Re: No MAPI support

2001-08-03 Thread Thomas F
Hi Mars, On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 07:10:48 +00-02GMT (02/08/2001, 15:10 +0800GMT), Mars Descent wrote: MD> >Again: which version of TB are you using? If it difficult to help you MD> >without tis info. If you used your TB on this list, we could see the MD> >version number in the headers; otherwise,

Re: No MAPI support

2001-08-03 Thread A Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 00:23:17 -0700, Nick contributed this to our collective wisdom: ... NA> Mars, this may be a little OT, and it may just be my settings, NA> but I notice in all your replies, my copy of TB! will not NA> recognize your quoted lines as

RE: No MAPI support

2001-08-03 Thread Browning, Karl
From: Thomas F [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Hi Mars, > > On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 07:10:48 +00-02GMT (02/08/2001, 15:10 +0800GMT), > Mars Descent wrote: > > MD> >Again: which version of TB are you using? If it difficult to help you > MD> >without tis info. If you used your TB on this list, we coul

Re: No MAPI support

2001-08-03 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Nick! On Friday, August 03, 2001 at 9:23:17 AM you wrote: > Has anyone else noticed this? Oh, yes, and told him (off-list and on-list). > Is there something I can do to remedy this and have TB! apply the > appropriate colour for quotations i

Re: No MAPI support

2001-08-03 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas! On Friday, August 03, 2001 at 8:50:33 AM you wrote: > If Eudora is capable of that, I would appreciate it very much. :-) It is, well, it was years ago when I was using it. But seriously, Eudora may have some twist most of us don't lik

Re: No MAPI support

2001-08-03 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello Mars, Thursday, August 02, 2001, 9:10:48 AM, you wrote: MD> So, this button works for most people, or no one hasn't mentioned MD> anything? I started with The Bat 1.51 and have upgraded gradually to 1.53d. I guess it is MAPI that makes it possible to send documents from inside Word?

TheBat! and Arabic support

2001-08-09 Thread tamuz
Hello fellow baters, Has anyone managed to get TheBat! to support the use of the Arabic language? and if you have, how did you do it? -- Best regards, tamuz mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- __ Archives : <h

Double Byt Language Support?

2001-10-04 Thread Paddy L
Hello TBUDL, On Thursday, October 04, 2001 Miles D. Wolbe (TinyApps.Org) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote to me: > P.S. I see you're using The Bat! I wish it had > double byte language support (Japanese, > Chinese, etc) as everyone tells me it is just > awesome. Much of my work

Language support / spell checking

2002-01-25 Thread Gerard de Vries
Hi Bat Users, I would like to know if more people write emails in different languages on a regular basis. I do and it is a pain to switch spell checking each time to the right language. I first did this by write language switches in personal templates and although this works the big disadva

Re[2]: SSL-Support?

2002-03-24 Thread Robert F. Beeger
Hello, John! Sunday, March 24, 2002, 1:48:59 PM, John Seymour wrote JS> Hello Robert RFB>> [!] TLS (SSL) support RFB>> but I cannot find the feature. JS> Go to Account / properties / transport and check the drop down list JS> titled Connection, you will find it ther

Re[2]: ROT13 support

2002-06-25 Thread Gary
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 12:09:58 PM, you wrote: TF> Hello Gary, TF> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 10:35:15 -0400 GMT (25/06/02, 21:35 +0700 GMT), TF> Gary wrote: G>> I can't find this function in The Bat. Am I just overlooking it, or G>> is it wisely not supported since its old old old an

Re[2]: ROT13 support

2002-06-25 Thread Kurgan
Hello Thomas, TF> V pna nqq pbzzragf gung arjovrf pna'g ernq. Be pna gurl? V'z n Ebg13 arjovr, naq V'ir tbg vg! Jubbubb! Guvf pregnvayl pbhyq or sha. V jvfu vg pbhyq or "cyhttrq-va" gb Gur Ong! Best regards, KurganMailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re[3]: ROT13 support

2002-06-26 Thread Gary
Hello Kurgan, Tuesday, June 25, 2002, 6:27:21 PM, you wrote: KLc> Just curious, but what exactly *is* rot13? Sounds interesting. ROT13 is a method of 'encrypting' messages. Well, ok, it really is encryption, buts its such a weak form of it its not used for security. The ROT stands for rotat

Re[2]: Palm Support?

