Re[2]: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-20 Thread 9Val
Hello Robin, RA I also continue to experience message lists that are blank when the RA folder is selected.It only occurs within a short period of time after TB! RA has been started (say the first 5 mins) but it has happened that a folder RA will display the contents initially, but when I move

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-20 Thread Robin Anson
On Tue 20 July 2004, 17:44:40 +1000, 9val wrote: RA I also continue to experience message lists that are blank when the RA folder is selected.It only occurs within a short period of time after TB! RA has been started (say the first 5 mins) but it has happened that a folder RA will display the

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-19 Thread 9Val
Hello Robin, RA Has anyone else experienced either of these problems? It can be caused by VFs with complex filters or/and operating on huge folders. Try to check 'Store state between sessions' in VF properties it should help. -- 9Val

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-19 Thread Robin Anson
On Tue 20 July 2004, 5:15:28 +1000, 9val wrote: RA Has anyone else experienced either of these problems? It can be caused by VFs with complex filters or/and operating on huge folders. Try to check 'Store state between sessions' in VF properties it should help. I have one VF that checks for

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-16 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Fri, 16 Jul 2004, at 09:52:13 +1000, @ @ when Robin Anson wrote: When I first start up TB! 2.12 it takes roughly 80 secs from opening the TB! window until numbers start to appear next to folders

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-16 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Thursday, July 15, 2004, 9:03 PM, you wrote: PO Just timed, roughly. PO Startup takes approx 30 sec, updating all the msg counters. PO Shutdown, compress all folders, takes approx 10 seconds. so, it seems pretty common, as Mica also mentioned, to take 30+ seconds to get TB up and running..

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-16 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Robin, On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:52:13 +1000GMT (16-7-2004, 1:52 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RA When I first start up TB! 2.12 it takes roughly 80 secs from opening the RA TB! window until numbers start to appear next to folders indicating RA numbers of messages. RA Has anyone else

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-16 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Friday, July 16, 2004, 6:48 AM, you wrote: RO 1 pop account RO 28000 + messages RO No virtual folders RO Win XP pro with the latest fixes RO P4 3GHz 2GB RO Server is on the LAN RO Starting TB for the first time after booting takes 3 or 4 seconds, RO including the download of the (20-30)

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-16 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Paul, On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 07:21:41 -0400GMT (16-7-2004, 13:21 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO I suppose the virtual folders might be the problem. PC I suppose a turbo-charged processor and 10 times the normal amount PC of memory MIGHT have a teensy weensy bit to do with it?? A bit,

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-16 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Fri, 16 Jul 2004, at 12:48:45 +0200, @ @ when Roelof Otten wrote: P4 3GHz 2GB Server is on the LAN Starting TB for the first time after booting takes 3 or 4 seconds, including the download of the

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-16 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Friday, July 16, 2004, 8:17 AM, you wrote: RO A faster computer helps, just as less messages helps. But on a six RO year old computer (okay, so I upgraded the memory a bit) I was done RO counting the messages in 17 seconds, now you tell me that waiting for RO 30 seconds before starting to

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-16 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ._)~~ ~( __ _o Was Fri, 16 Jul 2004, at 14:08:58 +0200, @ @ when Mica Mijatovic wrote: P4 3GHz 2GB Server is on the LAN Starting TB for the first time after booting takes 3 or 4 seconds, including the download of the

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-16 Thread Robin Anson
On Fri 16 July 2004, 22:17:30 +1000, Roelof Otten wrote: Additional plug-ins might cause the system slowing down, especially the BayesIt twit, but I really think it's the virtual folder thingy. I don't run any of those plugins, although I do have a virtual folder. However, I have exactly the

Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread Robin Anson
When I first start up TB! 2.12 it takes roughly 80 secs from opening the TB! window until numbers start to appear next to folders indicating numbers of messages. If I close and restart TB! it takes less time for this process to happen, but it is still 30 or 40 secs until the numbering process

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Thursday, July 15, 2004, 7:52 PM, you wrote: RA Furthermore, the contents of the folder that is initially highlighted RA will often not appear for some considerable time. Sometimes the contents RA appear once number of messages in the folder has been counted, but at RA other times the message

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread Robin Anson
On Fri 16 July 2004, 10:36:28 +1000, Paul Cartwright wrote: that's not a problem, that's a feature! but seriously, how many accounts do you have and how many messages ??? 3 accounts, 8,000 messages I never timed mine, but it does take a while to load up, and I also use K9 spam filter, so

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread Robin Anson
On Fri 16 July 2004, 10:40:32 +1000, Peter Ouwehand wrote: Not unless I try to start TB while other $^*( is still loading during startup of my PC. Hmm, I checked that nothing else was loading before I started TB! Msg bases for my TB are stored on a networked location (LAN), in case the

Re: Slow startup for TB! 2.12?

2004-07-15 Thread George Mitchell
Robin Anson wrote: RA When I first start up TB! 2.12 it takes roughly 80 secs from RA opening the TB! window until numbers start to appear next to RA folders indicating numbers of messages. snip RA Has anyone else experienced either of these problems? Do you have many virtual folders? I don't