looks quite useful to me.
It allows you to easily see whether there is a problem with
the pop server or the smtp server.
--
Regards,
Wolfgang
Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists
writing without the moderator's hat on ;-)
Using The Bat! 1.49 under Windows 95 4.0 Build B
in Sta
ot;Connecting to POP Server". After this has been successful,
> the amil is then sent via the SMTP server. This is as it has always
> been. One window.
> But here is the second window popping up, entitled: "Receiving Mail".
> Oops, did I check Combined Delivery? No, unc
Hi Dierk,
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:05:22 +0100GMT (16/02/2001, 16:05 +0800GMT),
Dierk Haasis wrote:
>> We have a found a buglet: When "POP before SMTP" is tickmarked, TB
>> will always do "Combined Delivery", regardless of whether "Combined
>> Delivery&q
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Friday, February 16, 2001 at 3:23:55 AM you wrote:
> We have a found a buglet: When "POP before SMTP" is tickmarked, TB
> will always do "Combined Delivery", regardless of whether "Combined
&
Hi Deniz,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:14:26 +0200GMT (15/02/2001, 00:14 +0800GMT),
Deniz Baygan wrote:
DB> I need it.
DB> But new scheme is bad.
DB> up to 1.47, only one window used to open, log in pop3, then
DB> disconnect, then connect smtp and send mail..
DB> New scheme (sinc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Dierk,
Wednesday, February 14, 2001, 6:54:07 PM, you wrote:
> Perfectly right, but why do you use *both* SMTP after POP and SMTP
> authentication?
I'm not using both of them.
I'm using "Pop before smtp" system.
nly one window used to open, log in pop3, then
> disconnect, then connect smtp and send mail..
> New scheme (since 1.48) opens 2 windows first logs pop3 and other logs smtp.
> 1 window is better than 2 ;-)
Perfectly right, but why do you use *both* SMTP after POP and SMTP
authentication?
A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Thomas,
Wednesday, February 14, 2001, 6:17:55 PM, you wrote:
> I don't understand this sentence. The option was introduced because
> some SMTP servers require it. But you don't need to enable it if you
> don't need
Hallo Deniz,
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:42:55 +0200 GMT (14/02/2001, 23:42 +0800 GMT),
Deniz Baygan wrote:
I'll leave the PGP question to the PGP experts.
DB> BTW, I disliked series since 1.47 because of new "pop before smtp" auth system.
I don't understand this s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi David,
On 13 January 2001 at 11:40:17 +0100 (which was 10:40 where I
live) David Buntenbroich wrote and made these points:
DB> By the way, I started a new thread since the old one was made a Dead
DB> Horse by one of the moderators. (And your ques
Hi,
Saturday, January 13, 2001, 11:40:17 AM, I wrote:
> You might want to create a filter to move sent messages back to the
> first account's outbox.
**
Of course, I meant the sent folder.
--
Regards,
David
David Buntenbroich
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hello Shahar,
Saturday, January 13, 2001, 11:13:58 AM, you wrote:
> Can I set an SMTP settings to a folder within an account so I can
> force the messages to be sent from that specific folder through a
> specific SMTP server ?
I think, the only thing you can do is to create a dummy ac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jannik,
On 10 January 2001 at 11:15:10 +0100 (which was 10:15 where I
live) Jannik Lindquist wrote and made these points:
JL> IMAP: operamail.com
JL> SMTP: operamail.com
JL> I haven't tested it with POP, but I think a good gu
Hello TBUDL,
Just for the record: I just found out that Operamail works very neatly
with TB (IMAP, SMTP by login). Perhaps I am the only one that didn't
know - but, apparently, there is no information on this, whatsoever,
in Operamail's own help-file.
The settings are:
IMAP: ope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello J and everyone else...
JA> That's not true anymore. The %From Macro doesn't need to be doubled
JA> up. The same thing applies to the %Reply-To macro and one
JA> other that I can't remember. This was changed not too long ago
JA> (version 1.4
On Tuesday, September 19, 2000, 9:33:42 AM, you wrote:
JT> ...then you can use this macro: %from="" %from="Xtrader
JT> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
Thanks much - didn't realize one could do that...
ztrader
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at htt
Hello Jason,
On Tuesday, September 19, 2000 at 09:33:42 GMT -0700 (which was 9:33 AM
where I live) witnesses say Jason Thompson typed:
> ...then you can use this macro:
> %from="" %from="Xtrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> ...to change the "From" to that. Note the preceeding %from="". If you
> d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello ztrader and everyone else...
z> Do these change the user name, or just get the user name from
z> properties? How could they change the name?
%from will actually change the "From" header. If your "From"
information is usually:
ztrader <[EMAIL
On Monday, September 18, 2000, 11:20:39 PM, you wrote:
TF> Of course: 1.) Go to the send box, selexct your message and take a
TF> look at the headers (shft-ctrl-K). 2.) Go to the log and see what
TF> had been sent
This found the problem. I had generated a message, placed it in the
outbox, could
st get the user name from
z> properties? How could they change the name?
%From will change the "From" name, %ReplyTo" will change the reply-to
name, and so on. Maybe your SMTP server checks this; it's likely if
they want to prevent spam.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message r
Hi ztrader,
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 23:04:35 -0700GMT (19/09/2000, 14:04 +0800GMT),
ztrader wrote:
z> This is a change in the account - it used to work OK. They made some
z> kind of change, but say it should work with lower case user names. Is
z> there a way to check what I actually send to them to
On Monday, September 18, 2000, 9:25:16 PM, you wrote:
JT> In addition to what Syafril said, you might also want to check for
JT> any %from macros in your templates, and folder-level identities.
Do these change the user name, or just get the user name from
properties? How could they change the na
On Monday, September 18, 2000, 8:29:59 PM, you wrote:
SH> Perhaps you are using SMTP Authentication or POP before SMTP feature,
Those are not used.
This is a change in the account - it used to work OK. They made some
kind of change, but say it should work with lower case user names.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello ztrader and everyone else...
z> Question: How can I be sure TB is not sending out an SMTP request with
z> U? Did I not find all the places where it needs to be changed? Is
z> it stored in the registry, perhaps? Any ideas to check
at says:
z> [EMAIL PROTECTED] no such user. The error message still has the name
z> with a leading Ucase letter. I can receive mail, so there is such an
z> account.
z> Question: How can I be sure TB is not sending out an SMTP request with
z> U? Did I not find all the places where
out an SMTP request with
U? Did I not find all the places where it needs to be changed? Is
it stored in the registry, perhaps? Any ideas to check this out to see
if the problem is at my end or theirs?
Thanks,
ztrader
--
--
View the
Hello Tom Plunket,
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 10:33:25 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, September 01, 2000, 12:33:25 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tom Plunket wrote:
VM>>> Try send thru my university SMTP use this: pop.faesa.br maybe work.
VM>>> Was wro
ipient ok
>>> DATA
<<< 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
>>> (message body)
<<< 250 NAA11623 Message accepted for delivery
>>> QUIT
<<< 221 sr01.faesa.br closing connection
rlytest.pl: relay accepted - final response code
Olá Marck,
quinta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2000, você escreveu:
MDP> On 31 August 2000 at 13:16:18 GMT -0300 (which was 17:16 where I
MDP> live) Viktor Mota wrote and made these points on the subject
MDP> of "Subj: Sending mail without SMTP server.":
Rac>>> My offic
VM>> Try send thru my university SMTP use this: pop.faesa.br maybe work.
VM>> Was wrong on last mail!!! now it is
VM>> correct
MDP> This looks like the address of a POP server rather than an SMTP
MDP> server.
Last I heard, many em
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Viktor,
On 31 August 2000 at 13:16:18 GMT -0300 (which was 17:16 where I
live) Viktor Mota wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Subj: Sending mail without SMTP server.":
Rac>> My office network has no SMTP server, and
Hi Rrhankins,
On Thursday 31/08/2000 at 16:40, you wrote:
> My office network has no SMTP server, and my ISP will not allow me to
> remotely send mail through their SMTP server. I thought The Bat would allow
> me to send mail by acting as a SMTP server (or using a remote serve
Olá Rrhankins,
quinta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2000, você escreveu:
Rac> My office network has no SMTP server, and my ISP will not allow me to
Rac> remotely send mail through their SMTP server. I thought The Bat would allow
Rac> me to send mail by acting as a SMTP server (or using
Olá Rrhankins,
quinta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2000, você escreveu:
Rac> My office network has no SMTP server, and my ISP will not allow me to
Rac> remotely send mail through their SMTP server. I thought The Bat would allow
Rac> me to send mail by acting as a SMTP server (or using
My office network has no SMTP server, and my ISP will not allow me to
remotely send mail through their SMTP server. I thought The Bat would allow
me to send mail by acting as a SMTP server (or using a remote server?). Can
someone help me with this
Hi John,
> A few months ago I had problems with my ISP's SMTP server, it kept
> refusing to send messages, throwing back the error: "Syntactically
> invalid HELO argument(s)". At the time I managed to solve the
> problem, which is normally to do with network settings.
Hi
This query may bore you all to death, but it mystifies me, so here
goes:
A few months ago I had problems with my ISP's SMTP server, it kept
refusing to send messages, throwing back the error: "Syntactically
invalid HELO argument(s)". At the time I managed to solve the pr
Hi Katsmeow,
> You have it correct...but for the fact that I am a *she* not a
> *he.*
Ooops, sorry. It's funny that I was misidentified as "she" not too
long ago, and now this. Now I'll remember.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
Using The Bat! 1.45 S/MIME under Win2k
--
--
Hi Ming-Li,
Friday, July 28, 2000, 9:38:33 AM, you wrote:
> While Katsmeow can recreate all the necessary folders in account 2
> before copying the .srx file, it's still not exactly desirable, for,
> if I understand him correctly, he wants all mail filtered into
> folders under the main account
Hi Marck,
> It is account.srx but there is an order of execution issue with
> it:
>> Exit TB then copy the ACCOUNT.SRX file from the root folder of your
>> main mail account to the folder for the account you wish to have the
>> same filters. When you reload TB the secondary account will have th
t* all
mail to your main account. Then check the "Allow Local Delivery"
option in [Options/Network & Administration], which would
essentially "move" the "redirected" mail from the second account to
the main account, without sending out to smtp server and come back
i
Hi Jason,
> My questions: Is there a way to get the Bat! to switch between
> these servers either intelligently or with a drop-down so that I
> don't have to retype the names every time?
The easiest way to accomplish this is to setup different accounts,
each with its own smtp se
Hi Curtis,
On 28 July 2000 at 21:47:38 GMT -0500 (which was 03:47 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "Using twi smtp servers":
K>> BTW, is there a way to copy all of my filters from my main account
K>> to the office account so I
t up now on
> TB! One account is my main account using "my" smtp server (this is
> the account I use at home). I am filtering all mail to this account.
> Second account is a secondary account I have with another e-mail
> address that I use for public postings. Third accou
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 21:08:23 -0500, Katsmeow wrote:
K> No, it isn't that. I have no problem downloading mail whether at my
K> office or at home. THe thing is that I have 3 accounts set up now on
K> TB! One account is my main account using "my" smtp server (this is
K>
No, it isn't that. I have no problem downloading mail whether at my
office or at home. THe thing is that I have 3 accounts set up now on
TB! One account is my main account using "my" smtp server (this is
the account I use at home). I am filtering all mail to this account.
Se
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 18:55:43 -0500, Katsmeow wrote:
K> Thanks. This was very clear and very helpful. Works well.
K> Oops, I spoke too soon.
K> I set up the second account for my office smtp. Fine. But I am home
K> now and that account is collecting my mail. I don't w
nt for my office smtp. Fine. But I am home
now and that account is collecting my mail. I don't want this second
account to collect my mail. I want my "main" account to collect the
mail. How do I handle that? Do I just not put in the pop server in
the account properties or wha
Hi Curtis,
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 3:18:13 PM, you wrote:
> This is the scenario. You wish to send a reply to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] but using your account 'foobar'
Thanks. This was very clear and very helpful. Works well.
--
Best regards,
Katsmeow mailto:[EMAIL PRO
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 14:34:53 -0500, Katsmeow wrote:
>> Again templates using the %ACCOUNT="" macro. Or you may
>> select the account on a per message basis using the Options | Active
>> Account menu option in the editor.
K> I tried to do this. I went to quick templates and tried to set
In Reference to "Using twi smtp servers" From Steve Lamb:
S> Won't work. When I accidentally write a message in my work account that I
S> meant to send from my home account I, at one time, tried to just change the
S> active account. Sure, the name changed, the r
On Thu, 27 Jul 2000 11:00:15 -0800, Bailey, Jason wrote:
BJ> In my case it didn't work. I didn't try the above solution. I edited
BJ> opera.ini and switched to Handler=3 from Handler=2 in the mail
BJ> section. Now everything works fine. Thanks to Gerard for the tip.
To complicate thi
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 10:33:54 AM, Thomas wrote:
> Both accounts would be similar, with the only exception being the smtp
> server in acounts/properties/transport.
Won't work. When I accidentally write a message in my work account that I
meant to send from my home account I,
Hi Curtis,
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 11:45:31 AM, you wrote:
> Again templates using the %ACCOUNT="" macro. Or you may select
> the account on a per message basis using the Options | Active Account
> menu option in the editor.
I tried to do this. I went to quick templates and tried to s
Hello TBUDL,
I connect to the internet three different ways with my laptop. 1)At work
I am plugged into a LAN with a dedicated network connection with a DHCP
assigned address. When I am hooked up this way, I use the local SMTP server
(since my ISP won't relay mail from machines not o
te to use that would
K> use a different account? (I need basic info or else need to know
K> where to find the basic info).
Both accounts would be similar, with the only exception being the smtp
server in acounts/properties/transport.
You said that all mails are filtered into folders (which i
Hi Curtis,
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 11:45:31 AM, you wrote:
> Again templates using the %ACCOUNT="" macro
I know how to set up the basic template to send and reply to mail.
But how do I set it up to easily select a template to use that would
use a different account? (I need basic info or else
n - The Bat!" for example and that folder is set up
K> with my netcom smtp server, how do I easily from that folder change
K> the account responding to a particular message?
Again templates using the %ACCOUNT="" macro. Or you may select
the account on a per message ba
Hi Nick,
Thursday, July 27, 2000, 10:51:40 AM, you wrote:
> In Reference to "Using twi smtp servers" From Katsmeow:
K>> Any ideas of ways to handle this where it is easier?
> Two separate accounts with mail filtered into a single one. Changes
> accounts on the f
In Reference to "Using twi smtp servers" From Katsmeow:
K> Any ideas of ways to handle this where it is easier?
Two separate accounts with mail filtered into a single one. Changes
accounts on the fly is a snap with The Bat! You could even make a
quick template to make i
I have a problem I am not sure how to solve to make sending mail as
easy as possible.
Each weekday I use one smtp server at my office and another at home.
At my office I am on a network with a continuous connection and I do
not dial out. My ISP is netcom (now earthlink) who no longer lets you
Hello Thomas,
on 13:38 you wrote:
TS> Connect for sending to the SMTP of your local ISP => but then you
TS> still will have to use 2 setups to send!
TS> Or you use a smal mailserver tool that supports more than on SMTP
TS> servers or is chosing the rigt one for this connectio
mean it or misunderstand it.
t> On the other hand if they block port 25 as you say...
t> Any ideas how to get around that if this is the reason?
t> I cannot really believe this to be the reason as if I send via
t> Myrealbox while on this server things do work..
t> Smtp with passwor
Howdy Tom,
Yup..this can be a real problem..most ISPs ban mail forwarding from
other SMTP addies. The only way around it is to set up different
accounts with the particular SMTP settings for each ISP...that is how I
do it..it is not The Bat's fault. This will happen with any emailer.
rega
t> I cannot send mail via one isp since last week. basically it c annot
t> connect with the smtp server the Bat says.
I'd ask the mail-server provider about it. Some allow outbound SMTP
connections, others don't. They may have allowed it for a while but
now don'
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 07:57:01AM +0700 or thereabouts, tracer wrote:
> Saturday, July 01, 2000
> I use 2 isp's, with my own smtp in the USA.
> It specifies the range of ip's for both isp's and we checked
> settings are still the same as before and correct.
reason?
I cannot really believe this to be the reason as if I send via
Myrealbox while on this server things do work..
Smtp with password though
> If that is the case some ISPs are now taking to blocking outbound port 25
> (SMTP) connections to prevent spammers from being able to spam
it is for security reasons.
If that is the case some ISPs are now taking to blocking outbound port 25
(SMTP) connections to prevent spammers from being able to spam from one of
their IPs directly out to the net. This could be the security measure they
are referring to. Such a measure wo
Saturday, July 01, 2000
Hello Bat-users,
I have since a week a problem with my smtp and while it likely is
not a Bat problem maybe some have an idea.
I use 2 isp's, with my own smtp in the USA.
It specifies the range of ip's for both isp's and we checked
settings are
Hi Patrick,
On Friday, June 09, 2000, 5:30:12 PM, you wrote in part about "SMTP
access":
P> aehem. kidding? kiffing? (german-only-joke)
P> give me a hint how i should combine the existing bat-interface with
P> LISP...
I have not been able to do so (yet :-))
--
hallo gary!
on Friday, June 09, 2000, 11:35:18 PM, you wrote:
g> Patrick Erler writes:
P>> what i would like to do:
P>> accessing the mail-spool-path of my linux-router with the BAT.
P>> explanation:
P>> in the near future i get my mail delivered to my linux-rou
Patrick Erler writes:
P> what i would like to do:
P> accessing the mail-spool-path of my linux-router with the BAT.
P> explanation:
P> in the near future i get my mail delivered to my linux-router via
P> SMTP-forwarding from my provider. instead of polling the linux-router
hallo TBUDL!
what i would like to do:
accessing the mail-spool-path of my linux-router with the BAT.
explanation:
in the near future i get my mail delivered to my linux-router via
SMTP-forwarding from my provider. instead of polling the linux-router
with the BAT every minute i would like to
Hello,
I have the following problem:
Sending mails with the bat! 1.44 under win98 se did not work.
The Compuserve Mail server responds with this message: Temporary
Authentication Failure!
What can I do?
My e-mail client is configured this way:
Send Mail
SMTP Server: smtp.cs.com
Advanced
hallo TBUDL!
are there plans to read mail via monitoring an SMTP-directory in BAT?
(see PMMAIL)
PAT
--
vcard/LDAP/PGP: http://dresden-online.com/~perler/identity.html
PGP fingerprint: DAC6 2FDA 1ED7 AD55 BD1F 5142 3D5F 72BF
quot;.
> A very good method against spammers.
And actually you just have to set TB! to go "POP before SMTP" (sorry
for the sorry pun).
EH>> GMX is down most of the
EH>> time anyway, and they are painfully slow.
> Absolutely not true in my experience.
Just today the ne
Hi,
EH> GMX have that stupid policy that first you have to download mail and
EH> only then they let you upload. The server replies with "Please log in
EH> first".
A very good method against spammers.
EH> It's really annoying but they haven't even bothered to reply to a
EH> respective request of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jast,
Sunday, May 21, 2000, 10:51:53 AM, you wrote:
J> Look Again: Account/Properties/Transport/Button More...
J> There should be a button there.
Found it now !!! Thanx !!
- --
BFN
Gerdmailto:[EMAIL PROTE
Morning Gerd Ewald,
> Sorry, I found no such checkbox in my "advanced transport
> configuration"-tab. Did I do something wrong ?
Look Again: Account/Properties/Transport/Button More...
There should be a button there.
--
.. Jast ... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: using TB 1.42f
: with AMD K6-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dieter,
Saturday, May 20, 2000, 11:30:34 PM, you wrote:
DH> Did you check 'POP before SMTP Authentication' in advanced
transport
DH> configuration?
Sorry, I found no such checkbox in my "advanced transport
conf
Hello Listmembers,
On Sat, 20 May 2000 at 21:41:17 [GMT +0200] Stefan Kuhs wrote:
> I can't send mail with the gmx.net smtp server when using The Bat.
> When using Netscape messenger it works without problems.
Did you check 'POP before SMTP Authentication'
Hello The Bat! users,
Stefan Kuhs wrote on 5/20/2000, 9:41 PM
SK> Hello everybody,
SK> I can't send mail with the gmx.net smtp server when using The Bat.
SK> When using Netscape messenger it works without problems.
SK> SMTP: mail.gmx.net
SK> pop3: pop.gmx.net
SK> I us
Hello Stefan,
Saturday, May 20, 2000, 9:41:17 PM, you wrote:
> I can't send mail with the gmx.net smtp server when using The Bat.
> When using Netscape messenger it works without problems.
GMX have that stupid policy that first you have to download mail and
only then they let you
Hello everybody,
I can't send mail with the gmx.net smtp server when using The Bat.
When using Netscape messenger it works without problems.
SMTP: mail.gmx.net
pop3: pop.gmx.net
I use the gmx member number as login name (at GMX web mail u use your
email address)
Can anybody help?
Than
e. The next time The Bat! says it
CD>> isn't able to connect to the server. I have to restart The Bat!
CD>> every time I need to send a new mail from the Win2K box. From my Win
CD>> 98 machine there are not problems at all using the same ISP.
CD>> I have also trie
e. The next time The Bat! says it
CD>> isn't able to connect to the server. I have to restart The Bat!
CD>> every time I need to send a new mail from the Win2K box. From my Win
CD>> 98 machine there are not problems at all using the same ISP.
CD>> I have also trie
ve to restart The Bat!
CD> every time I need to send a new mail from the Win2K box. From my Win
CD> 98 machine there are not problems at all using the same ISP.
CD> I have also tried a couple of other SMTP servers I have legitimate
CD> access to, but no go.
tell us more about y
98 machine there are not problems at all using the same ISP.
I have also tried a couple of other SMTP servers I have legitimate
access to, but no go.
What might be wrong here?
--
Best regards,
Christian
http://christian.dysthe.tripod.com
ICQ: 3945810
"I&#
Hello Marvin Green,
Responding to your article on Thursday, March 02, 2000 at 09:15:24 GMT
+0100 (which was 03/03/2000 15:15 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
ND>>> In regards to the SMTP (RFC2554) & Pop before SMTP Authentication:
ND>>> Can this be used as a way to relay ma
Heute ist Donnerstag, 2. März 2000 09:12:46
Hello Syafril
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ND>> In regards to the SMTP (RFC2554) & Pop before SMTP Authentication:
ND>> Can this be used as a way to relay mail through my personal SMTP
Hello Nick Danger,
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000 19:49:00 -0600 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, March 02, 2000, 8:49:00 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Nick Danger wrote:
> In regards to the SMTP (RFC2554) & Pop before SMTP Authentication:
> Can this be used as a way to relay mail
Hello Nick Danger,
Responding to your article on Thursday, March 02, 2000 at 19:49:00 GMT
-0600 (which was 02/03/2000 8:49 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
ND> In regards to the SMTP (RFC2554) & Pop before SMTP Authentication:
ND> Can this be used as a way to relay mail through my per
In regards to the SMTP (RFC2554) & Pop before SMTP Authentication:
Can this be used as a way to relay mail through my personal SMTP mail
server via the company LAN/T1? If so, any tricks I need to know?
--
- Nick
Using The Bat! 1.41 Beta/3
under Windows 98 4.10 Build
t; tracer wrote:
>>>> Fetching and sending mail could be done using external dedicated program.
>>>> For the convinience of users it could be great to implement a way to
>>>> communicate with the mail server.
Steve>>> Actually, it is done by external ded
ith the mail server.
Steve>> Actually, it is done by external dedicated programs. They're called SMTP
Steve>> servers. ;)
t> Actually I would like the bat to do it with a buildin or addon locally
t> running SMTP server, ie not involving the isp.
I have read this about an e
Hello Jast,
J> Actually, it does work. This account is also one belonging to my
J> very own domain. And theoretically you can use any SMTP server, even
J> it belongs to some other service.
Ok, now I got you.
I wanted to make sure, that TheBat! is not responsible -- now I can
t
Morning Claudius Regn,
> It's the POP of my very own domain, so this is not an option. Thanks
> for your help, though.
Actually, it does work. This account is also one belonging to my
very own domain. And theoretically you can use any SMTP server, even
it belongs to some ot
Hello Jast,
J> Get an account at a free POP-mail service that also offers SMTP
It's the POP of my very own domain, so this is not an option. Thanks
for your help, though.
--
With best regards,
Claudius Regn mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! 1.38e under Wi
Dear Claudius,
on Sunday, January 09, 2000, 22:50, you wrote:
CR>SEND - mail was not sent. Server reply - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...Relaying
CR> Denied: Authenticate with POP first.'
CR>Any ideas?
This looks like a problem with your ISP to me. Had the same problem a
while ago, to
Morning Claudius Regn,
> for one mail account I use POP before SMTP. In about 95% TheBat!
> handles this as well as it should.
[...]
> Any ideas?
I had similar (and other) problems with the SMTP server of this
account. (Are you using Strato too?) I couldn't solve it but I have
501 - 600 of 602 matches
Mail list logo
