Hello Peter,
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:45:20 +0200 GMT (24/05/02, 20:45 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
PP> More correct is: it's a not folder based view-filter, once applied valid
PP> for all folders you're about to browse to, until you release the filter
PP> (e.g. with +<+>)
Or with the ke
Hello Keith,
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:06:23 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:06 +0700 GMT),
Keith Rodrigues wrote:
KR> 2) Use a free email service that allows you to send from their
KR> smtp server, with authentication. I use myrealbox
KR> (www.myrealbox.com) for this. Set up an account with them, then
KR>
Hello Reza,
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:29:46 -0400 GMT (25/05/02, 02:29 +0700 GMT),
Reza Habib wrote:
RH> Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the
RH> host directly, bypassing the isp. That would be a really cool feature
RH> for TB to adopt.
You need to stay connected u
Saturday, May 25, 2002, 5:11:53 AM, you wrote:
RD> I am in the process of migrating my workstation from Win98SE running
RD> TB v1.60h (at least I think it's h) over to WinXP. Now should I save
RD> the Ritlabs registry key and just copy the total program directory
RD> over? Install it new and
Friday, 5/24/02, 8:59 PM
Hi Pete,
On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 19:25:09 [GMT -0600] (which was 6:25 PM where I live)
you wrote about: 'Link catching, was Re: Cookies wanted!'
P> I am not sure I understand what you mean by 'which viewer'. You do know I
P> was talking about a link in the email body,
Hi Ricardo,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 00:59:20 -0300, you wrote:
> El sábado 25 de mayo de 2002, 0.53, Jonathan Angliss decía:
> JA> If you have them set to simultaneously connect to the same account,
> JA> chances are, one account is getting an "account locked" message, but not
> JA> passing it back
El sábado 25 de mayo de 2002, 0.53, Jonathan Angliss decía:
JA> If you have them set to simultaneously connect to the same account, chances are,
JA> one account is getting an "account locked" message, but not passing it back to
JA> the error view.
they are not. One connects to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ricardo,
On Sat, 25 May 2002 00:44:33 -0300, you wrote:
> *25/5/2002, 00.35.27: FETCH - receiving mail messages
> !25/5/2002, 00.35.28: FETCH - Server reports error. The response is:
>
> It seems to fail when attempting to connect simultaneously to the same
> server, although I don't know if
a few days ago I created a second account at softhome.net to handle
all the mailing lists traffic, and added it to TB. I have both (and
another one at other domain) configured to check automatically when
connection to Internet, but of the 2 softhome accounts, one always
fails to connect, with the
Hello All,
I am in the process of migrating my workstation from Win98SE running
TB v1.60h (at least I think it's h) over to WinXP. Now should I save
the Ritlabs registry key and just copy the total program directory
over? Install it new and restore my files from backup?
Any known pitfalls
Hi there, Graeme,
Thursday, May 23, 2002, 7:16:02 AM, you wrote:
GJH> Julius,
>> Still don't get any prompts on the toolbar buttons. Been trying to fix with
>> ver 160c, 160k, and now with 160m. No luck. Button darkens, but no prompt
>> and I have to guess at what pictogram in button means... u
Replying to your message of Friday, May 24, 2002, 6:01:55 PM:
PW> Nope! Doesn't work here either using fixed width viewer. Which viewer
PW> are you using?
Paul,
I am not sure I understand what you mean by 'which viewer'. You do know I
was talking about a link in the email body, not SmartBat.
Bats-
Any experience using The Bat! as a service under Windows NT / 2k
server?
I've currently got it configured as a System Task set to launch on
restart, but that has the following problems:
1. it's running behind the scenes. If I double-click on the desktop
icon, of course nothing happens bec
Hello...
I was reluctant to even post this, but after a few days now, and
reading others posts, I believe there is something, but I am not
really sure what, so it's kind of a waste to post but, oh well!
Friday, May 24, 2002, 5:01:29 PM, you wrote:
>> I can confirm "issues" with 1.60m and XP.
>>
Hi RapidFX,
On Fri, 24 May 2002 16:47:08 -0800, you wrote:
> Hello...
> I can confirm "issues" with 1.60m and XP.
> flaky is about the correct description also :)
> Seems leaving Bat! open for lengths of time over 1-2 hours
> or so, creates a bit of havoc with my system.
