Hello Eddie,
> Thanks now it works. My mistake was that when re-filtering I the two
> boxes 'read messages' and 'replied messages' under rules had a mark. I
> was assuming that I don't need to mark 'incoming mail'.
If as I am assuming you are filtering on mail just arriving from the
internet, I
Hi Christopher,
On Monday, January 21, 2008 at 12:09:16 AM you wrote:
C> Thomas Fernandez @ 2008-1-20 7:56:57 PM
C> "Filter Help"
>> Please post the filters without the ">" at the beginning. The way
>> you posted them, I would have to copy from your mail into a word
>> processor, take all thes
Hello Neal,
Tuesday, October 16, 2007, 5:08:56 PM, among other things, you wrote:
>> If you go into the Sorting Office (Shft+Ctrl+S) and Right Click on the
>> Selective Download title and then choose New Filter, you will find that at
>> the bottom of the right hand panel is an item 'Loa
Hello Tom,
Monday, March 26, 2007, 1:55:38 PM, among other things, I wrote:
R> I will set up some similar filters here and see what happens and report
R> back.
I initially set up three filters in the following order:
1. Time of creation 00.00 to 07.59
2. Time of creation 08.00
Hello Tom,
Monday, March 26, 2007, 1:55:38 PM, among other things, you wrote:
>> Are you quite sure the filters don't overlap? For example, one ending at
>> 08.00 and another starting at 08.00. Just a thought :-)
T> While I have indeed the filters overlapping on these, this would only
T>
Hello Tom,
Sunday, March 25, 2007, 8:02:19 AM, among other things, you wrote:
T> Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:52:05 PM, you wrote:
>> Saturday, March 24, 2007, 7:47:50 PM, you wrote:
for statistical purposes I would like to filter incoming mails of a
specific account by the time they
Hello Ian,
Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 6:44:39 AM, among other things, you wrote:
IAW> Basically what I want to be able to do is to have a filter that checks
IAW> to see if an incoming address is from an address group (any one). If
IAW> it is, then I want the filter to automatically move it to
Hello,
Friday, February 9, 2007, 1:00:00 PM, you wrote:
> As Roelof said - check out the order of the filters in the Sorting
> Office again. :-) Make sure that the "Known" filter (if you have it)
> comes *after* the other filters you created.
> Try to move one of the filters that should sort me
Hello Roelof,
Thursday, February 8, 2007, 10:27:26 AM, you wrote:
> 1) Check whether your filters are active (on the options tab), that is
> the default, so that shouldn't be the cause.
> 2) Check whether the message is processed by another filter, filters
> are checked top down and a message pr
>> Oy - How odd -- All of a sudden a filter has decided to forget its
>> hot key trigger and every time I need to use this filter I have to
>> first open the sorting office and edit the filter to again remember
>> this key combination as the execute trigger!
CW> Odd. Has a newly installed applicat
Hello Thomas,
Monday, August 7, 2006, 7:53:29 AM, you wrote:
> Roelof Otten wrote:
TF>>> One more thing I want to achieve: Mark the original message as read
TF>>> (but not the copy). I haven't an idea yet how to achieve that.
RO>> I haven't tested that, but what about first copying it and mark i
Please
I receive so many e-mail, stop your answer.
Best regards
Ariane
> Hello Roelof,
> On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:46:14 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 20:46 +0700 GMT),
> Roelof Otten wrote:
TF>>> If I move (instead of copy) to folders in account X, how do I copy
TF>>> back to account A/B/C?
RO>> With
MM>>> The regex is correct, tested, confirmed, works like most
MM>>> skilled...
Oh. :( Now I see that the regex is NOT working.
I did do tests and it worked then BUT real life (non-test) messages
are getting thru.
Below I have copied the filter (with a couple of security edits) as
TB! sees
How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1)
containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
header 2) AND MISSING the correct "real name" is to be deleted.
MM>>> This regular expression...
MM>>> (?
