Re: 3.0.9.5 Return is now available

On 11/3/2005 8:15 PM, I wrote: > >Exactly. > >> Work-around: message list -> RMB -> Attachments -> pick what you need. > > > That's not a workaround here since only the 'Save As' option > works when all I wish to do most of the time is to simply > view the attachment without having to save it t

Re: 3.0.9.5 Return is now available

On Friday, March 11, 2005 at 7:54:56 PM [GMT -0500], Peter Ouwehand wrote: > Exactly. > Work-around: message list -> RMB -> Attachments -> pick what you need. That's not a workaround here since only the 'Save As' option works when all I wish to do most of the time is to simply view the attachment

Re: 3.0.9.5 Return is now available

On Friday, March 11, 2005 at 4:28:52 PM [GMT -0500], Matt Thoene wrote: > Allie...what was the attachment issue you were having? > Just want to confirm it here. My button works, (add a file > window opens, attachment is added) and the attachment > seems to get sent. > I've a

Re: 3.0.9.5 Return is now available

rn much difference in behaviour here. Any specifics that I should be looking out for? -- Allie -=-=- ... I had a life once... now I have a computer and a modem. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.9.4 R

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.4 Return (pre-beta) is now available

ver, I don't see the message content request appear and remain until the message body loads. -- -=[ Allie ]=- ... I hit the CTRL key but I'm still not in control! __ Running TB! v3.0.9.4 Return or ThunderBird v1 IMAP Server:

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.4 Return (pre-beta) is now available

On Thursday, March 10, 2005, at 04:37 AM, 9Val wrote: > Sorry, my fault, I wanted to know if you see the message content > request in IMAP queue (from Connection Centre, not from logs). I'll be looking out for that. I just read some mail and didn't encounter the problem

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.4 Return (pre-beta) is now available

Hi 9Val, On 9/3/2005 10:02 AM, you wrote: > Have you checked if there are correct requests to server? Or it simply > doesn't try to download them? You're asking me hard questions here. :) I don't know how to make the difference between a correct and incorrect request. I don't know. Set up anoth

Re: IMAP: AV's while emptying folder cache

Hi 9Val, On 9/3/2005 10:01 AM, you wrote: > Can't reproduce I've emptied folder caches many times since then and not seen it happen again. -- _ _ _ __ __ __ _| | (_)___ | \/ | / _` | | | / -_) | |\/| | \__,_|_|_|_\___|_|_| |_| |___| -=-=- On a radiator repair s

Re: IMAP: Problems with connection on running test

Hi 9Val, On 9/3/2005 5:26 AM, you wrote: > Problem is not only in server, but in collaboration with such > server. As I wrote before, only server I know which > correctly supports multiple connections is BatPost. It allows > access to the same mailbox from simultaneous connections wit

Re: 3.0.9.4: Vertical scroll bar misalignment

Hi MAU, On 8/3/2005 7:00 AM, you wrote: > I am sure many of you have seen that sometimes the message list pane, or > the account/folder tree doesn't seem to scroll properly. This is what I > have verified. Behaviour confirmed. I was wondering what was causing the problem. -- _ _ _

IMAP: Problems with connection on running test

Hi all, There's a 'test' button beside the IMAP tuning option on how many connections to the server are allowed. I ran the test at home and it was fine. No problems found. However, when I ran the test at work multiple times, TB! said some of the connections failed and that there may be a problem

Re: Micro Ed Quirk

On Sunday, March 06, 2005 at 11:49:44 PM [GMT -0500], Jonathan Angliss wrote: > Take this message as an example. I'm filling in some space > here so you can use it as an example. Make sure your > template puts %CURSOR after the body, not sure if that has > any affect on the outcome or not, so it m

View Plain Text view menu option buggy

Hi all, I use the RTV by default. When I go to the View Menu and select 'Use Plain Text Viewer', nothing happens except that the option is 'ticked' in the menu. I select the option on the menu again. The PTV is used, but the menu option is now unticked. From then on, the menu option is indicating

