Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick! On Thursday, June 14, 2001 at 8:29:59 AM you wrote: If you have Deferred specified, then it is my understanding that the message will be saved (as per Auto-Save function if enabled), but will not remain as such once the message has

Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Thomas F
Hi Dierk, On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:19:42 +0200GMT (14/06/2001, 15:19 +0800GMT), Dierk Haasis wrote: DH I just had a look. I have auto-save enabled, sending deferred. I have auto-save disabled, and sending deferred. And when I hit put letter in outbox it is already clear that I don't mean save

Re[2]: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, June 14, 2001, 1:29:59 AM, Nick Andriash wrote: If you have Deferred specified, then it is my understanding that the message will be saved (as per Auto-Save function if enabled), but will not remain as such once the message has been successfully sent off. The message is marked

Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas! On Thursday, June 14, 2001 at 9:36:35 AM you wrote: I don't need this extra query, I'm not a moron. As you may have seen, that part is the least problematic for me. The behaviour is superfluous, inconsistent and dangerous. If there

Re[2]: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Serge Skorokhodov
Hello Dierk, Thursday, June 14, 2001, 10:19:42 AM, you wrote: skip Just to put my couple of cents:) I back those who don't like the new behavior. It's unnatural and things happen in a way opposite to one most users expect. My opinion is strong and is like that:))) - Nobody bothers of

Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread A Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:49:07 +0800, Thomas contributed this to our collective wisdom: ... NA It does if you wanted the message saved, instead of being sent. TF No. If you wanted to save it as draft, you would have clicked the icon TF save draft and

Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 13, 2001, at 11:49:07 PM -0700, Thomas F wrote: This doesn't seem right. NA It does if you wanted the message saved, instead of being sent. No. If you wanted to save it as draft, you would have clicked the icon save draft and not put

Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 14, 2001, at 3:12:01 AM -0700, A Curtis Martin wrote: The problem now seems to be with deferred deliveries. There are two ways of deferring. You could hit Shift+F2 which works just fine, i.e., the message is placed in the outbox and

Re[2]: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, June 14, 2001, 11:02:52 AM, Nick Andriash wrote: No. If you wanted to save it as draft, you would have clicked the icon save draft and not put letter in outbox. That is not what Dwight did. TB! asked him if he wanted to Save the Message, and he answered Yes, and the message was

Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick! On Thursday, June 14, 2001 at 6:12:25 PM you wrote: Not on my install. I have Auto-Save enabled,, and if I choose Deferred for delivery, construct a message and hit Ctrl/Enter, the message is immediately placed in the Outbox, ready

Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-14 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 14, 2001, at 10:05:13 AM -0700, Dierk Haasis wrote: Nick, you are coming in. The problem started with 1.53bis. You are using SecureBat 1.53. Yes, I made that mistake initially, but I also tested the feature with TB! 1.53bis. I have

Strange haeders (was Re[2]:   How to download old/read messages from the server ?)

2001-06-14 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings Nick On 14 June 2001 at 11:10:46 -0700 (which was 19:10 where I live) Nick Andriash might have written Have a close look at the subject I think that there is an extra space has crept in somewhere. I view by thread and when I move

Re:  Strange haeders (was Re[2]:   How to download old/read messages from the server ?)

2001-06-14 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 14, 2001, at 11:50:13 AM, David van Zuijlekom wrote: I checked the headers of your message and those of Nick Andriash, and they both have those sort of scrambled text. Yes, because if I'm replying specifically to your message, TB! should

Re: Strange haeders (was Re[2]:   How to download old/read messages from the server ?)

2001-06-14 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 14, 2001, at 11:23:35 AM, David Elliott wrote: Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?B?UmU6IKCgSG93IHRvIGRvd25sb2FkIG9sZC9yZWFkIG1lc3NhZ2VzIGZy?= =?ISO-8859-1?B?b20gdGhlIHNlcnZlciA/?= and displayed as Re:   How to download old/read messages

Re: Strange haeders (was Re[2]:   How to download old/read messages from the server ?)