2001-01-03 Thread Robert Paats
Hello Alberto, Wednesday, January 03, 2001, 8:29:27 PM, you wrote: >> Hello Alexander, >> Tuesday, January 02, 2001, 10:18:25 PM, you wrote: >> It works fine with palm OS 3.3, Hotsync manager 3.0.4 on a Palm V >> With the Mail Setup setting "Mail System: Microsoft Outlook Express" AA> But

Re[2]: Palm Support?

2001-01-03 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Fred, Wednesday, January 03, 2001, 10:03:03 PM, you wrote: >> One question: Is there any support available to synchronize E-Mails >> from The Bat with my Palm PDA? And if not, is support planned for the >> future? FW> As a long-time TheBat user, and a fairly recent Pa

Re[2]: Palm Support?

2001-01-03 Thread Alexander Turcic
Hello Fred, Thursday, January 04, 2001, 4:03:03 AM, you wrote: FW> As a long-time TheBat user, and a fairly recent Palm IIIxe user, I'm FW> following this public thread. In the hopes that someone contacts you FW> off-list with the specifics, I'm wondering if you'd be so kind as to either FW> pos

Re[2]: Palm Support?

2001-01-12 Thread Serge Skorokhodov
Hello Fred, Thursday, January 04, 2001, 6:03:03 AM, you wrote: >> One question: Is there any support available to synchronize E-Mails >> from The Bat with my Palm PDA? And if not, is support planned for the >> future? FW> As a long-time TheBat user, and a fairly recent Pa

ms exchange server support

2001-01-24 Thread Rastislav Wartiak
hi guys, is there any support of microsoft exchange servers for the bat? i have server with exchange port only (i.e. no pop3/imap4/smtp) and i need to send a receive e-mail using the bat. thanks, rasto w. -- __ Archives : <h

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-29 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
would love to know. I believe that the IMAP implementation in the TB v1 is incomplete, although to what degree and in what ways I do not know. v2 is scheduled to offer far better support and, before you ask, no-one here knows the release time-scale for v2. AH> P.S. For a real imap

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-29 Thread Brian Clark
Hello Andrew, (AH == "Andrew Hodgson") [EMAIL PROTECTED] conveyed: AH> Other than the bats other rfc deficiencies, can we confirm/deny that AH> tb supports imap in the following way: I don't use IMAP, but AFAIK TB! supports it (to what degree, I don't know). In account properties, one of the

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Johannes Posel
m someone knowledgeable what TB IMAP support does and doesn't, because one of my mail providers forces me to use IMAP, POP3 is blocked ourside their LAN... Cheers, Johannesmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Whenever people agree with me I always feel I

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Andrew Hodgson
On 29 Jan 2001, at 20:35, Brian Clark wrote: > > Hello Andrew, > > (AH == "Andrew Hodgson") [EMAIL PROTECTED] conveyed: > > AH> Other than the bats other rfc deficiencies, can we confirm/deny > that AH> tb supports imap in the following way: > > I don't use IMAP, but AFAIK TB! supports it (t

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
as to be said that Mulberry is probably the paragon amongst IMAP clients. I all fairness, the very ethos of full IMAP, with on-line folder structures, goes against the TB strengths in local mail-base. I can't see how TB can offer full IMAP support and still be the TB we all "

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Andrew Hodgson
tocol, then TB v1 > > is not going to suit you. > > I would love to hear from someone knowledgeable what TB IMAP support > does and doesn't, because one of my mail providers forces me to use > IMAP, POP3 is blocked ourside their LAN... Ok, I used tb over weekend using imap supp

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear Andrew, Going back 18:29 30.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts: > This wasn't the design of imap, however, and so it didn't forfil my > requirements. So basically TB uses it just like POP3. Well, to be honest, for me this is great, because this way I can circumvent the postma