Block Selection modes not working in MicroEd

Hi all, The different block mode selection types aren't working here in MicroEd. It seems to be stuck in the default block selection mode. -- _ _ _ __ __ | IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.9.4 Return __ _| | (_)___ | \/ | |IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro / _` | | | / -_) | |\/| | |

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.4 Return (pre-beta) is now available

On Sunday, March 06, 2005 at 8:50:51 PM [GMT -0500], Greg Strong wrote: > I couldn't even start TB v3.0.9.4. See PNG file attached. I'm back > to v3.0.2.10. Looks like your TB! shortcut doesn't have the 'Start In' directory defined. If you don't define that directory, then TB! will crash at

Re: Switching "views" causes AVs

On Sunday, March 06, 2005 at 4:13:08 PM [GMT -0500], Jonathan Angliss wrote: > This is mildly annoying. I normally prefer to view my > message lists in a threaded mode, however times pop up > where I will decide that I want to view just a straight > forward list, date sorted. So I flip between the

Search panel - List Index out of Bounds

Hi all, If I open the message finder and do a message search, I get a 'List Index Out of Bounds' error on closing the panel. The error occurs everytime. -- ... . | IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.9.4 Return _.||* _ |\/| |IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro (_]|||(/,| | | OS: W

Re: Addressbook Issues

On Sunday, March 06, 2005 at 4:35:02 PM [GMT -0500], Jonathan Angliss wrote: > I noticed a small issue when I loaded 3.0.9.3 the other > day. My addressbook had gone missing. Actually not really > gone missing, but wasn't loaded. Was talking with Allie at > the time, and he su

IMAP: Message list corruption

Hi all, I just moved a message from one folder to another and a popup message appeared saying that there TB! couldn't rebuild the index for the source folder. I restarted TB! and saw that there were old messages being listed as new, i.e., having only a time listed, implying that they arrived toda

Re: Attachment button no longer works

On Saturday, March 05, 2005 at 6:13:22 PM [GMT -0500], Matt Thoene wrote: > Now that you mention it, if I try to change from pane view to button > view, nothing happens. It is checked, but it is still stuck in pane > view. It would seem that whatever view you were using, you're stuck in. I was us

Re: Micro Ed Quirk

On Saturday, March 05, 2005 at 11:47:51 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Cuddy wrote: > In Reply.gif you can see what this message looked like > when I selected the reply button for this message. I then > selected the visible text,with the exception of my > signature and deleted it. I then see Delete.gif.

IMAP: AV's while emptying folder cache

Hi all, I just attempted emptying a folder's cache. What resulted is a spectacularly fast cascade of unending AV's. The sound that goes with the AV popup stuttered madly until I killed TB!. On restart, it would seem that the cache was in fact emptied since the index was rebuilt etc. -- ..

Re: 3.0.9.4: Message list font wrong at start-up

On Saturday, March 05, 2005 at 7:29:49 AM [GMT -0500], Miguel Urech wrote: > When I start 3.0.9.4 the Message list is _always_ displayed with the > wrong font anf size. Selecting Options/Preferences (without changing > anything) and clicking OK brings the right font and size... until TB is > start

Re: Attachment button no longer works

On Saturday, March 05, 2005 at 7:19:03 AM [GMT -0500], Boris Anders wrote: > Button? Which button? *search* You can switch from viewing attachments in the pane that's in the viewer and just have them reduced to a menu list, invoked via a button in the header bar. > If you mean, that View - Attac

Re: IMAP?

On Saturday, March 05, 2005 at 6:50:27 AM [GMT -0500], Allie_M wrote: > You could give it a go since I'm using it here quite > comfortably. The things that are in my way now aren't IMAP > specific as far as I can tell, though the non-responding > attachments button may be an IMAP thing. Oh. I for

Re: IMAP?