2001-06-14 Thread David van Zuijlekom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick, On Thursday, June 14, 2001 at 12:07:22 -0700, Nick Andriash [NA] wrote concerning 'Strange haeders (was Re[2]: How to download old/read messages from the server ?)': Re:   How to download old/read messages from the server ? As you

Re: Strange headers

2001-06-14 Thread Devid Verfaillie
the scrambled text in the subject header. I have no clue why. I checked my archives of the mailingslists and all of my messages have this strange subject headers. Does anybody know what's happening over here? I just noticed the same with my messages. I seems to be a 'problem' (bug

Re:  Strange haeders (was Re[2]:   How to download old/read messages from the server ?)

2001-06-14 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 14, 2001, at 12:31:32 PM, David van Zuijlekom wrote: No, I don't think so. If I look at this whole thread not my messages are adding a space between the Re: and the subject, but your messages. Have a look at my first reply in this thread.

Re:  Strange haeders (was Re[2]:   How to download old/read messages from the server ?)

2001-06-14 Thread David van Zuijlekom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick, On Thursday, June 14, 2001 at 13:45:14 -0700, Nick Andriash [NA] wrote concerning 'Strange haeders (was Re[2]: How to download old/read messages from the server ?)': No, I don't think so. If I look at this whole thread not my messages

Re: Strange Characters (test)

2001-06-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
what you find is what you get. here it comes. -- Dwight A Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax:316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL

Re:   Strange haeders (was Re[2]:   How to download old/read messages from the server ?)

2001-06-14 Thread Devid Verfaillie
Hello TBUDL, On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:22:45 +0200 (which was 23:22:45 where I live) David van Zuijlekom wrote: Can somebody help us out here? I did some testing and I came to this conclusion: - TB! defaults to us-ascii (7-bit encoding) when you don't use any 'special' characters, even

Re[2]: Strange Characters (test)

2001-06-14 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, June 14, 2001, 4:28:38 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote: what you find is what you get. here it comes. Unless I needed to exit and restart for my choice of character sets to take effect, cannot confirm that the character set is the problem. -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS

Re:   Strange haeders (was Re[2]:   How to download old/read messages from the server ?)

2001-06-14 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 14, 2001, at 2:22:45 PM, David van Zuijlekom wrote: When you look at the whole thread (by references) you can see that the added spaces doesn't come from my messages but from your messages. Yes, I can see the spaces that were added with

strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-13 Thread Dwight A Corrin
The last couple of messages I have composed (which corresponds at least approximately to my moving from 1.53 to 1.53bis and also my activation of autosave) when I have hit the Put Letter in Outbox button, instead of that happening I get a dialogue box asking if I want to save the message. When I

Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-13 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 13, 2001, at 9:29:31 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote: I get a dialogue box asking if I want to save the message. When I answer yes, the message ends up in the outbox, but it is marked as parked (or whatever one calls the outbox equivalent).

Re[2]: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-13 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 11:48:38 PM, Nick Andriash wrote: I get a dialogue box asking if I want to save the message. When I answer yes, the message ends up in the outbox, but it is marked as parked (or whatever one calls the outbox equivalent). This doesn't seem right. It does if you

Re[2]: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-13 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Wednesday, June 13, 2001, 11:48:38 PM, Nick Andriash wrote: I get a dialogue box asking if I want to save the message. When I answer yes, the message ends up in the outbox, but it is marked as parked (or whatever one calls the outbox equivalent). This doesn't seem right. It does if

Re: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-13 Thread Nick Andriash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On June 13, 2001, at 10:29:39 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote: first, I'm back, because this time, even though I said no, don't save, the message was still marked as a draft in the out box. It should all depend on the time interval between Saves.

Re[2]: strange (at least to me) behavior on sending to outbox

2001-06-13 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, June 14, 2001, 12:41:36 AM, Nick Andriash wrote: It should all depend on the time interval between Saves. Sounds like the time it took you to construct the Reply, the time interval had elapsed, so TB! saved the message. I agree though that when you specifically say No to saving

Re: Strange Dial up Problems!!

2001-03-21 Thread Dean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Lars, Wednesday, March 21, 2001, 2:04:58 AM, you wrote: L If you disable PGP line wrapping and leave the wrapping up to The L Bat!, your messages will be wrapped in a more legible way ;-) Corrected as soon as I saw the post. It does look

Strange Dial up Problems!!

2001-03-20 Thread Steve Harris
and eventually times out. This doesn't happen all the time, but enough to be a real nuisance. The really strange thing is that if I'm already online (from having started Internet Explorer or some other net program) and I select to check all accounts in the Bat - then there is never a problem

Re: Strange Dial up Problems!!

2001-03-20 Thread Thomas
Hallo Steve, On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 05:08:59 -0800 (PST) GMT (20/03/2001, 21:08 +0800 GMT), Steve Harris wrote: SH I don't know whether this is a serious problem with The bat - but here SH goes SH In the Bat (Beta v1.52 exec 1 and also previous versions)) I have the Dial SH up networking set

Re: Strange Dial up Problems!!

2001-03-20 Thread Dean
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Steve, Tuesday, March 20, 2001, 7:08:59 AM, you wrote: S This doesn't happen all the S time, but enough to be a real nuisance. Have you been using my machine :) Seriously, I was having the same problems, although I'm on cable. I noticed

Re: Strange Dial up Problems!!

2001-03-20 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Dean, On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, at 17:36:44 -0600 you wrote: What one thing has to do with the other and why it seems to correlate to how the Bat! functions I couldn't tell you. I do know if I run a registry utility and clean it up, defrag my disk, and then reload [...] If you disable PGP

Re: Strange Error Message on Sending?

2001-02-22 Thread Thomas
Hello Marck and Nick, why is this in the OT list? On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:22:29 +GMT (22/02/2001, 18:22 +0800GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP On 22 February 2001 at 02:15:36 -0800 (which was 10:15 where I live) MDP Nick Andriash wrote and made these points: NA I am trying to help an

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-16 Thread Thomas
Hallo Lija, On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:10:19 +0100 GMT (15/02/2001, 16:10 +0800 GMT), Lija wrote: MK But what about messages I want to leave on the server? Ie large MK messages I want to receive in job place, but small at home only??? Ai Take a look at TBUDLs archive. There is a solution

Re[2]: Strange deleting

2001-02-15 Thread Lija
Hello ANT-ilic, On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, at 04:12:07 (your local time), you wrote: MK I don't know what I doing wrong... MK I set the message length limit (20kB). When I receive such mails, MK the info arrives: MK "A message with the size exceeding 20 K bytes limit has arrived to MK

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-15 Thread Michal Kozusznik
Hello Marck, Thursday, February 15, 2001, 2:32:50 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: TB already has that option. It's the "leave messages on server" setting which works well for *exactly* this purpose. It is your ISP you need to talk to next because they are the ones lacking support for the

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-15 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michal, On 15 February 2001 at 12:29:44 +0100 (which was 11:29 where I live) Michal Kozusznik wrote and made these points: TB already has that option. It's the "leave messages on server" setting which works well for *exactly* this purpose.

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-15 Thread Thomas
Hallo Marck, On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:50:30 + GMT (15/02/2001, 19:50 +0800 GMT), Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MK I need an option, that makes possible to leave on server only MK large message. With unread status. MDP There's no such thing really. POP3 servers don't record "read/unread" MDP

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-15 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, On 15 February 2001 at 00:41:00 +0800 (which was 16:41 where I live) Thomas wrote and made these points: MDP There's no such thing really. POP3 servers don't record MDP "read/unread" information, just message IDs. T Is that so?

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-15 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:41:00 +0800, Thomas wrote these comments: --snip-- T Eudora does it. when you have a "big" message (i.e. over the T download limit), it keeps the message on the server, and you have T the choice to download it completely

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-15 Thread Thomas
Hi Allie, On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:55:51 -0500GMT (16/02/2001, 06:55 +0800GMT), A . Curtis Martin wrote: ACM You can get TB! to do the above by doing the following. [...] ACM This works just great for me. All messages are deleted from the server ACM except for the large ones and I have two days

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-15 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:40:16 +0800, Thomas contributed this to our collective wisdom: ACM This works just great for me. All messages are deleted from the ACM server except for the large ones and I have two days to inspect ACM and download them if I

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-14 Thread ANT-ilic
Hello Michal, Tuesday, February 13, 2001, 9:35:52 AM, you wrote: MK Hello MK I don't know what I doing wrong... MK I set the message length limit (20kB). When I receive such mails, MK the info arrives: MK "A message with the size exceeding 20 K bytes limit has arrived to MK your

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-14 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michal, On 13 February 2001 at 11:17:50 +0100 (which was 10:17 where I live) Michal Kozusznik wrote and made these points: 1.) Leave messages on server for a couple of days, so that it is sure that any messages that should be downloaded,

Strange deleting

2001-02-13 Thread Michal Kozusznik
Hello I don't know what I doing wrong... I set the message length limit (20kB). When I receive such mails, the info arrives: "A message with the size exceeding 20 K bytes limit has arrived to your address - the message has been automatically removed from the server." But what

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-13 Thread Thomas
Hi Michal, On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:35:52 +0100GMT (13/02/2001, 16:35 +0800GMT), Michal Kozusznik wrote: MK But what about messages I want to leave on the server? Ie large MK messages I want to receive in job place, but small at home only??? What you have encountered is what I call

Re: Strange deleting

2001-02-13 Thread Michal Kozusznik
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, February 13, 2001, 9:37:41 AM, Thomas wrote: 1.) Leave messages on server for a couple of days, so that it is sure that any messages that should be downloaded, will have been. It's not too good. When I do that, next day (or even few hours later) I'll receive all mails

small export-messages bug something strange...

2001-01-30 Thread Roel
Hello Everybody, when you wish to export a single message, you can't select the 'desktop' folder (as in: the 'root' of the tree) further: my previous message (as does this one) had the line: 'hello everybody,' on top, but when I got it back through the list, that line the blank line

Re: small export-messages bug something strange...

2001-01-30 Thread Brian Clark
Hello Roel, (R == "Roel") [EMAIL PROTECTED] drafted: R when you wish to export a single message, you can't select the R 'desktop' folder (as in: the 'root' of the tree) You can go down the tree to C:\Windows\Desktop, but, I agree, Clicking on Desktop at the top of the tree should do what is

Re: small export-messages bug something strange...

2001-01-30 Thread Nick Andriash
On January 30, 2001, at 7:33:01 AM, Roel Wrote: R when you wish to export a single message, you can't select the R 'desktop' folder (as in: the 'root' of the tree) Do you mean when using the menu item "Message/Save as"? If so, I am able to save it to the desktop. Even if I use the right

Re: small export-messages bug something strange...

2001-01-30 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Roel, On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 16:33:01 [ +0100 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'small export-messages bug something strange...': Roel [...] when you wish to export a single message, you can't select the Roel 'desktop' folder [...] I don't why you call this a bug

Re: small export-messages bug something strange...

2001-01-30 Thread Roel
Hi Jan On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:36:25 -0500GMT (which was 30/01/2001, 18:36 +0100GMT for me), you wrote: JR I don't why you call this a bug. because it should work :-) JR You can "save as" to the desktop; at least, I can using Win98. I can do that too, but if I wish to export multiple

Strange (was Re[2]: Account configuration file)

2001-01-14 Thread David Buntenbroich
Hi, could you tell me what happened here? I wrote in the last message (and this is also what shows up in my sent folder): "From the readme-file:" (without the quotes) and now I just received my very own message with the following line "From the readme-file:" (without the quotes) Well, how

Re: Strange (was Re[2]: Account configuration file)

2001-01-14 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello David, DB = David Buntenbroich On Sun, 14 Jan 2001 at 22:15:08 GMT +0100 (which was 1:15 PM where I live) witnesses say David Buntenbroich typed: DB "From the readme-file:" (without the quotes) DB Well, how did that "" get there? It only happened in this one line. Some Mail

Re: Strange (was Re[2]: Account configuration file)

2001-01-14 Thread SyP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David, You wrote on 1/14/2001, 10:15 PM: David could you tell me what happened here? David I wrote in the last message (and this is also what shows up in my sent David folder): David "From the readme-file:" (without the quotes) David and

Re: Strange (was Re[2]: Account configuration file)

2001-01-14 Thread Mike Yetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, at 22:27:47 [GMT +0100], SyP wrote: S According to what Kenneth Porter wrote on 8/10/2000, 8:57 PM: S The sequence "CRLFCRLFFrom" is used to denote the beginning of S a message. If this sequence occurs in the middle of a

Re: Strange (was Re[2]: Account configuration file)

2001-01-14 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Mike, On 14 January 2001 at 16:45:02 -0500 (which was 21:45 where I live) Mike Yetto wrote and made these points: MY What I have to add will change this theory. It doesn't. *Some* servers add it. Mine didn't. Neither did yours. David's did.