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Andrew Hodgson
in local mail-base. I can't > see how TB can offer full IMAP support and still be the TB we all > "know and love" with extreme filter, RegEx support and archive > searching capabilities. This is probably the reason TB only offers it > as a glorified POP3. I thi

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Johannes Posel
Hi there Lija, Going back 20:35 30.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts: > This is very off-topic now, but I'm curios: Why should someone enforce users to > use IMAP and ban POP3? POP3 logins are transmitted clear text, while IMAP are somewhat secured. Personally I prefer POP3-SSL o

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Andrew Hodgson
; POP3 logins are transmitted clear text, while IMAP are somewhat > secured. Personally I prefer POP3-SSL or POP3 over SSH... Not strictly true, what happened to the apop support which tb supports? > -- -- Sincerely, Andrew. Get Public PGP key from: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
or POP3 over SSH... AH> Not strictly true, what happened to the apop support which tb AH> supports? ... and MD5 CRAM. Both of these encoded login methods are supported. I use MD5-APOP myself. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D. Pearlstone -- Moderator TBUDL

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-31 Thread Johannes Posel
Hi there Mr. Fox, Going back 06:20 31.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts: > Probably allow POP3 on an internal LAN, but don't want people checking > personal mail at work, or bringing in viruses/worms in school or > something like that. The firewall admin probably forgot to block

Re: Confirm imap support

2001-01-31 Thread Johannes Posel
ia SSL. But the matter is not what I believe, its what the tech guy of a small e.V. thinks. They're perhaps 10 to 15 guys, not a real ISP but guys that are from local government funding Internet&eMail access for their citizens (well until somewhat like a year, now only eMail access). Anyw

The Bat! Support User Profiles?

2004-06-26 Thread Earendil
Hello all, I'm trying out The Bat! I've been using Mozilla Thunderbird and it has a feature which I like and wonder if The Bat! supports? I would like to have the ability to start up The Bat! with different user profiles. As an example, I would like to have User A profile setup with a couple of e

Re: Windows xp 64bit support

2005-06-08 Thread Jernej Simoncic
On Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 15:36:06, finalcut wrote: > Before I install the 64bit edition, is thebat supporting the 64bit edition of > windows xp? The only programs that don't work on Windows XP/2003 x64 are 16-bit (Windows 3.x) programs and stuff that uses 32-bit device drivers. The Bat doesn'

Re: specific Asian text support

2005-06-29 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello lee, On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:30:12 +0100 GMT (30/06/2005, 03:30 +0700 GMT), lee walters wrote: lw> I've tried pretty much all I can think of to find info on/and get lw> info how to display and write Korea characters in the The Bat. lw> Chinese, Japanese are fine...but no joy with Korean. I'

Getting no help from support...

2005-11-23 Thread Bob and Melissa
So the forums are the best becasue you have gone through itBeing a computer engineer I still can't get his damm program to workI want to run two ClientOutlook for the wife and Bat for me..Secure etc. What do I need to do..Why do I need to put in my ISP email address???I thought I

Please support BT wish 5275

2006-10-22 Thread MAU
Hello all, Sorry for cross-posting. One year ago I submitted this BT wish: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5275 I would kindly ask you to support it. If you agree with it, of course. Thanks. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.86.03 ALPHA (beta

Support for creating HTML message?

2003-06-20 Thread Dave Kennedy
As a long time TB! user and old (don't ask) Unix hacker, I'm reluctant to ask this question, but Is support for creating simple HTML messages coming down the pipe any time soon? My son wants to be able to create the color messages, big fonts, etc. that his friends are doing w

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Allie Martin
Barry Wilkinson, [BW] wrote: BW> Should I upgrade pgp to version 8? That's what I'd personally recommend. Another option would be to go the route of using GnuPG and GPGShell. There's also the PGP 6.5.8ckt builds. I don't know where you could get a copy of the latest build 8. -- -= allie_M =-

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Allie Martin
Michael Thompson, [MT] wrote: MT> www.pgpi.com MT> www.pgp.com These are the URL's to obtain official PGP versions. You'll not find the ckt builds there. -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html _ pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature _

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread gv-batter-up
Hello Allie, Sunday, September 21, 2003, 8:44:12 AM, you wrote: MT>> www.pgpi.com MT>> www.pgp.com A> These are the URL's to obtain official PGP versions. A> You'll not find the ckt builds there. http://ipgpp.veniece.com/ -- Best regards, Gary

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Andrew Hodgson
'll not find the ckt builds there. gbumi> http://ipgpp.veniece.com/ Which will lead to: ftp://ftp.zedz.net/pub/crypto/pgp/pgp60/pgp658_ckt/ What are the differences between the native PGP support in TB, the PGP 8.xx builds, the NUPG builds and the CKT builds? Diffe

Re: Disabling PGP mime support

2003-09-21 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Hi Andrew, @21-Sep-2003, 15:02 Andrew Hodgson [AH] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: AH> I need to disable PGP mime support in v 2.00.6 as some mailing AH> lists are removing the PGP parts of the message (i.e, AH> Yahoogroups not allowing attachments on some lists). I

Re: Disabling PGP mime support

2003-09-21 Thread Andrew Hodgson
Hello Marck, Sunday, September 21, 2003, 3:13:35 PM, you wrote: MDP> Hi Andrew, MDP> @21-Sep-2003, 15:02 Andrew Hodgson [AH] in MDP> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: AH>> I need to disable PGP mime support in v 2.00.6 as some mailing AH>> lists are removing the PGP

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Allie Martin
Andrew Hodgson, [AH] wrote: AH> What are the differences between the native PGP support in TB, The native support that PGP offers is PGP v2.6. When using this, you'll be restricted to using only RSA keys. Most of us use the newer DH/DSS keys so you'd not be able to verify our sign

Re: Disabling PGP mime support

2003-09-21 Thread Allie Martin
Andrew Hodgson, [AH] wrote: MDP>> Use the %NOPGPMIME macro in your template for those lists. AH> Thanks, is there any way to disable it globally? No, there isn't. TB! is stuck in auto-PGP/MIME mode. -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html _ pgp

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Gary
Hello Allie, Sunday, September 21, 2003, 9:29:34 AM, you wrote: AH>> and the CKT builds? A> These were developed by Imad Faiad in order to provide features not A> available in PGP 6.5.8, the last of the official releases of PGP v6.x.x A> I guess his further enhancement of this version to form t

Re: Disabling PGP mime support

2003-09-21 Thread Deborah W
On Sunday, September 21, 2003, 10:30:37 AM, Allie Martin wrote: AM> No, there isn't. AM> TB! is stuck in auto-PGP/MIME mode. What does the option in Account Properties - Options do then? Or is it different in v2? -- Deborah Current version is

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Gerd Ewald
Good evening Andrew Hodgson ! On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 15:05:48 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 21.09.2003, 16:05 (GMT+0200) where I live, you (Andrew Hodgson) wrote in : gbumi>> http://ipgpp.veniece.com/ > Which will lead to: > ftp://ftp.zedz.net/pub/crypto/pgp

Re: Disabling PGP mime support

2003-09-21 Thread Allie Martin
Deborah W, [DW] wrote: DW> What does the option in Account Properties - Options do then? Or is DW> it different in v2? Those are the options to enable S/MIME, OpenPGP and sign/encrypt when complete options. Those options have nothing to do with PGP/MIME specifically. -- -= allie_M =- | List Mo

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Allie Martin
Barry Wilkinson, [BW] wrote: BW> I have just upgraded to pgp 6.5.8ckt but I'm still experiencing the BW> same problems. Also sending a pgp encrypted message still reports my BW> version as 6.5i. Curious? PGP 6.5.8ckt build8 and later comes packaged with its own TB! plug-in DLL. Try using the PGP

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Gerd Ewald
Good evening Barry Wilkinson ! On Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:49:32 +0100 GMT your local time, which was 21.09.2003, 18:49 (GMT+0200) where I live, you (Barry Wilkinson) wrote in : >> Funny: both links do not let me download ;-)) > I used the posted url in ws_ftp. This allowed