> "flaky" being applicati
Hello...
I can confirm "issues" with 1.60m and XP.
flaky is about the correct description also :)
Seems leaving Bat! open for lengths of time over 1-2 hours
or so, creates a bit of havoc with my system.
"flaky" being applications freezing or otherwise becoming unstable.
This does not seem to happe
Friday, 5/24/02, 4:59 PM
Hi Pete,
On Thu, 23 May 2002, at 11:24:33 [GMT -0600] (which was 10:24 AM where I live)
you wrote about: 'Link catching, was Re: Cookies wanted!'
P> When I put my mouse in a link it then turns into a blue arrow. I then
P> double click and it opens the browser and goes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Conroy [DC] wrote:
...
ACM>> What OS are you running?
DC> Win2K
I've had GDI problems in Win2k and the application would crash, not
Win2k. I don't have any solutions except trying to run the system with
nothing else running except the bare mini
Hi Allie,
Saturday, May 25, 2002, 12:32:09 AM, you wrote:
ACM> What OS are you running?
Win2K
With best wishes,
Dave
--
David Conroy MSW
Consultant, Trainer & Management Coach
International Coach Federation, ID 1006660
Voluntary sector support: http://www.coaching-lab.com
Coaching via e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Conroy [DC] wrote:
...
DC> A little unstable, tends to freeze up more than I remember the
DC> previous version doing so.
Version 6.02 is actually quite solid on my system here. I'm impressed
with it so far.
ACM>> As to your other problem, I rea
Hi Allie,
Friday, May 24, 2002, 6:18:12 PM, you wrote:
ACM> Flaky is a vague word. What do you mean by it?
A little unstable, tends to freeze up more than I remember the
previous version doing so.
ACM> As to your other problem, I really don't have a clue. It would be nice
ACM> to be able to re
This is a re-send.
I had a bunch of msgs disappear from a common folder w/o
an expiration date but with compression.
Are they retrievable? If so, how? Any thoughts how they
'disappeared.?
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V1.60c/W2K_SP2
ICQ 41116329
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Allie C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RD> How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes
> RD> via the smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'?
> Your best bet would be to use your own SMTP server. There was one
> mentioned in a threa
Friday, May 24, 2002, 10:51:17 AM, tracer scribbled:
>> Crossposting is out of the question. I will not have my email address
>> posted on USENET ever again.
t> The last isnt a problem as long as it is a throw away email address...
That's real convenient when you have certificates and PGP keys
Saturday, 25 May 2002
Hi Chris,
On Sat, 25 May 2002, at 09:48:25 [GMT +1200] (which was 9:48 a.m. here
in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote:
CH> There is a quicker way and that is to left click on the account
Sorry everyone I should have said RIGHT click!
--
Regards,
Chris
Smile and Be Happy!
Saturday, 25 May 2002
Hi Chris,
On Sat, 25 May 2002, at 09:48:25 [GMT +1200] (which was 9:48 a.m. here
in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote:
CH> Saturday, 25 May 2002
CH> Hi Dwight,
CH> On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 11:33:42 [GMT -0500] (which was 4:33 a.m. here
CH> in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote:
DAC>>
Saturday, 25 May 2002
Hi Dwight,
On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 11:33:42 [GMT -0500] (which was 4:33 a.m. here
in Eastbourne, N.Z.) you wrote:
DAC> or drag the message to the outbox of the account to
DAC> which you are connected.
There is a quicker way and that is to left click on the account
liste
Hello Ray Dawson,
Friday, May 24, 2002, 10:55:29 AM, in a galaxy far, far away,
Ray wrote:
RD> How on earth do other users manage with SMTP posting and
RD> multiple accounts? Surely relying on third-party applications
RD> to send mail is not normal? I can be connected to any one of
RD> four ISPs
KE> It's a pity that TB doesn't do this. One of the few good things
KE> with Becky! was that it had an option that said something like
KE> "send all outboxes mail through this account" or something to that
Foxmail has a built in smtp server so it will relay your mail to the
host directly, bypass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MW> If not, and if at least one of your ISP accounts *will* allow you to
MW> access their SMTP server while you're logged on to someplace else, set
MW> that server as your SMTP account. Then do as above and place a
MW> checkmark in the Perform SMTP A
Hello Miguel
Thank you for your email dated Friday, May 24, 2002, 5:58:45 PM, in which you wrote:
MAU> Light gray. ;-)
Light grey looks much better. ;-)
--
Regards
William
Flying with The Bat! 1.60m
Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service Pack 2
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Krister Ekstrom [KE] wrote:
...
