Re: OTF encryption

n. JSL>>>>>>> So I wondered, is it possible to send an encrypted email to someone who has no JSL>>>>>>> encryption in use on his email client? If so, how? PB>>>>>> I use 7-zip to create a self-extracting zip file wilth password and PB>>>

Re: OTF encryption

SL>>>>>> I recently had to supply my accountant with my banking information via email. JSL>>>>>> Fortunately the account in question rarely has more that $2000 in it so even if JSL>>>>>> the message were intercepted, I wouldn't lose very

Re: OTF encryption

Hello Paul, On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 17:33:03 +1000 GMT (10-Sep-17, 14:33 +0700 GMT), Paul Berger wrote: TF>> Just my two cents. > Thanks, Jack. It is all very helpful. My name is Thomas, but that's OK. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Message reply created with The Bat! 7.4.16.33 (ALPHA) under Windows 10

Re: OTF encryption

n. JSL>>>>>>> So I wondered, is it possible to send an encrypted email to someone who has no JSL>>>>>>> encryption in use on his email client? If so, how? PB>>>>>> I use 7-zip to create a self-extracting zip file wilth password and PB>>>

Re: OTF encryption

2000 in it so even if JSL>>>>>> the message were intercepted, I wouldn't lose very much. The account has no JSL>>>>>> overdraft protection. JSL>>>>>> So I wondered, is it possible to send an encrypted email to someone who has no JSL

Re: OTF encryption

. JSL>>>>> Fortunately the account in question rarely has more that $2000 in it so even if JSL>>>>> the message were intercepted, I wouldn't lose very much. The account has no JSL>>>>> overdraft protection. JSL>>>>> So I wondered, i

Re: OTF encryption

essage were intercepted, I wouldn't lose very much. The account has no JSL>>>> overdraft protection. JSL>>>> So I wondered, is it possible to send an encrypted email to someone who has no JSL>>>> encryption in use on his email client? If so, how? PB>&

Re: OTF encryption

ft protection. JSL>>> So I wondered, is it possible to send an encrypted email to someone who has no JSL>>> encryption in use on his email client? If so, how? PB>> I use 7-zip to create a self-extracting zip file wilth password and PB>> then email it. JSL> But t

Re: OTF encryption

ccount in question rarely has more that $2000 in it so even if JSL>> the message were intercepted, I wouldn't lose very much. The account has no JSL>> overdraft protection. JSL>> So I wondered, is it possible to send an encrypted email to someone who has no JSL>> enc

Re: OTF encryption

the message were intercepted, I wouldn't lose very much. The account has no JSL> overdraft protection. JSL> So I wondered, is it possible to send an encrypted email to someone who has no JSL> encryption in use on his email client? If so, how? I use 7-zip to create a self-extracting z

OTF encryption

red, is it possible to send an encrypted email to someone who has no encryption in use on his email client? If so, how? -- TIA, Jack LaRosa Using TB! 6.0.12 OS: Win 10 v6 Build: 9200 Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL

Draft messages and GnuPG encryption - Have these issues been fixed?

Hi Are these issues with Draft messages and GnuPG encryption that exist in my TB! Version 4.0.38 still present in the latest release? Or have Ritlabs fixed them? 1. Messages configured to be encrypted on completion are not encrypted when saved/autosaved as drafts. 2. Messages that

Re: Encryption concerns

Hello Robert, On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 13:33:20 -0400 GMT (10-Sep-13, 00:33 +0700 GMT), Robert D. wrote: >> It must be clear by now the that US National Security Agency--as well >> as the comparable security agencies in every other civilized country >> in the world--can break all en

Re: Encryption

; TB in the S/Mime TLS preferences window. Play around with the various settings and see what happens; there are not all that many options. Some will be more secure than others but, for the time being, anything is probably better than no encryption. Just remember to keep a tick in "

Re: Encryption

Hi MFPA, thanks for the info. > As an alternative to OpenPGP, another email encryption method The Bat! > can handle is called S/MIME. S/MIME I've found the Comodo site to get a free s/mime certificate. But I don't understand configuring it in TB in the S/Mime TLS preferences

Re: Encryption concerns - it was meant as humor

>What i sent was meant as humor, a joke. I was not serious. I got it - they keep my passwords right next to my colonoscopy :D -- Rick No one can earn a million dollars honestly. - William Jennings Bryan v5.4.8 on Windows 6.2 Build 9200 Using all POP accounts I download all images _

Re: Encryption concerns - it was meant as humor

> Hello Mike, > Monday, September 9, 2013, 10:57:59 AM, you wrote: >> It must be clear by now the that US National Security Agency--as well >> as the comparable security agencies in every other civilized country >> in the world--can break all encryption codes and most li

Re: Encryption concerns

Hello Mike, Monday, September 9, 2013, 10:57:59 AM, you wrote: > It must be clear by now the that US National Security Agency--as well > as the comparable security agencies in every other civilized country > in the world--can break all encryption codes and most likely were > involve

Encryption concerns

Why is everyone so concerned about encrypting their email? It must be clear by now the that US National Security Agency--as well as the comparable security agencies in every other civilized country in the world--can break all encryption codes and most likely were involved in setting up the

Re: Encryption

in transit. You can sign or encrypt or both.) As an alternative to OpenPGP, another email encryption method The Bat! can handle is called S/MIME. S/MIME probably has a less-steep learning curve than OpenPGP, and there are probably more people using S/MIME-capable email applications - although many/

Re: Encryption

Hi On Saturday 7 September 2013 at 10:55:53 AM, in , Gunivortus Goos wrote: > I didn't find out how to get GNP-pgp work in The Bat. > TB does see the program, but not a Key Manager and I > wasn't able to create keys. When you say "GNP-pgp" do you mean GnuPG (also known as GPG)? If yes, did yo

Re: Encryption

Hi Paul, thanks for the reply. > (Forget about GnuGPG) I didn't find out how to get GNP-pgp work in The Bat. TB does see the program, but not a Key Manager and I wasn't able to create keys. It seems the typical Linux handling I've experienced also with other programs... too much related kn

Re: Encryption

Hello TBUDL@thebat., Saturday, September 7, 2013, 1:07:20 AM, you wrote: GG> Hi, GG> is there a kind of encryption which don't need at first reading a long GG> documentation? GG> I've installed GNU-pgp but simply don't know how to go further. GG> I've skimmed

Encryption

Hi, is there a kind of encryption which don't need at first reading a long documentation? I've installed GNU-pgp but simply don't know how to go further. I've skimmed the documentation, but didn't get a clue. Isn't there a software which automatically encrypts ma

Re[2]: The Bat pro & encryption

Hello Marek, In other words, the Batpro is more secure. Thanks, Jean >> Setting an access password for each account is already possible in the >> Bat Home. > in non-encrypted msgbase, You can set access password for every account, > but there is no encryption of files, tho

Re: The Bat pro & encryption

Hello all, Friday, June 19, 2009, Jean Lai Kan wrote: > Setting an access password for each account is already possible in the > Bat Home. in non-encrypted msgbase, You can set access password for every account, but there is no encryption of files, those are in plain or binary mode.

Re[2]: The Bat pro & encryption

Hello Marek, Friday, June 19, 2009, 10:56:08 AM, you wrote: > Hello all, > Friday, June 19, 2009, Jean Lai Kan wrote: >> Does the encryption feature of the Bat 4 Pro allows us to password >> individual messages in the In-box, Out-box etc? > no, one masterpassword is used

Re: The Bat pro & encryption

Hello all, Friday, June 19, 2009, Jean Lai Kan wrote: > Does the encryption feature of the Bat 4 Pro allows us to password > individual messages in the In-box, Out-box etc? no, one masterpassword is used for all accounts and folders, address books and configuration files. -- Bye Marek

The Bat pro & encryption

Hi All, Does the encryption feature of the Bat 4 Pro allows us to password individual messages in the In-box, Out-box etc? Thanks John Current version is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: One time encryption

am Freitag, 19. September 2008 um 18:43 schrieb Jernej Simončič: >> On Friday, September 19, 2008, 16:50:43, Jens Franik wrote: >> Licence: Shareware > You should always be wary of security programs that don't use open > encryption standards You are right! -- Mit f

Re: One time encryption

On Friday, September 19, 2008, 16:50:43, Jens Franik wrote: > Licence: Shareware You should always be wary of security programs that don't use open encryption standards (this doesn't just mean that the program uses eg. AES algorithm for encryption, but that you can use anothe

Re: One time encryption

gt; recipient? Or am I worrying about nothing? I would also worry about sending Credit Card Info in Plain Text ;-) As you were already told, a fax could be an alternative. If you both (sender/recipient) have Windows, you might try Free Portable Encryption/Decryption Software - PicoCrypt (http

Re: One time encryption

ple out there who do worry about these things, and I'm grateful for that. I like to think that I generally understand the risks and that I'm reasonably prudent in how I exchange information. I'm glad there are secure transmission protocols, encryption mechanisms, trusted sites and all ki

Re: One time encryption

Hello Gene, On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:31:07 -0400 GMT (19/09/2008, 03:31 +0700 GMT), Gene Brown wrote: >> Yes, anything is possible for a dedicated criminal or legal agency. My >> point was the physical access, which means somebody has to be there. >> With hacking on the internet, the criminal can b

Re: One time encryption

On Thursday, September 18, 2008, 12:37:05 PM, you wrote: > Yes, anything is possible for a dedicated criminal or legal agency. My > point was the physical access, which means somebody has to be there. > With hacking on the internet, the criminal can be anywhere in the > world. Sure, but is it wor

Re: One time encryption

Hello Jernej, On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:19:08 +0200 GMT (18/09/2008, 03:19 +0700 GMT), Jernej Simončič wrote: >> True. But the eavesdropper needs to have physical access to the >> appropriate cable at least once, while email can be hacked remotely. JS> Which is much easier to get than you imagine -

Re[2]: One time encryption

My last msg in this thread, comments below as required. Thursday, September 18, 2008, 7:36:43 AM, you wrote: >> Most US banks put it on by default. > Fair enough. We don't get that in the UK. My phone number is private > and not the bank's or the payee's business unless I decide otherwise. Of c

Re: One time encryption

Hi On Thursday 18 September 2008 at 1:46:19 PM, in , Dan Lester wrote: >> Phone number? On a cheque? > Most US banks put it on by default. Fair enough. We don't get that in the UK. My phone number is private and not the bank's or the payee's business unless I decide otherwise. > In the past,

Re[2]: One time encryption

Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 4:15:40 PM, you wrote: > Hi > On Wednesday 17 September 2008 at 8:13:23 PM, in > , Dan Lester wrote: >> When they write the check they cross out the phone number on it > Phone number? On a cheque? Most US banks put it on by default. In the past, at least, stores

Re: One time encryption

Hi On Wednesday 17 September 2008 at 9:30:02 PM, in , Jernej Simoncic wrote: > Interesting. Checks vanished practically overnight here when banks > stopped giving guarantee on them about 15 years ago, and everything > moved to electronic transactions. Lots of shops etc here don't take cheques a

Re: One time encryption

Hi On Wednesday 17 September 2008 at 8:13:23 PM, in , Dan Lester wrote: > When they write the check they cross out the phone number on it Phone number? On a cheque? -- Best regards, MFPA Don't talk unless you can improve on the silence Using The Bat! v4.0.34 on

Re: One time encryption

Hi On Wednesday 17 September 2008 at 10:25:14 PM, in , Ian A. White wrote: > The reason no one ever blames a phishing scam for the loss of their > secure data is because banks and other financial institutions will not > cover you if you volunteer the information. And just maybe because they don

Re[2]: One time encryption

Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 2:30:02 PM, you wrote: > On Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 21:13:23, Dan Lester wrote: >> Three years. My wife handles the money, and she now pays almost >> everything electronically, except for a couple that won't handle that. >> Those get dropped at the post offi

Re: One time encryption

On Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 21:13:23, Dan Lester wrote: > Three years. My wife handles the money, and she now pays almost > everything electronically, except for a couple that won't handle that. > Those get dropped at the post office. Interesting. Checks vanished practically overnight here

Re: One time encryption

On Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 18:15:58, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > True. But the eavesdropper needs to have physical access to the > appropriate cable at least once, while email can be hacked remotely. Which is much easier to get than you imagine - most buildings have the phone exchange somewh

Re[2]: One time encryption

Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 9:32:52 AM, you wrote: >> As a side note, but an important ond, DO NOT PUT YOUR MAIL IN A BOX IN >> FRONT OF YOUR HOUSE for the letter carrier to pick up. Your mail can >> be taken by a crook and your identity and/or money stolen. > You mean your own postbox or ...

Re: One time encryption

Hi On Wednesday 17 September 2008 at 5:22:25 PM, in , Thomas Fernandez wrote: > No such EPOS terminals exist over here. The credit card still > disappears with the waiter for a couple of minutes. Even in the old days of the "machine" you put the card on, placed a form over the top and slid the

Re: One time encryption

Hello MFPA, On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 19:41:51 +0100 GMT (17/09/2008, 01:41 +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: >> Is the internet really any riskier than how I use the card every >> day? M> Unlikely to be riskier than allowing people to wander off with it. M> Several years since I saw that - these days they usua

Re: One time encryption

under your mattress yet? >> In addition, the image format that fax uses is pretty effective as >> an encryption measure even though it's a published standard. A >> casual snooper isn't likely to have the necessary tools... JS> Much more likely to have them than anyth

Re: One time encryption

On Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 17:05:59, Dan Lester wrote: > As a side note, but an important ond, DO NOT PUT YOUR MAIL IN A BOX IN > FRONT OF YOUR HOUSE for the letter carrier to pick up. Your mail can > be taken by a crook and your identity and/or money stolen. You mean your own postbox or

Re[2]: One time encryption

Monday, September 15, 2008, 6:53:21 PM, you wrote: > Is the internet really any riskier than how I use the card every > day? Actually the internet is much safer. As you point out, you give the card to all sorts of people. And then there are the people you give it to on the phone...and on and on

Re: One time encryption

ually quite easy to eavesdrop on phone - you just need to connect a cable at the appropriate place. Once you do that, it's not even that hard to intercept faxes. > In > addition, the image format that fax uses is pretty effective as an > encryption measure even though it's a publis

Re: One time encryption

Although, of course, the other end may use fax software on a PC... > In addition, the image format that fax uses is pretty effective as > an encryption measure even though it's a published standard. A > casual snooper isn't likely to have the necessary tools... The casual snooper ma

Re: One time encryption

Hi On Tuesday 16 September 2008 at 1:53:21 AM, in , Gene Brown wrote: > On Monday, September 15, 2008, 4:23:31 PM, you wrote: > When I use a credit card in a restaurant, I give it to the waiter > and he disappears for several minutes. > Is the internet really any riskier than how I u

Re: One time encryption

Hi On Tuesday 16 September 2008 at 12:19:26 PM, in , Gunivortus Goos wrote: >And in a strange turn of events, the cat was electrocuted. Poor cat. What happened? -- Best regards, MFPA Nothing a Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster won't cure! Using The Bat! v4.0.

Re: One time encryption

Hello, Jack-- On Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 1:37:33 PM, you wrote: GB>> Is the internet really any riskier than how I use the card every GB>> day? > It's called Web Paranoia and it's probably completely un-justified. > You're right in everything you say. Ultimately, we decided to just > conduc

Re: One time encryption

Hello Gene, Monday, September 15, 2008, 7:53:21 PM, you wrote: GB> On Monday, September 15, 2008, 4:23:31 PM, you wrote: >> Or am I worrying about nothing? GB> Maybe I've naive, but I've never had a problem with doing this. If GB> you send your credit card number to the vendor, what happens to

Re: One time encryption

gt; message as "interesting" by including an easy to spot encryption ND> header or similar. Some people allege that "governments" only filter ND> encrypted traffic, on the assumption that that's how "terrorists" are ND> communicating. On that subje

Re: One time encryption

Hello Privateofcourse, Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 5:21:19 AM, you wrote: P> Hello Jack, P> This is what you said on Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:23:31 -0500 your time: >> Is there an easy way to encrypt the info so it can't be read if it's >> intercepted in transit and yet *can* be read by the recipie

Re: One time encryption

d practices in different countries differ. Back to the original question, I don't think the average vendor will go through the procedures of a one-time encryption. If they don't have a secure website and thus aren't security-conscious, submit your CC details by phone and worry abou

Re: One time encryption

rienced, they're obviously encrypted. I was referring to POTS (plain old telephone service), not IP telephony (which is about as hard to tap into as other internet communications; note that Skype's encryption isn't to be trusted). -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><

Re[2]: One time encryption

Hi Jernej Simončič, > Note that listening in on phone conversations (and fax communications) > is much easier than intercepting even unencrypted communication over > the internet. Except for Skype's IP-phonecalls, I experienced, they're obviously encrypted. And in a strange turn of even

Re: One time encryption

On Monday, September 15, 2008, 22:23:31, Jack S. LaRosa wrote: > I need to send credit card info to a vendor in payment for a part yet > to be shipped. Is there an easy way to encrypt the info so it can't be > read if it's intercepted in transit and yet *can* be read by the > recipient? Or am I wo

Re: One time encryption

L> recipient? Or am I worrying about nothing? Some people, myself included, think that the anonymity offered by the sheer scale of the Internet outweighs the risk of identifying your message as "interesting" by including an easy to spot encryption header or similar. Some people alleg

Re: One time encryption

DF file. Lots of software available for free for that. There is Steganos LockNote (free) which fits this role perfectly. Although you'll have to rar or zip the bare exe file as it may not get delivered. PGP / GnuPG, but that is dependent on the recipient already being familiar with this form o

Re: One time encryption

On Monday, September 15, 2008, 4:23:31 PM, you wrote: > Or am I worrying about nothing? Maybe I've naive, but I've never had a problem with doing this. If you send your credit card number to the vendor, what happens to it after that? How does the vendor secure it? When I use a credit card in a r

Re: One time encryption

Hi Jack, On Monday, September 15, 2008 at 4:23:31 PM you wrote: JSL> Fellow list members, JSL> I need to send credit card info to a vendor in payment for a part yet JSL> to be shipped. Is there an easy way to encrypt the info so it can't be JSL> read if it's intercepted in transit and yet *can*

Re: One time encryption

s is pretty effective as an encryption measure even though it's a published standard. A casual snooper isn't likely to have the necessary tools... -- Jim Kyle Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A with AntiSpamSniper Version 2.7.1.5 __

One time encryption

Fellow list members, I need to send credit card info to a vendor in payment for a part yet to be shipped. Is there an easy way to encrypt the info so it can't be read if it's intercepted in transit and yet *can* be read by the recipient? Or am I worrying about nothing? -- TIA, Jack LaRosa

Re: Encryption

Hello Alto! On Thursday, January 18, 2007, 2:42 PM, you wrote: >>> BTW, does the current version of TheBat work with PGP Desktop v9? MB>> Sorry, I can't help with that. I would bet that the issue is MB>> *not* resolved. > Oh, well. To be honest there's not much of a reason for me to switch > fr

Re[2]: Encryption

Guten Morgen, MM> PGP9 is not supported right now, AFAIK it is planned. Thank you for the info. -- MfG, Altomailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpebfPImbImp.pgp Description: PGP signature Current version is 3.95.06 | 'Using T

Re: Encryption

Hello all, Wednesday, January 17, 2007, Alto Speckhardt wrote: > BTW, does the current version of TheBat work with PGP Desktop v9? The > v8 version has no issues, but didn't a file get renamed with v9 so > that TheBat wouldn't recognize it any more? Did that issue get > resolved since? PGP9 is no

Re[2]: Encryption

Guten Morgen, >> BTW, does the current version of TheBat work with PGP Desktop v9? MB> Sorry, I can't help with that. I would bet that the issue is *not* MB> resolved. Oh, well. To be honest there's not much of a reason for me to switch from PGP v8 to v9 anyway. ;-) MB> If I enter a wish on Bu

Re: Encryption

Hello Alto! On Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 10:48 AM, you wrote: > BTW, does the current version of TheBat work with PGP Desktop v9? > The v8 version has no issues, but didn't a file get renamed with v9 > so that TheBat wouldn't recognize it any more? Did that issue get > resolved since? Sorry,

Re: Encryption

Hi Mary, BTW, does the current version of TheBat work with PGP Desktop v9? The v8 version has no issues, but didn't a file get renamed with v9 so that TheBat wouldn't recognize it any more? Did that issue get resolved since? > But, be aware, that if you save a message in The Bat! as draft, whic

Re: Encryption

Hello Jack! On Tuesday, January 16, 2007, 6:02 PM, you wrote: > With this new-found knowledge you've provided I now assume that PGP > or some other encryption utility could be used to completely encrypt > (make un-readable) any email message. True? True. I use PGP to encrypt priv

Re: Encryption

Hello Chris, Monday, January 15, 2007, 8:17:08 PM, you wrote: CW> Jack S. LaRosa @ 2007-1-15 5:57:15 PM CW> "Encryption" >> While I'm not into black helicopters as a rule, I do lean towards >> lending some credence to what I've read about Google's

Re: Encryption

Jack S. LaRosa @ 2007-1-15 5:57:15 PM "Encryption" > While I'm not into black helicopters as a rule, I do lean towards > lending some credence to what I've read about Google's data-mining > practices and how easily it could be subverted. It occurred to me >

Encryption

t Google's data-mining practices and how easily it could be subverted. It occurred to me that perhaps that might be one reason why some people on this list seem to use encryption, but since I'm always able to view correspondence from this list without any decryption that I'm aware of, I

Re: Copy from Regular to OTF Encryption

Roelof, On 25-10-2006 19:52, you wrote in : PF>> I would like to copy my tbuser.def from a non-encrypted version of PF>> TB to an encrypted one. > That should happen when you're using OTFE, check for a tbuser.eef > file. (When you're currently running plain, create a TB-style backup, > uninstal

Re: Copy from Regular to OTF Encryption

Hallo Peter, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:25:11 +0200GMT (25-10-2006, 17:25 , where I live), you wrote: PF> I would like to copy my tbuser.def from a non-encrypted version of TB PF> to an encrypted one. That should happen when you're using OTFE, check for a tbuser.eef file. (When you're currently ru

Re: Copy from Regular to OTF Encryption

Hello Peter, On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:25:11 +0200 GMT (25/10/2006, 22:25 +0700 GMT), Peter Fjelsten wrote: PF> I would like to copy my tbuser.def from a non-encrypted version of TB PF> to an encrypted one. PF> Can this be done? Try and let us know the outcome. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. "You s

Copy from Regular to OTF Encryption

TheBat-users, I would like to copy my tbuser.def from a non-encrypted version of TB to an encrypted one. Can this be done? -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.85.03 Pro MyGate, AVG 2 POP3, 14 IMAP (Courier) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 200K+ msgs. Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack

Re: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did you configure BayesIt properly? (Told it where to find its files?) That was the problem. It seems that when you tell the installer to move the MAIL directory elsewhere, Bayesit will still think its configuration information is in the default MAIL loca

Re: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

Hallo Max, On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 02:59:04 + (UTC)GMT (12-2-2006, 3:59 +0100, where I live), you wrote: M> I should have been clearer in my original message. The problem is that these M> notices do not go away. They occur everytime I start The Bat!. I've followed M> their instructions and specif

Re: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, it's correct about you using an encrypted message base, so just > do what it tells you to do. I can remember having to do the same when > I started with OTFE, back then I was still using BayesIt. I should have been clearer in my original message. T

Mod: Cut mark (was: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption)

Hallo Max, On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:13:39 + (UTC)GMT (11-2-2006, 13:13 +0200, where I live), you wrote: M> Does anyone have any idea on what I need to do to get rid of these messages? My M> searches have yielded nothing. M> Thanks! M> M> Curr

Re: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

Hallo Max, On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:13:39 + (UTC)GMT (11-2-2006, 13:13 +0100, where I live), you wrote: M> The first says: "It seems that you use encrypted The Bat! Please, provide the M> minimal value from "Move to junk folder" and "delete letter" (see "Preferences > M> Antispam" menu in The

Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

Hi all, Today I upgraded to the latest version of TB! and enabled on-the-fly encryption. Now when I start TB!, I am prompted to enter the OFTE password. After doing so, I receive 2 warning notices related to Bayesit. The first says: "It seems that you use encrypted The Bat! Please, provid

Re: On the fly encryption password

Hello Darrin, Friday, June 17, 2005, 7:03:23 PM, you wrote: > So I guess I > need to make a backup of my files, uninstall TB and reinstall with > OTFE and then import my backup. Is this the correct steps to take? Thats what I went ahead and did and it works fine now. :) -- Best regards, Darri

Re: On the fly encryption password

Hello Peter, Friday, June 17, 2005, 12:01:55 PM, you wrote: > Have a look at the lower right part of TB!'s main window. "Plain" > means unencrypted, and "On-the-fly PWD" means encrypted. But as Roelof > pointed out, it would be hard to miss the password prompt, so I guess > your entry is "Plain".

Re: On the fly encryption password

Hi Darrin, on Fri, 17 Jun 2005 07:37:39 -0700GMT (17.06.2005, 16:37 +0200GMT here), you wrote: D> If I remember correctly, at the installation of TB, I chose the On D> the fly encryption. It also said something about a password. I D> havent seen any option that allows me t

Re: On the fly encryption password

Hallo Darrin, On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 07:37:39 -0700GMT (17-6-2005, 16:37 +0200, where I live), you wrote: D> If I remember correctly, at the installation of TB, I chose the On D> the fly encryption. It also said something about a password. I D> havent seen any option that allows me t

On the fly encryption password

Hello TBUDL, If I remember correctly, at the installation of TB, I chose the On the fly encryption. It also said something about a password. I havent seen any option that allows me to input a password. How does that work? When does it ask me about a password or where do I input one. Is

Re: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25

Hello Manuel, On Wednesday, June 8, 2005 at 12:03:23 PM Manuel [MB] wrote: >>> Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too. >> >> Or even, that _line_. MB> I thought of _h_int. ;) *l*ined h*int* = *lint* ;-) Seems to be fair for all to me ;-) --

Re: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25

Wednesday, June 8, 2005, MFPA wrote: > On Wednesday 8 June 2005 at 8:27:25 AM, in > , Tony Boom wrote: >> Did you read below my signature line? > Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too. Hey, Lint for e-mail wou

Re: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25

Hi MFPA, --<> 08.06.2005 10:59 +0100: Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too. Or even, that _line_. I thought of _h_int. ;) -- Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de Current version is

Re: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25

Hi On Wednesday 8 June 2005 at 10:31:59 AM, in , MFPA wrote: > Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too. Or even, that _line_. -- Best regards, MFPA Put knot yore trust inn spel chequer

Re: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25

Hi On Wednesday 8 June 2005 at 8:27:25 AM, in , Tony Boom wrote: > Did you read below my signature line? Very good illustration. I missed that lint, too. -- Best regards, MFPA Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative Using The

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: On The Fly Encryption 3.5.25)

Hi On Tuesday 7 June 2005 at 10:18:45 AM, in , Tim Bicknelle wrote: Roelof>> Top posting, i.e., typing all your reply text at the top of your Roelof>> message and following it with all quoted text below, is not Roelof>> encouraged and we actually request that you not do so

  1   2   3   >