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Barry! On Sunday, September 21, 2003, 12:08 PM, you wrote: >> PGP 6.5.8ckt build8 and later comes packaged with its own TB! plug-in >> DLL. Try using the PGP ckt with it. B> How do I select this plug-in? I assume it was installed with pgp B> 6.5.8ckt? In the main TB! window, click on Tool

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Mary Bull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Barry! On Sunday, September 21, 2003, 12:43 PM, you wrote: >> In the main TB! window, click on Tools/OpenPGP/Choose Open PGP >> Version, then put a dot in the circle beside PGP 6.0x/6.5xplug-in. >> Tools/OpenPGP/Preferences will give you a dial

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Andrew Hodgson
Hello Barry, Sunday, September 21, 2003, 7:57:27 PM, you wrote: BW> Hello Melissa, BW> Sunday, September 21, 2003, 7:38:22 PM, you wrote: >> No. There is full code release *for peer review* for the current >> v8.0.2, as it was for v8.0 (the first offerings of "PGP Corporation" >> after purchasi

Re: Open pgp version support

2003-09-21 Thread Allie Martin
Melissa Reese, [MR] wrote: MR> I purchased v8.x when it was first released, and at that point, it MR> was only available via download. I'm pretty sure this is still the MR> case. It would seem that the PGP v8 download is restricted only to paying customers at www.pgp.com . I was just there during

Re: Some MAPI support please? :)

2000-06-23 Thread Jast
Morning Christian Dysthe, > I have read that MAPI support is planned for version 2.00. If the > upgrades to 1.x keeps coming at the current rate we will see > version 1.99 in two years or so ;) Therefore I am wondering if > someone knows if there is a release time schedu

Re: Some MAPI support please? :)

2000-06-25 Thread Christopher J. Trybowski
Hello Christian, On Friday, June 16, 2000 you wrote: CD> I have read that MAPI support is planned for version 2.00. If the CD> upgrades to 1.x keeps coming at the current rate we will see CD> version 1.99 in two years or so ;) Therefore I am wondering if Any particular reason

Re: Some MAPI support please? :)

2000-06-25 Thread tracer
Hello Jast, On Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:37:13 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Friday, June 23, 2000, 10:37:13 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Jast wrote: > Morning Christian Dysthe, >> I have read that MAPI support is planned for version 2.00. If the >> upgrades to 1.x keep

Re: Some MAPI support please? :)

2000-06-26 Thread Jast
Morning tracer, > Final version > > I still havent seen a final version to v1... Final in the sense of non-beta, of course. The last final version was therefore 1.44 :-P -- .. Jast ... mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : using TB 1.45 Beta/1 : with AMD K6-2, 64MB RAM :. on Windows 98 4.10

Re[2]: Language support/dictionary

2000-09-10 Thread David
Hello Januk, Monday, September 11, 2000, 9:31:34 AM, you wrote: JA> Hello David, JA> On Sunday, September 10, 2000 at 10:19:04 GMT +1000 (which was 5:19 PM JA> where I live) witnesses say David typed: >> Can anyone tell me how I can change my dictionary from US English to >> Australian Eng

need help with IMAP Support?

2002-08-22 Thread Steve Procter
Hi   I am a beginner to The Bat and am having trouble figuring out if it supports IMAP connections like Outlook Express - i.e. the ability to synchronize folders and mails, etc?  I can't seem to get it to work.   Thanks in advance for any help... regardsSteve

Support for iso-2022-jp

2002-11-02 Thread John De Hoog
y, in UTF-8 (Unicode). So why does The Bat! support Shift-JIS but not the other encodings? Or is there some way to get The Bat! to decode those messages? I don't think it's possible with XLAT tables. -- John De Hoog, Tokyo http://dehoog.org Using The Ba

Re: TheBat! and Arabic support

2001-08-09 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Thursday, August 09, 2001, 4:40:10 PM, tamuz wrote: > Hello fellow baters (found at www.dictionary.com : bate (bt) tr.v. bat·ed, bat·ing, bates To lessen the force or intensity of; moderate: “To his dying day he bated his breath a little when he told the story” (George Eliot). See Usage Note