--- 8< --- snip, snip --- [edited for brevity]
MM> The regex is correct
>> NOW I just need to know :
>> How do I to tell the selective download filters that any email 1)
>> containing [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the
>> header 2) AND MISSING the correct "real name" is to be deleted.
MM> This regular expression...
MM> (?
MM> .should detect the said address that is not pre
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:12:49 +0100, rich gregory
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I get hundreds of bogus aliases daily that are all spam. Occasionally
the alias is correct, then it is an order.
Here is the example:
Good: Correct_name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bad : Bogus random name or blank
<[EMA
RG>> I would think that if I need 2 filters I would take *ALL* mail
RG>> addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and FIRST send it to the spam
RG>> bucket THEN filter the spam folder for "correct_name
RG>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" and return these to the pending orders
RG>> folder.
RO> This account of yours, i
DAC> On Tuesday, January 24, 2006, 8:51:37 PM, rich gregory wrote:
>> Well, I'd prefer not to leave spam in the inbox.
DAC> I assumed you were going to delete it.
After I sent that mssg I wanted to take it back. I thought my
statement above might come off as rude. Sorry. I have some other
replie
>> I would think that if I need 2 filters I would take *ALL* mail
>> addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and FIRST send it to the spam
>> bucket THEN filter the spam folder for "correct_name
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" and return these to the pending orders
>> folder.
DAC> you lost me there. filter the mai
>> It's still 2 filters then: 1 to get the junk to the junk and the other
>> to put the good ones back.
ASK> Of course. The spam filter is usually the last filter in the list of
ASK> filters, so that it has the lowest priority. First you sort out the good
ASK> ones, then the spam filter takes care
>> I was *hoping* for a "magic bullet" filter. As _ALL_ the spam
>> emails DO NOT have 'real_name' in the TO: field. It *sounds* like an
>> easy filter for someone who hows where/what to click to get the
>> desired results. (Just that's not me!)
DAC> why not filter everything with the RIGHT NAME
Hello Marck,
Monday, January 16, 2006, 7:13:06 AM, you wrote:
RD>> How do many of you keep track of threads where you have replied and
RD>> would be looking for another person to reply to you?
> I use an "About me" colour group to colour red all threads I'm
> involved in.
Marck, can you elabora
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:03:38 +1100 GMT, Chris wrote:
>>> Can someone tell me where to find the filter log (re-filter mail, log
>>> option checked) in v3.64.01?
>> I guess that the log messages will end up in the log "drop-down" at
>> the bottom of the The Bat! main window.
> Hm, just looked the
> Hallo Marten,
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:20:36 +0100GMT (27-10-2005, 13:20 +0200, where
> I live), you wrote:
MG>> and a command window pops up, then my text editor opens the message. I
alter the subject
MG>> line and press SAVE.
MG>> Then what's supposed to happen?
> Then you close the text e
Hello MAU,
Thursday, May 19, 2005, 6:54:31 PM, you wrote:
>> I have copied and pasted this filter onto three of my accounts and
>> attached the same hotkey to all of the three accounts.
>>
>> And here comes the tricky part, sometimes the hotkey for the filter
>> on the first account (onl
On Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 9:22:08 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Munango-Keewati,
> Tuesday, December 14, 2004, 9:10:31 PM, you wrote:
MK>> Any suggestions on how to make this work?
> Do you have this in the Sorting Office under outgoing mail as well as
> Incoming Mail. Actually, you don't have to
Chris and Stuart,
On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 6:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ>> ...it looks like a little hand to me. Can anyone tell me what it
PJ>> signifies, and whether it might be the problem with the filter?
CW>... signifies that the filter is set for 'manual re-filtering
CW> only'
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, December 2, 2004, 2:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PJ>> But I noticed a symbol beside the K9 filter in the tree view of the
PJ>> sorting office:
PJ>> http://www.tangleworld.com/screenshot2.jpg
...
PM> I'd describe it as a hand too, indeed. I don't see this here on Win2K,
P
Hello Luc,
Monday, November 22, 2004, 7:21:49 PM, you wrote:
L> But i get a a feeling that in the first scenario a solution isn't
L> possible (except maybe with regex but i'm not an expert on it)
This is The Bat! There is always a way :)
Try this:
Header Field To: is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If ther
Hello Stuart,
On Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 11:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SC> Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 10:41:36 AM, you wrote:
PJ>> How do I create a filter that sends messages to a common folder
PJ>> Unread? They already go to the folder without a filter but are marked
PJ>> Read.
S
Hi Terry,
On Wednesday, September 22, 2004, 11:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> They already go to the folder without a filter but are marked Read.
TGM> What is the setting in Account > properties > options > mark messages
TGM> as read when being read for? Is this set to 0?
No, it is set to 15
Hi Chris,
C> The account log has some information about what is filtered and where
C> it is put. Look at that combo-box at the bottom of your screen for the
C> latest message. Or, under the Account menu, select View Log to see the
C> full log.
This is ok, but could be better IMO. I was not findin
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Allie posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
in response to my question re: filter action not working :
>> I think this also applies to flagging & moving so I'm of the
>> opinion that it's a problem of 2nd level actions all around.
AM> To me, the problem is with the matching. If you
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Allie posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to filter action not working :
AM> So it would seem to be that there's a problem with filters being
AM> applied when the automatically when the matching criterion is based on
AM> colour group.
Ah! Thank you. Finally someone agr
Hello Allie,
Sunday, July 18, 2004, 8:15:38 PM, you wrote:
AM> I can't get it to work which makes me wonder that our experiences
AM> being the same adds to there being a bug. This shouldn't be a TB!
AM> limitation. TB! can be set to apply filters to messages which have
AM> been assigned a particul
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004, Roelof posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to filter action not working :
JR>> Now have it set to flag msg as action. So far no luck. I'm
JR>> thinking TB! doesn't respond to 2nd level action. What
JR>> do you
JR>> think?
RO> Sometimes I had bad luck with filters tha
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Roelof posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to filter action not working :
JR>> I have tried unsuccessfully to get to TB! to take an
JR>> action > tried 3: flag, delete or move> on msgs that has been
JR>> assigned to a
JR>> color group.
JR>> Is this not possible to do?
RO>
On Sat, 17 Jul 2004, Mica posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to filter action not working :
MM> If I understand well, you expect that TB deletes messages from
MM> server If is not, then is word about "reader
MM> limitation". (:
Thanks for your reply. Still reviewing your extensive filter
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Roelof posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to Filter to delete all msgs assigned to color group not
working :
RO> were you just afraid that you might have overlooked
RO> something?
yes
RO> When you'rew doubting a 'delete' filter, you can always set it
RO> up as a 'mov
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Roelof posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
regards to Filter to delete all msgs assigned to color group not
working :
JR>> The idea is that certain msgs > filter> are set to a certain color code. With this filter
JR>> these
JR>> msgs are to be deleted.
RO> You're mentioning that y
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, May 26, 2004, 5:53:25 PM, you wrote:
RO> I don't know the site you saw these filters, but TB allows you to copy
RO> and paste filters from the sorting office to a text editor and back.
RO> Go to the sorting office
RO> Select a filter
RO> Press Ctrl-C (don't use the 'copy
Hi Jonathan,
Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 9:27:20 PM, you wrote:
JA> msg-id :) Or more specifically In-Reply-To field. It contains your
JA> domain, you could filter on that. For example:
JA> [EMAIL PROTECTED]recipient yes
JA> In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kludgesyes
JA> Regular Epxres
Saturday, February 28, 2004, 8:37:10 AM, Greg wrote:
AJ>> I have one account which receives virtually nothing but spam - it's the
AJ>> account I use on websites when I have to.
GS> You might want to try some Java script for you email for protection.
I actually meant I enter that one at other peo
T> ... what appears to be plain text is actually interspersed with bogus html
T> tags. So "banned" is actually "banned".
T> The [TB!] filter doesn't ignore these html tags. And since the tags are
T> randomly placed and can be made up of anything, it's near to impossible to
T> write a filter specif
>> MainSet: 40gov
M> Should be '30gov'. That is, Location should be Text and not Kludges.
