In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
---
Application Error
---
Exception ECriticalSectionsLeak in module theBat.exe at 000481B5.
Resource leak: 3 instance(s) of TBatCriticalSection left
Caller addresses listed below:
0092DC2F 0092B4A1
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Once again:
---
Application Error
---
Exception ECriticalSectionsLeak in module theBat.exe at 000481B5.
Resource leak: 3 instance(s) of TBatCriticalSection left
Caller addresses listed below:
0092DC2F
I have opened BT bug report https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6442
regarding this issue!
--
Best regards,
Goncalo Farias
Expert - knows tomorrow why today's prediction failed.
Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Indie_Dev,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 12:06:17 AM, you wrote:
And if I breached anonymity and told the list who I was, you'd know
that apart from being a highly trained and well respected developer,
that I'm probably the _last_ person you'd want to be messing with
at the personal
Hello all,
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tbb39921.rar
[-] (AGAIN!) Filters should be loaded more correctly from now on (for MAU)
[-] cannot open the file mailto:; error message
when I started this build, warning dialog
Hello Marek,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 11:57:53, you wrote:
when I started this build, warning dialog about invalid argument
Invalid argument to date encode?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello all,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
when I started this build, warning dialog about invalid argument
Invalid argument to date encode?
maybe, but I am not sure, it was in czech...
BTW this window was hidden behind splashscreen and I was forced to confirm
it to open TB.
Goncalo Farias wrote:
I have opened BT bug report https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6442
regarding this issue!
fine. you've filed it. now fire it up (ask for some gasoline from some
people around here).
nya-nya-nya, thebutt goes titsup when i start it... hence seems to be a
female...
Hello Marck,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 1:55:30 AM, you wrote:
MDP An A*se is something that I will go no
MDP further in mentioning lest it be taken up and used in vain,
Moderator! He's using explicit sexual language!
MDP thus demanding an official trouting.
Of course, while you're at it, why
Hello,
I have tested https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6350 issue and for me,
template is stored. Can You check this please?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 3.99.21 (BETA)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Hello Marek,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 14:18:05, you wrote:
I have tested https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6350 issue and for me,
template is stored. Can You check this please?
Maybe the problems may ocur with national characters only?
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Hello all,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
I have tested https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6350 issue and for me,
template is stored. Can You check this please?
Maybe the problems may ocur with national characters only?
do not about previous versions, but I have tried
MDP thus demanding an official trouting.
Of course, while you're at it, why not add some
SM!!! :-)
With this in mind I would like to suggest the attached icon for
inclusion in version 4
--
Rick
The Bat Version 3.99.21 (BETA)
on Windows XP, Service Pack 2
attachment:
Reply to message sent 08/22/2007, @ 17:06:17 (4:06 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Indie_Dev,
And if I breached anonymity and told the list who I was, you'd know
that apart from being a highly trained and well respected developer,
that I'm
Hello,
when is TB minimized and I use RMB on systray icon for opening contect
menu, TB main window is restored with opening context menu.
Reported in https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6443
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 11:14:00 PM, you wrote:
I find it amusing that a very self important person wants TB!
You know what? I'm getting tired of the personal attacks. Usually when
that happens, its from people who feel inferior in the face of
adversity. So they compensate for their
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 11:14:03 PM, you wrote:
Hello Indie_Dev,
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I I'm going to either end up with several virtual folders or several
I different views with different sorting criteria. Seriously, whats
I worth all this hassle?
Then
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 9:44:19 PM, you wrote:
Indie_Dev wrote:
OK, lets try this again.
i knew you'll like it.
Those _same_ emails imported into the following WORK JUST FINE and
with NONE of this silliness that we're so hotly debating.
Outlook
Outlook Express
Windows Mail
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 12:40:11 AM, you wrote:
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
*snip*
I'm going to cite Walter Bright regarding something everybody was
doing differently:
As James Kanze explained on comp.lang.c++.moderated, DMC++ is correct
according to the Standard.
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 12:21:11 AM, you wrote:
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
I No, thats not what I'm implying. Lets try this again. Too bad we
I don't have access to a chalk board and a box of crayons because
I this is a classic classroom debate that can only be resolved
Hello all,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, Indie_Dev wrote:
TB is wrong. There is absolutely _no_ question about it. None. You
can't just have EVERY SINGLE email program EVER written, do it one
way, then TB! does it another way and then say that TB! is doing it
the correct way.
as I think,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 12:03:37 AM, you wrote:
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
To mimic the functionality of the attachment pane to the attachments
button it would have to be possible to choose any random set of files
for deletion because its one of the possible thing you can do
Hi TB Beta list members,
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers.
Indie_Dev has recently joined this forum and has injected a fervour to
a debate about the way TB! does things. Such input is to be welcomed.
It's refreshing to see something serious to discuss on
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 4:09:06 AM, you wrote:
Hello Indie_Dev,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 12:06:17 AM, you wrote:
And if I breached anonymity and told the list who I was, you'd know
that apart from being a highly trained and well respected developer,
that I'm probably the _last_ person
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 8:27:05 AM, you wrote:
Reply to message sent 08/22/2007, @ 17:06:17 (4:06 PM Locally)
~~~
Hello Indie_Dev,
And if I breached anonymity and told the list who I was, you'd know
that apart from being a
Indie_Dev wrote:
you just deaf or what?
Here we go again with the personal attacks. You pack guys must really
have fun in your group hug sessions.
you said you don't take personally any of this fly attractant.
make sure they're compliant, then fire up a bugreport with a couple of
Anyone know how to suppress the creation of these message.html files?
They're just litter and will only serve to increase the size of the
mailboxes over time.
--
Best regards,
Indie_Dev
Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA'
Anyone know how to suppress the creation of these message.html files?
They're just litter and will only serve to increase the size of the
mailboxes over time.
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
--
Best Regards,
Vilius Šumskas
LNK TV system administrator
mob.: +370 614
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 8:55:21 AM, you wrote:
*snip*
Ritlabs is a small - very small - team of developers. Other email
programs (apart from Pocomail) are written and supported by large
corporations and/or groups. Eudora is probably one of the oldest
ubiquitous email readers on the
Hello,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 3:12:32 PM, you wrote:
I Anyone know how to suppress the creation of these message.html files?
Preferences - Viewer/Editor - View HTML Messages View Messages with
alternative layout: choose Plain Text Version Only
I They're just litter and will only serve
Hello Marck,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 2:56:19 PM, you wrote:
MDP Indie_Dev is quite right in pointing out that (s)he is becoming the
MDP focus of some personal attacks.
,--/ based upon: \
| Life's too short and I only have a pair of tits which refuse to grow any
| bigger than my
Hello all,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, Indie_Dev wrote:
Ritlabs is a small - very small - team of developers. Other email
programs (apart from Pocomail) are written and supported by large
corporations and/or groups. Eudora is probably one of the oldest
ubiquitous email readers on the planet.
Hello Indie_Dev,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 4:07:25 PM, you wrote:
I agree with you. Again - and I've said this before - my opinion has
nothing to do with telling the devs how they should develop their
program. If they choose to do something one way and I can't deal with
it, well, thats what
Hi Marek,
on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:27:56 +0200GMT (23.08.2007, 14:27 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
MM Hello,
MM when is TB minimized and I use RMB on systray icon for opening contect
MM menu, TB main window is restored with opening context menu.
MM Reported in
Hello all,
In a different thread, someone wrote:
TB! handles email imports INCORRECTLY. Period. End of story.
If you have a couple of minutes to spare, I propose a little test or
game:
1.- Select a message from a previous date in any of your folders.
2.- Select Tools/Export messages to.. and
Hello George,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 16:55:24, you wrote:
In my previous mail I wrote that I found your points valid but there are also
counter points that are also valid! From The Bat's! behalf, the mail is
RECEIVED as long as it got into its database. Technically this is correct.
I like
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 9:14:56 AM, you wrote:
Anyone know how to suppress the creation of these message.html files?
They're just litter and will only serve to increase the size of the
mailboxes over time.
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
OK, I'm getting tired of your
Hello all,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
In my previous mail I wrote that I found your points valid but there are also
counter points that are also valid! From The Bat's! behalf, the mail is
RECEIVED as long as it got into its database. Technically this is correct.
I like the
Hello Maxim,
In the V4 we are changing the message index file format...
- Dangerous :)
- Please run a full beta cycle just for the new index format before
release.
- Will it be backwards compatible so that one can safely revert to a
previous version if needed?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
OK, I've files reports for every issue and quirk I've encountered and
which need looking at if the devs choose to do so.
0006451...0006444
--
cheers,
Indie_Dev
Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 9:39:08 AM, you wrote:
Hello,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 3:12:32 PM, you wrote:
I Anyone know how to suppress the creation of these message.html files?
Preferences - Viewer/Editor - View HTML Messages View Messages with
alternative layout: choose Plain Text
Hello Vilius
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
Anyone know how to suppress the creation of these message.html files?
They're just litter and will only serve to increase the size of the
mailboxes over time.
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
THAT is NOT a solution
--
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 9:45:04 AM, you wrote:
Hello Marck,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 2:56:19 PM, you wrote:
MDP Indie_Dev is quite right in pointing out that (s)he is becoming the
MDP focus of some personal attacks.
,--/ based upon: \
| Life's too short and I only have a pair
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 9:55:24 AM, you wrote:
Hello Indie_Dev,
*snip*
Very well said. However with the following lines it seems that we are moving
to a dangerous ground:
I'll mention it on my blog, it will get read - millions
and millions of times. Then everyone even thinking of
Hello Indie_dev,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 17:31:35, you wrote:
OK, I've files reports for every issue and quirk I've encountered and
which need looking at if the devs choose to do so.
0006451...0006444
Thank you very much! This is very useful!
--
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 10:08:05 AM, you wrote:
Hello George,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 16:55:24, you wrote:
In my previous mail I wrote that I found your points valid but there are also
counter points that are also valid! From The Bat's! behalf, the mail is
RECEIVED as long as it got
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 10:11:02 AM, you wrote:
Hello all,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
In my previous mail I wrote that I found your points valid but there are
also
counter points that are also valid! From The Bat's! behalf, the mail is
RECEIVED as long as it got into
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 9:14:56 AM, you wrote:
Anyone know how to suppress the creation of these message.html
files?
They're just litter and will only serve to increase the size of the
mailboxes over time.
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
OK, I'm getting tired
Hello Vilius
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
Anyone know how to suppress the creation of these message.html
files?
They're just litter and will only serve to increase the size of the
mailboxes over time.
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
THAT is NOT a
Hello Indie_dev,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 17:42:41, you wrote:
Thats good to know. But my question is, whats so hard about just
leaving the emails alone and importing them as-is? This is not about
sorting per se.
During import, if for some reason TB! needs to know when an email was
imported,
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
THAT is NOT a solution
Why?
Because HTML email is what is happening on the Internet these days and
for the past few years. Take a look at the number of customers THE BAT
has lost because it cannot deal effectively with HTML email, eithe
8/23/2007 11:02 AM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Because HTML email is what is happening on the Internet these days and
RG for the past few years. Take a look at the number of customers THE BAT
RG has lost because it cannot deal effectively with HTML email, eithe
RG viewing or
Hello Paul
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
Your response does not address the question of
removing message.html
No it doesn't. It deals with a suggestion to tell people NOT to send
HTML. HTML is here to stay.
As for spam, I have been getting PDFs. Should we stop using Acrobat?
SHould
So again, offering
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is what I was addressing
It is realistic. Most email for every business user comes from the people they
are working with. I personally configured ALL Outlook/OE clients in my
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
THAT is NOT a solution
Why?
Because HTML email is what is happening on the Internet these days and
for the past few years. Take a look at the number of customers THE BAT
has lost because it cannot deal effectively with HTML email,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 11:09:58 AM, you wrote:
8/23/2007 11:02 AM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Because HTML email is what is happening on the Internet these days and
RG for the past few years. Take a look at the number of customers THE BAT
RG has lost because it cannot
8/23/2007 11:39 AM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG ... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is what I was addressing
Can we agree that your dissertation on the merits of HTML did not
address the question? That is what I was addressing. I offered a
different point of view.
--
Hello Vilius
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
So again, offering
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is what I was addressing
It is realistic. Most email for every business user comes from the
people they are working with. I
Hello Vilius
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
SPAM is happening on the Internet these days too. Should we not fight it?
Sure, but fighting spam is a different issue. Most spam comes in HTML
format so it will at LEAST be presentable and sometimes for more
insidious reasons such as hiding
Hello Paul
RG ... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is
RG what I was addressing
Can we agree that your dissertation on the merits
of HTML did not
address the question? That is what I was
addressing. I offered a
different point of view.
Sure - I am getting tired of the fighting anyway. My
In several programs I use that will email their results (ACDSEE and Snagit for
instance) they have started failing with a MAPI error and in Snagit's case a
MAPI error 2.
I can no longer send files from these programs directly to the bat.
This is a change in behavior and something that broke
I can't pin this down. It happens often but not always. Sometimes
there is an attached index.html and sometimes not. Sometimes there is
a table, sometimes not
I will change an HTML composed or forwarded message to plain text and
the text will disappear. I can copy and paste it and the message
Hello Rick,
In several programs I use that will email their results (ACDSEE and
Snagit for instance) they have started failing with a MAPI error and in
Snagit's case a MAPI error 2.
I can no longer send files from these programs directly to the bat.
This is a change in behavior and
Hello MAU,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 5:05:20 PM, you wrote:
If you have a couple of minutes to spare, I propose a little test or
game:
Now look at the 'Received Date' of the 3 messages:
- The one imported from .msg should show the date/time of the import.
- What's the Received
Rick Grunwald wrote:
If you still disagree reformat your drive and install OS/2. After all
Bill Gates himself said it was the best operating system.
...the message we have here is the strong belief that OS/2 is the
platform for the 90s.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Hi Robert,
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 3:12:17 PM, you wrote:
on several spots in TB there is a select folders dialog (e.g. 'Select
folders' for Virtual folders and 'Use By' for View Mode).
It would be very handy if these dialogs were extended:
I agree the Use By screen is in particular need
Hello vitalie
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
Rick Grunwald wrote:
If you still disagree reformat your drive and
install OS/2. After all
Bill Gates himself said it was the best
operating system.
...the message we have here is the strong belief
that OS/2 is the
platform for the
Hello MAU
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
Hello Rick,
In several programs I use that will email their
results (ACDSEE and
Snagit for instance) they have started failing
with a MAPI error and in Snagit's case a MAPI
error 2.
I can no longer send files from these programs
directly
I can no longer send files from these programs
directly to the bat.
This is a change in behavior and something that
broke during the past couple of Betas
---
Windows Internet Explorer
---
Could not perform this operation because the default
8/23/2007 4:25 PM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Outlook Express is now the unchangeable default. Something is broke! :'(
Maybe it is all that HTML mail? 8-]}
--
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Rick Grunwald wrote:
If you still disagree reformat your drive and
install OS/2. After all
Bill Gates himself said it was the best
operating system.
...the message we have here is the strong belief
that OS/2 is the
platform for the 90s.
I think he said that in the late 80s
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 10:50:16 AM, you wrote:
Hello Indie_dev,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 17:42:41, you wrote:
Thats good to know. But my question is, whats so hard about just
leaving the emails alone and importing them as-is? This is not about
sorting per se.
During import, if for some
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 11:09:58 AM, you wrote:
8/23/2007 11:02 AM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Because HTML email is what is happening on the Internet these days and
RG for the past few years. Take a look at the number of customers THE BAT
RG has lost because it cannot
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 11:36:14 AM, you wrote:
So again, offering
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is what I was addressing
It is realistic. Most email for every business user comes from the
people they are working with. I
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 11:43:28 AM, you wrote:
8/23/2007 11:39 AM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG ... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is what I was addressing
Can we agree that your dissertation on the merits of HTML did not
address the question? That is what I was
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 11:37:48 AM, you wrote:
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
THAT is NOT a solution
Why?
Because HTML email is what is happening on the Internet these days and
for the past few years. Take a look at the number of customers THE BAT
has lost
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 2:56:22 PM, you wrote:
Hello vitalie
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
Rick Grunwald wrote:
If you still disagree reformat your drive and
install OS/2. After all
Bill Gates himself said it was the best
operating system.
...the message we have here is
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 3:49:15 PM, you wrote:
I can no longer send files from these programs
directly to the bat.
This is a change in behavior and something that
broke during the past couple of Betas
---
Windows Internet Explorer
---
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
If I sent you an email in 1996 and it stayed on your ISP mail
server until today how should it appear on email client? With
today's date or 1996?
I I was importing emails from my local drive that was _already_
I downloaded. Its not on
Hello Paul
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
8/23/2007 4:25 PM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Outlook Express is now the unchangeable
RG default. Something is broke! :'(
Maybe it is all that HTML mail? 8-]}
Are you confirming or not?
--
Rick
The Bat Version
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Don't say it wrong because it not! It seems that you didn't understand
what I meant.
I Hey, its wrong to _me_. So of course I can say its wrong.
But it's not.
I functionality of the 'attachment display' has nothing to do with
I 'randomnesss' since the
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
and this should be a warranty of anything? Such big corporations manytimes
tries do their own standards and waits, if others will use it or not.
I The point I was making is that larger companies will tend to be more
I in compliance of standards (e.g. RFC)
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 it appears that MAU
wrote the following in regards to MAPI error 2:
[snip] I can no longer send files from these programs directly to the bat.
This is a change in behavior and something that broke during the past couple
of Betas
Confirm anyone?
M Yes, with
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
I'm going to cite Walter Bright regarding something everybody was
doing differently:
As James Kanze explained on comp.lang.c++.moderated, DMC++ is
correct according to the Standard. However, nobody else does it
that way, and the Standard is
Hello all,
Friday, August 24, 2007, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
M Yes, with 3.99.21 and ACDSee Pro. No problem with 3.99.06.
MAU, Is 3.99.06 available somewhere?
here for example:
http://www.thebat.cz/stazeni/beta/tb39906.rar (4 MB)
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
Hello Rick,
On 2007-08-23 you wrote:
In several programs I use that will email their results (ACDSEE and
Snagit for instance) they have started failing with a MAPI error and in
Snagit's case a MAPI error 2.
Confirm anyone?
No problem with ACDSee Pro and 3.99.08.
--
Regards,
Uwe
Using
Sveiki,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 11:37:48 AM, you wrote:
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
THAT is NOT a solution
Why?
Because HTML email is what is happening on the Internet these days and
for the past few years. Take a look at the number of customers THE BAT
Sveiki,
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 11:36:14 AM, you wrote:
So again, offering
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is what I was addressing
It is realistic. Most email for every business user comes from the
people they are working
Goncalo Farias wrote on 24/08/2007 at 08:41:23 +1100
subject Interface Inconsistencies :
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
If I sent you an email in 1996 and it stayed on your ISP mail
server until today how should it appear on email client? With
today's date or 1996?
I I
Hello Vilius
Who said that it's ACCEPTABLE? I understand HTML
when people send
commercial newsletters or official goverment
letters, but when every
folk on a planet uses HTML only to send a message
in red (or whatever)
just to say Hello, how are you? it is
unacceptable and stupid. It
Indie_Dev wrote on 23/08/2007 at 10:59:47 +1100
subject Interface Inconsistencies :
Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 7:30:15 PM, you wrote:
Hi Zygmunt,
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, at 22:45:03 [GMT +0200] (which was 22:45 where I live)
you wrote about: 'Interface Inconsistencies'
[...] The Bat! knows
I posted a description of a gpg signing error on the TB forum today
and it was suggested that the latest beta fixed this. Is it
available for me to try?
Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Benson wrote on 24/08/2007 at 11:23:54 +1100
subject beta fixes GnuPG bug :
I posted a description of a gpg signing error on the TB forum today
and it was suggested that the latest beta fixed this. Is it
available for me to try?
The latest beta is available bere:
Here is the thread that I was referring to re the bug being fixed
in beta: http://www.ritlabs.com/en/forum/read.php?FID=4TID=5019
I'm using 3.99.3
Using GnuPG trying to sign a message. I answer the prompt for my
password. A dos box opens for gpg.exe but nothing happens beyond
that.
8/23/2007 10:06 PM
Hi Vilius,
On 8/23/2007 Vilius Šumskas wrote:
VŠ Who said that it's ACCEPTABLE? I understand HTML when people send
VŠ commercial newsletters or official goverment letters, but when every
VŠ folk on a planet uses HTML only to send a message in red (or whatever)
VŠ just to say
8/23/2007 10:09 PM
Hi Rick,
On 8/23/2007 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG It doesn't matter if it
RG 1) Takes more bandwidth
RG 2) Takes more processor power
RG 3) Is unacceptable and stupid
RG 4) Made default by Microsoft
RG THAT IS THE WAY IT IS WHETHER OR NOT WE LIKE IT!!
Only for the people
Indie_Dev wrote on 24/08/2007 at 01:08:44 +1100
subject Suppressing the message.html file :
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 9:14:56 AM, you wrote:
Anyone know how to suppress the creation of these message.html files?
They're just litter and will only serve to increase the size of the
mailboxes
Indie_Dev wrote on 24/08/2007 at 08:19:35 +1100
subject Suppressing the message.html file :
Actually, thats not true. I just updated my report because mine are
not getting deleted even when I manually delete delete and answer the
prompt. Yes, I am using .21 Build (is .22 out yet btw?)
They
Rick Grunwald wrote on 24/08/2007 at 02:56:15 +1100
subject Suppressing the message.html file :
Hello Vilius
On Thursday, August 23, 2007 you wrote:
So again, offering
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is what I was addressing
It
Indie_Dev wrote on 24/08/2007 at 08:21:34 +1100
subject Suppressing the message.html file :
Thursday, August 23, 2007, 11:36:14 AM, you wrote:
So again, offering
Instruct your colleagues NOT to send HTML email.
... is Not helpful nor realistic. That is what I was addressing
It is
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