Re: TheBat! and Arabic support

2001-08-09 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:22:29 +0100, tamuz thoughtfully wrote the following: ... t> Since it seems that you got a lot of spare energy and time to t> spare, with nothing better to do, and since you cannot help with t> my specific query in a specific way,

Re: TheBat! and Arabic support

2001-08-09 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 16:52:09 -0500GMT (which was 23:52 +0200GMT where I live), Dwight A Corrin presented us with these thoughts about "TheBat! and Arabic support": DAC> On Thursday, August 09, 2001, 4:40:10 PM, tamuz wrote: >>

Re: TheBat! and Arabic support

2001-08-09 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:18:09 +0100, tamuz graced us with these comments: ... ACM>> I'd much prefer ... t> And I'd much prefer a straight answer to a straight question. We don't always get what we want or we may eventually get what we want with s

Re: TheBat! and Arabic support

2001-08-09 Thread Thomas F
Hi tamuz, On Fri, 10 Aug 2001 01:15:42 +0100GMT (10/08/2001, 08:15 +0800GMT), tamuz wrote: t> Now that I got this out of my system... I found a link to past t> posts of thebat! beta mailing list, I went there and entered t> the word "arabic" in the search window and got this gem of a t> post tha

Re: Double Byt Language Support?

2001-10-04 Thread Thomas F
Hi Paddy, On Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:45:55 -0700GMT (05/10/2001, 10:45 +0800GMT), Paddy L wrote: PL> Could someone kindly give Miles a current status on this. Or perhaps PL> suggest an interim alternative to rescue him from the evil clutches of PL> OE? TB has no DBCS support. I run

Re: Language support / spell checking

2002-01-25 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Gerard, On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 17:11:47 +0100GMT (25-1-2002, 17:11 +0100GMT, where I live), you wrote: GdV> I would like to know if more people write emails in different languages GdV> on a regular basis. I do and it is a pain to switch spell checking each GdV> time to the right language.

Re: Language support / spell checking

2002-01-25 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Gerard! On Friday, January 25, 2002 at 5:11:47 PM you wrote: > Does anybody have a better solution? Quick Templates? You can also define different accounts/folders for each language, filter the messages into them and use account/folder templates. I'd go for the QT's, make some basic on

Re: Language support / spell checking

2002-01-25 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hi Gerard, > Does anybody have a better solution? I regularly write e-mail in both Spanish and English, about 50-50, so it was pain for me until I found a way with Quick Templates. I have created two QTs, one called BR for English and one SP for Spanish. BR is just "%LANGUAGE="BR"" SP is "%

Re: Language support / spell checking

2002-01-26 Thread Gerard de Vries
ON Friday, January 25, 2002, 11:20:21 PM, you wrote: Miguel> Hi Gerard, >> Does anybody have a better solution? Miguel> I regularly write e-mail in both Spanish and English, about 50-50, so Miguel> it was pain for me until I found a way with Quick Templates. Miguel> I have created two QTs, o

Re: ms exchange server support

2001-01-24 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Rastislav Wartiak, On Wed, 24 Jan 2001 13:18:56 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Wednesday, January 24, 2001, 12:18:56 PM (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time, Rastislav Wartiak wrote: RW> is there any support of microsoft exchange servers for the bat? i have RW> server with exchang

Re: ms exchange server support

2001-01-24 Thread Rastislav Wartiak
RW>> is there any support of microsoft exchange servers for the bat? i have RW>> server with exchange port only (i.e. no pop3/imap4/smtp) and i need to RW>> send a receive e-mail using the bat. > There is no support that I know of. One thing is to set up a pop > acco

Re: ms exchange server support

2001-01-25 Thread Johannes Posel
Dear Jamie, Going back 16:33 24.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts: > Find a friend with an always connected Linux box. Ask him to create > you an account and use their machine as an smtp server. Find a smtp The best bet. If your mail average is low, contact me off list. > server