(I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT (not kludges) FIRST!
(I am pretty sure) I had it set to TEXT (not kludges) then, once it failed to
work as expected, I think I set the gov string to KLUDGES from TEXT
Marck,
>> Is there any reason why TB! would not automatically filter a
>> message (when "Manual only" is not ticked in the filter rule) but
>> will do so when asked to Re-filter Messages (Folder>right click)?
M> Sometimes rules used to get corrupted. I would often have to
M> re-create a rule from
Hi Adam
Tuesday, October 14, 2003, 5:27:44 PM, you wrote:
V>> I did look at that but it didn't show any filter activity. Hmmm..looks like the
V>> filters aren't responsible at all then. I guess I'll figure it out. Thanks.
A> Filter processing should appear there, if you scroll to the right. It
A
Hi MAU
Monday, October 13, 2003, 5:14:49 PM, you wrote:
M> Account/View log, or Sift+Ctrl+A
I did look at that but it didn't show any filter activity. Hmmm..looks like the
filters aren't responsible at all then. I guess I'll figure it out. Thanks.
Cheers,
--
Vishal
RO> I'm using this batch file and nothing got frozen:
RO> c:\windows\command\edit c:\edit.txt
RO> "c:\Program Files\The Bat!\thebat.exe" /importu=roelof;F=Inbox;X;R;IN=c:\edit.txt
RO> I exported the message (as unix mailbox) to the
RO> file c:\edit.txt, the account I was using is called roelof.
RO>
RA> (Actually, I am a he, not a she)
Sorry about the gender faux pas! I know only 1 Robin who happens to be female. Sorry
again
>> I am sure it would work if the batch file did not run the second line
>> (import) until after the first command was completed (by me saving the
>> edited emai
9/14/2003, 3:14 PM: MAU said in "Filter for Outbox move to other outbox for MyGate"
M> Hello Wilfried,
>> I use MyGate for News. Works as a glance. But however if I wants to forward a
>> message to a normal email account the thing cannot sent. Can I setup a rule
>> that in that case t is
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, at 09:39:05 [GMT +0200] (which was 08:39 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
PP> Maybe, only maybe, I'll rewrite the whole stuff one day; chances are I
PP> have a little more spare time starting with September. But I guarantee
PP> for nothing; neither the program nor the
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 4:43:11 PM, you wrote:
TF> I am not sure, but I think you need to name it "$Known$" (without
TF> quotes).
It is not the solution :( Sad, but true.
Anyway thanks.
--
Best regards,
Artemichmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Hello Wolffe,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 10:55:22 PM, you wrote:
W> when I zapped mine, I cheated to get it back .. I created a new
W> (dummy) account then copy and pasted the from there to the
W> old account. Then deleted the dummy account.
Yes, it works! Thanks a lot.
I did it other way tho
Hello Jonathan,
> Well this is a start. What I have a feeling is you're adding filter
> strings to the alternatives, so that you only have 1 "Set" in the
> "alternative" rules, instead of multiple "sets". This results in the
> following effect:
> [Filter 1] OR [Filter 2 AND Filter 3 AND Filte
Hello Miguel,
>> I puted an expression
>> stings location : presence :
>> vivivi kludges no
> All your messages match this rule because none of them include
> "vivivi" in the headers (kludges)
Ok, I understand :-)
> I have a similar filter and I use:
> strings locatio
Hello Jonathan,
>> Therefore I'm obliged to put at least one string in the "rule" ?
> Not really no, but it depends what you want the filter to do.
yes an antispam filter !
