On Wed 13-Jul-05 12:52am -0500, alien wrote:
Wednesday, July 13, 2005, 12:23:23 AM, you wrote:
I posted my test filter - just paste it in you incoming
mail filter (right click on Incoming mail and choose
paste) and change the destination of the move.
Ok, tried that and it didn't work for
On Mon 11-Jul-05 8:45am -0500, alien wrote:
I'm trying to detect emails that have hidden http links to dangerous
files (scr, exe, etc) in HTML documents . Here are two examples:
ahref=http://host144dnx.plugin.com/foto007.scr;http://www.fee.com/docs/fotos/Loren.jpg/a/font/font/p
On Tue 12-Jul-05 3:33pm -0500, alien wrote:
Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 1:09:51 PM, Bill McCarthy wrote:
(?s)http://.*\.(?:scr|exe|etc)
If that fails you, could you send one of those messages
as an attachment?
Unfortunately it didn't work either
I received your two emails. That above regex
On Tue 12-Jul-05 9:49pm -0500, alien wrote:
Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 9:11:09 PM, you wrote:
You apparently are doing something strange :-)
That's actually comforting to know, at least the hard RegExp part is
out of the way ;-)
I tripled checked my filter and can't see anything obviously
On Wed 2-Jul-03 10:37am -0400, Carsten Thönges wrote:
No. I think it is wrong. The Reply-To address does not necessarily
belong to the sender.
Wrong may a bit strong. The message to which I'm replying has you in
the From: line - you wrote it. It has tbtech in the Reply-To: line.
Tbtech was
On Tue 24-Jun-03 4:08pm -0400, David Elliott wrote:
I have a subject line which I want to remove part of it when replying to it.
I do want to keep all the Re: Fwd: etc. The part that I want to remove is
always the same.
Could some one help me and give me an explanation at the same time so
On Wed 25-Jun-03 10:02am -0400, David Elliott wrote:
a subject from
Re: Fw: [OK] This is not working
to
Re: Fw: This is not working
Hmm. This isn't what you asked for. You asked to change it to:
Re: Re: Fw: This is not working
--
Best regards,
Bill
On Sat 21-Jun-03 7:32am -0400, Robert D. wrote:
Recently, Marck D Pearlstone squawked:
~COMMENT=
notice that I HAD to add some such delimiter as the tilde in front of
COMMENT (in wq) --- otherwise there was no quoted text whatsoever.
What? If you used the wrap2 QT from Marck's message,
On Sat 21-Jun-03 3:57pm -0400, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
On Saturday, June 21, 2003 at 15:34 GMT -0400, resistance was high,
but Bill Mccarthy [BM] made current:
BM Looking at the regex in wrap2, it could behave differently if the
BM 'initials' in front of '' were longer than 5 characters
On Sat 21-Jun-03 1:16am -0400, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
I don't know if that's much clearer.
Perhaps not. I thought it made your solution crisper but we all look
at these things differently.
Don't forget, not everyone knows how to read a regexp. Trying
to figure out what information is
On Fri 20-Jun-03 7:04pm -0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
%_Paragraph_1=%Subpatt(1)%-
%_Blank_Space=%Subpatt(3)%-
%_Remainder_Of_Text=%Subpatt(7)%-
%-
%WRAPPED(%_Paragraph_1)
%_Wrap_Text(%_Remainder_of_Text)%-
%-
%QINCLUDE(wrap2)'%-
Those 9 lines, could be replaced by these 4:
Hello TB Tech List,
In both tbudl and tbtech, Anirban Das [EMAIL PROTECTED]
presented a problem report. Unfortunately, his code in both cases
contain syntax errors, the use of the AB is unnecessary is illustrate
the point, his use of multiple conditions obscures the problem and his
use of group
On Thu 19-Jun-03 8:47am -0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
,--/ a \--
| %AttachFile=_c:\a.txt_
`-8-
%If:2=2:%QINCLUDE=_a_:2 2%-
It works.
Hmm, it didn't work here. I even copied and pasted your '%if' as my
only line in the template. The new mail came up empty with no
On Mon 16-Jun-03 4:58am -0400, Dimka wrote:
Hey there, Bill McCarthy!
i receive messages that are poorly broken
up into paragraphs [...]
B That's impossible to do reliably without artificial intelligence.
B If you think I'm wrong, try writing a rule in plain English
B that's detailed
On Thu 5-Jun-03 4:59am-0400, Damien Marichal wrote:
I apologize for the first mail, just an error from my part.
Some email manager like Outlook put an space between Re and :. The
Bat! didn't count it like a reply.
For example, the subject line is like this:
Re : RE : Re: Re : RE: Hello
Hello TB Tech List,
The filter found in The Bat! Library does not function as
advertised. The problem is in the export template. The following
macro was tested with all 21 possible locations of multi-line
In-Reply-To and References lines (since I don't know the official
rules as to where these
Thanks, Carsten, for looking this over. I appreciate your efforts.
On Tue 3-Jun-03 6:21pm-0400, Carsten Thönges wrote:
There are three equal parts (1, 2, 3) that match an IRT or Refereces
header. Each followed by an (.*?) (X). You first check for the
existance of both headers, then for only
On Mon 2-Jun-03 9:08pm-0400, Carsten Thönges wrote:
* Bill McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is it your version:
((.*\n)In-Reply-To:.*?\nReferences:.*?\n(?:\s.*?\n)*)|((.*\n
On Sun 1-Jun-03 5:11am-0400, Carsten Thönges wrote:
* Bill McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The key is knowing what macro represents the clip board. I couldn't
find it.
%CLIPBOARD
Thanks for responding. That was sure simple. But now that I have you
on the line g ...
Although I'm
On Sat 31-May-03 6:59pm-0400, Carsten Thönges wrote:
* Bill McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu 29-May-03 12:13pm-0400, Gwyn Evans wrote:
If there is a References: line, remove only it. Any In-Reply-To: line
stays put as do any references that had followed the References: line.
So
On Thu 29-May-03 12:13pm-0400, Gwyn Evans wrote:
Has anyone used the Add_Reference from the above
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/Library.html#rethread+messages
as whenever I try, the reference doesn't get added to the edited
message.
snip
Is there anyone who's be able to comment on
On Tue 27-May-03 7:16am-0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@27-May-2003, 02:05 -0400 (07:05 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This is clearly not in agreement with the original mail. A
better approach is to prepend a '' to any text line starting
with From , From , From
On Tue 27-May-03 9:11pm-0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@27-May-2003, 20:46 -0400 (01:46 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
BM I did not suggest it was TB in the mail to which you were responding.
Not there, but I was responding to this...
... THAT ISN'T WHAT I
On Tue 27-May-03 10:49pm-0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@28-May-2003, 03:44 Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP Indeed. I'll try one, since I use my own servers and no relay:
From me.
QED - the list servers do it.
I'm glad that's cleared up.
BTW - you'll notice
24 matches
Mail list logo