Re: ms exchange server support

2001-01-25 Thread Johannes Posel
Hi there Jamie, Going back 14:15 24.01.2001. when you uttered the following thoughts: > There is no support that I know of. One thing is to set up a pop > account. Set Outlook to auto redirect all mails to the pop account. > Tunnel out of the network and download from the pop account u

Re[2]: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Lija
Hello Johannes, On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 19:46:59 (your local time), you wrote: JP> So basically TB uses it just like POP3. Well, to be honest, for me JP> this is great, because this way I can circumvent the postmasters JP> stupid idea of banning POP3 and enforcing IMAP. He gives no mbox max Thi

Re[2]: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Serge Skorokhodov
love to hear from someone knowledgeable what TB IMAP >> support does and doesn't, because one of my mail providers >> forces me to use IMAP, POP3 is blocked ourside their LAN... AH> Ok, I used tb over weekend using imap support, and did not AH> notice any difference between pop

Re[2]: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Lija
Hello Johannes, On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 21:02:20 (your local time), you wrote: JP> POP3 logins are transmitted clear text, while IMAP are somewhat JP> secured. Personally I prefer POP3-SSL or POP3 over SSH... You have also APOP in TB... it's up to your ISP if supports it... -- Best Regards, L

Re[3]: Confirm imap support

2001-01-30 Thread Silver Fox
Hello Lija, Tuesday, January 30, 2001, 11:35:57 AM, you wrote: L> Hello Johannes, L> On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 19:46:59 (your local time), you wrote: JP>> So basically TB uses it just like POP3. Well, to be honest, for me JP>> this is great, because this way I can circumvent the postmasters JP>>

IMAP support just plain horrible

2001-04-22 Thread Alexander Turcic
Until recently I used The Bat solely to access my mails via POP3. I loved it! Since I am now working on several machines I would like to use the extra features of the IMAP protocol (synchronization benefits). All I can say so far is that TB's current IMAP support is too deficient

Re: Beta/3 with PNG support

2000-02-03 Thread Jast
Morning Dirk Heiser, > but the png images are not shown on the tabs on the bottom of the > message like gif and jpg images. Bug? I just added a PNG image to a mail. I got a tab, no problem, check again :-) -- .. Jast . mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :with The Bat! 1.41 Beta/3 http://w

Re: Beta/3 with PNG support

2000-02-03 Thread Dirk Heiser
Hi Jast, On Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:19:18 +0100, you wrote: J> Morning Dirk Heiser, >> but the png images are not shown on the tabs on the bottom of the >> message like gif and jpg images. Bug? J> I just added a PNG image to a mail. I got a tab, no problem, check again J> :-) You have changed th

cut-line RFC and client support

2004-02-03 Thread tb
I had a malformed cut line pointed out to me and began to wonder... tko>> -- tko>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Malformed cut-line.. I type it manually because I dislike automated signatures. TB removes excess whitespace from the ends of lines, so if I do not go back and add a space there immediately

How is The Bat's IMAP support?

2004-03-21 Thread Robin H.
I have not downloaded The Bat! yet on this computer, though I tried it on my last one, and did like it. I used it for POP3 mail. However, I do have IMAP capabilities with my webmail (Fastmail) and I have been told that IMAP is better than POP3. I tried Thunderbird, but it crashed on me and to me

Re: The Bat! Support User Profiles?

2004-06-26 Thread Paul Cartwright
E> I would like to have the ability to start up The Bat! with different E> user profiles. As an example, I would like to have User A profile setup with a E> couple of email accounts. I would like to have User B profile setup E> with a couple different email accounts. When starting The Bat!, I E> w

Re: The Bat! Support User Profiles?

2004-06-26 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Saturday, June 26, 2004, 6:22 PM, you wrote: E> Yes, I am using XP but I am not using logins. Basically, I want to E> keep personal e-mail and business e-mail in separate e-mail profiles E> while using one login for the OS. E> I know I could create different users for OS login but I would rat

Re: The Bat! Support User Profiles?

2004-06-26 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Earendil, @26-Jun-2004, 15:53 -0400 (26-Jun 20:53 UK time) Earendil said: > I would like to have the ability to start up The Bat! with > different user profiles. As an example, I would like to have User > A profile setup with a couple of email accounts. I would like to > have User B profile

Re: The Bat! Support User Profiles?