>>> Try putting something in the first page ("Rules"),
>> I try
>> I puted an expression
>> stings location :
Hello Jonathan,
>> I tried to apply an antispam method by applying a filtering with
>> "alternatives" on keywords. The problem is that TB sends to the
>> folder "antispam " created for that purpose, all the mails, same those
>> who don't contain the strings, with no exception... In fact, it
>> se
Hello Leif,
Saturday, October 5, 2002, 8:19:49 PM, you wrote:
LG> The only issue is trying to keep the messages in the same
LG> folder. I still haven't figured out why there isn't a
LG> checkbox to disable the Move Message to Folder option. \
ok, I give up, how do you get a "global for accoun
On Monday, October 7, 2002, 12:50:52 PM, Thomas F. wrote:
LG>> First create a Color Group by clicking Options -> Message List and
LG>> Color Groups. Make sure you check the Strikethrough option.
TF> I do not have that option. Under Fonts I have Italics, Bold, and
TF> Bold+Italic. No Strikeout. O
Hello Januk,
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 10:40:45 PM, you wrote:
JA> Hello Peter,
JA> On Wednesday, July 17, 2002 at 19:34 GMT -0400, Peter Kerekes [PK]
JA> pressed random keys until the following was produced:
PK>> With right click on mouse the window offer all kinds of things,
PK>> but not pas
El miércoles 17 de julio de 2002, 3.25, Peter Palmreuther decía:
PP> If you don't already have a regular expression applied to your quotes
PP> macro use this as a starting point:
PP> %SETPATTREGEXP='(?is)(^-+ eGroups.*~-~>.*-*_->$\s+){0,1}%-
PP> (^-BEGIN PGP SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?%-
P
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 2:25:19 AM, you wrote:
PP> Hello Ricardo,
PP> On Wednesday, July 17, 2002 at 2:31:48 AM you [RMR] wrote (at least in
PP> part):
RMR>> I would like to cut the signatures (everything below the '-- ')
RMR>> before writing the archive, just like the %QUOTES m
Sunday, July 14, 2002, 2:49:42 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
TF> This is absolutely correct. Sorry, I didn't point it out. You need to
TF> copy the file account.srx from the account with the filters to the
TF> account where you want the filters to be copied to. It is a good idea
TF> to back up (rename)
Hi Lynn,
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:36:30 -0700, you wrote:
> I found it, but it's only 1k ... I have a *lot* of filters
> .. would this be it? or .. wait .. in the account folder
> there's one that's 44k .. sounds more likely ..?
It is more likely to be the one in the account folder as each account
Saturday, July 13, 2002, 10:09:24 PM, you wrote:
JA> Hi Thomas,
JA> On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 11:38:56 +0700, you wrote:
>> ..for example copying the account.srx file over. ;-)
JA> Wouldn't know what the file was... but I'm sure you're probably right... I would
JA> peek, but work is a little far aw
Hi Lynn,
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002 09:17:43 -0700, you wrote:
> I'm not doing them all, but there are a few obvious
> troublemakers ..
Most or .kr and those kind of areas? ;)
> JA> Selective Downloads filter allows you to read a text file if I remember
> JA> correctly. I've seen some people utilisin
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 8:40:00 PM, you wrote:
JA> Hi Lynn,
JA> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 06:52:49 -0700, you wrote:
>> In my quest for spam reduction options, I've decided to
>> filter on the ip's of spam mails which apparently have
>> forged 'from' addresses. If I make a list of these and use
>>
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 7:30:04 AM, you wrote:
MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP> Hash: SHA1
MDP> Hi Lynn,
MDP> @11 July 2002, 06:52 -0700 (14:52 UK time) Lynn Turriff [LT] in
MDP> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
LT>> If I make a list of these and use the 'add' but
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 6:59:10 AM, you wrote:
G> Hi Lynn,
G> Copy everything between beginfilter & endfilter
G> Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V
G> You have now copied a filter.
G> String1a&string2a are AND functions
G> String2b&string2b are AND functions
G> String
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 12:18:00 PM, you wrote:
TF> Hello Robert,
TF> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:25:02 -0400 GMT (12/07/02, 01:25 +0700 GMT),
TF> Robert D. wrote:
>>> Copy everything between beginfilter & endfilter
>>> Go to sorting office incoming mail filter and press Ctr-V
RD>> I like this
El domingo 2 de junio de 2002, 15.02, RapidFX decía:
R> Hello...
R> Yes.
R> Sunday, June 2, 2002, 7:26:20 AM, you wrote:
A>> Could I dictate that filters will only filter Inbox mail? Other
A>> (IMAP) mailboxes seem parsed.
how is your "conversation course" going on?
--
Ricardo M. Reyes | [E
Hello Roelof!
It finally works. I combined your tips with the help of Gerard
and ...filtering is perfect now. I made a filter for outgoing
mail too, 'll see if it works as well.
Read you,
Fré.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions & mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Hello Gerard!
On Tuesday 30-04-02 (15:37) you wrote:
G> - Put it on top of you incoming mail sort list - Check if it
G> is looking in the "Kludges" - Check presence is YES - Check
G> Active Marked - check Manual only Un-Marked
--
In the meantime I had added a second filter (i.e. f
Hallo Roelof,
Op dinsdag 30-04-02 (12:06) schreef je me:
RO> I'll give you my filter.
RO> There are a few things important for the filter, those are:
RO> Source: Your Inbox
RO> Target: Your tbudl folder
RO> String: Reply-To: tbudl
RO> Location: Kludges
RO> Presence: Yes
RO> Active: Must be
This is a forwarded message
From: Fré van Limpt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, April 29, 2002, 7:37:41 PM
Subject: Filter strings
===8<==Original message text===
Hello Roelof,
>I have just given up 'kludges' as location, I'll see
Hello Roelof,
Op Saturday 27-04-02 (22:54) you wrote:
RO> Do these messages trigger another filter first? Unless it's
RO> specifically checked, the first matching filter stops
RO> comparing messages to the other filters. (See options in
RO> the filter properties)
--
I had started
Hello David!
On Saturday 27-04-02 (23:03) you wrote:
DE> May be the message is being caught by another filter first ?
--
I typed the wrong item in the 'location' box and will see
what's going to happen with 'kludges' instead ...
Read you,
Fré.
Visit
Hello David!
On Saturday 27-04-02 (21:25) you wrote:
DE> this is a cut of my filter. It works for me.
--
(SOT) My blood must be of bad quality (i ate garlic): bat still
doesn't fly the right direction...
You'll hear from me.
Visit www.skripton.com
Reactions & mailto:[EMAIL PR
Bonjour,
Thu, 25 Apr 2002 21:35:22 +0530, Raj wrote:
R> Philippe,
R> On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, at 13:41:07 [GMT +0200] (which was 5:11 PM where I live) you
R> wrote:
PG>> The fact is that the message corresponding has been downloaded, ...
PG>> and filtered correctly. Where is the problem ?
Hello,
Tuesday, February 26, 2002, 1:12:22 AM, you wrote:
JS> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JS> Hello Peter,
JS> On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, at 20:15:51 [GMT -0500] (which was 8:15:51
JS> PM in NY, USA) Peter Kerekes wrote:
Peter Kerekes>> Actually it would be even better, if possible , to use
Shahar,
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, at 07:19:54 [GMT +0200] (which was 10:49 AM where I live) you
wrote:
S> I found a working solution, all in one filter and I tested it with
S> about 200 messages from 10 different email addresses and it's smooth.
Can you enlighten us on the logic ???
--
Warm regard
Same problem ...
Sender, reply to and To all have the same format!
>> For example, I get mail from a mailing list where the sender may be
>> one of
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> etc
>> There is no guarantee as to what node it will come from or whether
>> they
Hello Jan,
Wednesday, February 20, 2002, 8:04:18 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Stuart.
> At 7:52 PM on Wednesday, February 20, 2002 you wrote
> the following about Filter question:
Stuart>> What I really would like to be able to do is say
Stuart>> sender: list xyz.com
Stuart>> Is there any way to do
Gerard,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, at 14:03:16 [GMT +0100] (which was 6:33 PM where I live) you
wrote:
GdV> Thanks for thinking with me.
,- [GdV ]
| Conclusion: everything was working brilliantly but I was looking in the
|wrong place. Thanks anyhow, I am going to stop working for today
|:
Gerard,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, at 13:28:40 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:58 PM where I live) you
wrote:
GdV> It just forwards the email, with no added text.
Have a look into your outbox for the message which has been forwarded. Does
the layout of message look as if it has been created by some othe
Roelof,
On Sat, 5 Jan 2002, at 12:40:22 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:10 PM where I live) you
wrote:
RO> When I check two Address Book Groups messages are only triggered by
RO> Address Book entries that occur in both groups.
Is there a way then to trigger a filter if the message is in either an
Rick,
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, at 20:13:12 [GMT -0600] (which was 7:43 AM where I live) you
wrote:
RS> I do not know how to paste a filter. Please tell me how.
Select the filter and use the standard Ctrl+C and then paste the same in the
message by Ctrl+V
Or use the right click after selec
David,
Your right, it works. You can copy and paste the filters.
It's just that I never so anyone post a filter.
Thanks for the insight/
Best regards,
Gerard
Finagle's fourth Law - Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it only makes
it worse.
Tuesday, November 13, 2001, 10:51:1
Ah man, the grammar in my first post was atrocious. :/
I did setup the location to be kludges, and even tried the everywhere
option, but, alas, no luck.
I just did a simple test and moved a kludge of 'Subject: Test' to the
trash bin. Worked fine. If i change this to 'Content-Type:
application/
Hello Aljoscha,
Saturday, September 29, 2001, 2:28:04 PM, you wrote:
AR> I use this list under Options -> Preferences -> Warnings
AR>
*.AD,*.ADP,*.ASP,*.BAS,*.BAT,*.COM,*.CMD,*.CHM,*.CPL,*.CRT,*.DLL,*.EXE,*.HLP,*.HTA,*.INF,*.INS,*.ISP,*.JAR,*.JS,*.JSE,*.LNK,*.MDB,*.MDE,*.MSC,*.MSI,*.MSP,*.MST,
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 2:21:07 PM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
TF> Hello Miles,
TF> On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 14:21:13 -0400 GMT (24/09/2001, 02:21 +0800 GMT),
TF> Miles Alexander wrote:
MA>> I will add this to my collection of quotes!
TF> Cool.
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 12:17:37 PM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
TF> Hello Miles,
TF> On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 11:07:39 -0400 GMT (23/09/2001, 23:07 +0800 GMT),
TF> Miles Alexander wrote:
"Drugs may lead to nowhere, but at least it's the scenic ro
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 12:23:21 PM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
TF> No, this won't work. The Selective Download Filter downloads all
TF> message headers and then processes only these. The signal string must
TF> be matched exactly *in the head
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 10:42:19 AM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
Selective downloads:
Yes: this seems to be a very good way to resolve the situation but do
I need to imply (within the window) the following format?:
String: [Person One], Loca
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 10:42:19 AM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
Thomas,
So, what you are telling me is that the Incoming filters are processed
in a hierarchy and putting my *else* filter at the bottom of that list
(thus the Move Up and Move D
Hello Thomas,
Historians believe that Sunday, September 23, 2001, 1:58:21 AM, was when,
Thomas typed the following:
TF> Hello Miles,
TF> On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:27:27 -0400 GMT (23/09/2001, 10:27 +0800 GMT),
TF> Miles Alexander wrote:
MA>> If an incoming transaction does not match *any*
On Monday, July 30, 2001,
CaLViN wrote,
> If this is what you are looking for you may want to try the current
> beta or wait for the next version...
Yes, It's what I want, but a prefer wait the stable version.
Thanks.
--
Luca Minuti
Using The Bat! v1.53d
--
On Friday, June 08, 2001, 00:03:22, A Curtis Martin wrote:
> Are you aware that the filter action to delete the message from the server
> isn't immediately executed and is actually carried out during the next
> mail check?
I wasn't, but re-checking my mail didn't change anything.
I habe TB check
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk,
On Saturday, May 19, 2001 19:02:40 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Filter problem':
>> [...] The common denominator is your sender name
>> which is why I've filtered on that rather than worrying about
>> where
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