On Saturday, March 05, 2005 at 5:46:33 AM [GMT -0500], Tony Boom wrote: > Allie, is it safe to try IMAP yet? > Off to see a Meatloaf show later so I may try it > tomorrow... After the GP that is and also if you think > it's safe to dip a toe in the turbulent waters of IMAP. Yo

Attachment button no longer works

Hi all, I'm having a problem here. I normally do not display my attachments using the pane view. I use the button. However, now, I can't view attachments unless the internal viewer supports them. That attachment button doesn't respond to clicks and attempting to change to another method of displa

Re: Filter not updated when account name changes

On Thursday, February 10, 2005 at 2:19:11 AM [GMT -0500], Thorvald Neumann wrote: > But the filters do not get updated with this new foldername, when the > target folder resides inside the current account. An oldie, but baddie. :/ Confirmed a long time ago in a .. -- ... . |

Re: TB! 3.0.9.4 not startable!

On Friday, March 04, 2005 at 10:52:33 PM [GMT -0500], Msrourke wrote: > I found that if you use your existing shortcut (from your > previous version) in the XP start menu TB! will not start. > However if you go to Explorer and double click on > thebat.exe it starts fine. Why? I haven't figured tha

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.4 Return (pre-beta) is now available

On Saturday, March 05, 2005 at 12:54:15 AM [GMT -0500], Matt Thoene wrote: > Still cannot change who the email is from in a > reply/forward. I used to be able to right click on the > account identifier in the bottom info area of a reply or > forward window and select one of my other accounts. > I

Re: The Bat! 3.0.9.4 Return (pre-beta) is now available

On Friday, March 04, 2005 at 1:50:53 PM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote: > [*] UI : New thread sorting collaboration with new message list What does this mean? Anyone? > [-] IMAP: not downloaded messages use grayed icons Much better. > [-] IMAP: some message downloading fixes This may very well have

Re: 3.0.9.3 Pre-Beta is now available

ame in and were auto-filtered just fine. I'll have to watch that some more though. I hope you're right and that the autofiltering problem would be indirectly fixed. -- Allie -=-=- ... Never use a preposition to end a sentence w

Re: Message list sorting problem better defined

9Val wrote: > Can't reproduce, Shucks. I was hoping you wouldn't say that. :/ > both in main window and in folder view. Any other > suggestions? I'll be looking for more specifics. Clearly there's something special about my setup that triggers the problem. It&

Re: Alt-Click bizzarities

On Friday, March 04, 2005 at 8:41:55 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Hemming wrote: > Every day's a school day isn't it? I didn't know you could do that! > Mind you, I had a bit of a panic when mI couldn't work out how to get > back to the full list, but I'm sorted now. The key works well there in case y

Re: Message flag icons partially displayed

On Friday, March 04, 2005 at 8:14:30 AM [GMT -0500], Kevin Menard wrote: > Agreed. I've been using Entourage more often lately on my > PowerBook, and while it has its annoyances, I've been > pretty happy with the way it handles a lot of things, > including IMAP. In my search for an IMAP solution,

Alt-Click bizzarities

Hi all, I just used one of my favourite ways of finding a particular and recent message from someone. I hold the alt button down as I click on the name in the message list. Only messages from that individual is shown in the list. With this prebeta, only two of the messages were displayed. I know

Re: 3.0.9.3 Pre-Beta is now available

On Friday, March 04, 2005 at 5:59:34 AM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote: > Does clear cache help? No, but a simple message reload does. It just happened with one of my own messages in this TBBETA folder. Would you still like the tbi and tbb files for it? How do I know which is which though, since the

Re: Editor issues with the current Pre-beta 3.0.9.3

On Friday, March 04, 2005 at 7:57:37 AM [GMT -0500], Boris Anders wrote: > No. Phew! I was feeling bad already, so that's good news. :) > But maybe it's a hint to developers ;-). I prefer that one. It was certainly a pleasure clicking on those mids and seeing the message bodies appear in a new

Re: Message flag icons partially displayed

On Friday, March 04, 2005 at 7:43:22 AM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote: > Hmm, it is my fault, half-messages appear only for IMAP > users. They mean, that message body wasn't downloaded yet. Aha... so it's deliberate. :))) An interesting and welcome concept/addition! I'd personally prefer some other ch

Re: Editor issues with the current Pre-beta 3.0.9.3

On Friday, March 04, 2005 at 7:47:59 AM [GMT -0500], Boris Anders wrote: > Think this is the same like in > or > or > . Yes, I soon saw. Is this a read the archives hint? :) -- ... . | IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v