Re: Strange (was Re[2]: Account configuration file)

2001-01-14 Thread Mike Yetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 14 Jan 2001, at 22:48:06 [GMT +], Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP Hi Mike, MDP On 14 January 2001 at 16:45:02 -0500 (which was 21:45 where I MDP live) Mike Yetto wrote and made these points: MY What I have to add will change this

Re: Strange thing

2001-01-09 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello! Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 10:35:21 AM, Danilo Barbuio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: lost DB well, I checked all the things you told me (thank you for that), but DB the result was that there is nothing wrong. The other things that DB happened today is that everything is working again

Re: Strange thing

2001-01-09 Thread Danilo Barbuio
encountered any side effects? Did TB! hang to the "(Not AGSAA responding)" state? not at all .... nothing strange other than hang and today is working again. I hope the problem is closed :-) Ciao -- Best regards, Danilomailto:[EMAIL

Strange thing

2001-01-08 Thread Danilo Barbuio
Hi to everybody I have a strange problem. I manage with The Bat 5 account and today, after installing version 1.49, when I try to create a new message with one of this accounts (one only the other are working well) the program hang with no message at all. Any hint about this? Danilo

Re: Strange thing

2001-01-08 Thread Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris)
Hello! Monday, January 08, 2001, 11:52:20 AM, Danilo Barbuio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DB I have a strange problem. I manage with The Bat 5 account and today, DB after installing version 1.49, when I try to create a new message with DB one of this accounts (one only the other are working well

Re: Strange thing

2001-01-08 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Andrey, On Tue, 9 Jan 2001 00:25:26 +0300 GMT (09/01/2001, 05:25 +0800 GMT), Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) wrote: Andrey Monday, January 08, 2001, 11:52:20 AM, Danilo Barbuio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DB I have a strange problem. I manage with The Bat 5 account and today, DB after

Re: Strange thing

2001-01-08 Thread Danilo Barbuio
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, January 09, 2001, 6:06:55 AM, you wrote: Andrey Have you checked the properties for the account in trouble? Double check Andrey the paths TB! uses to store the message base. What if you're replying to Andrey someone's mail? What about forwarding - does it works also?

strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Jason Ostrom
Hello list, I was wondering if you could shed some light on an issue I have been having trouble with. I have been running Bat 1.46 for almost a year without a problem until I started receiving the following error message every time I pop my mail. It is a very annoying popup applet and

Re: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread George F. Schoelles
Hello Jason, Saturday, December 23, 2000, 2:50:14 PM, you wrote: JO "Norton Antivirus has detected the virus in: Have you recently turned on E-mail virus detection in NAV or made some E-mail address or NAV settings that would cause a change? -- Best regards, George

Re: OT: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jason, On 23 December 2000 at 16:50:14 -0600 (which was 22:50 where I live) Jason Ostrom wrote and made these points: Please do not write to this list in HTML. It is against the list rules. JO popup applet and also makes a sound every

Re: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Jason Ostrom
CTED] Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 5:20 PM Subject: Re: strange antivirus message issue Hello Jason, Saturday, December 23, 2000, 2:50:14 PM, you wrote: JO "Norton Antivirus has detected the virus in: Have you recently turned on E-mail virus detection in NAV or made some E-mai

Re: OT: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Jason Ostrom
PROTECTED] To: "Jason Ostrom on TBUDL" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 5:41 PM Subject: Re: OT: strange antivirus message issue -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jason, On 23 December 2000 at 16:50:14 -0600 (which was 22:50 where I live) Jason O

Re: OT: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jason, On 24 December 2000 at 18:01:55 -0600 (which was 00:01 where I live) Jason Ostrom wrote and made these points: JO But this time around, I re-installed TB, and I'm not getting the errors. JO Probably because I disabled Norton auto protect,

Re: OT: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Nick Andriash
On December 23, 2000, at 4:01:55 PM, Jason Ostrom Wrote: JO But this time around, I re-installed TB, and I'm not getting the errors. JO Probably because I disabled Norton auto protect, in addition to JO re-installing? Do you still have the infected message somewhere on your HDD? Why don't you

Re: strange antivirus message issue

2000-12-23 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Jason, On Sat, 23 Dec 2000 17:52:16 -0600 GMT (24/12/2000, 07:52 +0800 GMT), Jason Ostrom wrote: JO No, I have not turned on Email virus detection in NAV, Now, how would this error message come up then? I can assure you that TB does not issue warning under the NAV pseudonym. NAV is

Re: strange happernings

2000-10-11 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello A! On Wednesday, October 11, 2000 at 4:08:03 AM you wrote: TB! wraps its message text before sending. There's no need for PGP to be re-wrapping the text again. Just a thought: Since I just about 3 or 4 weeks ago unchecked the PGP

Re: strange happernings

2000-10-11 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 11 Oct 2000 17:40:19 +0200, Dierk Haasis wrote: DH Just a thought: Since I just about 3 or 4 weeks ago unchecked the PGP DH option but never before got some comment about bad reflow ... could DH another "solution" be to have TB!

Re[2]: strange happernings

2000-10-11 Thread Jan Rifkinson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Batlisters. In a post time stamped 21:08:03 -0500 re: strange happernings A. Curtis Martin wrote: JR denominator. So I deleted the two addresses which were JR filtered for the folder in question. ACM

strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello BatListers, This morning I tried to reply to a msg in a folder filtered for a specific subject. However, when I selected text [ or just reply ] nothing came up except my signature. This is most puzzling as it only seems to apply to this one folder. The reply

Re: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, On Tuesday, October 10, 2000, 2:22:54 PM, Jan Rifkinson wrote: %QINCLUDE="signbouv" Does that template include the %CLEAR macro? Regards, Markus Using The Bat! 1.47 Beta/7 under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5 -- --

Re[2]: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Batlisters. In a post time stamped 15:02:04 +0200 re: strange happernings Markus Gloede wrote: %QINCLUDE="signbouv" MG Does that template include the %CLEAR macro? No, Markus, the %clear macro is not within this template nor is there

Re: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 08:22:54 -0400, Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR This morning I tried to reply to a msg in a folder filtered for a JR specific subject. However, when I selected text [ or just reply ] JR nothing came up except my signature. This is most

Re: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:27:12 -0400, Jan Rifkinson wrote: ACM Is this problem occurring with a particular message filtered to the ACM folder or is it occurring with all messages filtered to the folder? JR JR: All msgs in the folder.

Re: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread Ming-Li
On Tuesday, October 10, 2000, 7:27:12 AM, Jan wrote: ACM Is this problem occurring with a particular message filtered ACM to the folder or is it occurring with all messages filtered to ACM the folder? JR: All msgs in the folder. Are all the messages in that folder from a specific

Re[2]: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Batlisters. In a post time stamped 08:05:29 -0700 re: strange happernings Ming-Li wrote: ML Are all the messages in that folder from a specific sender? If so, ML is the sender in your address book? Have you check the AB for ML address-specific template? Are those

Re: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread A . Curtis Martin
no, didn't work JR no, this does not work in the folder. Strange. My only suggestion is that you delete and recreate the template and as a last resort recreate the folder. Strange problems usually have strange solutions, unless of course, something simple is being missed. :-) - -- A. Curtis Martin

Re[2]: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Batlisters. In a post time stamped 14:50:28 -0500 re: strange happernings A. Curtis Martin wrote: ACM Strange. My only suggestion is that you delete and recreate the template ACM and as a last resort recreate the folder. Strange problems usually have ACM strange

Re[3]: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Batlisters. In a post time stamped 18:30:29 -0400 re: strange happernings Jan Rifkinson wrote: JR Hello Batlisters. JR In a post time stamped 14:50:28 -0500 re: strange happernings JR A. Curtis Martin wrote: ACM Strange. My only suggestion

Re: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Jan, On Tuesday, October 10, 2000 at 19:53:16 GMT -0400 (which was 4:53 PM where I live) witnesses say Jan Rifkinson typed: Never mind. I fixed it. Do you mind telling us how, just in case it comes up again? -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal See header for e-mail

Re: strange happernings

2000-10-10 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:57:41 -0400, Jan Rifkinson wrote: snip JR I didn't have special templates in the AB or JR for the JR specific addresses associated with the folder JR but the JR address entries seemed to

Re: strange problem: view folder

2000-09-27 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi A, On 27 September 2000 at 23:27:10 GMT -0500 (which was 05:27 where I live) A . Curtis Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of "strange problem: view folder": HDS aren't. I can't figure out how to activate them again sh

Re: strange problem: view folder

2000-09-27 Thread Karin Spaink
On 27-09-2000 at 06:07, Avenarius kindly wrote: Havivah D. Schwartz, HDS In View Folder, I sometimes find that all of a sudden a bunch of HDS the buttons and menu commands gray out. That is, all the buttons HDS commands will be available at first, and then all of a sudden HDS they aren't. I

Re: strange problem: view folder

2000-09-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Karin, On Wednesday, September 27, 2000 at 11:01:17 GMT +0200 (which was 2:01 AM where I live) witnesses say Karin Spaink typed: grin I just discovered something funny: The memo window has a proportional font ;-) nudge The message list, the folder list, the cookie definition box

Re: strange problem: view folder

2000-09-27 Thread Havivah D. Schwartz
Hello Marck and Avenarius, Thanks for the responses. I wish it weren't happening, but since it is, I'm glad I'm not the only one. :/ Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 04:25:50, Marck wrote: MDP I *do* experience this on occasion. I think it is when MDP resources are low and TB can't get

strange problem: view folder

2000-09-26 Thread Havivah D. Schwartz
Hello all! Allow me to ask for your kind services yet again; I may not be able to give enough info for you to help me, but I'd very much like to know if anyone else is having this problem: In View Folder, I sometimes find that all of a sudden a bunch of the buttons and menu commands gray out.

Re: strange problem: view folder

2000-09-26 Thread Avenarius
A Bat-fellow, Havivah D. Schwartz, wrote on Tuesday, September 26, 2000 at 10:56:51 (GMT -0400), which was 16:56 in Bratislava -- HDS Allow me to ask for your kind services yet again; I may not be HDS able to give enough info for you to help me, but I'd very much HDS like to know if anyone else

Re: strange problem: view folder

2000-09-26 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 10:56:51 -0400, Havivah D. Schwartz wrote: snip HDS In View Folder, I sometimes find that all of a sudden a bunch of HDS the buttons and menu commands gray out. That is, all the buttons HDS commands will be available at first,

Very strange message

2000-08-29 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello ananta! Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 8:19:31 PM, you wrote: Thanks for your message, I will get back ASAP Haribol Can anybody fill me in what this is (about)? To me it looks like a bad piece of "How to distribute a virus" except, there seems

Re: Strange things when replying

2000-08-23 Thread A . Curtis Martin
On Sun, 20 Aug 2000 21:32:51 +0200, Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote: snip JAL The View menu in the Message Editor has an option that reads: JAL "Store window position". I have never cared about this one...until JAL now, because I always run the editor maximized, and therefore, it JAL shouldn't be

Re: Strange things when replying

2000-08-19 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ming-Li, On 19 August 2000 at 20:36:26 GMT -0700 (which was 04:36 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Strange things when replying": ML I'm moving tomorrow and won't have Internet access for

Re: Strange things when replying

2000-08-19 Thread A . Curtis Martin
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 18:13:55 -0700, Ming-Li wrote: ML What it doesn't make sense to me is if I put %cursor before %quote, ML it should mean I want my cursor to be positioned in front of the ML quotes. But it doesn't. TB always put my cursor after (below) the ML quoted text. This never happens

Re: Strange things when replying

2000-08-19 Thread A . Curtis Martin
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 21:13:17 +0200, Jan-Arild Løkstad wrote: JAL You are pretty good at wondering Curtis :) :-) I realised that the only difference between your setup without the %cursor macro and my setup with the %cursor macro is that my cursor is placed after the introduction and before the

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >