Hello O.,
A reminder of what O. Martin Moran typed on:
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 12:47:02 GMT -0700
OMM Thanks for the reply. I have both of those set to HTML only and it still
doesn't
OMM work. Any other ideas?
On a message that has is HTML there should be a little globe with a
Hi Chris,
On Wednesday, 15 November, 2006 at 9:54:36 PM you wrote:
So I learned that while holding Ctrl+Enter, the mail that's in
focus is sent. Whoops!
I have re-mapped Ctrl+Enter to Put in outbox and Shift+F2 to Send
Now for that reason (among other).
Well, I should have left well enough
Hi George,
On Wednesday, 15 November, 2006 at 4:32:34 PM you wrote:
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF Put your cursor in the mail and hit crtl+. This will increase
TF the size.
Well. That's much easier than what I proposed. I actually tried
variations like that but they don't work on my laptop.
How can I display/insert a picture automatically? I'm not talking about
the attachment macro but really showing it. I can doe this manually by
starting a new message and selecting type HTML. From the toolbar that
then appears I can use the insert function.
ASK You can not use HTML in
Hello Alexander,
Friday, January 14, 2005, 11:23:27 AM, you wrote and sent the following:
Nothing. Its a long standing bug. Very annoying.
See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=1807
...submitted October 2003 *sigh*
That's a shame.
--
Andrew
Using The Bat! 3.0.1.33
On Windows XP,
Hello all,
Is it possible to create HTML templates?. I need to add an image (logo)
in my signature. AFAIK it's only possible to create plain text templates,
but maybe (I hope) I missed something.
this is not possible right now, but HTML templates are planned.
Any idea when?. Within a
Hello all,
Marc Is it possible to create HTML templates?
No, which is a PITA.
But we've got smileys, which is clearly what you want in an email client
rather than actual functionality...
Do You really think, changing core of templates system is easier than
smileys support? This will be
Hello Roelof,
Tuesday, July 6, 2004, 5:00:24 PM, you wrote:
RO You can't use html sjablones for TB.
Any idea if this is planned and/or even possible to implement?
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 2.12 Beta/7
Hi Robin,
raoca This didn't occur, but because you didn't send your message as HTML. I
raoca have experienced it often, that a message written in HTML and containing
raoca the character (coded as amp; in the HTML) loses this in the reply. In
raoca general TB! is not good at quoting text that was
Hi All,
JC 1. If I click on an html link in the message preview window, it simply
JC goes to the top of the message. If I click on the link a second time,
JC 2. If I reply to a message which contains a html link and quote the
JC original text, then all instances of the '' character (without the
Hi All,
I believe that we can agree with my first point that clicking on a
HTML link in the preview pane takes you to the top of the message on
the first click and then opens the browser on the second. I assume
that this is a bug and not a feature?
As for the '' characters in a HTML link when
Hello Ian,
You wrote:
Ian A. White Mamuka,
Ian A. White On Wednesday, May 12, 2004, 7:40:12 PM,
Ian A. White you (Mamuka Khantadze) wrote:
MK Hello People,
MK I have very wierd (to me) situation. I've set up HTML to be my
MK defaulght email editor. It works fine but the Bat doesn't
Hi Alexander,
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 9:27:37 AM, you wrote:
dcn My problem is this; I am running the latest version of TB! 2 and I still
dcn can't send html messages. Whenever I create a new message and choose either of
dcn the html format options all is fine until I press send.
AL
Hi Allie,
Sunday, February 22, 2004, 11:20:56 AM, you wrote:
AM When do you choose the format?
AM What I did was to open the editor and the first thing I did was to go
AM to the Options menu and select Message Format//HTML only
AM I filled in the header information, tabbed into the message
Hello daveiw,
Friday, December 19, 2003, 10:26:17 AM, you wrote:
dcn Hi all,
dcn I am now using the xmas edition of v2 and would like to
dcn send out some snazzy emails to my kids, but everytime I create an
dcn email using html and click 'send' - nothing happens, I mean I can
dcn see that
Hi Mark,
Thursday, December 18, 2003, 2:13:28 PM, you wrote:
MP Hello dave,
MP Thursday, December 18, 2003, 1:39:26 PM, you wrote:
dcn Many thanks in advance,
MP Now, does this reach you the way it should?
MP Only adding some animated gifs and playing with colors...
MP Stillsome work
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:23:11 +0200, Marek Mikus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 2.01 version will be possible to selecect HTML as default in
Preferences and AFAIK macros for selecting message type are planned.
Thank you for this info.
The macros would do well too (I didn't think of that option), but
Hi,
Leif Gregory wrote:
Please trim replies to context.
Oops, sorry, accidentally forgot to trim it this time...
Antje
Using The Bat! v2.00.6 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A
--
| Antje Lehmann
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version
On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, Roelof Otten wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RO First of all, I didn't test this. ;-) Create an incoming filter
RO for your Daily Dilbert Mail that extracts the attached file to
RO disk and let the same filter start an external program, in this
RO case your
Hi Miguel,
As I say, maybe I didn't understand a word of what this thread is all
about. But if I did... My goodness! All is needed is a double click!
I know, I know... but I'm a lazy person, you know ;-))) And I simply
thought there might be a way for me to not have to open the browser
every
Hi,
Roelof Otten wrote:
Hallo Joseph,
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 10:40:59 -0500GMT (17-9-03, 17:40 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
JN I didn't test your idea either, but it seems like a brilliant
JN approach.
I think that's a bit too much, but thanks anyhow. ;-)
JN If it were packaged in a way
Hi Roelof,
First of all, I didn't test this. ;-)
Create an incoming filter for your Daily Dilbert Mail that extracts
the attached file to disk and let the same filter start an external
program, in this case your browser with a parameter that makes it open
your attachment.
Since 'extract
Hi Thomas
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 2:38:04 PM, you wrote:
TF The internet was designed for plain-text emails only. MIME attachments
TF (allowing HTML) was added much later and under much protest. Check it
TF out on the internet.
The internet was not designed *for* email at all. The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Friday, September 12, 2003
12:50:16 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: HTML as default on v2.00 ...?
Greetings MAU,
On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 7:13:30 AM, you wrote:
MAU As you may have read a few days ago in a thread with subject My new 20
MAU
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 8:23:15 PM, Allie wrote:
A We are in the know and they're not. :)
You put a smiley there, but you're right! When Mosaic came out,
I was one of the first to stop using Gopher and Archie; the new
way was so much easier and quickly became more appealing.
A We know
On Thursday, September 11, 2003, Pixie wrote...
JA I don't use my comcast account for emails, I run my own server,
JA so it's easier to monkey with what I want. There is a possibility
JA that it
Do you happen to run that on a 'home' service? I've been thinking of
throwing a server back up.
Hello Marck,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 3:11:20 PM, you wrote:
MDP HTML was *never* developed or intended for use as a formatting
MDP system for email. It is a presentation system for served pages,
MDP intended for transmission with the HyperText Transfer Protocol
MDP (HTTP, yes?). Mail is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, September 09, 2003
4:23:19 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: HTML as default on v2.00 ...?
Greetings David,
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 2:54:05 PM, you wrote:
TF Your choice is costing me money.
D And exactly how much extra is it costing
Hallo Pixie,
On Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:56:57 -0400GMT (10-9-03, 12:56 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MW Anyway, in digest mode the header on my message looks fine to me.
P Does there happen to exist a command I can grab digests for the
P last day or two?
Not automatically. But you could ask
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 5:43:27 PM, Allister wrote:
A And if you can think of a case where this is so, could it be
A better handled by posting a web page, or PDF file, or
A attaching a PDF file to the email?
1. Acrobat Reader is not as universal as HTML even if it is a
free download.
2.
Hello all,
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
While that may be true, bugs are explored on TBBETA and expunged by
use of the BugTraq system (I don't know if that's back up yet).
yes, BT is up and running.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
It seems that David Boggon said ...
D Many end users don't know enough/have enough time/have the inclination
D to delve into the plain text display settings of their client, and so
D plain text messages with fixed width fonts and no bold italics and
D font sizes/colours look very plain indeed
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 10:08:21 AM, Jamie wrote:
I'm also terribly prejudiced against fonts, if you want me to think
you're a 5 year old feel free to use Comic Sans, otherwise use a
businesslike font. It's a pain for me to have to set things up so that
stupid unreadable fonts are
Hi Deborah
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 9:01:10 AM, you wrote:
DW - HTML slows the recipient's computer - not always noticeably, but it
DW always does.
Would you elaborate on this? Rendering might be slower, but the computer as a
whole? The rendering does not take up so much extra CPU power
Hi Marck
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 9:11:20 AM, you wrote:
D Hmmm. While some people who use HTML mail may abuse it, it is the
D spammers etc themselves who are at fault, not HTML, I think.
MDP That is not correct. The fault lies in the ability to write
MDP over-formatted messages.
I think
It seems that David Boggon said ...
TF Your choice is costing me money.
D And exactly how much extra is it costing you?
Does it matter? Doing something that you know costs someone else money is
rude, even if it's no more than one cent.
--
Bill Blinn Technology Editor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:14:57 PM, Thomas wrote:
T Your choice is costing me money.
Outlandish HTML e-mail (with the dangerous stuff filtered by TB!)
is mildly annoying. However, SPAM causes me much more heartache.
In the past 6 months, I've received ~15,000 e-mails. Of those
~7,000 are
At 5:43 PM on 9/9/2003, Allister Jenks typed ...
A I think everyone in this thread who is supporting the use of HTML in
A emails should read the HTML 4.01 specification - all of it. Then you
A will understand that HTML is a /semantic/ markup language. It is
A _*NOT*_ a presentation tool. And,
Hi Leif
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 2:17:47 PM, you wrote:
LGNow take the HTML mail to a global scale. $365 x millions and
LGeventually billions of people per year. Yeah, that's a serious
LGwaste of money.
Assuming, of course, that your estimations were correct. You said yourself
Hi Marck
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 12:13:35 PM, you wrote:
D Hmmm. While some people who use HTML mail may abuse it, it is
D the spammers etc themselves who are at fault, not HTML, I
D think.
MDP That is not correct. The fault lies in the ability to write
MDP over-formatted messages.
D I
Pixie-
Cool. I sneaked in under your virus check software? Got my mojo
working today...
Anyway, in digest mode the header on my message looks fine to me.
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 1:27:47 AM, Pixie wrote:
P about an hour or so ago a couple messages came in with this modified
P subject. Not just the thread I ripped the subject from but also 1
P or 2 others has it.
P ..just trying to see if my ISP has been monkeying with something on
P their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 09, 2003, Pixie wrote...
..just trying to see if my ISP has been monkeying with something on
their servers or if others on the list are also seeing the same.
I don't use my comcast account for emails, I run my own server, so
Hello Marck,
Sunday, June 1, 2003, 9:05:12 PM, you wrote:
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP Hash: SHA1
MDP Hi Cjc,
MDP @1-Jun-2003, 20:30 -0400 (01:30 UK time) CJC [C] in
MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
C The images in HTML messages are not showing. Just blank boxes with
C red X's..
Hello Allie,
Saturday, April 12, 2003, 5:57:01 PM, you wrote:
AM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
AM Hash: SHA1
AM Pete Holsberg [PH] wrote:
PH Some incoming messages are shown as having an HTML attachment even
PH when they do not!
AM The HTML attachment will appear once a message is sent
Marck-
Monday, February 24, 2003, 4:15:58 PM, you wrote:
MDP know. The place to have this discussion is surely TBBETA where
MDP Stefan can chip in with the facts.
I'll take this as a tame dead horse.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/4 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
--
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,
On or about Sunday, February 23, 2003 at 03:31:17GMT + (which was
10:31 PM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted:
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP Hash: SHA1
S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry?
MDP
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,
On or about Monday, February 24, 2003 at 14:19:39GMT + (which was
9:19 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted:
S mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Las Vegas Website Feedback
MDP Aha - are you talking about links in emails? That's different. The
MDP fix
Marck-
Monday, February 24, 2003, 7:30:00 AM, you wrote:
MDP You are quite right. That doesn't work at all. Why not use the link
MDP to explain the RFC to the webmaster? ;-)
grin One point for Marck.
But that *does* get us back on track. Here's what I (currently) think
about this:
Yes, the
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,
On or about Saturday, November 30, 2002 at 09:46:55GMT + (which
was 4:46 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted:
MDP In the definition lies the solution. There is a simple fix to all of
MDP this that involves neither TB nor the web site author:
Hello Marck D Pearlstone,
On or about Sunday, February 23, 2003 at 16:30:39GMT + (which was
11:30 AM in the tropics where I live) Marck D Pearlstone posted:
S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry?
MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command
Does this change require a reboot? I've had the
Marck-
Sunday, February 23, 2003, 8:30:39 AM, you wrote:
S Where EXACTLY in the registry is this entry?
MDP HKCR/mailto/shell/open/command
However, as I've mentioned before, this has absolutely *no* effect on
my Win2k system. I posted the question earlier to see if anyone else
could confirm or
On Sunday, February 9, 2003, 8:12:43 PM, Richard Wakeford wrote:
RW I know, I've worked in Belfast. In fact the last time I was there they
RW bombed the Europa hotel (as it was then) the day after we left :-)
It's still the Europa. No barbed wire fence around the front now
though. When were you
Hello Jurgen,
Saturday, February 8, 2003, 1:11:13 PM, you wrote:
JH LOL in some ways that reminds me of the good old times in the FIDO net
JH when the Amiga Users and the Atari ST Users were at each others
JH throats *sigh*
Why does it have to be either or. I vote for peaceful coexistence.
Hello marek,
Saturday, February 8, 2003, 2:25:47 PM, you wrote:
mj Allow me to respectfully disagree. I believe that before we move on,
mj we all should make independent, informed decisions about whether the
mj proposed direction is beneficial.
Ah! Therein lies the problem I see. I have not
Hello Roelof Otten,
On or about Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 19:55:31GMT +0100
(which was 1:55 PM in the tropics where I live) Roelof Otten
postulated:
RO OOTC Does anybody know a tool that downloads fidonet mail and
RO makes it accessible to TB? Since I've got a local
RO mailserver, it may
Hello Simon,
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 1:59:47 PM, you wrote:
S it would be completely foolish IMO to even begin to consider
S dumping TB! simply because of the inclusion of an option that you
S don't wish to make use of yourself.
I'd like to know what other mailer those who say they would
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 2:55:07 PM, you wrote:
I am very glad you didn't write this one here:
http://ccug.apcug.org/newsApr02.htm ;-)
:-) ... yeah... Imagine the flames it would set up here...rushing for
fireproof clothing.
Please continue to ask. I encourage you to write one on The
Marck-
I tested this with IE 5.00.3315.1000. I would have tried it with
Netscape as well, but I can't remember the javascript hack to get it
to launch an external mail client. Getting the double-quote thing to
work isn't a big priority for me, but it's a good trick to know about
if it works. I'm
Thomas-
Monday, December 2, 2002, 7:12:36 AM, you wrote:
TF Just a silly question: Did you close TB when you doctored the
TF registry?
Good point. I hadn't (I almost never do). Now I have, in fact I had
that machine off overnight. Brought it up this morning and still no
effect. Has anyone else
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 3:54:30 AM, you wrote:
Hi TBUDL,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, at 02:46:32 [GMT +0530] you wrote:
MD Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do
MD in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background
MD images...background sounds I know might be
Tuesday, December 3, 2002, 5:53:41 AM, you wrote:
Hello Mean,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 04:04:47 +0530 GMT (03/12/02, 05:34 +0700 GMT),
Mean Drake wrote:
MD Does the Bat! have any features to compose HTML mail like one would do
MD in Outlooklike have inline pictures or background
MD
Marck-
Saturday, November 30, 2002, 5:59:30 PM, you wrote:
MDP If you are confident with RegEdit, find the mailto key in
MDP HK_CLASSES. Navigate to the Command sub-key and edit the default to
MDP enclose the %1 parameter at the end of TB command line to be
MDP enclosed in double quotes.
No,
Jonathan-
The quotes *aren't* passed on to TB, it's true. But look at the second
url on the web page - it's formatted correctly with %20 in between the
words instead of spaces. TB does pick up the entire string. It just
doesn't handle the %20s properly.
Try this: right-click on the hi url and
Marck-
Saturday, November 30, 2002, 1:46:55 AM, you wrote:
MDP Malformed Mailto links work perfectly if the definition of mailto is
MDP changed in the registry to enclose %1 in double quotes.
Didn't change anything on my systems. I haven't seen this hack before
- can you be more specific about
Bats-
Bringing this back on topic again:
Friday, November 29, 2002, 5:45:50 PM, you wrote:
NJY You can see http://www.gummibears.nu/test.html for an example of one
NJY correct mailto, and one incorrect if you'd like to test for yourself.
The correctly formed url still is not handled correctly
Replying to your message of Friday, August 16, 2002, 10:44:05 AM:
TF No. With the POP protocol, can just download mails (or not). In any
TF case, a conversion could take place only after download.
Just a thought, it would save some bandwidth and maybe some
vulnerabilities.
--
Pete
Thursday, June 13, 2002, 9:41:04 AM, you wrote:
PL Hello Peter,
PL Thursday, June 13, 2002, 2:41:40 AM, you wrote:
PP As you can see in Paddys request there seem to be something left. Or Paddy
PP 's using an unfixed 6.0.
PP In the latter case Paddy should update Opera and give it another try
Dear Paddy,
Thursday, June 13, 2002 at 6:41:04 PM you wrote:
PL I am using 6.04.1120.
Is it a beta? I cannot see more than version 6.03 on their homepage.
--
Kind regards,
Britt Malka
|\/|
| \__/ |
\/\/
| |
\\ //
\ /
\/
... Stay thy hand, fair
Dear Roelof,
Monday, June 10, 2002 at 12:23:46 AM you wrote:
RO Check on 'Content-Type:text/html' in the kludges and use as action to
RO extract the attachments (that's what the html-part is) to a directory,
RO use the same folder to start a batch file (run external program) that
RO deletes
Dear Allie,
Monday, June 10, 2002 at 3:48:56 PM you wrote:
ACM Another way would be to use a MailServer.
I will consider this.
ACM I don't filter the ones that are
ACM multipart/mixed since they may contain worthwhile attachments such as
ACM images.
Oh, okay, thanks... Didn't know that.
--
Roelof,
Does the message show when you're viewing the source-code? (Press F9)
Yes, I can see both parts of the message in the source window, even
when I'm getting a blank viewer window.
-Don
--
Archives :
Hello Lars,
Sunday, January 13, 2002, 5:35:33 PM, you wrote:
LG Hi Colin,
LG On 13 Jan 2002 at 17:26:44 [GMT +], you wrote:
CG Parhaps, for the future, a nice touch would be to have a tab/button
CG that effectively launches iInternet Explorer to view the html.
LG What would you need a
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, January 13, 2002, 5:36:17 PM, you wrote:
TF Hello Colin,
TF On Sun, 13 Jan 2002 17:26:44 + GMT (14/01/02, 01:26 +0800 GMT),
TF Colin Grant wrote:
CG Parhaps, for the future, a nice touch would be to have a tab/button that
CG effectively launches iInternet Explorer to
Hello David,
Sunday, January 13, 2002, 5:40:12 PM, you wrote:
DvZ -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
DvZ Hash: SHA1
DvZ Hello Colin,
DvZ On 13 Jan 2002 at 17:26:44 +, Colin Grant [CG] wrote concerning
DvZ 'HTML based emails':
DvZ ...
CG Parhaps, for the future, a nice touch would be to
Hello Colin,
Sunday, January 13, 2002, 11:26:44 AM, you wrote:
CG Bat looks good except that when receiving emails with HTML
CG included (animated gifs etc), Bat shows the fields
CG (pics/graphics)within the incoming email as being blank.
CG Is this intentional or am I missing something?
1/13/2002 3:56:59 PM, Geordon VanTassle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all. I'm new to the list, so I figured no better way to join in than to fuel a
good controversy. :)
Gee, all I have to do is double-click on the attached HTML document
and it opens my browser. You might want to give that
Friday, January 11, 2002, 11:22:56 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
Another way would be to double click the HTML attachment - that's why
I like it displayed - and open it in your browser, which then can
connect to the Internet and GET the images.
But that doesn't work if it's a .MSG attachment,
Hello Marck,
5 Jan 2002, 3:58:30 PM, you wrote:
MDP It is understood that TB V2 may eventually provide an option that
MDPwill cover this.
Am I wrong that we've been waiting for this for a long time?
Love to be able to read Japanese/Korean/Chinese characters
Love to be able to compose
On 1/5/2002 at 3:51 PM, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
Sadly is about how many people go over the top as soon as they get
their hands on rich text formatting. Suddenly everyone's sending HTML
mails (and it is HTML mail we're talking about here, not merely RTF,
which is at the same time both a
On 12/24/2001, Lars Geiger wrote:
Sorry, no setting. It's intended behavior, as showing graphics which
are not embedded into an email poses a security risc. This can be used
to track the time when you read a certain email, for example. Or many
other nasty things.
TB should have an option
Saturday, December 01, 2001, 11:23:43 AM, Peter Smitt wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly. My experience is that 99% of the people who
use html in their mails even don't know that they do so. They are just
the victims of the default options of Outlook. Spammers use html
deliberately, but I don't
Hi Alastair,
On samedi 1 décembre 2001 at 13:39:37, you wrote :
AS (I'm currently using Becky!; although it has vices, most notably a poor
AS editor, plugin support is one area in which it is better than TB!
AS Particularly good is a plugin which supports reading and posting of
AS news; the
Peter,
On Friday, November 30, 2001, 3:51:41 PM, you wrote:
PM I don't think so, Nick. There are too many Outlook (Express) users around.
PM I do like to be able to see their style, though I despise HTML in mails
PM generally.
One of the reasons I switched to The Bat! from Pegasus was
because
On 11/30/2001, Peter Meyns wrote:
I don't think so, Nick. There are too many Outlook (Express) users
around. I do like to be able to see their style, though I despise
HTML in mails generally. I agree with you in so far as TB! shouldn't
implement creating HTML mails. This should never be
At 12:47 AM 01/12/01, Don Zeigler wrote:
The Bat *needs* to be able to compose in html format. As far as
viewing html mails, we should have the option of using the Bat's
built-in limited viewer (which is enought for my own needs, anyhow) or
selecting Microsoft's viewer if we want to see the mail
Hi Nick,
I'm not a big fan of HTML e-mail and I guess that is why I use
the-bat. Someone suggested deselecting the show HTML automatically,
which I tried, but I have since received another message and I don't
see any difference. It did not have the black print on a medium gray
background.
I may have to recant my previous statement. I think, since changing
the display HTML Part of Message, that the HTML messages are opening
in the 1 tab and therefore doing away with the medium gray
background with the black type. I hope this is the way all will come
in. A thank you much to
Hi Dennis J. Alcover,
On 6/19/01 at 21:58:49GMT -0500 (which was 7:58 PM where I live) Dennis J.
Alcover wrote regarding the subject of: HTML files trouble
D As a matter of fact, I've been chasing this for a while. If you open
D the message, is everything blank (including To/From/Subject)?
Hi Thomas F,
On 6/19/01 at 11:08:05GMT +0800 (which was 8:08 PM where I live) Thomas F
wrote regarding the subject of: HTML files trouble
PFS The files download, but nothing shows up except the From, To, Subject,
PFS Time etc. That's it nothing else no message at all. Then if I close The
PFS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Lars
On 13 April 2001 at 10:23:57 +0200 (which was 09:23 where I live) Lars
Geiger wrote or so historians believe
First of all, there is no name for the attachment anywhere.
True.
That reminds me of a thread some time ago about the
--
On Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 11:12:08 PM, Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote:
AGSAA Personally I don't think you're going against the rules of this ML when
AGSAA you're trying to discuss some topics like one you were raised. However
AGSAA this particular
Hello Austin,
Monday, January 08, 2001, 6:28:05 PM, you wrote:
AD Hi
What do you mean by saying that? Do you _really_ want that all that
.html .ra .qt .scr .swf attachments will
render/play/saving-your-screen/etc. upon the message view?
I would just like a HTML message to display all of
Hi Kent
I would just like a HTML message to display all of the images :
Me too. :)
Austin
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
Hello
Thursday, December 07, 2000, 8:58:37 AM, someone claiming to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, at 22:36:54 h [GMT +0100]
you wrote this about "HTML Mails":
TS Hello TBUDL,
TS I myself don't like HTML mails but one of my customers wants me to
TS send
Hello
Saturday, December 09, 2000, 10:58:10 PM, someone claiming to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[..]
JP Question:- Any way to make as default when an HTML message is
JP received, that Bat! only opens the plain text version, instead of two
JP versions?
Go to the Options menu and be sure
15/09/2000, Steve Lamb:
Aside from templates what does TB! really do better?
Hi all.
I'm pretty new to TB, used Pegasus Mail and Eudora for years, and the
main reason why I gave up with PM is that you can't have any copy of
actually sent messages, but only [multiple] copies of queued ones
Hello Marck and all,
Thursday, September 14, 2000, 5:54:55 PM, you wrote:
While you can (with a great deal of effort), it is not part of the TB
remit to cover HTML mail creation. There are a number of other
products which do this. There are also a large majority of dedicated
TB
Hello Steve,
Thursday, September 14, 2000, 1:29:02 PM, you wrote:
SL On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 01:22:21AM +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
My main argument is always the waste of bandwidth (and that I find
emails with different fonts and colours offensive or just plain ugly,
but that's certainly
On Thursday, September 14, 2000, 10:10:51 AM, you wrote:
SL has better sorting
What is better?
ztrader
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