Message list sorting problem better defined

Hi all, Ok. I've managed to discern the pattern to the folder view confirmation requests. The problem seems to be this: If I move from one folder using a particular folder view mode and go to another folder using another view mode, this newly selected folder will have the previous folders view m

Message flag icons partially displayed

Hi all, Take a look at the small pic. Anyone else seeing that? The little folder icons are only partially displayed in many instances in the message list. Widening the column doesn't help either. -- ... . | IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.9.3 Pre-Beta _.||* _ |\/| |IMAP Ser

Editor issues with the current Pre-beta 3.0.9.3

Hi all, I hit the new message button to create a new message and the editor appeared with no toolbars or menu lists. Just the header fields, text body field and status bar. I didn't get the bars back until I restarted TB!. Hitting Shift-CTRL-F doesn't toggle autoformat, but instead, brings up the

Re: 3.0.9.3 Pre-Beta is now available

On Friday, March 04, 2005 at 5:59:34 AM [GMT -0500], 9val wrote: > Does clear cache help? It's sort of sporadic. The next time I encounter it, I'll try that. Not that I'm particularly happy with this since deleting the cache of 2500 over a slow connection is no pleasant task since I now have to w

Re: 3.0.9.3 Pre-Beta is now available

On Wednesday, March 02, 2005 at 4:37:19 PM [GMT -0500], Allie_M wrote: > Let's keep the fingers crossed. If this works, then TB! may > very well work a lot better at work. Wrong message body being displayed for selected message is still very much a problem here. :( Ah well. -- ..

Re: 3.0.9.3 Pre-Beta is now available

On Wednesday, March 02, 2005 at 2:10:18 PM [GMT -0500], Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > Fixes are made for: > IMAP So far so interestingly good. No interrupted connections, forcing a restart yet, and I managed to browse all new mail in the thread that followed your announcement. Let's keep the f

Re: 3.0.9.1 Pre-Beta is now available

Tony Boom wrote: > So is it now safe for me to try IMAP without all the horrors of the past? Nope. Just tried it here at work. It got busy updating the folders, but soon stalled. I restarted and got a 'disconnected from server' message. I didn't get a read a single new message after 10 minutes

Re: 3.0.9.2 Pre-Beta attachments

Ethan J. Mings wrote: > It will *not* start up on my machine. > > I guess I'll have to wait until the next beta. For your TB! shortcut, go in its properties and ensure that the 'Start in' path entry field isn't blank. It should contain the path to the installation directory. -- .__ .__

Re: html whitelist wish

Hi Leif Gregory, On 27/2/2005 11:59 AM, you wrote: > Remember Opera? They refused to improperly render HTML pages due to > sloppy markup. They caught flack over it for sure, but they stuck > to their guns. They're still very popular. The only reason Opera has remained popular is that it works.

Re: html whitelist wish

Hi Paul, On 27/2/2005 6:21 AM, you wrote: > Very well said! Yeah. A good technical argument rather than all the other philosophical and hyped ones that I had seen until then. OTOH, one wonders, why implement anything at all then if we look at it in that depressingly unsurmountable all-or-none f

Re: html whitelist wish

Hi Tony Boom, On 26/2/2005 3:50 PM, you wrote: > Seriously though, I don't care either way as long as this list > don't get bombarded with floods of html. I know html isn't allowed > on here but that's not going to stop people is it. TB! has been capable of constructing and sending HTML mail sin

Re: html whitelist wish

Hi Tony Boom, On 26/2/2005 3:03 PM, you wrote: > I'm going to make one last comment on this subject. For years most > people on this list have in the past voiced *very* strong opinions > about keeping The Bat html free... Where are they all now? They've > all jumped ship and are now sitting firml

Re: html whitelist wish

Hi Tony Boom, On 26/2/2005 3:12 PM, you wrote: > 3 months time, The Bat has the best html engine of any email client > available... It will likely not have that. Not for a long time .. even if it is planned. > Still no working flawless IMAP ability but great > comic book features. Hands up al

Re: html whitelist wish

NetVicious wrote: > The perfect option will be a button or something to load the images of > the current mail. And this should be made manually every time. ... and this is ThunderBird's current offering and one that I agree with. Of course, if one feels that a particular address is unlikely to be

Re: html whitelist wish

Hi Paul Van Noord, On 25/2/2005 8:18 PM, you wrote: > Speak for yourself. Those I work with are using Opera and have some > instruction in responsible internet usage. It in their ignorance that > most problems occur. In a majority of cases the images in the HTML > messages I receive are superfluo

Re: html whitelist wish

Hi Tony Boom, On 25/2/2005 3:37 PM, you wrote: > Have you ever thought to double click the html attachment to see what > happens? Oh look, the browser opens and there's your html newsletter > complete with all those pretty pictures... Don't tell me your too lazy to > double click a mouse button?

Re: the bat! new wishes !!!

Hi Avi Yashar, On 17/02/2005 07:44 AM, you wrote: > No doubt if I do go to IMAP, I will use TB as my client. Quite > honestly, I am less concerned about the bugs in the bat than just the > simple mechanics of the move. I don't like flying blind. IMAP's workings are largely seamless. Your actio

Re: TB! and IMAP stability (was:Re: the bat! new wishes !!!)

On Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 6:51:29 AM [GMT -0500], Marcus Ohlström wrote: > Speaking of TB! and IMAP, I have myself considered switching to > IMAP, but I am quite afraid of the reports of mailboxes emptying > themselves. IIRC, you Allie has stumbled across this showstopper at &g

Re: the bat! new wishes !!!

On Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 9:54:20 PM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote: > Allie, I've been a lurker on this thread, because I've toyed with > the idea of going to IMAP for a long while now. But I've always been > put off by all of the complaints I read about IMAP

Re: the bat! new wishes !!!

On Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 2:32:03 AM [GMT -0500], Goncalo Farias wrote: > That would be really useful if you had an unlimited size for your > IMAP mailbox. That never the case! Since I run my own IMAP server, this *is* the case for me. The server runs on my working machine here at home. I

Re: the bat! new wishes !!!

On Thursday, February 17, 2005 at 2:41:09 AM [GMT -0500], Goncalo Farias wrote: > If you're not using your computer you can't really be sure that > you'll have access to a mail client with IMAP, are you? > Most mainstream e-mail clients support IMAP. Even Outlook Express does. :) > Furthermor

Re: the bat! new wishes !!!

On Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 5:30:39 PM [GMT -0500], Cees wrote: > I love the way you can explain things, you're very good at that! Thanks bud! That's encouraging! > But.. to me this sounds just like the feature to "not delete > messages at the server", so that you can indeed access y

Re: the bat! new wishes !!!

On Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 4:31:52 PM [GMT -0500], Cees wrote: > I NEVER understood the use or advantage of IMAP in the first place. > Why doesn't everybody just stick to POP3. In a nutshell, IMAP allows you to seamlessly manage your mail from multiple machines. Despite working from diffe

Re: the bat! new wishes !!!

On Wednesday, February 16, 2005 at 12:24:55 PM [GMT -0500], Claude Renaud wrote: >Sorry, it is not my fault. > I noticed this too, but I did not send messge since two days. Is there a very bad echo in here?? :) Very likely a message stuck in an IMAP outbox. Switch your IMAP outbox to local.

Re: the next beta ? when ?

Hi Alexander S. Kunz, On 15/02/2005 11:39 AM, you wrote: > What difference would it make? SMTP talks to another SMTP on port 25, just > like TB talks to an SMTP on port 25. It wouldn't make any difference. Stuart is likely within an intranet that allows outbound connections only via the web on

Re: the next beta ? when ?

Hi MAU, On 15/02/2005 10:20 AM, you wrote: > I assume you are familiar with this link, aren't you? > > http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/ No, I'm not. -- .__.... . [__]||* _ |\/| | (/,| | Keyboard? How quaint! - Scotty signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 9:07:59 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote: > I see that Allie's filter is now doing a better job of trimming your > sig. So, finally, what do you think of my suggestion about forgoing > the PGP when sending messages to the list? If that is possible, then > your mess

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 8:56:59 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Hemming wrote: > Exactly right. If I did have direct access I could get away with using > GMail or the like. I'm sure that few employees would be fans of such a disclaimer being tagged to all messages they sent. They'd naturally wish

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 8:17:18 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Hemming wrote: AM>> I have this sneaky feeling that Stuart's company sysadmins know about AM>> me and what I've been doing with his messages to the list. > Do you think they're watching us now? Spooky! I do wonder. They're snickering

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 8:14:54 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart Hemming wrote: > Let's see, shall we... > Testing, testing. One, two, three. Can you hear me at the back? There goes my theory that I wouldn't need to restart MDaemon to use the updated cfilters.dat. I have to manually edit it for t

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:56:50 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote: > Sorry if I have given you any extra work, Allie. But happy to see that > "I cue" once in a while. Good catch. :) Let's hope the filter works better, now that I've adjusted it. -- ..

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:49:42 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote: > Thanks, Allie. I'm glad to get my confused head straightened out once > more. I just adjusted the filters. What happened is that they have actually *added* more to the disclaimer. Incredible!! It's now

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:31:29 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote: > Stuart, didn't you mean Marck's server here? Stuart still sends his list messages through me. :) I've been using my server to remove the lines of his sig disclaimer. I may just take this queue to adjust the filters again.

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:08:43 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote: > Whoa Nelly! I didn't realize that I was only seeing the tip of the > iceberg. I guess that gives me another thing to be thankful to Allie > for. I have this sneaky feeling that Stuart's company sysa

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 8:48:19 AM [GMT -0500], Mark Partous wrote: > Well, at least, one good thing came out of this thread: I 've > learned a new word... LOL. Good for you. :) If only that initial question was left alone, as it should have. If it's ignored then, it will not be asked a

Re: the next beta ? when ?

On Sunday, February 13, 2005 at 6:40:06 AM [GMT -0500], Dierk Haasis wrote: > Aaargh! > Why the heck does this idiotic discussion come up every few weeks? ... and I'm sitting here thinking, why these all too predictable and IMO, idiotic type responses appear to legitimate queries when so muc

Re: Bug in "Quote Name Limit"?

On Sunday, January 23, 2005 at 7:44:33 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar wrote: > Allie, it seems to do both. Although with the rules you describe > below, I am not sure any more. My assumption was that if I set a quote > name limit of 4, then the maximum number of characters that I should &

Re: Bug in "Quote Name Limit"?

; quoted text - lines begin without the quoted initials prefix. This may be as a result of your having 'smart wrapping' enabled. Disable 'smartwrapping' should cure this. You could also increase your quote name limit. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Nostalgia isn't what it u

Re: Update on the Status of Software

Hi Mary Bull, On 18/01/2005 09:02 AM, you wrote: > Other needs--and wishes--by TB! users are, I am confident, being > addressed in the same way, quietly, behind the scenes. I have seen > comments by Allie Martin, for instance, from time to time, about the > work he is helping with

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source))

sider to be or not to be a big deal may differ. If it's not a big deal then just adjust the signature and move on, rather than getting upset. :) Now it's my turn to invite you not to reply. ;) -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . S met ing's hap ening t my k ybo rd . .

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source))

On Sunday, January 09, 2005 at 5:22:50 AM [GMT -0500], Goncalo Farias wrote: > It's fixed now. Not really, since when the message contains multiple sig delimiters, TB! will recognize only the last one. :) -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . He who sitteth on an upturned tack shall sur

Re: IMAP: Filtering

check the logs next time around. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- The meek shall inherit the earth, if that's OK with you smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information:

Re: IMAP: Filtering

ssages I read at another location. I find that silly. - I can't trigger sounds for specific messages without having to make dedicated folder. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Oxymoron: Working Vacation. «·» IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.2.5 IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro ·

Re: IMAP: Filtering

ss book entries. Anyway, my point here was to report the problem. Not so much to look for a work-around. I can do full server side filtering if I wish. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Old poets never die, they just ride off into the sonnet. «·» IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.

IMAP: Filtering

behind. You filter again, the one remains. Filter again and finally, it is moved. Anyone else seeing this? -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Don't be so humble, you're not that great. -Golda Meir «·» IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.2.5 IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro · OS:

Linux userbase (Was: Re: Status Report on the Christmas Edition of The Bat)

7;s compiled. I was wondering how it took so long for this to come up. :) For TBOT'ers, here's the link to the figures Dave is referring to: http://counter.li.org/reports/place.php -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Oxymoron: Virtual Reality. «·» IMAP Client: The

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

On Sunday, December 19, 2004 at 8:19:25 AM [GMT -0500], Marck D Pearlstone wrote: > Okay - I fibbed. I found one in the GTK subsystem, installed for The > GIMP. Will this now work? Yes, it did. :) -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . 43rd Law of Computing: Anything that can

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

ct character translations. > Hopefully either The Bat, GPG, or both will be fixed soon, then we'll > be able to use libiconv properly. Yes. Thanks for the explanation. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . People are always available for work in the past tense. «·

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

of GnuPG. Are we breaking something else by deleting this dll? -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . I am in total control, but don't tell my wife. «·» IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.2.5 IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro · OS: Windows XP Pro (Service Pack 2) smime.p7s Description:

Re: problems with GnuPG v1.3.90 (MingW32)

oon. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- Oxymoron: Smart Bomb. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register a

Re: How Do I Keep IMAP From Connecting?

tion 'When online, Refresh folders every -- minutes. That should cure the problem. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- Fraud(n): A telephone number starting with 1-900 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Current beta is 3.0.2.10

Re: Annual fee or pay for major releases?

ivate Disk - encrypted virtual disk technology BatPost! - mailserver TinyWeb The Bat! Web A lot of products there. :) -- Cheers, -= Allie =- Fraud(n): A telephone number starting with 1-900 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Sign

Re: IMAP Issues

he selected message was duplicated. Leaving and returning to the folder, got rid of the duplicate in the list. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . Always glad to share my ignorance - I've got plenty. «·» IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.2.8 · ThunderBird v0.9 IMAP Server: MDaemon P

Re: IMAP Issues

These attributes are stored server side, so they should be identical irregardless of the client you're using. Personally, I'm having problems with the connection going funny and messages simply refusing to load. I usually have to leave the folder and return to it so that the mess

Corrupted message base - cannot choose not to repair

, but TB! would not accept this choice with the pop-up remaining. I eventually killed TB! and deleted the .tbb file which was rebuilt on the restart. -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . I'm not tense, just terribly A*L*E*R*T!! «·» IMAP Client: The Bat!™ v3.0.2.8 · ThunderB

Re: The Bat! 3.0.2.8 is now available

mportant developmental step. I applaud this. :) I was actually using ThunderBird pretty much exclusively for the last week or more. I'll be using TB! exclusively again to see how it goes. -- -=[ Allie ]=- ... Variables won't; constants aren't. ___

Re: IMAP Auto Filtering...

dated to reflect the change. Did you make any trivial changes as this? How does manual filtering go for you? Does that work? -- -= Allie Martin =- ==/==/==/==Police tagline==/==/==Do not cross ==/==/==/== IMAP Clients: ThunderBird v0.9

Re: test gmail retr

over dedicated port (TLS)' which is the same as SSL. The port number is changed to reflect the standard port used for SSL over POP/IMAP. -- Cheers, -= Allie Martin =- I'm not smart enough to lie - Ronald Reagan __ IMAP Clients: The

Re: test gmail retr

Paul Van Noord wrote: When will The Bat! be able to use a SSL server?? TB! is able to do POP or IMAP over SSL. It has been capable for a while. -- Cheers, -= Allie Martin =- I think not, said Descartes, and promptly disappeared. IMAP Clients: The Bat! v3.0.2.5 | ThunderBird v0.9 IMAP Server

Test message

Hi all, Just a test. Ignore if you can. :) -- -=[ Allie ]=- ... Nostalgia isn't what it used to be. __ Running TB! v3.0.2.2 Rush or SquirrelMail WebMail for IMAP IMAP Server: MDaemon Pro | OS: Windows XP Pro (Service P

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >