Hello Karin Spaink,
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000 02:57:53 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, October 04, 2000, 7:57:53 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Karin Spaink wrote:
> On 04-10-2000 at 01:14, tracer kindly wrote:
>> John Sullivan wrote:
>>> Something I've noticed a
ppey to have moved to 2000, It does allow shutdowns
much easier and crashes much less.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.47 Beta/5 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
to dump Dos and get people moved to NT
One big incompatible jump doesnt work so they try it in many small
ones.
Many older hardware addons donot work, no drivers.
> Using THE Bat! 1.46d
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.47 Beta/5 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 11:06:08 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, October 03, 2000, 10:06:08 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Hi tracer,
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2000 01:23:24 +0700GMT (03/10/2000, 02:23 +0800GMT),
> tracer
sts on intercepting MAPI application calls.
> Any ideas?
remove netscape..
Sorry, while I hate it as a product, I AM using IE and my system
is a lot more stable...
> - K -
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.47 Beta/5 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using
ntially like here, they havent got a clue how to run an isp
service and I donot want MY mail to be sitting anywhere where
essentially ## are controlling what happens to my mail.
An example is a local hotel which almost went out of business as isp
messed up his website AND mail.
> Dougla
oned drive, it can
take very long to defrag but after this 'usage' criteria has been
applied for a while it gets faster and faster.
Personally I have a feeling as long as you DO defrag, most products
likely show very little difference in daily usage..
Best regards,
tracer
--
Usin
r say Eudora is
> halfway decent we may not respect your opinions.
Better, anyone using silly tools like that and sending a virus
ought to be banned...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.47 Beta/5 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am usin
e way output
>>> onto disk works, it makes good sense. ;-)
>> Using NTFS here, but it seems that Microsoft's old claims of it being
>> non-fraggable are untrue :)
> How do you defrag NTFS disks? Do you use DiskKeeper?
perfect disk.
And obviously MS claim is untrue
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000 01:58:02 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, September 24, 2000, 7:58:02 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Hi tracer,
t>>
t>> %Cursor%Quotes="%SetPattRegExp=""(?is)(.*^-BEGIN P
way the group banners...
End of Quote
> Sadly there is no way of altering incoming message text without doing
> a filter which exports the message, calls an external process to
> perform the automatic stripping function and invoke the TB import
> function (the export filter can
someone forks the actual money out
you also send him a 10 day extension to the bat so that at least his
email stays working...
--
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.47 Beta/5
NO MICROSOFT VIRUS INFECTIONS
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using FireTalk: 321338
pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10
ut but he likes websites, I hate them.
Also if you really have to make one bury frontpage. Its a MS dinasaur
like outlook. Grab Dreamweaver if you want tplay with a webpage and
read the docs.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.47 Beta/5 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMA
at had passed through my inbox.
I never have more then one number behind the inbox and for sure I
filter
> - K -
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.47 Beta/1 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www
not see it but then maybe it gets chopped by that pgp banner
removing expression I use. Sorry, not seeing it means I havent got a
clue what it would like like..
> - K -
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.47 Beta/1 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321
me collected messages. Will this matter?
> Nope, just the message ID.
>> I did look in the help file for all this but I'm not seeing anything
>> returned for "Dupes", duplicates or similar...
> It is a fairly recent addition, and the Help files have not been kept
.
I have been to busy to check if he already finsihed it but his
departure wasnt Steve as only reason, he was just plain busy with
work...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phu
think he has been too long in support work, one needs an
elephantskin to survive it... AND one has to be able to see the funny
side of the silly things one sees...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on
ft the building:
S>> Something we should all strive to remember... There are NO dumb
S>> questions, or dumb opinions. (Just mis-informed.)
> Probably so ... but let's not test that theory to any great extent.
> :-)
Consider applying it to politics...
> Chuck
Best regards,
for the few months he had on the net
without any major problems. Nothing sophisticated but I had expected a
total mess... All it needed was a bit of handholding to get him
going and I am sure that with Outlook or so it would have been much
worse .
Best regards,
tracer
--
Usi
rning point for the list. A thousand years of peace. :-)".
MDP>> We shall see.
> This is indeed a pity, despite his abrasive style SL definitely made
> some valuable contributions to the list, I for one am sorry to see him
> go.
Is this a ban on sending and receiving or a post b
ayed more or less out of editor fights as I find
my usage in emails is fairly basic and while the bat isnt my
favorite neither would others which have been proposed.
If v2 ever comes out I likely will use whatever external editor I like
best and which works smoothest
Best regards,
tracer
--
ore secure that the microsoft programs. Added its extreemly
likely to lose address book and mail if you get a windows crash or at
least cost you much more for a computer shop to recover old mail etc.
> Susanne
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 02:35:31 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, September 18, 2000, 1:35:31 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Hallo tracer,
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 01:19:03 +0700 GMT (18/09/2000, 02:19 +0800 GMT),
> tracer wrote:
get nowhere...
Thats nothing, In Holand they have a town where years ago they had
like 50 churches and more different variations of religions (they
shared some buildings).
Ok, they didnt get anywhere over the ages but they are still
there(g)
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 23:53:36 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, September 17, 2000, 10:53:36 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Hallo tracer and Richard Head,
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 15:41:23 +0100 GMT (17/09/2000, 22:41 +0800 GMT),
n:
> 17 September 2000 at 01:09:59 GMT -0700
JA>> Why do you need to sleep?
I donot have to, it just happens sometimes. ALSO to some customers
amusement when installing a windows...
> I have a week old baby keeps asking me the same question :-)
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using th
in the Netherlands.
So what?
This an international mailing list. Nothing to do with whats she
writes or not in some Dutch rag. Most had an extreemly limited choice
of words from what I remember...
On the other hand it seems to me we are well headed to a farm of dead
horses
Best regards,
gets himself (g).
'if it doesnt have peppers nobody wants to read it' (g)
While I have been years away from the Netherlands I would say chances
we have here a famous writer fighting with the Bat are about the same
as me winning the Thai corrupt lottery..
Best regards,
tracer
PS, My
ed. so I guess I'm lucky this
> time. :-)
due partly to the time difference. They fight when we sleep...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our s
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Sun, 17 Sep 2000 03:10:24 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, September 17, 2000, 9:10:24 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Hi tracer,
> On 16 September 2000 at 00:23:38 GMT +0700 (which was 18:23 where I
> live) tracer
its amazing how
many people speak English and manage to totally confuse each other...
Probably not much better with Moldavia.
Secondly considering that all their docs are way out of date I wouldnt
be surprised if that statement also has survived where it shouldnt...
Best regards,
tracer
--
U
and
> the attachment was visible. It was shown by the name of
> "C:FilesDocsRegInfo1.rtf", though.
> Questions are: Is the format used in that mail even RFC-compliant? Even
> if it's not, do you agree it's still in bug in TB?
> Thanks!
> Olive
e same functionallity as for version
> <=6.X.X - not if NAI will support The Bat! in future versions of PGP.
Do you trust a pgp 7 which hasnt been properly pulled to pieces??
> regards
> marcus
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMA
Not sure how many people on the list had a hand in creating this one,
quite a few if I remember
By the way it also includes the expression to remove the pgp banners added to
some msgs...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000 02:04:42 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Wednesday, September 06, 2000, 8:04:42 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Hi tracer,
> On 05 September 2000 at 22:38:24 GMT +0700 (which was 16:38 where I
> live) tra
Hello Assad Toorab,
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000 10:04:58 +0400 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, September 05, 2000, 1:04:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Assad Toorab wrote:
> Hello tracer,
> On 05 September 2000, you wrote and made these points on the subject
> of "Arabic Chara
le to solve the problem. I simply re-install windows!!!
isnt really solving it as why is it there on reinstall...
Anyway, I will have a look at it after I get some of my customers
happy whom are all coming back from long vacations to partly dead
systems One had salt on his videocard...
Best re
z>> Thanks,
z>> ztrader
> Dupes?
> Doesn't TB! have automatic deduping now?
spam delete filters?
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.
tem do it?
Its part of my windows 2000 after I added arabic in.
> Thanks.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailser
the
address is wrong so they remove you off the list
(Snipped the rest)
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our spe
forgot to install the language part...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational
Hello Assad Toorab,
On Sun, 3 Sep 2000 16:19:40 +0400 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, September 03, 2000, 7:19:40 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Assad Toorab wrote:
> Hello tracer,
> On 03 September 2000, you wrote and made these points on the subject
> of "CJK (again)&q
s heruistic methods
> are bad. Same performace is with McAfee. Again I suggest AVP!
same performance isnt surprising since Mcafee nicked part of the
Symantec code before they bought Dr Solomons and the Av part
wasnt the only sw Symantec found pieces of their code.
Best regards,
tracer
) can mean it will be used
by them and that means the hole gets blocked...
Open servers of any kind shouldnt be broadcast into the open to
mailing lists...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on req
esis, or
> is there another reason this is not working? Is the : a special
> character, perhaps?
When this problem is sorted out, any chance to get something like that
in the docs, Faq or as standard installed...
> Thanks for your help,
> ztradermailto:[EM
stuck together less those unwanted pieces of code CA stuck in.
It just a matter of the right stimulance being needed.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our spec
If I was a truly dedicated spammer,I'd subscribe to lots of lists,
> collect all the replies, and harvest them. Not much one can do about
> that, though :-(((.
> ztrader
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using
.
> ztradermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operat
d of upgrading my advice to my customers has always
been not to use those products...
To say many Trojans go through this hole... most have their own.
www.lavasoft.de
have a look for the free script cleaner as well, more capable I think
then the one on Steves site... and free.
Best regards,
tracer
re the most userfriendly but worst
programs, any holes in them...
I havent seen any warning against others.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows NT
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special
c
try and recreate any missing accounts..
> Assuming that I make sure this isn't the case first, do you
> foresee any other problems?
> Thanks.
--
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using FireTalk: 321338
LOCAL phone: 271194/
Hello Jan-Arild Løkstad,
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 12:24:00 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, August 18, 2000, 5:24:00 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote:
> Hello tracer,
> Thursday, August 17, 2000, 1:55:55 AM, you wrote:
>> seems to me that it does make
MATCH=""%text""%SUBPATT=""3"""
ok (sorry) to demonstrate:
If using above script on your email cursor ended up where I pasted it.
Ie Cursor before Quoted.
> Hi tracer,
>> seems to me that it does make sense. You position the cursor, then
>> b
sor, then below that the quote.
if you put quotes first, it likely will produce the quote and then py
putting the cursor, move everything before the cursor position up,
After all, the cursor tells the system where you want to start
editing.
> Jan-Arild
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theB
> You are dead right. I haven't noticed this before.
seems to be a bug to me...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on reque
ranty I would try to get a
replacement/proper working board.
Under most circumstances this kind of odd behaviour would be a
hardware problem.
> microsoft.public.win98.power_mgmt
> microsoft.public.win98.shell
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows 98
mail
o are left over in the inbox.
I also refiltered my inbox (as it had grown to about 1000 emails which
didnt have a special place ) and the whole lot went happily to my spam
box...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTa
Hello Jamie Dainton,
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:56:27 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, August 15, 2000, 2:56:27 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jamie Dainton wrote:
> Hello tracer,
> Sunday, August 13, 2000, 9:09:04 AM, you wrote:
t>> I have a customer who wants to try
e but its easy to think that if
one is on the receiving end of his mail where he doesnt agree...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.c
past but I
think it was outlook express
> Arjan
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: PGP 6.5i
> iQA/AwUBOZZS12Gb/vSxBc3UEQIQywCgvma6szBLHPdibwSJPFLiBCIpE1UAnjDE
> 8vdCsS+NXvJ15UsXB0/nQEb4
> =t+GQ
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using
...
Considering that converted outlook users are easy to convince to
switch (after they get bitten by a virus) it should be a bit easier
to get their data moved
Anyway, I likely do something wrong, ideas welcome.
--
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3
NO MICROSOFT VIRUS
ng or
> substring match"?
Never seen it work correctly. I suspect its the same programming
problem as with a space in between parts before the @.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/3 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on req
ild A
> on a Pentium III 500 MHz notebook with 128MB.
> Tagline of the day:
> Just remember...if the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.46 Beta/2 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ant, I will take it up with them [Thomas arming up].
Want to bet mine never heard of RFC>?
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 S/MIME with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our sp
Hello Dieter Hummel,
On Fri, 28 Jul 2000 01:36:47 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, July 28, 2000, 6:36:47 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Dieter Hummel wrote:
> Hello Listmembers,
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2000 at 18:59:02 [GMT +0700] tracer wrote:
>> the net. To be honest I h
Just delete the Windows directory. xdelete or xdel is the command.
or delete the system.dat/system.da0, user.dat and user da0 and the
various cabs in the system backup where under 98 the scanreg backups
are kept. make sure the windows setup files are on cd, and start the
setup from DOS!!!
Bes
use at present either Rascal Pro to dial in or I directly dial the
connections and other programs get kicked off manually and are all set
NOT to redial except my Bullet ftp.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 S/MIME with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROT
notebook with 128MB.
> Tagline of the day:
> Just remember...if the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 S/MIME with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
We
ediaPlayer 7 and you will get same thing
S>>> as WinME :)
C>> You're giving them the recipe to the worst windows yet?!!
C>> That's not very nice now is it?
> why it should be nice? ;-) Right after releasing TheBat under Linux I
> will do rm -r /mnt/w
ent seen their list but how many programs were NOT made in the
USa on their list...??
> Tst! :-P
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 S/MIME with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special
menu with list of attachments and
> command Save all.
sounds like a good way
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 S/MIME with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special
orizontal bar never seems to sit in the right place
and on my system about 20% is free on the right hand side, as long as
its mail and not html.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 S/MIME with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ts as
rubbish bin to serious answers on some 2 year old reported problems
(even one was fixed a bit late)
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 S/MIME with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our
> advertising on this TBUDL? Hello Moderatar? Leif? Ya out there?
seems like a screwup,,,
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 S/MIME with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Ou
able plain text file with all the messages you select.
BP>> Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs?
> ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities,
> then yes.
what one really needs for mail is a specific database storage me
shtml>
> Using The Bat! 1.45 Beta/9 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A
> on a Pentium III 500 MHz notebook with 128MB.
> Tagline of the day:
> A bad random number generator: 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 4.33e+67, 1, 1, 1
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45
> the list..
> Here, my reg code is:
> SN: IHADTO-PAYFOR-MYBAT-ANDYOU-SHOULD-TOORIT-DESERVES-RESPECT
> CheckSum: PLEASE.JUSTGO.ANDBUY.THEBAT.YOULL.FEEL.BETTER
> password: Only 40 bucks...right?
25 I thought as celebration for the not yet out v2 (g)
Best regards,
tracer
--
bly
thats why he is asking here...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 Beta/9 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational
--
-
Hello Ming-Li,
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 07:21:49 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, July 17, 2000, 9:21:49 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Ming-Li wrote:
> Hi tracer,
>> No idea if you know but there seems to be a cd from MS which is
>> called proofing tools and it has all s
nt I have had
recently some texts which had been written in explorer (g) and
produced some nice readable text in Thai and Chinese even if I didnt
have a clue what it meant (g)
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.44 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
and in which case how do you make it
usable for writing
> Thank you.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.44 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
x27;s not for everyone and I doubt that it
AM>> will hit any charts of the nature posted by Paula.
AM>> Tracer once made a very prudent point. Two versions of TB!? A
AM>> pro version and a simpler version? ..
> I do not really understand why the complexity of T
usly couldnt find my mailfolders so I uninstalled, reinstalled
and then I had all the mail back... Long live saving data NOT in the
registry, at least I didnt lose my passwords for the logons...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.44 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using
ers...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.44 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcomputers.com
Our special website hosting/mailservers are now operational
--
---
have a kind of minimal system at present.
--
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.45 Beta/5
NO MICROSOFT VIRUS INFECTIONS
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using FireTalk: 321338
pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at
r readers donot agree
> ROTFLMAO
> Nick
>--=N.J. (Nick) Andriash=--
> PGP Key ID: 0x7BA3FDCE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Owner ~ http://www.egroups.com/group/PGP-Basics
> To Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 Beta/5
w I
> send mail to a lot of OE5 users who have never reported this issue.
Mark, how can they if they may never have had the mail you send.
Its one of those things if one expects mail and one finds it in the
wrong place...
Any chance it gets hit by some feature of MS OE to prevent
spam/securi
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000 03:08:04 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, July 04, 2000, 9:08:04 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
> Hi tracer,
> On 04 July 2000 at 07:37:49 GMT +0700 (which was 01:37 where I
> live) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, I see all the addresses in the addressbook
folder on the right hand side when going to the copy bar to open the book.
I press arrow keys to the left to stick that lot or one by one in my nice empty address
book, and they donot want to go there
--
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.45
While I have no intentions to use a proportional font , instead of
telling which looks horrible, what about telling us what looks 'not
bad'!!
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 Beta/5 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
Hello Ming-Li,
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000 17:14:05 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, July 02, 2000, 7:14:05 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Ming-Li wrote:
> Hi tracer,
>> Any idea what a message means on send/receive
>> FETCH - cancel requested by operator
>> is t
Hello Steve Lamb,
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 18:02:07 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Saturday, July 01, 2000, 8:02:07 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Steve Lamb wrote:
> Friday, June 30, 2000, 5:57:01 PM, tracer wrote:
>> I asked the isp and they came back with telling it was sec
Hello Jamie Dainton,
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 11:25:45 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, June 30, 2000, 5:25:45 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jamie Dainton wrote:
> Hello tracer,
>>> Hello TBUDL,
>>> Ever since I upgraded to Windows Me Internet Explorer 5
Advice welcome
--
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.45 Beta/1
NO MICROSOFT VIRUS INFECTIONS
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using FireTalk: 321338
pgp 6.5.3 : 0x909D9B10
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutain
Saturday, July 01, 2000
Hello Bat-users,
Any idea what a message means on send/receive
FETCH - cancel requested by operator
Sane server I have been using for ages and anyway, is the
operator ME or the server
--
Best regards,
tracer
Using theBAT 1.45 Beta/1
we converted our own mini PC reader / viewer / directory
browser to PC so when we had the first PC's never a need to use
Edlin...
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 Beta/1 with Windows 98
mail to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using FireTalk: 321338
ICQ: on request
Website: www.phuketcompu
Hello Jamie Dainton,
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:50:01 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, June 30, 2000, 12:50:01 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Jamie Dainton wrote:
> Hello TBUDL,
> Ever since I upgraded to Windows Me Internet Explorer 5 and The
> Bat! are very slow to launch. Any
for the smtp if wanted as I
have smtp problems when logged on via one ISP...
> If there's a freeware utility I can get to (or Win2k itself can)
> provide such detailed log, I'll be happy to test my own system
> for your reference.
Best regards,
tracer
--
Using theBAT 1.45 Beta
Hello Ming-Li,
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 05:04:58 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, June 29, 2000, 7:04:58 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Ming-Li wrote:
> Hi tracer,
Ok, thanks for the explanationand sorry for chopping your long
post above out. One question really so why do I see
201 - 300 of 1071 matches
Mail list logo