucks exists, and I search for "Starbucks"
in the search panel, the entire panel is filled with Starbucks in
Japan.
On 2015-12-09 09:58, Volker Schmidt wrote:
A few suggestions.
On-line maps for cyclists:
* Opencyclemap (Opencyclmap.org) shows both infrastructure for
bicycles as means of transportation (cycle paths etc.) and
infrastructure for cycle tourism (cycle routes)
*
On 2015-11-22 13:34, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2015-11-22 13:18, Maarten Deen wrote:
I also don't understand this:"It's a non-hierarchical system. The
problem with latitude and longitude coordinates is that if you make
a mistake when writing them down you will be completely lost. But
wit
On 2015-11-22 12:07, Colin Smale wrote:
I guess there would be no objections to someone adding
addr:w3w:en=nice.place.here ? Or addr:w3w=en:nice.place.here ?
Reading about what it is, it is just a lookup between some random three
words and a location. We don't map addr:latlon=51.34,3.45 in
On 2015-10-14 11:31, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 10/14/2015 10:56 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
(If this happens - if the boundary is defined by the river or the
highway - then you still have various options of modeling this,
for
example having two ways share the same nodes,
On 2015-10-14 09:49, Badita Florin wrote:
Nodes 1856092007 [1] and 1856092002 [2] , which limit the following
way [3] between such nodes. This way is a highway and at the same time
is part of the relation of a boundary. This seems invalid since it
merges two types of features on the same way
I have received a private message from the user:
Hoi Maarten,
Met het aantal tracks wordt aangegeven het aantal sporen die parallel
aan elkaar liggen.
Tracks=1 = Enkelspoor Tracks=2 = Dubbelspoor Tracks=3 = Driesporig
Tracks=4 = Viersporig
Mvgr,
Wim
Translated:
The number of tracks
On 2015-10-12 12:05, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-10-12 11:09 GMT+02:00 Colin Smale :
about the sources of the other information (electrification info,
usage etc), maybe it's inside info, maybe it's a guess, or maybe he
is just widely-travelled.
not sure about
On 2015-10-08 09:44, Jo wrote:
The way I do it (and in no way am I saying it is the only way or the
correct way to do it, but it seems to hold up fine) is make one
relation for each seperate destination (usually two: a->b and b->a,
sometimes 4: a->c->b, a->d->b, b->c->a and b->d->a) and group
On 2015-10-08 10:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-10-08 10:26 GMT+02:00 Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl>:
Making a relation for each concession greatly improves
maintainability. You only have to load one relation in JOSM to get
all lines and work from there.
I would be really cross if s
I have asked WJtW about this in june this year but received no answer.
Then I saw user BAGgeraar remove the tracks tag so I asked him about it
and he too asked WJtW and received no answer.
On the german forum there is a thread [1] about it also indicating it is
a superfluous tag when all tracks
On 2015-10-08 04:12, Clifford Snow wrote:
I'm trying to add my first bus route. I'm struggling to understand how
to properly add the relation. The route, like most bus routes, loops
back over the same ways. So my questions:
If the bus travels over the same way going two different directions,
is
On 2015-09-30 11:14, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-09-30 10:18 GMT+02:00 Lauri Kytömaa :
In my experience collecting the signs exhaustively has revealed
smaller and
bigger errors in osm data, and also in the signs (say, "leaking"
zone signs,
missing parking restrictions
On 2015-09-30 11:29, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-09-30 11:25 GMT+02:00 Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl>:
The city of Amsterdam is very good at this. One-way streets very
often have no signs at the side where you are allowed to enter but
have a sign "closed for motorized traffi
On 2015-09-30 12:22, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
Am 30.09.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl>:
That turn restriction does not exist in real life, so you shouldn't
add it in OSM ;)
I'm not convinced it doesn't exist (the sign says you can
Hello!
New message, please read <http://neslojistik.com/places.php?tgh>
Maarten Deen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 2015-09-09 05:18, Warin wrote:
The some of the wiki pages appear to be written for the renders, while
others look to be written for the mappers. This is confusing!
I believe there should be two versions of the wiki pages - one for
mappers who need simple descriptions of the tag/s and another
On 2015-09-07 17:31, Russ Nelson wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/abandonedrails/permalink/1044885352211646/
It's on facebook and I have to log in to see it. I don't have a facebook
account, so could someone post here whay it says?
Regards,
Maarten
On 2015-09-02 11:12, Pander OpenTaal wrote:
Locaties van EAD's iets voor OSM?
https://www.aed4.eu/ en de database woont volgens mij bij
https://www.radboudumc.nl
AED's dus.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator
Ik zou zeggen van wel.
Maarten
On 2015-09-01 13:14, Dave F. wrote:
That the icon is used purely as a place holder & *removed* when a
picture is added proves its irrelevance.
Why would a newbie care or even need to know the XML structure of the
database?
Why is that relevant?
The wiki has to be a clear & simple as
On 2015-08-27 11:21, Dave F. wrote:
On 26/08/2015 21:54, Andrew Hain wrote:
Dave F. davefox at madasafish.com writes:
Hi
Bearing in mind the wiki is used more often by new OSM
contributors
therefore should be a clear concise as possible, I'm curious why
this
icon is so
prevalent:
On 2015-08-14 08:23, Russ Nelson wrote:
Maarten Deen writes:
On 2015-08-14 07:44, Russ Nelson wrote:
Maarten Deen writes:
I beg your pardon? I read this as nothing can be deleted,
since
you
say that deleting something you don't see (which usually means
it's
Is there a tool available to search for the history of items in a
specific area? OSM History Viewer only works if you have the id of an
object. I don't know if OWL can do it because it is offline.
I don't have the id for the node, I just know something was there and
has been deleted at some
On 2015-08-13 11:46, Ruben Maes wrote:
On Thursday 13 August 2015 08:22:59 Maarten Deen wrote:
Is there a tool available to search for the history of items in a
specific area? OSM History Viewer only works if you have the id of an
object. I don't know if OWL can do it because it is offline.
I
On 2015-08-14 05:09, Russ Nelson wrote:
Ian Dees writes:
I appreciate that there are strong feelings about this topic, but we
could
certainly use more constructive language and have a civilized
conversation.
I would love to have a civilized conversation with civilized people
who don't
On 2015-08-14 07:44, Russ Nelson wrote:
Maarten Deen writes:
I beg your pardon? I read this as nothing can be deleted, since
you
say that deleting something you don't see (which usually means it's
not
there) is reason for a ban.
No, nobody is going to get banned for just one action
101 - 200 di 917 matches
Mail list logo