KE>
KE> It's a pity that TB doesn't do this. One of the few good things with
KE> Becky! was that it had an option that said something like "send all
KE> outboxes mail through this account" or something to that effect.
Ray-
You may have some more options here. I've set this up for a client in
the following manner:
Go to Account | Properties | Transport | Send Mail and click the
Authentication button. It's possible that "Use POP before SMTP
authentication" is all you need. This works for most of my situations.
Hello Krister,
> This meant that you could send all outgoing mail regardless of isp,
> (or so i understand it) and it went out through the smtp server of
> the account with which i currently worked.
If I understand correctly what you mean, that would not solve the
problem completely. Aside of th
Hi Dwight,
It so happened that On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 11:33:42 [GMT -0500] (which was 18:33 in my
corner of the world) ,you typed:
>> Why does TB insist on only sending mail through the smtp of the
>> account it was written from rather than the account it's connected
>> to?
DAC> It doesn't. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave Conroy [DC] wrote:
...
DC> Also, Opera seems more flaky that usual, but also able to access
DC> sites that I used to have problems with. Anyone have similar
DC> flakiness issue with Opera since 6.02?
Flaky is a vague word. What do you mean by it
I have updated a few things recently, including TB! to 1.60m, Netscape
to 7 and Opera to 6.02. I have now taken Netscape off incase it was
cause of problem below.
My hitherto very reliable machine is suddenly without warning totally
shutting down and rebooting ... no error message, just switch of
Hi RapidFX,
It so happened that On Fri, 24 May 2002, at 07:29:17 [GMT -0800] (which was 17:29 in my
corner of the world) ,you typed:
R> Why would you want a mailto: link to launch your browser?
Oooops! typo there... a mailto: link should of course start a new msg
and an http:// url should start
Hello Peter,
> @Miguel: You're right: it should stay white ... Well ... light-gray, as
> this is my default background color in window elements :-)
OK, that's a deal. Light gray. ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.60c
___
Hello Allie,
> Freeware that immediately comes to mind is Mercury/32. It will solve
> your SMTP headache and make interesting possibilities for you in terms
> of it's POP server support.
Mercury/32 is a great mail server, well supported and totally FREE. I
have used it for about one year now.
M
Hello David,
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 6:24:53 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
>> SGVsbG8gSmVybmVqLA0KDQpPbiBGcmlkYXksIE1heSAyNCwgMjAwMiBhdCA1OjEzOjM3IFBNIHlv
DE> < ... >
DE> I bet you have done the same as me. Check account | Properties | Mail
DE>
Hey Allie,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60m)
to write the following on Friday, May 24, 2002 at 11:21:00 AM.
RD>> How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes
RD>> via the smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'?
ACM> Your best bet would be to use your own SMTP
Hello tracer!
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 5:51:17 PM you wrote:
> The last isnt a problem as long as it is a throw away email address...
I am now on the list for slightly more than 2 years. With a throw away
address (I do use such sometimes) I'd have to re-subscribe very often
...
--
Dierk Ha
On Friday, May 24, 2002, 10:55:29 AM, Ray Dawson wrote:
> Why does TB insist on only sending mail through the smtp of the
> account it was written from rather than the account it's connected
> to?
It doesn't. It sends it through the account where the message is in
the outbox. If you want to send
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter
On 24 May 2002 at 17:57:39 +0200 (which was 16:57 where I live) Peter
Palmreuther wrote and made these points
> SGVsbG8gSmVybmVqLA0KDQpPbiBGcmlkYXksIE1heSAyNCwgMjAwMiBhdCA1OjEzOjM3IFBNIHlv
< ... >
I bet you have done the same as me. Check
Hello Peter,
> SGVsbG8gSmVybmVqLA0KDQpPbiBGcmlkYXksIE1heSAyNCwgMjAwMiBhdCA1OjEzOjM3IFBNIHlv
> dSB3cm90ZSBpbg0KbWlkOjEzNTYyMDQ0ODI1LjIwMDIwNTI0MTcxMzM3QGd1ZXN0LmFybmVzLnNp
> IChhdCBsZWFzdCBpbiBwYXJ0KToNCg0KUFA+PiBUaGlzIHdvdWxkIG9wZW4gdXAgYSB2aXJ0dWFs
No, disagree. I think it should stay white. ;-
On Friday, May 24, 2002, Ray Dawson wrote...
> This may be the one single thing that stops me using TB - which is a
> pity as I was really getting it working.
> How on earth do other users manage with SMTP posting and multiple
> accounts?
I run several mail servers, so I don't even use my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@24 May 2002, 17:57:39 +0200 (16:57 UK time) Peter Palmreuther wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PP>>> This would open up a virtual folder here, containing round about 17000
PP>>> messages, without any folder index so The B
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Pete,
@24 May 2002, 09:44:07 -0600 (16:44 UK time) Pete Milne wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is there a way to not have all the messages I have sent go to the
> sent folder?
Well, yes... by using Outgoing message filters
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marek
Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 May 2002, Ray Dawson wrote:
> > How can I configure TB to 'Send all queued email in all Outboxes via
> > the smtp of the ISP which we are connected to'?
> it is not possible with TB, but You can try freeware util
On Friday, May 24, 2002, tracer wrote...
> Michael Disabato wrote:
>> Crossposting is out of the question. I will not have my email address
>> posted on USENET ever again.
> The last isnt a problem as long as it is a throw away email address...
Or the server is a private server, and users requ
Hi Pete,
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 09:44:07 [GMT -0600], you wrote:
PM> Is there a way to not have all the messages I have sent go to the
PM> sent folder?
"Sorting Office -> Outgoing mail" is what you are looking for.
--
Regards,
Lars
The Bat! 1.60m on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
___
SGVsbG8gSmVybmVqLA0KDQpPbiBGcmlkYXksIE1heSAyNCwgMjAwMiBhdCA1OjEzOjM3IFBNIHlv
dSB3cm90ZSBpbg0KbWlkOjEzNTYyMDQ0ODI1LjIwMDIwNTI0MTcxMzM3QGd1ZXN0LmFybmVzLnNp
IChhdCBsZWFzdCBpbiBwYXJ0KToNCg0KUFA+PiBUaGlzIHdvdWxkIG9wZW4gdXAgYSB2aXJ0dWFs
IGZvbGRlciBoZXJlLCBjb250YWluaW5nIHJvdW5kIGFib3V0IDE3MDAwDQpQUD4+IG1
Hello Michael Disabato,
On Thu, 23 May 2002 16:26:01 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, May 24, 2002, 4:26:01 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Michael Disabato wrote:
> Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 1:11:05 AM, Thomas scribbled:
TF>> Newsgroups and Mailing Lists have different climates. I
Hello Pete,
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 5:44:07 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
PM> Is there a way to not have all the messages I have sent go to the sent
PM> folder?
Yes. Setting up an 'Outgoing mail' filter, that moves or deletes the
messages th
Is there a way to not have all the messages I have sent go to the sent
folder?
-
Pete
9:35:56 AM
-
Ask about eScan Content-Security and Anti-Virus Software.
"We will meet all of your Anti-Virus needs."
www.milneweb.com
__
Hello...
Why would you want a mailto: link to launch your browser?
Friday, May 24, 2002, 3:11:02 AM, you wrote:
RO>> But does it start a browser when double click it?
KE> FYI, it doesn't do it here. Imho, this should be configurable so that
KE> mailto or other links should start the browser.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ray Dawson [RD] wrote:
...
RD> The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to
RD> send all email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of
RD> the ISP I'm logged on to. If I click on 'Send All' TB tries to
RD> connect to the
Hello Peter!
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 4:57:05 PM you wrote:
> This would open up a virtual folder here, containing round about 17000
> messages, without any folder index so The Bat! would have to crawl through
> all folders manually and building the index for 17000 mails 'on the fly'
> ... No
Hello Peter,
24. maj 2002, 16:57:05, you wrote:
PP> This would open up a virtual folder here, containing round about 17000
PP> messages, without any folder index so The Bat! would have to crawl through
PP> all folders manually and building the index for 17000 mails 'on the fly'
PP> ... No sire,
Hello Dierk,
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 4:19:13 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
DH> OTOH, it would be a nice idea to have a kind of new folder view
DH> opening with all selected messages ...
And a resource killer too :-) Imagine this virtual folder o
ON Friday, May 24, 2002, 4:19:13 PM, you wrote:
DH> Yeah, give me a few minutes of sun and I'll screw up big. After yours
DH> and Peter's explanation it became obviously clear where I went astray.
DH> OTOH, it would be a nice idea to have a kind of new folder view
DH> opening with all selected
Hello Pete!
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 4:05:31 PM you wrote:
> Are you talking about using a link in SmartBat or in the email body. I was
> under the assumption we were talking about the email body. If
> notwow, have I got egg on my face!
Yes. I think nobody has a problem with links in e-
Hello Gerard!
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 3:50:01 PM you wrote:
> All folders are now sorted in this way, at least for the options I tried
> it worked, but you will have to click on the folder.
> If you were expecting one view with all msg's form all folders, that
> not what it does.
Yeah, g
Hello MikeM,
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 3:56:38 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
M> Ouch. Since NT4, the GDI functionality of Windows NT has been running
M> at ring 0. Not the best of places to have a memory leak.
You bet :-)
But thank god it's not
Replying to your message of Friday, May 24, 2002, 12:40:11 AM:
DH> Just tested it, the "hyperlink" is just not selectable as an entity.
DH> SmartBat sees it only as formatted text.
Are you talking about using a link in SmartBat or in the email body. I was
under the assumption we were talking
On Fri, 24 May 2002 20:22:39 +0700 Syafril Hermansyah
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send
> > > all email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the
> > > ISP > I'm logged on to. If I click on 'Send All' TB tries t
ON Friday, May 24, 2002, 3:02:24 PM, you wrote:
DH> Ok, that worked, but not as expected. Someone wrote that this way all
DH> messages with the chosen criterion - regardless of the folder they are
DH> in - would be shown. No, I only get those in the folder I am in ...
Hi Dierk,
All folders are
On 5/24/2002 at 3:37 AM Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
>Hi Wayne,
>
>@24 May 2002, 19:15:45 -0700 (03:15 UK time) Wayne Black wrote in
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> What is a GDI leak
>
>Graphic Device Interface resources are things like window handles,
>brushes, fonts and pens. Progra
Hi, Dierk.
On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:02:24 +0200 GMT your local time, which was
Friday, May 24, 2002, 7:02 AM -0700 GMT here,
you wrote:
> Ok, that worked, but not as expected. Someone wrote that this way all
> messages with the chosen criterion - regardless of the folder they are
> in - would be
Hello Dierk,
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 3:02:24 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
>> Don't click on the colum header but on a msg.
>> If you click on the litlle yellow envelope in a msg you get all the
>> unread msg's.
>> Click on the name of the author
Hello Gerard!
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 10:55:43 AM you wrote:
> Don't click on the colum header but on a msg.
> If you click on the litlle yellow envelope in a msg you get all the
> unread msg's.
> Click on the name of the author and you get, well you get the
> picture ;-)
Ok, that worked
On Fri, 24 May 2002 13:21:58 +0100 Ray Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send > all email in
>the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the ISP > I'm logged on to. If I
>click on 'Send All' TB tries to connect to the > s
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the help!
Best regards,
Joe O mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, May 24, 2002, 2:34:02 AM, you wrote:
> Hello joeo,
> On Thu, 23 May 2002 19:28:16 -0400 GMT (24/05/02, 06:28 +0700 GMT),
> joeo wrote:
j>> Is it possible to sort on multiple ke
Hello Marck!
On Friday, May 24, 2002 at 12:06:51 PM you wrote:
> And Win2k users using the RTV.
Funny, considering that the first time we had a resource/memory
handling problem around it was only us poor 9x users ...
For now - using RTV since the leak was filled - I can't find any
problems con
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Ray Dawson wrote:
> I've got accounts with four different ISPs and send email with all four
> for different purposes.
>
> The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send all
> email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the ISP I'm
> logged o
I've got accounts with four different ISPs and send email with all four
for different purposes.
The problem is that when I connect to one ISP I can't get TB to send all
email in the various Outboxes through the smtp server of the ISP I'm
logged on to. If I click on 'Send All' TB tries to connec
Hey Allie,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60m)
to write the following on Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 2:38:59 PM.
TM>> How do you switch the text selection modes?
ACM> Three ways:
Thanks!
TM>> Also, how do you "ndent whole text blocks and paste text indented"?
ACM> To indent text block
Hi Miguel,
It so happened that On Thu, 23 May 2002, at 19:47:12 [GMT +0200] (which was 19:47 in my
corner of the world) ,you typed:
>> It doesn't appear to be working on mine either, I'm running 1.60c I
>> think... might have been 'fixed' in a later version.
MAU> Nope. It's working here with 1.
Hi Roelof,
It so happened that On Thu, 23 May 2002, at 18:13:43 [GMT +0200] (which was 18:13 in my
corner of the world) ,you typed:
DAC>> it supports it here. I just typed www.xxx.yyy in smart bat and it
DAC>> turned into a hyperlink
RO> But does it start a browser when double click it?
FYI, i
Hello Julian,
On Fri, 24 May 2002 08:59:42 +0100 GMT (24/05/02, 14:59 +0700 GMT),
Julian Beach (Lists) wrote:
JBL> Does anyone know how to get rid of this BlackIce message
JBL> permanently
In Win98: My Computer / Software / choose BlackIce / Add/Remove
I don't know how to do it in XP.
--
Ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 24, 2002, 6:42 AM, you wrote:
MDP>>> Specifically, the Rich Text View (RTV) in 1.60m suffers from a
MDP>>> resource leak. The version is perfectly stable when using the
MDP>>> PTV or when using the RTV for short periods (and exiting T
I have updated a few things recently, including TB! 1.60m, Netscape 7
and Opera 6.02. I have now taken Netscape off. My hitherto very
reliable machine is suddenly without warning totally shutting down and
rebooting ... no error message, just switch off, black screen,
reboot!! Very strange. Would T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@24 May 2002, 06:20:19 -0400 (11:20 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP>> Specifically, the Rich Text View (RTV) in 1.60m suffers from a
MDP>> resource leak. The version is perfectly stable when us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, May 23, 2002, 10:37 PM, you wrote:
>> and does 1.60m have this?
MDP> Specifically, the Rich Text View (RTV) in 1.60m suffers from a
MDP> resource leak. The version is perfectly stable when using the PTV or
MDP> when using the RTV for s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, May 24, 2002, 2:30 AM, you wrote:
DH> There seem to have been a few problems with certain set ups on certain
DH> systems, mostly S/MIME related, that have been addressed by quick
DH> hot-fixes - the alphabetised 1.60 versions.
DH> While
-Original Message-
From: Marck D Pearlstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Richard Evans on TBUDL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 00:03:18 +0100
Subject: Re: Editor issue
Enter a line of headings, spaced like you want them.
*Now* use tabs on the *next* (and subsequent) lines.
Y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
@24 May 2002, 08:30:09 +0200 (07:30 UK time) Dierk Haasis wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ... And all reports that I have seen seem to be from XP users.
And Win2k users using the RTV.
- --
Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlst
On Friday, May 24, 2002, 10:20:40 AM, Marcus Ohlström wrote:
> Why not give yourself admin rights temporarily, fix the problem and
> then revert back to the permission level you want?
The message pops up every time that BlackIce starts as a warning,
rather than a response to particular changes.
On Friday, May 24, 2002, 09:59, Julian Beach (Lists) wrote:
> The other possibility is a fight for focus between TB and a BlackIce
> dialogue telling me that I cannot change settings because I don't have
> admin rights. If I cancel this dialogue as soon as it appears, TB
> seems OK, but if I mi
On Friday, May 24, 2002, 7:37:04 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
> With more than one account being checked at start-up, if you the
> prompt to enter your connection password for the first account, you
> won't see the second (or third) password prompt (for the other
> accounts. It then seems like TB! is
Hello Chris!
On Thursday, May 23, 2002 at 10:42:18 PM you wrote:
> This has happened three times today. The first time I had about 245
> messages to download. The next time I had about 280, then the next
> time just over 300. The latest batch was 378 to download. Lots of
> dupes to delet
Hello Kai!
On Thursday, May 23, 2002 at 9:59:07 PM you wrote:
> I am somewhat confused with regard to Ritlabs' current TB release
> policy. Right now, there are so many updates/bugfixes for 1.60 that I
> have no clue which version to use.
And once again:
There seem to have been a few problems
93 matches
Mail list logo