2004-06-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Rick, @27-Jun-2004, 18:19 -0400 (27-Jun 23:19 UK time) Rick Friedman said to Marck: MDP>> Check out Options - Network and Administration. The options you MDP>> need are mostly there. > Thanks for the advice. Indeed, everything I needed to accomplish > setting up "user profiles" was in the N

Re: The Bat! Support User Profiles?

2004-06-28 Thread Robin Anson
On Sun 27 June 2004, 8:22:27 +1000, Earendil wrote: > Yes, I am using XP but I am not using logins. Basically, I want to > keep personal e-mail and business e-mail in separate e-mail profiles > while using one login for the OS. Isn't that simply two accounts? I use TB! for both personal and work,

Re: Unicode support? aka Eying Infinity

2004-09-30 Thread Mica Mijatovic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ***^\ ."_)~~ ~( __ _"o Was another beautiful day, Thu, 30 Sep 2004, @ @ at 18:37:40 +0200, when Spam wrote to Edvinas: > I do not agree with you at all that Unicode is just a empty promise. You just didn't wait enough. Watering y

More support for Pro version users ?

2004-11-02 Thread WilWilWil
Hello, It's just an idea and I don't want to offend Ritlabs team, but when I used TB2.12 Home, it was pretty difficult to obtain support. I've registered TB3 PRO last week. In the morning I had a problem. I asked Support for help. 10 minutes after my problem was solved. Gre

no UTF-8 support in TB?

2005-03-01 Thread Roman Katzer
Is there no UTF-8 (Unicode) support in TB? I got a mail encoded in UTF-8 and the "special" characters are displayed wrongly. Regards, Roman -- If you must drink, please don't drive. Don't even putt. Current version

Re[2]: Windows xp 64bit support

2005-06-08 Thread finalcut
Hello Jernej, Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 10:54:14 AM, you wrote: > On Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 15:36:06, finalcut wrote: >> Before I install the 64bit edition, is thebat supporting the 64bit edition >> of windows xp? > The only programs that don't work on Windows XP/2003 x64 are 16-bit (Windows

Mod: Cut mark (was: SSL Support)

2005-10-12 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo kattack, On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:33:06 +0300GMT (12-10-2005, 12:33 +0200, where I live), you wrote: K> Thanks in advance. K> K> Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information: Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all re

Re: Getting no help from support...

2005-11-23 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Bob and Melissa & everyone else, on 23-Nov-2005 at 18:45 you (Bob and Melissa) wrote: > So the forums are the best becasue you have gone through itBeing a > computer engineer I still can't get his damm program to workI want to > run two ClientOutlook for the wife and Bat for me.

Re: Getting no help from support...

2005-11-23 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Bob and Melissa & everyone else, on 23-Nov-2005 at 21:39 you (Bob and Melissa) wrote: > I am running Xp Media center sp2 So you could create two separate user accounts to log in to Windows. One for your wife, with a fully configured OE, one for yourself, with TB. > we share an outlook exp

Re: Getting no help from support...

2005-11-23 Thread Jernej Simoncic
ice. Don't suggest that to Outlook (Express) user - from my experiences, the IMAP support in Outlook (even 2003) is awful at best (and very confusing to inexperienced user), and I wouldn't count on OE to have it any better. -- < Jernej Simoncic ><><><><&

Re: Getting no help from support...

2005-11-23 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Bob, @23-Nov-2005, 15:39 -0500 (23-Nov 20:39 here) Bob and Melissa [BAM] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: BAM> I am running Xp Media center sp2 BAM> we share an outlook express account BAM> I want to have her just use the outlook accout and I use the bat seperate BAM> and not from the ou

Re: Getting no help from support...

2005-11-23 Thread Vili
BaM> So the forums are the best becasue you have gone through BaM> itBeing a computer engineer I still can't get his damm BaM> program to work You are not serious, right? What kind of computer engineer does not know what is POP and SMTP? If you don't joke, correct your intro: "..be

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >